Case report: Dysphagia aortica.

Dysphagia, characterized by abnormal swallowing, presents as oropharyngeal or esophageal dysphagia. Dysphagia aortica, a rare manifestation, results from external aortic compression, leading to swallowing difficulties. Limited literature exists on this condition. We report a 22-year-old male with a complex surgical history, including aortic repairs, who presented with dysphagia and chest pain. Extensive evaluations ruled out other causes. Imaging revealed esophageal compression by an aortic graft. Endoscopy confirmed extrinsic compression. A barium swallow study was unremarkable. A diagnosis of dysphagia aortica was made, and conservative treatment was initiated. Dysphagia aortica remains a rare but noteworthy cause of dysphagia with this case highlighting the importance of considering vascular compression in patients with previous history of aortic surgery. Increased clinical awareness is essential for timely diagnosis and tailored treatment strategies. Further research is needed to establish guidelines for managing this condition, given its diverse causes.

Phrenic Ampulla Emptying Dysfunction in Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Background/Aims: Pharyngeal pump, esophageal peristalsis, and phrenic ampulla emptying play important roles in the propulsion of bolus from the mouth to the stomach. There is limited information available on the mechanism of normal and abnormal phrenic ampulla emptying. The goal of our study is to describe the relationship between bolus flow and esophageal pressure profiles during the phrenic ampulla emptying in normal subjects and patient with phrenic ampulla dysfunction. Methods: Pressure (using topography) and bolus flow (using changes in impedance) relationship through the esophagus and phrenic ampulla were determined in 15 normal subjects and 15 patients with retrograde escape of bolus from the phrenic ampulla into esophagus during primary peristalsis. Results: During the phrenic ampulla phase, 2 high pressure peaks (proximal, related to lower esophageal sphincter and distal, related to crural diaphragm) were observed in normal subjects and patients during the phrenic ampulla emptying phase. The proximal was always higher than the distal one in normal subjects; in contrast, reverse was the case in patients with the retrograde escape of bolus from the phrenic ampulla into the esophagus. Conclusions: We propose that a strong after-contraction of the lower esophageal sphincter plays an important role in the normal phrenic ampullary emptying. A defective lower esophageal after-contraction, along with high crural diaphragm pressure are responsible for the phrenic ampulla emptying dysfunction.

Pediatric Esophageal Dysphagia.

Swallowing is an elaborate process that requires neuromuscular coordination. Pediatric esophageal dysphagia is broadly categorized into structural and nonstructural causes. The structural causes of pediatric esophageal dysphagia are related to processes that narrow the lumen of the esophagus. Esophageal strictures are the result of scar tissue formation within the lumen of the esophagus, leading to stenosis. Vascular rings and slings cause external compression of the esophagus. Diagnosis requires an esophagram and computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment is guided by the patient's symptoms and underlying diagnosis, although it often requires surgical intervention when symptomatic.

Esophageal Dysphagia in Adults: When It Sticks.

Esophageal dysphagia is a common yet difficult to diagnose condition. This article underscores the role of detailed patient history and physical examinations, including prompt endoscopic evaluation, for accurate differentiation between esophageal and oropharyngeal dysphagia. The authors discuss the heightened importance of early intervention in certain patient groups, such as elderly individuals and patients with head and neck cancer, to mitigate the risk of malnutrition and infection. The authors delve into etiologic factors highlighting the complexity of clinical presentations and the significance of tailored management strategies.

Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Heller's myotomy versus pneumatic dilatation for achalasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Achalasia has several treatment modalities. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with those of pneumatic dilatation (PD) in adult patients suffering from achalasia. METHODS: We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Embase for related clinical trials about patients suffering from achalasia. The quality appraisal and assessment of risk of bias were conducted with GRADE and Cochrane's risk of bias tool, respectively. Homogeneous and heterogeneous data was analyzed under fixed and random-effects models, respectively. RESULTS: The pooled analysis of 10 studies showed that PD was associated with a higher rate of remission at three months, one year, three years and five years (RR = 1.25 [1.09, 1.42] (p = 0.001); RR = 1.13 [1.05, 1.20] (p = 0.0004); RR = 1.48 [1.19, 1.82] (p = 0.0003); RR = 1.49 [1.18, 1.89] (p = 0.001)), respectively. LHM was associated with lower number of cases suffering from adverse events, dysphagia and relapses (RR = 0.50 [0.25, 0.98] (p = 0.04); RR = 0.33 [0.16, 0.71] (p = 0.004); RR = 0.38 [0.15, 0.97] (p = 0.04)), respectively. There is no significant difference between both groups regarding the lower esophageal pressure, perforations, remission rate at two years, Eckardt score after one year and reflux. CONCLUSION: PD had higher remission rates than LHM at three months, one year and three years, but not at two years or five years. More research is needed to determine whether PD has a significant advantage over LHM in terms of long-term remission rates.

Dysphagia in patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery: Assessment using a functional scale. / Disfagia en pacientes intervenidos de atresia de esófago: valoración con una escala funcional.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is defined as difficulty swallowing. Up to 84% of patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery have dysphagia beyond the neonatal period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery from 2005 to 2021 was carried out. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) was used to assess dysphagia in 4 age groups (< 1 year old, 1-4 years old, 5-11 years old, and > 11 years old). FOIS scores < 7 or symptoms of choking, impaction, or food aversion were regarded as dysphagia. RESULTS: 63 patients were analyzed. 74% (47/63) had dysphagia during follow-up. Prevalence was 50% in patients < 1 year old (FOIS mean 4.32), 77% in patients aged 1-4 (FOIS mean 5.61), 45% in patients aged 5-11 (FOIS mean 5.87), and 38% in patients > 11 years old (FOIS mean 6.8). The most frequent causes of dysphagia were stenosis, which occurred in 38% of the patients (n=24), and gastroesophageal reflux (n=18), which was present in 28% of the patients. Both conditions were associated with significantly lower mean FOIS scores (p< 0.05) in the patients under 11 years of age. Differences (p< 0.05) were found in the dysphagia-associated perinatal factors in the various age groups, with longer ventilation assistance times, parenteral nutrition, and hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia is an extremely frequent symptom at any given age in patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery. A standardized, cross-disciplinary follow-up is key to improve quality of life.

INTRODUCCION: La disfagia se define como dificultad en el proceso de alimentación. Hasta un 84% de pacientes intervenidos de atresia de esófago tienen disfagia más allá del periodo neonatal. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de serie de casos intervenidos por atresia de esófago 2005-2021. Se utilizó la escala FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) para cuantificar la disfagia en 4 grupos de edad (menores de 1 año, 1-4 años, 5-11 años y mayores de 11 años). Se consideró disfagia cualquier valor de FOIS < 7 o síntomas de atragantamiento, impactación o aversión alimentaria. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron datos de 63 pacientes. El 74% (47/63) presentó disfagia durante el seguimiento. La prevalencia fue del 50% < 1 año (media FOIS 4.32), 77% 1-4 años (media FOIS 5.61), 45% 5-11 años (media FOIS 5.87) y 38% > 11 años (media FOIS 6.8). Las causas más frecuentes de disfagia fueron la estenosis, que presentó un 38% de los pacientes (n= 24) y el reflujo gastroesofágico (n= 18), que presentó a su vez un 28% de los pacientes. Ambas condiciones se asociaron con unos valores medios de FOIS significativamente menores (p< 0,05) en los pacientes menores de 11 años. Se encontraron diferencias (p< 0,05) en factores perinatales asociados a disfagia en los distintos periodos de edad, a destacar mayor tiempo medio de: asistencia ventilatoria, nutrición parenteral e ingreso hospitalario. CONCLUSIONES: La disfagia es un síntoma extremadamente frecuente a cualquier edad en los pacientes intervenidos de atresia de esófago. Un seguimiento estandarizado y multidisciplinar es esencial para mejorar la calidad de vida de estos pacientes.

Multiple Sclerosis Is Associated With Achalasia and Diffuse Esophageal Spasm.

Background/Aims: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease characterized by the demyelination of primarily the central nervous system. Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) and achalasia are both disorders of esophageal peristalsis which cause clinical symptoms of dysphagia. Mechanisms involving dysfunction of the pre- and post-ganglionic nerve fibers of the myenteric plexus have been proposed. We sought to determine whether MS confers an increased risk of developing achalasia or DES. Methods: Cohort analysis was done using the Explorys database. Univariate logistic regression was performed to determine the odds MS confers to each motility disorder studied. Comparison of proportions of dysautonomia comorbidities was performed among the cohorts. Patients with a prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, chronic Chagas' disease, opioid use, or CREST syndrome were excluded from the study. Results: Odds of MS patients developing achalasia or DES were (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.73-2.52; P < 0.001) and (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.89-3.42; P < 0.001), respectively. In the MS/achalasia cohort, 27.27%, 18.18%, 9.09%, and 45.45% patients had urinary incontinence, gastroparesis, impotence, and insomnia, respectively. In the MS/DES cohort, 35.19%, 11.11%, 3.70%, and 55.56% had these symptoms. In MS patients without motility disorders, 12.64%, 0.79%, 2.21%, and 21.85% had these symptoms. Conclusions: Patients with MS have higher odds of developing achalasia or DES compared to patients without MS. MS patients with achalasia or DES have higher rates of dysautonomia comorbidities. This suggests that these patients have a more severe disease phenotype in regards to the extent of neuronal degradation and demyelination causing the autonomic dysfunction.

Dysphagia.

Dysphagia is an important clinical symptom that increases in prevalence with age. Both oropharyngeal and esophageal processes can contribute to dysphagia, and these can be differentiated with a careful history. Neuromuscular processes are more prevalent than structural causes in oropharyngeal dysphagia, therefore, investigation should start with a modified barium swallow. In contrast, structural processes dominate in esophageal dysphagia, and endoscopy can offer biopsy and therapy by way of dilation. Manometry is performed for esophageal dysphagia when no structural etiology is found. Specific management of dysphagia is dependent on the etiology and mechanism of dysphagia.

Development and modification of a dysphagia question prompt list to improve patient-physician communication: Incorporating both esophageal expert and patient perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions, intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, a dysphagia-specific QPL has not been developed for patients with esophageal dysphagia symptoms. We aim to develop a dysphagia-specific QPL incorporating both esophageal expert and patient perspectives, applying rigorous methodology. METHODS: The QPL content was generated applying a two-round modified Delphi (RAND/UCLA) method among 11 experts. In round one, experts provided five answers to the prompts: "What general questions should patients ask when being seen for dysphagia?" and "What questions do I not hear patients asking but, given my experience, I believe they should be asking?" In round two, experts rated proposed questions on a 5-point Likert scale. Responses rated as "essential" or "important", determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥4.0, were accepted for inclusion. Subsequently, 20 patients from Stanford Health Care were enrolled to modify the preliminary QPL, to incorporate their perspectives and opinions. Patients independently rated questions applying the same 5-point Likert scale. At the end, patients were encouraged to propose additional questions to incorporate into the QPL by open-endedly asking "Are there questions we didn't ask, that you think we should?" KEY RESULTS: Eleven experts participated in both voting rounds. Of 85 questions generated from round one, 60 (70.6%) were accepted for inclusion, meeting a median value of ≥4.0. Questions were combined to reduce redundancy, narrowing down to 44 questions. Questions were categorized into the following six themes: 1. "What is causing my dysphagia?"; 2. "Associated symptoms"; 3. "Testing for dysphagia"; 4. "Lifestyle modifications"; 5. "Treatment for dysphagia"; and 6. "Prognosis". The largest number of questions covered "What is causing my dysphagia" (27.3%). Twenty patients participated and modified the QPL. Of the 44 questions experts agreed were important, only 30 questions (68.2%) were accepted for inclusion. Six patients proposed 10 additional questions and after incorporating the suggested questions, the final dysphagia-specific QPL created by esophageal experts and modified by patients consisted of 40 questions. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Incorporating expert and patient perspectives, we developed a dysphagia-specific QPL to enhance patient-physician communication. Our study highlights importance of incorporating patient perspective when developing such a communication tool. Further studies will measure the impact of this communication tool on patient engagement.

Treatment of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction with concomitant hypercontractile esophagus: A case series.

Hypercontractile esophagus with concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a rare entity that is characterized by both esophageal hypercontractility and lack of relaxation of the EGJ. The clinical characteristics of these patients are not well-described and there is no strict recommendation regarding the treatment of this condition. We report four cases of patients with hypercontractile esophagus and concomitant to EGJOO. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and barium swallow and met the criteria of Chicago Classification for both EGJOO and hypercontractile esophagus. Patients were followed up to four years from diagnosis and clinical symptoms were recorded. Four patients, who underwent evaluation for dysphagia, were found to have both EGJOO and hypercontractile esophagus on HRM. Two of them had mild symptoms and did not undergo treatment with no progression of symptoms on follow-up. Of the two patients who underwent treatment, one had botulinum toxin injection to the EGJ via upper GI endoscopy and one underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Symptoms in both patients improved. Patients with concomitant hypercontractile esophagus and EGJOO present with varying degrees of symptoms and the treatment approach should be personalized according to the degree of symptoms and general clinical condition.

An Uncommon Case of Weight Loss in a Nonagenarian.

Weight loss in older adults can be due to multiple causes. A systematic approach is required to pinpoint the etiology. Dysphagia is an important symptom associated with weight loss. In the absence of anatomical abnormalities, functional swallowing disorders such as achalasia can be mistaken for an aging esophagus or oropharynx. The incidence of achalasia in older adults is rare, with most cases presenting between 30 to 60 years of age. Here, we present an uncommon case of achalasia in a 93-year-old Chinese woman. A barium swallow and high-resolution manometry confirmed the diagnosis of achalasia. Botulinum toxin injection was administered. She did well, achieving weight gain and resolution of her symptoms. In conclusion, early recognition and appropriate management of uncommon causes of weight loss can greatly improve the quality of life of older adults.

Esophageal Dysphagia in Children: State of the Art and Proposal for a Symptom-Based Diagnostic Approach.

Pediatric esophageal dysphagia (PED) is an infrequent condition that can be determined by a large number of disorders. The etiologic diagnosis is challenging due to overlapping clinical phenotypes and to the absence of pediatric diagnostic guidelines. This review aims to summarize the most relevant causes of ED during childhood, highlight the clinical scenarios of PED presentation and discuss the indications of available diagnostic tools. Available information supports that PED should always be investigated as it can underlie life-threatening conditions (e.g., foreign body ingestion, mediastinal tumors), represent the complication of benign disorders (e.g., peptic stenosis) or constitute the manifestation of organic diseases (e.g., eosinophilic esophagitis, achalasia). Therefore, the diagnosis of functional PED should be made only after excluding mucosal, structural, or motility esophageal abnormalities. Several clinical features may contribute to the diagnosis of PED. Among the latter, we identified several clinical key elements, relevant complementary-symptoms and predisposing factors, and organized them in a multi-level, hierarchical, circle diagram able to guide the clinician through the diagnostic work-up of PED. The most appropriate investigational method(s) should be chosen based on the diagnostic hypothesis: esophagogastroduodenoscopy has highest diagnostic yield for mucosal disorders, barium swallow has greater sensitivity in detecting achalasia and structural abnormalities, chest CT/MR inform on the mediastinum, manometry is most sensitive in detecting motility disorders, while pH-MII measures gastroesophageal reflux. Further studies are needed to define the epidemiology of PED, determine the prevalence of individual underlying etiologies, and assess the diagnostic value of investigational methods as to develop a reliable diagnostic algorithm.

Clinical presentation vs endoscopy for an early diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis: a case report.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a type-2 mediated, chronic inflammatory disease showing an increase of both incidence and prevalence. Early diagnosis is mandatory, to prevent fibrostenotic complication of the disease. Due to the low sensitivity of the classic endoscopic features of the disease, a strong clinical suspicion should drive the decision to collect mucosal biopsies of the esophagus. We describe the case of an atopic patient suffering from dysphagia with normal esophageal mucosa and frank histological hallmarks of the disease.

Lumen reconstruction with magnetic compression anastomosis technique in a patient with complete esophageal stricture.

Background: Complete esophageal obstruction (CEO) is a rare condition of which treatment options are challenging. Surgery is the main treatment with high morbidity and mortality rates. Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) is a novel technique developed to restore lumen patency in gastrointestinal and biliary tracts. However, MCA experience is limited in respect of esophageal strictures. Case Report: We present a 26-year-old patient having CEO. Magnets are inserted endoscopically to both sides of the obstructed area via oral and retrograde (through the gastrostomy tract) route. On day 8, magnets stuck together and were removed endoscopically through the oral route. Subsequently, sessions of balloon dilatations and triamcinolone injection were performed. The patient's complaint of aphagia resolved after the treatment process. Conclusion: In conclusion, MCA is an alternative technique that can be used to restore lumen patency in esophageal strictures and also avoids complications of surgical interventions.

Best Practice Recommendations for Geriatric Dysphagia Management with 5 Ws and 1H.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is a geriatric syndrome. Changes in the whole body that occur with aging also affect swallowing functions and cause presbyphagia. This condition may progress to oropharyngeal and/or esophageal dysphagia in the presence of secondary causes that increase in incidence with aging. However, no study has been published that provides recommendations for use in clinical practice that addresses in detail all aspects of the management of dysphagia in geriatric individuals. This study aimed to answer almost all potential questions and problems in the management of geriatric dysphagia in clinical practice. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team created this recommendation guide using the seven-step and three-round modified Delphi method via e-mail. The study included 39 experts from 29 centers in 14 cities. RESULTS: Based on the 5W and 1H method, we developed 216 detailed recommendations for older adults from the perspective of different disciplines dealing with older people. CONCLUSION: This consensus-based recommendation is a useful guide to address practical clinical questions in the diagnosis, rehabilitation, and follow-up for the management of geriatric dysphagia and also contains detailed commentary on these issues.

Empirical Dilation of Non-obstructive Dysphagia: Current Understanding and Future Directions.

Non-obstructive dysphagia (NOD) is defined as symptomatic dysphagia in patients with negative endoscopic and radiographic workup. The management of NOD remains controversial as there is a discrepancy between different guidelines and clinical practice. Despite the lack of high-quality studies, empiric dilation for NOD is a common clinical practice among endoscopists and the approach varies between different clinical centers. In this review, we summarize the published literature on empiric dilation for NOD and propose a management algorithm for offering empiric dilation to patients presenting with dysphagia.

Upper Esophageal Dysphagia.

Esophageal dysphagia presents acutely, most frequently as a food impaction, or in a progressive fashion. Anatomic changes are frequently responsible. Although the history may be suggestive, diagnosis is made from imaging or endoscopic studies. In asymptomatic cases, observation is most appropriate. Treatment is frequently accomplished endoscopically. Strictures, cricopharyngeal hyperfunction, and Zenker diverticulum are potential etiologic causes. For the purpose of this article focused on upper esophageal dysphagia, delineation between the upper and lower parts is the crossing of the aortic arch but also includes the most distal aspects of the hypopharynx including the inferior pharyngeal constrictors and upper esophageal sphincter.

Postoperative Dysphagia Aortica: Comparison with Other Dysphagia.

Dysphagia can be classified as oropharyngeal or esophageal, and functional or structural deficits of the esophagus can cause esophageal dysphagia. Dysphagia aortica (DA) is defined as dysphagia caused by extrinsic compression of the esophagus by the aorta. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of DA by comparing the findings of videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) with those of other dysphagia. Sixty-seven patients with postoperative dysphagia aortica (PDA), dysphagia after brainstem infarction (DBI), dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (DACDF), and subjective swallowing difficulty (SSD) without penetration and/or aspiration, who had undergone VFSS incorporating tests using 5 ml of thin and thick liquids, were included. The clinical data were collected retrospectively. The penetration-aspiration scale, functional dysphagia scale (FDS), esophageal transit time (ETT), and aortic lesion parameters (maximal diameter and distance between the lesion and the apex of the aortic arch) were assessed. The patients with PDA had higher FDS scores than the patients with SSD and lower scores than the patients with DBI did on thin liquids, while the FDS scores on thick liquids were lower in the patients with PDA than in those with DBI or DACDF. The patients with PDA had longer ETT than the other three groups. No correlation was found between the aortic lesion parameters and the VFSS findings. Although PDA has some oropharyngeal symptoms, the esophageal phase was affected mainly by PDA. After an operation on the aorta, VFSS should be considered before resuming oral feeding.

Esophageal dysphagia in neuromuscular disorder patients with validity and reliability study of the brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire.

Esophageal dysphagia (ED) is often underestimated in neuromuscular disorders (NMD) and it is important to evaluate the esophageal phase of swallowing with an easy and rapid screening test. We aimed both to assess the prevalence of ED in NMD and to perform validity and reliability study of the brief easophageal dysphagia questionnaire (BEDQ) screening test in NMD patients. This prospective cross-sectional clinical study was performed on NMD patients. Demographic features and disease characteristics were recorded. Endoscopic evaluation for oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) and high-resolution esophageal manometry for ED were performed. In addition, the BEDQ and the 10-item eating assessment tool (EAT-10) were used to all subjects. Cronbach's α and principle components factor analysis (PFCA) with varimax rotation were used for reliability. The Chicago Classification version 3 (CCv3) level (high-resolution esophageal manometry) and EAT-10 was used for validity. A total of 50 patients were included in the study. Thirty-four (68%) patients were diagnosed with myasthenia gravis and 16 (32%) patients were diagnosed with myopathy. Esophageal dysphagia according to the CCv3 was found in 33 (66%) of patients. While the Cronbach's α was excellent as 0.937 for test overall the T-BEDQ scale. The PCFA included all scale items and resulted in a single factor (eigenvalue = 5.72, 71.5%). The all BEDQ scores were demonstrated good correlation with EAT-10 score and very good correlation with CCv3 level. Evaluation of swallowing in patients with NMD should include not only the oropharyngeal phase of swallowing, but also esophageal phase. For this purpose, the BEDQ can be used as a rapid, valid, and reliable test for the evaluation of ED.

The Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire shows better discriminative capacity for clinical and manometric findings than the Eckardt score: Results from a multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Grading dysphagia is crucial for clinical management of patients. The Eckardt score (ES) is the most commonly used for this purpose. We aimed to compare the ES with the recently developed Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) in terms of their correlation and discriminative capacity for clinical and manometric findings and evaluate the effect of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms on both. METHODS: Symptomatic patients referred for high-resolution manometry (HRM) were prospectively recruited from seven centers in Spain and Latin America. Clinical data and several scores (ES, BEDQ, GERDQ) were collected and contrasted to HRM findings. Standard statistical analysis was performed. KEY RESULTS: 426 patients were recruited, 31.2% and 41.5% being referred exclusively for dysphagia and GERD symptoms, respectively. Both BEDQ and ES were independently associated with achalasia. Only BEDQ was independently associated with being referred for dysphagia and with relevant HRM findings. ROC curve analysis for achalasia diagnosis showed AUC of 0.809 for BEDQ and 0.765 for ES, with the main difference being higher BEDQ sensitivity (80.0% vs 70.8% for ES). GERDQ independently predicted ES but not BEDQ. In the absence of dysphagia (BEDQ = 0), GERD symptoms significantly determine ES. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Our study suggests both the BEDQ and ES can complementarily describe symptomatic burden in achalasia. BEDQ has several advantages over the ES in the dysphagia evaluation, basically due to its higher sensitivity for manometric diagnosis and independence of GERD symptoms. ES should be used as an achalasia-specific metric, while BEDQ is a better symptom-generic evaluating tool.