[Electrical storm in patients with Automatic Implantable Defibrillator : A single Center study]. / Orage rythmique chez les patients porteurs de défibrillateurs automatiques implantables : une expérience monocentrique.

BACKGROUND: Electrical storms (ES) are serious cardiac emergencies associated with increased short-term mortality. The true incidence of ES in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is still difficult to estimate because of the heterogeneous definition. The clinical presentation is variable and its management is multidisciplinary. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the epidemiological profile and evolution of a group of patients implanted with an ICD who had electrical storms detected by a home monitoring system. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study, which included 14 patients who were implanted with ICDs, for primary or secondary prevention between 2008 and 2021. All of them were followed by home monitoring. All these patients had an ES detected by home monitoring and authenticated by ECG. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at the time of onset of the electrical storm was 75.4 ± 14.5 years, with extremes ranging from 49 to 101 years. Most of patients (n = 11) were male. The majority of them had underlying ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n = 12). In a third of cases (n = 5) patients were implanted for secondary prevention. The electrical storm was related to recurrent episodes of VT. No cases of VF were detected. Syncope was the most frequent clinical presentation (four patients). Nine patients received internal shocks, with an average of four shocks per patient. The triggering factor was myocardial ischaemia in four cases. Majority of patients were managed in the cardiac intensive care unit. Two patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. In addition to anti-arrhythmic treatment with amiodarone and beta blockers. Nine patients underwent ablation of ventricular tachycardia focus. Mortality was high (in half of the cases) mainly due to a cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSION: This study shows that OR remain rare, but are still associated with high mortality. Home monitoring makes it possible to manage them earlier.

Adherence to diagnostic and therapeutic practice guidelines for suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections.

BACKGROUND: Despite guidelines describing the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for patients with suspected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections, their management is often challenging. AIMS: To describe our diagnostic and therapeutic practices for suspected CIED infection, and to compare them with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) guidelines. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in the tertiary care Nancy University Hospital for suspected CIED infection from 2014 to 2019 were included retrospectively. We applied the EHRA classification of CIED infection, and compared diagnostic and therapeutic management with the EHRA guidelines. RESULTS: Among 184 patients (mean age 72.3±12.4 years), 137 had a proven infection of the lead (by transthoracic echocardiography/transoesophageal echocardiography, 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography or positive culture of the lead) or an isolated pocket infection without proof of lead infection, and 47 had no proof of CIED infection. According to the EHRA classification, CIED infection was considered as definite in 145 patients and possible in 31 and was excluded in eight patients. Regarding recommended diagnostic procedures, blood cultures were performed in 90.8%, transthoracic echocardiography in 97.8%, transoesophageal echocardiography in 85.9%, 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in 50.5% and imaging for embolisms in 78.3% of the patients. Compared with therapeutic recommendations for the 145 cases of definite CIED infection, device removal was performed in 96 patients (66.2%) and antibiotic therapy was prescribed in 130 (89.7%), with a duration equal to or longer than that recommended in 105 (72.4%) of the patients. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the difficulties in following theoretical guidelines in daily practice, where both technical and human considerations interfere with their strict appliance.

[Home monitoring follow-up of implantable cardiac defibrillators and stimulators : Current situation in France and possible future after ETAPESprogram]. / Télésurveillance des stimulateurs et défibrillateurs cardiaques : état des lieux en France et perspectives après le programme ETAPES.

Home monitoring follow-up is part of the routine follow-up of the majority of implantable cardiac defibrillators, and is increasing regarding pacemakers follow-up. This article reviews history, guidelines and legislation for home monitoring follow-up of implantable cardiac devices, and discusses its evolution after ETAPES program.

Impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients followed by remote monitoring.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a fast-growing worldwide pandemic. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias among a large French cohort of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients over the first 5 months of 2020. METHODS: Five thousand nine hundred and fifty-four implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients were followed by remote monitoring during the COVID-19 period (from 01 January to 31 May 2020). Data were obtained from automated remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators utilizing the Implicity® platform. For all patients, the type of arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation), the number of ventricular arrhythmia episodes and the type of implantable cardioverter defibrillator-delivered therapy were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 472 (7.9%) patients presented 4917 ventricular arrhythmia events. An increase in ventricular arrhythmia incidence was observed after the first COVID-19 case in France, and especially during weeks #10 and #11, at the time of major governmental measures, with an increase in the incidence of antitachycardia pacing delivered therapy. During the 11 weeks before the lockdown order, the curve of the percentage of live-stream television coverage of COVID-19 information matched the ventricular arrhythmia incidence. During the lockdown, the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia decreased significantly compared with baseline (0.05±0.7 vs. 0.09±1.2 episodes per patient per week, respectively; P<0.001). Importantly, no correlation was observed between ventricular arrhythmia incidence and the curve of COVID-19 incidence. No changes were observed regarding atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia episodes over time. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in ventricular arrhythmia incidence was observed in the 2 weeks before the lockdown order, at the time of major governmental measures. Ventricular arrhythmia incidence decreased dramatically during the lockdown.

Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients according to atrial fibrillation is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used, including all ICD recipients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation from 2002 to 2016. Patients with atrial fibrillation were compared to those without atrial fibrillation. The primary endpoint was first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at 5 years. Secondary endpoints comprised recurrences of ICD-related therapies, first cardiac rehospitalization and all-cause mortality at 5 years. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-matching analyses were applied. RESULTS: A total of 592 consecutive ICD recipients were included (33% with atrial fibrillation). Atrial fibrillation was associated with reduced freedom from recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (42% vs. 50%, log-rank P=0.004; hazard ratio 1.445, 95% confidence interval 1.124-1.858), mainly attributable to recurrent ventricular fibrillation in secondary-preventive ICD recipients. Accordingly, atrial fibrillation was associated with reduced freedom from first appropriate ICD therapies (31% vs. 42%, log-rank P=0.001; hazard ratio 1.598, 95% confidence interval 1.206-2.118). Notably, the primary endpoint of freedom from first episode of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias was still reduced in those with atrial fibrillation compared to those without atrial fibrillation after propensity score matching. Regarding secondary endpoints, patients with atrial fibrillation still showed a trend towards reduced freedom from appropriate ICD therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation was associated with increased rates of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate device therapies in ICD recipients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Management and outcomes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young adults.

BACKGROUND: Management of young adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is challenging. AIMS: To evaluate the profile of young adults (16-25 years) with HCM included in the French prospective HCM registry. METHODS: Patients were compared according to occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), comprising sudden cardiac death (SCD) events (implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] discharge, SCD, sustained ventricular tachycardia), atrial fibrillation/embolic stroke, heart failure hospitalisation and unexplained syncope, at a mean follow-up of 4.4±2.2 years. RESULTS: At baseline, among 61 patients (20.5±3.0 years; 16 women, 26.2%), 13 (21.3%) had a prophylactic ICD, 24.6% a family history of SCD, 29.5% obstruction, 86.0% magnetic resonance imaging myocardial fibrosis, 11.8% abnormal exercise blood pressure and 52.8% a European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 5-year SCD score<4% (24.5%≥6%). At follow-up, 15 patients (24.6%; seven women; all with fibrosis) presented 17 MACE, comprising: SCD events (n=7, 41.2%; including three patients with an ICD, five with at least one SCD major classical risk factor and an ESC score≥5% and two with no risk factors and an ESC score<4%); atrial fibrillation/stroke (n=6, 35.3%); heart failure (n=1, 5.9%); syncope (n=3, 17.6%). An ICD was implanted in 11 patients (four for secondary prevention), but in only 61.5% of patients with a score≥6%. Only obstruction significantly increased MACE risk (odds ratio 3.96; P=0.035), with a non-significant trend towards a lower risk in men (OR 0.29; P=0.065). CONCLUSIONS: In young adults with HCM, MACE are common in the short term, especially in obstructive HCM and women, mostly arrhythmic in origin. Prophylactic ICD implantation is frequent and does not strictly follow the guidelines, while the use of European/USA guidelines is helpful but imperfect in identifying SCD risk.

Usefulness of remote monitoring for the early detection of back-up mode in implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Reversion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to back-up mode degrades the operating capabilities of the device, puts patients at risk and requires rapid intervention by a manufacturer's technician. AIM: To illustrate the usefulness of remote monitoring of ICDs for the early detection of reversion to back-up mode. METHODS: In our centre, all patients implanted with an ICD, with or without resynchronisation, were offered remote monitoring as soon as the technology became available. Alerts triggered by the remote monitoring system were included prospectively in a register. During a mean follow-up of 5.7±1.3 years, a total of 1594 patients with an ICD (441 with resynchronisation function) followed with remote monitoring were included in the register. RESULTS: Among 15,874 alerts, only 10 were related to a reversion to back-up mode. Among those, seven reversions were caused by radiotherapy, two were fake events and one was caused by magnetic resonance imaging. Except for the two fake events, the eight other patients had an emergency admission for the resetting and reprogramming of their ICD. None of the reversion to back-up mode alerts was followed by a clinical alert (i.e. a shock alert) before the ICD problem was resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Reversion to back-up mode is a very rare event, accounting for 0.06% of total alerts; remote monitoring facilitates the early detection of this critical event to resolve the problem faster than the next scheduled follow-up. Remote monitoring can prevent serious damage to the patient and avoids systematic ambulatory control of the ICD after each radiotherapy session.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in the real world: Main findings from the French multicentre DAI-PP programme (pilot phase).

This review summarizes the main findings of the French multicentre DAI-PP pilot programme, and discusses the related clinical and research perspectives. This project included retrospectively (2002-2012 period) more than 5000 subjects with structural heart disease who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, and were followed for a mean period of 3 years. The pilot phase of the DAI-PP programme has provided valuable information on several practical and clinically relevant aspects of primary prevention ICD implantation in the real-world population, which are summarized in this review. This pilot has led to a prospective evaluation that started in May 2018, assessing ICD therapy in primary and secondary prevention in patients with structural and electrical heart diseases, with remote monitoring follow-up using a dedicated platform. This should further enhance our understanding of sudden cardiac death, to eventually optimize the field of preventative actions.

[Twenty years later A story of intra-thoracic textiloma]. / Vingt ans après Histoire d'un textilome intra-thoracique.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathoracic textiloma is a rare complication possibly leading to misdiagnosis. It could present as haemoptysis, lung abscess, pseudo-tumour or a chronic cough. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old patient with a history of multiple cardiac problems and needing long-term anticoagulation, complained since 2007 of recurrent haemoptysis of increasing abundance, the etiological investigation of which was negative. A thoracic CT-scan revealed a lesion in the lingula in contact with the pericardial plates of an implanted automatic defibrillator dating from 1989. In 2016, after two failures of arterial embolization, a diagnostic and therapeutic surgical exploration was undertaken on this patient who was a high operative risk. A segmental resection revealed an intra-pulmonary textiloma on pathological examination. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of intrathoracic textiloma remains rare and its late presentation is non specific. Radiological imaging with a CT-scan and/or MRI could lead to the diagnosis. Surgery remains the reference treatment for the diagnosis and cure of intrathoracic textiloma with pathological examination, essential for confirmation. A means of prevention has to be developed because swab count is not totally reliable.

Prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention: From implantation to heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The frequency, characteristics and outcomes of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients who eventually undergo heart transplantation (HT) during follow-up have not been well described. AIMS: In a cohort of patients with heart failure implanted with an ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, to identify those at high risk of subsequent HT and evaluate ICD usefulness. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2012, 5539 patients received a primary prevention ICD across 12 centers, and were enrolled in the DAI-PP programme, including 5427 with full HT information available. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 1024 days (interquartile range 484-1702 days), 176 (3.2%) patients underwent HT. Median duration between ICD implantation and HT was 484 days (IQR 169-1117 days). Among those aged≤65 years (theoretical age limit for HT registration in France), the overall incidence per 1000 person-years was 18.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.32-20.74). Left ventricular ejection fraction<25% (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.43, 95% CI: 2.34-5.04; P<0.0001), younger age (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96; P<0.0001), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV (HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.79-4.00; P<0.0001) and no cardiac resynchronization therapy (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.39-3.14; P=0.0004) were independently associated with HT. Patients with these three characteristics (excluding age) had a 1-year HT rate of 15.2%. Incidence of appropriate ICD therapies was 92.7 per 1000 person-years for patients who underwent HT versus 76.1 for those who did not (P=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of HT in this primary prevention population was relatively high, especially among young patients with a very low ejection fraction, an advanced NYHA class and were unsuitable for cardiac resynchronization therapy (up to 15% annually). Patients awaiting HT experienced a significant rate of appropriate ICD therapies, reinforcing the importance of specific cardiac rhythm management in these patients.

Ten-year outcomes of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

BACKGROUND: Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT) is common in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), and is associated with sudden cardiac death. Management of MVT is not defined, and results of catheter ablation (CA) are limited. AIMS: To evaluate long-term outcomes of MVT CA in repaired TOF. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (mean age 32±10.3 years; 59% male) with repaired TOF underwent CA for symptomatic MVT between 1990 and 2012 in our centre; direct-current ablation (DCA) was used in 6%, radiofrequency followed by DCA in 29% and radiofrequency alone in 65%. RESULTS: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was present in 35% and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in 21%. Mean numbers of clinical and induced MVTs were 1 and 2, respectively. Mean VT rate was 225±95bpm. Ablation targeted a single site (range 1-2), which was RV outflow tract in 85%. Primary success, defined as ventricular tachycardia (VT) termination during CA and final non-inducibility, was obtained in 82%. Seven patients (21%) required redo ablation in the first 3 months (before 2004; DCA). No death related to CA occurred. Mean follow-up time was 9.5±5.2 years. Antiarrhythmic therapy was discontinued in 71%. There were two cases of sudden cardiac death and four VT recurrences. Freedom from death and arrhythmia recurrence was 94% at 5 years, 81% at 10 years and 70% at 20 years. Global survival was 91% at 20 years. Baseline LV ejection fraction<60% was significantly associated with ventricular arrhythmia recurrence (hazard ratio 16.4, 95% confidence interval 1.8-147; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CA can safely address macroreentrant MVT in repaired TOF patients with an acceptable long-term rate of recurrence in this high-risk population. Anatomical classification of isthmuses with electroanatomical mapping provides reproducible endpoints for CA. Attention should be given to LV systolic function in risk assessment and selection of candidates for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Position paper for management of elderly patients with pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators: Groupe de Rythmologie et Stimulation Cardiaque de la Société Française de Cardiologie and Société Française de Gériatrie et Gérontologie.

Despite the increasingly high rate of implantation of pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in elderly patients, data supporting their clinical and cost-effectiveness in this age stratum are ambiguous and contradictory. We reviewed the data regarding the applicability, safety and effectiveness of conventional pacing, ICDs and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in elderly patients. Although periprocedural risk may be slightly higher in the elderly, the implantation procedure for PMs and ICDs is still relatively safe in this age group. In older patients with sinus node disease, the general consensus is that DDD pacing with the programming of an algorithm to minimize ventricular pacing is preferred. In very old patients presenting with intermittent or suspected atrioventricular block, VVI pacing may be appropriate. In terms of correcting potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, the effectiveness of ICD therapy is similar in older and younger individuals. However, the assumption of persistent ICD benefit in the elderly population is questionable, as any advantageous effect of the device on arrhythmic death may be attenuated by higher total non-arrhythmic mortality. While septuagenarians and octogenarians have higher annual all-cause mortality rates, ICD therapy may remain effective in selected patients at high risk of arrhythmic death and with minimum comorbidities despite advanced age. ICD implantation among the elderly, as a group, may not be cost-effective, but the procedure may reach cost-effectiveness in those expected to live more than 5-7years after implantation. Elderly patients usually experience significant functional improvement after CRT, similar to that observed in middle-aged patients. Management of CRT non-responders remains globally the same, while considering a less aggressive approach in terms of reinterventions (revision of left ventricular [LV] lead placement, addition of a right ventricular or LV lead, LV endocardial pacing configuration). Overall, physiological age, general status and comorbidities rather than chronological age per se should be the decisive factors in making a decision about device implantation selection for survival and well-being benefit in elderly patients.

Long-term outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients who receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for purely secondary prevention indications. AIMS: To assess the rates and predictors of appropriate therapies over a very long-term follow-up period in this population. METHODS: Between June 2003 and August 2006, 239 consecutive patients with structural left ventricular disease and a secondary prophylaxis indication for ICD therapy (survivors of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias) were prospectively enrolled. An extended follow-up of these patients was carried out. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of appropriate device therapy. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, electrical storm and inappropriate therapy. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 239 patients (90% men; mean age 64±12 years; 72% ischaemic cardiomyopathy; left ventricular ejection fraction 37±12%). During a median follow-up of 7.8 (3.5-9.3) years, appropriate device therapy occurred in 139 (58.2%) patients. Death occurred in 141 patients (59%), electrical storm in 73 (30.5%) and inappropriate therapy in 42 (17.6%). Multivariable analysis identified patients whose presenting arrhythmia was ventricular fibrillation as being less likely to require appropriate device therapy than those whose presenting arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia (sub-hazard ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.97; P=0.04). Independent predictors of all-cause death were age at implantation (P<0.0001), wide QRS complexes (P=0.024), creatinine concentration (P=0.0002) and B-type natriuretic peptide at implantation (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Secondary prevention ICD recipients exhibit a high risk of appropriate device therapy and death over prolonged follow-up. Patients who presented initially with ventricular fibrillation were less likely to require the delivery of appropriate device therapy.

[Fatal surgical extraction of cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator leads in a context of endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. A case report and review of literature]. / Extraction chirurgicale fatale de sondes de défibrillateur cardiaque triple chambre dans un contexte d'endocardite à Staphylococcus epidermidis méthicilline-résistant. À propos d'un cas et revue de la littérature.

A 82-year-old man equipped with a cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator for dilated cardiomyopathy with normal coronary arteries, in complete atrioventricular block, develops six months after a change of the generator-pocket a severe endocarditis due to a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis with a large lead vegetation. After 4 days of adapted antimicrobial therapy, a surgical device removal is realised with unfortunately a fatal end during extraction. This observation points out the severity of cardiovascular device infections in old and weak population, as well as the difficulty of treatment choices because of both infectious and rhythmic constraints. The lead extraction is a strong recommendation but the modality and timing of extraction are not consensual, especially in cardioverter defibrillator-dependent patients. Surgical removal remains an alternative to percutaneous lead extraction but with a higher operative risk.

[Sudden cardiac death in the youth. Is the new subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator S-ICD an alternative solution?]. / Mort subite du sujet jeune : le défibrillateur sous-cutané S-ICD est-il une solution alternative aux défibrillateurs conventionnels ?

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is well-recognized therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death. Classic ICD need the use of permanent endocavitary leads, which may cause serious troubles (lead dislodgement, ventricular perforation, lead infections, etc.). The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is a new device provided by only a subcutaneous lead. It has been developed for the last five years and it is becoming at present a real alternative to classic ICD. We report a clinical case of a 34 y.o. woman who presented a sudden cardiac death and who benefited the implantation of this new technology. This paper deals with the potential indications, usefulness benefits, and problems of the S-ICD.

[Diagnosis and treatment of spastic angina revealed by cardiac arrest]. / Mort subite et angor spastique: quelle stratégie diagnostique et thérapeutique?

The prevalence of vasospastic angina is said to be low in Europe, but maybe because of a lack of diagnosis in the daily practice. However, coronary spasm is a common cause of cardiac arrest, especially among patients free of cardiac illness, and it should be systematically investigated after an unexplained cardiac arrest. Intracoronary spasm provocation test exposes patients to a lower risk compared to the risk of spontaneous spastic angina. Accurate modalities and diagnostic criteria have to be clarified for European population. Avoiding external causes of coronary spasm (such as cigarette smoking or more generally consuming coronary spasm inducing drugs) and prescribing antispastic medicine (first of all calcium channel blockers) are the basis of vasospastic angina treatment. However, recurrent coronary spasms have been reported despite an appropriate treatment and implantable automatic defibrillator has been implanted after case discussion when the onset of illness was cardiac arrest. We report the case of a patient recovering from cardiac arrest who had a positive spasm coronary provocation test, and was treated with calcium channel blockers and had been an automatic defibrillator implanted, with a coronary spasm provocation test performed afterward still contentious. While discussing this case, we are making a literature review of the diagnosis and treatment of spastic angina revealed by cardiac arrest.

Remote monitoring of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: can results from large clinical trials be transposed to clinical practice?

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) is increasingly used to follow up patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Randomized control trials provide evidence for the benefit of this intervention, but data for RM in daily clinical practice with multiple-brands and unselected patients is lacking. AIMS: To assess the effect of RM on patient management and clinical outcome for recipients of ICDs in daily practice. METHODS: We reviewed ICD recipients followed up at our institution in 2009 with RM or with traditional hospital only (HO) follow-up. We looked at the effect of RM on the number of scheduled ambulatory follow-ups and urgent unscheduled consultations, the time between onset of asymptomatic events to clinical intervention and the clinical effectiveness of all consultations. We also evaluated the proportion of RM notifications representing clinically relevant situations. RESULTS: We included 355 patients retrospectively (RM: n=144, HO: n=211, 76.9% male, 60.3±15.2 years old, 50.1% with ICDs for primary prevention and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 35.5±14.5%). Average follow-up was 13.5 months. The RM group required less scheduled ambulatory follow-up consultations (1.8 vs. 2.1/patient/year; P<0.0001) and a far lower median time between the onset of asymptomatic events and clinical intervention (7 vs. 76 days; P=0.016). Of the 784 scheduled ambulatory follow-up consultations carried out, only 152 (19.4%) resulted in therapeutic intervention or ICD reprogramming. We also found that the vast majority of RM notifications (61.9%) were of no clinical relevance. CONCLUSION: RM allows early management of asymptomatic events and a reduction in scheduled ambulatory follow-up consultations in daily clinical practice, without compromising safety, endorsing RM as the new standard of care for ICD recipients.

Role of patient education in the perception and acceptance of home monitoring after recent implantation of cardioverter defibrillators: the EDUCAT study.

BACKGROUND: Much attention is being paid to the education of and provision of medical information to patients, to optimize their understanding and acceptance of their disease. AIMS: To ascertain the impact of educating recent recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) on their perception and acceptance of a home monitoring (HM) system. METHODS: Questionnaire 1, completed one month after ICD implantation, was designed to assess: the quality of patient preparation for HM; patient comprehension of HM; and patient anxiety experienced during its installation. The comprehension questions were assigned a score of -2 for an incorrect answer, +1 for a correct answer and 0 for neither (total score ranging from -40 to +20). Questionnaire 2, completed six months after ICD implantation, assessed patient acceptance of and anxiety about HM. RESULTS: The registry included 571 patients (mean age 63.9±12.8 years; 83% men; 76% of ICDs implanted for primary prevention) followed by HM for 6.2±1.2 months. Questionnaire 1 was completed by 430 (75.3%) patients and questionnaire 2 by 398 (69.7%) patients. Younger patients had a better comprehension of HM than older patients. High-quality training conditions improved the comprehension score, and a positive association was observed between anxiety and acceptance levels and the comprehension score. The 80±20% mean data transmission rate (days of transmission/days of follow-up ratio) was unrelated to the comprehension scores. CONCLUSION: A clear understanding was associated with a higher acceptance of HM, although it was unrelated to the data transmission rate.