RESUMO
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive cognitive and functional decline. Nearly all patients with AD develop neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs). Agitation is one of the most distressing and challenging NPS. Brexpiprazole is an oral antipsychotic and is the first approved pharmacologic agent in the United States for the treatment of agitation associated with dementia due to AD. Its effect is thought to be from its partial serotonin 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptor agonist activity and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonism. Brexpiprazole is a maintenance medication, and it should not be used "as needed" or as a "PRN" treatment for breakthrough agitation. Brexpiprazole is a major substrate of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Dose adjustments may be required for drug interactions or impaired renal or hepatic function. Clinical trials found brexpiprazole 2 to 3 mg/d demonstrated significant improvements in agitation, with brexpiprazole showing an approximate 5-point greater reduction on change in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory total score at week 12 from baseline compared with placebo. Brexpiprazole is generally well tolerated and safe, and common adverse reactions when used for this indication include dizziness, headaches, insomnia, nasopharyngitis, somnolence, and urinary tract infections. Like other antipsychotics used for agitation in AD, brexpiprazole is associated with higher mortality rates compared with placebo. In a long-term care setting, there are several considerations for its use. Benefits include an oral agent that is well tolerated and clinical data showing statistically significant effects on agitation. However, brexpiprazole has not been studied in head-to-head clinical trials against other antipsychotics, and there are differing opinions if the agitation score reductions translate to a clinically meaningful difference. The approval of brexpiprazole signals favorably for upcoming agents for this indication, including escitalopram and dextromethorphan-bupropion. Both escitalopram and dextromethorphan-bupropion are currently undergoing clinical trials.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Bupropion is an atypical antidepressant that shows robust efficacy in the regulation of neuropathic pain. Citicoline is a dietary supplement which is used as a neuroprotective agent for central nervous system (CNS) disorders. The probable interaction between bupropion and citicoline on neuropathic pain was assessed in male mice. METHODS: Neuropathic pain was induced by sciatic nerve ligation. Neuropathic pain was examined in nerve-ligated mice using tail-flick and hot-plate tests. RESULTS: The results indicated that intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of citicoline (50 and 100 mg/kg) induced an anti-nociceptive effect in nerve-ligated animals. Similarly, i.p. injection of bupropion (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) induced anti-nociceptive effects in nerve-ligated mice. Co-administration of different doses of bupropion (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) along with a low dose of citicoline (25 mg/kg) caused an anti-nociceptive effect by enhancement of tail-flick and hot plate latencies. Interestingly, there is an additive effect between bupropion and citicoline upon the induction of the anti-nociceptive effect. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is an interaction between bupropion and citicoline upon induction of an anti-nociceptive effect in nerve-ligated mice.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common mental health disorder marked by sadness, hopelessness, and anhedonia. Various therapies exist, but their effectiveness is limited. Dextromethorphan hydrobromide combined with bupropion hydrochloride (Auvelity®) is a recently approved alternative for treating this condition in adults. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the neurobiology of major depression and delves into the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dextromethorphan plus bupropion in adult patients. It is based on observational studies, clinical trials, and other secondary studies obtained through systematic literature searches. EXPERT OPINION: The combination of bupropion and dextromethorphan as a new pharmacotherapy for mental health is an interesting addition to the treatment options that can be used for MDD. The combination can be used in a range of scenarios, including as a first line therapy, as a second option when a patient has failed to achieve remission with a serotonin targeting agent, and for treatment resistant depression. Further research for other indications, including addiction disorders, may provide exciting results. Although a new combination, clinicians will be very familiar with both agents, increasing their acceptability. This pharmacotherapy also may bring increased impetus for discovering other combinations that may have beneficial synergistic effects.
Assuntos
Bupropiona , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Dextrometorfano , Humanos , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Bupropiona/farmacologia , Dextrometorfano/uso terapêutico , Dextrometorfano/farmacologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/uso terapêutico , Combinação de MedicamentosRESUMO
Background: Rare genetic obesity commonly features early-onset obesity, hyperphagia, and therapy-resistance to lifestyle interventions. Pharmacotherapy is often required to treat hyperphagia and induce weight loss. We describe clinical outcomes of glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide or naltrexone-bupropion treatment in adults with molecularly confirmed genetic obesity (MCGO) or highly suspected for genetic obesity without definite diagnosis (HSGO). Methods: We conducted a real-world cohort study at the Obesity Center CGG at Erasmus University Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, between March 19, 2019, and August 14, 2023. All patients with MCGO and HSGO who were treated with either liraglutide or naltrexone-bupropion were included. Liraglutide 3 mg and naltrexone-bupropion were administered according to the manufacturer's protocol. Treatment evaluation occurred short-term, after 12 weeks on maximum or highest-tolerated dose, preceded by the 4-5 week dose escalation phase. Differences in anthropometrics, body composition, metabolic markers, self-reported appetite, eating behaviour, and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated. Findings: Ninety-eight adults were included in the analysis: 23 patients with MCGO and 75 patients with HSGO, with median BMI of 42.0 kg/m2 (IQR 38.7-48.2) and 43.7 kg/m2 (IQR 38.0-48.7), respectively. After liraglutide treatment, median weight at evaluation significantly decreased compared to baseline in both groups: -4.7% (IQR -6.0 to -1.5) in patients with MCGO and -5.2% (IQR -8.1 to -3.5) in patients with HSGO. Additionally, improvements were observed in appetite, fat mass, fasting glucose, and HbA1c in both patients with MCGO and with HSGO. Patients with HSGO also reported significant improvements in several domains of QoL and eating behaviour. In patients with MCGO and HSGO treated with naltrexone-bupropion, mean weight at evaluation significantly differed from baseline: -5.2% ± 5.8 in patients with MCGO and -4.4% ± 4.7 in patients with HSGO. Appetite, fat mass, and waist circumference significantly decreased in both groups. Obesity-related comorbidities improved in significant proportions of patients treated with liraglutide or naltrexone-bupropion. Interpretation: In conclusion, our short-term findings show potential of liraglutide and naltrexone-bupropion as treatment options for adults with (a clinical phenotype of) genetic obesity. Funding: MB, EvdA, and EvR are supported by the Elisabeth Foundation, a non-profit foundation supporting academic obesity research.
RESUMO
Gaming disorder is a growing concern, recognized by the World Health Organization and included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) as internet gaming disorder (IGD) for further study. This case report describes a 13-year-old boy diagnosed with IGD according to the proposed DSM-5 criteria. The patient exhibited excessive gaming behavior leading to impaired academic performance and social interaction. Treatment included medication with bupropion and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) resulting in significant improvement in gaming habits and social functioning. This case highlights the effectiveness of a combined approach for managing IGD and emphasizes the need for further research to optimize treatment strategies.
RESUMO
Introduction and importance: Chest pain is one of the most prevalent complaints amongst individuals presenting in healthcare settings, encompassing a broad spectrum of etiologies. Work-up for chest pain often focuses on excluding life-threatening conditions before the consideration of atypical causes. Case presentation: A 47-year-old male with a past medical history of tobacco use and depression presented with persistent left-sided chest pain. Vitals on arrival were notable for mild hypertension. Two consecutive high-sensitivity troponins were unremarkable. The electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm with no ischemic changes. Due to the atypical presentation of chest pain, the patient's home medications were reviewed, and his bupropion was discontinued due to concern for medication-induced chest pain. The patient was discharged and presented 2 days for follow-up endorsing complete resolution of his chest pain. Clinical discussion: Prior investigations have shown bupropion to be associated with chest pain, with resolution noted after discontinuation. The etiology of chest pain is likely sympathomimetic, as bupropion has been shown to exhibit positive inotropic effects on myocardial tissue, propagated by catecholamine release. Conclusion: Patients taking bupropion may present with atypical chest pain. Medication discontinuation may be beneficial in alleviating symptoms.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Stimulants, including methylphenidate and amphetamines, are the first-line pharmacological treatment of ADHD in adults. However, in patients who do not respond or poorly tolerate stimulants, non-stimulant medications are usually recommended. AREAS COVERED: The authors provide a narrative review of the literature on non-stimulant treatments for adult ADHD, including controlled and observational clinical studies conducted on adult samples. Atomoxetine has been extensively studied and showed significant efficacy in treating adult ADHD. Issues related to dosing, treatment duration, safety, and use in the case of psychiatric comorbidity are summarized. Among other compounds indicated for ADHD in adults, antidepressants sharing at least a noradrenergic or dopaminergic component, including tricyclic compounds, bupropion, and viloxazine, have shown demonstratable efficacy. Evidence is also available for antihypertensives, particularly guanfacine, as well as memantine, metadoxine, and mood stabilizers, while negative findings have emerged for galantamine, antipsychotics, and cannabinoids. EXPERT OPINION: While according to clinical guidelines, atomoxetine may serve as the only second-line option in adults with ADHD, several other nonstimulant compounds may be effectively used in order to personalize treatment based on comorbid conditions and ADHD features. Nevertheless, further research is needed to identify and test more personalized treatment strategies for adults with ADHD.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Humanos , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Cloridrato de Atomoxetina/uso terapêutico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Bupropion is an antidepressant used in the treatment of major depressive disorder, seasonal affective disorder, nicotine addiction, and weight loss. It primarily functions via norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibition. At toxic doses, bupropion can elicit seizures, as well as precipitate corrected QT interval (QTc) and QRS prolongation. We describe a case of an 18-year-old female who reportedly ingested 28 grams of extended-release bupropion, a dose much higher than in previously reported cases. Toxic ingestion precipitated status epilepticus, prolonged QTc, widened QRS, pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT), and subsequent cardiovascular collapse necessitating veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and Impella support. Historically, the cardiotoxic effects of bupropion toxicity have largely been treated with supportive care, sometimes requiring ECMO. This patient's course was complicated by a widening QRS despite aggressive bicarbonate therapy and recurrent pVT, which was ultimately aborted with lidocaine. Neurological prognostication was further complicated by a lack of brainstem reflexes on the exam. With maximal supportive care, the patient was liberated from Impella, ECMO, and the ventilator by hospital day seven. At discharge, she was neurologically intact with full recovery of cardiac function. This case emphasizes the need for early consideration of transfer to an ECMO center in the setting of a bupropion overdose and offers a potentially effective treatment option for bupropion-induced ventricular arrhythmia.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A 12-week placebo-controlled, sequential parallel Accelerated Development of Additive Pharmacotherapy Treatment for Methamphetamine Use Disorder (ADAPT-2) trial evaluated the effects of extended-release injectable naltrexone plus extended-release oral bupropion (NTX + BUPN) on methamphetamine (MA) use over two stages. This study reports on the previously unpublished stage 2 MA use in participants randomized at stage 1 to receive NTX + BUPN through both stages compared with those assigned to placebo. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) ADAPT-2 network trial. SETTING: The parent ADAPT-2 trial was carried out across multiple NIDA Clinical Trials Network (CTN) sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: This analysis includes 403 people with MA use disorder who participated in the ADAPT-2 CTN trial. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: NTX + BUPN was compared with placebo over the course of the trial. MEASUREMENT: MA use was measured by urine drug screens conducted twice weekly for 12 weeks, then once in week 13 and once in week 16 post-treatment follow-up. FINDINGS: Participants on NTX + BUPN in stage 1 showed an additional 9.2% increase [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09%-17.9%, P = 0.038] during stage 2 in their probability of testing negative for MA, with a total increase of 27.1% (95% CI, 13.2%-41.1%, P < 0.001) over the full 12 weeks of treatment. In contrast, participants on placebo in both stages increased in probability of testing MA-negative by a total of 11.4% (95% CI, 4.1%-18.6%, P = 0.002) over all 12 weeks. The 12-week increase among participants on NTX + BUPN was significantly greater-by 15.8% (95% CI, 4.5%-27.0%, P = 0.006)-than the increase among those on placebo. CONCLUSION: For people with methamphetamine (MA) use disorder receiving treatment with extended-release injectable naltrexone plus extended-release oral bupropion (NTX + BUPN), continued treatment with NTX + BUPN after 6 weeks is associated with additional reductions in MA use up to 12 weeks.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Bupropion toxicity can lead to adverse cardiovascular events (ACVE), but delayed onset of toxicity makes risk stratification difficult. This study aimed to validate previously defined predictors of ACVE and identify novel predictors among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) after bupropion overdose. METHODS: This secondary analysis of prospective data from the Toxicology Investigators Consortium Core Registry analyzed adult acute or acute-on-chronic bupropion exposures from 2015 to 2018. The primary outcome was ACVE (any of the following: myocardial injury, shock, ventricular dysrhythmia, or cardiac arrest). Potential predictors of ACVE included previously derived predictors in the overall drug overdose population (prior cardiac disease, initial serum bicarbonate < 20 mEq/L, and initial QTc ≥ 500 ms), exposure circumstances, and initial serum lactate value. Candidate predictors were evaluated using univariate analysis and multivariable regression modeling. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to derive optimal cutoff points for novel predictors, and prognostic test characteristics were calculated. RESULTS: Of 355 patients analyzed, ACVE occurred in 34 (9.6%) patients. Initial serum bicarbonate < 20 mEq/L (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.94-10.0) and initial QTc ≥ 500 ms (aOR 2.52, 95% CI 1.01-6.09) independently predicted ACVE. Exposure circumstances did not predict ACVE. Initial serum lactate > 5.2 mmol/L independently predicted ACVE (aOR 12.2, 95% CI 2.50-75.2) and was 90.7% specific with 80.3% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic acidosis and QTc prolongation were validated as predictors of ACVE in ED patients with bupropion overdose. Serum lactate elevation was strongly predictive of ACVE in this study and warrants further investigation.
RESUMO
Background and aims: Several pharmacological interventions, such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline, and bupropion, have been approved for clinical use of smoking cessation. E-cigarettes (EC) are increasingly explored by many RCTs for their potentiality in smoking cessation. In addition, some RCTs are attempting to explore new drugs for smoking cessation, such as cytisine. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to investigate how these drugs and e-cigarettes compare regarding their efficacy and acceptability. Materials and methods: This systematic review and NMA searched all clinical studies on smoking cessation using pharmacological monotherapies or e-cigarettes published from January 2011 to May 2022 using MEDLINE, COCHRANE Library, and PsychINFO databases. NRTs were divided into transdermal (TDN) and oronasal nicotine (ONN) by administrative routes, thus 7 network nodes were set up for direct and indirect comparison. Two different indicators measured the efficacy: prevalent and continuous smoking abstinence. The drop-out rates measured the acceptability. Results: The final 40 clinical studies included in this study comprised 77 study cohorts and 25,889 participants. Varenicline is more effective intervention to assist in smoking cessation during 16-32 weeks follow-up, and is very likely to prompt dropout. Cytisine shows more effectiveness in continuous smoking cessation but may also lead to dropout. E-cigarettes and oronasal nicotine are more effective than no treatment in encouraging prevalent abstinence, but least likely to prompt dropout. Finally, transdermal nicotine delivery is more effective than no treatment in continuous abstinence, with neither significant effect on prevalent abstinence nor dropout rate. Conclusion: This review suggested and agreed that Varenicline, Cytisine and transdermal nicotine delivery, as smoking cessation intervention, have advantages and disadvantages. However, we had to have reservations about e-cigarettes as a way to quit smoking in adolescents.
Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Metanálise em Rede , Agentes de Cessação do Hábito de Fumar , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Vareniclina , Humanos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Agentes de Cessação do Hábito de Fumar/uso terapêutico , Alcaloides/uso terapêutico , Azocinas/uso terapêutico , Azocinas/administração & dosagem , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Quinolizinas/uso terapêutico , Nicotina/administração & dosagem , Alcaloides QuinolizidínicosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bupropion is a popular antidepressant due to its favorable side effect profile and indications for smoking cessation and weight loss. Due to the possibility of delayed onset seizure and other adverse outcomes after bupropion overdose, patients are often observed for periods of 12-24 hours following suspected ingestion. Tachycardia is a clinical predictor that holds promise in differentiating cases at risk for seizures from low-risk cases that do not require prolonged observation. This study assessed whether heart rate within the first eight hours of presentation can identify cases that do not require extended observation. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all supra-therapeutic bupropion cases from two hospital systems between 2010 and 2022. RESULTS: Data from 216 charts were included. Seizures, hypotension, and dysrhythmias occurred in 19 percent (n = 41), 1.4 percent (n = 3), 0.9 percent (n = 2) respectively. One patient died. Delayed adverse effects were rare (n = 4); they occurred from 14 hours to 28 hours post-ingestion. Maximum heart rate in eight hours was associated with a risk of adverse outcomes. (odds ratio, 1.07; 95 percent confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.09; P < 0.001). An eight hour maximum heart rate threshold of 104 beats/minute had a negative predictive value of 100 percent (95 percent confidence interval: 96.7 percent to 100 percent) for the occurrence of delayed adverse effects. All patients with delayed effects had tachycardia within five hours of emergency department arrival. DISCUSSION: Delayed adverse outcomes of seizures, hypotension, dysrhythmia, and death were uncommon in this cohort. Heart rate during the first eight hours of observation performs reliably as a screening test to identify patients at low risk for delayed adverse outcomes. This study is limited by its retrospective nature, the inability to ascertain time of ingestion for most cases and the lack of confirmatory laboratory testing. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of an eight hour observation period when there are no other clinical signs of toxicity to warrant admission and if no co-ingestion or administration of substances that mask tachycardia are present.
Assuntos
Bupropiona , Overdose de Drogas , Frequência Cardíaca , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Convulsões , Humanos , Bupropiona/intoxicação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Overdose de Drogas/diagnóstico , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Convulsões/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Taquicardia/induzido quimicamente , Taquicardia/fisiopatologia , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/intoxicação , AdolescenteRESUMO
AIM: To investigate growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) levels in response to antiobesity medications, namely, liraglutide (Lira) and naltrexone/bupropion (N/B), in individuals with overweight or obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized clinical trial with a two-arm, parallel design. A total of 42 individuals with overweight or obesity without type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled. The participants received either Lira 3 mg or N/B 32/360 mg, along with diet and exercise, according to comorbidities, cost and method of administration. Participants underwent clinical and laboratory measurements at baseline, as well as at the 3- and 6-month time points. Anthropometric measurements and body composition analysis via bioelectrical impendence analysis were performed. Total blood samples for GDF-15 and H-specific GDF-15 were collected in the fasting state and every 30 min for 3 h after the consumption of a standardized mixed meal. RESULTS: Overall, participants' weight was reduced by 9.29 ± 5.34 kg at Month 3 and 11.52 ± 7.52 kg at Month 6. Total and H-specific GDF-15 levels did not show significant changes during the mixed meal compared to values before the meal when all participants were examined at baseline, and at 3 and 6 month follow-ups. No statistical significance was found when participants were examined by subgroup (Lira vs. N/B). No significant differences between treatment groups in postprandial area under the curve (AUC) or incremental AUC values were found at baseline or in the follow-up months with regard to total and H-specific GDF-15 levels. CONCLUSION: Neither total nor H-specific GDF-15 levels are affected by Lira or N/B treatment in patients with overweight or obesity.
Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade , Bupropiona , Fator 15 de Diferenciação de Crescimento , Liraglutida , Naltrexona , Obesidade , Humanos , Liraglutida/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Fator 15 de Diferenciação de Crescimento/sangue , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Bupropiona/administração & dosagem , Naltrexona/uso terapêutico , Naltrexona/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/sangue , Adulto , Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Antiobesidade/administração & dosagem , Sobrepeso , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Período Pós-PrandialRESUMO
Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a simple, accurate, and precise method for the estimation of bupropion and dextromethorphan in a fixed-dose combination of tablets and robust high-performance liquid chromatography for assay analysis of such a fixed combination. Materials and Methods: Chromatographic analysis was performed and separations were achieved on a Denali C18 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 micron using a mobile phase composition of ortho-phosphoric acid and acetonitrile in the ratio of 600:400 (v/v), flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, injection volume is 10 µL and run time of 6 min in isocratic elution. Ultraviolet (UV) detection was performed at a wavelength of 221 nm. The temperature was maintained at 30 °C. Well-resolved peaks were observed with a high number of theoretical plates, lower tailing factor, and reproducible relative retention time. The method was validated, and all validation parameters were found to be within the acceptance limits. Results: A simple, accurate, and precise method has been developed for estimating bupropion and dextromethorphan in a fixed dose combination of tablets. The optimized method included the following parameters: column temperature of 30 °C, 40% acetonitrile as the mobile phase, and flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Retention times were 2.25 min and 3.12 min for bupropion and dextromethorphan, respectively. The method was found to be linear in the range of 17.5-105 µg/mL [for R2 < 0.999) and 7.5-45 µg/mL (for R2 > 0.999] for bupropion and dextromethorphan, respectively. Both active pharmaceutical ingredients dissolved more than 90% within 5 min. Conclusion: The current study describes a new, simple, reliable, and economical elution reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography method for estimating bupropion and dextromethorphan in a fixed combination tablet dosage form. The forced degradation studies were conducted using several degradation conditions such as acidic, alkali, oxidation, thermal, UV, and neutral conditions; the proposed method was effectively employed from the resolution of sample peaks. To the best of our knowledge, no such detailed and stability-indicating method has been reported for a fixed tablet dosage form.
RESUMO
Psychotic depression (PD) is a severe mental disorder leading to functional disability and high risk of suicide, but very little is known about the comparative effectiveness of medications used in its maintenance treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the comparative effectiveness of specific antipsychotics and antidepressants, and their combinations, on the risk of psychiatric hospitalization among persons with PD in routine care. Persons aged 16-65 years with a first-time diagnosis of PD were identified from Finnish (years 2000-2018) and Swedish (years 2006-2021) nationwide registers of inpatient care, specialized outpatient care, sickness absence, and disability pension. The main exposures were specific antipsychotics and antidepressants, and the main outcome measure was psychiatric hospitalization as a marker of severe relapse. The risk of hospitalization associated with periods of use vs. non-use of medications (expressed as adjusted hazard ratio, aHR) was assessed by a within-individual design, using each individual as his/her own control, and analyzed with stratified Cox models. The two national cohorts were first analyzed separately, and then combined using a fixed-effect meta-analysis. The Finnish cohort included 19,330 persons (mean age: 39.8±14.7 years; 57.9% women) and the Swedish cohort 13,684 persons (mean age: 41.3±14.0 years; 53.5% women). Individual antidepressants associated with a decreased risk of relapse vs. non-use of antidepressants were bupropion (aHR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.85), vortioxetine (aHR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.63-0.96) and venlafaxine (aHR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98). Any long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) (aHR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.80) and clozapine (aHR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.91) were associated with a decreased risk of relapse vs. non-use of antipsychotics. Among monotherapies, only vortioxetine (aHR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95) and bupropion (aHR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.89) were associated with a significantly decreased risk of relapse vs. non-use of both antidepressants and antipsychotics. In an exploratory analysis of antidepressant-antipsychotic combinations, a decreased relapse risk was found for amitriptyline-olanzapine (aHR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.28-0.71), sertraline-quetiapine (aHR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.93) and venlafaxine-quetiapine (aHR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91) vs. non-use of antidepressants and antipsychotics. Benzodiazepines and related drugs (aHR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.24-1.34) and mirtazapine (aHR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29) were associated with an increased risk of relapse. These data indicate that, in the maintenance treatment of PD, bupropion, vortioxetine, venlafaxine, any LAI, clozapine, and only few specific antidepressant-antipsychotic combinations are associated with a decreased risk of relapse. These findings challenge the current recommendation by treatment guidelines to combine an antipsychotic with an antidepressant (without further specification) as standard treatment in PD.
RESUMO
AIM: This guideline (GL) is aimed at providing a clinical practice reference for the management of adult patients with overweight or obesity associated with metabolic complications who are resistant to lifestyle modification. METHODS: Surgeons, endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, psychologists, pharmacologists, a general practitioner, a nutritionist, a nurse and a patients' representative acted as multi-disciplinary panel. This GL has been developed following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed by a methodologic group. For each question, the panel identified potentially relevant outcomes, which were then rated for their impact on therapeutic choices. Only outcomes classified as "critical" and "important" were considered in the systematic review of evidence. Those classified as "critical" were considered for clinical practice recommendations. Consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations was reached through a majority vote. RESULTS: The present GL provides recommendations about the role of both pharmacological and surgical treatment for the clinical management of the adult patient population with BMI > 27 kg/m2 and < 40 kg/m2 associated with weight-related metabolic comorbidities, resistant to lifestyle changes. The panel: suggests the timely implementation of therapeutic interventions in addition to diet and physical activity; recommends the use of semaglutide 2.4 mg/week and suggests liraglutide 3 mg/day in patients with obesity or overweight also affected by diabetes or pre-diabetes; recommends semaglutide 2.4 mg/week in patients with obesity or overweight also affected by non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; recommends semaglutide 2.4 mg/week as first-line drug in patients with obesity or overweight that require a larger weight loss to reduce comorbidities; suggests the use of orlistat in patients with obesity or overweight also affected by hypertriglyceridemia that assume high-calorie and high-fat diet; suggests the use of naltrexone/bupropion combination in patients with obesity or overweight, with emotional eating; recommends surgical intervention (sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or metabolic gastric bypass/gastric bypass with single anastomosis/gastric mini bypass in patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 who are suitable for metabolic surgery; and suggests gastric banding as a possible, though less effective, surgical alternative. CONCLUSION: The present GL is directed to all physicians addressing people with obesity-working in hospitals, territorial services or private practice-and to general practitioners and patients. The recommendations should also consider the patient's preferences and the available resources and expertise.
Assuntos
Obesidade , Sobrepeso , Humanos , Obesidade/terapia , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Sobrepeso/terapia , Sobrepeso/complicações , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Adulto , Itália/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Terapia Comportamental/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Gerenciamento Clínico , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodosRESUMO
This is a case of a 20-year-old pregnant female presenting EKG abnormalities associated with an overdose of bupropion. These ECG abnormalities are prolongation of the QRS, prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc), right axis deviation, and a terminal R wave. The propagation of electricity through the myocardium is dependent on many factors. It is dependent on the flow of sodium from the extracellular to intracellular space, flow of potassium from intracellular to extracellular space, and ultimately the propagation of the signal at the gap junction by Connexin 43 (Cx-43). We postulate that the ECG abnormalities in this case are secondary to bupropion's effect on the potassium rectifier channels (Kir) and or Cx-43 at the gap junction.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation is the best strategy for reducing tobacco-related morbimortality. The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to test whether using the genetically favorable markers to choose a smoking cessation drug treatment (precision medicine) was superior to using the most effective drug (varenicline) in terms of abstinence rates. Additionally, combination therapy was tested when monotherapy failed. METHODS: This partially blind, single-center study randomized (1:1) 361 participants into two major groups. In the genetic group (n=184), CYP2B6 rs2279343 (genotype AA) participants started treatment with bupropion, and CHRNA4 rs1044396 (genotype CT or TT) participants started treatment with varenicline; when genetic favorable to both, participants started treatment with bupropion, and when favorable to neither, on both drugs. In the control group (n=177), participants started treatment with varenicline, regardless of genetic markers. Drug treatment lasted 12 weeks. Efficacy endpoints were abstinence rates at Weeks 4, and Weeks 8-12, biochemically validated by carbon monoxide in exhaled air. Participants who did not achieve complete abstinence at Week 4, regardless of group, were given the choice to receive combination therapy. RESULTS: Abstinence rates were 42.9% (95% CI: 36-64) in the control group versus 30.4% (95% CI: 23-37) in the genetic group at Week 4 (p=0.01); and 74% (95% CI: 67-80) versus 52% (95% CI: 49-64) at Week 12 (p<0.001), respectively. The strategy of combining drugs after Week 4 increased abstinence rates in both groups and the significant difference between genetic and control groups was maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that using these selected genetic markers was inferior to starting treatment with varenicline (control group), which is currently the most effective smoking cessation drug; moreover, the addition of bupropion in cases of varenicline monotherapy failure improves the efficacy rate until the end of treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT03362099.