Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11834, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38020744

RESUMO

Alemtuzumab is used as lymphocyte-depleting therapy for severe or glucocorticoid-resistant kidney transplant rejection. However, the long-term efficacy and toxicity of alemtuzumab therapy are unclear. Therefore, all cases of alemtuzumab anti-rejection therapy between 2012 and 2022 in our institution were investigated. Graft survival, graft function, lymphocyte depletion, serious infections, malignancies, and patient survival were analyzed and compared with a reference cohort of transplanted patients who did not require alemtuzumab anti-rejection therapy. A total of 225 patients treated with alemtuzumab were identified and compared with a reference cohort of 1,668 patients. Over 60% of grafts was salvaged with alemtuzumab therapy, but graft survival was significantly poorer compared to the reference cohort. The median time of profound T- and B lymphocyte depletion was 272 and 344 days, respectively. Serious infection rate after alemtuzumab therapy was 54.1/100 person-years. The risk of death (hazard ratio 1.75, 95%-CI 1.28-2.39) and infection-related death (hazard ratio 2.36, 95%-CI 1.35-4.11) were higher in the alemtuzumab-treated cohort. In conclusion, alemtuzumab is an effective treatment for severe kidney transplant rejection, but causes long-lasting lymphocyte depletion and is associated with frequent infections and worse patient survival outcomes.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores , Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Alemtuzumab/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Rejeição de Enxerto
2.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 31(10): 1087-1100, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36175360

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplant rejection remains an important clinical problem despite the development of effective immunosuppressive therapy. Two major types of rejection are recognized, T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which have a different pathophysiology and are treated differently. Unfortunately, long-term outcomes of both TCMR and ABMR remain unsatisfactory despite current therapy. Hence, alternative therapeutic drugs are urgently needed. AREAS COVERED: This review covers novel and investigational drugs for the pharmacological treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Potential therapeutic strategies and future directions are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The development of alternative pharmacologic treatment of rejection has focused mostly on ABMR, since this is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss and currently lacks an effective, evidence-based therapy. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for any of the covered investigational drugs to support their use in ABMR. However, with the emergence of targeted therapies, the potential arises for individualized treatment strategies. In order to generate more high-quality evidence for such strategies and overcome the obstacles of classic randomized controlled trials, we advocate the implementation of adaptive trial designs and surrogate clinical endpoints. We believe such adaptive trial designs could help to understand the risks and benefits of promising drugs such as tocilizumab, clazakizumab, belimumab, and imlifidase.


Assuntos
Nefropatias , Transplante de Rim , Biomarcadores , Drogas em Investigação/efeitos adversos , Rejeição de Enxerto/tratamento farmacológico , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Rim , Nefropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos
4.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1652021 04 08.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33914430

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the incidence, risk factors and avoidability of acute kidney injury in adult patients admitted to a Dutch hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHOD: We assessed all consecutive admissions in our clinic during one week for the development of acute kidney injury and its cause. We compared medical information between patients with and without acute kidney injury to identify risk factors. We reviewed whether the current advice on kidney injury was followed to estimate the avoidability of acute kidney injury. RESULTS: 347 patients were older than 18 years and admitted for more than 1 day. Acute kidney injury occurred in 16.4% of patients. Almost half of the patients already developed acute kidney injury at home, before admission. Acute kidney damage was encountered in all medical specialties. Chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and heart failure were significantly more common in patients with acute kidney injury. Patients with acute kidney injury used significantly more RAS-inhibitors and loop diuretics. The renal function completely restored in half of cases. Two thirds of acute kidney injury was probably avoidable if volume depletion had been optimized or medication with hemodynamic effects had been adjusted in time according to the guidelines. CONCLUSION: Acute kidney injury is not only a common and underestimated problem in the daily practice of all doctors, but it is also probably avoidable. Awareness of the risk of acute kidney injury by doctors, pharmacists and patients can contribute to the reduction of acute kidney injury and its serious consequences.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA