Comparative in vitro evaluation of remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the remaining dentine thickness (RDT) following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars. Research question was 'Is there any difference between the remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars?'. METHODS: Electronic Databases like MEDLINE PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Google scholar and grey literature were searched between January 1, 2006 and August 31, 2022 for in vitro and ex vivo studies that compared hand and rotary endodontic instrumentation to evaluate the RDT in primary molars. Articles published in English or which could be translated into English were searched. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the Revised, validated version of MINORS criteria. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in qualitative analysis. All included studies showed low risk of bias. Six studies showed more RDT with rotary instrumentation compared to manual instrumentation. Whereas, five studies showed variable results for RDT with manual and rotary instrumentation at different levels of root canals. One study showed no significant difference between manual and rotary instrumentation. In view of methodological heterogeneity of the findings, a meta-analysis was not conducted. CONCLUSION: High quality of evidence based on low risk of bias was found in all the included studies. Statistically, rotary instrumentation showed more RDT than manual instrumentation according to majority of studies. Despite the shortcomings of this systematic review, it is possible to infer that the use of rotary instrumentation provides more RDT and thus there is considerable conservation of tooth structure.

Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of four instrumentation systems in curved root canals.

AIM: To compare the shaping ability of four instrumentation systems in curved molar root canals, using computerized microtomography (micro-CT). METHODOLOGY: Forty mesial roots of mandibular molars were submitted first to radiographic examination to determine their curvature and then to a micro-CT scan to analyse other initial morphological characteristics. The specimens were distributed into four experimental groups, according to the endodontic instrumentation system used (n = 10): Group R, Reciproc; Group PTN, ProTaper Next; Group WOG, WaveOne Gold; Group PDL, ProDesign Logic. After root canal instrumentation, the specimens were submitted to a second micro-CT scan, and the pre- and postoperative data were examined to evaluate the following parameters: volume of dentine removed (DR), increase in root canal volume (VI), untouched root canal surface area (UA), volume of accumulated hard tissue debris (AD) and structure model index (SMI). The data observed for these parameters after instrumentation were analysed using generalized linear models. R software was used for the analyses, and the level of significance adopted was 5%. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the instrumentation systems regarding the DR, VI, UA and AD parameters (P > 0.05). PTN and WOG systems were associated with greater increases in SMI than the PDL system (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The four systems evaluated were similar regarding the parameters analysed, with the exception of the SMI, with the rate of variation of this parameter being greater after using the PTN and WOG systems than after using the PDL system. These results indicate that the four systems perform similarly in terms of their shaping ability, but that the PTN and WOG systems produced more rounded preparations than the PDL system.

Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals.

AIM: To compare the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals using micro-computed tomographic analysis. METHODOLOGY: Forty anatomically matched mandibular incisors were scanned and assigned to four groups (n = 10), according to the canal preparation protocol: BioRace, Reciproc, Self-Adjusting File (SAF) and TRUShape systems. After canal instrumentation, the specimens were rescanned, and the registered pre- and postoperative datasets were examined to evaluate the percentages of accumulated hard-tissue debris, untouched canal walls and dentine removed. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests with Bonferroni correction were used to compare the variables in the groups (α = 5%). RESULTS: The preparation techniques did not affect the percentage of accumulated hard-tissue debris (P = 0.126). The percentage of untouched canal areas was significantly higher for BioRace (32.38%)compared to Reciproc (18.95%) and SAF (16.08%) systems (P < 0.05). Reciproc removed significantly more dentine (4.18%) than BioRace (2.21%) and SAF (2.56%) (P < 0.05). The TRUShape system had intermediate results for both untouched canal walls (19.20%) and dentine removed (3.77%), with no significant difference compared to BioRace, Reciproc and SAF systems. CONCLUSIONS: The preparation techniques resulted in the same level of accumulated hard-tissue debris. Compared to the other tested systems, BioRace was associated with more untouched canal walls and Reciproc produced the greatest amount of removed dentine. Although it touched more of the root canal walls, the SAF system removed less dentine, whereas TRUShape had intermediate results for these same parameters. None of the systems tested were able to provide optimal shaping ability in oval-shaped canals.