Dual immunoadsorption for ABO-incompatible heart transplantation in a 35 kg child.

Intraoperative anti-A/B immunoadsorption (ABO-IA) was recently introduced for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) heart transplantation. Here we report the first case of a patient transplanted with ABO-IA, that was of an age and weight that required two ABO-IA columns run in parallel, to enable the reduction in antibody titres to a sufficiently low level in the time available during implantation of the donor organ.

Bidirectional ABO Mismatch Is Associated With Elevated Mortality in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Insights From a Single-Center Experience.

Background Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a promising therapy for various disorders and provides new opportunities for patients. ABO incompatibility in allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) remains a topic of debate because of its potential impact on clinical outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the survival outcomes of patients who underwent ABO-incompatible HSCT and evaluate the occurrence of pure red cell aplasia. Methods This retrospective study included 20 patients who underwent ABO-incompatible HSCT. Data on patient characteristics, transplant details, and follow-ups were collected. Conditioning regimens and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategies were employed. Results Neutrophil and platelet engraftment durations did not differ significantly between major and bidirectional mismatches. Pure red cell aplasia occurred in 4 patients (20%) with major mismatches, all of whom responded well to bortezomib treatment. Patients with a bidirectional mismatch exhibited a 3.57-fold increase (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28; p<0.05) in the risk of mortality compared to those in the major mismatch group. Conclusion The results indicate that ABO mismatch, whether bidirectional or major, does not significantly affect neutrophil and platelet engraftment duration, suggesting that ABO incompatibility may not be a major factor influencing hematological recovery in allo-HSCT. Interestingly, patients with bidirectional mismatch exhibited a significantly higher mortality rate than those with major mismatch. This finding suggests that a bidirectional ABO mismatch may have an unfavorable prognosis in terms of overall survival in allo-HSCT patients.

Successful treatment of a pure red cell aplasia patient following ABO-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a sibling donor with multiple sclerosis.

Despite the importance of blood group compatibility in solid organ transplantation, the role of ABO antigens is less critical in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, ABO-mismatch HSCT can present specific conditions and challenges for the recipient. One of the possible consequences of ABO-mismatch HSCT is pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). Although there are different treatment strategies to manage PRCA, each may carry its own risk. Here, we report a patient who developed PRCA after ABO-mismatch allogeneic HSCT from her sibling with multiple sclerosis history. PRCA improved with tapering immunosuppressive agents. Although the patient developed manageable graft versus host disease (GVHD), she eventually recovered from both PRCA and GVHD.

Donor-type red blood cell transfusion to deplete isoagglutinins prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation from ABO major incompatible bone marrow donors.

ABO incompatibility affects approximately 40% of allogeneic stem cell transplants in Caucasian patient populations. Because bone marrow (BM), the preferred graft from paediatric sibling donors and for non-malignant diseases, has a red blood cell (RBC) content similar to blood, anti-donor isoagglutinins must either be depleted from the recipient or RBCs removed from the graft. To achieve tolerability of unmanipulated BM grafts, we used controlled infusions of donor ABO-type RBC units to deplete isoagglutinins before the transplant. This retrospective study evaluates the outcomes of 52 ABO major incompatible BM transplants performed at our centre between 2007 and 2019. The use of donor-type RBC transfusions was well tolerated. They effectively reduced isoagglutinins levels, typically achieving target titres after one (60%) or two (29%) transfusions. The approach allowed for successful and uneventful infusions of unmanipulated BM which provided timely engraftment. The transplant outcomes were not inferior to those of a matched-pair control group of patients with ABO-identical donors.

Treatment for pure red cell aplasia after major ABO-incompatible allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a multicentre study.

Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) with major ABO incompatibility is responsible for transfusion dependent anaemia, impaired quality of life and iron overload. We conducted a retrospective study, over a 10-year period, which included all consecutive patients who received a major ABO mismatched aHSCT, to assess the impact of specific treatment on PRCA. We did not observe any PRCA in the 57 aHSCT issued from cord blood. Among the remaining 631 patients, cumulative incidence of PRCA was 10·5% [range 8·2-13.0]. The median duration of resolved PRCA was 171 days [IQR 116; 261]. Pre-transplant high isohaemagglutinins titre was associated with an increased risk of PRCA (P < 10-4 ). PRCA did not affect overall survival (P = 0·95). Twenty-two patients (33·3%) received at least one specific treatment. The most commonly used treatments were rituximab (17 patients) and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; seven patients). Regarding PRCA resolution, we did not observe a significant difference between treated or untreated subjects (HR = 0·93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·48- 1·80; P = 0·82). Similar results were observed with erythropoietin treatment (22 patients, HR = 0·86 95% CI: [0·47-1·57] P = 0·62). Our data do not support the use of erythropoietin, rituximab or DLI for the treatment of PRCA.

Effects of ABO incompatibility in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of ABO mismatch on outcomes following allo-HSCT remains controversial. In this study, our aim is to define the effect of ABO mismatch on post-transplant outcomes, engraftment kinetics and complications in a large cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 1000 patients who underwent allo-HSCT from either bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells at our center between 1988 and 2016. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety (59%) patient-donor pairs were ABO matched, 164 (16.4%) were ABO major mismatched (MM), 191 (19.1%) were ABO minor MM, and 55 (5.5%) were ABO bi-directionally MM. ABO matched pairs were more common in transplants from related donors (P<0.001) and using bone marrow as a stem cell source (P<0.001). In minor ABO MM transplantations, mild delayed hemolytic reaction occurred more frequently compared to major and bidirectional ABO MM transplantations (47% vs 35% and 18%, P<0.001). Neutrophil engraftment was slightly delayed in ABO MM patient-donor pairs when compared ABO matched donor pairs according to median engraftment time in all group (167/410, 41% vs 204/590, 35%, P=0.046). Pure red cell aplasia was diagnosed in 6 patients (1%). Higher risk of death was shown in ABO MM transplants compared to ABO matched transplants in overall survival (OS) analysis (HR:1.201, 95% CI:1.004-1.437, P=0.045). The non-relapse mortality (P=0.546) and cumulative incidences of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) and chronic (c) GVHD were comparable between ABO MM and ABO matched patient-donor pairs (for aGVHD, P=0.235; for cGVHD, P=0.137). CONCLUSION: ABO MM transplants were associated with decreased OS and slightly delayed neutrophil engraftment. NRM and the risk of GVHD were not related to ABO incompatibility.

Transfusing maternal blood to her newborn baby-irrespective of ABO mismatch.

Background: Though blood transfusions are the common procedures in pediatric patients, transfusion reactions are rare in children. Though in adults, uncross-matched ABO group-specific blood is used in emergencies, there are no such reports in neonates and children. There are stray case reports about transfusing maternal blood for her baby and maternal blood is de facto compatible regardless of an ABO mismatchObjective: Confirming our previous hypothesis that maternal blood is compatible with her baby's blood; and maternal blood can be used for transfusion in her newborn baby irrespective of ABO match/ mismatch.Design: Prospective interventional study.Setting and Participants: Fifty-one mother-baby pairs were recruited attending Pediatric Unit of our Community Hospital from 15 July 2013 to 13 July 2015. After obtaining consent from the parents, all the required lab tests were done. Since all lab reports were favourable; these babies qualified for transfusion of maternal blood.Interventions: Fifty-one sick newborns were transfused fresh whole maternal blood as a part of treatment; irrespective of mother-baby ABO match or mismatch.Results: All babies tolerated maternal blood well and showed significant and rapid improvement. Minimum period of observation was from a minimum of 32 to a maximum of 56 months. All the babies showed good growth and development.Conclusion: By observing a particular protocol and procedural techniques, mother's blood may be used for transfusion in her own baby in neonatal period, irrespective of ABO mismatch.Significance: This is probably the largest series in world literature of 51 newborns being transfused maternal blood either ABO match or mismatch.

ABO Blood Grouping Mismatch in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Clinical Guides.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a useful treatment. In contrast to solid organ transplantations, the use of ABO blood group mismatch is acceptable in HSCT. Immediate or late hemolytic reactions, pure red cell aplasia, delayed red blood cell recovery, and graft-versus -host disease are the results of this situation. This review shows the consequences of ABO-mismatched HSCT and its impacts on HSCT parameters, as well as providing clinical guides in this situation.

A novel method for ABO-incompatible heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Since 1996, ABO-incompatible heart transplantation has been undertaken by performing whole-body plasma exchange to remove isohemagglutinins using the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit at the time of transplantation. This requires large volumes of donated blood and blood products, causes hemodynamic instability during the exchange transfusion, and limits practical use to small children. We sought to determine the efficacy of anti-A/B immunoadsorption within the CPB circuit on removal of isohemagglutinins in an ex vivo setting before its use clinically. METHODS: An anti-A/B immunoadsorption column was placed into a CPB circuit mimicking a typical ABO-incompatible transplant patient, which had been primed with type O whole human blood. Samples were taken for determination of isohemagglutinin titers following each plasma volume pass through the anti-A/B immunoadsorption column. RESULTS: There was a linear decrease of at least 1 dilution seen in both anti-A and anti-B IgG and IgM antibodies with each plasma volume pass through the column. This predictable removal allowed the formulation of selection criteria for ABO-incompatible heart transplantation given the reciprocal of titer and patient weight. This degree of predictability allowed us to use it successfully in the clinical setting, reducing antibodies to an undetectable level during ABO-incompatible heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of an anti-A/B immunoadsorption column into the extracorporeal circuit reduces allogeneic blood product requirement for ABO-incompatible heart transplantation, while providing efficacious removal of anti-A and anti-B isohemagglutinins. This can be undertaken within the time period of CPB before graft reperfusion and expands the potential recipient pool to larger patients with higher isohemagglutinin titers.

Higher Anti-A/B isoagglutinin titers of IgG class, but not of IgM, are associated with increased red blood cell transfusion requirements in bone marrow transplantation with major ABO-mismatch.

BACKGROUND: Major ABO mismatch between donor and recipient in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) may cause hemolysis, delayed red blood cell (RBC) engraftment and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), which result in increased transfusion needs. High pretransplant anti-A/B antibody titers have been associated with increased risk of PRCA. Herein, we studied the impact of anti-A/B titers on transfusion needs after BMT with major ABO mismatch. METHODS: We reviewed the medical charts of 27 patients who underwent to BMT with major ABO mismatch and categorized them into two groups according to anti-A/B titers of IgG (≤16 and ≥32). We recorded the number of RBC and platelet units transfused in the first 180 days after transplantation. We also evaluated the impact of anti-A/B titers on overall survival. RESULTS: Patients with anti-A/B titer ≥32 of IgG class required more RBC transfusion than patients with titer ≤16 (6.60±4.55 vs 21.29±14.68; P=.03). Anti-A/B of IgM class had no impact on both RBC and platelet transfusion needs. Anti-A/B titers had no impact on overall survival. CONCLUSION: Higher titers of anti-A/B antibodies of IgG class, but not of IgM, are associated with a higher demand for RBC transfusion.

ABO blood group mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Apart from solid organ transplantations, use of ABO-blood group mismatched (ABO-mismatched) donors is acceptable in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. About 20-40% of allogeneic HSCT recipients will receive grafts from ABO-mismatched donors. ABO incompatible HSCT procedures are associated with immediate and late consequences, including but not restricted to acute or delayed hemolytic reactions, delayed red blood cell recovery, pure red cell aplasia and graft-versus-host disease. This review summarizes the current knowledge about consequences of ABO-mismatched HSCT in terms of associated complications and will evaluate its impact on important outcome parameters of HSCT.

Nonmyeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation with Alemtuzumab/Low-Dose Irradiation to Cure and Improve the Quality of Life of Adults with Sickle Cell Disease.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is rarely performed in adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). We utilized the chemotherapy-free, alemtuzumab/total body irradiation 300 cGy regimen with sirolimus as post-transplantation immunosuppression in 13 high-risk SCD adult patients between November 2011 and June 2014. Patients received matched related donor (MRD) granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells, including 2 cases that were ABO incompatible. Quality-of-life (QoL) measurements were performed at different time points after HSCT. All 13 patients initially engrafted. A stable mixed donor/recipient chimerism was maintained in 12 patients (92%), whereas 1 patient not compliant with sirolimus experienced secondary graft failure. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 12 to 44 months) there was no mortality, no acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and no grades 3 or 4 extramedullary toxicities. At 1 year after transplantation, patients with stable donor chimerism have normalized hemoglobin concentrations and improved cardiopulmonary and QoL parameters including bodily pain, general health, and vitality. In 4 patients, sirolimus was stopped without rejection or SCD-related complications. These results underscore the successful use of a chemotherapy-free regimen in MRD HSCT for high-risk adult SCD patients and demonstrates a high cure rate, absence of GVHD or mortality, and improvement in QoL including the applicability of this regimen in ABO mismatched cases (NCT number 01499888).

Clinico-serologic co-relation in bi-directional ABO incompatible hemopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The ABO blood group system is of prime significance in red cell transfusion and organ transplantation. However, ABO compatibility is not critical in allogenic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and approximately 40-50% of hemopoietic stem cell transplants are ABO incompatible. This incompatibility may be major, minor or bi-directional. Though there are descriptions of transfusion practice and protocols in ABO incompatible HSCT, there are considerable variations and transfusion support in these patients can be very challenging. AIMS: The immunohematologic observations in two cases of bi-directional ABO incompatible HSCT have been described, and clinico-serologic correlation has been attempted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In both cases, peripheral blood stem cell harvests were obtained using the Cobe spectra cell separator. Immunohematologic assessments in the donor and recipient were done as a part of pre HSCT evaluation. Both the standard tube technique and column agglutination method (Ortho Biovue Micro Bead System) was used. Antibody screen was done by column agglutination method using three cell panel (Surgiscreen cells). Isoagglutinin titration was done by the master dilution method and standard validated techniques were used. RESULTS: The pattern of laboratory findings in the two cases was different and so were the clinical outcomes. Although there was early engraftment in the first case, the second case developed pure red cell aplasia and this was well-reflected in the immunohematologic assessments. CONCLUSION: Immunohematologic assessment correlated well with the clinical picture and could be used to predict clinical outcome and onset of complications in ABO incompatible HSCT.

ABO mismatch is associated with increased nonrelapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We evaluated ABO associated outcomes in 1737 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) at Stanford University between January 1986 and July 2011. Grafts were 61% ABO matched, 18% major mismatched (MM), 17% minor MM, and 4% bidirectional MM. Median follow-up was 6 years. In multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was inferior in minor MM hematopoietic cell transplantations (median 2.1 versus 6.3 years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 2.05; P = .001) in comparison with ABO-matched grafts. ABO minor MM was associated with an increase in early nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (18% versus 13%; HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.06; P = .02). In an independent Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) analysis of 435 lymphoma patients receiving mobilized peripheral blood grafts, impairment of OS (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.25; P = .021) and increased NRM (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.68; P = .03) were observed in recipients of ABO minor-MM grafts. A second independent analysis of a CIBMTR data set including 5179 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome identified a nonsignificant trend toward decreased OS in recipients of ABO minor-MM grafts and also found ABO major MM to be significantly associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.31; P < .001) and increased NRM (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.4; P = .002). ABO minor and major MM are risk factors for worse transplantation outcomes, although the associated hazards may not be uniform across different transplantation populations. Further study is warranted to determine which patient populations are at greatest risk, and whether this risk can be modified by anti-B cell therapy or other peri-transplantation treatments.