The Safety and Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) increases with age. Previous trials confirm that elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an effective intervention for AAA. However, few elderly patients were recruited into randomized trials, whereas in contemporary clinical practice, elective repair is commonly performed on octogenarians. We evaluated the safety and outcome of elective EVAR in elderly patients to inform clinical practice and vascular service provision. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting risk of complications and death in patients undergoing elective EVAR was performed (PROSPERO CRD: 42022308423). Observational studies and interventional arms of randomized trials were included if the outcome rates or raw data were provided. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were longer-term mortality, 30-day major adverse events, and aneurysm-related mortality. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between octogenarians and non-octogenarians. Exclusion criteria were emergency procedures, non-infrarenal aneurysms, and lack of octogenarian data. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies were eligible from 10 099 citations, including 10 national and 5 international registries, 26 retrospective studies, and our own prospective cohort. The analysis included 208 997 non-octogenarians (mean age=70.19 [SD=0.62]) and 106 188 octogenarians (mean age=83.75 [SD=0.35]). The 30-day mortality post-elective EVAR was higher in octogenarians (1.08% in non-octogenarians, 2.31% in octogenarians, odds ratio [OR]=2.27 [2.08-2.47], p<0.0001). Linear regression demonstrated a 0.83% increase in 30-day mortality for every 10-year age increase above 60 years old. Mortality for octogenarians increased significantly during follow-up: 11.35% (OR=1.87 [1.65-2.13], p<0.001), 22.80% (OR=1.89 [1.52-2.35], p<0.001), 32.00% (OR=1.98 [1.66-2.37], p<0.001), 47.53%, and 51.08% (OR=2.40 [1.90-3.03], p<0.001) at 1-through-5-year follow-up, respectively. The 30-day major adverse events after elective EVAR were higher in octogenarians (OR=1.75-2.83, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians experience higher but acceptable peri-operative morbidity and mortality compared with younger patients. However, 3-year to 5-year survival is very low among octogenarians. Our findings challenge the notion of routine intervention in elderly patients and support very careful selection for elective EVAR. Many octogenarians with peri-threshold (<6 cm) AAAs may derive no benefit from EVAR due to limited 3-year to 5-year overall survival and low risk of aneurysm rupture with conservative management. An adjusted threshold for intervention in octogenarians may be warranted. CLINICAL IMPACT: Octogenarians with infra-renal AAA are increasingly managed with elective EVAR. Previous studies have demonstrated that EVAR is safer than open repair for octogenarians, with lower peri-operative mortality and major adverse events. However, randomised trials, on which much of contemporary evidence is based, recruited a relatively younger population of participants. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a contemporary synthesis of the literature comparing outcomes in octogenarians to younger patients. The results of this analysis, together with low rupture rates amongst octogenarians in existing literature, question the benefit of routine elective intervention for peri-threshold aneurysms and an adjusted threshold for intervention in octogenarians may be warranted.

Early Results From the Pivotal Trial Substudy of the GORE® EXCLUDER® Conformable Endoprosthesis in Angulated Necks.

OBJECTIVE OR BACKGROUND: To report the investigational device exemption (IDE) study 1-year clinical outcomes of the high neck angulation (HNA) substudy of the GORE® EXCLUDER® Conformable AAA Endoprosthesis (EXCC) for treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: This study is a prospective, multicenter clinical trial conducted in the United States and included core laboratory assessment of imaging and independent event adjudication. Anatomic criteria for enrollment in the HNA substudy included infrarenal aortic neck angulation >60° and ≤90° with aortic neck length ≥10 mm. Primary safety endpoints included blood loss >1000 mL, death, stroke, myocardial infarction, bowel ischemia, paraplegia, respiratory failure, renal failure, and thromboembolic events. Primary effectiveness endpoints included technical success, absence from Type I and III endoleak, migration (≥10 mm), sac enlargement (≥5 mm), sac rupture, and conversion to open repair. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and February 2022, 95 patients were enrolled in the HNA substudy across 35 sites. Of the 95 patients, 71 (74.7%) were male and the cohort average age was 74.4 years old. The mean infrarenal proximal aortic neck angle was 71.6° and mean AAA size was 62.9 mm. Overall technical success was achieved in 93 (97.9%) patients. Freedom from a primary safety endpoint through 30 days was 96.7%; 3 (3.3%) patients had blood loss >1000 mL. Freedom from the primary effectiveness at 12 months was achieved in 94.8%. Four (4.3%) patients had Type IA endoleak; intervention after the procedure was not required and no subsequent interventions or sac enlargement were noted in these patients. At 12 months, 29 (39.7%) patients experienced a Type II endoleak and 1 (1.3%) patient experienced AAA sac expansion ≥5mm. Through 12 months, 1 (1.3%) patient had a conversion to open surgical repair. There were no aneurysm-related deaths, ruptures, or migration through 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The IDE study demonstrates safety and effectiveness of the EXCC device in AAA with highly angulated necks (>60° and ≤90°) are preserved at the 12-month follow-up.

Retroperitoneal vs. Transperitoneal Approach for Non-Ruptured Open Conversion after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies comparing the transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approach for AAA repair suggest that the RP approach may result in lower rates of perioperative mortality and morbidity. However, data comparing these approaches for open conversion are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the association between the type of approach and outcomes following open conversion after EVAR. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent open conversion after EVAR between 2010-2022 in Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). Patients presenting with rupture were excluded. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality. The secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and 5-year mortality. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to adjust for factors with statistical or clinical significance. Logistic regression was used to assess perioperative mortality and complications in the weighted cohort. 5-year mortality was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 660 patients (39% RP) who underwent open conversion after EVAR. Compared with TP, RP patients were older (75 [IQR, 70-79] years vs. 73.5 [IQR, 68-79] years, p<.001), and more frequently had prior myocardial infarction (33% vs. 22%, p=.002). Compared with the TP approach, the RP approach was less frequently used in case of associated iliac aneurysm (19% vs. 27%, p=.026), but more frequently with associated renal bypass (7.8% vs. 1.7%, p<.001) and by high volume physicians (highest quintile, >7 AAA annually: 41% vs. 17%, p<.001) and in high volume centers (highest quintile, >35 AAA annually: 36% vs. 20%, p<.001). RP patients, compared with TP patients, were less likely to have external iliac or femoral distal anastomosis (8.2% vs. 21%, p<.001), and an infrarenal clamp (25% vs. 36%, p<.001). Unadjusted perioperative mortality was not significantly different between approaches (RP vs. TP: 3.8% vs. 7.5%; p=.077). After risk adjustment, RP patients had similar odds of perioperative mortality (aOR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.22-1.10; p=.082), and lower odds of intestinal ischemia (aOR, 0.26; 95%CI, 0.08-0.86; p=.028) and in-hospital reintervention (aOR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.22-0.85; p=.015). No significant differences were found in the other perioperative complications, and 5-year mortality (aHR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.47-1.32; p=.37). CONCLUSIONS: - Our findings suggest that the RP approach may be associated with lower adjusted odds of perioperative complications compared with the TP approach. The RP approach should be considered for open conversion after EVAR when feasible.

Early Experience With the Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE) in Managing Iliac Aneurysms.

Aim The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) devices and to examine their short-term outcomes. Materials and methods This was a descriptive, retrospective observational study involving 15 patients diagnosed with either aortoiliac or isolated iliac artery aneurysms and treated with an IBE device. Data were collected for patients who received IBE devices at Glan Clwyd Hospital in Rhyl, United Kingdom, from February 2020 to May 2023. Results Most patients presented with asymptomatic aneurysms; 86.7% (n = 13) had bilateral common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms. The mean diameter of the CIA was 38.7 ± 8.8 mm, and the mean diameter of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was 39.8 ± 23 mm. For the indications of IBE use, 60% (n = 9) of the patients had iliac aneurysms reaching the intervention threshold, 20% (n = 3) had AAA reaching the threshold, and 20% (n = 3) had aortoiliac aneurysms reaching the threshold. The majority of patients underwent bilateral femoral access (86.7%; n = 13), while 13.3% (n = 2) required both femoral and brachial access. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Aside from 20% (n = 3) of cases where the sac size remained static, the majority of patients (80%; n = 12) experienced sac regression. All patients were free from buttock claudication. A type II endoleak was observed in 33.3% (n = 5) of patients. No reinterventions were reported. The mean primary patency was 30.9 ± 0.7 months, and the follow-up period ranged from 12 to 36 months. Conclusions IBEs are an effective medical device, demonstrating a high rate of technical success, minimal need for additional procedures, and a low incidence of complications while maintaining a satisfactory rate of primary patency.

Sealing Zone Failure Decreases the Long Term Durability of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has higher long term aneurysm related mortality compared with open surgery, mainly due to aneurysm rupture. Loss of stent graft-vessel apposition at the EVAR sealing zones is a potential cause of post-EVAR rupture. This study aimed to investigate sealing zone failure and its relation to post-EVAR rupture. METHODS: This was a retrospective structured review of pre-operative and post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans of 399 consecutive patients treated with standard bifurcated EVAR. The primary outcome was total loss of seal at last post-operative CT. Secondary outcomes were partial loss of seal, standard follow up detection, post-EVAR rupture, aneurysm sac development, and endoleaks. RESULTS: During a median follow up of 5.3 years, total and partial loss of seal occurred in 85 (21.3%) and 78 (19.5%) patients, respectively. Initial mean sealing zone lengths were within current recommendations but decreased over time, mainly due to vessel dilatation. Mean proximal sealing length at one month CT was 15.5 ± 10.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.6 - 18.5 mm) in the group with total loss of seal, 14.3 ± 6.9 mm (95% CI 12.2 - 16.4 mm) with partial loss of seal, and 23.2 ± 7.4 mm (95% CI 22.3 - 24.0 mm) with preserved seal through follow up (p < .001). Mean iliac sealing lengths were 22.4 ± 12.1 mm (95% CI 18.9 - 25.8 mm) if total loss and 21.8 ± 10.0 mm (95% CI 19.6 - 24.0 mm) if partial loss of seal vs. 34.7 ± 12.4 mm (95% CI 33.8 - 35.7 mm) if preserved seal. Larger vessel diameters were associated with loss of seal both in proximal and distal sealing zones. During the study period, 13 post-EVAR ruptures occurred, all preceded by CT findings of total (n = 7) or partial (n = 6) loss of seal. Aneurysm sac expansion was seen in 40% of patients with total loss of seal, 18% with partial loss of seal, and 6.6% with preserved seal. CONCLUSION: Loss of seal after EVAR is frequent and associated with post-EVAR rupture. Increased recommended sealing zones lengths and focus on sealing zones in surveillance may reduce post-EVAR ruptures and aneurysm related mortality.

Real world experience with the TREO device in standard EVAR: Mid-term results of 150 cases from a German Multicenter study.

Background: The objective of the study was to analyze mid-term results of unselected patients treated with the TREO (Terumo Aortic, Florida, USA) device at six German hospital sites. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients treated within and outside instructions for use (IFU) from January 2017 to November 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and endograft related complications according to IFU status. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm/procedure related re-interventions. Results: 150 patients (92% male, mean age 73 ±8 years) were treated (within IFU 84% vs. outside IFU 16%) with the TREO device for abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=127 intact, n=17 symptomatic and n=6 ruptured; p=0.30). Technical success was achieved in 147/150 (within IFU 99% vs. outside IFU 92%, p=0.08). 30-day mortality was 2%, one year and overall mortality was 3% and 5%. During a mean follow-up of 28.4 months (range: 1-67.4 months), 35 (25%; within IFU 23% vs. outside IFU 35%, p=0.23) patients suffered from endoleaks. The majority were endoleaks type II (n=33), the remaining type Ia (n=5) and type Ib (n=3). No endoleaks type III-V, migrations or aneurysm ruptures occurred. Overall, 19 patients (13%; within IFU 13% vs. 15% outside IFU, p=0.70) received a secondary intervention: nine endoleak related endovascular procedures, three open conversions, two endograft limb related interventions, four surgical revisions of the femoral access sites and two bowl ischemia related procedures, respectively. Conclusions: This non industry-sponsored, multicenter trial indicates that using the TREO device in a real-world setting (both within and outside IFU) seems feasible in the treatment of patients suffering from AAA. While the rate of complications and secondary interventions is in line with previously published data, the findings highlight the fact that standard EVAR is associated with serious adverse events.

Feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Background: Endoleaks are common complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Computed tomographic angiography (CTA)/digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is considered the gold standard for evaluating contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) accuracy in the detection and classification of endoleaks. In recent years, CEUS has been widely used in this field. This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of CEUS in the detection and classification of endoleaks after EVAR. Methods: The data of 98 patients who underwent abdominal aorta CEUS from November 2017 to September 2023 in the ultrasound (US) department of Beijing Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent EVAR of AAA before CEUS and CTA/DSA, and had complete clinical data. The CEUS and CTA/DSA results were compared to detect endoleaks and categorize the specific types of endoleaks. Results: Among the 98 patients, 74 were male and 24 were female. The patients had an average age of 74.8±9.8 years (range, 43-90 years). Among the 98 patients, 37 (37.8%) endoleaks were detected by CEUS, of which 8 were type Ia, 2 were type Ib, 15 were type II, 7 were type III, 2 were type IV, 2 were type Ia combined with type III, and 1 was type II combined with type III. In addition, among these 98 patients, 39 (39.8%) endoleaks were detected by CTA/DSA, of which 8 were type Ia, 3 were type Ib, 18 were type II, 6 were type III, 2 were type Ia combined with type III, 1 was type II combined with type III, and 1 was type Ib combined with type II. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in the detection of endoleaks were 92.3% and 98.3%, respectively. CEUS and CTA/DSA had similar diagnostic efficacy and good consistency in the detection and classification of endoleaks (Kappa value: 0.914, P<0.01). Conclusions: CEUS has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection and classification of endoleaks following EVAR, and its diagnostic efficacy is similar to that of CTA/DSA. In addition, US is safe, non-invasive and repeatable, and thus is worthy of extensive clinical application.

Identifying barriers and facilitators to follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR): Qualitative study design and protocol.

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is now first line therapy for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) as it reduces perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to open surgery. However, up to 40 % of patients do not undergo recommended follow-up, increasing risk of subsequent rupture. Risk factors for loss to follow-up have been studied retrospectively, however, qualitative studies assessing perceived barriers and facilitators to follow-up have not been performed and there are few qualitative protocols within the vascular surgery literature. This article presents a qualitative descriptive study protocol aimed at understanding and improving post-operative follow-up adherence after EVAR developed through an iterative process based on the Theoretical Domains Framework of behavior change. Steps include:•Selection of target behavior and study design•Development of study materials, sampling/recruitment strategy, and data collection•Qualitative data analysis and reporting findingsWe demonstrate the feasibility of this study by pilot testing of the semi-structured interview guides on a small group of patients, healthcare providers, and key personnel. This protocol aims to describe key stakeholder experiences within the healthcare system that will ultimately serve as the basis for future multi-institutional research piloting intervention strategies to improve EVAR follow-up.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm with horseshoe kidney with central renal artery: A vascular dilemma.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm with concomitant horseshoe kidney is exceedingly rare. Although open repair was previously the treatment, endovascular aortic repair has become an increasingly popular option. In the current endovascular era, complex aortic pathologies are treatable with selective use of multiple advanced techniques. We present a unique case involving complex endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm complicated by presence of horseshoe kidney with central renal artery in a patient where an open approach was prohibited.

Differences in mortality and risk factors, two years after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms - Reassessment analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) increases with age. Elective intervention for AAA is critical to prevent rupture associated with very high mortality among older males. METHODS: The aim of this study was to address the impact of post-contrast acute kidney-PC-AKI injury among patients treated with endovascular repair of ruptured AAA-EVAR on outcomes such as new onset chronic kidney disease-CKD and mortality among patients within a two-year trial. RESULTS: The same study group (of n = 192 patients) underwent reassessment, two years after EVAR treatment. The overall mortality rate was 16.67%, and it was higher in the AKI group - 38.89%. CKD patients had a mortality rate of 23.88% (n = 16). Among patients with an aneurysm diameter >67 mm mortality rate reached 20% (n = 6), while in the previously reported diabetes mellitus group 37.93% (n = 11). New onset of CKD was diagnosed in 23% of cases. Preexisting CKD patients with PC- AKI contributed to a 33.33% mortality rate (n = 8). CONCLUSION: This study concludes that PC-AKI impacts outcomes and survival in endovascularly treated AAAs. Type 2 diabetes and preexisting chronic kidney disease are associated with higher mortality within a 2-year follow-up, however gender factor was not significant. A larger aneurysm diameter is related with a higher prevalence of PC-AKI. These factors should be taken into account during screening, qualifying patients for the treatment and treating patients with AAA. It may help to identify high-risk individuals and tailor preventive measurements and treatment options accordingly, improving treatment results and reducing mortality.

High proportion of undiagnosed diabetes in patients surgically treated for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: findings from the multicentre Norwegian Aortic Aneurysm and Diabetes (ABANDIA) Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the total prevalence of known and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM), and the association of DM with perioperative complications following elective, infrarenal, open surgical (OSR) or endovascular (EVAR), Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: In this Norwegian prospective multicentre study, 877 patients underwent preoperative screening for DM by HbA1c measurements from November 2017 to December 2020. Diabetes was defined as screening detected HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or previously diagnosed diabetes. The association of DM with in-hospital complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality rate were evaluated using adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: The total prevalence of DM was 15% (95% CI 13%,17%), of which 25% of the DM cases (95% CI 18%,33%) were undiagnosed upon admission for AAA surgery. The OSR to EVAR ratio was 52% versus 48%, with similar distribution among DM patients, and no differences in the prevalence of known and undiagnosed DM in the EVAR versus the OSR group. Total 30-day mortality rate was 0.6% (5/877). Sixty-six organ-related complications occurred in 58 (7%) of the patients. DM was not statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of in-hospital organ-related complications (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.57,2.39, p = 0.57), procedure-related complications (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.79,2.63, p = 0.20), 30-day mortality (p = 0.09) or length of stay (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88,1.28, p = 0.54). According to post-hoc-analyses, organ-related complications were more frequent in patients with newly diagnosed DM (n = 32) than in non-DM patients (OR 4.92; 95% CI 1.53,14.3, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Twenty-five percent of all DM cases were undiagnosed at the time of AAA surgery. Based on post-hoc analyses, undiagnosed DM seems to be associated with an increased risk of organ related complications following AAA surgery. This study suggests universal DM screening in AAA patients to reduce the number of DM patients being undiagnosed and to improve proactive diabetes care in this population. The results from post-hoc analyses should be confirmed in future studies.

Influence of Bridging Stent Graft Implantation into the Renal Artery during Complex Endovascular Aortic Procedures on the Renal Resistance Index.

Comparative sonographic examination of the renal resistance index (RRI) can provide evidence of renal artery stenosis. The extent to which the RRI is changed after stent graft implantation is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of stent graft implantation into non-diseased renal arteries during endovascular treatment of pararenal aortic aneurysms on the RRI. Sonographic examinations of the kidneys were conducted using a GE ultrasound system. The evaluation was performed according to the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2D standard criteria. RRI values were determined in consecutive patients on the day before and after stent graft implantation and compared for each kidney. A total of 32 consecutive patients (73.9 ± 8.2 years, 5 females, 27 males) were treated with a fenestrated or branched aortic stent graft including bridging stent graft implantations into both renal arteries and received pre- and postinterventional examinations. Sonomorphologically, the examined kidneys were inconspicuous. The arborisation of the renal perfusion was preserved pre- and post-implantation. The RRI did not differ (0.66 ± 0.06 versus 0.67 ± 0.07; p = ns). Successful stent graft implantation into non-stenosed renal arteries did not lead to a relevant change in RRI. Therefore, the RRI is a suitable tool for assessing renal perfusion after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic therapy.

Early and Mid-Term Results of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with the Cordis Incraft Ultra-Low Profile Endograft: A High-Volume Center Experience.

Background/Objectives: In recent years, manufacturers have developed new low-profile stent grafts to allow endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in patients with small access vessels. We evaluated the early and mid-term outcomes of the Incraft (Cordis Corp, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) ultra-low profile endograft implantation in a high-volume single center. Methods: Between 2014 and 2023, 133 consecutive endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures performed using the Incraft endograft were recorded in a prospective database. Indications included infrarenal aortic aneurysms, common iliac aneurysms, and infrarenal penetrating aortic ulcers. Mid-term results were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: During the study period, 133 patients were treated with the Cordis Incraft endograft, in both elective and urgent settings. The Incraft graft was the first choice for patients with hostile iliac accesses, a feature characterizing at least one side in 90.2% of the patients in the study cohort. The immediate technical success rate was 78.2%. The intraoperative endoleak rate was 51.9% (20.3% type 1 A, 0.8% type 1 B, and 30.8% type 2 endoleak). Within 30 days, technical and clinical success rates were both 99.3%; all type 1A and 1B endoleaks were resolved at the 30-day follow-up CT-angiogram. After a mean follow-up of 35.4 months, the actuarial freedom from the re-intervention rate was 96.0%, 91.1%, and 84.0% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The iliac leg patency rate was 97.1%, 94.1%, and 93.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between hostile and non-hostile access groups, nor between the groups with grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 access hostility. Conclusions: The ultra-low profile Cordis Incraft endograft represents a valid option for the endovascular treatment of AAA in patients with hostile iliac accesses. The procedure can be performed with high rates of technical and clinical success at 30 days and the rates of iliac branch occlusion observed during the follow-up period appear acceptable in patients with poor aorto-iliac outflow.

Simultaneous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR): A Preliminary Report.

Background: Performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) at the same time represents a groundbreaking development in the multidisciplinary treatment of cardiovascular disease. This combined PCI-EVAR approach bridges a critical gap by offering treatment for patients who have both coronary artery disease and aortic aneurysms. This innovative strategy exemplifies the evolving landscape of cardiovascular care, providing a new solution for complex clinical situations that previously required separate procedures. Methods: Six patients with critical coronary artery lesions and asymptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) ≥ 6 cm diameter, as well as one patient with critical coronary artery lesions and endoleak type 1A with aneurysms ≥ 6 cm, underwent simultaneous coronary artery revascularization through percutaneous intervention (PCI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The occurrence of any intraoperative or postoperative complication was considered to be the primary endpoint of the study, including the abortion or failure of either PCI or EVAR, bleeding requiring a conversion to open surgical procedures, the failure of local anesthesia, postoperative myocardial or lower limb ischemia, and a postoperative serum creatinine level of >125 mmol/L or of >180 mmol/L in patients affected by chronic renal failure. The overall length of the procedure, X-ray exposure, the quantity of iodine contrast medium administered, and the length of recovery were considered to be secondary endpoints. Results: Postoperative complications included two episodes of acute renal failure in the two patients already affected by chronic renal failure, which were easily resolved with adequate daily hydration and the elimination of nephrotoxic drugs. In no cases did cardiac ischemia or lower limb ischemia occur. The average procedure duration was 198 min (range: 180-240 min), the average fluoroscopy duration was 41.7 min (range: 35-50 min), the average amount of iodinated contrast medium was 34.8 mL (range: 30-40 mL), and the mean length of hospitalization was 2.7 days (range: 2-5 days). Conclusions: In selected patients, this surgical approach has demonstrated safety, reduced hospitalization times, minimized risks associated with complications from the untreated condition if procedures were performed at different times, and facilitated the effective management of intraoperative complications due to the presence of a multidisciplinary team. However, the limited number of patients necessitates further research.

Optimizing Femoral Access in Emergency EVAR with a Decision-Making Algorithm.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the preferred approach over open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) due to its minimally invasive nature. The common femoral artery (CFA) is the main access vessel for EVAR, with both surgical exposure and percutaneous access being utilized. However, in emergent cases, percutaneous access can be challenging and may result in complications such as bleeding or dissection thrombosis, leading to the need for surgical conversion. This study aimed to share experiences in implementing a decision-making algorithm to reduce surgical conversions due to percutaneous access failures. A total of 74 aortic patients treated with EVAR in emergency settings were included in this retrospective study. This study focused on various outcomes such as perioperative mortality, morbidity, procedure time, surgical exposure time, and surgical conversion rate. After the implementation of the decision-making algorithm, decreases in surgical conversions and operating time were observed. Percutaneous access was found to be more challenging in cases with specific anatomical characteristics of the CFA, such as severe atherosclerosis or smaller vessel diameter. This study highlighted the importance of carefully assessing patient anatomical features and utilizing a decision-making algorithm to optimize outcomes in EVAR procedures. Further research is needed to continue improving practices for managing aortic aneurysms and reducing complications in femoral artery access approaches.

An international, expert-based, Delphi consensus document on controversial issues in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: As a result of conflicting, inadequate or controversial data in the literature, several issues concerning the management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain unanswered. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to provide some guidance for clinicians on these controversial topics. METHODS: A three-round Delphi consensus document was produced with 44 experts on 6 prespecified topics regarding the management of AAAs. All answers were provided anonymously. The response rate for each round was 100%. RESULTS: Most participants (42 of 44 [95.4%]) agreed that a minimum case volume per year is essential (or probably essential) for a center to offer open or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). Furthermore, 33 of 44 (75.0%) believed that AAA screening programs are (probably) still clinically effective and cost effective. Additionally, most panelists (36 of 44 [81.9%]) voted that surveillance after EVAR should be (or should probably be) lifelong. Finally, 35 of 44 participants (79.7%) thought that women smokers should (or should probably/possibly) be considered for screening at 65 years of age, similar to men. No consensus was achieved regarding lowering the threshold for AAA repair and the need for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: This expert-based Delphi consensus document provides guidance for clinicians regarding specific unresolved issues. Consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting the need for further research in those areas.

Metformin Use and Long-term Outcomes Including Aneurysm Sac Dynamics Following EVAR for Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: "A Retrospective Study".

PURPOSE: Metformin, widely used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM), has shown potential for inhibiting abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth by reducing extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammation. However, its influence on clinical outcomes and aneurysm sac dynamics after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains uncertain. This retrospective study aims to explore the effects of metformin on long-term outcomes following EVAR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent elective standard EVAR for infrarenal AAA at a single academic Dutch hospital from 2000 to 2022 were included. We collected baseline patient demographics, comorbid conditions, anatomical and operative characteristics, and 30-day postoperative events. Metformin use was defined as using it preceding EVAR. The primary outcome, the postoperative aneurysm sac volume over time, was investigated using linear mixed-effects modeling. The secondary outcomes, 8-year all-cause mortality and freedom from graft-related events, were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: We analyzed 685 patients, including 634 (93%) non-metformin users and 51 (7%) metformin users. The median follow-up period was similar (4.0 years [IQR=1.5, 6.5] vs 5.0 years [IQR=2.0, 8.0]; p=0.091). Patients on metformin had a preoperative aneurysm sac volume of 153 cc (IQR=114, 195) compared with 178 cc (IQR=133, 240) for non-metformin patients (p=0.054). At 30 days post-EVAR, metformin patients had a comparable mean aneurysm sac volume compared with non-metformin patients (metformin: -19.4 cc [95% confidence interval [CI]: -47.4, 8.5]; p=0.173). The effect of metformin on aneurysm growth over time was not significant (-3.9 cc/year; [95% CI: -22.7, 14.9]; p=0.685). Following risk-adjusted analysis, metformin use was associated with similar rates of all-cause mortality (metformin vs no metformin: 50% vs 44%; hazard ratio [HR]=1.11, 95% CI: 0.66, 1.88; p=0.688) and freedom from graft-related events (metformin vs no metformin: 63% vs 66%; HR=1.82, 95% CI: 0.98, 3.38; p=0.059). CONCLUSION: Although metformin use may reduce preoperative AAA growth, it does not seem to influence overall/long-term post-EVAR AAA sac dynamics, all-cause mortality, or freedom from graft-related events. These findings suggest that the potential protective effect of metformin on AAA may not be sustained after EVAR. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying the potential role of metformin in AAA management following EVAR. CLINICAL IMPACT: There is currently no approved pharmacological treatment available to slow the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth rate and reduce the related risk of rupture. In our retrospective analysis including 685 patients undergoing EVAR for infrarenal AAA, we found that metformin use was not associated with improved post-EVAR outcomes, such as a reduction of aneurysm sac volume over time, eight-year all-cause mortality, or freedom of graft-related events. These findings suggest that the potential protective effect of metformin on AAA may not be sustained after EVAR and underscore the need for ongoing research into this area.

Exploring Type IIIb Endoleaks: A Literature Review to Identify Possible Physical Mechanisms and Implications.

Endoleaks are common complications following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). They can be classified into low-pressure and high-pressure endoleaks. High-pressure endoleaks, which include Type I and Type III endoleaks, pose a significant risk of rupture and require urgent treatment. The aim of our study is to review published case reports and case series to assess the impact of Type IIIb endoleaks in EVAR and to identify possible mechanisms contributing to these endoleaks. This review targeted case reports and case series published between January 1998 and December 2022. A total of 62 case reports and case series were identified, encompassing 156 patients with Type IIIb endoleaks. Data collection was performed by three consultants who thoroughly discussed each report before registering it into an analyzable data set. Our analysis revealed that, beyond material imperfections, certain endograft configurations or conformations, endograft redundancy, and the physical forces acting on the grafts may lead to increased stress on specific parts of the endografts, potentially exceeding their design limits. Factors contributing to redundancy and unfavorable conformation of the endograft include secondary interventions for any cause (such as other types of endoleaks), EVAR performed outside the instructions for use (IFUs), endograft migrations, or larger initial aneurysm diameter.

Preoperative anemia is a risk factor for worse 30-day outcomes in both open and endovascular repair of non-ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a highly prevalent condition potentially linked to chronic inflammation. Preoperative anemia is an independent risk factor across many surgical fields. However, the relationship between anemia and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of preoperative anemia on 30-day outcomes of non-ruptured infrarenal AAA repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal AAA were identified in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted databases from 2012 to 2021. Anemia was defined as preoperative hematocrit less than 39% in males and 36% in females. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes between anemic and non-anemic patients, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, indications, aneurysm extents, operation time, and surgical approaches. RESULTS: There were 408 (22.13%) anemic and 1436 (77.88%) non-anemic patients who underwent OSR for non-ruptured AAA, while 3586 (25.20%) patients with and 10,644 (74.80%) without anemia underwent EVAR. In both OSR and EVAR, anemic patients had higher risks of bleeding requiring transfusion (OSR, aOR = 2.446, p < .01; EVAR, aOR = 3.691, p < .01), discharge not to home (OSR, aOR = 1.385, p = .04; EVAR, aOR = 1.27, p < .01), and 30-day readmission (OSR, aOR = 1.99, p < .01; EVAR, aOR = 1.367, p < .01). Also, anemic patients undergoing OSR had higher pulmonary events (aOR = 2.192, p < .01), sepsis (aOR = 2.352, p < .01), and venous thromboembolism (aOR = 2.913, p = .01), while in EVAR, anemic patients had higher mortality (aOR = 1.646, p = .01), cardiac complications (aOR = 1.39, p = .04), renal dysfunction (aOR = 1.658, p = .02), and unplanned reoperation (aOR = 1.322, p = .01). Moreover, in both OSR and EVAR, anemic patients had longer hospital length of stay (p < .01). CONCLUSION: In OSR and EVAR, preoperative anemia was independently associated with worse 30-day outcomes. Preoperative anemia could be a useful marker for risk stratification for patients undergoing infrarenal AAA repair.

Appropriate management of the small abdominal aortic aneurysm.

There is variation in the management of small aneurysms in the United States today, with some surgeons moving forward with elective repair and others practice ongoing surveillance. Literature exists to suggest that small aneurysms are repaired at a higher rate than should be considered acceptable, and this represents a deviation from current standards of care. To best understand the optimal care of this patient population, this article aims to evaluate the current management of small aneurysms, review contemporary guidelines and the literature behind them, and assess the appropriateness of surgical management of small aneurysms.