Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 2 (Tdp2) repairs DNA-protein crosslinks and protects against double strand breaks in vivo.

DNA-protein crosslinks pose a significant challenge to genome stability and cell viability. Efficient repair of DPCs is crucial for preserving genomic integrity and preventing the accumulation of DNA damage. Despite recent advances in our understanding of DPC repair, many aspects of this process, especially at the organismal level, remain elusive. In this study, we used zebrafish as a model organism to investigate the role of TDP2 (Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 2) in DPC repair. We characterized the two tdp2 orthologs in zebrafish using phylogenetic, syntenic and expression analysis and investigated the phenotypic consequences of tdp2 silencing in zebrafish embryos. We then quantified the effects of tdp2a and tdp2b silencing on cellular DPC levels and DSB accumulation in zebrafish embryos. Our findings revealed that tdp2b is the main ortholog during embryonic development, while both orthologs are ubiquitously present in adult tissues. Notably, the tdp2b ortholog is phylogenetically closer to human TDP2. Silencing of tdp2b, but not tdp2a, resulted in the loss of Tdp2 activity in zebrafish embryos, accompanied by the accumulation of DPCs and DSBs. Our findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of DPC repair at the organismal level and underscore the significance of TDP2 in maintaining genome stability.

Exposure of Arabidopsis thaliana Mutants to Genotoxic Stress Provides New Insights for the Involvement of TDP1α and TDP1ß genes in DNA-Damage Response.

Genotoxic stress activates the DNA-damage response (DDR) signalling cascades responsible for maintaining genome integrity. Downstream DNA repair pathways include the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) enzyme that hydrolyses the phosphodiester bond between the tyrosine of topoisomerase I (TopI) and 3'-phosphate of DNA. The plant TDP1 subfamily contains the canonical TDP1α gene and the TDP1ß gene whose functions are not fully elucidated. The current study proposes to investigate the involvement of TDP1 genes in DDR-related processes by using Arabidopsis thaliana mutants treated with genotoxic agents. The phenotypic and molecular characterization of tdp1α, tdp1ß and tdp1α/ß mutants treated with cisplatin (CIS), curcumin (CUR), NSC120686 (NSC), zeocin (ZEO), and camptothecin (CPT), evidenced that while tdp1ß was highly sensitive to CIS and CPT, tdp1α was more sensitive to NSC. Gene expression analyses showing upregulation of the TDP2 gene in the double mutant indicate the presence of compensatory mechanisms. The downregulation of POL2A gene in the tdp1ß mutant along with the upregulation of the TDP1ß gene in pol2a mutants, together with its sensitivity to replication inhibitors (CIS, CTP), point towards a function of this gene in the response to replication stress. Therefore, this study brings novel information relative to the activity of TDP1 genes in plants.

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 has major impact in prevention of suicidal covalent DNA-protein crosslink with apurinic/apyrimidinic site in cellular extracts.

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPC) are common DNA lesions induced by various external and endogenous agents. One of the sources of DPC is the apurinic/apyrimidinic site (AP site) and proteins interacting with it. Some proteins possessing AP lyase activity form covalent complexes with AP site-containing DNA without borohydride reduction (suicidal crosslinks). We have shown earlier that tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) but not AP endonuclease 1 (APE1) is able to remove intact OGG1 from protein-DNA adducts, whereas APE1 is able to prevent the formation of DPC by hydrolyzing the AP site. Here we demonstrate that TDP1 can remove intact PARP2 but not XRCC1 from covalent enzyme-DNA adducts with AP-DNA formed in the absence of APE1. We also analyzed an impact of APE1 and TDP1 on the efficiency of DPC formation in APE1-/- or TDP1-/- cell extracts. Our data revealed that APE1 depletion leads to increased levels of PARP1-DNA crosslinks, whereas TDP1 deficiency has little effect on DPC formation.

Decitabine cytotoxicity is promoted by dCMP deaminase DCTD and mitigated by SUMO-dependent E3 ligase TOPORS.

The nucleoside analogue decitabine (or 5-aza-dC) is used to treat several haematological cancers. Upon its triphosphorylation and incorporation into DNA, 5-aza-dC induces covalent DNA methyltransferase 1 DNA-protein crosslinks (DNMT1-DPCs), leading to DNA hypomethylation. However, 5-aza-dC's clinical outcomes vary, and relapse is common. Using genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 screens, we map factors determining 5-aza-dC sensitivity. Unexpectedly, we find that loss of the dCMP deaminase DCTD causes 5-aza-dC resistance, suggesting that 5-aza-dUMP generation is cytotoxic. Combining results from a subsequent genetic screen in DCTD-deficient cells with the identification of the DNMT1-DPC-proximal proteome, we uncover the ubiquitin and SUMO1 E3 ligase, TOPORS, as a new DPC repair factor. TOPORS is recruited to SUMOylated DNMT1-DPCs and promotes their degradation. Our study suggests that 5-aza-dC-induced DPCs cause cytotoxicity when DPC repair is compromised, while cytotoxicity in wild-type cells arises from perturbed nucleotide metabolism, potentially laying the foundations for future identification of predictive biomarkers for decitabine treatment.

Mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) has 5'-deoxyribose phosphate lyase activity in vitro.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plays a key role in mitochondrial and cellular functions. mtDNA is maintained by active DNA turnover and base excision repair (BER). In BER, one of the toxic repair intermediates is 5'-deoxyribose phosphate (5'dRp). Human mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ has weak dRp lyase activities, and another known dRp lyase in the nucleus, human DNA polymerase ß, can also localize to mitochondria in certain cell and tissue types. Nonetheless, whether additional proteins have the ability to remove 5'dRp in mitochondria remains unknown. Our prior work on the AP lyase activity of mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) has prompted us to examine its ability to remove 5'dRp residues in vitro. TFAM is the primary DNA-packaging factor in human mitochondria and interacts with mitochondrial DNA extensively. Our data demonstrate that TFAM has the dRp lyase activity with different DNA substrates. Under single-turnover conditions, TFAM removes 5'dRp residues at a rate comparable to that of DNA polymerase (pol) ß, albeit slower than that of pol λ. Among the three proteins examined, pol λ shows the highest single-turnover rates in dRp lyase reactions. The catalytic effect of TFAM is facilitated by lysine residues of TFAM via Schiff base chemistry, as evidenced by the observation of dRp-lysine adducts in mass spectrometry experiments. The catalytic effect of TFAM observed here is analogous to the AP lyase activity of TFAM reported previously. Together, these results suggest a potential role of TFAM in preventing the accumulation of toxic DNA repair intermediates.

5-Formylcytosine mediated DNA-peptide cross-link induces predominantly semi-targeted mutations in both Escherichia coli and human cells.

Histone proteins can become trapped on DNA in the presence of 5-formylcytosine (5fC) to form toxic DNA-protein conjugates. Their repair may involve proteolytic digestion resulting in DNA-peptide cross-links (DpCs). Here, we have investigated replication of a model DpC comprised of an 11-mer peptide (NH2-GGGKGLGK∗GGA) containing an oxy-lysine residue (K∗) conjugated to 5fC in DNA. Both CXG and CXT (where X = 5fC-DpC) sequence contexts were examined. Replication of both constructs gave low viability (<10%) in Escherichia coli, whereas TLS efficiency was high (72%) in HEK 293T cells. In E. coli, the DpC was bypassed largely error-free, inducing only 2 to 3% mutations, which increased to 4 to 5% with SOS. For both sequences, semi-targeted mutations were dominant, and for CXG, the predominant mutations were G→T and G→C at the 3'-base to the 5fC-DpC. In HEK 293T cells, 7 to 9% mutations occurred, and the dominant mutations were the semi-targeted G → T for CXG and T → G for CXT. These mutations were reduced drastically in cells deficient in hPol η, hPol ι or hPol ζ, suggesting a role of these TLS polymerases in mutagenic TLS. Steady-state kinetics studies using hPol η confirmed that this polymerase induces G → T and T → G transversions at the base immediately 3' to the DpC. This study reveals a unique replication pattern of 5fC-conjugated DpCs, which are bypassed largely error-free in both E. coli and human cells and induce mostly semi-targeted mutations at the 3' position to the lesion.

Visualizing the dynamics of DNA replication and repair at the single-molecule level.

During cell division, the genome of each eukaryotic cell is copied by thousands of replisomes-large protein complexes consisting of several dozen proteins. Recent studies suggest that the eukaryotic replisome is much more dynamic than previously thought. To directly visualize replisome dynamics in a physiological context, we recently developed a single-molecule approach for imaging replication proteins in Xenopus egg extracts. These extracts contain all the soluble nuclear proteins and faithfully recapitulate DNA replication and repair in vitro, serving as a powerful platform for studying the mechanisms of genome maintenance. Here we present detailed protocols for conducting single-molecule experiments in nuclear egg extracts and preparing key reagents. This workflow can be easily adapted to visualize the dynamics and function of other proteins implicated in DNA replication and repair.

Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) and SPRTN protease repair histone 3 and topoisomerase 1 DNA-protein crosslinks in vivo.

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) are frequent and damaging DNA lesions that affect all DNA transactions, which in turn can lead to the formation of double-strand breaks, genomic instability and cell death. At the organismal level, impaired DPC repair (DPCR) is associated with cancer, ageing and neurodegeneration. Despite the severe consequences of DPCs, little is known about the processes underlying repair pathways at the organism level. SPRTN is a protease that removes most cellular DPCs during replication, whereas tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 repairs one of the most abundant enzymatic DPCs, topoisomerase 1-DPC (TOP1-DPC). How these two enzymes repair DPCs at the organism level is currently unknown. We perform phylogenetic, syntenic, structural and expression analysis to compare tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) orthologues between human, mouse and zebrafish. Using the zebrafish animal model and human cells, we demonstrate that TDP1 and SPRTN repair endogenous, camptothecin- and formaldehyde-induced DPCs, including histone H3- and TOP1-DPCs. We show that resolution of H3-DNA crosslinks depends on upstream proteolysis by SPRTN and subsequent peptide removal by TDP1 in RPE1 cells and zebrafish embryos, whereas SPRTN and TDP1 function in different pathways in the repair of endogenous TOP1-DPCs and total DPCs. Furthermore, we have found increased TDP2 expression in TDP1-deficient cells and embryos. Understanding the role of TDP1 in DPCR at the cellular and organismal levels could provide an impetus for the development of new drugs and combination therapies with TOP1-DPC inducing drugs.

A non-proteolytic release mechanism for HMCES-DNA-protein crosslinks.

The conserved protein HMCES crosslinks to abasic (AP) sites in ssDNA to prevent strand scission and the formation of toxic dsDNA breaks during replication. Here, we report a non-proteolytic release mechanism for HMCES-DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs), which is regulated by DNA context. In ssDNA and at ssDNA-dsDNA junctions, HMCES-DPCs are stable, which efficiently protects AP sites against spontaneous incisions or cleavage by APE1 endonuclease. In contrast, HMCES-DPCs are released in dsDNA, allowing APE1 to initiate downstream repair. Mechanistically, we show that release is governed by two components. First, a conserved glutamate residue, within HMCES' active site, catalyses reversal of the crosslink. Second, affinity to the underlying DNA structure determines whether HMCES re-crosslinks or dissociates. Our study reveals that the protective role of HMCES-DPCs involves their controlled release upon bypass by replication forks, which restricts DPC formation to a necessary minimum.

MUS81 cleaves TOP1-derived lesions and other DNA-protein cross-links.

BACKGROUND: DNA-protein cross-links (DPCs) are one of the most deleterious DNA lesions, originating from various sources, including enzymatic activity. For instance, topoisomerases, which play a fundamental role in DNA metabolic processes such as replication and transcription, can be trapped and remain covalently bound to DNA in the presence of poisons or nearby DNA damage. Given the complexity of individual DPCs, numerous repair pathways have been described. The protein tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (Tdp1) has been demonstrated to be responsible for removing topoisomerase 1 (Top1). Nevertheless, studies in budding yeast have indicated that alternative pathways involving Mus81, a structure-specific DNA endonuclease, could also remove Top1 and other DPCs. RESULTS: This study shows that MUS81 can efficiently cleave various DNA substrates modified by fluorescein, streptavidin or proteolytically processed topoisomerase. Furthermore, the inability of MUS81 to cleave substrates bearing native TOP1 suggests that TOP1 must be either dislodged or partially degraded prior to MUS81 cleavage. We demonstrated that MUS81 could cleave a model DPC in nuclear extracts and that depletion of TDP1 in MUS81-KO cells induces sensitivity to the TOP1 poison camptothecin (CPT) and affects cell proliferation. This sensitivity is only partially suppressed by TOP1 depletion, indicating that other DPCs might require the MUS81 activity for cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that MUS81 and TDP1 play independent roles in the repair of CPT-induced lesions, thus representing new therapeutic targets for cancer cell sensitisation in combination with TOP1 inhibitors.

Compartmentalization of the SUMO/RNF4 pathway by SLX4 drives DNA repair.

SLX4, disabled in the Fanconi anemia group P, is a scaffolding protein that coordinates the action of structure-specific endonucleases and other proteins involved in the replication-coupled repair of DNA interstrand cross-links. Here, we show that SLX4 dimerization and SUMO-SIM interactions drive the assembly of SLX4 membraneless compartments in the nucleus called condensates. Super-resolution microscopy reveals that SLX4 forms chromatin-bound clusters of nanocondensates. We report that SLX4 compartmentalizes the SUMO-RNF4 signaling pathway. SENP6 and RNF4 regulate the assembly and disassembly of SLX4 condensates, respectively. SLX4 condensation per se triggers the selective modification of proteins by SUMO and ubiquitin. Specifically, SLX4 condensation induces ubiquitylation and chromatin extraction of topoisomerase 1 DNA-protein cross-links. SLX4 condensation also induces the nucleolytic degradation of newly replicated DNA. We propose that the compartmentalization of proteins by SLX4 through site-specific interactions ensures the spatiotemporal control of protein modifications and nucleolytic reactions during DNA repair.

Mechanism and function of DNA replication-independent DNA-protein crosslink repair via the SUMO-RNF4 pathway.

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) obstruct essential DNA transactions, posing a serious threat to genome stability and functionality. DPCs are proteolytically processed in a ubiquitin- and DNA replication-dependent manner by SPRTN and the proteasome but can also be resolved via targeted SUMOylation. However, the mechanistic basis of SUMO-mediated DPC resolution and its interplay with replication-coupled DPC repair remain unclear. Here, we show that the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase RNF4 defines a major pathway for ubiquitylation and proteasomal clearance of SUMOylated DPCs in the absence of DNA replication. Importantly, SUMO modifications of DPCs neither stimulate nor inhibit their rapid DNA replication-coupled proteolysis. Instead, DPC SUMOylation provides a critical salvage mechanism to remove DPCs formed after DNA replication, as DPCs on duplex DNA do not activate interphase DNA damage checkpoints. Consequently, in the absence of the SUMO-RNF4 pathway cells are able to enter mitosis with a high load of unresolved DPCs, leading to defective chromosome segregation and cell death. Collectively, these findings provide mechanistic insights into SUMO-driven pathways underlying replication-independent DPC resolution and highlight their critical importance in maintaining chromosome stability and cellular fitness.

Astragalus polysaccharide protects formaldehyde-induced toxicity by promoting NER pathway in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

INTRODUCTION: In our previous study, it has been confirmed that formaldehyde (FA) not only inhibits the proliferative activity, but also causes DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) formation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). The purpose of this study was to detect the protective effect of astragalus polysaccharide (APS) against the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of BMSCs exposed to FA, and to explore potential molecular mechanisms of APS activity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Human BMSCs were cultured in vitro and randomly divided into control cells (Ctrl group), FA-treated cells (FA group, 120 µmol/L), and cells incubated with FA and increasing concentrations (40, 100, or 400 µg/mL) of APS (FA + APS groups). Cytotoxicity was measured by MTT assay. DNA strand breakage, DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs), and micronucleus formation were respectively detected by comet assay, KCl-SDS precipitation assay, and micronucleus assay. The mRNA and protein expression level of xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA), xeroderma pigmentosum group C (XPC), excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), replication protein A1 (RPA1), and replication protein A2 (RPA2) were all detected by qRT-PCR and Western Blot. RESULTS: Compared with the FA group, the cytotoxicity, DNA strand breakage, DPCs, and micronucleus levels were decreased significantly in FA + APS groups (P < 0.01). Meanwhile, the mRNA and protein expression of XPA, XPC, ERCC1, RPA1, and RPA2 were up regulated significantly in the FA + APS groups (P < 0.05) with the most prominent effect of the 100 µg/mL APS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that APS can protect the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of human BMSCs induced by FA. The mechanism may be associated with up-regulated expression of XPA, XPC, ERCC1, RPA1, and RPA2 in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway which promotes DNA damage repair.

The Trinity of SPRTN Protease Regulation.

The protease SPRTN emerged as the essential enzyme for DNA-protein crosslink proteolysis repair. Biochemical and cell biological work indicated that SPRTN is a nonspecific protease. Recent and independent studies from Lou, Stingele, and Ramadan reveal that SPRTN activity is modulated via three layers of regulation that make it selective for DNA-protein crosslinks.

DNA-protein crosslinks are repaired via homologous recombination in mammalian mitochondria.

While mammalian mitochondria are known to possess a robust base excision repair system, direct evidence for the existence of additional mitochondrial DNA repair pathways is elusive. Herein a PCR-based assay was employed to demonstrate that plasmids containing DNA-protein crosslinks are rapidly repaired following electroporation into isolated mammalian mitochondria. Several lines of evidence argue that this repair occurs via homologous recombination. First, DNA-protein crosslinks present on plasmid DNA homologous to the mitochondrial genome were efficiently repaired (21 % repair in three hours), whereas a DNA-protein crosslink present on DNA that lacked homology to the mitochondrial genome remained unrepaired. Second, DNA-protein crosslinks present on plasmid DNA lacking homology to the mitochondrial genome were repaired when they were co-electroporated into mitochondria with an undamaged, homologous plasmid DNA molecule. Third, no repair was observed when DNA-protein crosslink-containing plasmids were electroporated into mitochondria isolated from cells pre-treated with the Rad51 inhibitor B02. These findings suggest that mitochondria utilize homologous recombination to repair endogenous and xenobiotic-induced DNA-protein crosslinks. Consistent with this interpretation, cisplatin-induced mitochondrial DNA-protein crosslinks accumulated to higher levels in cells pre-treated with B02 than in control cisplatin-treated cells. These results represent the first evidence of how spontaneous and xenobiotic-induced DNA-protein crosslinks are removed from mitochondrial DNA.

Debulking of topoisomerase DNA-protein crosslinks (TOP-DPC) by the proteasome, non-proteasomal and non-proteolytic pathways.

Topoisomerases play a pivotal role in ensuring DNA metabolisms during replication, transcription and chromosomal segregation. To manage DNA topology, topoisomerases generate break(s) in the DNA backbone by forming transient enzyme-DNA cleavage complexes (TOPcc) with phosphotyrosyl linkages between DNA ends and topoisomerase catalytic tyrosyl residues. Topoisomerases have been identified as the cellular targets of a variety of anti-cancer drugs (e.g. topotecan, irinotecan, etoposide and doxorubicin, and antibiotics (e.g. ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin). These drugs, as well as other exogenous and endogenous agents, convert the transient TOPcc into persistent TOPcc, which we refer to as topoisomerase DNA-protein crosslinks (TOP-DPC) that challenge genome integrity and lead to cell death if left unrepaired. Proteolysis of the bulky protein component of TOP-DPC (debulking) is a poorly understood repair process employed across eukaryotes. TOP-DPC proteolysis can be achieved either by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) or by non-proteasomal proteases, which are typified by the metalloprotease SPRTN/WSS1. Debulking of TOP-DPC exposes the phosphotyrosyl bonds, hence enables tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterases (TDP1 and TDP2) to access and cleave the bonds. In this review, we focus on current knowledge of the protease pathways for debulking TOP-DPC and highlighting recent advances in understanding the mechanisms regulating the proteolytic repair pathways. We also discuss the avenues that are being exploited to target the proteolytic repair pathways for improving the clinical outcome of topoisomerase inhibitors.

How to fix DNA-protein crosslinks.

Proteins that act on DNA, or are in close proximity to it, can become inadvertently crosslinked to DNA and form highly toxic lesions, known as DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs). DPCs are generated by different chemotherapeutics, environmental or endogenous sources of crosslinking agents, or by lesions on DNA that stall the catalytic cycle of certain DNA processing enzymes. These bulky adducts impair processes on DNA such as DNA replication or transcription, and therefore pose a serious threat to genome integrity. The large diversity of DPCs suggests that there is more than one canonical mechanism to repair them. Indeed, many different enzymes have been shown to act on DPCs by either processing the protein, the DNA or the crosslink itself. In addition, the cell cycle stage or cell type are likely to dictate pathway choice. In recent years, a detailed understanding of DPC repair during S phase has started to emerge. Here, we review the current knowledge on the mechanisms of replication-coupled DPC repair, and describe and also speculate on possible pathways that remove DPCs outside of S phase. Moreover, we highlight a recent paradigm shifting finding that indicates that DPCs are not always detrimental, but can also play a protective role, preserving the genome from more deleterious forms of DNA damage.

New insights into abasic site repair and tolerance.

Thousands of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP or abasic) sites form in each cell, each day. This simple DNA lesion can have profound consequences to cellular function, genome stability, and disease. As potent blocks to polymerases, they interfere with the reading and copying of the genome. Since they provide no coding information, they are potent sources of mutation. Due to their reactive chemistry, they are intermediates in the formation of lesions that are more challenging to repair including double-strand breaks, interstrand crosslinks, and DNA protein crosslinks. Given their prevalence and deleterious consequences, cells have multiple mechanisms of repairing and tolerating these lesions. While base excision repair of abasic sites in double-strand DNA has been studied for decades, new interest in abasic site processing has come from more recent insights into how they are processed in single-strand DNA. In this review, we discuss the source of abasic sites, their biological consequences, tolerance mechanisms, and how they are repaired in double and single-stranded DNA.

Cross-linking of the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase to DNA in the presence of cisplatin.

1,1,2,2-cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (cisplatin) is a chemotherapeutic agent widely used in the clinic to treat various cancers. The antitumor activity of cisplatin is generally attributed to its ability to form intrastrand and interstrand DNA-DNA cross-links via sequential platination of two nucleophilic sites within the DNA duplex. However, cisplatin also induces DNA- protein lesions (DPCs) that may contribute to its biological effects due to their ability to block DNA replication and transcription. We previously reported that over 250 nuclear proteins including high mobility group proteins, histone proteins, and elongation factors formed DPCs in human HT1080 cells treated with cisplatin (Ming et al. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2017, 30, 980-995). Interestingly, cisplatin-induced DNA-protein conjugates were reversed upon heating, by an unknown mechanism. In the present work, DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) was used as a model to investigate the molecular details of cisplatin-mediated DNA-protein cross-linking and to establish the mechanism of their reversal. We found that AGT is readily cross-linked to DNA in the presence of cisplatin. HPLC-ESI+-MS/MS sequencing of tryptic peptides originating from dG-Pt-AGT complexes revealed that the cross-linking occurred at six sites within this protein including Glu110, Lys125, Cys145, His146, Arg147, and Cys150. Cisplatin-induced Lys-Gua cross-links (1,1-cis-diammine-2-(5-amino-5-carboxypentyl)amino-2-(2'-deoxyguanosine-7-yl)-platinum(II) (dG-Pt-Lys) were detected by HPLC-ESI+-MS/MS of total digests of modified protein in comparison with the corresponding authentic standard. Upon heating, dG-Pt-AGT complexes were subject to platination migration from protein to DNA, forming cis-[Pt(NH3)2{d(GpG)}] cross-links which were detected by HPLC-ESI+-MS/MS. Our results provide a new insight into the mechanism of cisplatin-mediated DNA-protein cross-linking and their dynamic equilibrium with the corresponding DNA-DNA lesions.

Excision repair of topoisomerase DNA-protein crosslinks (TOP-DPC).

Topoisomerases are essential enzymes solving DNA topological problems such as supercoils, knots and catenanes that arise from replication, transcription, chromatin remodeling and other nucleic acid metabolic processes. They are also the targets of widely used anticancer drugs (e.g. topotecan, irinotecan, enhertu, etoposide, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone) and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (e.g. ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin). Topoisomerases manipulate DNA topology by cleaving one DNA strand (TOP1 and TOP3 enzymes) or both in concert (TOP2 enzymes) through the formation of transient enzyme-DNA cleavage complexes (TOPcc) with phosphotyrosyl linkages between DNA ends and the catalytic tyrosyl residue of the enzymes. Failure in the self-resealing of TOPcc results in persistent TOPcc (which we refer it to as topoisomerase DNA-protein crosslinks (TOP-DPC)) that threaten genome integrity and lead to cancers and neurodegenerative diseases. The cell prevents the accumulation of topoisomerase-mediated DNA damage by excising TOP-DPC and ligating the associated breaks using multiple pathways conserved in eukaryotes. Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterases (TDP1 and TDP2) cleave the tyrosyl-DNA bonds whereas structure-specific endonucleases such as Mre11 and XPF (Rad1) incise the DNA phosphodiester backbone to remove the TOP-DPC along with the adjacent DNA segment. The proteasome and metalloproteases of the WSS1/Spartan family typify proteolytic repair pathways that debulk TOP-DPC to make the peptide-DNA bonds accessible to the TDPs and endonucleases. The purpose of this review is to summarize our current understanding of how the cell excises TOP-DPC and why, when and where the cell recruits one specific mechanism for repairing topoisomerase-mediated DNA damage, acquiring resistance to therapeutic topoisomerase inhibitors and avoiding genomic instability, cancers and neurodegenerative diseases.