Evaluation of antenatal care quality for preterm birth prevention using an auditable scoring system: A retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal study in Sydney, Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Preterm birth continues to be one of the most significant contributors to perinatal death. This study aims to evaluate the quality of antenatal care provided to women delivering preterm. METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal review of all women who had antenatal care within a single Australian tertiary hospital and delivered spontaneously between 24 and 37 weeks of gestation, using an auditable scoring system assessing potential interventions for prevention of preterm birth. The review was limited to singleton pregnancies without fetal abnormalities delivering between January 2013 and April 2015. The audit tool was developed by reference to established 'best practice' guidance for prediction and prevention of preterm birth based on Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines and published literature. Different pathways were assessed for women deemed either low- or high-risk at the outset of antenatal care. RESULTS: A series of 161 pregnancies that delivered preterm (between 24 and 37 weeks' gestation) were reviewed. The quality of antenatal care was scored 'good' in 42.9% and 50% of high-risk and low-risk women, respectively. Care was scored 'adequate', with room for improvement in 51.4% and 45.2% of the two corresponding groups. The main deficiencies in care were recorded evidence of assessment of cervical length (absent in 35% of cases) and failure to screen for bacterial vaginosis in high-risk women. CONCLUSIONS: Auditing antenatal care for prevention of preterm birth allows identification of suboptimal practice allowing service improvement and potential intervention for preterm birth prevention.

Certification system for multidisciplinary thoracic tumour boards.

In Spain, lung cancer (LC) is the fourth most common cancer. Managing LC involves different professionals, and cooperative and coordinated work is crucial. Therefore, important decisions are better made by Multidisciplinary Thoracic Tumour Boards (MTTBs). On the other hand, certification systems have proven to improve the structure of care, ultimately having a positive impact on patient survival. Herein, a multidisciplinary working group of 11 experts (a Radiologist, a Thoracic Surgeon, a Pulmonologist, a Radiotherapy Oncologist, four Medical Oncologists, a Hospital Managing Director, a Cytologist, and a Molecular Biologist specialist) proposed a standard to certify and evaluate MTTBs. The following components were suggested for the standard: minimum requirements for the MTTB, a mixed model developed in two stages (preparation and audit), a structure comprising three groups of indicators (Strategic and Management, Support, and Operational), three certification levels, and an audit process. In our opinion, certifying MTTBs is critical to improve the standard of care for LC patients.

Improving eye care in an intensive care unit.

In Intensive Care Units (ICUs), patients are at risk of developing ocular complications, especially exposure keratopathy. Plan, Do, Study, Act for PDSA cycle. Despite national guidelines, implementation remains challenging. Using the PDSA cycle, we devised an eye care protocol integrated into the electronic patient record system, complemented by a poster summary of guidelines. An initial audit showed 2% adherence to eye exposure guidelines; post-intervention, adherence rose to 76%. A 9-month analysis revealed 16% of patients experienced eye exposure in ICU. This initiative emphasises the new protocol's efficacy and the role of education in its adoption, advocating a more standardised approach to eye care in ICUs.

Assessment of the quality of oral squamous cell carcinoma clinical records in oral surgery with Surgical Tool for Auditing Records (STAR) scoring.

BACKGROUND: The Surgical Tool for Auditing Records scoring system [STAR] focuses on surgical record auditing with promising outcomes. It offers a structured approach to evaluating the quality of surgical notes. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the STAR in evaluating oral surgical records and identifying areas for improvement in documentation practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data was obtained from the Dental Information Archival Software (DIAS) of our institution. The sample size was determined using G*Power 3.1.9.4 software. Fifty consecutive oral surgery clinical records of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients were evaluated using STAR. Each record was reviewed for adherence to documentation standards including Initial Assessment (10 points), Follow-up Entries (8 points), Consent Documentation (7 points), Anesthesia Report (7 points), Surgical Log (9 points), and Discharge Synopsis (9 points). compiling a total STAR score (50 points). The data was tabulated in Google Sheets. The descriptive statistics with inter-observer agreement and the mean score were recorded. RESULTS: We observed that each of the 50 records received a score of 49/50 points on the STAR. Deductions were necessary in the Operative record section due to the lack of information regarding the sutures used. CONCLUSION: To summarize, this study emphasizes the effectiveness of the STAR scoring system in evaluating the quality of oral surgical records. Identifying deficiencies, particularly in documenting operative details, can improve the completeness and accuracy of patient records. It can ultimately enhance patient care and facilitate better communication among healthcare professionals.

Blockchain-enabled EHR access auditing: Enhancing healthcare data security.

In the realm of modern healthcare, Electronic Health Records EHR serve as invaluable assets, yet they also pose significant security challenges. The absence of EHR access auditing mechanisms, which includes the EHR audit trails, results in accountability gaps and magnifies security vulnerabilities. This situation effectively paves the way for unauthorized data alterations to occur without detection or consequences. Inadequate EHR compliance auditing procedures, particularly in verifying and validating access control policies, expose healthcare organizations to risks such as data breaches, and unauthorized data usage. These vulnerabilities result from unchecked unauthorized access activities. Additionally, the absence of EHR audit logs complicates investigations, weakens proactive security measures, and raises concerns to put healthcare institutions at risk. This study addresses the pressing need for robust EHR auditing systems designed to scrutinize access to EHR data, encompassing who accesses it, when, and for what purpose. Our research delves into the complex field of EHR auditing, which includes establishing an immutable audit trail to enhance data security through blockchain technology. We also integrate Purpose-Based Access Control (PBAC) alongside smart contracts to strengthen compliance auditing by validating access legitimacy and reducing unauthorized entries. Our contributions encompass the creation of audit trail of EHR access, compliance auditing via PBAC policy verification, the generation of audit logs, and the derivation of data-driven insights, fortifying EHR access security.

A quality improvement project to enhance the knowledge, skills, and attitude of healthcare workers regarding the use of defibrillators.

Introduction: Defibrillation is a critical intervention in managing cardiac emergencies, yet healthcare workers (HCWs) preparation for utilizing defibrillators remains inadequate, particularly in low and middle-income countries. This quality improvement project aimed to assess and enhance HCWs' knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward defibrillator use in the emergency department (ED) through a 1-h defibrillator workshop. Methodology: An observational clinical audit was conducted within the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Pre- and post-workshop data were collected from the participants using structured questionnaires for demographics, knowledge assessment (20 multiple-choice questions), skills assessment (10-step checklist), and attitude evaluation (Likert-scale statements). The workshop included theoretical instruction and hands-on practice, with a post-workshop assessment conducted one week later. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics and paired t-tests, while ethical considerations ensured confidentiality and consent. Results: The study included 38 participants, demonstrating significant gaps in defibrillator knowledge, skills, and attitudes pre-workshop. Post-workshop assessments revealed a marked improvement in knowledge scores (P<0.05), attitudes (P<0.05), and practical skills (P<0.05). Participants' confidence and preparation for managing cardiac emergencies notably increased, indicating the workshop's efficacy in addressing the identified deficiencies. Conclusion: The 1-h defibrillator workshop effectively enhanced HCWs' competence and readiness to utilize ED defibrillators. The observed improvements underscore the importance of targeted educational interventions in bridging knowledge gaps and fostering proactive attitudes toward emergency management. Regular training sessions should be conducted to sustain these enhancements and improve patient outcomes in the ED.

Does the Referral System for Emergency Obstetric Care in India Require a Major Overhaul?

How to cite this article: Taggarsi DA. Does the Referral System for Emergency Obstetric Care in India Require a Major Overhaul? Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):719-721.

Referral Audit of Critically Ill Obstetric Patients: A Five-year Review from a Tertiary Care Health Facility in India.

Background: In resource-limited facilities, the greatest number of unfavorable maternal-fetal outcomes at referral hospitals is chronicled from emergency obstetric referrals of critically ill patients from lower health facilities. An efficient obstetric referral system is thus necessitated for improving maternal health. Referral practices have not been optimized effectively till date, owing to paucity of a detailed profile of referred women and indigenous barriers encountered during implementation process. Materials and methods: This five-year retrospective audit was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi from September 2018 to 2023, in which records of all critically ill obstetric women referred were reviewed. The primary outcomes included were proportion and pattern of patients being referred, while secondary outcomes included demographic variables, referring hospital, reason and number of steps in referral, duration of hospital stay and fetomaternal outcome. The data were recorded on a predesigned case proforma and analyzed using the SPSSv23 version of software, after application of appropriate statistical tests. Results: The referral rate to obstetric intensive care unit (ICU) ranged from 39 to 47% in last 5 years; hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (31%) being the foremost cause of the referrals. Around 2/3rd women were transferred without escort (70%) or prior communication (90.6%) and referral slips were incomplete in half the admissions. Conclusion: Ensuring emergency obstetric care (EmOC) at various levels by up-gradation of health infrastructure would go a long way in improving fetomaternal health outcomes. There is need of standardized referral slips tailor-made to each state and contextualized protocols for early recognition of complications and effective communication between referral centers. How to cite this article: Marwah S, Suri J, Shikha T, Sharma P, Bharti R, Mann M, et al. Referral Audit of Critically Ill Obstetric Patients: A Five-year Review from a Tertiary Care Health Facility in India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):734-740.

Compliance of Surgical Care in Patients with Carcinoma Endometrium in a Tertiary Care Centre in South India, to European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO) Quality Indicators.

To analyse the compliance of surgical care provided to patients diagnosed with carcinoma endometrium, to the European Society of Gynaeacological Oncology (ESGO) quality indicators. This is a retrospective audit done in the Department of Gynaecologic Oncology. Electronic medical records of patients who underwent surgical management of carcinoma endometrium from January 2020 to December 2021 were assessed. A total of 163 patients had undergone primary surgery, and 2 patients had surgery for recurrence. The audit showed that the target for categories of general indicators and pre-operative work-up was met. There was lack in compliance to the intraoperative management, with only 34% among presumed early-stage disease undergoing successful MIS, 31% undergoing sentinel lymph node procedure and 53% among them being done using indocyanine green with 18% bilateral mapping rate. None of the patients had complete molecular classification. Compliance to adjuvant treatment provided was adequate. Minimal required elements in surgical reports were in 81% and pathological reports in 91% of patients falling short of the set target. The audit helped us identify the need to increase MIS and use and adapt sentinel lymph node procedure with ICG dye more aggressively. There also is a need for improvement in documentation of pertinent information on surgical and pathology reporting. Molecular classification should be routinely incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm to aid in adjuvant therapy.

The impact of clinical audit on antibiotic prescribing in dental practice at Taibah University Dental Hospital.

There is evidence that antibiotics are sometimes prescribed inappropriately by dental practitioners, which can lead to undesirable outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of a clinical audit on antibiotic prescribing practices at Taibah University Dental Hospital in Madina, Saudi Arabia. The study retrospectively analyzed antibiotic-prescribing data for pediatric patients by dental interns and faculty members over a period of 8-months. The data collected revealed that inappropriate antibiotic prescription was prevalent initially, with a total of 119 antibiotic-prescriptions issued. After implementing an action plan that included the use of guidelines and educational sessions, a second cycle of the audit was conducted over a 4-month period. During the second cycle, the number of antibiotic prescriptions significantly decreased to 58, indicating a reduction of 48%. Across both cycles, amoxicillin emerged as the most frequently prescribed antibiotic, closely followed by Augmentin. Notably, pulpal diseases and peri-radical complications were consistently ranked as the conditions with the highest number of antibiotic prescriptions in both study periods. The results suggest that the clinical audit, along with the implementation of guidelines and educational sessions, had a positive impact on antibiotic prescribing practices at Taibah University Dental Hospital, leading to a significant reduction in inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions.

Opportunities to Advance Equity Through Implementation Strategy Design.

Background: Implementation strategies are potential tools for advancing equity goals in healthcare. Implementation scientists have increased attention to the integration of equity considerations into implementation research, but limited concrete guidance is available for developing implementation strategies to improve equity. Main: In parallel to an active hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in two large health systems, our research team explored potential inequities in implementation across four non-study clinics, developed equity focused audit and feedback procedures, examined the feasibility of our approach, and identified design insights that could be tested in future work to inform equitable program scale-up. Based on our experiences deploying these strategies in pilot format, our research team identified key complexities meriting further examination in future work. These considerations are vital given the dearth of guidance on delivering feedback to clinicians in efforts to improve equity. Key takeaways include the importance of understanding local data culture, engaging constituents in co-design for the full feedback cycle, leveraging feedback for shared discourse, and centering multi-level strategies as part of robust implementation approaches. Conclusion: Prioritizing health equity in implementation science requires that research teams probe, interrogate, and innovate - and in doing so, grapple with central conceptual and pragmatic considerations that arise in the design of implementation strategies. Our work emphasizes the value of bidirectional and continuous learning.

Value of an orthopaedic admission proforma.

BACKGROUND: Admission notes are an important aspect of clinical practice and a vital means of communication among healthcare professionals. Incomplete or poor clinical documentation on admission can lead to delayed surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive admission notes to our department was compared against the Royal College of Surgeons standards (GSP 2014). A new admission proforma was designed, and after the introductory period, two further retrospective cycles were performed. RESULTS: In total, 60 admission notes were analysed. Following the introduction of the proforma, there was an overall improvement in the documentation of the quality and quantity of notes studied. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that a well-structured admission protocol can improve the overall quality of admission notes.

Intrahospital Handovers before and after the Implementation of ISBAR Communication: A Quality Improvement Study on ICU Nurses' Handovers to General Medical Ward Nurses.

BACKGROUND: Research finds a lack of structure as well as varying and incomplete content in intrahospital handovers. This study aimed to improve intrahospital handovers by implementing structured ISBAR communication (identification, situation, background, assessment and recommendation). METHODS: This quality improvement study was conducted observing 25 handovers given by nurses from the intensive care unit to nurses from general medical wards at baseline and after the implementation of the ISBAR communication tool. The 26-item ISBAR scoring tool was used to audit the handovers. In addition, the structure of the ISBAR communication and time spent on the handovers were observed. RESULTS: There were no significant improvements from baseline to post-intervention regarding adherence to the ISBAR communication scoring tool. The structure of the handovers improved from baseline to post-intervention (p = 0.047). The time spent on handovers declined from baseline to post-intervention, although not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The items in the ISBAR communication scoring tool can act as a guide for details that need to be reported during intrahospital handovers to strengthen patient safety. Future research calls for studies measuring satisfaction among nurses regarding using different handover tools and studies using multifaceted training interventions.

Clinical Audit in the Elderly by Assessing Hydration and Renal Functions Before and After Contrast CT Scans at District Headquarters Hospital, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.

Introduction Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a serious risk involved in computed tomography (CT) scans, particularly for older people. The main idea of this clinical audit was to assess current practices regarding renal function tests (RFTs) and hydration status before and after contrast CT scans in older patients at District Headquarters Hospital (DHQ), Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan, and to implement recommendations for improvement. CIN is a form of acute kidney injury that occurs after the administration of contrast dye used in imaging procedures and is characterized by a sudden deterioration in renal functions. Methods This clinical audit checked adherence to renal protection protocols in elderly patients undergoing contrast CT scans. Conducted over three cycles from July 5 to August 15, 2022, this clinical audit included 30 patients aged 75 and above. Each cycle had 10 patients, divided equally between males and females, and further categorized into age groups of 75-85 years and 86-95 years. Data collection involved reviewing patient files, medication charts, and CT scan reports. Compliance with RFT documentation and hydration before and after the CT scan was assessed against the standards set by Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2023 (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA), and graphs were created using Microsoft Word 2023 (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA). Results The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) for males was 81.8 ± 5.01 in the first cycle, 83.4 ± 6.46 in the second cycle, and 82.4 ± 4.72 in the third cycle. For females, the mean age ± SD was 83.2 ± 5.80 in the first cycle, 85.2 ± 6.41 in the second cycle, and 83.0 ± 6.12 in the third cycle. The first audit cycle revealed that, while all patients (100%) had their RFTs documented before the CT scan, only 20% were adequately hydrated pre-scan, and none (0%) had RFTs performed post scan. Post-scan hydration was also low at 20%. These findings highlighted gaps in adherence to renal protection protocols. The second cycle showed improvements, with pre-scan hydration adherence increasing to 80%, post-scan RFTs to 60%, and post-scan hydration to 70%. By the third cycle, full compliance (100%) was achieved across all standards, including pre- and post-scan renal functions test and hydration. Conclusion The clinical audit at District Headquarters Hospital, Dera Ismail Khan, addressed gaps in renal protection protocols for elderly patients undergoing contrast CT scans. The audit improved adherence over three cycles through targeted interventions, including staff training, implementation of checklists, patient education, modifying the reporting format, and providing instructions in the local language. It also highlighted the importance of continuous education and regular monitoring. The clinical audit would be expanded to another hospital within the medical teaching institute, Dera Ismail Khan. This measure will maintain and enhance patient care, prevent CIN, and improve the renal health of elderly patients.

An international film dosimetry intercomparison to establish a multi-center audit framework.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, a Technical Meeting was hosted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) where it was recommended that a standardized method for assessing the accuracy of film dose calculations should be established. PURPOSE: To design an audit that evaluates the accuracy of film dosimetry processes. To propose a framework for identifying out-of-tolerance results and to perform an international pilot study to test the audit design. METHODS: Six members of an international Dosimetry Audit Network (DAN) developed an audit for radiochromic film dosimetry. A single host center provided the materials to each participating DAN member to conduct the audits. Materials included: (1) a set of two irradiated audit films (10 Sq: 10 cm × 10 cm, 15 Sq: 15 cm × 15 cm), (2) a reference calibration film set, and (3) a blank sheet of film. The participants were blinded to the dose and tasked with producing dose maps using their standard film dosimetry process. Average Region-Of-Interest (ROI: 2 cm × 2 cm) dose was measured from the dose maps and compared to the known dose. In the audit, all participants used their local scanning and software protocols. Film calibration was performed in two distinct ways: (1) using a calibration film set which was provided by the host center and (2) using a calibration film set which was locally irradiated. Several variations of the audit were also performed to examine how scanning and software processing can affect film dosimetry results. In the first variation of the audit (VariantA), a set of film scans was processed using five different software solutions. In the second variation of the audit (VariantB), all films were scanned on the same scanner and processed using two in-house software solutions. RESULTS: Taking one film scan from each participant, the standard deviations (1σ) (SD) in the dose returned from the host calibration and returned from the local calibration were ±7.2% and ±6.5% respectively, with variations from -12.4% to 12.9% of the known dose. The larger dose variations in the data set were attributed to the corrections applied for variations in scanner brightness during processing and incorrectly assigned calibration doses. When the raw image data set was processed by an expert user of each software solution (VariantA) the SDs were ±2.7% and ±3.7% for in-house and vendor-based software, respectively. When the films were scanned on a single scanner and processed with the two in-house software solutions (VariantB) the results had a SD of ±2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: An audit has been designed and tested for radiotherapy film dosimetry at an international level. A framework for diagnosing issues within a film dosimetry process has been proposed that could be used to audit centers that use film as a dosimeter. Incorporating quality assurance throughout the film process is important in obtaining accurate and consistent film dosimetry. A better understanding of vendor-based software systems is necessary for users to process accurate and consistent film dosimetry.

A Clinical Audit of Pregnancy Testing in Females Presenting With Abdominal Pain to the General Surgery Department of a District General Hospital.

Introduction Guidelines state that all female patients of childbearing age presenting with acute abdominal pain to a surgical department must have a pregnancy test with either urinary or serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (𝜷-HCG) testing. This allows complete evaluation of the patient and consideration of a wider range of differential diagnoses, including those that must not be missed, such as a possible ectopic pregnancy. Additionally, management options for conditions unrelated to pregnancy may differ in pregnant women. This audit assessed adherence to guidelines for pregnancy testing in females presenting with abdominal pain to the general surgery department in a district general hospital and the impact of initiatives to improve compliance. Methods A retrospective audit to identify pregnancy test completion of all female patients aged between 11 and 55 years presenting to the general surgery department at a district general hospital with acute abdominal pain in August 2022 was conducted. A medical education session, posters, and discussion amongst multidisciplinary team members in a nursing huddle followed to raise awareness. A subsequent prospective audit was conducted in November 2022. Results In the initial audit conducted in August 2022, 55 female patients aged between 11 and 55 years presented to the surgical department with abdominal pain. Of these patients, pregnancy testing was only completed for 41.8% (n = 23). Following interventions, a second audit conducted in November 2022 found 30 female patients presenting with abdominal pain. In this cohort, pregnancy testing was completed for 80% of patients (n = 24). Conclusion This study highlights the need for regular clinical audits and multidisciplinary discussion in improving and maintaining high standards of patient care and ensuring pregnancy testing of all females of reproductive age presenting with abdominal pain to the general surgery department. Further consideration may be given to the incorporation of recording of pregnancy test status on electronic healthcare systems as part of admission and mandatory checklists.

Prescription writing quality of psychotropic agents in MBBS interns in a private medical college hospital in Mangaluru.

Background: Rational prescription writing is an important skill to master during internship. This Quality Improvement (QI) project aimed to understand the state of prescription writing among interns posted in the Department of Psychiatry, analyze the causes responsible for errors in prescription writing and bring about a change in the current practice. Methods: The MBBS interns are posted in the Department of Psychiatry for 15 days. During day 1 to day 5 of their posting, a pre intervention phase was conducted wherein prescriptions written by interns in the Department of Psychiatry were collected. The prescriptions were scored based on 14 criteria which were selected based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and Medical Council of India (MCI) ideal prescription format. During PDSA (Plan Do Study Act) Cycle 1, an educational handout was distributed to the interns containing the MCI ideal prescription format and WHO guidelines regarding prescription writing. The brochure was also verbally explained to the interns. From day 7 to day 15 of their posting, prescriptions written by the interns were collected. The prescriptions were scored using the same criteria. Results: During the pre intervention phase the mean total score of prescriptions was 9.54 ± 1.003. There was a significant improvement in the mean total score to 10.26 ± 0.746. There was a 7.54% improvement. There was also a significant improvement in several individual criteria. Conclusions: The first PDSA cycle was successful in improving the quality of prescription writing among interns posted in the Department of Psychiatry. There is a need to implement more PDSA cycles to improve the quality still further.

Evaluation of hospital quality of care outcomes in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia: a retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate hospital mortality rates, readmission rates and length of hospital stay (LOS) among adult medical patients admitted to a teaching hospital in Ethiopia. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study using routinely collected electronic data. SETTING: Data were collected from Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College between January 2021 and July 2023. PARTICIPANTS: The analysis included 3499 (4111 admissions) adult medical patients with complete data. OUTCOME MEASURES: We used mortality rates, readmission rates and LOS to measure the quality of the outcomes for the top 15 admission diagnoses. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the statistically significant predictors of mortality with p values<0.05 and a 95% CI. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the failure rate (mortality) of the admitted patients. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 50 years and men accounted for 1827 (52.3%) of all admitted cases. Non-communicable diseases accounted for 2537 (72.5%) admissions. In descending order, stroke, 644 (18.29%); heart failure, 640 (18.41%); and severe pneumonia, 422 (12.06%) were the three most common causes of admission. The readmission rate was 25.67% (1056/411), and 61.9% of them were readmitted within 30 days of index discharge. The overall median LOS was 8 days. The median LOSs in the index admission (11 vs 8 days, p value=0.001) of readmitted patients was significantly higher than not readmitted. The in-hospital mortality rate was 438 (12.5%), with the highest number of deaths occurred between days 30 and 50 of admission. The mortality rate is significantly higher among patients with communicable diseases (adjusted HR, 1.64, 95% CI: 1.34, 2.10) and elderly patients (≥65 years) (adjusted HR, 1.79, 95% CI: 1.44, 2.22). Septicemia, chronic liver diseases with complications and HIV with complications were the three common causes of death with a proportional mortality rate of 55.2%, 27.93% and 22.46%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality, median LOSs and readmission rate were comparable to other national and international studies. Multicentre compressive research using these three quality patient outcomes is required to establish national standards and evaluate institutional performance.

Bridging the gaps: A prospective analysis of root causes for rejection and incompleteness in blood requisition forms.

INTRODUCTION: Blood request form (BRF) stands as a pivotal document in ensuring safe and effective blood transfusions within healthcare settings. Incomplete or erroneous data on BRF can heighten risk of adverse reactions and compromise patient safety. Aim of study was to assess level of completion of BRFs by clinicians and to evaluate root cause analysis (RCA) of incompleteness of BRFs and factors leading to their rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was carried out from February 2024 to April 2024 on BRFs received in the blood centre. They were audited and RCA for factors leading to their incompleteness and rejection were analysed. RESULTS: Total number of BRFs received in blood centre was 14,468. 13,358 (92.3%) BRFs were accepted and 1,110 (7.7%) BRFs were rejected. 12,804 (95.85%) of accepted BRFs were incomplete. Weight was the most common missing parameter (89% {n = 11403}) while name of the requesting clinician was least common (2.5% {n-318}). 3.52% n = 510) BRFs were rejected due to mismatch in name and patient registration number on BRF and samples. 0.14% n = 21) BRFs were rejected due to hemolysed samples. RCA for incompleteness of BRFs showed that main reason was manpower (61-83%) while environment was least common (17-67%). RCA for rejection of BRFs showed that environment was most common cause (13.3-80.15%) while manpower was least common (9-19.85%). CONCLUSION: Regular audits and personnel training, and quality assurance measures can help identify and address deficiencies in BRF completion to enhance patient safety and reduce incidence of transfusion-related errors and complications.