Emergency department crowding negatively influences outcomes for adults presenting for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) crowding leads to poor outcomes. Patients with respiratory conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are especially vulnerable to crowding-related delays in care. We aimed to assess the associations of ED crowding metrics with outcomes for patients presenting with COPD. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of adult patients presenting with a diagnosis of COPD to 18 high-volume EDs between 2014 and 2019 in Alberta, Canada. Administrative databases provided date and time data on key stages of the presentation including physician initial assessment and disposition decision. Crowding metrics were calculated using facility-specific median physician initial assessment and length of stay. Patient presentations were grouped by acuity and mixed-effects regression models were fit to adjust for the clustering at the facility level. RESULTS: There were 49,085 presentations for COPD made by 25,734 patients (median age = 73 years). A 1-h increase in the physician initial assessment metric was associated with an increase in physician initial assessment for COPD patients by 23, 53, and 59 min for the high, moderate, and low acuity groups, respectively, adjusted for other predictors. For the low acuity group, this metric was associated with an increased length of stay of 73 min for admitted individuals. Similarly, an increase in the length of stay metric was also associated with an increased likelihood of being admitted for all acuity groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with COPD, ED crowding results in delays in assessment increased length of stay, and increased proportion of patients admitted. These results suggest that ED crowding mitigation efforts to provide timely care for patients with COPD are urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: L'encombrement des services d'urgence entraîne de mauvais résultats. Les patients souffrant de maladies respiratoires telles que la maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique (MPOC) sont particulièrement vulnérables aux retards de soins liés à l'encombrement. Notre avons cherché à évaluer les associations entre les paramètres d'encombrement des services d'urgence et les résultats pour les patients présentant une MPOC. MéTHODES: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte basée sur la population de patients adultes se présentant avec un diagnostic de MPOC dans dix-huit services d'urgence à haut volume entre 2014 et 2019 en Alberta, au Canada. Les bases de données administratives ont fourni des données sur la date et l'heure des principales étapes de la présentation, y compris l'évaluation initiale par le médecin et la décision de sortie. Les mesures d'encombrement ont été calculées à partir de l'évaluation initiale médiane du médecin et de la durée du séjour propres à l'établissement. Les présentations des patients ont été regroupées par gravité et des modèles de régression à effets mixtes ont été ajustés pour tenir compte du regroupement au niveau de l'établissement. RéSULTATS: Il y a eu 49 085 présentations pour la MPOC effectuées par 25 734 patients (âge médian = 73 ans). Une augmentation d'une heure de l'évaluation initiale par le médecin était associée à une augmentation de l'évaluation initiale par le médecin pour les patients atteints de MPOC de 23, 53 et 59 min pour les groupes de gravité élevée, modérée et faible, respectivement, après ajustement pour d'autres facteurs prédictifs. Pour le groupe de faible gravité, ce paramètre était associé à une augmentation de la durée de séjour de 73 min pour les personnes admises. De même, une augmentation de la durée du séjour était également associée à une probabilité accrue d'admission pour tous les groupes de gravité. CONCLUSIONS: Pour les patients atteints de MPOC, l'encombrement des urgences entraîne des retards dans l'évaluation, une augmentation de la durée du séjour et une augmentation de la proportion de patients admis. Ces résultats suggèrent qu'il est urgent d'atténuer l'encombrement des urgences afin de fournir des soins en temps opportun aux patients atteints de MPOC. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'ESSAI: N/A.

Emergency department crowding negatively influences outcomes for adults presenting with asthma: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Access to emergency department (ED) services is important for patients with acute asthma; however, ED crowding may impact the quality of care and compromise outcomes. We examine the association between ED crowding metrics and individual patient outcomes for adults presenting with asthma. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study extracted all ED presentations made by patients aged 18 to 55 years to 18 high-volume EDs in Alberta from April 2014 to March 2019. Physician initial assessment (PIA) time and ED length of stay (LOS) for discharged and admitted patients were calculated. Other metrics and patient outcomes were also obtained. Linear and generalized linear models were fit for continuous and categorical outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models were used for time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS: There were 17,724 ED presentations by 12,569 adults. The median age was 33 years, and females (58.7%) made more presentations. ED crowding affected the PIA time for all triage groups. For the high acuity group (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale [CTAS] 1/2), 1 h increase in median facility-specific PIA was associated with 26 min (95%CI: 24,28) increase; for the moderate acuity (CTAS 3) and low acuity (CTAS 4/5) groups, the individual-level PIA increased by 54 min (95%CI: 53,55) and 61 min (95%CI: 59,63), respectively adjusted by other predictors. Increases in facility PIA resulted in increase in odds of admissions for the high acuity group and increase odds of left without completion of care for the moderate and low acuity groups. CONCLUSION: The care provided for patients from all triage groups was impacted when EDs experienced crowding. Effective interventions are needed to mitigate ED crowding and improve care and outcomes for this important patient group.

Temporal trends in emergency department volumes and crowding metrics in a western Canadian province: a population-based, administrative data study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) crowding is a pervasive problem, yet there have been few comparisons of the extent of, and contributors to, crowding among different types of EDs. The study quantifies and compares crowding metrics for 16 high volume regional, urban and academic EDs in one Canadian province. METHODS: The National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) provided ED presentations by adults to 16 high volume Alberta EDs during April 2010 to March 2015 for this retrospective cohort study. Time to physician initial assessment (PIA), length of stay (LOS) for discharges and admissions were grouped by start hour of presentation and facility. Multiple crowding metrics were created by taking the means, medians (PIA-M, LOS-M), and 90th percentiles of the hourly, ED-specific values. Similarly, proportion left against medical advice (LAMA) and proportion left without being seen (LWBS) were day and ED aggregated. Calculated based on the start of the presentation and the facility and for PIA and LOS. The mean, median, and 90th percentiles for the date and time ED-specific metrics for PIA and LOS were obtained. Summary statistics were used to describe crowding metrics. RESULTS: There were 3,925,457 presentations by 1,420,679 adults. The number of presentations was similar for each sex and the mean age was 46 years. Generally, the three categories of EDs had similar characteristics; however, urban and academic/teaching EDs had more urgent triage scores and a higher percentage of admissions than regional EDs. The median of the PIA-M metric was 1 h23m across all EDs. For discharges, the median of the LOS-M metric was 3h21m whereas the median of the LOS-M metric for admissions was 10h08m. Generally, regional EDs had shorter times than urban and academic/teaching EDs. The median daily LWBS was 3.4% and the median daily LAMA was about 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency presentations have increased over time, and crowding metrics vary considerably among EDs and over the time of day. Academic/teaching EDs generally have higher crowding metrics than other EDs and urgent action is required to mitigate the well-known consequences of ED crowding.