Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME), a chronic microvascular complication of diabetes, is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can restore the normal macular structure and reduce macular edema, whereas internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is used to treat tractional macular diseases. Despite the advantages, there is limited research on the combined effects of PPV with ILM peeling. AIM: To observe the effects of PPV combined with ILM peeling on postoperative central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cystoid macular edema (CME) volume, and complications in patients with DME. METHODS: Eighty-one patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with DME at the Beijing Shanqu Liangxiang Hospital between January and December 2022 were randomly divided to undergo PPV alone (control group: 41 patients, 47 eyes) or PPV + ILM peeling (stripping group: 40 patients, 45 eyes); a single surgeon performed all surgeries. The two groups were compared preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, both groups had comparable values of CMT, BCVA, and CME volume (P > 0.05). After surgery (both 1 and 3 months), both groups showed significant reductions in CMT, BCVA, and CME volume compared to preoperative levels, with the stripping group showing more significant reductions compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Further repeated-measures ANOVA analysis for within-group differences revealed significant effects of group and time, and interaction effects for CMT, BCVA, and CME volume (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between the groups (retinal detachment: control = 2, stripping = 1; endophthalmitis: Control = 4, stripping = 1; no cases of secondary glaucoma or macular holes; χ 2 = 0.296, P = 0.587). CONCLUSION: PPV with ILM peeling can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients with DME, reduce CMT, and improve CME with fewer complications.

Safety and Efficiency of Anti-VEGF with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Non-Ischemic Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Prospective, Case-controlled, Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF combined with dexamethasone implant for the retinal vein occlusion patients with macular edema. METHODS: In this prospective, case-controlled, cohort clinical trial (Register ID: ChiCTR2400080048), patients with non-ischemic retinal vein occlusion were enrolled from the Sanmenxia Central Hospital from August 2020 to April 2023. The patients were randomized into two groups. All the patients received ranibizumab intravitreal injection in the first 3 consecutive months. For the ranibizumab group, anti-VEGF injections were as needed thereafter in case of recurrence of macular edema; For the combination group, the patients received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection at 15 days after the first ranibizumab injection. The primary outcome measurements were improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduction in central macular thickness (CMT). The secondary outcomes were recurrence of macular edema, number of intravitreal injections, and injection interval. Safety profiles were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were included, of which 73 patients completed all follow-ups. Both the ranibizumab monotherapy and the combination therapy significantly improved BCVA at all time points, compared to the baseline. The combined group achieved more BCVA improvement in 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, compared to the ranibizumab alone group. Compared to the baseline, both groups achieved significant reductions in CMT at all follow-ups. However, the combination group showed more CMT reduction at 1 week post injection, compared to the ranibizumab group. The combination group had a significantly longer injection interval, lower injection time, and recurrence of macular edema. Ocular hypertension was the most common adverse events. Lastly, intraocular pressure was all well controlled by 1-3 glaucoma medications without surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The combination therapy could significantly improve the BCVA and reduce the CMT with a good safety profile.

Compound electrolyte intraocular irrigating solution produces better effects on vision recovery of cataract patients after surgery than Ringer lactate solution.

PURPOSE: Intraocular irrigating solution is extensively applied in cataract surgery. This paper explored the difference and relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical quality analysis system (OQAS) parameters induced by compound electrolyte intraocular irrigating solution (CEIIS) or Ringer lactate (RL) solution during uncomplicated cataract surgery. METHODS: Totally 200 senior cataract patients were randomly divided into the CEIIS and RL groups (N = 100 patients/group). The anterior chamber was irrigated by CEIIS or RL during phacoemulsification. Patients were subdivided into diabetes mellitus (DM)+ and DM- groups. The central macular thickness (CMT), hyper reflective foci (HF), modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cutoff), Strehl ratio (SR), objective scatter index (OSI), and OQAS values (OVs) at 100%, 20%, and 9% contrast levels were measured preoperatively and 1 day and 1 week after operation using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and OQAS II, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Snellen scale, followed by statistical analysis of its logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the CEIIS and RL groups. Both groups exhibited notably increased postoperative CMT, MTF cutoff, SR, OV at 100%, 20%, and 9% contrast levels, and reduced OSI, indicating CEIIS and RL improved postoperative visual quality. CEIIS surpassed RL solution in improving postoperative visual quality, decelerating the increase of macular HF numbers and CMT in DM+ patients and postoperative BCVA. There was no difference between CEIIS and RL in long-term vision improvement. CONCLUSION: CEIIS surpasses RL in postoperative visual recovery and retards increases of macular HF numbers and CMT in senior DM+ cataract patients.

Comparison of macular changes and visual outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification surgery for high myopic cataract patients.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate differences in log MAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and postoperative central foveal thickness (CFT) and choroidal thickness (CT) changes between conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) for high-myopia cataracts. METHODS: This was a retrospective and observational study. One hundred and two eyes of 102 patients with high-myopia cataracts were examined. CPS was performed in 54 eyes, and FLACS was performed in 48 eyes. All eyes underwent logMAR BCVA, CFT and CT of three different sectors preoperatively and one week and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: The logMAR BCVA improved significantly after surgery in both groups (both P < 0.001), but no difference was observed in BCVA improvement between the groups (P = 0.554). Moreover, no significant differences were reflected in the changes in CFT, nasal 1 mm CT or temporal 1 mm CT between the two groups, and only subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in the CPS group decreased significantly compared with that in the FLACS group at any postoperative time (P = 0.003 and 0.026). AL, preoperative logMAR BCVA, and CT of the three regions exhibited a notable correlation with postoperative BCVA (all P < 0.05) according to univariate logistic regression analysis. However, only the AL, preoperative logMAR BCVA and SFCT remained significant in the multivariate model. Postoperative logMAR BCVA revealed a positive correlation with AL and preoperative logMAR BCVA but a negative correlation with SFCT. CONCLUSIONS: FLACS was not superior to CPS in improving BCVA but had less impact on SFCT in the treatment of high-myopia cataracts. Eyes with a longer AL, worse preoperative logMAR BCVA and thinner SFCT had a high risk of worse postoperative BCVA.

Comparing the efficacy of glucocorticoids and anti-VEGF in treating diabetic macular edema: systematic review and comprehensive analysis.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to better understand the efficacy of various drugs, such as glucocorticoids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), and to evaluate various clinical treatment regimens consisting of different therapeutic measures. Methods: This study included randomized controlled trials up to February 2023 comparing the efficacy of corticosteroid-related therapy and anti-VEGF therapy. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched, and the quality of the studies was carefully assessed. Finally, 39 studies were included. Results: Results at 3-month followup showed that intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) + triamcinolone acetonide (TA) was the most beneficial in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing the thickness of macular edema in the center of the retina in patients with DME. Results at 6-month follow-up showed that intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) was the most effective in improving patients' bestcorrected visual acuity and reducing the thickness of central macular edema. Discussion: Overall, IVB+TA was beneficial in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing central macular edema thickness over a 3-month follow-up period, while DEX implants had a better therapeutic effect than anti-VEGF agents at 6 months, especially the patients with severe macular edema and visual acuity impaired. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=397100, identifier CRD42023397100.

Real-World Evidence of the Long-Term Effectiveness of 0.2 µg/Day Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Persistent and Recurrent Diabetic Macular Edema - A Single Center Study.

Purpose: To report the long-term functional, anatomical and safety outcomes of 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide 0.19mg in patients with persistent or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Retrospective, observational, single-center study of patients with recurrent or persistent DME. All patients received 0.2 µg/day of fluocinolone acetonide 0.19mg, and data were collected at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 after implantation. Outcomes measured included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and safety outcomes. Results: A total of 28 eyes from 28 patients were included. The mean age was 66.5 years (95% CI 62.8-70.2) with a mean duration of DME of 8.8 years (95% CI 7.7-10.0). Only two eyes were phakic. Mean follow-up was 25.4 months (95% CI 21.2-29.6). Mean BCVA at baseline was 48.6 ETDRS letters (95% CI 41.3-55.8) and improved as early as month 1 of follow-up with a mean gain in BCVA of 7.8 (95% CI 4.3-11.3) ETDRS letters (p<0.001). Statistically significant improvements in BCVA were also observed at months 6, 12 and 24. At baseline, patients had a mean CMT of 530.5µm (95% CI 463.0-598.0), and a decrease in CMT was observed, starting at the first month of follow-up (mean CMT reduction of -170.5µm, 95% CI -223.8- -117.1; p<0.001). Statistically significant decreases in CMT were also observed at months 6, 12, 24, and 36, with the maximum decrease observed at month 12 (p<0.001). Mean IOP at baseline was 16.4mmHg (95% CI 15.3-17.5) and nine eyes (32.1%) had an IOP ≥21mmHg during follow-up. Conclusion: Our results support the effectiveness and safety profile of fluocinolone acetonide. Although additional long-term real-world evidence is required, fluocinolone acetonide may represent a safe strategy for daily, low-dose, sustained and localized release to the posterior segment of the eye, providing both functional and anatomical benefits in DME.

Clinical effects of atorvastatin combined with conbercept in the treatment of patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and carotid plaque: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs have been widely used in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO); however, recurrence is a major concern. This study aims to observe the clinical effects of atorvastatin and intravitreal therapy in the treatment of patients with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent carotid plaques (CP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Sixty-four patients diagnosed with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent CP will be enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the control and experimental groups. The control group will be treated with intravitreal conbercept monthly for 3 months, followed by monthly evaluation and injection of pro re nata (PRN) for 12 months, while the experimental group will be treated with oral atorvastatin 20 mg daily combined with the control group treatment. If a drop of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is more than five Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (one line) or an increment in central subfield thickness (CSFT) of 100 µm (or a 10% increment from the previous visit), intravitreal re-treatment will be performed. Outcome measurements include CSFT, BCVA, number of injections, and incidence of adverse events during the 12-month follow-up period. Differences between groups will be evaluated using Student's t-test, and comparisons between groups will be evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China (approval number 2023KY0418-12, dated 18 April 2023), and has been registered on chictr.org.cn. Written informed consent will be collected from each patient and the results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300071359. Registered on 12 May 2023.

Clinical features of COVID-19-related optic neuritis: a retrospective study.

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical features of optic neuritis associated with COVID-19 (COVID-19 ON), comparing them with neuromyelitis optica-associated optic neuritis (NMO-ON), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated optic neuritis (MOG-ON), and antibody-negative optic neuritis (antibody-negative ON). Methods: Data from 117 patients (145 eyes) with optic neuritis at the Shantou International Eye Center (March 2020-June 2023) were categorized into four groups based on etiology: Group 1 (neuromyelitis optica-related optic neuritis, NMO-ON), Group 2 (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein optic neuritis, MOG-ON), Group 3 (antibody-negative optic neuritis, antibody-negative ON), and Group 4 (optic neuritis associated with COVID-19, COVID-19 ON). Characteristics of T2 and enhancement in orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were assessed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was compared before treatment, at a short-term follow-up (14 days), and at the last follow-up after treatment. Results: The COVID-19-associated optic neuritis (COVID-19 ON) group exhibited 100% bilateral involvement, significantly surpassing other groups (P < 0.001). Optic disk edema was observed in 100% of COVID-19 ON cases, markedly differing from neuromyelitis optica-related optic neuritis (NMO-ON) (P = 0.023). Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed distinctive long-segment lesions without intracranial involvement in T1-enhanced sequences for the COVID-19 ON group compared to the other three groups (P < 0.001). Discrepancies in optic nerve sheath involvement were noted between the COVID-19 ON group and both NMO-ON and antibody-negative optic neuritis (antibody-negative ON) groups (P = 0.028). Before treatment, no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) existed between the COVID-19 ON group and other groups. At the 14-day follow-up, BCVA in the COVID-19 ON group outperformed the NMO-ON (P < 0.001) and antibody-negative ON (P = 0.028) groups, with no significant difference observed compared to the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein optic neuritis (MOG-ON) group. At the last follow-up after treatment, BCVA in the COVID-19 ON group significantly differed from the NMO-ON group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Optic neuritis associated with COVID-19 (COVID-19 ON) predominantly presents with bilateral onset and optic disk edema. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates that COVID-19 ON presents as long-segment enhancement without the involvement of the intracranial segment of the optic nerve in T1-enhanced images. Glucocorticoid therapy showed positive outcomes.

Visual outcome of various dose of glucocorticoids treatment in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy- a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objective of this investigation was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of distinct glucocorticoid therapy dosages in the management of acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, unmasked, and non-randomized study included a total of 85 patients. The patients were categorized into four groups: Group 1 (control) consisted of 15 patients who did not receive glucocorticoids, Group 2 included 16 patients administered with oral prednisone at a dosage of 1 mg/kg/d for 14 days, Group 3 comprised 30 patients who received 250 units of methylprednisolone once daily for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone at a dosage of 1 mg/kg/d for 11 days, and Group 4 encompassed 24 patients who received 500 units of methylprednisolone once daily for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone at a dosage of 1 mg/kg/d for 11 days. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed at baseline and the final follow-up (> 7 days post-treatment). The changes in visual acuity between baseline and the 7-14 day follow-up, as well as between baseline and the concluding appraisal, were employed as metrics for assessing the extent of visual enhancement. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in the final visual outcomes or in the changes between final visual acuity and baseline across the four groups. In Group 1 (control), the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained unchanged during final follow-ups compared to baseline. Conversely, the intervention groups exhibited statistically significant enhancements in BCVA during final follow-up (p = 0.012, p = 0.03, and p = 0.009 for Group 2, Group 3, and Group 4, respectively) when compared to baseline. During the 7-14 day follow-up, there was a significant difference in the changes between baseline BCVA and follow-up BCVA across the groups (p = 0.035). Go a step further by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, group 4 showed a greater change in vision compared with group1 (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Our study on acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) showed no significant final visual outcome differences. Nevertheless, Groups 2, 3, and 4 demonstrated improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) during the final follow-up. Notably, a 500-unit dose of methylprednisolone resulted in short-term BCVA enhancement. This suggests potential consideration of 500 units of methylprednisolone for short-term NAION vision improvement, despite its limited long-term impact.

Is Intravitreal Injection of Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Effective for the Treatment of Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema in Patients With Posterior Vitreous Detachment?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intravitreal injection of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) is effective for the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients who already had posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). METHODS: It is a retrospective chart review of the patients with refractory DME and PVD. The efficacy of intravitreal injection of rTPA was assessed based on the changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in these patients. RESULTS: Nine eyes of nine patients as the study group and 14 eyes of the 14 patients as the control group were examined. Before the injections, the mean CMT was 470.0± 107.6 in the study group, compared to 536.2± 150.5 in the control group, with no statistical significance (p=0.403). The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the mean changes in CMT from baseline to one and three months after injections between the study and control groups (p=0.439, p=0.781, respectively). Likewise, no statistically significant disparities were observed in the mean pre-injection BCVA between the study group (0.877± 0.349) and the control group (0.950± 0.300) (p=0.415). Additionally, after three months of injection, there were no significant changes in the mean BCVA of the study group (0.844± 0.304) and the control group (0.864± 0.253) (p=0.512). CONCLUSION: This study showed that rTPA has no effect on changes in CMT and BCVA in patients who had refractory DME and PVD at the same time. This may suggest that the improvement in CMT in previous studies may be due to the induction of PVD.

Real-World Experience with Brolucizumab Compared to Aflibercept in Treatment-Naïve and Therapy-Refractory Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.

Background: To report on the outcome of intravitreal brolucizumab compared to aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Prospective, observational, study in 35 eyes of 24 patients with a loading dose of five injections of 6 mg brolucizumab every 6 weeks (q6w, treatment-naïve eyes) or a minimum of two injections of brolucizumab q6w after the switch (recalcitrant DME eyes), followed by a treat and extend (T&E) regimen. The results were compared with 40 eyes of 31 DME patients who were treated with aflibercept. The data were obtained from the Berlin Macula Registry. The primary outcome measure was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 36. Secondary outcome measures were the change in central retinal thickness (CRT) and the treatment intervals until week 36. Results: BCVA increased significantly in treatment-naïve DME eyes treated with either brolucizumab (+0.12 logMAR, +6.4 letters, p = 0.03) or aflibercept (+0.19 logMAR, +9.5 letters, p = 0.001). In recalcitrant DME eyes, BCVA also increased significantly after switching to brolucizumab (+0.1 logMAR, +5 letters, p = 0.006) or aflibercept (+0.11 logMAR, +5.5 letters, p = 0.02). All treatment-naïve and recalcitrant DME eyes had a significant decrease in CRT after treatment with brolucizumab (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001) or aflibercept (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.03). At week 36, the mean treatment interval for brolucizumab was 11.3 weeks, while for aflibercept, it was 6.5 weeks for treatment-naïve eyes and 9.3 weeks vs. 5.3 weeks for pretreated eyes. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, patients with treatment-naïve and recalcitrant DME showed a favorable response to brolucizumab and aflibercept therapy, with a reduced injection frequency after brolucizumab treatment.

Relationship between visual acuity and OCT angiography parameters in diabetic retinopathy eyes after treatment.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between visual acuity and OCT angiography parameters in diabetic retinopathy eyes after treatment, and to analyze the relative factors in PDR eyes. METHODS: A total of 89 eyes, including 42 eyes with non-PDR (NPDR), and 47 eyes after vitrectomy with PDR were included and underwent OCTA. All images were processed by Python or FIJI. Multivariable linear regression models were used to analyze the associations between postoperative BCVA and OCTA parameters in PDR patients. RESULTS: Postoperative OCTA parameters including deep capillary plexus (DCP) parafoveal and perifoveal vessel density (VD), DCP parafoveal and perifoveal vessel length density (VLD), DCP fractal dimension (FD), choriocapillaris plexus (CCP) VD, CCP VLD, were significantly lower in the PDR group than in the NPDR group. In the superficial capillary plexus (SCP), we found a negative correlation between the postoperative BCVA and VD (parafovea: ß coefficient = -0.351, p = 0.023; perifovea: ß coefficient = -0.338, p = 0.036). Perifoveal VLD (ß coefficient = -0.343, p = 0.031) and FD (ß coefficient = -0.375, p = 0.016) of the SCP were also negatively correlated with postoperative BCVA. Regarding the DCP, perifoveal VD (ß coefficient = -0.396, p = 0.008), perifoveal VLD (ß coefficient = -0.334, p = 0.025), vessel tortuosity (VT) (ß coefficient = -0.369, p = 0.015) were negatively correlated with postoperative BCVA. In CCP, VLD (ß coefficient = -0.373, p = 0.023) and number of flow voids (ß coefficient = -0.334, p = 0.036) exhibited a negative association with postoperative BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative BCVA of PDR patients was related to OCTA parameters of the SCP (parafoveal and perifoveal VD, perifoveal VLD and FD), DCP (perifoveal VD, VLD, and VT) and CCP (VLD and number of flow voids).

The prevalence of glaucoma in a 70-year-old Swedish population in the city area of Gothenburg.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for open-angle glaucoma in a population of 70-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden and to compare the visual function between the glaucoma population and the non-glaucoma population. METHODS: Of the entire cohort (n = 1203), 1182 participants responded a questionnaire on self-reported glaucoma and were tested for blood pressure (BP) and diabetes. In all, 560 participants underwent ophthalmic examination including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), contrast sensitivity (CS), perimetry and photos of the retina and lens. RESULTS: Glaucoma prevalence was 4.8% (95% confidence interval, 3.0%-6.6%), of which 56% was previously undiagnosed. The proportion of participants with diastolic BP >90 mmHg was higher in the non-glaucomatous group (8.3%) than the glaucoma group (0%), p < 0.001. A family history of glaucoma was present in a larger proportion of the glaucoma group (39%) than of the non-glaucomatous group (1.1%), p = 0.001. Mean IOP in individuals without glaucoma was 16 mmHg, versus 21 mmHg in participants with glaucoma detected at the examination. IOP was ≤21 mmHg in 67% among participants with previously unknown glaucoma. BCVA was lower in eyes with previously unknown glaucoma than in eyes without glaucoma (p = 0.017) but BCVA in the best eye did not differ. CCT and CS were similar in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of glaucoma was comparable to that reported previously. A family history of glaucoma and higher IOP were risk factors associated with glaucoma. BCVA in the best eye did not differ significantly between subjects with and without glaucoma.

Changes in foveal avascular zone area and retinal vein diameter in patients with retinal vein occlusion detected by fundus fluorescein angiography.

Purpose: To investigate changes in foveal avascular area (FAZ) and retinal vein diameter in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) after intravitreal ranibizumab, and to analyze the correlation between ranibizumab therapy and visual gain. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 95 eyes of 95 patients who had accepted three consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections, including 50 branch RVOs (BRVOs) and 45 central RVOs (CRVOs). BRVOs were divided into ischemia group (n = 32) and non-ischemia group (n = 18), and CRVOs also had ischemia group (n = 28) and non-ischemia group (n = 17). Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed before the first injection and after 6, 12, and 24 months. The FAZ was manually circumscribed on early-phase images of fundus fluorescein angiography. Retinal vein diameters were measured on fundus photographs. Results: After three injections, the FAZ area was significantly enlarged firstly and then reduced in all ischemic RVOs and the non-ischemic BRVOs (p < 0.05), while the retinal vein diameter was significantly reduced firstly and then increased in all groups except for unobstructed branch veins of non-ischemic BRVOs (p < 0.05). The correlation between the FAZ area and best corrected visual acuity was statistically significant in all CRVOs (non-ischemic, r = 0.372; ischemic, r = 0.286; p < 0.01) and ischemic BRVOs (r = 0.180, p < 0.05). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed that the retinal vein diameter was significantly correlated to the larger FAZ area in obstructed branch veins of ischemic BRVOs (r = -0.31, p < 0.01), inferior temporal branch veins of non-ischemic CRVOs (r = -0.461, p < 0.01) and ischemia CRVO groups (superior temporal branch vein, r = -0.226, p < 0.05; inferior temporal branch vein, r = -0.259, p < 0.01). Conclusion: After three consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections, the FAZ area was enlarged and retinal vein diameter reduced with gradual recovery to near baseline from 12 months. These results suggest that ranibizumab therapy can worsen macular ischemia and prevent visual gain in the short term. It has important significance for the treatment and prognosis of RVO, although the natural course of RVO may also affect ischemia and visual gain.

Safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept for the treatment of patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia: Results from the SHINY study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg conbercept in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia (pmCNV). METHODS: The 177 pmCNV patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive conbercept or sham injection, respectively. The conbercept group receive conbercept intravitreal injections administered on a pro re nata (PRN) basis after 3 monthly loading doses. The sham group received three consecutive monthly sham injections and then one conbercept injection followed by PRN conbercept intravitreal injections. RESULTS: At month 3, the mean BCVA for the two groups were improved by 12.0 letters (conbercept group, from 54.05 letters to 66.05 letters) and 0.6 letters (sham group, from 49.77 letters to 50.33 letters), respectively (p < 0.001). The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) at month 3 in the two groups decreased 62.0 µm (conbercept group, from 348.90 µm to 286.18 µm) and 4.4 µm (sham group, from 347.86 µm to 343.47 µm) (p < 0.001). At month 9, the mean BCVA improved by 13.3 letters in the conbercept group and 11.3 letters in the sham group. The mean CRT decreased 73.6 µm in the conbercept group and 55.9 µm in the sham group (p < 0.001). The most common ocular adverse events were associated with intravitreal injections, such as conjunctival haemorrhage and increased intraocular pressure. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg conbercept provided improvement in visual and anatomical outcomes in pmCNV patients with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events.

Switching to Conbercept in Diabetic Macular Edema After Unsatisfactory Response to Previous Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab.

Objective: To assess the functional and anatomical effects of transitioning to conbercept intravitreal injection (IVC) treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who had inadequate responses to prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. Methods: We retrospectively included eyes with persistent DME after at least 3 injections of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR). The analysis included the assessment of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) during 6 months after the switch. Results: A total of 30 patients (30 eyes) were included. CMT dropped sharply from 437.8±40.67µm at baseline to 363.59±45.09,312.52 ± 39.15, 278.51 ± 37.92, and 292.59 ± 38.09 after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months of IVC, respectively (p <0.001). BCVA in log MAR units was significantly improved from 0.73±0.15 at baseline to 0.50±0.09,0.46±0.72, 0.40±0.06 and 0.48±0.04 after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months, respectively (p <0.001). Conclusion: Switching to Conbercept effectively improved visual and anatomical structure in DME patients who had not responded satisfactorily to previous anti-VEGF injections.

An atypical form of retinitis pigmentosa: A case report.

Key Clinical Message: This case contributes to the new knowledge of unilateral pericentral RP. Multimodal imaging provides valuable information to better understand the disease. The development is significantly slow and defines a better clinical course than typical RP. Pericentral RP presents with unremarkable night blindness, which can be easily misdiagnosed by ophthalmologists. Abstract: Unilateral pericentral retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a rare, atypical, mild form of RP that affects the pericentral retina close to the vascular arcades and tends to spare the far-peripheral retina in one eye, while the fellow eye remains completely unaffected. A 71-year-old Chinese woman presented with blurred vision in her right eye for several decades, however, her left eye was unaffected. Fundus photography revealed bone-spicule pigmentation located at the pericentral retina of her right eye. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography revealed significant atrophy of the outer retina and retinal pigment epithelium, and an evident absence of the ellipsoid zone in the right eye. The visual field showed a wide-range paracentral scotoma in the right eye. The full-field electroretinogram demonstrated subnormal amplitudes of dark and light adaption in the right eye. No significant changes were observed during a further 5-year follow-up. Multimodal imaging provides valuable information to better understand unilateral pericentral RP. The development of unilateral pericentral RP is significantly slow and defines a better clinical course than the typical RP. Pericentral RP presents with slight visual reduction and unremarkable night blindness, which can be easily misdiagnosis by ophthalmologists. Reasonable prevention measures, screening methods, and timely diagnosis are beneficial for RP patients.

The Evolution and Visual Prognosis of Glial Proliferation with Different Grades after Macular Hole Surgery: An Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: The glial proliferation after macular hole (MH) surgery was divided into two types previously: those replacing the entire intraretinal layer and those involving only the inner foveal layers. The evolution and prognosis of the former type were elaborated on in previous studies, but the latter one has received limited attention. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the evolution of glial proliferation with varying grades after MH surgery and its effects on foveal microstructure and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). METHODS: In this retrospective research, we reviewed 202 eyes from 196 consecutive patients who underwent a successful idiopathic MHs repair. Based on optical coherence tomography images, glial proliferation was classified into three types: A-type, which replaced the entire intraretinal layer; B-type, located at the level of and above the external limiting membrane (ELM); and C-type, situated above the ELM. RESULTS: Of the 67 eyes that attended the 1-, 4-, and 10-month follow-up, A-type, B-type, C-type, and no glial proliferation were identified in 27 (40.3%), 17 (25.4%), 20 (29.8%), and 3 eyes (4.5%), respectively, at 1 month. Within 10 months, the prevalence of A-type glial proliferation significantly decreased (p < 0.001), but the changes in B-type (p = 0.261), C-type (p = 0.151), and no glial proliferation (p = 0.492) were not significant. In 32 of the 67 eyes, the grade of glial proliferation gradually improved, with A-type transforming into B- or C-type in 19 of 27 eyes (70.4%), B-type into C-type or no glial proliferation in 11 out of 17 eyes (64.7%), and C-type gradually disappearing in 2 out of 20 eyes (10.0%). Among the eyes that attended at least one follow-up (1 M, 202 eyes; 4 M, 161 eyes; 10 M, 97 eyes), those with A-type glial proliferation showed the most defective outer retinal layers, worst BCVA, and thinnest central fovea compared with the other two types at all follow-up time points (p < 0.001). Eyes with C-type glial proliferation exhibited significantly better photoreceptor layer status and BCVA compared with those with B-type glial proliferation. A-type glial proliferation at 1 month, which showed significant association with BCVA at 10 months, could be accurately predicted by the minimum linear diameter with a cut-off >547.5 µm (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Within 10 months, A-type glial proliferation substantially resolves but the prevalence of B- and C-type remains unchanged. B-type glial proliferation hinders the restoration of photoreceptors and impairs visual recovery despite being located within the inner retina.

Intraoperative slow-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in epiretinal membrane peeling surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of the dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant for the regression of macular edema and the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after the removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial recruited 81 patients with idiopathic ERM. These patients all underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy combined with ERM and internal limiting membrane peeling surgery. Among them, 41 eyes in the DEX group received additional DEX implants and 40 in the non-DEX group did not. Outcomes including central retinal thickness (CRT), BCVA, and intraocular pressure were measured 1 and 3 months after surgery. Results: The DEX group had thinner CRTs compared to the non-DEX group at 1 month postoperatively (p <0.05), but did not differ significantly at the 1-week and 3-month follow-up visits (p = 0.109 and p = 0.417, respectively). There were no statistical differences with respect to BCVA (p = 0.499, 0.309, 0.246, and 0.517, respectively) and intraocular pressure (p = 0.556, 0.639, 0.741, and 0.517, respectively) between the two groups at each point of follow-up visits. Conclusion: DEX accelerated the reduction of CRT at 1 month after surgery. However, no evidence of further anatomical (CRT) or functional (BCVA) benefits using DEX was observed at 3 months. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05416827.

Role of preoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography in identifying intraoperative posterior capsular dehiscence in posterior polar cataract.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of preoperative posterior capsular dehiscence in posterior polar cataracts (PPCs) increases the chances of intraoperative posterior capsular rent. Our study aims to demonstrate the efficacy of preoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) to predict intraoperative posterior capsular rupture (PCR) in PPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational study including patients within 25-75 years of age, having PPC, undergoing phacoemulsification. ASOCT was done for evaluating preoperative posterior capsular status and was graded as "intact" or "dehiscent, and eventually ,intraoperative-posterior capsular status was noted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPSS (version 27.0) was used, and P value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: ASOCT of 44 eyes had 9 (20.5%) dehiscent posterior capsules and 35 (79.5%) intact. Out of these 9 eyes, 7 (77.8%) had intraoperative PCR and 2 (22.2%) did not. Out of these 35, 34 (97.1%) were actually intact intraoperatively and 1 (2.9%) had intraoperative PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of ASOCT for detecting dehiscence were 94.4% and 87.5%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 97.1 and 77.8, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the test was 95.45% with a Chi-square value of 27.01 (P < 0.0001). The diagnostic validity of ASOCT grading for detecting preoperative dehiscence was confirmed. The association between intraoperative PCR and preoperative dehiscence was statistically significant (Chi-square test - P < 0.0001). Our objective was established. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The demographics and clinical parameters were comparable with other studies. Two eyes with preoperative dehiscence on ASOCT had intact posterior capsule during surgery. The cause can be a dense opacity with increased optical density causing an obscured a clear capsule view on ASOCT, an artifact defect, giving a false impression of dehiscence. One eye who had nondehiscent PC on ASOCT was found to have PCR on the table, which can be due to an extremely thin PC or tightly adherent polar opacity to the capsule. According to our study, the diagnostic accuracy of ASOCT for detecting preoperative dehiscence was 94.4% (sensitivity)and of nondehiscence was 87.5%(specificity). 97.1% of eyes with dehiscence on ASOCT, had actual posterior capsular rent (positive predictive value). To conclude, ASOCT can be used as a reliable diagnostic modality.