Exploring the experiences of self-determination of individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: While epilepsy can decrease quality of life and self-determination in individuals without intellectual disabilities, the impact of epilepsy on experienced self-determination in people with intellectual disabilities remains unclear. METHOD: We conducted semi-structured interviews with six adults (four men, two women) aged 30-61 with mild intellectual disabilities and drug-resistant epilepsy to investigate their experiences of self-determination. The data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified: (A) I am a competent person with epilepsy; (B) My social needs: being accepted as I am and stability in relationships; and (C) Being in control. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the impact of epilepsy on experienced self-determination of people with mild intellectual disabilities outweighs the influence of intellectual disabilities. Identity formation, friendships with peers, and autonomy support in risk management are identified as important topics in supporting this group.

People with epilepsy and intellectual disability: More than a sum of two conditions.

BACKGROUND: Around 25% of people with Intellectual Disability (PwID) have comorbid epilepsy with seizures in up to two-thirds being drug-resistant. Little is known of the general characteristics and prescribing practices to this population. AIM: Describe and compare characteristics of two cohorts of PwID and epilepsy in two different countries to inform clinical practice better. METHOD: An explorative, retrospective, case-note review in a specialist ID community service in England and in an expert center for PwID and epilepsy in the Netherlands was conducted. Information on ID severity, medical/behavioral/psychiatric/neurodevelopmental/genetic comorbidities, psychotropic, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for each cohort was collected. FINDINGS: The English cohort consisted of 167 people (98 males; age range 18-73 years; mild/moderate ID- 35%) and the Dutch cohort of 189 people (111 males; age range 18-85 years; mild/moderate ID - 51%). The two cohorts were comparable in their baseline characteristics. The Dutch had higher rates of physical comorbidity, but less mental or behavioral disorders and were more likely to be on anti-psychotic medication. The mean dosages between three most common AEDs prescribed were similar. The most frequently prescribed drug in both centers is valproate. Three-quarters of the Dutch were on three or more AEDs compared to a third in the English cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Structured description of the characteristics, differences, and commonalities of PwID, treatment, and services of both countries is presented. This is the first real-world study to reveal unique characteristics of managing epilepsy for a complex ID population. In particular, it highlights the considerable comorbid psychiatric burden and psychotropic prescribing.

European perspective of perampanel response in people with Intellectual Disability.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy prevalence is over 20% for those with ID. It is difficult to diagnose and treat and more likely to be treatment resistant. The evidence informing prescribing is sparse, particularly for new drugs such as perampanel (PMP). AIMS OF THE STUDY: This study seeks to strengthen the research evidence regarding PMP for people with ID by pooling information from two isolated and separately conducted studies: the UK-based Epilepsy Database Register (Ep-ID) and the data from the Kempenhaeghe clinic in the Netherlands. METHODS: A single data set of comparable data was created and analysed under agreement and supervision of a UK statistician. RESULTS: Seizure reduction within twelve months was evident in 62% of Dutch and 47% of UK patients. Retention rates were higher for those in the UK (P = .01) and for patients with moderate to profound ID, whilst side effects were more prominent in the Dutch cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable rates of seizure reduction are in line with estimates for non-ID patients, adding to the evidence suggesting that PMP has a similar impact on those with ID. Taking a European perspective and sharing data across centres can help strengthen the evidence for prescribing antiepileptic drugs in the ID population.

Mood, anxiety, and perceived quality of life in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

OBJECTIVE: Depression and anxiety symptoms are common among patients with epilepsy, but are relatively under-researched in patients with both epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID). The aim was to investigate whether epilepsy and ID characteristics are associated with mood, anxiety, and quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with epilepsy and ID who rely on tertiary epilepsy care were included (N = 189). Mood, anxiety, and quality of life were assessed by standardized questionnaires. Epilepsy and ID characteristics were retrieved from patient charts or determined by psychometric instruments. RESULTS: Elevated levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms were present in 21.7% and 12.7%, respectively. Anxiety was significantly associated with a focal epilepsy type and ID domain discrepancy (substantial difference between two domains of adaptive behavior), but was negatively related to seizure frequency and drug load of mood-stabilizing antiepileptic drugs. Depressive symptoms were not significantly related to epilepsy characteristics, but a severe ID and ID domain discrepancy was associated with more depressive symptoms. Quality of life was significantly worse in those with multiple seizure types and ID domain discrepancy. CONCLUSION: Whereas anxiety and quality of life are associated with individual epilepsy characteristics, this could not be confirmed for depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy and ID, despite its high prevalence.

Reliability and validity of the Dutch Anxiety, Depression And Mood Scale in adults aged <50 years with intellectual disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Reliable and valid screening instruments for depression and anxiety are needed for adults with intellectual disabilities. METHODS: Internal consistency (n = 198), inter-rater reliability (n = 41), test-retest reliability (n = 37) and criterion validity (n = 43) were studied in adults aged between 18 and 49 years. Internal consistency was also studied in a sample with epilepsy (n = 98). RESULTS: Internal consistencies of the Dutch ADAMS total scale and subscales were satisfactory to good (α = 0.76-0.92), as well as in the subgroup with epilepsy (α = 0.74-0.88). Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were fair to excellent for the total scale (ICC's: 0.57-0.84) and subscales (ICC's: 0.43-0.86). The criterion validity of the Dutch ADAMS Depressive Mood subscale was good with a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI: 53%-98%) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI: 64%-90%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the Dutch ADAMS is a reliable and valid instrument for adults aged between 18 and 49 years with intellectual disabilities (and comorbid epilepsy).

Diagnostic exome sequencing in 100 consecutive patients with both epilepsy and intellectual disability.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is highly prevalent among patients with intellectual disability (ID), and seizure control is often difficult. Identification of the underlying etiology in this patient group is important for daily clinical care. We assessed the diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing (WES). In addition, we evaluated which clinical characteristics influence the likelihood of identifying a genetic cause and we assessed the potential impact of the genetic diagnosis on (antiepileptic) treatment strategy. METHODS: One hundred patients with both unexplained epilepsy and (borderline) ID (intelligence quotient ≤ 85) were included. All patients were evaluated by a clinical geneticist, a (pediatric) neurologist, and/or a specialist ID physician. WES analysis was performed in two steps. In step 1, analysis was restricted to the latest versions of ID and/or epilepsy gene panels. In step 2, exome analysis was extended to all genes (so-called full exome analysis). The results were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. RESULTS: In 58 patients, the diagnostic WES analysis reported one or more variant(s). In 25 of the 100 patients, these were classified as (likely) pathogenic, in 24 patients as variants of uncertain significance, and in the remaining patients the variant was most likely not related to the phenotype. In 10 of 25 patients (40%) with a (likely) pathogenic variant, the genetic diagnosis might have an impact on the treatment strategy in the future. SIGNIFICANCE: This study illustrates the clinical diagnostic relevance of WES for patients with both epilepsy and ID. It also demonstrates that implementing WES diagnostics might have impact on the (antiepileptic) treatment strategy in this population. Confirmation of variants of uncertain significance in (candidate) genes may further increase the yield.

Challenging behavior in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability: An analysis of epilepsy characteristics.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to describe the frequency and severity of self-injurious, stereotyped, and aggressive/destructive behavior in adults with both epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID) who reside at a tertiary epilepsy center and to investigate the associations between challenging behavior and epilepsy and ID characteristics. METHOD: The frequency and severity of self-injurious, (motoric) stereotyped, and aggressive/destructive behavior among 189 patients was assessed using the Behavior Problem Inventory. Comparisons were made with an adult reference population with ID, based on gender, to determine whether the behavior was clinically deviant. Epilepsy characteristics, including age at onset, epilepsy type, seizure types, seizure frequency, and use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), were retrieved from patient files. The level of ID was classified using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and an ID domain discrepancy was allocated if there was a substantial difference between two domains of adaptive behavior within a subject. RESULTS: Self-injurious behavior was present in 35% of subjects, stereotyped behavior in 60%, and aggressive/destructive behavior in 63%. The behavior exceeded clinical norms in 7%, 18%, and 12%, respectively. Aggression was the behavior evaluated most often as being problematic, despite its reported frequency being the lowest. When adjusting for level of ID and use of psychotropic medication, logistic regression analyses showed that self-injurious behavior was significantly associated with a lower number of AEDs (odds ratio (OR) = 0.4); that stereotyped behavior was significantly associated with a higher number of seizure types (OR = 1.4) and a lower number of AEDs (OR = 0.4); and that aggression was significantly associated with the presence of an ID domain discrepancy (OR = 3.1). CONCLUSION: Challenging behavior is a serious issue among adults with epilepsy and ID. Although some of the epilepsy and ID characteristics seemed to contribute independently to these types of challenging behavior, the effects of epilepsy-related characteristics are modest when compared with ID.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability: A neglected area.

PURPOSE: To describe the main characteristics of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID), and to analyse the differences regarding psychosocial functioning, epilepsy severity and ID between patients with PNES and a control group without PNES. METHODS: Medical records of adults with ID and epilepsy living at an epilepsy care facility (N = 240) were screened for PNES and evaluated by a neurologist. A control group consisting of patients with epilepsy and ID, without PNES, was matched according to age, sex and level of ID. Characteristics of PNES and epilepsy were provided by the subject's nursing staff or retrieved from patient charts, psychosocial data were collected by standardised questionnaires and level of ID was individually assessed using psychometric instruments. RESULTS: The point prevalence of PNES was 7.1%. The patients with PNES (n = 15) were most often female and had a mild or moderate level of ID. Compared to controls, they showed more depressive symptoms, experienced more negative life events and had more often an ID discrepancy (ID profile with one domain particularly more impaired than another). Stress-related triggers were recognised in a large majority by the nursing staff. CONCLUSION: PNES appears to be a relatively rare diagnostic entity among inpatients with both epilepsy and ID. However, the complexity of diagnosing PNES in this population, and the similarities in stress-related triggers for PNES in patients with and without ID, suggest that PNES may be underdiagnosed in the ID population. Diagnostic challenges of PNES and, as subcategory, reinforced behavioural patterns are discussed.

Accuracy of WISC-III and WAIS-IV short forms in patients with neurological disorders.

The assessment of intellectual abilities is intensive, time-consuming, and might be considered burdensome for patients. We examined psychometric qualities of short forms (SFs) of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (WISC-third edition) and for adults (WAIS-fourth edition), in children (n = 986; Mage = 10.9) and adults (n = 324; Mage = 40.9) with neurological disorders. SF estimates were compared with Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), obtained by a complete administration, for the entire sample and for the subgroups FSIQ < 80 and FSIQ ≥ 80. The FSIQ was correctly identified within ± 7 points in 86% of children and 87% of adults. There were, however, some differences regarding the optimal SF subtest combination between subgroups. Although clinical inferences should not be made, SFs may be useful in research settings to obtain a global estimate of intelligence, and in clinical settings to screen periodically for possible intellectual deterioration.

Evaluation of perampanel in patients with intellectual disability and epilepsy.

INTRODUCTION: Initial registration studies of perampanel (PMP), an AMPA receptor antagonist, have now been followed up by 'clinical' studies that confirmed its efficacy and safety in patients with refractory epilepsy. Publications on the use of PMP among patients with intellectual disability (ID) are still limited. This study extends our knowledge with respect to the relevance of PMP for patients with both ID and epilepsy, and furthermore specifies the behavioral side effects of PMP in this specific population. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of medical records at 3, 6 and 12months of follow-up after the initial start of PMP. RESULTS: 62 patients were included. 21 patients (33.9%) were female. All patients had complete data of 6months follow-up and we were able to review 42 patients with a 1-year follow-up. Level of ID varied from borderline to profound, and mild ID was most common (43.5%). The mean maximum daily dosage of PMP was 5.6mg (range 1-12mg). Retention rates for PMP were 87.1% and 67.7% after three and six months. A trend indicated a longer mean retention time in patients with a more severe ID (borderline-mild-moderate ID: 205days, severe-profound ID: 275days). Seizure reduction was achieved in 53.2%. 36 patients (58.1%) experienced adverse effects, 80.6% of those within 3months. 45.2% of the patients experienced somatic adverse effects. Most common were fatigue & sleep problems, motor problems & unsteadiness, and gastrointestinal problems. Behavioral adverse effects were present in 40.3%. Most common were aggression, agitated behavior, disruptive behavior, and mood symptoms. Reasons for discontinuation of PMP were lack of efficacy in 14.8%, intolerable adverse effects in 44.4%, and a combination of both in 40.7%. Altogether, 24.2% (15/62) of the patients achieved seizure reduction without experiencing adverse effects, though none reached seizure freedom. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PMP might lead to an effective seizure reduction without adverse effects in a minority of patients with both epilepsy and ID. Pre-existing behavioral problems or polypharmacy do not predict the occurrence of additional behavioral adverse effects, implying that these patients need not be excluded from the introduction of PMP when clinically indicated. Patients should, ideally, be monitored at a multidisciplinary clinic.

A systematic review of neuropsychiatric comorbidities in patients with both epilepsy and intellectual disability.

Epilepsy is a neurological condition that is particularly common in people with intellectual disability (ID). The care for people with both epilepsy and ID is often complicated by the presence of neuropsychiatric disorders, defined as psychiatric symptoms, psychiatric disorders, and behavioral problems. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between epilepsy or epilepsy-related factors and neuropsychiatric comorbidities in patients with ID and between ID and neuropsychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy. We performed a systematic review of the literature, published between January 1995 and January 2015 and retrieved from PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, and ERIC and assessed the risk of bias using the SIGN-50 methodology. Forty-two studies were identified, fifteen of which were assessed as having a low or acceptable risk-of-bias evaluation. Neuropsychiatric comorbidities were examined in relation to epilepsy in nine studies; in relation to epilepsy-related factors, such as seizure activity, seizure type, and medication in four studies; and in relation to the presence and degree of ID in five studies. We conclude that the presence of epilepsy only was not a clear determinant of neuropsychiatric comorbidity in patients with ID, although a tendency towards negative mood symptoms was identified. Epilepsy-related factors indicating a more severe form of epilepsy were associated with neuropsychiatric comorbidity as was the presence of ID as compared to those without ID in patients with epilepsy, although this should be validated in future research. A large proportion of the studies in this area is associated with a substantial risk of bias. There is a need for high quality studies using standardized methods to enable clear conclusions to be drawn that might assist in improving the quality of care for this population.