Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on admission for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on admission for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia (EA). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to address covariates. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were implemented in sequence to find out the factors influencing intrapartum fever. The receiver operating characteristics curve was applied to determine the area under the curve (AUC) of NLR for intrapartum fever. RESULTS: NLR and duration of EA were independent risk factors for intrapartum fever. The AUC of the combined indicator (NLR + duration of EA) was higher than that of NLR (AUC = 0.583, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.64) and duration of EA (AUC = 0.702, 95% CI 0.66-0.75), reaching 0.715 (95% CI 0.67-0.76; p < 0.001). NLR increased predictive performance for intrapartum fever when added to the duration of EA (net reclassification index 0.076, p = 0.022; integrated discrimination improvement 0.020, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: NLR has limited predictive power for intrapartum fever. The combination of NLR and duration of epidural analgesia may be considered a promising predictor for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia. SYNOPSIS: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an accessible predictor for the early identification of parturients at risk of intrapartum fever.

Comparative analysis of contrast distribution in cervical epidural steroid injections utilizing a modified paramedian interlaminar approach with varied needle tip positions: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections have given rise to the modified paramedian interlaminar (mPIL) approach. The objective of this study was to perform an analysis of the contrast spread pattern within the cervical epidural space, taking into account different needle tip positions in the mPIL approach. METHODS: A total of 48 patients were included in the study and randomly assigned to either the medial or lateral group based on the needle tip's position in the anterior-posterior view. The primary outcome measured was the contrast flow under fluoroscopic visualization. As a secondary outcome, we analyzed the location of the needle tip position in both lateral and contralateral oblique views. Clinical effectiveness was assessed by measuring pain intensity and functional disability post-procedure. RESULTS: Significant disparities were noted in the ventral distribution of contrast between the medial and lateral groups. In the lateral images, needle tips in the lateral group were positioned more ventrally compared to those in the medial group. Both groups exhibited statistically significant improvements in neck and radicular pain, as well as functional status, 4 weeks after treatment, with no significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the ventral dispersion of contrast material during cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections using the mPIL approach may vary depending on the needle tip location.

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses of 0.1% Ropivacaine Versus 0.2% Ropivacaine for the Maintenance of Epidural Analgesia in Labor.

Objective The gold standard for pain management during labor is epidural analgesia, which can be administered in two different ways to the parturients, either by bolus doses or continuous infusions of local anesthetic solutions with opioids. Recently, programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEBs) via a pump are gaining popularity as a very effective method with minimal side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimum ropivacaine concentration between two different regimens (0.1% or 0.2% both with fentanyl 2 µg/ml) that can provide satisfactory analgesia with the minimum degree of motor blockade, using PIEBs. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was performed from March 2020 to March 2022. Two different concentrations of ropivacaine 0.1% and 0.2% via PIEBs were equally allocated to two groups of parturients with an additional patient control epidural rescue bolus if needed. Our primary endpoint was motor blockade, as assessed by the modified Bromage scale (MBS). We also recorded visual analog scale (VAS) scores, heart rate, blood pressure, total local anesthetic consumption, labor duration and method of delivery, and APGAR score of the newborns. Results All patients presented Bromage scores equal to 6, and the total consumption of the anesthetic solution was comparable between the two groups. Women in the 0.2% group showed higher pain relief and satisfaction compared to the 0.1% group. Concerning the 0,2% group, diastolic blood pressure and APGAR scores were lower alongside with a lower satisfactory extrusion stage observed by the obstetrician. Conclusion Both ropivacaine regimens provide satisfactory labor epidural analgesia for the expectant mother without any motor blockade.

Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Dexamethasone, Methylprednisolone and Betamethasone in Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.

BACKGROUND: Particulate steroids are thought to exert their effects for long durations at injection sites. However, these types of steroids carry higher risks when used in epidural steroid injections. Catastrophic spinal cord complications, including sudden-onset paraplegia, have been reported due to intravascular particulate steroid preparations that cause embolisms and occlusion of blood vessels, resulting in spinal cord infarctions. Clinicians, therefore, recommend nonparticulate steroids to mitigate these adverse events. To our knowledge, this is the first retrospective study that addresses the effectiveness and safety of methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, and betamethasone when used in transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this study was to compare the proportion of patients who received injections of particulate steroids and required zero repeat injections within 12 months of their initial injection to the proportion of patients who received injections of nonparticulate steroids and also required zero repeat injections, as well as to compare the number of patients in the particulate cohort who required one or more repeat injections within 12 months of their initial injection to the number of patients in the nonparticulate cohort who required the same. The secondary goal was to evaluate the proportion of patients ultimately requiring surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-center, IRB-approved, retrospective study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of nonparticulate as compared to particulate steroid medications when used in TFESIs as minimally invasive treatments for chronic lumbar radiculopathy. SETTING: This study captured data (n = 1717) over a 4-year time frame (01/15/2018 to 01/15/2022). METHODS: The following data were collected from each patient's chart: age, gender, BMI, race, date of initial injection, number of repeat injections at the same lumbosacral level and on the same side within 12 months of the initial injection, and lumbar surgery date (if applicable). Inclusion criteria included: 1) having chronic low back pain of radicular etiology; 2) being at least 18 years old; 3) having experienced the failure of conservative therapy after 12 weeks (including physical therapy and/or medications); 4) having positive physical exam findings supporting nerve impingement (straight leg raise, slump test); and 5) showing lumbar MRI evidence of nerve impingement from disc herniation. Exclusion criteria included: 1) having received prior lumbar surgery at any level (L1-S1); 2) having been given prior TFESIs fewer than 6 months prior to initial injection; 3) having contracted a systemic infection at the proposed injection site; 4) undergoing active cancer treatment; and 5) having gotten any other spine injections. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of patients in the nonparticulate steroid cohort received 0 repeat injections (87.5% vs 71.4%, P < 0.001). The particulate steroid cohort demonstrated a significantly greater proportion of patients who received repeat injections within 12 months after the initial injections (12.5% vs 29.6%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among patients requiring surgery between the 2 cohorts. Other outcome measures included the identification of risk factors significantly associated with repeat injections. There was a statistically significant weak positive correlation between age and repeat injections (Pearson corr = 0.102; P < 0.001) and a weak negative correlation between ethnicity/race and repeat injections (point-biserial corr = -0.093; P < 0.001).  No adverse events were reported. LIMITATIONS: Not all clinicians included in this study used each of the 3 steroid types, and all clinicians used either particulate or nonparticulate steroids exclusively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the clinical outcomes associated with TFESIs of nonparticulate steroids are superior to those associated with TFESIs of particulate steroids when either variety of medication is used to treat lumbar radiculopathy. This is the first study to include a clinically useful predictive model using information on laterality, age, and steroid type.

Intracranial complications secondary to acute bacterial sinusitis requiring neurosurgical intervention before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial complications of acute bacterial sinusitis are rare pathologies that occur in children, and are associated with significant neurological morbidity and mortality. There is a subjective concern among neurosurgeons that the incidence of this rare disease has increased since the onset of the novel COVID-19 pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to review the presentation and management of patients admitted at the authors' institution with intracranial extension of sinusitis, to better understand the local disease burden relative to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational cohort study. The patients underwent neurosurgical intervention for intracranial extension of sinusitis between January 1, 2007, and March 1, 2023. The historical cohort was defined as those patients who presented prior to March 2020. Clinical covariates such as surgical and microbiological data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients (55 historical, 23 new) were included; they had a median age of 11.7 years and a male predominance of 69.2%. There was a significant increase in the annual rate of neurosurgical intervention for suppurative intracranial extension of acute bacterial sinusitis after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with an average of 4.2 cases per year prior to March 2020 compared to 7.7 cases per year after that date (p = 0.013). This increase was largely driven by the unprecedented case volume of 13 cases in 2022. Patients in the new cohort were older (p = 0.009) and more likely to have Pott's puffy tumor/frontal bone osteomyelitis (p = 0.003) at the time of presentation than patients in the historical cohort. Patients in the new cohort had lower rates of readmission within 30 days of discharge than those in the historical cohort (p = 0.047). In both cohorts, patients with seizure on presentation were more likely to have neurological sequelae at last follow-up (p = 0.004), which occurred at a median of 2.9 months after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians encountering pediatric patients presenting with persistent symptoms of acute bacterial sinusitis must have a high index of suspicion for suppurative intracranial extension. Prompt neuroimaging and subsequent neurosurgical intervention are critical to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment. The results in this study show a significant increase in the number of neurosurgical interventions for suppurative intracranial extension of sinusitis per year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is needed to understand the underlying pathophysiology of this clinical phenomenon.

Good outcome with conservative treatment of delayed spinal epidural hematoma following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a rare case report.

BACKGROUND: Delayed spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) following central neuraxial block (CNB) is a rare but serious complication. The underlying causes of SEH associated with neuraxial anesthesia are still unclear. Furthermore, the decision between surgical intervention and conservative management for SEH remains a complex and unresolved issue. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of delayed SEH in a 73-year-old woman who underwent vaginal hysterectomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, with the administration of postoperative anticoagulants to prevent deep vein thrombosis on the 1st postoperative day (POD). She experienced symptoms 56 h after CNB. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a dorsal SEH at the L1-L4 level with compression of the thecal sac. On conservative treatment, full recovery was achieved after six months. CONCLUSIONS: This case reminds anesthesiologists should be alert to the possible occurrence of a delayed SEH following CNB, particularly with the administration of anticoagulants. Immediate neurological evaluation of neurological deficit and MRI are advised. Conservative treatment combined with close and dynamic neurological function monitoring may be feasible for patients with mild or nonprogressive symptoms even spontaneous recovery.

Combined impact of local anaesthetic infiltration through wound catheter and epidural analgesia following surgical hepatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Introduction: A meta-analysis was performed to examine the effects of wound catheter (WC) local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI) and epidural analgesia (EA) in open hepatectomy (OH). Material and methods: A systematic literature review was performed, which found 350 subjects with OH at the baseline of the studies; 159 of them were treated with WC local anaesthetic infiltration, and 191 used EA. Results: WC LAI substantially reduced the functional recovery time (MD = -0.64; 95% CI, -1.02 to -0.26, p < 0.001) and increased the pain score on the second postoperative day (MD = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.10-0.40, p < 0.001) compared to EA in OH patients. WC LAI did not vary from EA in OH patients in second postoperative opiate use (MD = -14.86; 95% CI: -32.88 to 3.16, p = 0.11) or overall complication rate (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.41-1.04, p = 0.07). Conclusions: WC LAI showed a non-significant difference in opiate consumption on the second postoperative day and in the overall complication rate, compared with EA, but it showed a lower functional recovery time and higher pain score.

Epidural analgesia during surgery and its relation to postoperative myocardial infarction: meta-analysis.

Introduction: Epidural analgesia has been studied for its potential advantages after surgery in a number of randomized clinical trials, with most finding improvements in pain and secondary endpoints like the incidence of postoperative complications. Aim: To assess the relationship between use of epidural analgesia and adverse cardiac outcomes expressed by myocardial infarction (MI). Material and methods: Fifty-three studies were recruited to quantify the influence of different surgical-related analgesic methods on clinical parameters (mortality and adverse events). The results of these trials were analysed using a random effects model, which was then used to calculate the mean difference (MD) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Epidural analgesia resulted in preferred cardiac outcomes compared with traditional analgesia. These findings were supported by significantly lower MI events for the epidural analgesia group as follows: p = 0.005, p = 0,007, and p = 0.03 for the total number of included studies, studies with high risk of bias, and studies with low risk of bias, respectively. Studies with intermediate risk showed a non-significant difference between both groups (p = 0.7). Conclusions: Epidural analgesia has a significant protective cardiac effect through the reduction of postoperative MI events among surgery subjects.

Risk factors for postpartum urinary retention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting reports on the factors that increase the likelihood of postpartum urinary retention (PUR). OBJECTIVES: We completed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the risk factors for PUR. SEARCH STRATEGY: An exhaustive search of the literature was undertaken using multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify pertinent studies published up until November 4, 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Observational studies that provided outcomes to calculate the risk factors for PUR were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two investigators separately performed the extraction of pertinent data from the articles. The risk factors for PUR were identified by pooling adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity test, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed. MAIN RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 21 studies with a total of 36 951 participants. Meta-analysis was performed for 14 risk factors, and eight of these were statistically significant. The risk factors that were identified in this review included instrumental delivery (OR, 2.96 [95% CI, 1.82-4.80]; 95% prediction interval [PI], 0.67-12.98), relatively long duration of labor (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.06]; 95% PI, 1.00-1.08), episiotomy (OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.19-2.06] 95% PI, 0.64-3.83), nulliparity (OR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.30-1.84]; 95% PI, 0.94-2.77), epidural analgesia (OR, 2.99 [95% CI, 1.78-5.03]; 95% PI, 0.53-16.76), labor augmentation (OR, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.49-3.28]; 95% PI, 0.12-39.26), labor induction (OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.12-2.66]; 95% PI, 0.40-7.39), and perineal injury (OR, 2.75 [95% CI, 1.95-3.89]; 95% PI, 1.10-6.92). CONCLUSION: Instrumental delivery, extended labor duration, episiotomy, nulliparity, epidural analgesia, labor augmentation/induction, and perineal injury are significant risk factors for PUR. The findings could help physicians identify patients at risk in the postpartum setting.

Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia and epidural morphine for post-cesarean section analgesia: experience from a tertiary center in China.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and epidural morphine (EM) for post-cesarean section analgesia in real-world experience from China. METHODS: Parturients receiving one dose of EM (1-2 mg), PCEA, or both EM and PCEA from Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively recruited. Logistic models were used to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Of 1079 parturients enrolled, 919 (85.2%) parturients received only EM, 105 (9.7%) parturients received PCEA, and 55 (5.1%) parturients received both EM and PCEA. Significantly more parturients from EM group requested supplementary analgesia than those from PCEA and PCEA + EM group (583, 63.4% vs 52, 49.5% vs 25, 45.5%, P = 0.001) with more times of supplementary analgesia (1, IQR: 0-2 vs 0, IQR: 0-1 vs 0, IQR: 0-1 times, P < 0.001) and larger amounts of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (50, IQR: 0-100 mg vs 0, IQR: 0-50 mg vs 0, IQR: 0-50 mg, P < 0.001). In multivariable Logistic regression for the supplementary analgesia risk, the application of PCEA (OR: 0.557, 95%CI 0.396-0.783, P = 0.001) and the use of NSAIDs intraoperatively (OR: 2.996, 95%CI 1.811-4.957, P < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors. A total of 1040 (96.4%) patients received prophylactic antiemetic therapy during surgery. Only 13 (1.2%) and 7 (0.6%) patients in our cohort requested antiemetic and antipruritic drugs, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of PCEA was an independent protective factor for supplementary analgesia during the post-cesarean section. Prophylactic antiemetic therapy may reduce the side effects of post-cesarean analgesia.

Prevalence, clinical presentation, and treatment-management of cerebral venous thrombosis associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension: A combined case-series and systematic literature review approach.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare complication of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Therefore, its correct diagnosis and the corresponding optimal treatment-management identification remains challenging. METHODS: Over the last 10 years, 300 patients received a definite SIH diagnosis at our stroke center. Through thorough review of the database, we identified all patients with SIH-related CVT. In addition, we performed a systematic literature review including all publications on SIH-related CVT. RESULTS: Five out of our 300 SIH patients showed CVT (F/M:2/3, mean age: 51.8 ± 15.7). Through the literature search, 72 additional cases were identified. Overall, the prevalence was 1.3% and main clinical presentations were orthostatic headache, nausea, and vomiting. The CVT was predominantly located at the superior sagittal sinus. Treatment strategies included anticoagulants (ACs) (43%), epidural blood patch (EBP) (19.4%), and combined AC + EBP (33.3%). In our cohort, all but one patient received combined EBP and AC. The mean clinical and radiological follow-up were 2 years and 1.5 years, respectively. Complete clinical recovery was reported in 96% of the cases, whereas 56% showed complete radiological CVT resolution. Among patients without radiological resolution (26.4%), 57% received AC-only, while 43% received combined AC + EBP. Of our five cases, all but one patient received combined AC + EBP. CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of SIH-related CVT was 1.3%. AC and combined AC + EBP were the most used treatment-management strategies. CVT resolution was more commonly achieved after the combined strategy. Overall, the rate of complete clinical recovery was 96%.

Postdural Puncture Headaches in Pediatric Patients: A Review of Options When Repeated Epidural Blood Patches Do Not Work.

We present the case of an adolescent with refractory postdural puncture headache (PDPH), whose symptoms resolved with a sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) nerve block using a J-tip style catheter. Our patient was treated with multiple modalities, including conservative and medical management, multiple epidural blood patches, and different nerve blocks. We discussed different treatments for the PDPH, why each modality did not work, and why our SPG block with a J-tip catheter possibly provided a better sympathetic block in a patient with intractable PDPH for two weeks.

Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Discovered Following Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare complication of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). We encountered a case where SIH was discovered after the diagnosis of CVT, suggesting the occurrence of CVT during the acute phase of SIH. We report this rare case of isolated cortical vein thrombosis in the acute phase of SIH. A 48-year-old woman taking low-dose oral contraceptives presented with neck pain, headache, and right-sided weakness. Magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography confirmed isolated cortical vein thrombosis. No other specific imaging abnormalities were noted. The patient was initially treated with anticoagulation. Subsequent worsening of her orthostatic headache led to the diagnosis of SIH, with diffuse dural enhancement on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. An epidural blood patch was performed, resulting in a favorable outcome with no neurological deficits. Although CVT can occur in the acute phase of SIH, particularly in patients with thrombophilia, the lack of characteristic imaging findings associated with SIH often complicates the diagnosis.

Hyperacute epidural hematoma following ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: A fatal case presentation and discussion of management strategies.

INTRODUCTION: An Epidural hematoma following a Ventriculoperitoneal shunt is a critically rare complication. Due to that rarity and potential dangers, we present a case where the patient became symptomatic 8 h after shunting requiring craniotomy for evacuation of the hematoma. The literature and treatment options were discussed. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old male arrived to the emergency department in a comatose state with dilated pupils, 8 h post-ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Computed tomography showed a massive hyperacute epidural hematoma causing severe midline deviation and subfalcine herniation, leading to emergency craniotomy. Despite surgical intervention and intensive care, the patient's condition did not improve, resulting in his death. DISCUSSION: Epidural hematomas (EDHs) are an infrequent complication of ventricular drainage procedures, occurring at a documented frequency of 0.4 %, often presenting with symptoms mimicking shunt malfunction or mass lesions. Diagnosis involves computed tomography (CT) scans, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be more sensitive. Treatment options include conservative management and surgical intervention, with prognosis heavily dependent on the patient's neurological status at the time of surgery, with mortality rates varying based on level of consciousness. CONCLUSION: This study presents a rare case of fatal hyperacute epidural hematoma following Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement in a 40-year-old man, highlighting the importance of early detection and intervention. The hypotheses suggests overloaded pressure on the dura during ventricular end insertion. Despite available treatment options, patient prognosis depends on neurological status at the time of surgery, emphasizing the need for further research into effective management strategies for this complication.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracic epidural analgesia versus other analgesic techniques in patients post-oesophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer surgery represents a high perioperative risk of complications to patients, such as postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Postoperative analgesia may influence these risks, but the most favourable analgesic technique is debated. This review aims to provide an updated evaluation of whether thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has benefits compared to other analgesic techniques in patients undergoing oesophagectomy surgery. Our hypothesis is that TEA reduces pain scores and PPCs compared to intravenous opioid analgesia in patients post-oesophagectomy. METHODS: Electronic databases PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomised trials of analgesic interventions in patients undergoing oesophagectomy surgery. Only trials including thoracic epidural analgesia compared with other analgesic techniques were included. The primary outcome was a composite of respiratory infection, atelectasis and respiratory failure (PPCs), with pain scores at rest and on movement as secondary outcomes. Data was pooled using random effect models and reported as relative risks (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Data from a total of 741 patients in 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 1993 to 2023 were included. Nine trials were open surgery, and one trial was laparoscopic. Relative to intravenous opioids, TEA significantly reduced a composite of PPCs (risk ratio (RR) 3.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.98-7.61; n = 222; 3 RCTs) and pain scores (0-100-mm visual analogue scale or VAS) at rest at 24 h (MD 9.02; 95% CI 5.88-12.17; n = 685; 10 RCTs) and 48 h (MD 8.64; 95% CI 5.91-11.37; n = 685; 10 RCTs) and pain scores on movement at 24 h (MD 14.96; 95% CI 5.46-24.46; n = 275; 4 RCTs) and 48 h (MD 16.60; 95% CI 8.72-24.47; n = 275; 4 RCTs). CONCLUSIONS: Recent trials of analgesic technique in oesophagectomy surgery are restricted by small sample size and variation of outcome measurement. Despite these limitations, current evidence indicates that thoracic epidural analgesia reduces the risk of PPCs and severe pain, compared to intravenous opioids in patients following oesophageal cancer surgery. Future research should include minimally invasive surgery, non-epidural regional techniques and record morbidity, using core outcome measures with standardised endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023484720).

Comparative analysis of the analgesic effects of intercostal nerve block, ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block, and epidural block following single-port thoracoscopic lung surgery.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we compared the analgesic effects of intercostal nerve block (ICNB), ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block (PVB), and epidural block (EB) following single-port thoracoscopic lung surgery. METHOD: A total of 120 patients who underwent single-hole thoracoscopic lung surgery were randomly and equally divided into three groups: ICNB group, the PVB group, and the EB group. ICNB was performed under direct thoracoscopic visualization before the conclusion of the surgery in the ICNB group, while PVB and EB were performed after general anesthesia in the PVB and EB groups, respectively. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was used following the surgery in all the groups. The following indicators were recorded: Intraoperative sufentanil dosage, anesthesia awakening time, postoperative intubation time, nerve block operation time, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during resting and coughing at regular intervals of 0, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h, the time until first PCIA, number of effective compressions within 24 h postoperatively, number of rescue analgesia interventions, and the side effects. RESULTS: In comparison to the ICNB group, the PVB and EB groups had a lower intraoperative sufentanil dosage, significantly shorter anesthesia awakening time, and postoperative intubation time, but longer nerve block operation time, lower VAS scores when resting and coughing within 24 h postoperatively (all p-values less than 0.05). Conversely, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS scores during resting and coughing after 24 h (all p-values greater than 0.05). Time to first PCIA, number of effective compressions and number of rescue analgesia at the 24-hour mark postoperatively were significantly better in the PVB and EB groups than that in the ICNB group (P < 0.05). However, there was a higher incidence of side effects observed in the EB group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The analgesic effect of PVB and EB following single-port thoracoscopic lung surgery is better than that of ICNB. PVB causes fewer side effects and complications and is safer and more effective.

Distinguishing Cerebral Infarction With Neck Pain and Hemiparesis From Cervical Spinal Epidural Hematoma Without MRI: A Case Report.

In patients presenting neck pain and hemiparesis, differentiation between cerebral infarction and cervical spinal epidural hematoma is vital yet challenging, particularly when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not feasible. A 59-year-old woman presented with a sudden onset of left-sided hemiparesis and neck pain. MRI was contraindicated because the patient underwent embolization in childhood. Head computed tomography (CT) revealed no evidence of hemorrhage or early ischemic signs. Cervical CT revealed no evidence of hematoma within the spinal canal. Myelography and CT myelography revealed no significant cervical spine abnormalities. The diagnosis was cerebral infarction. Cervical spine MRI is the gold standard examination for diagnosing cervical spinal epidural hematoma, but cervical spine CT, myelography, and CT myelography may be useful when MRI is contraindicated.

Relationship between epidural catheter migration beneath the skin and subcutaneous fat thickness assessed using postoperative CT imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: The causes of epidural catheter migration beneath the skin have not been previously investigated. We hypothesized that greater subcutaneous fat thickness might be associated with increased catheter migration beneath the skin. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone combined general and epidural anesthesia, selecting individuals who received thoracic and abdominal CT scans within the first 5 postoperative days. Needle depth was defined as the distance from the needle tip to the skin surface when the anesthesiologist determined that the needle tip had reached the epidural space. We measured the length of the epidural catheter from the skin surface to the epidural space (catheter length), and subcutaneous fat thickness (fat thickness) using CT imaging. Migration distance was calculated by subtracting needle depth from catheter length. RESULTS: We analyzed 127 patients (72 males), all undergoing epidural catheter insertion in the left lateral decubitus position via a paramedian approach. The median age of the patients was 71 years. Epidural catheters were postoperatively found to substantially curve beneath the skin. Regression analysis revealed no significant influence of fat thickness on catheter length (regression coefficient 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 0.17, 0.38). However, it indicated a positive correlation between fat thickness and needle depth (regression coefficient 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.70), and a negative correlation between fat thickness and migration distance (regression coefficient - 0.40, 95% CI: - 0.65, - 0.14). CONCLUSION: We found a negative correlation between epidural catheter migration beneath the skin and subcutaneous fat thickness. Anesthesiologists should be aware of the possibility of substantial subcutaneous curving of the catheter, especially in patients with scant subcutaneous fat.

Application of dezocine patient-controlled epidural analgesia in postoperative analgesia in patients with total myomectomy.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are common benign gynecological conditions. Patients who experience excessive menstruation, anemia, and pressure symptoms should be administered medication, and severe cases require a total hysterectomy. This procedure is invasive and causes severe postoperative pain, which can affect the patient's postoperative sleep quality and, thus, the recovery process. AIM: To evaluate use of dezocine in patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing total myomectomy. METHODS: We selected 100 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids and randomized them into two groups: A control group receiving 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.06 mg/mL of morphine and an observation group receiving 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.3 mg/mL of diazoxide in their PCEA. Outcomes assessed included pain levels, sedation, recovery indices, PCEA usage, stress factors, and sleep quality. RESULTS: The observation group showed lower visual analog scale scores, shorter postoperative recovery indices, fewer mean PCEA compressions, lower cortisol and blood glucose levels, and better polysomnographic parameters compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The cumulative incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dezocine PCEA can effectively control the pain associated with total myomectomy, reduce the negative impact of stress factors, and have less impact on patients' sleep, consequently resulting in fewer adverse effects.