Effect of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter in Patients Undergoing Abdominal and Thoracic Surgeries with Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Urinary Retention.

Background: Postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an integral aspect of pain management after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. Under TEA, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is frequently noted, prompting a common practice of maintaining the transurethral catheter (UC) until the cessation of TEA to avoid the necessity for reinsertion of the UC. This study analyzes the effect of an early bladder catheter removal during TEA on POUR incidence. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on 71 patients undergoing elective abdominal and thoracic operations with TEA for postoperative pain control. Patients were divided into two groups based on the UC removal time in relation to the epidural catheter removal. In the early removal group (ERG), the UC was removed within 3 days of surgery, while in the standard group (SG), it was removed after completion of TEA. All patients in the ERG were still receiving TEA at the time of the UC removal. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of POUR, while secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI), hospital length of stay (LOS), and patient's comfort. Results: The overall prevalence of POUR was 7%, with five POUR cases - two (4.9%) of 41 patients in SG and three (10%) of 30 in ERG (p = 0.644). No significant difference was found in POUR occurrence between ERG and SG (p = 0.644). Additionally, no UTIs were observed in the study. The postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]) 72 h and 96 h and the LOS (SG: 16.74 [±8.39] days; ERG: 14.53 [±6.99] days; p = 0.3) were similar between both study groups. Conclusion: Based on our results, it can be concluded that the removal of UC in the early postoperative period, even during TEA, can be performed safely without significantly increasing the risk of recatheterization.

The perfusion index as a method of assessing epidural anaesthesia efficacy in healthy dogs.

Introduction: Perfusion index (PI) is used as assessment of epidural anaesthesia efficacy in human medicine, but its usefulness in dogs is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of PI in determining epidural anaesthesia effectiveness. Material and Methods: This is prospective cross-over experimental study. Five healthy adult beagle dogs were anaesthetised and an epidural catheter was inserted in the lumbosacral area and adjusted so that the end of the catheter was placed at the fourth lumbar vertebra. Single-port catheters were used in the control group and multiple-port catheters were used in the treatment group. A PI probe was placed on a hind leg, and the catheter placement was confirmed via computed tomography. The treatment group received a bolus dose of lidocaine, and the control group received saline, via epidural catheter. The PI value was recorded every 5 min until 30 min after lidocaine injection. Results: The PIs of the hind limbs were not significantly different over time, nor were they between the control and lidocaine-injected groups at any point in time. Conclusion: The PI is not useful in determining the efficacy of epidural anaesthesia in dogs under general anaesthesia. In the future, finding a reliable method to evaluate the success of regional anaesthesia, even in patients under general anaesthesia, will be necessary.

Delayed Aspiration of Cerebrospinal Fluid From a Thoracic Epidural Catheter After Difficult Placement: A Case Report.

A 69-year-old female with Crohn's disease was admitted for open ileocecectomy with lysis of adhesions. The plan was to proceed with general endotracheal anesthesia and a thoracic epidural catheter for perioperative analgesia. Epidural access was attempted at the T10-11 and T11-12 interspaces, both of which resulted in accidental dural punctures. On the third attempt, the epidural catheter was inserted at the T9-10 interspace. Both the aspiration and test dose were negative. Thirty minutes later, after induction of general anesthesia, the catheter was again aspirated before the epidural pump was connected. Freely flowing, glucose-positive fluid was obtained, and the catheter was removed for the patient's safety. This case suggests that accidental dural puncture may be a risk factor for inappropriate communication with the subarachnoid space. This can be assumed to increase the risk of unanticipated high or total spinal block and its life-threatening sequelae.

Challenges with two epidural catheters for labor analgesia in a patient with lumbar adhesions: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of neuraxial analgesia varies with spinal canal pathology. Notably, a secondary epidural catheter has been shown to increase neuraxial labor analgesia in women with spinal lesions. Therefore, we present a case in which catheter withdrawal played a critical role in achieving effective labor analgesia in a woman with epidural adhesions after lumbar discectomy who had inadequate analgesia with two epidural catheters. CASE PRESENTATION: We encountered a patient with L5 lumbar epidural adhesions who reported pain even after receiving two epidural catheters. The catheters were placed in the L1/2 and L5/S intervertebral spaces. Analgesic effects were exerted when the L5/S catheter was withdrawn by 1 cm, suggesting that the catheter tip was initially placed inside the adhesion. CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration of catheter placement and adjustments by withdrawing the catheter are crucial in managing labor analgesia in patients with known epidural adhesions.

Epidural Hematoma in Minor Hepatic Metastasectomy.

Liver resection poses many challenges for the anesthesiologist, including intraoperative hemodynamic instability, postoperative pain, and risk of coagulopathy. We report a case of epidural hematoma after epidural catheter removal, following a minor liver single metastasectomy. The main purpose of this case report is to bring to light the false security provided by traditional coagulation parameters and whether further investigation should be considered in selected cases, before handling neuraxial catheters. Alterations in coagulation after a partial hepatectomy remain poorly understood; thus, we believe that additional hemostatic values such as viscoelastic testing might be considered to better assess these patients.

A Pediatric Epidural Catheter Fracture Suspected to Be Caused by a Glue.

A 65-day-old baby boy underwent the Kasai procedure under general and epidural anesthesia. The epidural catheter was inserted between the T11 and T12 vertebrae under general anesthesia, and secured with sterile tape, ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue, and film. Intra- and postoperative epidural analgesia was effective and there was no leakage around the insertion site. On the third day post-surgery, we tried to remove the catheter but discovered it was fractured 67mm from the tip. During the ultrasound examination, we observed a hyper-echoic structure located between the laminae of T11/T12. The pediatric orthopedic surgeon recommended removing the catheter to avoid long-term neurological sequelae of leaving the catheter, such as infection, fibrosis, migration, and irritation of neural tissues. It was surgically removed uneventfully on postoperative day 4. We requested the manufacturer to inspect the cross-section of the catheter under a microscope. The cross-section showed that 20% of the area had undergone tearing due to traction, while the remaining 80% was cracked. We also requested the manufacturer simulation after that. The same catheter, fixed on the polyolefin resin plate instead of skin with the same tape and glue, was easily fractured after three days. It is suspected that using ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue caused the catheter to fracture. When using glue containing ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate for pediatric epidural catheter fixation, special care is advised.

A Novel Makeshift Method to Collect Leaking Epidural Fluid: A Case Report.

A healthy 34-year-old full-term parturient was admitted to the labor suite where a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) was easily placed on the first attempt for labor analgesia. After an uneventful delivery, the epidural catheter was removed. Two days later, the patient experienced a fluid leak from the puncture site. The fluid was analyzed to determine whether it was an interstitial or a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We describe a novel technique to collect the leaking fluid without admixing fluid from the surrounding area. No previous reports describe a similar technique to diagnose the source of this questionable fluid leak.

Unique method for removal of knotted lumbar epidural catheter: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia is the preferred anesthesia method for cesarean delivery. The use of an epidural catheter is essential for administering additional drugs intraoperatively and managing postoperative pain. However, the insertion of epidural catheters is associated with various complications, such as total spinal anesthesia, symptoms indicative of spinal nerve root irritation, and challenges in epidural catheter removal. CASE SUMMARY: We present a case report of a challenging epidural catheter removal due to knotting. The lumbar computed tomography scan results revealed that the catheter formed a tight knot in the epidural space. We used a novel extubation method and successfully removed the catheter. CONCLUSION: The operator can use opposite forces to "spiral" apart the spinal joints by positioning the patient's body in a specific position. The findings indicate that, when combined with imaging examination results, this method is effective for the removal of epidural catheters.

Management of an Entrapped Epidural Catheter.

Epidural catheters are seldom challenging to remove from patients. The occurrence of knotting in an epidural catheter, resulting in entrapment, is an uncommon complication of epidural catheterization. There is the risk of significant morbidity with a retained catheter, with the potential for infection or nerve injury. This report describes the techniques used in a case where surgical removal of an entrapped epidural was required and discusses other potential strategies for the successful management of this type of complication. In this case, a low thoracic epidural catheter that was inserted into a 68-year-old male for post-operative analgesia proved challenging to remove. After multiple attempts to remove the catheter, a lumbar CT scan and neurosurgical evaluation were obtained. The neurosurgical team decided to perform a right thoracic hemilaminectomy to remove the entrapped catheter. This surgery revealed a knot near the distal tip of the catheter, which likely caused the entrapment of the catheter in the epidural space.

Presumed post-traumatic subdural hygroma in a 2.5-year-old spayed female Chihuahua.

A 2.5-year-old spayed female Chihuahua dog was presented with chronic cervical pain and exhibited a "prayer-like position" following a history of a 4-meter fall. CT and MRI revealed a moderate right-sided enlargement of the subdural space with cerebrospinal fluid, consistent with a subdural hygroma, appearing connected to a quadrigeminal cistern dilation. Percutaneous transfontanellar external drainage of the subdural fluid accumulation did not prevent its re-accumulation, and the dog was managed medically, leading to the complete resolution of clinical signs. The subdural hygroma was suspected to be secondary to the previous trauma.

Management of Post-Dural Puncture Headaches in Pediatric Patients with Epidural Blood or Saline Patch: An Educational Focused Review.

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common adverse outcome following puncture of the dura. It can occur after inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement or following diagnostic or therapeutic LP. The incidence of PDPH in pediatric patients has been estimated at 1-15% depending on patient factors (age, gender, body mass index) and needle factors (size and needle bevel/point type). The larger the needle gauge, the higher the incidence of PDPH. Various options have been proposed to treat PDPH including observation, bed rest, hydration, caffeine, and epidural blood/saline patch. The current manuscript provides a review of the use of epidural blood/saline patch in pediatric-aged patients with PDPH.

Broken Epidural Catheter After Vaginal Delivery.

The breakage of the epidural catheter is an alarming, rare, yet well-known complication. Despite the advances in modern imaging technologies, visualization of the broken catheter remains challenging, and surgical intervention might be necessary to remove the broken catheter. We report a case of a broken epidural catheter post-vaginal delivery, which was managed by surgical intervention.

Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management Following Thoracotomy for Aortic Coarctectomy.

Pain following thoracotomy is one of the most severe forms of postoperative pain. Post-thoracotomy pain may increase the risk of post-surgical pulmonary complications, postoperative mortality, prolong hospitalization, and increase utilization of healthcare resources. To mitigate these effects, anesthesia providers commonly employ continuous epidural infusions, paravertebral blocks, and systemic opioids for pain management and improvement of pulmonary mechanics. We report the use of a continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) via a peripheral nerve catheter for postoperative pain management of an 18-year-old patient who underwent complex aortic coarctation repair via lateral thoracotomy, aided by cardiopulmonary bypass. Continuous ESPB proved to be an acceptable alternative for postoperative pain control, producing a substantial multi-dermatomal sensory block, resulting in adequate pain control, reduced opioid consumption, and a potentially shorter hospital stay.

When The Unexpected Happens: The Intriguing Retrieval of a Broken Epidural Catheter.

Introduction: The accidental breakage of an epidural catheter during placement or removal poses a rare but challenging situation in clinical practice. This case report presents the successful removal of a broken epidural catheter and highlights the management strategies employed. Case Report: A 41-year-old male patient underwent a planned orthopedic implant removal surgery under epidural anesthesia. During catheter removal, a portion of the catheter fractured and remained lodged within the epidural space. The patient experienced persistent pain and concern regarding the retained fragment, necessitating immediate intervention. A multidisciplinary team comprising an orthopedic surgeon, neurosurgeon, anesthesiologist, and radiologists collaborated to develop a tailored retrieval strategy. Magnetic resonance imaging aided in localizing the fractured catheter fragment. Using a standard midline posterior approach, the catheter was safely removed without any complications. Post-retrieval monitoring revealed no adverse events, and the patient reported resolution of pain and improved satisfaction. Conclusion: Retrieving a broken epidural catheter requires a systematic and individualized approach. This case report contributes to the existing literature by providing insights into managing this rare complication, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary team, appropriate imaging, and meticulous retrieval techniques to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes.

Epidural Catheters for Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections to Target Higher Cervical Pathology: Clinical Images in Practice.

Cervical radicular pain is commonly treated with cervical epidural steroid injections. The transforaminal approach allows for direct treatment of the steroid at a particular nerve root or level. Still, it carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality with thromboembolism or injury to cervical vasculature. The interlaminar approach is commonly utilized as it avoids vascular structures. However, the epidural space becomes narrower at higher levels, limiting the ability to perform this approach at higher cervical levels. Cervical epidural catheters can be used and advanced to target higher cervical pathology through the interlaminar approach. We present clinical images demonstrating the utility of a cervical catheter for treating higher cervical levels.

Safety and Efficiency of Low-Dose Spinal Analgesia Compared to Epidural Analgesia in Treatment of Pain during Labour: A Case Control Study.

BACKGROUND: The epidural catheter for analgesia has been used for decades and has become the gold standard in pain therapy for pregnant women in labour. However, procedural parameters such as time to pain relief and duration to implementation pose hurdles for patients shortly before delivery. Low-dose spinal analgesia (LDSA) is an alternative procedure that was investigated in the study with regard to patient satisfaction and complication rates compared to epidural catheter. METHODS: In a retrospective monocentric study, a total of 242 patients receiving low-dose spinal analgesia or epidural catheters were evaluated using propensity score matching. Subjective patient satisfaction as well as complication rates were primarily analysed. We hypothesise that LDSA is a safe procedure and provides a similar level of satisfaction compared with the epidural catheter. For this purpose, both procedures were performed according to in-house standards and the patients were interviewed afterwards. Patients who required surgical delivery were excluded to prevent bias. RESULTS: The LDSA was rated on average as very good [1.09 ± 0.311 vs. 1.07 ± 0.431] in terms of satisfaction by the patients compared to the epidural catheter without showing a significant difference (p = 0.653). Complications were in the low single-digit non-significant range for both procedures [6 (5%) vs. 7 (6%); p = 0.776]. The evaluation showed more perineal tears I° and II° in the low-dose spinal analgesia group [I°: 28 (23%) vs. 3 (2%); p < 0.001-II°: 30 (25%) vs. 2 (2%); p < 0.001]. Neonatal parameters differed significantly only in umbilical cord base excess and umbilical cord venous pH [-5.40 vs. -6.40; p = 0.005]. CONCLUSIONS: LDSA represents a low complication procedure for patients at the end of labour with a high satisfaction level. With the LDSA in the repertoire of pain relief during childbirth, it is possible to also achieve pain reduction for women with deliveries of high velocity without compromising patient satisfaction or perinatal morbidity.

Severity of spinal degeneration does not affect the pain reduction under continuous epidural analgesia.

PURPOSE: To outline clinical effectiveness of continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) or lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) depending on severity of spinal degeneration. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients with FBSS or LSS who underwent CEA within an inpatient rehabilitation program were evaluated. The pain reduction was measured by VAS on an hourly basis. Substantial pain reduction was defined as a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) > 50%. Severity of spinal degeneration, side effects and patient-specific characteristics were documented. RESULT: We included a total of 148 patients with 105 patients suffering from FBSS and 48 with LSS. The average pain reduction was - 37.6 ± 19.2 in FBSS and - 38.1 ± 17.8 in LSS group (p < .001 and p < .001, respectively). In the FBSS group, sensory deficits (p = .047) and numbness (p = .002), and in the LSS group, a severe disability measured by ODI (38.2 ± 15.4 vs. 57.3 ± 11.3, p < .001) significantly contributed to a worse outcome. The severity of the spinal degeneration and psychological disorders did not affect the pain reduction in terms of MCID. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence about CEA in the treatment of FBSS and LSS. CEA provides a significant pain reduction even under intensified physiotherapeutic exercising in patients with severe spinal degeneration and a broad variety of secondary diagnoses. Neurologic deficits in case of FBSS and severe disability in case of LSS may be risk factors for less favorable outcome.

Inadequate Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis Is Associated With Higher Venous Thromboembolism Rates Among Trauma Patients With Epidurals.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines encourage higher doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylaxis in trauma patients. The risks of LMWH must be considered for patients who require an epidural catheter. We compared adequate and inadequate prophylaxis to determine if venous thromboembolism (VTE) and complication rates differed among patients with epidural catheters. METHODS: Trauma patients who required an epidural catheter between 2012 and 2019 were reviewed for VTE and epidural-related complications. Adequate dosing was defined as enoxaparin 30 mg or 40 mg twice daily. Inadequate dosing was defined as unfractionated heparin subcutaneously or enoxaparin once daily. RESULTS: Over the 8-y study period, 113 trauma patients required an epidural catheter of which 64.6% were males with a mean age of 55.8 y and injury severity score of 14. Epidural catheters were associated with 11 (9.7%) patients developing an acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 2 (1.8%) patients with an acute pulmonary embolism. Those patients who received adequate doses of enoxaparin were less likely to have any VTE or DVT. Complications associated with epidural catheters were not dependent on the type of pharmacological prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high VTE rate observed in trauma patients who required an epidural catheter, along with the low complication rate that was observed independent of the type of pharmacological prophylaxis given, the data indicate that current efforts for higher doses of LMWH appear to be safe and associated with a lower VTE rate.

Catéter epidural roto, una complicación poco frecuente / Broken epidural catheter, a rare complication

Resumen: Actualmente, la anestesia neuroaxial es preferida por sus múltiples ventajas con respecto al manejo del dolor. El procedimiento involucra la colocación de un catéter epidural en el espacio peridural, una complicación muy rara es la ruptura de éste. Se estima una incidencia de 0.002 a 0.004%. El presente trabajo reporta el caso de un paciente masculino de 77 años sometido a una resección transuretral de próstata, que presenta ruptura del catéter durante el retiro. La tomografía reportó la presencia del catéter a nivel subaracnoideo, sin presencia de síntomas en el paciente. Se egresó y a los seis meses de seguimiento no presentaba síntomas. Es de importancia comprender que siempre se debe notificar al paciente en caso de que esto suceda y después realizar estudios de imagen para su localización. Posteriormente se debe valorar la presencia de síntomas y, si existen, considerar una laminectomía para su retiro.

Abstract: Nowadays, neuraxial anesthesia is preferred due to its multiple advantages related to pain management. This procedure involves placing an epidural catheter within the epidural space, with rupture of the catheter being an uncommon complication. Its incidence is around 0.002 to 0.004%. The present work reports the case of a 77-year-old male who underwent a transurethral prostate resection, where the catheter broke while being removed. CT scan reported the presence of the catheter within subarachnoid space, without the patient presenting symptoms. It is important to understand that notifying the patient is a priority in case this complication happens, and then order imaging studies to locate the catheter. Finally, if symptoms are present, a laminectomy should be assessed to remove the remaining piece.