Adult cardiopulmonary bypass in Australian and New Zealand public hospitals: A survey of practice.

A telephone survey of cardiac anaesthetists and perfusionists at the 29 public hospitals providing adult cardiac surgical services in Australia and New Zealand was carried out between December 2019 and January 2020. The aim was to investigate current practice with regard to selected contentious elements of anaesthetic and perfusion management during cardiopulmonary bypass; primarily relating to bypass circuit priming, blood conservation methods and point-of-care coagulation testing. There was a 100% response rate. The average number of adult public cardiopulmonary bypass cases per hospital was 508 (160-1400). For cardiopulmonary bypass cases, ten hospitals (34%) routinely used a cell saver and the remainder used a cell saver selectively. Residual blood remaining in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit was processed using a cell saver routinely in four hospitals (14%) and selectively in 23 (79%). Acute normovolaemic haemodilution was rarely used. Retrograde autologous priming was used routinely in seven hospitals (24%) and selectively in 16 (55%). All hospitals had access to point-of-care coagulation testing. The majority of hospitals targeted an activated clotting time of 480 s (range 400-500 s) prior to commencing cardiopulmonary bypass. There was marked geographic variation in access to fibrinogen concentrate. The cardiopulmonary bypass circuit prime solution was primarily a balanced crystalloid in most hospitals; however, there was significant variation regarding the addition of human albumin, mannitol, sodium bicarbonate and other medications. Many of the interventions examined were used on a case-by-case basis. These findings support the need for further research to define more evidence-based practice of these interventions.

Patient Blood Management for primary hip and knee replacement. A survey among POWER.2 study researchers. / Patient Blood Management en artroplastia primaria de cadera y rodilla. Encuesta entre los investigadores del estudio POWER.2.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of Patient Blood Management programs remain variable in Europe, and even in centres with well-established PBM programs variability exists in transfusion practices. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We conducted a survey in order to assess current practice in perioperative Patient Blood Management in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement among researchers involved in POWER.2 Study in Spain (an observational prospective study evaluating enhanced recovery pathways in orthopaedic surgery). RESULTS: A total of 322 responses were obtained (37.8%). Half of responders check Haemoglobin levels in patients at least 4 weeks before surgery; 35% treat all anaemic patients, although 99.7% consider detection and treatment of preoperative anaemia could influence the postoperative outcomes. Lack of infrastructure (76%) and lack of time (51%) are the main stated reasons not to treat anaemic patients. Iron status is routinely checked by 19% before surgery, and 36% evaluate it solely in the anaemic patient. Hb<9.9 g/dl is the threshold to delay surgery for 61% of clinicians, and 22% would consider transfusing preoperatively clinically stable patients without active bleeding. The threshold to transfuse patients without cardiovascular disease is 8 g/dl for 43%, and 7 g/dl for 34% of the responders; 75% of clinicians consider they use "restrictive thresholds", and 90% follow the single unit transfusion policy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our survey show variability in clinical practice in Patient Blood Management in major orthopaedic surgery, despite being the surgery with the greatest tradition in these programs.

Intraoperative cell salvage as part of a blood conservation strategy in an obstetric population with abnormal placentation at a large Irish tertiary referral centre: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhagic morbidity is more common in women with abnormal placentation, that is placenta praevia or morbidly adherent placenta. The incidence of abnormal placentation is increasing due to rising caesarean section rates. Concerns regarding blood safety, blood shortages and soaring costs of blood processing have generated growing enthusiasm for blood conservation strategies. The aim of our study was to look at intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) use and allogeneic transfusion patterns in patients with abnormal placentation. METHODS: Patients with abnormal placentation were identified from the hospital database over a 2-year period between 2015 and 2016. Information collected for those that had IOCS setup included estimated blood loss, volume of blood collected and returned, pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels and use of allogeneic blood. RESULTS: A total of 139 cases of abnormal placentation were identified. Abnormal placentation accounted for 62% of all cases of IOCS usage and was established for 53 patients with abnormal placentation. The re-transfusion rate was 18.5%. Five patients received IOCS blood only. The allogeneic transfusion rate was 7.5% in patients who had IOCS setup compared with 6.9% in those who did not (p = 1.00). Median blood loss was greater for patients who had IOCS blood returned compared with patients who had not (p = 0.004). The median volume of blood returned was 520 (114-608) mL. Preoperative haemoglobin levels were lower for patients who received a combination of cell salvage and allogeneic blood (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: IOCS contributed to a reduction or elimination of allogeneic transfusion for a proportion of this high-risk cohort and should be an integral component of a hospitals' blood conservation strategy.

Pilares del ahorro transfusional / Pillars in the blood conservation

Las transfusiones sanguíneas alogénicas han tenido un rol central en el desarrollo de la medicina, principalmente como terapia de soporte en pacientes críticos, cirugía mayor, trauma y trastornos hematopoyéticos. Sin embargo, su utilización no está exenta de importantes efectos adversos y de altos costos asociados. Además, los productos sanguíneos son un recurso limitado que no debe ser desperdiciado. Por otro lado, la cirugía en pacientes que rehúsan la utilización de hemoderivados ha mostrado igual o mejores resultados que los pacientes que aceptan transfusiones. Esto ha llevado a buscar un manejo apropiado de la sangre en todos nuestros pacientes, evitando los riesgos y costos innecesarios de las transfusiones, pero permitiéndolos cuando se cree que los beneficios serán mayores que los riesgos. En este trabajo se presentan 3 pilares esenciales. El primero es el diagnóstico y manejo apropiado de la anemia preoperatoria, disminuyendo los riesgos perioperatorios, ya que la anemia por sí sola es un factor de morbimortalidad. El segundo pilar está constituido por diversas técnicas, que están disponibles en la actualidad, para minimizar el sangrado perioperatorio. Finalmente, el tercer pilar es mejorar la tolerancia a la anemia. El uso en conjunto de diversas técnicas descritas en este trabajo ha mostrado ser efectivo en disminuir el sangrado perioperatorio, la necesidad de transfusiones alogénicas y las unidades de sangre utilizadas, lo cual podría permitir mejores resultados clínicos en nuestros pacientes.

Allogeneic blood transfusions have played a central role in the development of medicine, mainly as a support therapy in critically ill patients, major surgery, trauma and hematopoietic disorders. However, their use is not without significant adverse effects and associated high costs. Moreover, blood products are a limited resource that should not be wasted. Furthermore, surgery in patients who refuse the use of blood products has shown equal or better results than patients who accept transfusions. This has led to seek an appropriate blood management in all our patients, avoiding unnecessary costs and risks of transfusions, but allowing them when they believe the benefits outweigh the risks. In this paper three essential pillars are presented. The first is the appropriate diagnosis and management of pre-operative anaemia decreasing perioperative risk, since anaemia itself is a factor of morbidity and mortality. The second pillar is formed by various techniques that are available today to minimize bleeding perioperative. Finally, the third pillar is to improve tolerance to anaemia. The joint use of various techniques described in this paper has proven effective in decreasing perioperative bleeding, the need for allogeneic transfusions and blood units used, which may allow better clinical outcomes in our patients.

'True Blood' The Critical Care Story: An audit of blood sampling practice across three adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care settings.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is common in critically ill patients, and has a significant negative impact on patients' recovery. Blood conservation strategies have been developed to reduce the incidence of iatrogenic anaemic caused by sampling for diagnostic testing. OBJECTIVES: Describe practice and local guidelines in adult, paediatric and neonatal Australian intensive care units (ICUs) regarding blood sampling and conservation strategies. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study, conducted July 2013 over one week in single adult, paediatric and neonatal ICUs in Brisbane. Data were collected on diagnostic blood samples obtained during the study period, including demographic and acuity data of patients. Institutional blood conservation practice and guidelines were compared against seven evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 940 blood sampling episodes from 96 patients were examined across three sites. Arterial blood gas was the predominant reason for blood sampling in each unit, accounting for 82% of adult, 80% of paediatric and 47% of neonatal samples taken (p<0.001). Adult patients had significantly more median [IQR] samples per day in comparison to paediatrics and neonates (adults 5.0 [2.4]; paediatrics 2.3 [2.9]; neonatal 0.7 [2.7]), which significantly increased median [IQR] blood sampling costs per day (adults AUD$101.11 [54.71]; paediatrics AUD$41.55 [56.74]; neonatal AUD$8.13 [14.95]; p<0.001). The total volume of samples per day (median [IQR]) was also highest in adults (adults 22.3mL [16.8]; paediatrics 5.0mL [1.0]; neonates 0.16mL [0.4]). There was little information about blood conservation strategies in the local clinical practice guidelines, with the adult and neonatal sites including none of the seven recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant variation in blood sampling practice and conservation strategies between critical care settings. This has implications not only for anaemia but also infection control and healthcare costs.