[Improving the experience of racialized immigrant seniors in Quebec]. / Améliorer l'expérience des personnes âgées immigrantes racialisées au Québec.

In Quebec, racialized immigrant seniors (AIRs) are a significant presence in long-term care facilities (CHSLDs) in the Greater Montreal area. To identify interventions that best meet their needs, this study interviewed 12 RIAs, including their families, about their experience in CHSLDs. The results show that RIAs face three challenges: food, clothing and play. Addressing these issues could improve their LTRCC experience.

[Eritema pigmentado fijo secundario a AINE: Reporte de caso].

Background: Fixed erythema pigmento (FPE) is an allergic drug reaction, the pathophysiology of which is not exactly known. It is more common in women with location on the face. Clinical presentation: round or oval red-purple macule, well defined, with swelling, pain, itching, and burning. Diagnosis is clinical, oral chal- lenge is contraindicated due to possible severe reaction. On withdrawal of the drug, residual violaceous hyperpigmentation remains. Case report: 34-year-old female diagnosed with allergic rhinitis and asthma. She received treatment with ibuprofen and cephalexin 1 month ago due to dental infection. For the past 2 weeks, she has presented dermatological lesions characterized by hyperpigmentation under the lower eyelids, accompanied by pain, burning, and itching. On physical examination, well-defined red-purple pigmentation was observed in both periocular regions. The challenge test is not justified, the clinical history is the diagnostic pillar. The indication is to stop the medication immediately and continue monitoring. Conclusions: EPF is a drug reaction related to drug use. It creates a challenge for diagnosis due to poor knowledge of the characteristics of the dermatosis and poor clinical and pharmacological questioning. The EPF approach requires knowing the clinical characteristics of this dermatosis, making a differential diagnosis with other lesions and indicating the suspension of the responsible medication.

Antecedentes: El eritema pigmentado fijo (EPF) es una reacción alérgica medicamentosa, de la cual no se conoce con exactitud la fisiopatología. Es más frecuente en la mujer con localización en la cara. Presentación clínica: mácula redonda u oval de color rojo-violáceo, bien delimitada, con edema con dolor, prurito y ardor. El diagnóstico es clínico, contraindicado el reto oral por posible reacción grave. Al retirar el fármaco, queda una hiperpigmentación residual violácea. Reporte de caso: Femenina de 34 años con diagnóstico de rinitis alérgica y asma, Recibió tratamiento con Ibuprofeno y cefalexina hace 1 mes debido a proceso infeccioso dental. Desde hace 2 semanas presenta lesiones dermatológicas caracterizadas por hiperpigmentación debajo de párpados inferiores, acompañado de dolor, ardor y prurito. A la exploración física en ambas regiones perioculares se observa pigmentación bien delimitada rojo-violáceo. La prueba de reto no se justifica, la historia clínica es el pilar diagnóstico. La indicación es suspender el medicamento de inmediato y vigilancia continua. Conclusiones: El EPF es una reacción a medicamentos relacionada con el consumo de fármacos. Genera un desafío para el diagnóstico debido al pobre conocimien- to de las características de la dermatosis y un deficiente interrogatorio clínico y farmacológico. El abordaje del EPF requiere conocer las características clínicas de esta dermatosis, realizar el diagnostico diferencial con otras lesiones e indicar la suspensión del medicamento responsable.

Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Olecranon bursitis (OB), characterized by inflammation and fluid collection in the olecranon bursa is a commonly encountered out-patient condition. The data is heterogeneous regarding a stepwise and standardized approach to aseptic OB treatment and the efficacy of intra-bursal corticosteroid injections (CSI). The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the non-surgical treatment options for aseptic OB. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. The English and non-English literature search was performed in 5 medical databases to identify studies evaluating the treatment of OB. All included studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB) using the revised Cochrane RoB tool for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control and cohort studies. RESULTS: For the final analyses, 2 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. The RoB for the RCTs was high and both failed to demonstrate a significant difference in terms of the resolution of OB and bursal tenderness among various invasive and non-invasive treatment options. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with a significant decline in the duration of symptoms. However, it was associated with a higher number of complications including bursal infection and skin atrophy. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, it appears that the clinical resolution of aseptic OB can occur with conservative methods if implemented earlier in the disease course. Although CSI is more effective than other treatments, it should be reserved for refractory cases because of a higher complication rate.

Effectiveness of the therapeutic laser in the syndrome of dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint of arthrogenic origin / Eficacia del láser terapéutico en el síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular de origen artrogénico

Abstract Temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome (TMD), is a collective term characterized by symptoms involving chewing muscles, temporomandibular joint and orofacial structures. The efficacy of low intensity laser (LLLT) Gallium arsenide, in combination with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was evaluated. The main objective was to evaluate the maximum mouth opening without pain (ABM), arthralgia in the joint capsule through visual analog scale (VAS), laterality, protrusion, joint noises and count of tablets ingested per group. A controlled clinical trial (double-blind-randomized) was carried out in 30 subjects, who presented DTM of arthrogenic etiology; 5 applications of LLLT were made with wavelength of 810 nm, output optical power of 100-200 mw, emission PW=Pulsed (1-10,000Hz), dose of 10 jouls-cm², time of 1.44 minutes in mouth closed and with the mouth half open. One more follow-up appointment per month. There were two groups: experimental and control group, where different variables were analyzed (ABM, laterality, protrusion, VAS and sociodemographic). In the control group, a supposed LT application (not active) was made, for later comparison. Pain-free ABM was assessed in all appointments in addition to the other clinical parameters. Repeated measures analysis was performed with mixed models. Thirty patients were included of which 28 finished the treatment, two of them were lost during follow-up. The groups were similar in all their baseline variables. There were no statistically significant differences when applying the final multiple regression analysis, in the ABM, or in any other of the clinical parameters analyzed. LT was not effective in treating arthrogenic DTM.

Resumen El síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular (DTM) es un término colectivo caracterizado por síntomas que involucran músculos de la masticación, articulación temporomandibular y estructuras orofaciales. Se evaluó la eficacia del láser de baja intensidad (LLLT) Arseniuro de galio, en combinación con un antiinflamatorio no esteroideo (AINE). El objetivo principal fue evaluar la apertura bucal máxima sin dolor (ABM), la artralgia en cápsula articular a través de escala visual análoga (EVA), lateralidades, protrusión, ruidos articulares y conteo de tabletas ingeridas por grupo. Se realizó un ensayo clínico controlado (doble ciego-aleatorizado) en 30 sujetos, que presentaban DTM de etiología artrogénica; se les realizaron 5 aplicaciones de LLLT con longitud de onda de 810 nm, potencia óptica de salida de 100-200 mw, emisión PW=Pulsed (1-10,000Hz), dosis de10 jouls-cm², tiempo de1.44 minutos a boca cerrada y con la boca semiabierta. Una cita más de seguimiento al mes. Se tuvieron dos grupos: experimental y grupo control, donde se analizaron diferentes variables (ABM, lateralidades, protrusión, EVA y sociodemográficas). En el grupo control se hizo una supuesta aplicación LT (no activo), para posterior comparación. En todas las citas se valoró la ABM sin dolor además de los otros parámetros clínicos. Se realizó análisis de medidas repetidas con modelos mixtos. Se incluyeron 30 pacientes de los cuales 28 finalizaron el tratamiento, dos de ellos se perdieron en el seguimiento. Los grupos fueron similares en todas sus variables basales. No hubo diferencias estadísticas significativas al aplicar los análisis de regresión múltiple finales, en la ABM, ni tampoco en ningún otro de los parámetros clínicos analizados. El LT no fue eficaz en el tratamiento de la DTM de origen artrogénico.

Anti-inflammatories for delayed onset muscle soreness: systematic review and meta-analysis / Antiinflamatorios para el dolor muscular de inicio tardío: revisión sistemática y metanálisis / Anti-inflamatórios para dor muscular de início tardio: revisão sistemática e metanálise

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in the treatment of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Data sources: The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for RCTs published prior to August 3, 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies that 1) used an RCT design; 2) evaluated the effectiveness of steroidal or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating DOMS; and 3) therapeutically used drugs after exercise were included. Results: In total, 26 studies (patients = 934) were eligible for inclusion in the qualitative analysis on the treatment of DOMS. The results of the meta-analysis showed no superiority between the use and non-use of NSAIDs in the improvement of late muscle pain, as no statistically significant differences were verified (21 studies, n= 955; standard mean difference (SMD)= 0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.58, 0.63; p=0.94; I2=93%). The quality of the synthesized evidence was very low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, and there was significant heterogeneity among the included studies. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that NSAIDs are not superior to controls/placebos in treating DOMS. The inclusion of both studies with dose-response protocols and those with exercise protocols may have influenced the results. In addition, the high risk of bias identified reveals that limitations need to be considered when interpreting the results. Level of evidence I; ystematic review of RCT (Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trials).

RESUMEN Objetivo: Investigar la efectividad de las intervenciones farmacológicas en el tratamiento del dolor muscular de aparición tardía (DOMS). Metodología: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis de ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorios (RCT). Fuentes de datos: Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos de PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo y Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) para ECA publicados antes del 3 de agosto de 2020. Criterios de elegibilidad para la selección de estudios: Estudios en los que 1) se utilizó un diseño de RCT; 2) se evaluó la eficacia de los fármacos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) y esteroideos en el tratamiento de DOMS; y 3) se incluyó el uso terapéutico de medicamentos para dolor después del ejercicio. Resultados: En total, 26 estudios (pacientes = 934) fueron elegibles para su inclusión en el análisis cualitativo sobre el tratamiento de DOMS. Los resultados encontrados en el metanálisis no demostraron superioridad entre el uso y no uso de AINE para mejorar el dolor muscular tardío cuando se comparó con una condición de control, ya que no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (21 estudios, n = 955; media estándar diferencia = 0,02; intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95% −0,58, 0,63; p = 0,94; I2 = 93%). La calidad de la evidencia encontrada se clasificó como muy baja según los criterios del "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE), principalmente porque existe una heterogeneidad significativa entre los estudios incluidos. Conclusión: Los resultados demuestran que los AINE no son superiores a los controles o placebos en el tratamiento de DOMS. La inclusión de ambos modelos de estudio con protocolos de dosis-respuesta y protocolos de ejercicio puede haber influido en los resultados. Además, el alto riesgo de sesgo identificado revela que la interpretación de los resultados debe verse con limitaciones. Nivel de evidencia: I; Revisión sistemática de ECRC (Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y controlados).

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a eficácia das intervenções farmacológicas no tratamento da dor muscular de início tardio (DOMS). Desenho: Revisão sistemática e metanálise de estudos clínicos randomizados e controlados (RCTs). Fontes de dados: Os bancos de dados PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo e Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) foram pesquisados em busca de RCTs publicados antes de 3 de agosto de 2020. Critérios de elegibilidade para selecionar estudos: Estudos que 1) usaram um desenho de RCT; 2) avaliaram a eficácia de anti-inflamatórios esteroides ou não esteroides (AINEs) no tratamento de DOMS e 3) incluíram tratamento medicamentoso depois de exercício. Resultados: No total, 26 estudos (pacientes = 934) foram elegíveis para inclusão na análise qualitativa do tratamento de DOMS. Os resultados da metanálise não mostraram superioridade entre o uso e não uso de AINEs na melhora da dor muscular tardia, pois não foram verificadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas (21 estudos, n = 955; diferença média padronizada (SMD) = 0,02; Intervalo de confiança (IC) de 95% −0,58, 0,63; p = 0,94; I2 = 93%). A qualidade da evidência encontrada foi muito baixa de acordo com os critérios da Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), e verificou-se heterogeneidade significante entre os estudos incluídos. Conclusão: Os resultados demonstram que os AINEs não são superiores aos controles ou placebos no tratamento de DOMS. A inclusão de estudos com protocolos de dose-resposta e com protocolos de exercícios podem ter influenciado os resultados. Além disso, o alto risco de viés identificado revela que as limitações devem ser consideradas na interpretação dos resultados. Nível de evidência I; Revisão sistemática de ECRC (Estudos clínicos randomizados e controlados).

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the elderly. Agreement with safe prescription recommendations according to cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs are the cornerstone in the treatment of acute and chronic pain due to inflammation in musculoskeletal conditions. Even though adverse side-effects are associated, their use is common in the elderly patients. Our aim is to determine the prescription trend of NSAIDs, the evaluation for gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks, and the level of agreement with prescription guidelines. METHODS: We conducted an observation and descriptive study in a general hospital geriatrics consultation. RESULTS: From the 231 patients only 59 patients had a NSAIDs prescription. The most frequently prescribed was Acetaminophen, in 29(49.1%) patients, Celecoxib was prescribed in 11(18.6%) patients, Piroxicam in 5(8.4%) patients, Acetaminophen plus Celecoxib plus Omeprazole in 4 (6.7%), Acetaminophen plus Piroxicam in 2 (0.3%) patients, and Acetaminophen plus Diclofenac plus Celecoxib in 1 patient (1.6%). In the Framingham risk classification there were 160/231 (69.3%) patients in Very High Risk and 71/231 (30.7%) patients in High Risk. There were no patients in Low Risk. GI Risk: 79 patients (34.1%) had a peptic ulcer disease history. There were 55/231 (23.8%) in the High GI Risk classification, 102/231 (44.1%) in Intermediate GI Risk and 74/231 (32%) in the Low Risk. The level of agreement between the prescribed versus recommended NSAIDs according the CV and GI risks was measured with a contingence table and the kappa statistic of 0.37 p=0.001. CONCLUSION: There is a low level of agreement between prescribed and recommended NSAID in elderly population.

Factores asociados con el uso de inhibidores del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa en una población de pacientes colombianos con espondiloartritis / Factors associated with the use of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in a population of Colombian patients with spondyloarthritis

RESUMEN Introducción: El uso de TNFi es cada vez más frecuente en los pacientes con espondiloartritis. Identificar tempranamente aquellos que los requerirán o poder predecir su uso puede ayudar a hacer un tratamiento más efectivo y oportuno racionalizando su uso. Objetivo: Determinar los factores qué mejor explican la indicación de TNFi en la población en estudio. Material y métodos: La asociación entre el uso de medicamentos anti-TNFα y las variables categóricas demográficas, clínicas, de laboratorio, radiológicas y de tratamiento se exploró por prueba exacta de Fisher. La asociación con las variables cuantitativas fue evaluada con t de Student o U de Mann Withney, de acuerdo con su distribución. Aquellas variables con p < 0,25 fueron ingresadas a modelos univariante de regresión logística explicativa para construir los OR crudos; aquellas con p < 0,25 se incluyeron en el modelo multivariante para construir OR ajustados. Resultados y discusión: La población está constituida por 181 pacientes. Modelo univariante: la artritis reactiva, uretritis y compromiso periférico fueron factores protectores para el uso de TNFi. Espondiloartritis axial, lumbalgia inflamatoria, dolor glúteo alternante, rigidez matinal sacroilitis demostrada por cualquier método, tratamiento con inhibidores COX-2, tiempo de evolución de tres arios o más y los puntajes de BASDAI y BASFI se asociaron con el uso de TNFi. Modelo multivariante: artritis reactiva (OR 0,1, IC 95% 0,012-0,86, p = 0,036), lumbalgia inflamatoria (OR 13,63, IC 95% 1,36-136, p = 0,026), sacroilitis (OR 7,71, IC 95% 1,04-57, p = 0,045, uso de coxib (OR 10,1, IC 95% 2,71-37,62, p = 0,001) y el puntaje máximo de BASDAI (4-6: OR 6,1, IC 95% 1,3-28,7, p = 0,022, mayor de 6: OR 15,8, IC 95% 2,2-113, p = 0,006) se asociaron independientemente con el uso de TNFi. El uso de coxib se asoció con la indicación de usar TNFi tanto en los pacientes con espondiloartritis axial (OR 4,2, IC 95% 1,74-10,11, p = 0,001) como periférica (OR 4, IC 95% 1,85-8,62, p < 0,001). Conclusiones: El inicio de la enfermedad en la forma de artritis reactiva se comportó como un factor protector para la necesidad posterior de usar TNFi, mientras que presentar lumbalgia inflamatoria, sacroilitis demostrada por cualquier método, el tratamiento con coxib y el puntaje máximo de BASDAI mayor de 4 se asociaron con el uso de estos medicamentos.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors is increasing in patients with spondyloarthritis. Early identification of those that would require them, or the ability to predict their use, could lead to a more effective and timely treatment by rationalizing their use. Objective: To determine factors that better explain the indication of TNFi in the study population. Material and methods: The association between anti-TNFα use and categorical demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological and treatment variables was explored using Pearson's Chi2 or Fisher's exact test. The association with the quantitative variables was evaluated using Student's t test or Mann Whitney U test, depending on their distribution. Those variables with P < 0.25 were entered into univariate models of explanatory logistic regression to cons truct crude ORs, and those with P < 0.25 were included in the multivariate model to construct adjusted ORs. Results and discussion: The study population includes 181 patients. In the univariate model: reactive arthritis, urethritis, and peripheral involvement were protective factors for the use of TNFi. Axial spondyloarthritis, inflammatory lumbalgia, alternating gluteal pain, morning stiffness, sacroiliitis demonstrated by any method, treatment with COX-2 inhibitors, evolu tion time of three years or more, and BASDAI and BASFI scores were associated with the use of TNFi. Multivariate model: reactive arthritis (P = 0.036), inflammatory back pain (P = 0.026), sacroiliitis (P = 0.045), use of coxibs (P = 0.001) and the maximum score of BASDAI (P = 0.022, P = 0.006) were independently associated with the use of TNFi. The use of coxibs was associa ted with the indication of using TNFi in both patients with axial spondyloarthritis (P = 0.001) and peripheral (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The onset of the disease in the form of reactive arthritis behaved as a protective factor for the subsequent need to use TNFi, while presenting with inflammatory back pain, sacroiliitis, demonstrated by any method, treatment with coxibs, and the maximum score of BASDAI greater than 4 associated with the use of these medications.

Comparison of disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis under TNFi or NSAID treatment, is there any difference? An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there are any real-life differences between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with NSAID or TNF inhibitors (TNFi) regarding disease activity. METHODS: This is an observational transversal unicentric study with retrospective retrieval of data from clinical records of all AS patients attended in our hospital. We compared clinical activity measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores between patients treated with NSAID and those treated with TNFi, in terms of low disease activity defined as BASDAI<4, and inactivity when BASDAI≤2. As secondary variables, we also collected epidemiological, clinical and radiological data from all those patients. RESULTS: A total of 152 AS patients (81% male), with an average age of 49.45±12.38 years and a disease duration of 13.5±9.79 years were included in the study. Eighty-nine patients (58.6%) were treated with NSAID and 63 (41.4%) with TNFi. The proportion of patients with low disease activity and inactive disease was significantly higher in the TNFi treatment group compared to the NSAID group (81 vs. 47, P=.0001) and (44 vs. 24, P=.007), respectively. Patients treated with NSAIDs also showed significantly more global pain and night pain than those under TNFi therapy. The BASFI score and especially the type of treatment (NSAID or TNFI) were the only variables independently associated with low disease activity or inactive disease. CONCLUSION: In real world practice, AS patients under TNFi treatment show a better control of clinical symptoms than those under NSAIDs.

Hydration with Lactated Ringer's solution combined with rectal diclofenac in the prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. / Hidratación con Ringer Lactato combinado con diclofenaco rectal en la prevención de pancreatitis poscolangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica.

OBJECTIVE: Different measures are recommended to reduce pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a study in patients with ERCP treated with rectal diclofenac or lactated Ringer's solution, or both interventions, to assess whether there is a decrease in the number of cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A mixed cohort study involving 1,896 patients from 2009 to 2018. Up to June 2012 without treatment (Group I). Subsequently, 100mg of rectal diclofenac (Group II). Since 2016, lactated Ringer's solution 200ml/hour during the procedure and 4hours after it, in addition to 500ml over 30minutes when the pancreas was cannulated (Group III). Since 2017, lactated Ringer's solution plus Diclofenac (Group IV). There were 725 patients in group I, and 530, 227 and 414 patients in groups II, III and IV, respectively. Factors predisposing to post-ERCP pancreatitis and post-ERCP pancreatitis cases that were defined by consensus criteria have been collected. RESULTS: There were 65 cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis (3.4%); 2.9%, 3.4%, 3.1% and 4.3% in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively (P=.640). In group I, there was 4.2% of post-ERCP pancreatitis in naïve papillae and 4%, 4.9% and 6.3% in groups II, III and IV, respectively (P=.585). The severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis and adverse effects were similar in all groups. 38.4% were high-risk patients. There were also no differences in post-ERCP pancreatitis in this group (P=.501). CONCLUSION: In this work, no benefit was obtained with diclofenac plus hydration in reducing the number and severity of cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis nor with the other prophylactic measures.

Effect of pre-administered flurbiprofen axetil on the EC50 of propofol during anesthesia in unstimulated patients: a randomized clinical trial / Efeito da pré‐ administração de flurbiprofeno axetil na CE50 do propofol durante anestesia em pacientes não estimulados: estudo clínico randomizado

Abstract Background and objectives Preoperative use of flurbiprofen axetil (FA) is extensively adopted to modulate the effects of analgesia. However, the relationship between FA and sedation agents remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of FA on the median Effective Concentration (EC50) of propofol. Methods Ninety-six patients (ASA I or II, aged 18-65 years) were randomly assigned into one of four groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Group A (control group) received 10 mL of Intralipid, and groups B, C and D received 0.5 mg.kg−1, 0.75 mg.kg−1 and 1 mg.kg−1 of FA, respectively, 10 minutes before induction. The depth of anesthesia was measured by the Bispectral Index (BIS). The "up-and-down" method was used to calculate the EC50 of propofol. During the equilibration period, if BIS ≤ 50 (or BIS > 50), the next patient would receive a 0.5 µg.mL−1-lower (or -higher) propofol Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) concentration. The hemodynamic data were recorded at baseline, 10 minutes after FA administration, after induction, after intubation and 15 minutes after intubation. Results The EC50 of propofol was lower in Group C (2.32 µg.mL−1, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.85-2.75) and D (2.39 µg.mL−1, 95% CI 1.91-2.67) than in Group A (2.96 µg.mL−1, 95% CI 2.55-3.33) (p = 0.023, p = 0.048, respectively). There were no significant differences in the EC50 between Group B (2.53 µg.mL−1, 95% CI 2.33-2.71) and Group A (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in Heart Rate (HR) among groups A, B and C. The HR was significantly lower in Group D than in Group A after intubation (66 ± 6 vs. 80 ± 10 bpm, p < 0.01) and 15 minutes after intubation (61 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 8 bpm, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences among the four groups in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at any time point. The MAP of the four groups was significantly lower after induction, after intubation, and 15 minutes after intubation than at baseline (p < 0.05). Conclusion High-dose FA (0.75 mg.kg−1 or 1 mg.kg−1) reduces the EC50 of propofol, and 1 mg.kg−1 FA reduces the HR for adequate anesthesia in unstimulated patients. Although this result should be investigated in cases of surgical stimulation, we suggest that FA pre-administration may reduce the propofol requirement when the depth of anesthesia is measured by BIS.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos A administração pré‐operatória de Flurbiprofeno Axetil (FA) é amplamente usada para a modulação da analgesia. No entanto, a relação entre FA e fármacos sedativos permanece obscura. Neste estudo, nosso objetivo foi investigar os efeitos de diferentes doses de FA na Concentração Efetiva mediana (CE50) do propofol. Métodos Noventa e seis pacientes (ASA I ou II, com idades de 18-65 anos) foram alocados aleatoriamente em quatro grupos na proporção de 1:1:1:1. Dez minutos antes da indução, o Grupo A (grupo controle) recebeu 10 mL de Intralipid, enquanto os grupos B, C e D receberam FA na dose de 0,5 mg.kg‐1; 0,75 mg.kg‐1 e 1 mg.kg‐1, respectivamente. A profundidade da anestesia foi medida pelo Índice Bispectral (BIS). O método up‐and‐down foi usado para calcular a CE50 do propofol. Durante o período de equilíbrio, se o valor do BIS fosse ≤ 50 ou BIS > 50, o próximo paciente tinha a infusão de propofol ajustada para uma concentração alvo‐controlada 0,5 µg.mL‐1 inferior ou superior, respectivamente. Os dados hemodinâmicos foram registrados no início do estudo, 10 minutos após a administração de FA, após a indução, após a intubação e 15 minutos após a intubação. Resultados A CE50 do propofol foi menor no Grupo C (2,32 µg.mL‐1, Intervalo de Confiança de 95% [95% IC] 1,85-2,75) e D (2,39 µg.mL‐1, 95% IC 1,91-2,67) do que no Grupo A (2,96 µg.mL‐1; 95% IC 2,55-3,33) (p = 0,023, p = 0,048, respectivamente). Não houve diferenças significantes na CE50 entre o Grupo B (2,53 µg.mL‐1, 95% IC 2,33-2,71) e o Grupo A (p > 0,05). Não houve diferenças significantes na Frequência Cardíaca (FC) entre os grupos A, B e C. A FC foi significantemente menor no grupo D do que no grupo A após a intubação (66 ± 6 vs. 80 ± 10 bpm, p < 0,01) e 15 minutos após a intubação (61 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 8 bpm, p < 0,01). Não houve diferenças significantes entre os quatro grupos na Pressão Arterial Média (PAM) em qualquer momento. A PAM dos quatro grupos foi significantemente menor após a indução, após a intubação e 15 minutos após a intubação do que na linha de base (p < 0,05). Conclusão FA em altas doses (0,75 mg.kg‐1 ou 1 mg.kg‐1) reduz a CE50 do propofol, e 1 mg.kg‐1 de FA reduz a FC durante níveis adequados de anestesia em pacientes não estimulados. Embora esse resultado deva ser investigado na presença de estimulação cirúrgica, sugerimos que a pré‐administração de FA pode reduzir a necessidade de propofol durante anestesia cuja profundidade seja monitorada pelo BIS.

[Effect of pre-administered flurbiprofen axetil on the EC50 of propofol during anesthesia in unstimulated patients: a randomized clinical trial]. / Efeito da pré­administração de flurbiprofeno axetil na CE50 do propofol durante anestesia em pacientes não estimulados: estudo clínico randomizado.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative use of flurbiprofen axetil (FA) is extensively adopted to modulate the effects of analgesia. However, the relationship between FA and sedation agents remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of FA on the median Effective Concentration (EC50) of propofol. METHODS: Ninety-six patients (ASA I or II, aged 18-65 years) were randomly assigned into one of four groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Group A (control group) received 10 mL of Intralipid, and groups B, C and D received 0.5 mg.kg-1, 0.75 mg.kg-1 and 1 mg.kg-1 of FA, respectively, 10 minutes before induction. The depth of anesthesia was measured by the Bispectral Index (BIS). The "up-and-down" method was used to calculate the EC50 of propofol. During the equilibration period, if BIS ≤ 50 (or BIS > 50), the next patient would receive a 0.5 µg.mL-1-lower (or-higher) propofol Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) concentration. The hemodynamic data were recorded at baseline, 10 minutes after FA administration, after induction, after intubation, and 15 minutes after intubation. RESULTS: The EC50 of propofol was lower in Group C (2.32 µg.mL-1, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.85-2.75) and D (2.39 µg.mL-1, 95% CI 1.91-2.67) than in Group A (2.96 µg.mL-1, 95% CI 2.55-3.33) (p = 0.023, p = 0.048, respectively). There were no significant differences in the EC50 between Group B (2.53 µg.mL-1, 95% CI 2.33-2.71) and Group A (p ˃ 0.05). There were no significant differences in Heart Rate (HR) among groups A, B and C. The HR was significantly lower in Group D than in Group A after intubation (66 ± 6 vs. 80 ± 10 bpm, p < 0.01) and 15 minutes after intubation (61 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 8 bpm, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences among the four groups in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at any time point. The MAP of the four groups was significantly lower after induction, after intubation, and 15 minutes after intubation than at baseline (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: High-dose FA (0.75 mg.kg-1 or 1 mg.kg-1) reduces the EC50 of propofol, and 1 mg.kg-1 FA reduces the HR for adequate anesthesia in unstimulated patients. Although this result should be investigated in cases of surgical stimulation, we suggest that FA pre-administration may reduce the propofol requirement when the depth of anesthesia is measured by BIS.

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the Elderly. Agreement With Safe Prescription Recommendations According to Cardiovascular and Gastrointestinal Risks.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs are the cornerstone in the treatment of acute and chronic pain due to inflammation in musculoskeletal conditions. Even though adverse side-effects are associated, their use is common in the elderly patients. Our aim is to determine the prescription trend of NSAIDs, the evaluation for gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks, and the level of agreement with prescription guidelines. METHODS: We conducted an observation and descriptive study in a general hospital geriatrics consultation. RESULTS: From the 231 patients only 59 patients had a NSAIDs prescription. The most frequently prescribed was Acetaminophen, in 29(49.1%) patients, Celecoxib was prescribed in 11(18.6%) patients, Piroxicam in 5(8.4%) patients, Acetaminophen plus Celecoxib plus Omeprazole in 4 (6.7%), Acetaminophen plus Piroxicam in 2 (0.3%) patients, and Acetaminophen plus Diclofenac plus Celecoxib in 1 patient (1.6%). In the Framingham risk classification there were 160/231 (69.3%) patients in Very High Risk and 71/231 (30.7%) patients in High Risk. There were no patients in Low Risk. GI Risk: 79 patients (34.1%) had a peptic ulcer disease history. There were 55/231 (23.8%) in the High GI Risk classification, 102/231 (44.1%) in Intermediate GI Risk and 74/231 (32%) in the Low Risk. The level of agreement between the prescribed versus recommended NSAIDs according the CV and GI risks was measured with a contingence table and the kappa statistic of 0.37 p=0.001. CONCLUSION: There is a low level of agreement between prescribed and recommended NSAID in elderly population.

Clinical management of dogs with presumptive diagnosis of thoracolumbar intervertebral disc disease: 164 cases (2006-2017) / Tratamento clínico de cães com diagnóstico presuntivo de doença do disco intervertebral toracolombar: 164 casos (2006-2017)

This study aimed to identify dogs with presumptive diagnosis of cervical intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) submitted to clinical management and to evaluate the outcomes. Data were obtained from the medical records of patients with neurological dysfunction assisted at a University Veterinary Hospital from 2006 to 2017. In addition to the patients' records, dog owners responded to a questionnaire on the success of therapy. Four hundred and thirteen neurological records were evaluated, and 164 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The most common breed was Dachshund, followed by mongrels. Classification of neurological dysfunction in the study sample was as follows: 15.9% with grade I, 25.6% with grade II, 26.8% with grade III, 8.5% with grade IV, and 23.2% with grade V. Outcome was satisfactory in 71.6% of the dogs and unsatisfactory in 28.4% of them. Recurrence was observed in 27.7% of those with satisfactory outcomes. The clinical treatment of dogs with thoracolumbar IVDD is satisfactory, particularly for animals with milder disease grades (I, II, and III). There is possibility of recurrence with conservative therapy and clinical signs may be more severe.(AU)

O objetivo desse estudo foi identificar cães com diagnóstico presuntivo de DDIV toracolombar submetidos ao tratamento clínico, a fim de avaliar a resposta à terapia instituída. Foram revisados os registros neurológicos de cães atendidos pelo Serviço de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia Veterinária no período de 2006 a 2017 de um Hospital Veterinário Universitário. Foi realizada coleta de dados a partir dos registros e por meio de um questionário respondido pelos tutores. Foram avaliadas 413 fichas neurológicas de cães e obtidas informações para inclusão no estudo em 164 delas. As raças mais frequentes foram dachshunds, seguido de cães sem raça definida. Quanto ao grau de disfunção neurológica foi definido como grau I para 15,9% dos cães, grau II para 25,6%, grau III para 26,8%, grau IV para 8,5% e grau V para 23,2%. A recuperação foi satisfatória em 71,6% dos cães e insatisfatória em 28,4%. Dos que se recuperaram satisfatoriamente, 27,7% tiveram recidivas. Com base nos resultados obtidos pode-se concluir que o tratamento clínico em repouso absoluto e administração de anti-inflamatórios e analgésicos opióides para cães com DDIV toracolombar é efetivo, principalmente para cães em graus mais leves da doença (grau I, II e III). Há possibilidade de recidiva com esse tipo de terapia cujos sinais clínicos poderão ser mais graves.(AU)

Améliorer le rappel des individus âgés de 60 ans et plus à l'aide de l'entretien cognitif : une revue et méta-analyse.

Les aînés sont souvent perçus comme des témoins peu fiables, une perception qui est partiellement appuyée par des travaux qui démontrent que les témoignages des aînés tendent à être moins détaillés que ceux produits par des témoins plus jeunes. L'entretien cognitif est une technique d'interrogatoire qui repose sur des stratégies de rappel issues des sciences cognitives. Plusieurs travaux récents démontrent l'efficacité de l'entretien cognitif auprès d'échantillons de jeunes adultes. Toutefois, la recherche portant sur l'utilisation de l'entretien cognitif auprès de témoins âgés est récente et en développement. Le présent article effectue une synthèse des travaux portant sur l'efficacité de l'entretien cognitif auprès d'aînés ainsi qu'une méta-analyse des données publiées à ce jour. La méta-analyse comprend sept études traitant des performances de participants aînés et comparant l'efficacité de l'entretien cognitif à celle obtenue en employant d'autres techniques de rappel. Les résultats démontrent une augmentation du nombre de détails corrects rappelés quand l'entretien cognitif est utilisé. Cependant, les données actuelles ne permettent pas de conclusion valide pour le nombre de détails incorrects ou sur l'exactitude du rappel. La discussion présente les forces et faiblesses des travaux publiés à ce jour de manière à favoriser le développement futur de ce domaine de recherche.

Systemic absortion and adverse effects of topical ocular use of ketorolac tromethamine and sodium diclofenac in New Zealand rabbits for 90 days / Absorção sistêmica e efeitos adversos do uso tópico ocular por 90 dias de cetorolaco de trometamina e diclofenacode sódio em coelhos da raça Nova Zelândia

The effect of the systemic absorption of 0.1% diclofenac sodium (DS) eyedrop was compared to that of 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine (KT) in female New Zealand white rabbits treated on both eyes three times a day for 90 days. The rabbits were divided in three groups of six animals (n= 18): KT group, DS group, and control (Co) group, in which saline (0.9% NaCl) solution was instilled. Water and food consumption were measured daily, clinical examination was performed weekly, and blood samples were collected every 30 days for laboratory examination. The plasma was analyzed for the presence of KT and DS by solid-phase extraction (SPE) associated with mass spectrometry (MS). Systemic absorption of these drugs was confirmed by SPE-MS, allowing their separation and identification in the plasma. At the end of the treatment, the animals were euthanized and necropsied, and no macroscopic or microscopic changes were found. This observation confirmed the laboratory results, which were within normal reference standards for the species. According to the results obtained, it can be concluded that treatment with eyedrops containing KT and DS for 90 days in healthy rabbits does not cause adverse systemic effects.(AU)

Comparou-se o efeito da absorção sistêmica do colírio de diclofenaco de sódio 0,1% (DS) em relação ao de cetorolaco de trometamina 0,5% (CT) em coelhas da raça Nova Zelândia, tratadas nos dois olhos, três vezes ao dia, por 90 dias. As coelhas foram separadas em três grupos de seis animais (n=18): grupo CT, grupo DS e grupo controle (Co), no qual foi instilada solução fisiológica (NaCl 0,9%). Os consumos de água e ração foram mensurados diariamente, os exames clínicos foram realizados semanalmente e o sangue foi coletado a cada 30 dias para realização de exames laboratoriais. O plasma foi analisado para detectar a presença de CT e DS por extração em fase sólida (SPE) associada à espectrometria de massas (MS). A absorção sistêmica desses fármacos foi confirmada por SPE-MS, permitindo sua separação e identificação no plasma. Ao final do tratamento, os animais foram eutanasiados e necropsiados, e não foram encontradas alterações macroscópicas ou microscópicas. Essa observação confirmou os resultados laboratoriais, que estavam dentro dos padrões de referência para a espécie. De acordo com os resultados obtidos, pode-se concluir que o tratamento com colírio contendo KT e DS, por 90 dias, em coelhos saudáveis, não causa efeitos adversos sistêmicos.(AU)

Eficacia y seguridad de los AINE tópicos / Efficacy and safety of topical NSAIDs / Eficácia e segurança dos AINEs tópicos

Resumen: Introducción: los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) constituyen uno de los grupos farmacológicos más prescritos a nivel mundial. En los últimos años ha aumentado el uso de AINE de administración tópica, con una prevalencia de prescripción creciente. Objetivo: revisar la eficacia y seguridad de AINE tópicos comparados con los administrados por vía oral en el tratamiento del dolor. Material y método: se realizó una revisión narrativa utilizando la base de datos Pubmed. La búsqueda arrojó un total de 141 artículos de los cuales 4 cumplían con los criterios de inclusión propuestos. Discusión: la evidencia que respalda el uso de AINE tópicos en cuanto a eficacia está comparada con placebo, incluyen escaso número de pacientes y utilizan variables primarias blandas, lo que constituye una limitante metodológica para determinar su beneficio, por lo que no se pudo analizar la evidencia disponible según el objetivo planteado. En cuanto a la seguridad, la incidencia de efectos adversos más frecuentemente reportados son los gastrointestinales, siendo menos frecuente con la administración tópica, sin embargo, ésta vía agrega efectos adversos cutáneos en el sitio de administración. Conclusión: la facilidad de acceso a estos medicamentos, la percepción de menor riesgo por tratarse de una vía no sistémica y la escasa evidencia disponible favorecen el uso irracional de los AINE tópicos.

Abstract: Introduction: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are one of the most prescribed pharmacological groups worldwide. In recent years the use of topical NSAID has increased, with a growing prevalence of prescription. Objective: The aim of the present work was to review the efficacy and safety of topical NSAID compared to oral administration for the treatment of pain. Material and method: A narrative review was made using the Pubmed database. The evidence that supports the use of topical NSAID in terms of efficacy is compared with placebo, include a small number of patients and use soft primary outcomes, which constitutes a methodological limitation to asses their benefit, not allowing to analyze the available evidence according to the aim set. Regarding safety, the incidence of adverse effects most frequently reported are gastrointestinal, which are less frequent with topical administration, however, this route adds adverse cutaneous effects at the administration site. Conclusion: The ease of access to these medications, the low risk perception due to it is a non-systemic route and the limited available evidence stimulate the irrational use of topical NSAID.

Resumo: Introdução: Os medicamentos anti-inflamatórios não esteroides (AINE) são um dos grupos farmacológicos mais prescritos em todo o mundo. Nos últimos anos, o uso de AINE tópicos aumentou, com uma crescente prevalência de prescrição. Objetivos: O objetivo do presente trabalho foi revisar a eficácia e segurança dos AINE tópicos em comparação com a via oral no tratamento da dor. Materiais e métodos: Uma revisão narrativa foi feita usando o banco de dados Pubmed. A evidência que suporta o uso de AINE tópicos em termos de eficácia é comparada com placebo, inclui um pequeno número de pacientes e usa variáveis ​​primárias moles, o que constitui uma limitação metodológica para determinar seu benefício, portanto, a evidência disponível não pôde ser analisada de acordo com o objetivo. Em relação à segurança, a incidência de efeitos adversos mais frequentemente relatados é gastrointestinal, sendo menos freqüente com a administração tópica, porém, esta via acrescenta efeitos cutâneos adversos no local de administração. Conclusões: A facilidade de acesso a esses medicamentos, a percepção de menor risco, por ser uma via não sistêmica e a limitada evidência disponível, favorecem o uso irracional de AINE tópicos.

Inyección Intraarticular Única de Ácido Hialurónico en la Artrosis de Rodilla: Estudio Multicéntrico Prospectivo Abierto (ART-ONE 75) mediante Comparación Post-Hoc con Placebo.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La viscosuplementación del líquido sinovial mediante la inyección intraarticular (IA) de ácido hialurónico (AH) es un tratamiento sintomático ampliamente utilizado en la artrosis de rodilla (AR). Además de los productos diseñados para realizar inyecciones múltiples (normalmente de 3 a 5 inyecciones, en intervalos de 1 semana), se presta especial atención a los productos de una única inyección, ya que ofrecen ventajas específicas, como son un menor número de visitas al médico y de intervenciones invasivas con sus riesgos asociados. Sin embargo, aún existen dudas sobre la eficacia de estas inyecciones únicas, en comparación con los regímenes de inyecciones múltiples. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio multicéntrico, abierto, prospectivo, post-mercado (ART-ONE 75) con el producto de inyección única ARTHRUM 2,5% (3 ml, 75 mg AH), en 214 pacientes que sufrían de AR. Los pacientes fueron seguidos en D30, D60, D120 y D180 (días). El perfil promedio de los pacientes en el momento de la inclusión fue de 62,9 años, 56% mujeres, grados I-III de Kellgren-Lawrence (46% KL III), IMC de 27,2 kg/m2 y 4 años desde el diagnóstico de AR. Se realizó una comparación post-hoc con una inyección IA única de placebo (326 pacientes, agrupados de 3 estudios ECA), que proporcionaron un perfil de paciente similar. RESULTADOS: el criterio principal fue la variación desde el inicio de la puntuación de la escala WOMAC A (dolor, escala 0-100) en D60, que se redujo en 28,9 (17,4) para la población por intención de tratar (ITT, por sus siglas en inglés) (199 pacientes), 28,0 (17,8) para la población por protocolo (PP) en la inclusión (175 pacientes), y en 27,7 (16,8) para la población PP al finalizar (143 pacientes).Los criterios secundarios y accesorios incluyeron WOMAC A en otras ocasiones, WOMAC B (rigidez), WOMAC C (función), calidad de vida y discapacidad en cada momento de seguimiento. Todos los índices mejoraron significativamente y continuaron mejorando al final del estudio. La evaluación terapéutica en D180 mostró que más del 75% de los pacientes se encontraban satisfechos con la reducción del dolor, la mejora de la movilidad, y la reducción de analgésicos y AINE. El porcentaje de pacientes definidos como respondedores de OMERACT-OARSI fue superior al 86%, a partir de D60 y en adelante. La tolerancia general fue buena, sin que ocurriera ningún evento adverso grave. El resultado de la comparación post-hoc para la escala WOMAC A mostró un tamaño del efecto [IC 95%] desde TE = 0,33 [0,15; 0,51] en D60 a TE = 0,65 [0,45; 0,85] en D180 (p <0,001), frente a la inyección de placebo (solución salina), lo cual es un resultado clínicamente relevante a favor de ARTHRUM 2,5%. CONCLUSIÓN: El presente estudio confirma la eficacia clínica de una única inyección IA de 3 ml de solución de AH conteniendo 75 mg de AH nativo de alto PM (> 2 MDa).

Aspectos de seguridad en el tratamiento del dolor con analgésicos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos / Security issues in pain management with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Resumen Los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) son el grupo farmacológico que más se consume globalmente con o sin prescripción médica, sobre todo para el tratamiento sintomático de diversos padecimientos que cursan con dolor agudo o crónico. La estructura química de los AINE es heterogénea, por lo que comparten efecto antipirético, antiinflamatorio y analgésico a través de su capacidad para inhibir las prostaglandinas proinflamatorias. El conocimiento de que existen múltiples variaciones en cuanto a los perfiles de riesgo que presentan los AINE obliga a individualizar su uso en función de la patología de base, las características particulares del paciente y la experiencia del médico. Los AINE se deben utilizar en ciclos cortos y con las dosis más bajas posibles, tratando de mantenerlos en un rango de eficacia clínica y vigilando en específico las complicaciones gastrointestinales, cardiovasculares, renales, hepáticas y hematológicas derivadas de los mismos. El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar los aspectos de seguridad en el tratamiento analgésico crónico con AINE.

Abstract Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most consumed drugs worldwide, with or without medical prescription, mostly for the symptomatic treatment of a widely range of diseases characterized by acute or chronic pain. NSAIDs have a heterogenous chemical structure that gives them antipyretic, anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties through their ability to inhibit proinflammatory prostaglandins. The variability in risk profiles among NSAIDs forces the medical community to individualize their use based on the personal characteristics of the patients as well as the expertise of the physician. NSAIDs should be used for short cycles of treatment with the lowest doses possible, using them in a range of clinical efficacy, with specific monitoring of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, renal hepatic and hematologic complications. The objective of this work is to review the safety aspects of the treatment with NSAIDs in chronic analgesic management.

Enoch Senior's College for Korean Immigrant Seniors: Quality of Life Effects.

ABSTRACTA community-based program is increasingly recognized as promoting health and active social participation in one's life, yet information is lacking about the use and impact of such programs among immigrant visible minority seniors. This mixed-method research evaluated the impact of a cultural community program for Korean immigrant seniors by examining participants' health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) benefits and overall well-being. In this study, 79 participants completed the SF-36v2 questionnaire twice to assess the impact of Canada Enoch Senior's College (CESC) program on their HR-QOL and well-being. Statistically significant improvement in physical and mental health domains was observed: bodily pain and role limitations due to emotional problems. Qualitative data from participants' interviews supported the survey findings with positive contributions in health and social arenas of seniors' lives. These results suggest that the CESC program contributes to quality of life and well-being of Korean senior participants and supports similar community-based cultural programs.

Manejo farmacológico del dolor en la odontología actual / Pharmacological management of pain in today´s dentistry

Una de las principales preocupaciones de los pacientes que van a ser sometidos a un procedimiento odontológico es el dolor que dicho procedimiento pueda ocasionar. Por lotanto, lograr un control eficaz y seguro de ese dolor es una parte esencial de la práctica odontológica diaria. Los fármacos de primera elección para el tratamiento del dolor y el edemason, sin lugar a dudas, los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos(AINEs). Principios activos como el ibuprofeno (y sus congéneres) o sus derivados permiten controlar simultáneamente el dolor y el edema posquirúrgicos de una forma eficaz y segura. En muchas ocasiones, el AINE prescrito para mantener al paciente asintomático o con síntomas tolerables es suficiente. Sin embargo, cuando esto no ocurre, debemos recurrir a otrosfármacos, o realizar asociaciones con fármacos que complementen el efecto analgésico y trabajen logrando un sinergismo de potenciación que incremente el efecto buscado y disminuya los efectos adversos de cada una de las sustancias por separado, utilizando menores dosis. Un ejemplo comprobado de esas asociaciones es la de ibuprofeno con paracetamol. En el presente artículo se sugieren diversas estrategias pre- y posoperatorias para el manejo del dolor de origen inflamatorio, y un protocolo para su tratamiento.