The longitudinal characterization of immune responses in COVID-19 patients reveals novel prognostic signatures for disease severity, patients' survival and long COVID.

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still poses a significant burden on global health and economy, especially for symptoms persisting beyond the acute disease. COVID-19 manifests with various degrees of severity and the identification of early biomarkers capable of stratifying patient based on risk of progression could allow tailored treatments. Methods: We longitudinally analyzed 67 patients, classified according to a WHO ordinal scale as having Mild, Moderate, or Severe COVID-19. Peripheral blood samples were prospectively collected at hospital admission and during a 6-month follow-up after discharge. Several subsets and markers of the innate and adaptive immunity were monitored as putative factors associated with COVID-19 symptoms. Results: More than 50 immunological parameters were associated with disease severity. A decision tree including the main clinical, laboratory, and biological variables at admission identified low NK-cell precursors and CD14+CD91+ monocytes, and high CD8+ Effector Memory T cell frequencies as the most robust immunological correlates of COVID-19 severity and reduced survival. Moreover, low regulatory B-cell frequency at one month was associated with the susceptibility to develop long COVID at six months, likely due to their immunomodulatory ability. Discussion: These results highlight the profound perturbation of the immune response during COVID-19. The evaluation of specific innate and adaptive immune-cell subsets allows to distinguish between different acute and persistent COVID-19 symptoms.

Gut microbiome dynamics and predictive value in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a comparative analysis of shallow and deep shotgun sequencing.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has led to a wide range of clinical presentations, with respiratory symptoms being common. However, emerging evidence suggests that the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is also affected, with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, a key receptor for SARS-CoV-2, abundantly expressed in the ileum and colon. The virus has been detected in GI tissues and fecal samples, even in cases with negative results of the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in the respiratory tract. GI symptoms have been associated with an increased risk of ICU admission and mortality. The gut microbiome, a complex ecosystem of around 40 trillion bacteria, plays a crucial role in immunological and metabolic pathways. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, characterized by a loss of beneficial microbes and decreased microbial diversity, has been observed in COVID-19 patients, potentially contributing to disease severity. We conducted a comprehensive gut microbiome study in 204 hospitalized COVID-19 patients using both shallow and deep shotgun sequencing methods. We aimed to track microbiota composition changes induced by hospitalization, link these alterations to clinical procedures (antibiotics administration) and outcomes (ICU referral, survival), and assess the predictive potential of the gut microbiome for COVID-19 prognosis. Shallow shotgun sequencing was evaluated as a cost-effective diagnostic alternative for clinical settings. Our study demonstrated the diverse effects of various combinations of clinical parameters, microbiome profiles, and patient metadata on the precision of outcome prognostication in patients. It indicates that microbiological data possesses greater reliability in forecasting patient outcomes when contrasted with clinical data or metadata. Furthermore, we established that shallow shotgun sequencing presents a viable and cost-effective diagnostic alternative to deep sequencing within clinical environments.

Prevalence of cutaneous manifestations and myositis-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients and Anti-PL7 antibodies association with pulmonary radiological severity: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic immune-mediated myopathy, and may involve many organs, including muscles, skin and lungs. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are a useful aid in diagnosis DM and identifying its clinical subtype. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies found clinical similarities regarding lung involvement in both COVID-19 and DM. Such similarities have prompted speculation of a common pathogenetic mechanism. Indeed, viral infections are well-known triggers of autoimmune diseases. This prompted us to investigate whether circulating MSAs could be markers of the severity of lung involvement and of clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, we investigated the presence of cutaneous signs of DM in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 178 hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19. The diagnosis was confirmed by naso-pharyngeal swab positivity for SARS-CoV-2. The severity of lung involvement was assessed by assigning to each patient a radiological score ranging from 1 to 4, based on chest imaging (chest X-rays or CT scans). Serum samples were tested for MSAs. RESULTS: Anti-PL-7 antibodies were detected in 10.1% of patients and were found to be associated with an increased risk of severe pulmonary involvement (p = 0.019) and a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Cutaneous lesions were observed in 26.4% of patients. However, none were cutaneous manifestations of DM. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of anti-PL7 antibodies might predict severe pulmonary involvement and a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

Development of a Preoperative Screening Tool to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality of COVID-19-positive Hepatobiliary Patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to create a preoperative risk assessment form for COVID-19-positive hepatobiliary patients to guide further prevention of complications after surgery and reduce morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: Based on the literature, focus groups, and case studies, a multidisciplinary panel of 15 experts conducted three rounds of a Delphi study that resulted in the development of a preoperative risk assessment form to be used by healthcare professionals in the treatment of COVID-19-positive hepatobiliary patients. METHODS: A preoperative risk assessment form for health professionals to use among COVID-19-positive hepatobiliary patients was developed based on literature, focus groups, and case studies. A 3-round Delphi study was conducted to validate and revise the risk assessment form using a multidisciplinary panel of 15 experts involved in hepatobiliary surgery. FINDINGS: The experts demonstrated high cooperation and familiarity with the research topic, with positive coefficients ranging from 93.33% to 100% and authority coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 0.86. The coordination coefficients were 0.33, 0.26, and 0.22, respectively, indicating good coordination among expert opinions. The final risk assessment form included 9 primary (first-level) indicators, 38 secondary (second-level) indicators, and 122 tertiary (third-level) indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative risk assessment form for hepatobiliary surgery patients infected with COVID-19 is scientifically rigorous, reliable, and valid. This screening tool may be used by health providers to identify high-risk patients, prevent postoperative complications, and reduce morbidity and mortality.

Immune Response Dynamics and Biomarkers in COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The immune response dynamics in COVID-19 patients remain a subject of intense investigation due to their implications for disease severity and treatment outcomes. We examined changes in leukocyte levels, eosinophil activity, and cytokine profiles in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: Serum samples were collected within the first 10 days of hospitalization/confirmed infection and analyzed for eosinophil granule proteins (EGP) and cytokines. Information from medical records including comorbidities, clinical symptoms, medications, and complete blood counts were collected at the time of admission, during hospitalization and at follow up approximately 3 months later. RESULTS: Serum levels of eotaxin, type 1 and type 2 cytokines, and alarmin cytokines were elevated in COVID-19 patients, highlighting the heightened immune response (p < 0.05). However, COVID-19 patients exhibited lower levels of eosinophils and eosinophil degranulation products compared to hospitalized controls (p < 0.05). Leukocyte counts increased consistently from admission to follow-up, indicative of recovery. CONCLUSION: Attenuated eosinophil activity alongside elevated chemokine and cytokine levels during active infection, highlights the complex interplay of immune mediators in the pathogenesis COVID-19 and underscores the need for further investigation into immune biomarkers and treatment strategies.

Upregulation of inflammatory genes and pathways links obesity to severe COVID-19.

Obesity is a risk factor for developing severe COVID-19. However, the mechanism underlying obesity-accelerated COVID-19 remains unclear. Here, we report results from a study in which 2-3-month-old K18-hACE2 (K18) mice were fed a western high-fat diet (WD) or normal chow (NC) over 3 months before intranasal infection with a sublethal dose of SARS-CoV2 WA1 (a strain ancestral to the Wuhan variant). After infection, the WD-fed K18 mice lost significantly more body weight and had more severe lung inflammation than normal chow (NC)-fed mice. Bulk RNA-seq analysis of lungs and adipose tissue revealed a diverse landscape of various immune cells, inflammatory markers, and pathways upregulated in the infected WD-fed K18 mice when compared with the infected NC-fed control mice. The transcript levels of IL-6, an important marker of COVID-19 disease severity, were upregulated in the lung at 6-9 days post-infection in the WD-fed mice when compared to NC-fed mice. Transcriptome analysis of the lung and adipose tissue obtained from deceased COVID-19 patients found that the obese patients had an increase in the expression of genes and the activation of pathways associated with inflammation as compared to normal-weight patients (n = 2). The K18 mouse model and human COVID-19 patient data support a link between inflammation and an obesity-accelerated COVID-19 disease phenotype. These results also indicate that obesity-accelerated severe COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 WA1 infection in the K18 mouse model would be a suitable model for dissecting the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying pathogenesis.

Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 colonization and high expression of inflammatory factors in cardiac tissue 6 months after COVID-19 recovery: a prospective cohort study.

Background: The presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in myocardial autopsy tissues has been observed in certain individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the duration of cardiac involvement remains uncertain among recovered COVID-19 patients. Our study aims to evaluate the long-term persistence of SARS-CoV-2 within cardiac tissue. Methods: We prospectively and consecutively evaluated the patients undergoing mitral valve replacement (MVR) and left atrial (LA) volume reduction surgery from May 25 to June 10, 2023 at our center, who had been approximately 6 months of recovery after Omicron wave. Patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 upon admission were excluded. The surgical LA tissue was collected in RNA preservation solution and stored at -80 ℃ immediately. Then SARS-CoV-2, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) RNA expression in LA tissues were assessed through thrice-repeated reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analyses. Categorical variables were assessed using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and continuous variables was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Nine of 41 patients were enrolled, all of whom tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 upon admission (two antigen and PCR tests). In four of nine patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in their LA tissue, indicating viral colonization. Among the four positive cases, the IL-6 and IL-1ß relative expression levels in the LA tissue of one patient were increased approximately 55- and 110-fold, respectively, compared to those of SARS-CoV-2 (-) patients. Increased expression of IL-6 and IL-1ß were observed in the myocardium of this patient. Another patient demonstrated a remarkable 7-fold increase in both IL-6 and IL-1ß expression, surpassing that of SARS-CoV-2 (-) patients. Additionally, no other cardiac inflammation-related diseases or conditions were presented in these two patients. The IL-6 and IL-1ß expression levels of the remaining two patients were not significantly different from those of SARS-CoV-2 (-) patients. The relative expression levels of IL-6 and IL-1ß in cardiac tissues of all SARS-CoV-2 (-) patients were relatively low. Interestingly, despite abnormally elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-1ß within their cardiac tissue, two patients did not show a significant increase in serum IL-6 and IL-1ß levels when compared to other patients. Conclusions: Our research suggests that certain COVID-19-recovered patients have persistent colonization of SARS-CoV-2 in their cardiac tissue, accompanied by a local increase in inflammatory factors.

Population pharmacokinetics of nirmatrelvir in Chinese patients with COVID-19: Therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing regimen selection in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To establish a population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) model of nirmatrelvir in Chinese COVID-19 patients and provide reference for refining the dosing strategy of nirmatrelvir in patients confirmed to be infected with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: A total of 80 blood samples were obtained from 35 mild to moderate COVID-19 patients who were orally administered nirmatrelvir/ritonavir tablets. The PopPK model of nirmatrelvir was developed using a nonlinear mixed effects modelling approach. The stability and prediction of the final model were assessed through a combination of goodness-of-fit and bootstrap method. The exposure of nirmatrelvir across various clinical scenarios was simulated using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of nirmatrelvir was well characterised by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption, and with creatinine clearance (Ccr) as the significant covariate. Typical population parameter estimates of apparent clearance and distribution volume for a patient with a Ccr of 95.5 mL·min-1were 3.45 L·h-1 and 48.71 L, respectively. The bootstrap and visual predictive check procedures demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance and robustness of the final model. CONCLUSION: The final model was capable of offering an early prediction of drug concentration ranges for different nirmatrelvir dosing regimens and optimise the dose regimen of nirmatrelvir in individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir in patients with severe COVID-19 and renal impairment: A case report.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (N/r) has received emergency use authorization for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 treatment in adult and pediatric patients (aged and weighing at least 12 years and 40 kg, respectively) presenting positive direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing results and a high risk of disease progression to severe COVID-19. However, information remains limited concerning the corresponding drug safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in patients with severe renal impairment. In this study, we present the case of a 91-year-old Chinese man who, despite exhibiting recurrent positive SARS-CoV-2 results and progression to severe COVID-19, was treated with N/r. Due to severe renal impairment and concurrent administration of continuous renal replacement therapy (continuous venovenous hemofiltration) during medication, we aimed to determine the serum N/r drug concentration in the patient. Our analysis revealed Cmax values of 12.42 and 2.001 µg/mL for nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, respectively. Despite the particularly high serum N/r concentration in this patient, the clinical and laboratory test analyses confirmed that the treatment was safe and effective. Nevertheless, N/r should be used with caution and at lower doses in patients with severe renal impairment to avoid potential high N/r concentration-related adverse reactions and events.

Long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with and without chemosensory disorders at disease onset: a psychophysical and magnetic resonance imaging exploratory study.

A preserved sense of smell and taste allows us to understand many environmental "messages" and results in meaningfully improvements to quality of life. With the COVID-19 pandemic, it became clear how important these senses are for social and nutritional status and catapulted this niche chemosensory research area towards widespread interest. In the current exploratory work, we assessed two groups of post-COVID-19 patients who reported having had (Group 1) or not (Group 2) a smell/taste impairment at the disease onset. The aim was to compare them using validated smell and taste tests as well as with brain magnetic resonance imaging volumetric analysis. Normative data were used for smell scores comparison and a pool of healthy subjects, recruited before the pandemic, served as controls for taste scores. The majority of patients in both groups showed an olfactory impairment, which was more severe in Group 1 (median UPSIT scores: 24.5 Group 1 vs 31.0 Group 2, p = 0.008), particularly among women (p = 0.014). No significant differences emerged comparing taste scores between Group 1 and Group 2, but dysgeusia was only present in Group 1 patients. However, for taste scores, a significant difference was found between Group 1 and controls (p = 0.005). No MRI anatomical abnormalities emerged in any patients while brain volumetric analysis suggested a significant difference among groups for the right caudate nucleus (p = 0.028), although this was not retained following Benjamini-Hochberg correction. This exploratory study could add new information in COVID-19 chemosensory long-lasting impairment and address future investigations on the post-COVID-19 patients' research.

Association between vaccination and days of hospitalization in adult patients with non-severe COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: To explore the association between vaccination status and the days of hospitalization in non-severe adult COVID-19 patients. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively analyzed the 368 non-severe adult COVID-19 patients which were divided into three groups according to their vaccination status. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis were performed to determine the correlation between vaccination and the days of hospitalization. A generalized additive model and hierarchical linear regression model were used for outcome analysis. RESULTS: In the regression equation, the increase in the number of vaccine shots was significantly correlated with the decrease in the days of hospitalization (all p < 0.001). Particularly, the reduction of the days of hospitalization in patients with 3 injections of the vaccine was more significant than that of the 0-1 injection group (ß: -2.810, -2.525, and -2.831; p < 0.001). Curve fitting showed that the relationship between the number of vaccination injections and the days of hospitalization was approximately linear, and the ß value was -1.522 (95% CI: -2.091 - -0.954; p < 0.001). Among various laboratory indexes, only the monocyte ratio significantly affected the correlation between the number of vaccination injections and the days of hospitalization, indicating an interaction (p =0.027). The ß values of the monocyte ratio in normal and elevated groups were -2.230 (95% CI: -3.048 - -1.412; p < 0.001) and -0.763 (95% CI: -1.520 - -0.005; p = 0.050), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In non-severe adult COVID-19 patients, there was a negative linear correlation between the vaccination status and the days of hospitalization.

Genetic diversity and seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in COVID­19 patients; a first case-control study in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasmosis is a serious or life-threatening disease in immunosuppressed patients and pregnant women. This study examined the likely association between Toxoplasma gondii infection and COVID-19 patients with moderate illness. METHODS: Seventy blood samples were collected from patients at the Health Reference Laboratory of Tabriz, Northwest Iran from April 2021 to September 2021. In addition, 70 healthy subjects of the same age (37 ± 15 years) and sex distribution were ethnically matched. Sera samples were examined for the detection of anti-Toxoplasma antibodies using ELISA. Nested-PCR targets were amplified based on the B1 and GRA6 genes. GRA6 amplicons were subjected to sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: The seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis based on IgG titer was 35.7% in the COVID­19 patients and 27.1% in the control group, representing not to be associated with the Toxoplasma seropositivity in COVID­19 patients (P = 0.18) compared to healthy subjects. Anti-T. gondii IgM was not found in any of the patients and healthy individuals. According to PCR amplification of the B1 and GRA6 genes, the frequency of T. gondii in COVID-19 patients was 14.2% (10/70). However, no T. gondii infection was detected in the healthy group. The CD4+T cell count was relatively lower in toxoplasmosis-infected patients (430-450 cells/mm3) than in control group (500-1500 cells/mm3). High genetic diversity (Hd: 0.710) of the type I strain of T. gondii was characterized in the patients. Present results showed that consumption of raw vegetables and close contact with stray cats can increase the transmission of T. gondii to COVID-19 patients (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed that T. gondii type I infection is unequivocally circulating among the COVID-19 patients in Tabriz; However, no significant association was observed between the occurrence of Toxoplasma and the severity of COVID-19. To make more accurate health decisions, multicenter investigations with a larger sample size of different ethnic groups of the Iranian population are needed.

Peripheral Blood CD8+T Cell as a Prognostic Biomarker for Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients Without Antiviral Treatment.

Background: The status of T lymphocyte subset counts in patients with COVID-19 remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess alterations in peripheral blood CD3+CD8+T (CD8+T) cells among hospitalized COVID-19 patients who have not received antiviral treatment and to evaluate their prognostic value within this patient population. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study and a meta-analysis were conducted. The cohort study was performed at Xiangya Hospital from December 5, 2022, to January 31, 2023. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the association between peripheral blood CD3+CD8+T cells and mortality in COVID-19 patients who did not receive antiviral therapy. All relevant studies in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science databases were systematically searched for meta-analysis. Results: The retrospective cohort study included 201 patients. A significant decrease in peripheral blood CD8+ T cell count was found to be associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 13.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.15-61.23), after adjusting for gender, age, comorbidities, severity at admission, steroid therapy, and antibiotic therapy. The threshold value for CD8+T cell counts, determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, was 145.5 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.828, specificity: 90.3%, sensitivity: 72.9%, P<0.001). Additionally, A total of 7 studies with 2765 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis reveals a significant association between lower CD8+ T cell counts and mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 3.543, 95% CI: 1.726 to 7.272; I2=93%). Conclusion: Peripheral blood CD8+ T cell can serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker for hospitalized patients who do not receive antiviral treatment.

ROX index performance to predict high-flow nasal oxygen outcome in Covid-19 related hypoxemic acute respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND: Given the pathophysiology of hypoxemia in patients with Covid-19 acute respiratory failure (ARF), it seemed necessary to evaluate whether ROX index (ratio SpO2/FiO2 to respiratory rate) could accurately predict intubation or death in these patients initially treated by high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO). We aimed, therefore, to assess the accuracy of ROX index to discriminate between HFNO failure (sensitivity) and HFNO success (specificity). METHODS: We designed a multicentre retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients with Covid-19 ARF. In addition to its accuracy, we assessed the usefulness of ROX index to predict HFNO failure (intubation or death) via logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 218 ARF patients screened, 99 were first treated with HFNO, including 49 HFNO failures (46 intubations, 3 deaths before intubation). At HFNO initiation (H0), ROX index sensitivity was 63% (95%CI 48-77%) and specificity 76% (95%CI 62-87%) using Youden's index. With 4.88 as ROX index cut-off at H12, sensitivity was 29% (95%CI 14-48%) and specificity 90% (95%CI 78-97%). Youden's index yielded 8.73 as ROX index cut-off at H12, with 87% sensitivity (95%CI 70-96%) and 45% specificity (95%CI 31-60%). ROX index at H0 was associated with HFNO failure (p = 0.0005) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that SAPS II (p = 0.0003) and radiographic extension of pulmonary injuries (p = 0.0263), rather than ROX index, were predictive of HFNO failure. CONCLUSIONS: ROX index cut-off values seem population-specific and the ROX index appears to have a technically acceptable but clinically low capability to discriminate between HFNO failures and successes in Covid-19 ARF patients. In addition, SAPS II and pulmonary injuries at ICU admission appear more useful than ROX index to predict the risk of intubation.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection as a Cause of Acute Myocardial Infarction in COVID-19 Patients: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Patients with COVID-19 often experience significant cardiovascular complications, including heart failure, myocarditis, and acute coronary syndrome. We present the case of a male patient with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, complicated with inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), which was attributed to spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). We also make a review of the literature on case reports of patients with COVID-19 and acute myocardial infarction due to SCAD. Through these clinical cases, a potential correlation between SCAD and COVID-19 infection is implied. Endothelial dysfunction, thrombotic complications, and disturbance of the vascular tone are established COVID-19 sequelae, triggered either by direct viral injury or mediated by the cytokines' storm. These abnormalities in the coronary vasculature and the vasa vasorum could result in SCAD. Moreover, disturbances of the vascular tone can cause coronary vasospasm, a reported precipitant of SCAD. Thus, SCAD should be considered in COVID-19 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and in the case of STEMI, an early angiographic evaluation, if feasible, should be performed rather than thrombolysis to avoid potential adverse events of the latter in the setting of SCAD.

Real-Time Camera Image-Guided Nasoenteric Tube Placement in Prone COVID-19 ICU Patients: A Single-Center Study.

Background & Aims: This study aims to assess the application value of the real-time camera image-guided nasoenteric tube placement in critically ill COVID-19 patients undergoing endotracheal intubation and prone position ventilation therapy. Methods: We enrolled 116 COVID-19 patients receiving endotracheal intubation and prone position ventilation therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients were randomly divided into the real-time camera image-guided nasoenteric tube placement (n = 58) and bedside blind insertion (n = 58) groups. The success rate, placement time, complications, cost, heart rate, respiratory rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scores were compared between the 2 groups. Results: For ICU patients with COVID-19 undergoing prone position ventilation therapy, the success rate and cost were significantly higher in the real-time camera image-guided group compared to the bedside blind group (P < .05). The placement time and complication incidence were significantly lower in the real-time camera image-guided group (P < .05). The differences in heart rate, respiratory rate, GCS scores, and APACHE-II scores were insignificant (P > .05). Conclusions: The real-time camera image-guided nasoenteric tube placement system had advantages for ICU COVID-19 patients undergoing prone position ventilation therapy, including a high success rate, short placement time, and no impact on patient position during tube placement. Real-time camera image-guided nasoenteric tube placement can be performed in any position, and demonstrates high efficiency, safety, and accuracy.

A Mouthwash with Cetylpyridinium Chlorideis reducing salivary SARS-CoV-2 viral load in +COVID-19 / Un enjuague con Cloruro de Cetilpiridinio redujo la carga salival del virus SARSCoV-2 en pacientes con Covid-19

Aim: The aim of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial is to evaluate the capacity of a mouthwash to reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral load in the saliva of patients with COVID-19. Methods: Twenty-three symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive outpatients were selected andrandomised into two groups and registered at NTC 04563689. Both groups rinsed and gargled for one minute with either distilled water (Placebo) or with 0.05% Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) plus 0.12% Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash (PERIOAID Intensive Care). Saliva samples were collected before the use of placebo or mouthwash and after 15 minutes and 1 and 2 hours of either of the above treatment. A saliva sample was also taken five days after regular use of placebo or mouthwash twice daily. The virus was detected by qRT-PCR. Results: A great heterogeneity in the viral load values was observed at baseline in both groups for nasopharyngeal and saliva samples. Most of the patients who used the mouthwash (8/12) had a significant decrease in baseline viral load after 15 min (greater than 99% reduction). This inhibitory effect was maintained for up to two hours in 10 of the 12 patients. At five days, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detectedin only 1 patient from the mouthwash group and in 5 from the placebo group. Conclusions: This study points out that a CPC mouthwash can reduce the viral load in saliva of COVID-positive patients. This finding may be important in transmission control of SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, the clinical relevance of CPC mouthwash-reduction on SARS-CoV-2 shedding in saliva requires further study.

Objetivo: El objetivo de este ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado, doble ciego y controlado con placebo es evaluar la capacidad de un enjuague bucal para reducir la carga viral del SARS-CoV-2 en la saliva de pacientes con COVID-19. Materiales y métodos:Veintitrés pacientes ambulatorios positivos para SARS-CoV-2 sintomáticos fueron seleccionados y aleatorizados en dos grupos y registrados en el NTC 04563689. Ambos grupos se enjuagaron y hicieron gárgaras durante un minuto con agua destilada (placebo) o con cloruro decetilpiridinio al 0 ,05 % (CPC). ) más enjuague bucal con Clorhexidina (CHX) al 0,12% (PERIOAID Intensive Care). Se recolectaron muestras de saliva antes del uso de placebo o enjuague bucal y después de 15 minutos y 1 y 2 horas de cualquiera de los tratamientos anteriores. También se tomó una muestra de saliva cinco días después del uso regular de placebo o enjuague bucal dos veces al día. El virus fue detectado por qRT-PCR. Resultados:Se demostró una gran heterogeneidad en los valores de carga viral al inicio del estudio en grupos ambos para muestras de nasofaringe y saliva. La mayoría de los pacientes que usaron el enjuague bucal (8/12) tuvieron una disminución significativa en la carga viral inicial después de 15 minutos (reducción superior al 99 %). Este efecto inhibidor se mantuvo hasta dos horas en 10 de los 12 pacientes. A los cinco días, se detectó ARN del SARS-CoV-2 en solo 1 paciente del grupo de enjuague bucal y en 5 del grupo de placebo. Conclusiones:Este señala que un enjuague bucal CPC puedereducir la carga viral en saliva de pacientes COVID positivos. Este hallazgo puede ser importante en el control de la transmisión del SARS-CoV-2. Sin embargo, la relevancia clínica de la reducción del enjuague bucal con CPC en la excreción de SARS-CoV-2 en la saliva requiere más estudios.

Guiding future research on psychological interventions in people with COVID-19 and post COVID syndrome and comorbid emotional disorders based on a systematic review.

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has been emotionally challenging for the entire population and especially for people who contracted the illness. This systematic review summarizes psychological interventions implemented in COVID-19 and long COVID-19 patients who presented comorbid emotional disorders. Methods and measures: 3,839 articles were identified in 6 databases and 43 of them were included in this work. Two independent researchers selected the articles and assessed their quality. Results: 2,359 adults were included in this review. Severity of COVID-19 symptoms ranged from asymptomatic to hospitalized patients; only 3 studies included long COVID-19 populations. Similar number of randomized controlled studies (n = 15) and case studies (n = 14) were found. Emotional disorders were anxiety and/or depressive symptoms (n = 39) and the psychological intervention most represented had a cognitive behavioral approach (n = 10). Length of psychological programs ranged from 1-5 sessions (n = 6) to 16 appointments (n = 2). Some programs were distributed on a daily (n = 4) or weekly basis (n = 2), but other proposed several sessions a week (n = 4). Short (5-10 min, n = 4) and long sessions (60-90 min, n = 3) are proposed. Most interventions were supported by the use of technologies (n = 18). Important risk of bias was present in several studies. Conclusion: Promising results in the reduction of depressive, anxiety and related disorders have been found. However, important limitations in current psychological interventions were detected (i.e., duration, format, length, and efficacy of interventions were not consistently established across investigations). The results derived from our work may help to understand clinical practices in the context of pandemics and could guide future efforts to manage emotional suffering in COVID-19 patients. A stepped model of care could help to determine the dosage, length and format of delivery for each patient.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022367227. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022367227.

Contribution of human recombinant Interferon-Alpha 2b treatment in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 virus infection / Contribución del tratamiento con Interferón-Alpha 2b humano recombinante en pacientes sintomáticos y asintomáticos con infección por el virus SARS-CoV2

Introduction: Subjects with asymptomatic infections are not generally admitted to health care facilities, however, they may benefit from antiviral therapy. Objective: To evaluate the contribution to treatment with combined therapy based on recombinant human interferon alpha 2b + Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Chloroquine versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Chloroquine in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Material and Methods: An observational study was carried out in patients with a positive diagnosis of COVID-19 from April 1st to July 30th, 2020. From a total of 308 patients treated with interferon + Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Chloroquine, we selected a statistically representative sample of 40 patients using a simple randomization process. As a control group, 27 patients who only received treatment with Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Chloroquine were selected. These patients underwent determinations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, determinations of inflammatory markers, and follow-up by RT-PCR to evaluate the time length of negativization. Results: The group treated with interferon had a significantly shorter time to negativization. Patients treated with interferon showed a significant decrease in inflammatory markers at the time of hospital discharge and they had an increase in antibody titers at two and four months after hospital discharge, compared to the group of patients who did not receive interferon. Conclusions: The treatment with exogenous interferon in patients with COVID-19 had a significant contribution to the regulation of the immune response of the patients(AU)

Introducción: Los sujetos con infección asintomática generalmente no son admitidos en centros de asistencia médica, sin embargo, pueden beneficiarse de la terapia antiviral. Objetivo: evaluar la contribución al tratamiento de la terapia combinada basada en interferón alfa 2b recombinante humano + Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Cloroquina contra Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Cloroquina en pacientes asintomáticos y sintomáticos. Material y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional en pacientes con diagnóstico positivo de COVID-19, durante los días del 1 de abril al 30 de julio de 2020. De un total de 308 pacientes tratados con interferón + Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Cloroquina, se seleccionaron mediante un proceso de aleatorización simple, una muestra estadísticamente representativa de 40 pacientes. Como grupo control se seleccionaron 27 pacientes que solo recibieron tratamiento con Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Cloroquina. Estos pacientes se sometieron a determinaciones de anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2, determinaciones de marcadores inflamatorios y seguimiento por RT-PCR para evaluar el tiempo de negativización. Resultados: El grupo tratado con interferón tuvo un tiempo significativamente más corto de negativización. Los pacientes tratados con interferón mostraron una disminución significativa de los marcadores inflamatorios en el momento del alta hospitalaria y tuvieron un incremento de los títulos de anticuerpos a los dos y cuatro meses posteriores al alta hospitalaria, en comparación con el grupo de pacientes que no recibió interferón. Conclusiones: El tratamiento con interferón exógeno en pacientes con COVID-19 tuvo una contribución significativa en la regulación de la respuesta inmune de los pacientes(AU)

Fecal calprotectin as a predictor of COVID-19 severity

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is highly transmittable through contact with respiratory droplets. The virus is also shed in fecal matter. Some patients may present with effects in more than one system; however, there are no defined biomarkers that can accurately predict the course or progression of the disease. The present study aimed to estimate the severity of the disease, to correlate the severity of the disease with biochemical predictors, to identify valuable biomarkers indicative of gastrointestinal disease, and to determine the cutoff values. A cross-sectional study was conducted on COVID-19 patients admitted to the Kafrelsheikh University Hospital (isolation unit) between July 10, 2020, and October 30, 2020. The diagnosis of COVID- 19 was confirmed via reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which was employed for the detection of the viral RNA. We conclude that lymphopenia, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and liver enzymes were among the most important laboratory findings in COVID-19 patients. Statistically significant differences in platelet count, neutrophil count, D-dimer level, and fecal calprotectin levels were observed among patients presenting with chest symptoms only and patients with both chest and gastrointestinal symptoms (p=0.004;<0.001; 0.010; 0.003; and<0.001, respectively). C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and fecal calprotectin levels positively correlated with disease severity. The cutoff value for fecal calprotectin that can predict gastrointestinal involvement in COVID-19 was 165.0, with a sensitivity of 88.1% and a specificity of 76.5%. (AU)