COVID-19 vaccination initiation and completion in a multicenter cohort study of insured US transgender and cisgender adults.

PURPOSE: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people may have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, yet little is known about vaccination status in this population. This multicenter cohort study of insured adults examined the rates of COVID-19 vaccine initiation and completion in TGD persons compared to matched cisgender persons. METHODS: A cohort of TGD persons and matched cisgender persons enrolled in Kaiser Permanente health plans in Northern and Southern California between 12/1/2020 and 7/31/2021 were analyzed. COVID-19 vaccination initiation and completion rates were compared across groups using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Among transmasculine persons, the HR (95 % CI) estimates for COVID-19 vaccination initiation and completion were, respectively, 1.35 (1.30-1.40) and 1.78 (1.71-1.85) compared with cisgender women and 1.34 (1.29-1.40) and 1.81 (1.73-1.88) compared with cisgender men. Among transfeminine persons, the corresponding HRs (95 % CIs) for vaccination initiation and completion were 1.35 (1.30-1.40) and 1.78 (1.71-1.85) compared with cisgender women and 1.34 (1.29-1.40) and 1.81 (1.73-1.88) compared with cisgender men. CONCLUSION: Findings from this cohort of insured adults demonstrated that TGD persons initiated and completed COVID-19 vaccination at higher rates compared to matched cisgender persons. Further work is needed to understand vaccination rates and determinants in the broader TGD populations.

Digital Footprints of Obesity Treatment: GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and the Health Equity Divide.

Our research investigates the societal implications of access to glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, particularly in light of recent clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of semaglutide in reducing cardiovascular mortality. A decade-long analysis of Google Trends indicates a significant increase in searches for GLP-1 agonists, primarily in North America. This trend contrasts with the global prevalence of obesity. Given the high cost of GLP-1 agonists, a critical question arises: Will this disparity in medication accessibility exacerbate the global health equity gap in obesity treatment? This viewpoint explores strategies to address the health equity gap exacerbated by this emerging medication. Because GLP-1 agonists hold the potential to become a cornerstone in obesity treatment, ensuring equitable access is a pressing public health concern.

A study of size threshold for cooling effect in urban parks and their cooling accessibility and equity.

Rapid urbanization has led to increasingly prominent urban heat island phenomena and social inequality. It is urgent to quantify the threshold area of urban parks from multiple perspectives to maximize the cooling effect and improve the equity of park cooling services. Using 33 urban parks in Harbin City as research objects, four indices, i.e., park cooling intensity (PCI), park cooling distance (PCD), park cooling area (PCA), and park cooling efficiency (PCE), were used to explore the park cooling effect and the threshold value of efficiency (TVoE) of the size. The OD (origin-destination) matrix model was constructed to assess the spatial accessibility from the community to the cooling range. The Gini coefficient was used to assess the equity of cooling range accessibility. The relative contribution of each influencing factor to the cooling indicator was quantified through regression modeling. The results showed that the average PCI was 3.27 â„ƒ, the average PCD was 277 m, the average PCA was 115.35 ha, and the average PCE was 5.74. Gray space area was the dominant factor for PCI, PCD, and PCA (relative contributions of 100%, 31%, and 19%, respectively). Park area was the dominant factor for PCE (relative contribution of 28%). The TVoE of park sizes based on PCA and PCE were calculated as 82.37 ha and 2.56 ha, respectively. 39.2% and 94.01% of communities can reach cooling ranges within 15 min in walk mode and transit mode, respectively. Approximately 18% of neighborhood residents are experiencing severe inequities in cooling range accessibility. This study can guide park design that maximizes cooling effects, as well as inform city planners on more equitable allocation of urban park resources.

Enhancing Human Health and Wellbeing through Sustainably and Equitably Unlocking a Healthy Ocean's Potential.

A healthy ocean is essential for human health, and yet the links between the ocean and human health are often overlooked. By providing new medicines, technologies, energy, foods, recreation, and inspiration, the ocean has the potential to enhance human health and wellbeing. However, climate change, pollution, biodiversity loss, and inequity threaten both ocean and human health. Sustainable realisation of the ocean's health benefits will require overcoming these challenges through equitable partnerships, enforcement of laws and treaties, robust monitoring, and use of metrics that assess both the ocean's natural capital and human wellbeing. Achieving this will require an explicit focus on human rights, equity, sustainability, and social justice. In addition to highlighting the potential unique role of the healthcare sector, we offer science-based recommendations to protect both ocean health and human health, and we highlight the unique potential of the healthcare sector tolead this effort.

Inclusive Approaches for Measuring Demographics of Underrepresented Populations in STEM and Biomedical Research Training Programs.

As federal strategic plans prioritize increasing diversity within the biomedical workforce, and STEM training and outreach programs seek to recruit and retain students from historically underrepresented populations, there is a need for interrogation of traditional demographic descriptors and careful consideration of best practices for obtaining demographic data. To accelerate this work, equity-focused researchers and leaders from STEM programs convened to examine approaches for measuring demographic variables. Gender, race/ethnicity, disability, and disadvantaged background were prioritized given their focus by federal funding agencies. Categories of sex minority, sexual (orientation) minority, and gender minority (SSGM) should be included in demographic measures collected by STEM programs, consistent with recommendations from White House Executive Orders and federal reports. Our manuscript offers operationalized phrasing for demographic questions and recommendations for use across student-serving programs. Inclusive demographics permit the identification of individuals who are being excluded, marginalized, or improperly aggregated, increasing capacity to address inequities in biomedical research training. As trainees do not enter training programs with equal access, accommodations, or preparation, inclusive demographic measures can welcome trainees and inform a nuanced set of program outcomes that facilitate research on intersectionality to support the recruitment and retention of underrepresented students in biomedical research.

Racial (In)Equity in South Los Angeles-Community Centered Experiences with COVID-19 Syndemics.

Objectives: To analyze community experiences involving COVID-19 vaccination access and equity in Black and Latina/o/x communities within South Los Angeles, using a socioecological framework. Methods: We conducted four virtual focus groups (n = 33 total participants) in 2021, with Black and Latina/o/x community members, community leaders, and community-based providers in South Los Angeles, a region highly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We used a grounded theory approach to guide the analysis and generate data shaped by participant perspectives. Results: Participants across groups consistently emphasized medical mistrust, fear/skepticism, misinformation, accessibility, and feelings of pressure and blame as factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination decisions. The need to address pandemic-related socioeconomic hardships in underresourced communities was equally highlighted. Conclusions: Findings show that building trust, providing tailored information, and continued investment into diversity and equity initiatives can support Black and Latino/a/x communities in making informed health decisions. Community-centered support services should address the economic, social, and structural impact of the pandemic on vulnerable communities. Furthermore, public health and policy efforts must prioritize funding to equip social and health care systems with infrastructure investment in racial and ethnic minority communities.

Improving Weight Bias Awareness Among Providers in the Sexual and Reproductive Health care Setting.

Introduction: Provider bias against patients of higher weights can contribute to poor health outcomes and decreased quality of care and patient experience. Addressing weight stigma in sexual and reproductive health settings is important, as these encounters can often be patients' only health care touchpoint. Health care providers must be educated about the harms of weight stigma, ways to recognize and confront their biases, and how to advocate for patients of all sizes. Methods: In this quality improvement project, Planned Parenthood health center providers participated in a three-part virtual workshop to improve provider weight bias awareness and understanding using the Health at Every Size framework. Providers completed a pre- and post-survey, as well as a 3-month follow-up survey to assess changes in bias awareness and confidence in applying weight-neutral principles in care interactions. Results: Analysis of pre- and post-survey results showed significant improvements in provider awareness of bias as well as changes in implicit bias scores and confidence providing weight-neutral care. Conclusion: Educating providers about weight contributes to equity of care for patients of higher weights. Formal education such as workshops have the potential to reduce the harms of weight stigma in health care as changing attitudes and confidence are a precursor to behavior change. Research is needed to assess ideal education modalities and whether receiving care from weight bias-prepared providers affects patient outcomes and experiences.

Racism as a Threat to Palestinian Health Equity.

Between October 2023 and April 2024, more than 30,000 Palestinians were killed, and countless others injured, displaced, and traumatized, in the fifth major Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip since 2006. Recent events, along with the trajectory of events over the past 75 years, demonstrate that using a public health framework could help recognize racism as a structural and social determinant of Palestinian health. Using the principles of health equity, we show how Palestinian health inequities are rooted in settler colonialism and racism, amounting to violence and oppression against Palestinian Arabs as a racialized group, regardless of religion or citizenship. Structural racism should be recognized as a driver of Palestinian health inequities.

Assessment of Racial Misclassification Among American Indian and Alaska Native Identity in Cancer Surveillance Data in the United States and Considerations for Oral Health: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Misclassification of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples exists across various databases in research and clinical practice. Oral health is associated with cancer incidence and survival; however, misclassification adds another layer of complexity to understanding the impact of poor oral health. The objective of this literature review was to systematically evaluate and analyze publications focused on racial misclassification of AI/AN racial identities among cancer surveillance data. Methods: The PRISMA Statement and the CONSIDER Statement were used for this systematic literature review. Studies involving the racial misclassification of AI/AN identity among cancer surveillance data were screened for eligibility. Data were analyzed in terms of the discussion of racial misclassification, methods to reduce this error, and the reporting of research involving Indigenous peoples. Results: A total of 66 articles were included with publication years ranging from 1972 to 2022. A total of 55 (83%) of the 66 articles discussed racial misclassification. The most common method of addressing racial misclassification among these articles was linkage with the Indian Health Service or tribal clinic records (45 articles or 82%). The average number of CONSIDER checklist domains was three, with a range of zero to eight domains included. The domain most often identified was Prioritization (60), followed by Governance (47), Methodologies (31), Dissemination (27), Relationships (22), Participation (9), Capacity (9), and Analysis and Findings (8). Conclusion: To ensure equitable representation of AI/AN communities, and thwart further oppression of minorities, specifically AI/AN peoples, is through accurate data collection and reporting processes.

Using Concept Mapping to Identify Community Partners' and Researchers' Perceptions of Social Justice: A Path Toward Eliminating Chronic Disease Disparities.

Background: A social justice framework can be used to inform healthy equity-focused research, and operationalizing social justice can inform strategic planning for research and practice models. This study aimed to develop a working definition of social justice based on input from a diverse group of collaborators to better inform the work conducted within the Center for Research, Health, and Social Justice. Methods: A concept mapping study was conducted from March to May 2022. A prompt designed to elicit social justice themes was developed (phase 1). At a study website, participants brainstormed statements that represented their definition of social justice (phase 2). Participants then sorted statements based on similarity and rated statements on importance (phase 3). Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to identify nonoverlapping thematic clusters of statements (phase 4). Models were reviewed for best fit, and clusters were assigned names based on theme (phase 5). Results: Participants (n = 49) generated 52 unique statements that were sorted into 5 clusters describing social justice themes. Clusters included (1) Empathy, Awareness, and Understanding (n = 11); (2) Education and Systems Change (n = 10); (3) Policy Design and Implementation (n = 9); (4) Equity and Leveling the Playing Field (n = 11); and (5) Access to Services and Fair Living Standard (n = 11). High mean cluster ratings ranging from 5.22 to 6.02 out of 7 indicated all clusters were rated as being very important aspects of social justice. Conclusions: These data can guide the restructuring of research ecosystems that help eliminate race- and place-based health disparities.

Centering Equity and Fostering Stakeholder Collaboration and Trust-Pillars of the Maternal Health Innovation Program in Maryland.

Objective: To describe two main pillars of the Maryland Maternal Health Innovation Program (MDMOM): (1) centering equity and (2) fostering broad stakeholder collaboration and trust. Methods: We summarized MDMOM's key activities and used severe maternal morbidity (SMM) surveillance and program monitoring data to quantify MDMOM's work on the two pillars. We developed measures of hospital engagement with MDMOM (participation in quality improvement [QI] activities, participation in check-in meetings, staff involvement) and with other partners (participation in QI activities, representation in state-level groups). We examined Bonferroni-adjusted correlations between these hospital engagement measures and with key hospital characteristics: level of maternity care, annual delivery volume, and SMM rate. Results: Over 100 national and state organizations and individual stakeholders contributed to our building the MDMOM program and implementing key activities centering equity: hospital-based SMM surveillance in 20 of Maryland's 32 hospitals; almost 5,000 trainings offered to perinatal health care providers; two telemedicine/telehealth interventions; training of home visitors and community-based organization staff. Birthing hospitals represent MDMOM's main implementation partners. The strength of their participation in MDMOM QI activities is positively correlated to their participation in check-in meetings and with the degree of involvement by physicians in such activities. Higher engagement in MDMOM QI activities is also positively correlated to hospitals' participation in other state-level maternal health initiatives or groups. Conclusion: Our experience with the MDMOM program demonstrates that an equity focus and broad stakeholder collaboration building strong relationships and providing implementation support can lead to high levels of engagement in innovative maternal health interventions.

Health equity principles for oncology real world evidence studies.

BACKGROUND: Real-world research on cancer care in the community should address social determinants of health (SDOH) to advance health equity in cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. We sought patient and stakeholder perspectives to co-develop research principles to guide researchers when using patient record data to address health equity in their research protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Key informant interviews with 13 individuals elicited perspectives and insights related to health equity and SDOH when conducting research using data from community-based oncology care. Interviews included a brief overview of a prior scoping review and related questions in the interview guide. Key informants included experts in health equity and SDOH, and patient and community advisory board members. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify key themes, patterns, and insights from the interview data. Principles were developed based on the results of the analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching categories for promoting health equity were (1) education; (2) community engagement; and (3) research design and implementation. Education principles highlight the necessity of training in relevant skills to address health equity. Community engagement principles highlight various actions that researchers can take to conduct research inclusive of community concerns regarding health equity. The research design and implementation category provides practical guidelines for researchers in planning, conducting, and disseminating community-based oncology research to address health equity. CONCLUSION: Our principles guide oncology real-world research protocols to address SDOH in community settings and promote health equity. These principles should be tailored to specific cancer topics and communities.

Día de Muertos: A confluence of gross anatomy, culture, and spirituality.

Is there room for spirituality and reflection in gross anatomy? While Jesuit institutions have incorporated contemplation and reflection into their curricula for centuries; the integration of reflective practices into the gross anatomy curriculum has gained traction in recent years. Additionally, more emphasis has been placed on diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging within health professions education. As a Jesuit, Catholic university that is simultaneously classified as a Hispanic-Serving Institute (HSI), Regis University was well-positioned to integrate reflective and celebratory activities in honor of Día de Muertos (the Day of the Dead) into a graduate level anatomy course for Doctor of Physical Therapy students. From a communal ofrenda (altar) to a celebration during a lecture to a reflective ceremony honoring body donors in the laboratory, students and faculty constructed a learning environment that incorporated spirituality and culture into anatomy in a thoughtful manner. Furthermore, by seeking student input on the design of this innovative educational experience, each of these activities aided in fostering a sense of cultural and spiritual belonging for Hispanic and Latine students who are historically marginalized in health professions, thereby promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging through a gross anatomy course.

Cultivating Inclusivity and Bridging Gaps Through Reverse Mentoring: A Feasibility Study Within the Royal College of Radiologists.

AIM: The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) recognizes the importance of addressing differential attainment, bridging existing disparities, and fostering diversity and equity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A joint-faculty reverse mentoring (RM) pilot launched from July 2023 to January 2024. Participation was voluntary, mentors (trainees) from ethnic minority backgrounds and mentees (RCR officers) were recruited across the UK. Mentoring pairs engaged in regular meetings focused on sharing lived experiences and informal discussions. Data were collected through prepilot and postpilot surveys, virtual question polls at induction meeting, and written reports. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. RESULTS: Eight matched pairs met predominantly online, on average 4 times over 6 months. Discussions covered a wide range of topics exploring systemic biases and professional development. Expectations expressed were to learn from others' experiences and achieve personal and professional growth. The prepilot survey revealed that 50% of respondents had experienced or witnessed racial discrimination, with only 28.5% feeling capable of supporting colleagues facing challenges. By mid-pilot, meaningful connections were established, allowing mentors to share experiences, and foster safe spaces. The postpilot survey results indicated that 90% of respondents felt better equipped to support colleagues facing challenges related to protected characteristics. Key lessons included understanding cultural differences, resilience, and empowering participants to drive change. CONCLUSIONS: The exchange of perspectives and experiences between individuals from diverse backgrounds and levels of expertise enhanced mutual understanding and inclusivity. This dynamic process has the potential to catalyze positive change across diverse domains, underlining its significance in shaping a more equitable postgraduate training landscape.

Assessing Health Equity in Partnership with Children's Mental Health Organizations: Considerations Before the Implementation of Parenting Programs.

Objectives: Understanding and addressing how an individual's social, political, economic, and cultural context affects their ability to achieve optimal health is essential to designing and implementing interventions. Before evaluating two parenting programs, in partnership with four children's mental health organizations, we used the Health Equity Impact Assessment tool (HEIA) to identify groups that may experience unintended health impacts, as well as generated mitigation strategies to address these impacts. Methods: HEIA activities included a review of the published literature, a review of organizational documents, key informant interviews with staff (n = 12) and other related community service providers (n = 7), and a geographic information systems analysis. All sources of evidence were considered and analyzed using reflective thematic analysis. Summary reports were shared with all partners. Results: A range of groups were identified as at risk of experiencing unintended health impacts, including caregivers who are racialized, immigrants, Indigenous, living with mental health issues or addictions, dealing with intellectual challenges and/or low literacy levels, survivors of childhood trauma, single parent families, or families experiencing financial difficulties. Unintended health impacts were sorted into 6 main themes which fell under the overarching themes of accessibility of the programs and cultural appropriateness. Mitigation strategies as well as innovative strategies already being applied by participating organizations are discussed. Conclusion: Although this HEIA focused on parenting programs, the findings address equity issues applicable to the provision of a wide spectrum of children's mental health services.

Navigating Homelessness Assistance While Pregnant: A Rapid Qualitative Research-to-Policy Collaboration in Washington, DC.

Background: Homelessness during pregnancy contributes to adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes from birth through early childhood. Washington, DC, a microcosm of structural inequities in the United States, has persistent racial disparities in perinatal outcomes and housing insecurity. Methods: Grounded in a reproductive justice framework, we explored the lived experience of navigating homelessness assistance while pregnant to inform recommendations for a collaborative policy and practice change effort. We conducted 20 individual interviews with DC residents who experienced homelessness during pregnancy. We analyzed the data using thematic analysis and an action-oriented approach. Results: Our analysis resulted in three main recommendation areas for policy and practice change: (1) timely and meaningful access to safe and stable housing in pregnancy; (2) care coordination for services and referrals that support physical, mental, and social well-being; and (3) access to a living wage and affordable housing. Discussion: Access to stable housing is critical to ensure that pregnant and parenting people can have and raise children in a safe and sustainable environment-key tenets of reproductive justice. Housing support must be meaningfully accessible, including service delivery that accommodates the complex social histories and competing demands that accompany housing insecurity. Health Equity Implications: This study informed the development of strategic recommendations, catalyzed a new model for multisector collaboration, and influenced a system-wide practice change to expand access to robust housing supports for pregnant people. Policy and practice change require sustained leveraging of political will to promote economic justice and ensure that residents can achieve safe, sustainable, and affordable housing.

Promoting Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice in Grantmaking for Health Care Research: A Pragmatic Review and Framework.

Funders of research have an opportunity to advance health equity and social justice by incorporating principles of diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) in their approach to grantmaking. We conducted a pragmatic review to identify opportunities for grantmakers in the health care sector to integrate DEIJ in their funding activities. The resulting framework discusses recommendations within three phases as follows: (1) Organizational Context (i.e., initiate DEIJ efforts within the grantmaking organization, invest in community partnerships, and establish DEIJ goals), (2) Grantmaking Process (i.e., DEIJ-specific practices related to grant design, application, proposal review processes, and support for grantees), and (3) Assessment of Process and Outcomes (i.e., measurement, evaluation, and dissemination to maximize impact of DEIJ efforts). Throughout all grantmaking phases, it is critical to partner with and engage individuals and communities that have been historically marginalized in health care and research. In this article, we describe how adoption of framework practices can leverage grantmaking to advance DEIJ for communities, researchers, and projects.