Impact of renal denervation on quality of life (How does renal denervation contribute to improving hypertension treatment affected by poor medication adherence?).

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved renal denervation (RDN) as a new treatment option for hypertension (HT) because it not only has antihypertensive effects but also improves the quality of blood pressure (BP) reduction. RDN is expected to be increasingly used in clinical practice in the future. This review summarizes the impact of RDN on quality of life (QOL). Although the treatment of HT aims to improve life prognosis, the use of antihypertensive agents can impair QOL because of adverse effects and lifestyle changes associated with long-term medication use. Consequently, poor adherence to antihypertensive agents is a common problem and may be the most important issue affecting patient QOL. In RDN trials in patients taking antihypertensive agents, approximately 40% of patients had poor adherence to the drugs. Poor adherence is often the cause of resistant hypertension. Therefore, RDN should be well suited to treating HT and improving QOL. Studies have shown that approximately 30% of HT patients prefer RDN to drug treatment. Patients who prefer RDN are typically male and younger and have high BP, poor adherence, and a history of adverse effects of antihypertensive agents. We hope that RDN will improve not only life prognosis but also QOL in HT patients because of its benefits for adherence. Furthermore, we expect that in the future, RDN will be used in other sympathetic nervous system-related diseases, such as heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and sleep apnea syndrome.

Intravascular Ultrasound Can Be Used to Locate Nerves, but not Confirm Ablation, During Renal Sympathetic Denervation.

BACKGROUND: No methods exist for confirming nerve ablation in catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN). METHODS: We investigated the feasibility of using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to locate nerves and observe nerve integrity changes during RDN in a pig. To confirm our observations, we used post-RDN histological sections matched anatomically to the IVUS images. RESULTS: IVUS revealed multiple hypoechoic structures along the renal artery, whose locations matched those of nerves in the histological sections. Nerves clustered near the junction between the renal artery and vein. Histology confirmed necrosis of nerve bundles at RDN ablation sites, but no changes in echogenicity were observed using IVUS. CONCLUSIONS: Although IVUS cannot currently be used to confirm ablation during RDN, it clearly reveals some clusters of renal sympathetic nerves. It remains to be demonstrated how IVUS can guide RDN devices and potentially improve ablation success.

The Prevalence of Japanese Outpatients with Hypertension Who Meet the Definition of Treatment Resistant Hypertension and Are Eligible for Enrolment in Clinical Trials of Endovascular Ultrasound Renal Denervation.

Objective A clinical trial (REQUIRE) was started to investigate the use of an ultrasound renal denervation system in the treatment of resistant hypertension (RHT). We analyzed the prevalence of patients who were eligible for inclusion in this cross-sectional study at the time of screening. Methods Nine-hundred ninety-nine consecutive hypertension (HT) patients who were treated in our hospital as outpatients were classified into the following categories: patients treated with at least 3 types of antihypertensive drugs including diuretic agents who were eligible for enrolment in SYMPLICITY HTN-Japan (SH-J) with an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥160 mmHg, who were ≤80 years of age, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (RHT-S); and patients who were treated similar medications and who were eligible for enrolment in REQUIRE, with an SBP of ≥150 mmHg, ≤75 years of age, and an eGFR of ≥40 mL/min/1.73 m2 (RHT-R). We investigated the proportion of patients in each category. We also investigated HT patients (1,423 cases) who were enrolled in the Chikushi Anti-Hypertension Trial (CHAT), a research network that includes general practitioners. Results Eleven patients (1.1%) with RHT-S and 18 patients (1.8%) with RHT-R were identified. After the exclusion of patients with secondary HT and a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of <90 mmHg (applied in REQUIRE), 5 patients (0.5%) with RHT-S and 4 patients (0.4%) with RHT-R remained. In the analysis of the CHAT study, only 2 (0.1%) patients with RHT-R remained. Conclusion The number of eligible patients in the REQUIRE trial was decreased, largely due to the strict age restriction and the new DBP limitation. The prevalence of eligible patients in REQUIRE was estimated to be approximately 0.5 to 0.8 times that in SH-J. Since patient enrollment will be difficult, drastic measures may be required to recruit eligible patients.

Long-term follow-up after radio-frequency catheter-based denervation in patients with resistant hypertension.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this single-center study was to asses the long-term clinical data of patients with resistant hypertension who underwent radiofrequency renal denervation (RND). METHODS: Out of 86 patients with resistant-hypertension, 15 pts fulfilled the study criteria for performing RND using Simplicity system by Medtronic. RESULTS: Baseline office systolic BP was 204±32.7 and diastolic BP 107.7±15.1mmHg. Baseline 24h ambulatory systolic BP was 151.8±13.9 and diastolic BP 86.8±13.8mmHg. Patients were treated with an average of 5 antihypertensive agents in maximally tolerated doses (including diuretic) during the whole trial and were followed up at 1,6,24month after RND. At every appointment an echocardiography, blood test, and blood pressure (office and ABMP) measurements were performed. The mean reduction in office systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were the following: There were no procedural complications. All denervations were performed by experienced operator. CONCLUSIONS: We regard RND as a safe and effective procedure in resistant hypertension, although more studies and trials are needed to find the most adequate model of a patient that would be a good responder to RND.