RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment of obesity in primary care may help to tackle the obesity pandemic. Nonetheless, GPs frequently fail to address obesity and demonstrate limited adherence to guidelines. AIM: To explore Dutch GPs' perspectives on addressing obesity regarding the following three target behaviours: discussing weight; diagnosing; and referring patients with obesity. DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative focus group study with Dutch GPs. METHOD: Six focus groups were conducted with a purposive sample of 21 GPs. Thematic analysis was performed using deductive coding, according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS: For discussing weight, the main barriers identified were a presented complaint unrelated to obesity (environmental context and resources), concerns about a negative response from the patient (beliefs about consequences), and worries about obesity being a sensitive subject to discuss (emotions). A long-term trustworthy relationship (social influences) facilitated discussing weight. For diagnosing patients with obesity, the main barriers were related to resources; for example, lack of (appropriate) measuring equipment and time (environmental context and resources). For referring patients with obesity, the main barriers were no referral options nearby (environmental context and resources), and doubts about the positive effects of the referral on weight change (beliefs about consequences). CONCLUSION: Different barriers for discussing weight, diagnosing, and referring patients with obesity were identified, underscoring the importance for tailored interventions to these specific behaviours. Improving knowledge and skills of GPs seems insufficient as this study showed that particular attention should be paid to establishing long-term relationships, addressing GPs' beliefs about consequences, and creating a supportive environment with sufficient time and resources.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is unclear to what extent mental health and negative life events (NLEs) contribute to weight change in patients with overweight. This study aimed to evaluate the association of anxiety, depression, NLEs and quality of life (QoL) with weight change over ten years in middle-aged individuals with overweight. METHODS: Population-based cohort study of 2889 middle-aged men and women with a body mass index ≥27 kg/m2. Relative weight change over ten years was defined as weight loss (≤- 5 %), stable weight (between >- 5 % and <5 %) or weight gain (≥5 %). At baseline, participants reported anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, recent (last year) and distant (lifetime) NLEs, and a mental component summary of QoL. With multinomial logistic regression adjusting for potential confounding, we examined the association of mental health and NLEs with weight change after a median (25th, 75th percentiles) follow-up of 9.7 (9.0-10.5) years. RESULTS: In 51 % participants weight was stable, 33 % participants lost weight and 17 % gained weight. Mild (odds ratio 1.36; 95 % confidence interval 1.05-1.75), and moderate to very severe depressive symptoms (1.43; 0.97-2.12) and four or more distant NLEs (1.35; 1.10-1.67) were associated with weight gain. Anxiety symptoms, the mental component summary of QoL were not associated with either weight gain or weight loss. LIMITATIONS: Due to the observational design residual confounding cannot be excluded. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that depressive symptoms or having experienced distant NLEs are associated with weight gain over time in middle-aged individuals with overweight. These subgroups might benefit from proactive attention from their health care providers.