Blastocoel fluid as an alternative source of DNA for minimally invasive PGT and biomarker of embryo competence.

The discovery of DNA in blastocoel fluid (BF-DNA) generated new perspectives in the potential development of simpler and safer alternative non-invasive tests in reproductive genetics. Short DNA fragments of apoptotic origin, together with specific expression patterns of pro- and anti-apoptotic genes in the blastocoel fluid of euploid and aneuploid embryos, suggest a self-correction mechanism to preferentially eliminate aneuploid cells, and purge defective and non-viable cells. The correlation of blastocoel fluid content with the genetic status of the whole embryo, and therefore its potential use in minimally invasive preimplantation genetic testing (miPGT), or as an indicator of embryo potential, remains uncertain and needs to be determined. The limited amount and compromised integrity of BF-DNA, with likely apoptotic origination, constrains its amplification, leading to low concordance and reproducibility rates for both aneuploidy screening and monogenic testing. While embryo genotyping constitutes a more ambitious goal, the presence of analysable DNA after amplification in blastocoel fluid may be used as a clinical biomarker of embryo competency to select the most viable embryo(s) for transfer, and potentially improve the implantation rate. Although blastocentesis remains a promising area for future research, several technical and methodological limitations are currently constraining its consideration for clinical practice.

Evolution of Minimally Invasive and Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing: An Overview.

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has become a common supplementary diagnοstic/testing tοol for in vitro fertilization (ΙVF) cycles due to a significant increase in cases of PGT fοr mοnogenic cοnditions (ΡGT-M) and de novο aneuplοidies (ΡGT-A) over the last ten years. This tendency is mostly attributable to the advancement and application of novel cytogenetic and molecular techniques in clinical practice that are capable of providing an efficient evaluation of the embryonic chromosomal complement and leading to better IVF/ICSI results. Although PGT is widely used, it requires invasive biopsy of the blastocyst, which may harm the embryo. Non-invasive approaches, like cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing, have lower risks but have drawbacks in consistency and sensitivity. This review discusses new developments and opportunities in the field of preimplantation genetic testing, enhancing the overall effectiveness and accessibility of preimplantation testing in the framework of developments in genomic sequencing, bioinformatics, and the integration of artificial intelligence in the interpretation of genetic data.

SCM is potential resource for non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing based on human embryos single-cell sequencing.

The ongoing development of assisted reproductive technologies has provided hope to individuals struggling with infertility, promising the potential for a healthy pregnancy. One significant innovation in field of pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) requires the biopsy of embryos or oocytes, which has potential implications for the health and development of the resultant offspring. Therefore, a non-invasive approach to preimplantation genetic screening is highly sought after. The clinical application of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (ni-PGT) is currently limited, with its sensitivity and specificity requiring further investigation. In this study, we used 218 human embryos for single-cell whole genome amplification (WGA), along with ni-PGT of blastocoele fluid (BF) and spent culture medium (SCM). Whole blastocyst (WB), trophectoderm biopsy (TB), and inner cell mass (ICM) from embryo biopsies were used as controls to track genomic signal alterations. Our results showed that the overall genome similarity between SCM and ICM was higher than that of BF. Apart from the Y chromosome, both SCM and ICM demonstrated numerous variant sites across other chromosomes.Further categorization of gene variants in these two sample types revealed that missense variants were the most prevalent, single nucleotide polymorphisms were more common than insertions or deletions, and C > T was the dominant single nucleotide variants in both ICM and SCM. Lastly, we found that the mutant genes in SCM and ICM had different biological functions and pathways. This study indicates that SCM provides a more effective source of embryonic DNA for preimplantation genetic screening, offering a novel reference point for genetic screening research.

Evaluation of non-invasive gene detection in preimplantation embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Genetic abnormalities in embryos are responsible for most miscarriages and repeated embryo implantation failures, so a reliable preimplantation genetic screening method is urgently needed. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT) is a potential method for embryo genetic diagnosis. However, the value of its application is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate and validate the diagnostic value of niPGT in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: This review used the "Preferred Reporting Items" as a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) statement. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library up to May 2022 to retrieve non-invasive preimplantation gene detection studies. The eligible research quality was evaluated following the quality assessment study-2 system for diagnostic accuracy. The pooled receiver operator characteristic curve (SROC) and the area under SROC (AUC) were used to evaluate diagnostic performance quantitatively. Threshold effect, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression analysis were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Deeks' funnel plots and sensitivity analyses were used to test the publication bias and stability of the meta-analysis, respectively. FINDINGS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.91), 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.92), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the spent culture medium (SCM) subgroup had higher sensitivity and lower specificity than the SCM combined with the blastocoel fluid (BF) subgroup. Subgroup analysis showed that the study sensitivity and specificity of < 100 cases were higher than those of ≥ 100. Heterogeneity (chi-square) analysis revealed that sample size might be a potential source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and Deeks' funnel plots indicated that our results were relatively robust and free from publication bias. INTERPRETATION: The present meta-analysis indicated that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of niPGT in preimplantation genetic testing were 0.84, 0.85, and 0.91, respectively. niPGT may have high detection accuracy and may serve as an alternative model for embryonic analysis. Additionally, by subgroup analysis, we found that BF did not improve the accuracy of niPGT in embryos. In the future, large-scale studies are needed to determine the detection value of niPGT.

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics?

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) encompasses methods that allow embryos to be tested for severe inherited conditions or for chromosome abnormalities, relevant to embryo health and viability. In order to obtain embryonic genetic material for analysis, a biopsy is required, involving the removal of one or more cells. This invasive procedure greatly increases the costs of PGT and there have been concerns that embryo viability could be compromised in some cases. The recent discovery of DNA within the blastocoele fluid (BF) of blastocysts and in spent embryo culture media (SCM) has led to interest in the development of non-invasive methods of PGT (niPGT). OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This review evaluates the current scientific evidence regarding non-invasive genetic assessment of preimplantation embryos. The success of different PGT methodologies in collecting and analysing extra-embryonic DNA is evaluated, and consideration is given to the potential biological and technical hindrances to obtaining a reliable clinical diagnosis. SEARCH METHODS: Original research and review papers concerning niPGT were sourced by searching PubMed and Google Scholar databases until July 2019. Searches comprised the keywords: 'non-invasive'; 'cell-free DNA'; 'blastocentesis'; 'blastocoel fluid'; 'spent culture media'; 'embryo culture medium'; 'preimplantation genetic testing'; 'preimplantation genetic diagnosis'; 'preimplantation genetic screening'; and 'aneuploidy'. OUTCOMES: Embryonic DNA is frequently detectable in BF and SCM of embryos produced during IVF treatment. Initial studies have achieved some success when performing cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis. However, in many cases, the efficiency has been restricted by technical complications associated with the low quantity and quality of the DNA. Reported levels of ploidy agreement between SCM/BF samples and biopsied embryonic cells vary widely. In some cases, a discrepancy with respect to cytogenetic data obtained after trophectoderm biopsy may be attributable to embryonic mosaicism or DNA contamination (usually of maternal origin). Some research indicates that aneuploid cells are preferentially eliminated from the embryo, suggesting that their DNA might be over-represented in SCM and BF samples; this hypothesis requires further investigation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Available data suggest that BF and SCM samples frequently provide DNA templates suitable for genetic analyses, offering a potential means of PGT that is less expensive than traditional methods, requires less micromanipulation skill and poses a lower risk to embryos. Critically, DNA isolation and amplification protocols must be optimised to reproducibly obtain an accurate clinical diagnosis, whilst minimising the impact of confounding factors such as contamination. Further investigations are required to understand the mechanisms underlying the release of embryonic DNA and to determine the extent to which this material reflects the true genetic status of the corresponding embryo. Currently, the clinic al potential of niPGT remains unknown.

The First ongoing Pregnancy Following Comprehensive Aneuploidy Assessment Using a Combined Blastocenetesis, Cell Free DNA and Trophectoderm Biopsy Strategy.

BACKGROUND: The exact origin of cell-free DNA found in spent culture media or blastocoel fluid is currently unknown but with the potential to become an improved source of DNA for chromosomal analysis than trophectoderm biopsy samples, it provides a superior representation of the fetal genetic status. However, the genetic material contained within the blastocoel cavity may be more reliable to assessment of embryo euploidy in a clinical context than trophectoderm of cell-free DNA. CASE PRESENTATION: This is the first UK case report where all three sources of DNA were analyzed in a clinical setting on 29 th January 2018 at the Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, leading to an ongoing clinical pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The experience from this case report suggests that removal of blastocoel fluid, sampling of spent culture media and trophectoderm biopsy can be carried out in parallel. Gathering genetic information from two to three independent samples of embryo DNA may provide enhanced diagnostic accuracy and may clarify cytogenetic status of mosaic embryos.

Diagnostic efficacy of blastocoel fluid and spent media as sources of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing in standard clinical conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether blastocoel fluid (BF) or spent blastocyst medium (SBM) is a suitable template for genotype and/or karyotype assessment of in vitro fertilization-generated embryos. DESIGN: Prospective blinded study. SETTING: Genetic laboratory. PATIENT(S): From 26 patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) treatments, 103 trophectoderms (TE), 92 BF samples, and 72 SBM samples. INTERVENTION(S): The BF and SBM were retrieved at the time of TE biopsy. Two DNA extraction strategies were evaluated on independent BF and SBM samples. Further enrolled samples were processed using next-generation sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for assessment of monogenic disorders (PGT-M) or aneuploidy (PGT-A). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): DNA amplification and concordance rates across BF, SBM, and TE to assess diagnostic efficiency. RESULT(S): No differences were detected among the DNA extraction methods tested. In PGT-M tests, for BF and SBM, 2.9% and 20.8% of all samples, respectively, produced a diagnosis concordant with the corresponding TE (n = 2 of 69 and 15 of 72, respectively). The SBM samples were associated with higher discordance rates and higher artifacts/contamination detection compared with BF. In multiple occasions, the maternal mutated variant was detected in the SBM of homozygous wild-type embryos, showing evidence of maternal DNA persistence in culture medium. In PGT-A tests, BF analysis showed high amplification failure rates (65.2%) and an overall concordance rate of 37.5% among amplified samples. CONCLUSION(S): Based on current methodologies, BF and SBM genetic analyses do not provide sufficiently reliable results to be employed clinically. Until the risk of maternal contamination can be properly prevented, SBM should not be used for PGT-M purposes.

Karyotype of the blastocoel fluid demonstrates low concordance with both trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the genomic profiles of blastocoel fluid (BF), inner cell mass (ICM), and trophectoderm (TE) cells derived from the same blastocyst. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Academic and in vitro fertilization units. PATIENT(S): Sixteen donated cryopreserved embryos at blastocyst stage. INTERVENTION(S): BF, TE, and ICM cells were retrieved from each blastocyst for chromosome analysis by means of next-generation sequencing (NGS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Aneuploidy screening and assessment of mosaicism in BF, TE and ICM samples with subsequent comparison of genomic profiles between the three blastocyst compartments. RESULT(S): Out of 16 blastocysts, 10 BF samples and 14 TE and ICM samples provided reliable NGS data for comprehensive chromosome analysis. Only 40.0% of BF-DNA karyotypes were fully concordant with TE or ICM, compared with 85.7% concordance between TE and ICM. In addition, BF-DNA was burdened with mosaic aneuploidies and the total number of affected chromosomes in BF was significantly higher compared with the TE and ICM. CONCLUSION(S): BF-DNA can be successfully amplified and subjected to NGS, but owing to increased discordance with ICM and TE, BF does not adequately represent the status of the rest of the embryo. To overcome biologic and technical challenges associated with BF sampling and processing, blastocentesis would require improvement in both laboratory protocols and aneuploidy calling algorithms. Therefore, TE biopsy remains the most effective way to predict embryonic karyotype, and the use of BF as a single source of DNA for preimplantation genetic screening is not yet advised.

Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium: evidence and potential clinical use.

The ability to screen embryos for aneuploidy or inherited disorders in a minimally invasive manner may represent a major advancement for the future of embryo viability assessment. Recent studies have demonstrated that both blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium contain genetic material, which can be isolated and subjected to downstream genetic analysis. The blastocoele fluid may represent an alternative source of nuclear DNA for aneuploidy testing, although the degree to which the isolated genetic material is solely representative of the developing embryo is currently unclear. In addition to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can be detected in the embryo culture medium. Currently, the origin of this nuclear and mtDNA has not been fully evaluated and there are several potential sources of contamination that may contribute to the genetic material detected in the culture medium. There is however evidence that the mtDNA content of the culture medium is related to embryo fragmentation levels and its presence is predictive of blastulation, indicating that embryo development may influence the levels of genetic material detected. If the levels of genetic material are strongly related to aspects of embryo quality, then this may be a novel biomarker of embryo viability. If the genetic material does have an embryo origin, the mechanisms by which DNA may be released into the blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium are unknown, although apoptosis may play a role. While the presence of this genetic material is an exciting discovery, the DNA in the blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium appears to be of low yield and integrity, which makes it challenging to study. Further research aimed at assessing the methodologies used for both isolating and analysing this genetic material, as well as tracing its origin, are needed in order to evaluate its potential for clinical use. Should such methodologies prove to be routinely successful and the DNA recovered demonstrated to be embryonic in origin, then they may be used in a minimally invasive and less technical methodology for genetic analysis and embryo viability assessment than those currently available.