Variation in Functional Pelvic Tilt in Female Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With Acetabular Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: As the pelvis is a dynamic structure, the quantification of pelvic tilt (PT) should be done in different hip positions prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA). We sought to investigate functional PT in young female patients undergoing THA and explore the correlation of PT with the extent of acetabular dysplasia. Additionally, we aimed to define the PS-SI (pubic symphysis-sacroiliac joint) index as a PT quantifier on AP pelvis X-ray. METHODS: Pre-THA female patients under the age of 50 years (n = 678) were investigated. Functional PT in 3 positions (supine, standing, and sitting) were measured. Hip parameters including lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle, head extrusion index (HEI), and femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index were correlated to PT values. The PS-SI/SI-SH (sacroiliac joint-sacral height) ratio was also correlated to PT. RESULTS: From the 678 patients, 80% were classified as having acetabular dysplasia. Among these patients, 50.6% were bilaterally dysplastic. The mean functional PT of the entire patient group was 7.4°, 4.1°, and -1.3° in the supine, standing and seated positions. The mean functional PT of the dysplastic group was 7.4°, 4.0°, and -1.2° in the supine, standing and seated positions. The PS-SI/SI-SH ratio was found to be correlated to PT. CONCLUSION: Most of the pre-THA patients had acetabular dysplasia and exhibited anterior PT in the supine and standing positions, most pronounced in the standing position. PT values were comparable between the dysplastic and non-dysplastic group without change with worsening dysplasia. PS-SI/SI-SH ratio can be used to easily characterize PT.

Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model.

AIMS: Traditionally, total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating has been performed on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Recently, additional AP hip radiographs have been recommended for accurate measurement of the femoral offset (FO). To verify this claim, this study aimed to establish quantitative data of the measurement error of the FO in relation to leg position and X-ray source position using a newly developed geometric model and clinical data. METHODS: We analyzed the FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs in a prospective consecutive series of 55 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA for hip osteoarthritis. To determine sample size, a power analysis was performed. Patients' position and X-ray beam setting followed a standardized protocol to achieve reproducible projections. All images were calibrated with the KingMark calibration system. In addition, a geometric model was created to evaluate both the effects of leg position (rotation and abduction/adduction) and the effects of X-ray source position on FO measurement. RESULTS: The mean FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs were 38.0 mm (SD 6.4) and 36.6 mm (SD 6.3) (p < 0.001), respectively. Radiological view had a smaller effect on FO measurement than inaccurate leg positioning. The model showed a non-linear relationship between projected FO and femoral neck orientation; at 30° external neck rotation (with reference to the detector plane), a true FO of 40 mm was underestimated by up to 20% (7.8 mm). With a neutral to mild external neck rotation (≤ 15°), the underestimation was less than 7% (2.7 mm). The effect of abduction and adduction was negligible. CONCLUSION: For routine THA templating, an AP pelvis radiograph remains the gold standard. Only patients with femoral neck malrotation > 15° on the AP pelvis view, e.g. due to external rotation contracture, should receive further imaging. Options include an additional AP hip view with elevation of the entire affected hip to align the femoral neck more parallel to the detector, or a CT scan in more severe cases.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):795-803.

Impact of gonad shielding for AP pelvis on dose and image quality on different female sizes: A phantom study.

INTRODUCTION: In clinical practice AP pelvis standard protocols are suitable for average size patients. However, as the average body size has increased over the past decades, radiographers have had to improve their practice in order to ensure that adequate image quality with minimal radiation dose to the patient is achieved. Gonad shielding has been found to be an effective way to reduce the radiation dose to the ovaries. However, the effect of increased body size, or fat thickness, in combination with gonad shielding is unclear. The goal of the study was to investigate the impact of gonad shielding in a phantom of adult female stature with increasing fat thicknesses on SNR (as a measure for image quality) and dose for AP pelvis examination. METHODS: An adult Alderson female pelvis phantom was imaged with a variety of fat thickness categories as a representation of increasing BMI. 72 images were acquired using both AEC and manual exposure with and without gonad shielding. The radiation dose to the ovaries was measured using a MOSFET system. The relationship between fat thickness, SNR and dose when the AP pelvis was performed with and without shielding was investigated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Ovary dose and SNR remained constant despite the use of gonad shielding while introducing fat layers. CONCLUSION: The ovary dose did not increase with an increase of fat thickness and the image quality was not altered. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Based on this phantom study it can be suggested that obese patients can expect the same image quality as average patients while respecting ALARA principle when using adequate protocols.

Can the anode heel effect be used to optimise radiation dose and image quality for AP pelvis radiography?

INTRODUCTION: A study was conducted to determine whether the anode heel effect can be used to influence optimisation of radiation dose and image quality (IQ) for AP pelvis radiography. METHODS: ATOM dosimetry phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom were positioned for AP pelvis. Using a CR system, images were acquired and doses were measured with phantom feet toward anode and then feet toward cathode. Exposure factors (kVp, mAs and SID) were systematically generated using a factorial design. Images were scored visually for quality using relative visual grading together with a 3 point Likert scale. Signal to noise ratio was also calculated as a physical measure of image quality. Dosimetry data were collected for the ovaries and testes. RESULTS: The optimum technique for male, which resulted in lower dose and suitable image quality, was with feet positioned toward the anode (0.80 ± 0.03 mGy; SNR of 38 ± 2.9; visual IQ score 3.13 ± 0.35). The optimum technique for female was with feet toward anode (0.23 ± 0.02 mGy; SNR of 34.7 ± 2.6; visual IQ score 3.15 ± 0.26). kVp had the biggest effect on both visual and physical image quality metrics (p < 0.001) for both tube orientations, whereas SID had the lowest effect on both visual and physical image quality metrics compared with mAs and kVp (p < 0.001). The effect of SID on the SNR was not significant (p > 0.05) with feet toward anode. CONCLUSION: Positioning the patient with feet toward the anode, as opposed to the cathode, has no adverse effect on visual image quality assessment but it does have an effect on physical image quality. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study would add a new clinical concept in positioning of AP pelvis radiography especially for male positioning.

"Simple mechanical devices did not improve pelvis positioning in AP pelvis radiographs for reliable assessment of the acetabular orientation".

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop two simple positioning devices for anteroposterior pelvis radiographs and to evaluate their effect on accuracy of the radiographs for assessment of the acetabular orientation compared with non-instrumented positioning. METHODS: The superior anterior iliac spines and the pubic symphysis were used as anatomical landmarks to obtain a horizontal orientation of the pelvis according to the anterior pelvic plane. Anteroposterior pelvis radiographs were taken of 11 human cadaveric pelvic bones with each of the positioning devices and without any device. Defined measurements were carried out to objectify the tilt and rotation of the pelvis and to assess the cross-over sign as well as the presence of the ischial spine sign. Computed tomography scans were performed as a standard of reference. Bland-Altman-Plots were used to compare the continuous measurement values and Cohen's Kappa was applied for the categorical data. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS: The mean values of the measurements showed a high variability. A low correlation of the measurement values was found between the radiographs of the different positioning methods and the computed tomography scans. The intra- and inter-observer reliability was good (Cohen's Kappa 0.78 and 0.69; intraclass correlation coefficient 0.99 and 0.98). CONCLUSION: The use of positioning devices did not lead to more accurate anteroposterior pelvis radiographs compared to non-instrumented positioning. Simple positioning devices do not provide standardized anteroposterior pelvis radiographs for reliable assessment of the acetabular orientation.

Is the evaluation of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) in the AP pelvis possible? Analysis of conventional X-rays and 3D-CT reconstructions.

INTRODUCTION: A hypertrophic AIIS has been identified as a cause for extraarticular hip impingement and is classified according to Hetsroni using 3D-CT reconstructions. The role of the conventional AP pelvis X-ray, which is the first standard imaging step for the evaluation of hip pain, has not been investigated yet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AP pelvis X-rays and 3D-CT reconstructions of patients were evaluated regarding their morphology of the AIIS. The conventional X-rays were categorized into three groups according to the projection of the AIIS: above (A) or below (B) the acetabular sourcil or even exceeding the anterior acetabular rim (C). They were compared to the morphologic types in the 3D-CT reconstruction (Hetsroni type I-III). RESULTS: Ninety patients with an equal distribution of type A, B or C projection in the AP pelvis were evaluated and compared to the morphology in the 3D-CT reconstruction. The projection of the AIIS below the acetabular sourcil (B + C) showed only moderate sensitivity (0.76) and specificity (0.64) for a hypertrophic AIIS (Hetsroni type II + III), but if the AIIS exceeds the anterior rim, all cases showed a hypertrophic AIIS in the 3D-CT reconstructions (Hetsroni type II + III). CONCLUSIONS: Distinct differentiation of the AIIS morphology in the AP pelvis is not possible, but the projection of the AIIS below the anterior acetabular rim represented a hypertrophic AIIS in all cases and should, therefore, be critically investigated for a relevant AIIS impingement.