Long-term effectiveness of the Diabetes Conversation Map™ Program on health outcomes: A case-control retrospective cohort study.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical and health behavioural outcomes of a large sample of participants from the Diabetes Conversation Map™ Program. DESIGN: A matched-case-control study that was performed on a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Participants were 11,053 Clalit Health Services members with type 2 diabetes who enrolled in the Diabetes Conversation Map™ Program between January 2010 - April 2016. The matched-control group was formulated using sequential matching, by matching cases to controls at a ratio of 1:3, based on age, sex, and HbA1c level. The associations between the programme group and annual clinical and health behaviours were assessed between cases and controls at five time points using linear and Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: The intervention group had significantly lower HbA1c, glucose, and low-density lipoprotein levels and more frequent glucose blood testing each year up to 36 month post-enrolment compared with the matched controls. Other outcomes were significantly different for shorter time periods, including higher high-density lipoprotein and lower triglyceride levels at 6- and 12-month follow-up and lower diastolic blood pressure and greater medication adherence at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Enrolment in the programme was associated with improved clinical and health behaviour outcomes for at least 6 months and most outcomes persisted for up to 36 months. IMPACT: This is the first study to evaluate the Diabetes Conversation Map™ Program with a large sample over long period of time. This nurse-led group intervention evaluation adds to the literature on health outcomes on the lives of patients with type 2 diabetes. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study was registered retrospectively to the Open Science Framework, the registration form can be found at: https://osf.io/63cse.

Effectiveness of Managing Diabetes During Ramadan Conversation Map intervention: A difference-in-differences (self-comparison) design.

BACKGROUND: Some individuals with diabetes fast during Ramadan despite medical concerns for risk of adverse outcomes. The Managing Diabetes During Ramadan Conversation Map is a self-management education group-based intervention for Muslim individuals with type 2 diabetes, specifically addressing diabetes management during Ramadan. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Managing Diabetes During Ramadan Conversation Map intervention in improving short-term clinical outcomes and reducing healthcare utilization following Ramadan. DESIGN: This was a retrospective rolling cohort study. SETTINGS: Participants were Clalit Health Services members with type 2 diabetes who participated in the intervention between 2014 and 2017 across Israel. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 1732 participants who enrolled in the intervention over the five-year study period. The cohort was mainly between the ages of 45 and 74 years (83.3%), female (71.9%), of lower socioeconomic status (92.1%), with a diabetes duration of 10 years or more (51.7%), obese (64.0%), and had never smoked (73.8%). METHODS: The data used in this study came from Clalit Health Services' electronic health records, which are integrated in a central data warehouse. We used a difference-in-differences (self-comparison) design to examine the effect of the intervention on changes in laboratory results and healthcare utilization over a six month baseline and follow-up. Mixed model linear regressions and Poisson regressions were used to estimate continuous and count outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Post intervention, participants experienced a reduction of 8.61 mg/dL in their glucose levels (p = 0.005) and 0.34% in their HbA1c levels (p < 0.001). In a sub-group analysis of participants with HbA1c > 7%, larger reductions in glucose (17.02 mg/dL [p < 0.001]) and HbA1c (0.63% [p < 0.001]) levels were recorded. This sub-group also experienced a reduction of 4.83 mg/dL in LDL level (p = 0.007) and had 0.2 fewer primary care visits (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in the Managing Diabetes During Ramadan Conversation Map improved patient glucose and HbA1c levels. A greater benefit was reported in those individuals with HbA1c > 7%. These findings hold important global health implications for the millions of individuals with type 2 diabetes for whom Ramadan can pose a challenge in disease control.

Which patients with Type 2 diabetes will have greater compliance to participation in the Diabetes Conversation Map™ program? A retrospective cohort study.

AIM: To investigate the characteristics of participants in the Diabetes Conversation Map™ (Map™) program who had higher vs. lower compliance to the program, to determine if program tailoring and monitoring is needed among these groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 8990 patients enrolled in the Map™ program (low compliance [attending 0-1 sessions, n = 2759] and high compliance [attending ≥2 sessions, n = 6231]). Socio-demographic, clinical, health behaviors, and healthcare utilization characteristics were extracted. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used as the analysis strategy. RESULTS: Those who were of higher socio-economic status (OR = 1.567, 95%CI:1.317-1.865), who lived in urban area (OR = 1.501, 95%CI:1.254-1.798), with greater frequency of primary care visits (OR = 1.012, 95%CI:1.002-1.021), with medium (OR = 1.176, 95%CI:1.013-1.365) or high oral medication adherence (OR = 1.198, 95%CI:1.059-1.356), and with a greater frequency of blood glucose tests (OR = 1.102, 95%CI:1.033-1.175) had greater odds of being in the high compliance group. Conversely, those aged 35-44 (OR = 0.538, 95%CI:0.402-0.721) and 45-54 years (OR = 0.763, 95%CI:0.622-0.937), with longer Type 2 diabetes duration (OR = 0.980, 95%CI:0.967-0.993), with higher blood glucose levels (OR = 0.999, 95%CI:0.998-1.000), and current (OR = 0.659, 95%CI:0.569-0.762) or former smokers (OR = 0.831, 95%CI:0.737-0.938) had reduced odds for being in the higher compliance group. CONCLUSIONS: Instructors in advance can target sub-groups to increase their attendance rates, and consequently improve their outcomes.

Evaluating the Impact of Diabetes Self-Management Education Methods on Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours of Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes self-management refers to all activities patients undertake to care for their illness, promote health and prevent the long- and short-term effects of diabetes. This study compared the effectiveness of 2 diabetes self-management education methods by examining changes in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels and knowledge, attitudes and behaviours (KABs) after traditional group education (TE) or with diabetes conversation maps (CMs). The CMs group was postulated to show greater decrease in A1C levels and improved KABs scores compared to the TE group. METHODS: A sample of 21 eligible clients from Diabetes Care Guelph were randomly assigned into 2 groups: 10 receiving education through CMs and 11 through TE. Changes in knowledge and attitude were determined by using questionnaires and repeated-measures pretest and post-test design before and after the education sessions. Changes in A1C levels were determined by comparing values at baseline and at 3 months after receiving diabetes education. Two focus groups were conducted to obtain participants' perceptions of the education methods and self-reported KAB changes. RESULTS: Significant differences in knowledge and attitude score changes were observed from baseline/initial education and after 3 months. Both groups had significant decreases in A1C levels from baseline to 3 months afterward. Focus groups revealed themes common to both groups, such as benefits of early education, the need for multiple lifestyle behaviour changes and feelings about social support. CONCLUSIONS: CMs had a significant impact and are effective for group education. The changes observed may lead to improved diabetes self-management, thus reducing costly health complications related to poorly controlled diabetes.

Adherence to self-care behavior and glycemic effects using structured education.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to examine glycemic control in suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes provided by a structured education group using the Diabetes Conversation Map™ (CM™) vs usual care in a university-based hospital primary care clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, pragmatic clinical trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to structured education or usual care groups. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean change of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the percentage achieving therapeutic HbA1c goal and self-behavioral changes. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients were randomly assigned to two groups (CM™ group n = 121; usual care group, n = 116). The absolute reduction of HbA1c was significantly greater in the CM™ group at 3 and 6 months (Δ = -0.59% and Δ = -1.13%, P < 0.01), but the difference was no longer statistically significant at 9 and 12 months (Δ = -0.43% and Δ = -0.49%), based on an intention-to-treat analysis. A per-protocol analysis showed the significant change was maintained at 12 months (Δ = -0.67%). In the intervention group, greater percentages of patients achieved their American Association of Diabetes Educators Self-Care Behaviours™ framework (AADE7) behavioral goals at 3 months, in particular being active, problem-solving, reducing risk and health coping. CONCLUSIONS: In type 2 diabetic patients with suboptimally controlled glucose, there were greater improvements in glucose control and self-care behavioral goals in those who underwent the CM™ education program compared with outcomes achieved in patients receiving usual care.

Development of a diabetes education program based on modified AADE diabetes education curriculum.

UNLABELLED: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a diabetes education program tailored to patients with type 2 diabetes in communities and the preliminary outcomes of the intervention. METHODS: Two-phase, one group, mixed-method study design was used. Modified American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) diabetes education curriculum was used as the framework for the program. Patients with diabetes participated in classes and diabetes conversation map discussion. Feasibility and acceptability of the program were evaluated by the ability to recruit and retain participants and their satisfaction with the program. Diabetes knowledge test and the summary of diabetes self-care activities (SDSCA) were used to evaluate the knowledge and behavior changes of the patients. RESULTS: 40 patients completed the program and the attrition rate was 11.1%. All participants were "very satisfied" with the program. Significant improvement in diabetes knowledge and blood glucose monitoring and foot care were reported. CONCLUSION: The diabetes education program based on modified AADE diabetes education curriculum combined with diabetes conversation map may be effective in patients with type 2 diabetes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Flexible time schedule and a control group should be designed in the future study.