Therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reactions of mirabegron versus solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome.

Introduction: Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a chronic disease characterized by urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence, frequency, and nocturia and antimuscarinic drugs such as solifenacin have been the mainstay of treatment. Mirabegron a beta 3 adrenoreceptor agonist has recently gained importance in the management of OAB. The rationale of the study is that mirabegron improves the storage function without affecting voiding which increases the therapeutic effectiveness. The objective was to determine the therapeutic effectiveness of mirabegron versus solifenacin. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 298 patients with OAB syndrome attending the urology outpatient department of government medical college after obtaining institutional review board clearance. Patients of both genders, belonging to the 18-65 years of age group, attending the urology outpatient department were selected for the study. Patients were evaluated using the OAB-validated 8-question awareness tool (OAB-V8 score) before and after receiving drugs by direct questionnaire method after receiving informed consent. Patients were prescribed either solifenacin 5 mg or mirabegron 25 mg once daily by the urologist. Follow-up was done after 4 and 12 weeks. Adverse drug reactions of the drugs were assessed using the Central Drug Standard Control Organization suspected adverse reaction (ADR) form, and ADRs were notified to the nearest ADR monitoring center. Results: The mirabegron group showed maximum improvement in the mean OAB-V8 score values from baseline at 4 weeks (12.82 ± 5.86, P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (5.74 ± 3.31, P < 0.001) when compared to solifenacin. OAB-V8 scores of the solifenacin group also showed significant improvement from the baseline at 4 weeks (15.30 ± 5.54, P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (8.05 ± 4.59, P < 0.001). Heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressures did not show significant changes during the follow-up in both the study groups. Thirteen patients developed ADRs such as dry mouth (four patients) and constipation (nine patients) in the solifenacin group. No ADRs were noted in the mirabegron group. Conclusion: Mirabegron showed maximum improvement in the OAB-V8 scores in patients with OAB syndrome, although the solifenacin group also showed improvement. Adverse effects were less in the mirabegron group when compared to the solifenacin group.

Combined noradrenergic plus antimuscarinic agents for obstructive sleep apnea - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Currently, no pharmacotherapy is routinely used for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Recently, combined noradrenergic plus antimuscarinic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of OSA in several trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines investigated the efficacy and safety of this combination drug regimen for the treatment of OSA. Seven databases were systematically screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying combined noradrenergic plus antimuscarinic agents for OSA to April 2022. Nine RCTs were identified for systematic review and five for meta-analysis. There were significant differences between OSA patients taking noradrenergic plus antimuscarinic agents and placebo with respect to sleep apnea-hypopnea index [mean difference (MD) -11.27 events/h, 95%CI (-21.69, -0.84) events/h; P = 0.03]; nadir oxygen saturation [MD 5.06%, 95% CI (2.57, 7.55)%; P < 0.0001], and arousal index [MD -8.17 events/h, 95% CI (-15.01, -1.33) events/h; P = 0.02] but not sleep efficiency. Our systematic review revealed that drug therapy modestly improved loop gain and upper airway collapsibility but decreased arousal threshold. A combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents administered orally before bedtime on one night significantly reduced OSA severity and improved OSA upper airway function. The long-term efficacy and safety of drug combinations in OSA patients now require further study.

Safety evaluation of revefenacin at the approved dose in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Revefenacin is the first once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for nebulization use in maintenance therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and tolerability profile of revefenacin at the approved dose (175 µg), compared with placebo and a lower dose (88 µg), for the treatment of COPD. METHODS: Available randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both published and unpublished, were identified via databases. Risk differences (RDs) and risk ratios (RRs), with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as effect sizes. RESULTS: One unpublished RCT and four articles containing 5 RCTs were included. Combined results showed that there were no significant differences between COPD patients receiving 175 µg revefenacin and those receiving a placebo, concerning the risk of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), any all-grade AE, or any serious AE. 175 µg revefenacin also did not significantly increase the risk of antimuscarinic-related AEs, cardiovascular AEs, or 12 commonly reported AEs. Plus, a lower dose of 88 µg was shown to share a comparable safety profile with the 175 µg revefenacin. A non-significant trend towards a decrease in risks of AEs for 175 µg revefenacin was observed. The most frequently reported AE for each group was COPD worsening/exacerbation. CONCLUSION: Revefenacin at the approved dose is generally well-tolerated and safe with minimal AEs, which supports its use as a once-daily nebulized LAMA for the treatment of moderate to severe stable COPD. Additional studies are needed to complete the safety and tolerability profile.

Is imidafenacin an alternative to current antimuscarinic drugs for patients with overactive bladder syndrome?

PURPOSE: Previous studies have included a limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and compared limited parameters after treatment with imidafenacin and other anticholinergic drugs (ADs) for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and controversy about the superiority of these ADs still remains. We aim to update the evidence and provide better clinical guidance. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrial.gov and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from January 2007 to April 2019. Meta-analysis of all published RCTs comparing imidafenacin with other ADs in patients with OAB was performed. The primary outcomes were the changes in OAB symptoms and OAB symptom score (OABSS). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and the dropout rate related to AEs. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies including 7 RCTs involving 1430 patients with mean follow-up of 23.43 weeks were included. All ADs improved OAB symptoms. Regarding efficacy, these drugs had similar efficacy in voids, urgency episodes, urgency incontinence episodes, incontinence episodes and OABSS. However, imidafenacin performed better in the reduction of nocturia episodes (MD = -0.24, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.04, P = 0.02). Moreover, imidafenacin was associated with a statistically lower dry mouth rate (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.00, P = 0.04), lower constipation rate (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.93, P = 0.01) and lower AE-related withdrawal rate (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.89, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in terms of other complications. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, imidafenacin was comparable to other ADs in the treatment of OAB. Moreover, imidafenacin presented a lower dry mouth rate, lower constipation rate and higher adherence and persistence.

Long-term Persistence with Mirabegron versus Solifenacin in Women with Overactive Bladder: Prospective, Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare persistence with medication and the reasons for discontinuation of mirabegron or solifenacin therapy up to12 months in women with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Female OAB patients who presented to women's urology clinics were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, two-arm study. Patients were randomized to receive mirabegron at 25-50 mg (n = 76) or solifenacin at 2.5-5 mg (n = 72). The persistence rate and the reasons for discontinuation were investigated up to 12 months. RESULTS: The 12-month persistence rate was 12.2% in the mirabegron group versus 20.1% in the solifenacin group and there were no significant differences of the persistence rates during the study (n.s). Patients discontinued treatment because of lack of efficacy (21.6%), spontaneous improvement (18.2%), and side-effects (17.6%), while 19.6% were lost to follow up. Discontinuation due to side-effects was significantly more frequent in the solifenacin group than the mirabegron group (27.3 vs. 7.9%, P < 0.05). In contrast, discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was significantly more frequent in the mirabegron group than the solifenacin group (36.8 vs. 5.6%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated low persistence rates over 12 months for both mirabegron and solifenacin, although the reasons for discontinuation were somewhat different.

Spotlight on glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate inhalation aerosol in the management of COPD: design, development, and place in therapy.

Long-acting bronchodilators are the mainstay of the treatment of COPD. With the advent of several combination inhalers with long-acting antimuscarinic agents (LAMAs) and long-acting beta agonists (LABAs), the choice of therapy in the treatment of COPD has been ever expanding. With the focus of COPD management shifting from FEV1-based treatment escalation to symptoms and risk-based treatment, we are seeing a paradigm shift in COPD treatment with early introduction of LAMA-LABA combination as a single inhaler. Glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination formulated in a familiar metered-dose inhaler format using proprietary co-suspension technology is a new option on the market. We purport to discuss the evidence behind the approval of the drug combination and its place in therapy.

Optimum Dose of Once-Daily Oxybutynin Patch in Japanese Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial Versus Placebo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and optimum dose of once-daily oxybutynin patch for overactive bladder. METHODS: A randomized double-blind trial was conducted in patients with overactive bladder symptoms for ≥24 weeks, who received an oxybutynin patch (73.5 or 105 mg) or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the daily frequency of micturition from baseline to the end of study. RESULTS: A total of 579 patients were randomized to the placebo group (n = 164), 73.5 mg oxybutynin patch group (n = 166), and 105 mg oxybutynin patch group (n = 165). The frequency of micturition (mean ± standard deviation) decreased by 1.19 ± 1.80 in the placebo group, 1.87 ± 1.93 in the 73.5 mg group, and 1.80 ± 1.76 in the 105 mg group. Compared with the placebo group, micturition decreased significantly in the 73.5 mg and 105 mg groups (t-test: P = 0.0025 and 0.0039, respectively), while the decrease was similar in both oxybutynin groups. The oxybutynin groups showed significant improvement of urgency, urge incontinence, incontinence, nocturia, mean voided volume, and five or six domains of the King's Health Questionnaire. Dry mouth was noted in 12.1% of the 73.5 mg group and 13.3% of the 105 mg group. Constipation was comparable between the oxybutynin groups and the placebo group. Application site reactions were less frequent in the 73.5 mg group than the 105 mg group. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of oxybutynin patch was confirmed, and the optimum dose for Japanese patients with overactive bladder was 73.5 mg.

Once-daily oxybutynin patch improves nocturia and sleep quality in Japanese patients with overactive bladder: Post-hoc analysis of a phase III randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of a once-daily oxybutynin patch for nocturia, and its influence on sleep quality in patients with overactive bladder. METHODS: We carried out post-hoc analysis of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, comparative study in which an oxybutynin patch was administered once daily for 12 weeks to Japanese patients with overactive bladder. Patients with a baseline mean of one or more episodes of nocturia per night (data from voiding diaries) were analyzed. The mean number of micturitions, mean voided volume per micturition, mean first voided volume at night, mean sleep duration, and hours of undisturbed sleep were compared between the once-daily oxybutynin patch group and the placebo group. All parameters were expressed as the least squares mean values. RESULTS: The analysis included 576 patients. The number of nocturia episodes decreased by 0.66 in the oxybutynin patch group versus 0.51 in the placebo group (P = 0.0249). Also, the voided volume per nocturnal micturition and the first voided volume at night showed a significant increase in the oxybutynin patch group compared with the placebo group (P = 0.0073 and P = 0.0005, respectively). The hours of undisturbed sleep showed significant prolongation by 76.14 min in the oxybutynin patch group versus 56.07 min in the placebo group (P = 0.0257). CONCLUSIONS: Oxybutynin patch treatment reduces the number of nocturia episodes and prolongs the hours of undisturbed sleep, thus improving sleep quality and sleep-related quality of life in patients with overactive bladder.

Factors influencing patient satisfaction with antimuscarinic treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results of a real-life clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate patient satisfaction with antimuscarinic treatment of overactive bladder syndrome, and to identify factors having a significant influence on satisfaction. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was carried out to assess treatment satisfaction among male and female patients with overactive bladder (age ≥20 years) in the Hokuriku district of Japan. The overactive bladder symptom scores, treatment efficacies, adverse events (dry mouth and constipation), and patient satisfaction scores were investigated and compared among patients using different antimuscarinic therapeutics. RESULTS: In total, 977 survey respondents (52.6% men; mean age 73.6 years) received antimuscarinic treatment. The mean overactive bladder symptom score of these patients was 6.17; in addition, 32.3% patients were satisfied with their treatment, but 33.1% were dissatisfied. Factors having a significant influence on treatment satisfaction were sex (men were less satisfied), efficacy, adverse events and the overactive bladder symptom score. Constipation negatively influenced patient satisfaction to a greater extent than did dry mouth. Patient satisfaction varied according to the drug used. Constipation was less severe with the immediate-release-type agents (imidafenacin and oxybutynin) than with the extended-release-type (propiverine, solifenacin or tolterodine). CONCLUSIONS: Just one-third of Japanese Hokuriku patients with overactive bladder seem to be satisfied with their antimuscarinic treatment. Patient satisfaction is impaired by poor efficacy and the presence of adverse events; furthermore, constipation should be recognized as an adverse event that negatively influences patient satisfaction to a greater extent than dry mouth. Patient satisfaction differs according to the antimuscarinic agent used, with higher patient satisfaction being associated with less severe constipation.

Overactive bladder syndrome: Current pathophysiological concepts and therapeutic approaches.

OBJECTIVES: The overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is a highly prevalent and bothersome symptom complex. We review contemporary reports to provide an update of the key aspects of its pathogenesis and the therapeutic approaches. METHODS: The PUBMED database was searched for relevant publications in the period from 1 January 1985 to 1 May 2013, using the keywords 'overactive bladder', 'anti-muscarinics', 'ß-3 agonists', 'intravesical botulinum toxin', 'tibial nerve stimulation and 'sacral neuromodulation'. RESULTS: In all, 33 articles were selected for this review. OAB is very common, affecting 10-20% of the population. It is often bothersome and frequently affects the quality of life. The current definition of OAB remains a source of controversy. Anti-muscarinic agents remain the mainstay of pharmacotherapy. The new ß-3 agonists have some efficacy whilst avoiding anti-cholinergic effects, and so might benefit patients who are unable to tolerate anti-muscarinic agents. Intravesical botulinum toxin is recommended for patients in whom oral pharmacotherapy fails, although the optimal parameters in terms of dosing, number of injections and injection site are yet to be fully established. Sacral neuromodulation is another option that has a good response in about half of patients. CONCLUSIONS: OAB remains an incompletely understood problem that presents a significant management challenge. A range of therapeutic options is now available for clinicians managing this problem.

Clinical Impact of Solifenacin on Generic and Symptom-Specific Quality of Life for Females with Overactive Bladder: Using the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and Rand Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness of antimuscarinic treatment on disease-specific and generic quality of life (QoL) in females with clinically diagnosed overactive bladder (OAB) by prospectively analyzing improvements in the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and the Rand Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). METHODS: We prospectively recruited newly diagnosed female patients with OAB. Pretreatment disease-specific symptoms were documented, and generic QoL questionnaires were administered. All subjects received solifenacin 5 mg/day for >8 weeks. Symptoms and general health-related QoL (HRQoL) were assessed using the OABSS and SF-36, respectively. Other objective variables, such as maximum urinary flow rate and postvoid residual urine volume, were also evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-eight subjects met all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria. After 8 weeks, the mean OABSS decreased by approximately 50% compared with baseline (from 9.1 ± 2.8 to 4.5 ± 3.6). All individual scores in OABSS improved after administration of solifenacin. Before treatment, the scores of the study subjects in all SF-36 domains were significantly worse than the age- and gender-adjusted Japanese national norms (P < 0.01), except the vitality (VT) scale. Intra-group comparisons between age groups showed worse mental health (MH) scores in all age groups. In the OAB group, three mean SF-36 scales (physical function [PF], VT, and MH) significantly improved after treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment of OAB with solifenacin is associated with significant improvement in generic HRQoL and disease-specific symptoms at 8 weeks after drug administration. Particularly for generic HRQoL as measured by the SF-36, solifenacin treatment effectively improves three SF-36 scores: PF, VT, and MH.

Fesoterodine for the treatment of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a highly prevalent condition, affecting males and females. The prevalence increases with age. Behavioral therapy and antimuscarinic therapy remain the first-line therapies for management of OAB. Despite improvements in symptoms, persistence with antimuscarinic therapy has remained low. Multiple factors including patient expectations, adverse effects and cost may affect persistence. Fesoterodine is one of the newest antimuscarinic agent approved for the management of OAB. It is unique in that it shares the same active metabolite as tolterodine, 5-hydoxymethyltolterodine (5-HMT); however, this conversion is established via ubiquitous esterases and not via the cytochrome P450 system, thus providing a faster and more efficient conversion to 5-HMT. Fesoterodine is available in 2 doses, 4 mg and 8 mg. Clinical trials have established a dose response relationship in efficacy parameters as well as improvements in quality of life. As with all antimuscarinics, dry mouth and constipation are the more common side effects. A combination of medical therapy and behavioral therapy improves the overall outcome in management of OAB. Dose flexibility may help improve efficacy outcomes and patient education on the management of common adverse effects may improve tolerability with these agents.

Will the evolution of overactive bladder delivery systems increase patient compliance?

The negative impact of overactive bladder (OAB) on daily quality of life drives the large market of pharmacotherapy targeted at symptoms of urinary frequency and urgency, with or without urinary urge incontinence. Currently, the primary pharmacologic treatment modality is aimed at modulation of the efferent muscarinic receptors (M2 and M3) predominant in detrusor smooth muscle and responsible for involuntary or unwanted bladder contractions. However, due to drug effects in the muscarinic receptors of the salivary glands and intestinal smooth muscle, as well as extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver and intestinal tract yielding parent drug metabolites, adverse side effects are common and can be quite bothersome. These issues, encountered with many of the oral antimuscarinic formulations, limit their tolerability and affect long-term patient compliance and satisfaction. Thus, the benefit of pharmacotherapy for OAB must be a balance between efficacy and tolerability, also known as therapeutic index. This article reviews the current pharmacologic delivery systems available for the treatment of OAB, patient compliance, and reasons for discontinuation of medication.