Atypical and rare cause of myocardial infarction: coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) treated by a carotid-subclavian bypass in a 71-year-old female patient.

BACKGROUND: The coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) is a rare complication after coronary arterial bypass graft operations (CABG) using the left or right internal mammary artery ((L/R)IMA). It results from a retrograde blood flow from the IMA into the subclavian artery (SA) due to a stenosis or occlusion of the SA proximal to the IMA origin. This "steal phenomenon" leads to a decreased blood flow in the IMA and may result in myocardial ischemia (MIS) and even myocardial infarction (MIN). Treatment options include interventional and surgical therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 71-year old woman, who suffered from an acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) 11 years after LIMA-CABG surgery and who was treated successfully with a carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB) after failed interventional therapy. CONCLUSION: CSB may be regarded as a viable treatment option for patients suffering CSSS in the case of MIS and even an acute MIN/NSTEMI, especially in the case of missing or failed interventional therapy attempts. Specialists in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery should be aware of possible CSSS conditions and know about appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic options.

Separating arterial pressure increases and decreases in assessing cardiac baroreflex sensitivity via sequence and bivariate phase-rectified signal averaging techniques.

Cardiac baroreflex (cBR) is activated by both arterial pressure (AP) increases and decreases. Sequence method, a widely utilized tool assessing cBR sensitivity (cBRS) from spontaneous heart period (HP) and systolic AP (SAP) variations, allows the separated computation of cBRS from positive and negative SAP variations. The recently proposed phase-rectified signal averaging (PRSA) method has the same feature but it has been applied so far solely to positive SAP variations. We adapted the PRSA method to compute cBRS over negative SAP variations and we compared the results with those derived from sequence method over two protocols: (i) graded head-up tilt (HUT) at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75° in 19 healthy subjects and (ii) general anesthesia induction in 118 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Regardless of the sign of SAP changes and method, cBRS moved toward 0 during HUT. Only sequence method detected the cBRS decrease after general anesthesia induction. In both protocols, the correlation between the PRSA-based cBRSs derived from positive and negative SAP changes was higher than that obtained from analogous sequence-based cBRSs and correlation between equivalent cBRSs derived from different methods might be absent. We conclude that the two methods are not interchangeable in assessing cBRS. Graphical abstract Graphical representation of the baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) estimation procedures carried out using sequence (SEQ) and phase-rectified signal averaging (PRSA) techniques over spontaneous fluctuations of heart period (HP) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP). BRSSEQ and BRSPRSA was separately computed over positive (+) and negative (-) SAP variations.