Antibody-drug conjugates combinations in cancer treatment.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a promising class of anticancer agents. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration has granted approval to 12 compounds, with 2 later undergoing withdrawal. Moreover, several other compounds are currently under clinical development at different stages. Despite substantial antitumoral activity observed among different tumor types, adverse events and the development of resistance represent significant challenges in their use. Over the last years, an increasing number of clinical trials have been testing these drugs in different combinations with other anticancer agents, such as traditional chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and small targeted agents, reporting promising results based on possible synergistic effects and a potential for improved treatment outcomes among different tumor types. Here we will review combinations of ADCs with other antitumor agents aiming at describing the current state of the art and future directions.

Liver injury due to endothelin receptor antagonists: a real-world study based on post-marketing drug monitoring data.

BACKGROUND: Liver injury is the hallmark adverse reaction of endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA). Since the first drug, bosentan has been widely used in clinical practice, hepatotoxicity has been accompanied by the history of ERA. The new ERA has been proven to have a lower liver risk but the current research findings are inconsistent. ERA-based targeted drug combinations are commonly used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, where the risk of liver injury is difficult to estimate. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the correlation between ERA and different ERA combination regimens with liver injury in the real world. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study using data from the Adverse Event Reporting System (Food and Drug Administration AERS, FAERS). METHODS: The study used proportional imbalance and Bayesian analysis to mine FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 to determine the association of three ERAs with liver injury and to further mine the risk of liver injury due to the combination of ERAs with other targeted drugs. In addition, we analyzed the onset time, mortality, and hospitalization rate of liver injury caused by different ERA combination regimens. RESULTS: We screened out 3581 ERA-related liver injury events, of which bosentan (59.82%) had the largest number of cases. The patients with liver injury were mainly female (60.63%), and the age was concentrated between 61 and 75 years (26.75%). According to different signal mining methods, reporting odds ratio (ROR; 3.38, 95% confidence interval = 3.23-3.53), proportional reporting ratio (PRR; 3.22, χ2 = 37.84), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN; 1.68, 95% confidence interval = 1.61), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS; 3.21, 95% confidence interval = 3.09), bosentan had the strongest association with liver injury compared to ambrisentan and macitentan. Furthermore, bosentan + sildenafil [ROR (2.52, 95% confidence interval = 2.23-2.84), PRR (2.44, χ2 = 15.92), BCPNN (1.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.14), MGPS (2.44, 95% confidence interval = 2.21)], bosentan + epoprostenol [ROR (5.39, 95% confidence interval = 4.29-6.77), PRR (4.94, χ2 = 65.18), BCPNN (2.30, 95% confidence interval = 1.83), MGPS (4.94, 95% confidence interval = 4.08)], bosentan + iloprost [ROR (2.70, 95% confidence interval = 2.11-3.45), PRR (2.61, χ2 = 31.03), BCPNN (1.38, 95% confidence interval = 1.08), MGPS (2.61, 95% confidence interval = 2.12)] had a higher risk of liver injury caused by the three ERA combination regimens. The median time to onset of hepatotoxicity associated with all ERA combination regimens was 259 days (interquartile range: 58-716.5 days). Finally, the hospitalization rate for patients experiencing hepatotoxicity with ERA combination regimens was 47.86% and the mortality rate was 12.67%. CONCLUSION: By mining the FAERS, we analyzed and compared the risk of liver injury related to different ERA and ERA combination regimens, and the onset time and adverse reaction outcomes of all ERA combination regimens. According to the results of the study, bosentan had the highest risk of liver injury and the combination regimens bosentan + sildenafil, bosentan + epoprostenol, and bosentan + iloprost had a stronger risk of liver injury. From the early stages of treatment, we need to regularly monitor the liver function of patients, especially for females and the elderly, and discontinue the suspected drug as soon as the liver injury occurs.

Tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoints inhibitors in favorable risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Trick or treat?

Over the past decade, the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone rapid evolution, culminating in a significant improvement in prognosis with frontline immunotherapy. RCC is a highly immunogenic and pro-angiogenic cancer, and mounting evidence has established the immunosuppressive effects of pro-angiogenic factors on the host's immune system. Anti-angiogenic agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and bevacizumab, which obstruct the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, have demonstrated the potential to enhance antitumor activity and improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Consequently, various combinations of TKIs and ICIs have been assessed and are currently considered the preferred regimens for all metastatic RCC patients, regardless of their prognostic risk score. Nevertheless, some inquiries have arisen within the medical community, as metastatic RCC patients with favorable risk scores who received ICIs and TKIs in combination showed no statistically significant advantage in overall survival compared to those treated with sunitinib alone. Considering these concerns, this review aims to elucidate the rationale behind TKI and ICI combination therapies, provide a summary of current first-line metastatic RCC combinations approved for use, with a focus on favorable-risk patients, and outline present challenges and future perspectives in this context.

Predicting neutralization susceptibility to combination HIV-1 monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibody regimens.

Combination monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are currently being developed for preventing HIV-1 infection. Recent work has focused on predicting in vitro neutralization potency of both individual bnAbs and combination regimens against HIV-1 pseudoviruses using Env sequence features. To predict in vitro combination regimen neutralization potency against a given HIV-1 pseudovirus, previous approaches have applied mathematical models to combine individual-bnAb neutralization and have predicted this combined neutralization value; we call this the combine-then-predict (CP) approach. However, prediction performance for some individual bnAbs has exceeded that for the combination, leading to another possibility: combining the individual-bnAb predicted values and using these to predict combination regimen neutralization; we call this the predict-then-combine (PC) approach. We explore both approaches in both simulated data and data from the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Compile, Neutralize, and Tally NAb Panels repository. The CP approach is superior to the PC approach when the neutralization outcome of interest is binary (e.g., neutralization susceptibility, defined as inhibitory concentration < 1 µg/mL. For continuous outcomes, the CP approach performs at least as well as the PC approach, and is superior to the PC approach when the individual-bnAb prediction algorithms have poor performance. This knowledge may be used when building prediction models for novel antibody combinations in the absence of in vitro neutralization data for the antibody combination; this, in turn, will aid in the evaluation and down-selection of these antibody combinations into prevention efficacy trials.

Role of dalbavancin as combination therapy: evidence from the literature and clinical scenarios.

INTRODUCTION: The off-label use of dalbavancin in patients with infections other than acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) represents an interesting therapeutic option. Its use as monotherapy or in combination with other antibiotics should be better defined. AREAS COVERED: The aim of this review is to summarize evidence about the potential role of dalbavancin in combination with other antibiotics and describe clinical scenarios in which combination regimens including dalbavancin are useful. The studies were retrieved from PubMed using different combinations of keywords ('dalbavancin,' 'combination,' and 'synergy'). EXPERT OPINION: Limited data about the use of dalbavancin in monotherapy or combined with other antibiotics are available. In vitro assays showed a synergistic effect of dalbavancin when combined with beta-lactam antibiotics. The use of dalbavancin as a combination therapy in patients with ABSSSI did not demonstrate superiority compared to monotherapy. Conversely, combination regimens including dalbavancin may be useful in specific infection types, such as bone and prosthetic joint infections or subacute/chronic intravascular infections with no possibility of device removal. Potential partner drugs might be rifampin, beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, doxycycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The choice of the companion drug should be tailored on in vitro results of synergistic tests, patient's profile, and type of infection.

Multi-analyte liquid biopsies for molecular pathway guided personalized treatment selection in advanced refractory cancers: A clinical utility pilot study.

Purpose: The selection of safe and efficacious anticancer regimens for treatment of patients with broadly refractory metastatic cancers remains a clinical challenge. Such patients are often fatigued by toxicities of prior failed treatments and may have no further viable standard of care treatment options. Liquid Biopsy-based multi-analyte profiling in peripheral blood can identify a majority of drug targets that can guide the selection of efficacious combination regimens. Patients and methods: LIQUID IMPACT was a pilot clinical study where patients with advanced refractory cancers received combination anticancer treatment regimens based on multi-analyte liquid biopsy (MLB) profiling of circulating tumor biomarkers; this study design was based on the findings of prior feasibility analysis to determine the abundance of targetable variants in blood specimens from 1299 real-world cases of advanced refractory cancers. Results: Among the 29 patients in the intent to treat (ITT) cohort of the trial, 26 were finally evaluable as per study criteria out of whom 12 patients showed Partial Response (PR) indicating an Objective Response Rate (ORR) of 46.2% and 11 patients showed Stable Disease (SD) indicating the Disease Control Rate (DCR) to be 88.5%. The median Progression-Free Survival (mPFS) and median Overall Survival (mOS) were 4.3 months (95% CI: 3.0 - 5.6 months) and 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.0 - 10.7 months), respectively. Toxicities were manageable and there were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that MLB could be used to assist treatment selection in heavily pretreated patients with advanced refractory cancers.

A triple combination gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin to effectively control triple-negative breast cancer tumor development, recurrence, and metastasis.

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive, lethal, heterogeneous type of breast cancer (BC). TNBC tends to have a lower response rate to chemotherapy and a lower 5-year survival rate than other types of BC due to recurrence and metastasis. Our previous study revealed that a combination of gemcitabine, romidepsin, and cisplatin was efficacious in controlling TNBC tumor development. In this study, we extended our investigation of gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin in controlling TNBC tumor recurrence and metastasis. METHODS: We investigated the ability of gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin to control cell survival and invasiveness using cell viability, soft agar colony formation, and transwell invasion assays. We determined the efficacy of gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin in controlling tumor recurrence and metastasis using cell-derived xenograft animal models. We used immunoblotting to study signaling modulators regulated by gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin in TNBC cells and tumor tissues. RESULTS: Treatment with gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin reduced the TNBC MDA-MB231 and MDA-MB468 cell survival to ~ 50% and ~ 15%, as well as invasiveness to ~ 31% and ~ 13%, respectively. Gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin suppressed modulators involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in an ROS-dependent manner. Controlling tumor recurrence, the Gem plus Rom + Cis regimen (~ 112%) was more efficacious than the Gem plus Cis regimen (~ 21%) in tumor growth inhibition. The Gem plus Rom + Cis regimen efficaciously reduced the development of metastatic nodules to 20% in animals. CONCLUSION: The gemcitabine plus romidepsin + cisplatin regimen was highly efficacious in controlling TNBC tumor development, recurrence, and metastasis in animals. The combination regimen should be poised for efficient translation into clinical trials for controlling the recurrence and metastasis, ultimately contributing to reducing mortality and improving TNBC patients' quality of life.

The role of cladribine in acute myeloid leukemia: an old drug up to new tricks.

Despite advances in understanding the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the standard therapy remained nearly unchanged for several decades. There have been many efforts to improve the response and survival by either increasing the cytarabine (ARA-C) dose or adding a third agent to the standard chemotherapy regimen. Several studies have evaluated the addition of cladribine (CdA) to standard induction, exploiting its property to potentiate ARA-C uptake. Response rates for combination regimens including CdA in relapsed/refractory (R/R) adults are approximately 50% and approximately 70% in de novo AML. Recently, a low intensity combination of CdA and ARA-C alternating with decitabine has shown promising results in older patients with AML. In this review, we will discuss the role of CdA in the treatment of AML, summarizing the recent clinical data regarding its incorporation into the induction therapy for adult AML.

Formulation of a triple combination gemcitabine plus romidepsin + cisplatin regimen to efficaciously and safely control triple-negative breast cancer tumor development.

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive, lethal, and heterogeneous subtype of breast cancers, tending to have lower 5-year survival rates than other BC subtypes in response to conventional chemotherapies. This study's aim was to identify advanced regimens to effectively control TNBC tumor development. METHODS: We investigated the combination of the DNA synthesis inhibitor gemcitabine, the DNA-damaging agent cisplatin, and the histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin to control a variety of breast cells in vitro. We studied the toxicity of drug doses and administration schedules to determine tolerable combination regimens in immune-deficient nude and -competent BALB/c mice. We then studied the efficacy of tolerable regimens in controlling TNBC cell-derived xenograft development in nude mice. By reducing clinically equivalent doses of each agent in combination, we formulated tolerable regimens in animals. We verified that the tolerable triple combination gemcitabine plus romidepsin + cisplatin regimen more efficacious than double combination regimens in controlling xenograft tumor development in nude mice. RESULTS: A triple combination of gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin synergistically induced death of the TNBC M.D. Anderson-Metastatic Breast cancer (MDA-MB) 231 and MDA-MB468, as well as Michigan Cancer Foundation (MCF) 7, MCF10A, and MCF10A-Ras cells. Cell death induced by gemcitabine + romidepsin + cisplatin was in a reactive oxygen species-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: Considering the high costs for developing a new anticancer agent, we used the FDA-approved drugs gemcitabine, romidepsin (is approved for T-cell lymphoma and is under clinical trial for TNBC), and cisplatin to economically formulate an efficacious and safe combination regimen. The highly efficacious gemcitabine plus romidepsin + cisplatin regimen should be poised for efficient translation into clinical trials, ultimately contributing to reduced mortality and improved quality of life for TNBC patients.

Antimicrobial treatment challenges in the era of carbapenem resistance.

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are burdened by high mortality and represent an urgent threat to address. Clinicians are currently at a dawn of a new era in which antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacilli is being dealt with by the availability of the first new antibiotics in this field for many years. Although new antibiotics have shown promising results in clinical trials, there is still uncertainty over whether their use will improve clinical outcomes in real world practice. Some observational studies have reported a survival benefit in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections using combination therapy, often including "old" antibiotics such as colistin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, and carbapenems. These regimens, however, are linked to increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, and their efficacy has yet to be compared to new antimicrobial options. While awaiting more definitive evidence, antibiotic stewards need clear direction on how to optimize the use of old and novel antibiotic options. Furthermore, carbapenem-sparing regimens should be carefully considered as a potential tool to reduce selective antimicrobial pressure.

Prevention of Breast Cancer by Natural Phytochemicals: Focusing on Molecular Targets and Combinational Strategy.

Starting from the 21st century, breast cancer can be classified as the most common invasive malignancy in women. Among the preventive or therapeutic strategies of breast cancer, combination therapy is the most promising approach. This mode of treatment of breast cancer concurrently maximizes efficacy, overcomes multidrug resistance, and minimizes harmful side effects caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone. The risk of cancer can be reduced by supplementing diets with naturally occurring products known as phytochemicals. These phytochemicals have well-defined roles in the management of every stage of breast carcinogenesis. In this review, the collective data of dietary phytochemicals used to sensitize breast cancer cells to therapeutic approaches are reported and their specific molecular targets through synergistic, additive, and potentiation effects are highlighted. The concept of combining natural agents with medicines to augment therapeutic responses creates an optimal modality, which may facilitate clinical applications of combination regimens in the future.

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Combination Irrigant Regimens with MTAD on Two Different Cell Lines.

BACKGROUND: Effective management of smear layer ensures adequate clinical success. Use of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid regimen has been the gold standard with limitations. Commercial irrigants incorporate surface modifiers to address these drawbacks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of combination regimens on target and nontarget cell lines by trypan blue assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonsurfactant combination regimen of chlorhexidine (CHX) and NaOCl (2% CHX + 2.5% NaOCl) and surfactant regimens of CHX with cetrimide (CTR) (2% CHX + 0.5% CTR) and CHX with sodium dodecyl sulfate (2% CHX + 1% SDS) were prepared. 0.9% normal saline (NS) and Biopure MTAD (100%) served as control. Cytotoxicity was evaluated on human gingival fibroblast (HGF) and Henrietta Lacks (HeLa) cell lines by trypan blue assay. Thirty microliter of the cell suspension was treated with 20 µl of irrigants. The cell suspension was loaded into Neubauer chamber after 5 min and cell count was performed under inverted microscope and expressed as viability percentage. RESULTS: Nonsurfactant combination comprising of 2% CHX + 2.5% NaOCl formed a brownish precipitate while surfactant combination regimes were stable without any precipitate formation. NS and 2% CHX + 0.5% CTR had greater viability scores on both cell lines. Two percent CHX + 1% SDS had better viability on HeLa but were severely cytotoxic on HGF. Two percent CHX + 2.5% NaOCl and MTAD were found to be severely cytotoxic on HeLa with limited viability on HGF. CONCLUSION: The variation in data obtained could be possibly attributed to the difference in the cellular membrane composition and mechanism of action of combination regimens. Experimental surfactant regimen 2% CHX + 0.5% CTR shows lower cytotoxicity than MTAD.

Assessment and modelling of antibacterial combination regimens.

BACKGROUND: The increasing global prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria is forcing clinicians to prescribe combination antibiotic regimens to treat serious infections. Currently, the joint activity of a combination is quantified by comparing the observed and expected effects using a reference model. These reference models make different assumptions and interpretations of synergy. They fail to: (i) account for multiple bacterial subpopulations with differing susceptibilities; (ii) quantify or interpret the explicit interaction (synergy/antagonism) mechanisms; and (iii) accommodate spontaneous mutations. AIMS: To develop better study designs, mathematical models, metrics and pharmacodynamic analyses to assist with the identification of highly active combinations that are translatable to the clinical context to address the mounting antibiotic resistance threat. SOURCES: PubMed, references of identified studies and reviews, and personal experience when evidence was lacking. CONTENT: We reviewed metrics and approaches for quantifying the joint activity of the combination. The first example is using experimental data from an in vitro checkerboard synergy panel to develop and illustrate a less model-dependent method for assessing combination regimens. In the second example a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed using mechanism-based mathematical modelling and monotherapy and combination therapy data obtained from an in vitro hollow fibre infection model evaluating linezolid and rifampin regimens against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. IMPLICATIONS: Mechanism-based mathematical approach provides an excellent platform for describing the time course of effect while taking into account the mechanisms of different antibiotics and differing pathogen susceptibilities. This approach allows for the future integration of 'omics' data describing host-pathogen interactions, that will provide a systems-level understanding of the underlying infectious process, and enable the design of effective combination therapies.

Profile of obinutuzumab for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a hematologic malignancy derived from a clonal population of mature B-lymphocytes characterized by relatively low CD20 antigen expression. Although the disease often takes an indolent course, the majority of patients will eventually require therapy. Standard treatment for medically fit patients includes purine analogs and/or alkylating agents in addition to the type I anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab. This therapy is inherently myelosuppressive and can result in significant morbidity and even mortality in patients with impaired performance status due to age and/or medical comorbidities. Historically, treatment options for the elderly or frail patient population were limited to mono-therapy with the oral alkylating agent, chlorambucil, rituximab, or another type I anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab. Recently, a newer-generation anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, obinutuzumab, was developed for patients with CLL. Obinutuzumab is a humanized type II monoclonal antibody that appears to have more direct antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and possibly more direct cytotoxicity in vitro than previously available type I antibodies. A large Phase III prospective randomized clinical trial for older patients with impaired renal function and/or significant medical comorbidities demonstrated that when compared to conventionally-dosed rituximab and chlorambucil, the combination of chlorambucil and obinutuzumab administered at a dose and schedule involving early loading doses improved response rates and progression-free survival without significantly increasing toxicity. Results of this pivotal trial led to the FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) approval of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil for frontline treatment of CLL. Obinutuzumab expands the armamentarium of active and less-toxic targeted agents in the evolving treatment landscape of CLL, providing physicians and patients with an additional therapeutic option.

Temozolomide-based combination for advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: In this systematic review, we explored the value of using temozolomide (TMZ)-based combinations for advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). METHODS: Database search were conducted using the terms 'NENs' and 'TMZ' and 'systemic therapy.' Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival and overall survival, toxicities and tumor response. RESULTS: In total, 16 trials including 348 patients were included. Median progression-free survival ranged from 6 to 31 months. The disease control rate ranged from 65 to 100%. Frequently reported grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia, lymphopenia and elevated transaminases. CONCLUSION: The published clinical data suggest that TMZ-based combination with some anticancer agents (especially capecitabine) could be an effective treatment option for advanced low-intermediate grade NENs.