Recurrent aphthous stomatitis in a child successfully treated with apremilast.

A 13-year-old male presented with a 2-year history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. The patient had undergone several unsuccessful treatments, leading to the decision to initiate apremilast. He showed a good clinical response with reduction in outbreaks, and no adverse effects were observed. This is the first report, to our knowledge, of a pediatric patient treated with apremilast for this indication.

Case report: Managing pemphigus foliaceus using apremilast without systemic glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents.

Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is a superficial form of pemphigus. Treatment options for PF resemble pemphigus vulgaris, including glucocorticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and rituximab et al. These treatment approaches can effectively improve the condition but may also be accompanied by high risks of side effects. Therefore, it is crucial to find a safe and effective treatment options for patients with PF. It will not only benefit/be necessary for patients who refuse glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents treatments, but also for patients who cannot be treated with glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. Herein, we reported a case of PF that was treated with apremilast without systemic glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. A 54-year-old woman presented with itchy erythema and erosions on the trunk for more than 1 month. The patient applied mometasonefuroate cream without improvement for a duration of two weeks. The past history of diabetes mellitus and atrophic gastritis was reported. Physical examination revealed scattered erythematous macules and erosions on the trunk. No mucosal involvement was observed. The condition was assessed by the pemphigus disease area index and numerical rating scale, with baseline scores of 7 and 8, respectively. Histopathological examination showed acantholysis and intraepithelial blister. Direct immunofluorescence revealed the presence of IgG and Complement 3 deposition between the acanthocytes with the reticular distribution. Based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results, the levels of Dsg1 and Dsg3 antibodies were 28.18 and 0.26 kU/L respectively. The diagnosis of PF was made. This patient was successfully treated with apremilast without systemic glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. The patient has continued with apremilast 30mg once daily for maintenance and no adverse events related to apremilast such as gastrointestinal side effects were observed during the 9-month follow-up period. In conclusion, apremilast therapy without systemic glucocorticosteroids nor immunosuppressive agents might provide an effective alternative to management of mild PF without obvious side effect.

Clinical and molecular insights into cardiovascular disease in psoriatic patients and the potential protective role of apremilast.

Psoriatic disease, encompassing both psoriasis (Pso) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), is closely intertwined with a significantly elevated risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. This connection is further compounded by a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes, obesity, insulin resistance, arterial hypertension, and dysregulated lipid profiles. These comorbidities exceed the rates seen in the general population and compound the potential for increased mortality among those living with this condition. Recognizing the heightened cardiometabolic risk inherent in psoriatic disease necessitates a fundamental shift in the treatment paradigm. It is no longer sufficient to focus solely on mitigating inflammation. Instead, there is an urgent need to address and effectively manage the metabolic parameters that have a substantial impact on cardiovascular health. Within this context, apremilast emerges as a pivotal treatment option for psoriatic disease. What sets apremilast apart is its dual-action potential, addressing not only inflammation but also the critical metabolic parameters. This comprehensive treatment approach opens up new opportunities to improve the well-being of people living with psoriatic disease. This review delves into the multifaceted aspects involved in the development of cardiovascular disease and its intricate association with psoriatic disease. We then provide an in-depth exploration of the pleiotropic effects of apremilast, highlighting its potential to simultaneously mitigate metabolic complications and inflammation in individuals affected by these conditions.

[Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in dermatology : Role in the treatment of skin diseases]. / Phosphodiesterase-4-Inhibitoren in der Dermatologie : Die Rolle in der Behandlung von Hautkrankheiten.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory skin diseases are of great social and medical importance and require effective drug therapy. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors represent a possible therapeutic option by regulating inflammatory processes. PDEs cause the release of proinflammatory cytokines by interfering with signaling pathways. The PDE4 inhibitors apremilast (treatment of psoriasis and Behçet's disease), roflumilast (treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and crisaborole (treatment of atopic dermatitis) are currently approved in Europe. PSORIASIS: Apremilast is used for second-line treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and has a favorable side effect profile. Topical PDE4 inhibitors are currently being researched and have not yet been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). ATOPIC DERMATITIS: The topical PDE4 inhibitor crisaborole was approved by the EMA in 2020 as a topical treatment alternative to glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors. Although the substance has shown good tolerability in studies and also alleviates the accompanying itching, it did not find its way onto the German market. BEHçET'S DISEASE: Apremilast is approved for the treatment of Behçet's disease in adults with refractory, severe oral ulcers. OUTLOOK: Case studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of systemic PDE4 inhibition in other skin diseases (including blistering autoimmune dermatoses, lichen planus, and acantholytic genodermatoses). The substances are also being researched and used to treat extracutaneous inflammatory diseases.

Apremilast as a Potential Targeted Therapy for Metabolic Syndrome in Patients with Psoriasis: An Observational Analysis.

Psoriasis (PsO) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis that often presents with erythematous, sharply demarcated lesions. Although psoriasis is primarily a dermatological disease, its immune-mediated pathogenesis produces systemic effects and is closely associated with various comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and diabetes mellitus type II (DMII). Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4) inhibitor, has shown promise in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis and is associated with potential cardiometabolic benefits. In a 12-month prospective observational study involving 137 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, we assessed changes in psoriasis clinimetric scores and metabolic profiles from baseline (T0) to 52 weeks (T1) to evaluate the efficacy of apremilast. After 52 weeks of apremilast treatment, we documented a statistically significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose levels. Our findings even suggest a potential synergistic effect among patients treated with apremilast, alongside concomitant statin and/or insulin therapy. Although the results of our study must be validated on a larger scale, the use of apremilast in the treatment of psoriatic patients with cardio-metabolic comorbidities yields promising results.

Successful treatment of Darier's disease with apremilast and review of reported cases.

Darier's disease (DD) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder caused by a mutation in ATP2A2, which encodes calcium (Ca2+) ATPase pumps in the endoplasmic reticulum. In this report, we present the first documented case in Japan successfully treated with apremilast. An 18-year-old female presented with red or brown hyperkeratotic papules and plaques on her head, neck, and chest. Histopathological examination revealed a hyperkeratotic, acanthotic epidermis, along with suprabasal acantholysis characterized by corps ronds and grains. Exome sequencing of DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells identified a missense mutation in ATP2A2. Based on the above results, we diagnosed her with DD despite the absence of a family history. Given the effectiveness of apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in treating Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD), a genetically related disorder involving ATPases in epidermal calcium channels, we opted for apremilast therapy. Eight weeks post-initiation, significant improvement was observed in the patient's skin lesions on the head, neck, and chest. In this paper, we discuss the successful treatment of DD and HHD cases with apremilast, providing insights into its therapeutic potential, and offer a comprehensive review.

Diabetes and obesity burden and improvements in cardiometabolic parameters in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis receiving apremilast in a real-world setting.

Introduction: Patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis have a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic comorbidities compared to the general population. Clinical data suggest apremilast may reduce weight and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Objective: To describe changes in cardiometabolic parameters among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis newly treated with apremilast by prediabetes/diabetes or obesity status. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records from patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis in the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud who newly initiated apremilast. Changes from baseline in body mass index, weight, HbA1c, and lipids were evaluated at 6 and 12 months using a multivariable linear regression model stratified by prediabetes/diabetes or obesity status. Results: Of 8487 patients initiating apremilast, 24% had diabetes. Of 8250 patients with body mass index available, 27% were obese and 34% were severely obese. Patients experienced decreases in body mass index and weight at 6 and 12 months regardless of diabetes or obesity status, with the greatest reductions seen in those with diabetes and obesity. Reductions in HbA1c at 6 months were seen in patients without diabetes and patients with severe obesity. Conclusions: Treatment with apremilast may provide the greatest cardiometabolic benefit to those with the greatest burden of cardiometabolic disease.

Activity of apremilast in a patient with severe pemphigus vulgaris: case report.

Introduction: Although the treatment for pemphigus vulgaris (PV) has been revolutionized by the use of rituximab combined with corticosteroids, new effective therapies with a better safety profile are needed. Observation: A 67-year-old woman was diagnosed with severe mucosal PV, which was initially misdiagnosed as atypical Behçet's disease. Following an unsuccessful colchicine treatment, significant improvement was observed upon the introduction of apremilast: reduced pain, fewer lesions, and a stabilized weight. The discontinuation of apremilast led to a rapid relapse. Retrospective analysis through anti-Dsg3 ELISA indicated a gradual decrease in antibody levels during the apremilast treatment. Discussion: Apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor approved for psoriasis and Behçet's disease's related oral ulcers treatment, demonstrated its efficacy in this PV case. This is the second case report highlighting the effectiveness of apremilast for PV treatment. Apremilast's ability to upregulate cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels appears to contribute to the stabilization of keratinocyte adhesion. Conclusion: Apremilast may be a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of pemphigus, with an innovative mechanism of action, no induced immunosuppression, and good tolerance. It could be a good alternative to steroids, in the treatment regimen of steroids combined with rituximab.

Apremilast treatment for pediatric inverse psoriasis.

A 10-year-old boy presented with persistent genital erythematous plaques unresponsive to traditional topical treatments. Apremilast, an underexplored option in pediatric cases, was initiated and resulted in a significant reduction in pruritus and resolution of the lesions. This case provides insight into the potential efficacy of apremilast in refractory pediatric inverse psoriasis and underscores the necessity for further research in this specific population.

Fabrication and characterization of apremilast-loaded zinc oxide-mesoporous silica nanoparticles for psoriasis treatment.

Aim: The study was aimed to formulate and evaluate apremilast-loaded zinc oxide-mesoporous silica nanoparticles for treatment of psoriasis. Materials & methods: Mesoporous silica nanoparticles were prepared by using sol-gel method and evaluated for particle size, in vitro drug release, in vitro cytotoxicity study and in vivo pharmacodynamic study. Results: The synthesized mesoporous silica nanoparticles showed particle size of 319.9 ± 3.9 nm, with 24 ± 0.217% of loading capacity. In vitro cytotoxicity study on A-431 cell line showed increased anti-psoriatic activity of apremilast-loaded zinc oxide-mesoporous silica nanoparticles. In vivo pharmacodynamic study and histological studies showed improved efficacy of drug in imiquimod-induced psoriasis mice model. Conclusion: The apremilast-loaded zinc oxide-mesoporous silica nanoparticles showed improved therapeutic efficacy, suggesting that they are promising approach for topical treatment of psoriasis.

[Box: see text].

Exploratory Efficacy Evaluation of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: 32-Week Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, chronic dermatitis that greatly impacts functioning and quality of life and can be difficult to treat. Approved treatment options for PPP are limited, and many patients do not fully respond to current treatments. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in Japanese patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks followed by an extension phase where all patients received apremilast through week 32. PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI), modified PPPASI (which evaluates pustules and vesicles separately), and Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) total scores and subscores (erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales) were evaluated over 32 weeks of apremilast treatment. Achievement of ≥ 50% improvement in PPPASI (PPPASI-50) was evaluated at week 16 among baseline demographic and clinical characteristic subgroups. RESULTS: At week 16, improvements in total score and subscores for PPPASI, modified PPASI, and PPSI, as well as rates of PPPASI-50 were at least moderately greater with apremilast than placebo. Mean PPPASI total score decreased by - 68.3% from baseline to week 32 with continued apremilast treatment. At week 32, mean change from baseline in PPPASI/modified PPPASI subscores ranged from - 58.5% to - 77.0% with apremilast. At week 32, PPSI total score for physician and patient assessments decreased by - 51.3% and - 40.0%, respectively, with continued apremilast treatment. PPPASI-50 response at week 16 was greater with apremilast versus placebo in most demographic and baseline characteristic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in all PPPASI and PPSI total scores and subscores observed with apremilast over 16 weeks were maintained through 32 weeks in patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Rates of PPPASI-50 response at week 16 were mostly consistent across patient subgroups. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT04057937.

Cumulative Benefit Over 52 Weeks With Deucravacitinib Versus Apremilast in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: POETYK PSO-1 Post Hoc Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Deucravacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy to apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 clinical trials. In the study reported here, we aimed to determine the overall 52-week cumulative clinical benefit of treatment initiated with deucravacitinib versus apremilast and to compare the 52-week cumulative benefit of initiating and staying on deucravacitinib versus initiating apremilast and continuing or switching to deucravacitinib at week 24 of treatment. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of POETYK PSO-1 data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03624127) determined the cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily and apremilast 30 mg twice daily in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Patients treated with apremilast who did not achieve a 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 24 were switched to deucravacitinib. The cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib versus apremilast over 52 weeks was based on cumulative measures of ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in PASI score (PASI 75) and the proportion of patients with a static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1). Ratios of area under the curve estimates between treatments were calculated and compared based on analysis of covariance regression models. RESULTS: Patients initiating deucravacitinib (N = 332) had a greater cumulative benefit as measured by the PASI 75 and sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast (N = 168). Over 52 weeks, those initiating deucravacitinib experienced 50% more benefit as measured by PASI 75 and 58% more benefit as measured by sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast. Results were consistent with the primary analysis when patients were classified by prior systemic and prior biologic therapy exposure. CONCLUSION: Results from this analysis corroborate the primary efficacy analysis supporting the use of deucravacitinib compared with apremilast for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, regardless of prior systemic or biologic use.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Apremilast Tablets in Chinese Healthy Subjects Under Fasting and Postprandial States.

Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetics, safety and bioequivalence (BE) of generic and original apremilast tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions, providing sufficient evidence for abbreviated new drug application. Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-formulation, single-dose, two-period crossover pharmacokinetic study was performed. Thirty-two eligible healthy Chinese subjects were enrolled in fasting and postprandial studies, respectively. In each trial, subjects received a single 30-mg dose of the test or reference apremilast tablet, followed by a 7-day washout interval between periods. Serial blood samples were obtained for up to 48 h post-intake in each period, and the plasma concentrations of apremilast were determined by a validated method. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞), were calculated using the non-compartmental method. The geometric mean ratios of the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were acquired for bioequivalence analysis. The safety of both formulations was also evaluated. Results: Under fasting and postprandial states, the PK parameters of the test drug were similar to those of the reference drug. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the test to reference formulations were 94.09-103.44% for Cmax, 94.05-103.51% for AUC0-t, and 94.56-103.86% for AUC0-∞ under fasting conditions, and 99.18-112.48% for Cmax, 98.79-106.02% for AUC0-t, and 98.95-105.89% for AUC0-∞ under postprandial conditions, all of which were within the bioequivalence range of 80.00-125.00%. Both formulations were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred during the study. Conclusion: The trial confirmed that the PK parameters of the generic and original apremilast tablets were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial states, which met the predetermined regulatory standards. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration: chinaDrugtrials.org.cn, identifier CTR20191056 (July 30, 2019); chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300076806 (October 19, 2023).

Efficacy of apremilast in hyperkeratotic hand and foot dermatitis: results from a randomized observer-blinded comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkeratotic hand and foot dermatitis significantly affects quality of life. Some patients respond suboptimally to topical corticosteroids and have multiple recurrences. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of apremilast and topical corticosteroid versus corticosteroid alone in hyperkeratotic hand and foot dermatitis. METHODS: This randomized controlled study involved 77 patients treated for 3 months. Group A (39 patients) received mometasone furoate 0.1% cream with oral apremilast 30 mg twice daily, and Group B (38 patients) received mometasone alone. They were assessed monthly using the Hand Eczema Clinical Severity Index (HECSI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pruritus. Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) were conducted at the end of 3 months. RESULTS: The HECSI, VAS score, and QOLHEQ showed a significant decrease in both groups from baseline to the third month. Intergroup comparisons of HECSI failed to reach the significance level. When compared, patients receiving apremilast had significantly better improvement in the third month according to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA). They also had a smaller number of flares. CONCLUSION: Adding apremilast to topical corticosteroid leads to better patient and physician-perceived improvement and reduces the number of flares in hyperkeratotic hand eczema.

Consistent Efficacy of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis Regardless of Baseline Disease Severity or Special Area Involvement: Subgroup Analysis from PROMINENT.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis involvement in special areas (e.g., scalp or nails) is associated with a great disease burden yet it is often inadequately treated with topical treatments. The efficacy and tolerability of apremilast plus existing topical therapy in Japanese patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis were demonstrated in PROMINENT, a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. We evaluated the efficacy of apremilast across disease severities and special areas involved in these patients. METHODS: In PROMINENT, patients received apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 16 weeks in addition to their existing topical therapy, with the option of topical therapy reduction at the discretion of their physician while continuing apremilast treatment from Weeks 16 to 32. We performed a post hoc analysis, assessing apremilast efficacy and safety in Japanese patients stratified by baseline static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score (2 [mild] or 3 [moderate]) and special area involvement. RESULTS: Of patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3, 62.7% and 30.7%, respectively, achieved sPGA score 0 or 1 at Week 32. At Week 32, improvements in skin, nail, scalp, and quality of life assessments were observed regardless of baseline sPGA score. Improvements in these endpoints at Week 32 were also observed in patients with special area (scalp or nail) involvement (n = 134). Incidence of adverse events was similar between patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3. CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast in combination with topical therapy may be a beneficial treatment for Japanese patients, who have limited systemic treatment options for mild to moderate psoriasis or psoriasis in special areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03930186.

Safety and effectiveness of apremilast in Japanese patients with psoriatic disease: Results of a post-marketing surveillance study.

The safety and efficacy of apremilast in psoriatic disease has been demonstrated in clinical trials, including in Japanese patients. This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted after approval of apremalast in Japan in 2016 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the drug in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in routine clinical practice. Patients (enrolled between September 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019), were observed for 12 months after apremilast treatment initiation or until discontinuation or withdrawal. Safety was assessed by evaluating adverse reactions (ARs) and serious ARs. Effectiveness measures in PsO included the proportion of patients who achieved global improvement and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scores of 0/1 and the change from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) after 6 and 12 months treatment. The safety analysis set included 1063 patients (PsO, n = 992; PsA, n = 127). ARs and serious ARs were reported in 29.4% and 0.7% of patients, respectively; most occurred <1 month after apremilast initiation. There were no reports of fatal ARs, serious infections, hypersensitivity, or vasculitis. No new safety signals were identified. Among the key survey items, gastrointestinal disorders were the most common ARs (21.3%). In patients with PsO, after 6 and 12 months of treatment, effectiveness rates of achieving highly effective or effective global improvement of were 90.9% and 93.8%; PGA 0/1 was achieved by 42.7% and 58.1% of patients; mean decrease from baseline in total DLQI score was 4.2 (p < 0.0001) and 5.7 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Effectiveness was evaluated in a small number of patients with PsA for some measures; after 6 and 12 months of treatment, improvements were observed in global improvement effectiveness rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints score, Visual Analog Scale score, and DLQI score. We conclude that orally administered apremilast was well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with PsO and/or PsA enrolled in this post-marketing surveillance study.

Exploring relief for Behçet's disease refractory oral ulcers: a comparison of TNF inhibitors versus apremilast.

OBJECTIVES: Oral and genital ulcers are the hallmark manifestation of Behçet's disease (BD), significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Our study focuses on comparing the effectiveness and safety of TNF inhibitors (TNFis) and apremilast in controlling oral ulcers of BD, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance for physicians in selecting appropriate treatment modalities. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on BD patients treated between December 2016 and December 2021 with TNFis or apremilast for refractory oral ulcers. The study assessed treatment response by the absence of oral ulcers at 3 and 6 months, with additional evaluations for genital ulcers and articular involvement. RESULTS: The study included 78 patients, equally allocated between TNFis and apremilast treatments. Both groups showed significant oral ulcer reduction at 3 (p< 0.001) and 6 months (p= 0.01) with no significant difference between the treatments. Apremilast had a notable corticosteroid-sparing effect by the 3-month follow-up, persisting through 6 months. Both treatments were equally effective in reducing genital ulcers, with TNFis showing greater effectiveness in addressing articular involvement. Apremilast had a higher discontinuation rate due to gastrointestinal side effects. CONCLUSION: TNFis and apremilast are both effective for treating BD refractory oral ulcers. While TNFis may offer broader benefits for other disease manifestations, apremilast is distinguished by its corticosteroid-sparing effect, especially for patients with a milder disease phenotype. Treatment selection should consider individual disease severity and clinical features to ensure a personalized and effective management strategy.

Formulation characterization of lecithin organogel as topical drug delivery system for psoriasis: In-vitro permeation and preclinical evaluation.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory and proliferative skin disease that causes pathological skin changes and has a substantial impact on the quality of patient life. Apremilast was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an oral medication for psoriasis and is beneficial in mild to moderate conditions for chronic usage. However, 5%-7% of withdrawals were reported due to severe side effects. To address the issue, a localized drug delivery strategy via the topical route may be a viable approach. However, poor physicochemical properties make it vulnerable to passing through the skin, requiring a specialized drug delivery system to demonstrate its full potential via a topical route like lecithin organogel. The formulation was optimized by screening the suitable lecithin type and non-polar solvents based on the gel formation ability of lecithin and the solubility of apremilast in the solvent. The pseudo-ternary diagram was used to optimize the water content required to form the gel. The optimized gel was found to be shear thinning characterized for rheological parameters, in-vitro diffusion studies, and in-vitro skin distribution studies. Preclinical studies in Imiquimod-induced mice showed a better reduction in severity index, cytokine levels, and epidermal hyperplasia from the lecithin organogel group compared to the apremilast oral administration and marketed standard topical gel group. Based on these results, lecithin organogel can be considered a promising approach to deliver molecules like apremilast by topical route in psoriatic-like conditions.