Effect of mirror system and scanner bed of a flatbed scanner on lateral response artefact in radiochromic film dosimetry.

Radiochromic film, evaluated with flatbed scanners, is used for practical radiotherapy QA dosimetry. Film and scanner component effects contribute to the Lateral Response Artefact (LRA), which is further enhanced by light polarisation from both. This study investigates the scanner bed's contribution to LRA and also polarisation from the mirrors for widely used EPSON scanners, as part of broader investigations of this dosimetry method aiming to improve processes and uncertainties. Alternative scanner bed materials were compared on a modified EPSON V700 scanner. Polarisation effects were investigated for complete scanners (V700, V800, on- and off-axis, and V850 on-axis), for a removed V700 mirror system, and independently using retail-quality single mirror combinations simulating practical scanner arrangements, but with varying numbers (0-5) and angles. Some tests had no film present, whilst others included films (EBT3) irradiated to 6 MV doses of 0-11.3 Gy. For polarisation analysis, images were captured by a Canon 7D camera with 50 mm focal length lens. Different scanner bed materials showed only small effects, within a few percent, indicating that the normal glass bed is a good choice. Polarisation varied with scanner type (7-11%), increasing at 10 cm lateral off-axis distance by around a further 6%, and also with film dose. The V700 mirror system showed around 2% difference to the complete scanner. Polarization increased with number of mirrors in the single mirror combinations, to 14% for 4 and 5 mirrors, but specific values depend on angles and mirror quality. Novel film measurement methods could reduce LRA effect corrections and associated uncertainties.

Effect of scanner lens on lateral response artefact in radiochromic film dosimetry.

Radiochromic film is a good dosimeter choice for patient QA for complex treatment techniques because of its near tissue equivalency, high spatial resolution and established method of use. Commercial scanners are typically used for film dosimetry, with Epson scanners being the most common. Radiochromic film dosimetry is not straightforward having some well-defined problems which must be considered, one of the main ones being the Lateral Response Artefact (LRA) effect. Previous studies showed that the contributing factors to LRA are from the structure of the active ingredients of the film and the components and construction of the flatbed scanner. This study investigated the effect of the scanner lens on the LRA effect, as part of a wider investigation of scanner design effects and uncertainties. Gafchromic EBT3 films were irradiated with 40 × 40 cm2 field size 6 MV beams. Films were analysed using images captured by a Canon 7D camera utilising 18 mm, 50 mm and 100 mm focal length lenses compared to images scanned with a conventional Epson V700 scanner. The magnitude of the LRA was observed to be dependent on the focal length of the lens used to image the film. A substantial reduction in LRA was seen with the use of the 50 mm and 100 mm lenses, by factors of 3-5 for the 50 mm lens and 4-30 for the 100 mm lens compared to conventional desktop scanner techniques. This is expected to be from the longer focal length camera lens system being able to collect more light from distant areas compared to the scanner-based system. This provides an opportunity to design film dosimetry systems that minimise this artefact.

A comparison between EPSON V700 and EPSON V800 scanners for film dosimetry.

Radiochromic film is a good dosimeter choice for patient QA for complex treatment techniques (IMRT, VMAT, SABR, SBRT) because of its near tissue equivalency, very high spatial resolution and established method of use. Commercial scanners are usually used for film dosimetry, among which EPSON scanners are the most common. NCCI have used an EPSON V700 scanner, but recently acquired a new model EPSON V800 scanner. The purpose of this work was to evaluate any differences between these two scanners to consider whether they can be used interchangeably or not. Different aspects of film dosimetry, e.g. lateral response artefact (LRA) effect, orientation effect, scanner response etc., were compared. EBT3 films were irradiated with 40 × 40 cm2 field size 6 MV beams and scanned in both the scanners. The scanned images were read in ImageJ V1.49 software. The data obtained was then copied in MS Excel to compare the scanners. The V800 scanner causes more polarisation, which results in more LRA effect than for the V700 scanner. The responses of the scanners in all three colour channels are not the same for the same film and irradiation. The V800 scanner shows an increase of response of up to 1.6% compared to 3.7% increase in the V700 scanner after scanning a piece of irradiated film 20 times. The scanners cannot be used interchangeably. The correction factors for LRA effect and the calibration curves are different. Further characterisation, evaluation and commissioning is required before clinical use.