Clusters of resilience and vulnerability: executive functioning, coping and mental distress in patients with diffuse low-grade glioma.

PURPOSE: Diffuse low-grade gliomas (dLGG) often have a frontal location, which may negatively affect patients' executive functions (EF). Being diagnosed with dLGG and having to undergo intensive treatment can be emotionally stressful. The ability to cope with this stress in an adaptive, active and flexible way may be hampered by impaired EF. Consequently, patients may suffer from increased mental distress. The aim of the present study was to explore profiles of EF, coping and mental distress and identify characteristics of each profile. METHODS: 151 patients with dLGG were included. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to explore profiles. Additional demographical, tumor and radiological characteristics were included. RESULTS: Four clusters were found: 1) overall good functioning (25% of patients); 2) poor executive functioning, good psychosocial functioning (32%); 3) good executive functioning, poor psychosocial functioning (18%) and; 4) overall poor functioning (25%). Characteristics of the different clusters were lower educational level and more (micro)vascular brain damage (cluster 2), a younger age (cluster 3), and a larger tumor volume (cluster 4). EF was not a distinctive factor for coping, nor was it for mental distress. Maladaptive coping, however, did distinguish clusters with higher mental distress (cluster 3 and 4) from clusters with lower levels of mental distress (cluster 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: Four distinctive clusters with different levels of functioning and characteristics were identified. EF impairments did not hinder the use of active coping strategies. Moreover, maladaptive coping, but not EF impairment, was related to increased mental distress in patients with dLGG.

Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation.

Proton therapy is a promising modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI), offering dosimetric advantages over conventional treatments. While significant attention has been paid to spine fields, for the brain fields, only dose reduction to the lens of the eye has been reported. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess the potential gains and feasibility of adopting different treatment planning techniques for the entire brain within the CSI target. To this end, eight previously treated CSI patients underwent retrospective replanning using various techniques: (1) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization, (2) the modification/addition of field directions, and (3) the pre-optimization removal of superficially placed spots. The target coverage robustness was evaluated and dose comparisons for lenses, cochleae, and scalp were conducted, considering potential biological dose increases. The target coverage robustness was maintained across all plans, with minor reductions when superficial spot removal was utilized. Single- and multifield optimization showed comparable target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. A significant scalp sparing was achieved in adults but only limited in pediatric cases. Superficial spot removal contributed to scalp V30 Gy reduction at the expense of lower coverage robustness in specific cases. Lens sparing benefits from multiple field directions, while cochlear sparing remains impractical. Based on the results, all investigated plan types are deemed clinically adoptable.

Spatial distribution of cerebral microbleeds and FLAIR hyperintensities on follow-up MRI after radiotherapy for lower grade glioma.

Background and purpose: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and fluid-attenuated-inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensities on brain MRI scans after radiotherapy (RT) are considered markers for microvascular damage and related cognitive changes. However, the spatial distribution using existing scoring systems as well as colocation of these imaging biomarkers remain unclear, hampering clinical interpretation. This study aims to elucidate the distribution and colocation of these markers in patients with lower grade glioma (LGG). Materials and methods: CMBs were spatially classified on retrospective 1.5 T susceptibility weighted MRI scans according to the existing Microbleed Anatomical Rating Scale (MARS) and were additionally scored for being located in hippocampus, amygdala, cortex, white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), WM/GM junction and for their spatial relation to FLAIR hyperintensities. Scoring was performed for whole, ipsilateral and contralateral cerebrum (with respect to tumour bulk). Results: Fifty-one scans were included of which 28 had at least one CMB. The majority of CMBs were localized in the lobar area and in deep and periventricular white matter (DPWM) - generally in WM. Only few CMBs were found in GM. In scans obtained up to 7 years after RT completion the majority of CMBs were not colocalized with FLAIR hyperintensities. Conclusion: CMBs and FLAIR hyperintensities appear to be separate imaging biomarkers for radiation therapy induced microvascular damage, as they are not colocalized in patients with LGG, especially not early on after completion of RT.