Correlation between severity of preoperative low back pain and postoperative outcomes in lumbar disc herniation surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Low back pain (LBP) frequently occurs in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH), however the extent to which discectomy ameliorates it and how preoperative LBP influences postoperative outcomes remains unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate the improvement in LBP and its impact on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing discectomy for LDH at eight hospitals from April 2017 to March 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected on patients' backgrounds, operative factors, and PROMs, including the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain in the low back, buttock, or leg, EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and postoperative satisfaction. METHODS: Patients were categorized into mild (NRS 0-3), moderate (NRS 4-7), or severe (NRS 8-10) LBP groups. Inverse probability weighting with propensity scores was used to adjust for demographic and clinical differences between groups. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were conducted to compare background data and clinical characteristics. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for less than 50% improvement in LBP. RESULTS: This study included 928 patients: 270 mild, 343 moderate, and 315 severe. After adjustment, preoperative NRS scores were significantly different across groups, with scores of 1.6 (SD 1.3), 5.6 (SD 1.0), and 8.8 (SD 0.9), respectively. Postoperative NRS scores also varied significantly, with worse outcomes observed in the severe group compared to the mild group, yet similar to the moderate group. A total of 46.8% of the mild group, 86.6% of the moderate group, and 72.9% of the severe group achieved a 50% decrease in NRS scores of LBP. Preoperative EQ-5D and ODI scores were significantly worse in the severe group compared to the mild or moderate groups, but postoperative scores were not significantly different between the severe and moderate groups. No significant differences in postoperative satisfaction were observed among the groups. Being female was a significant risk factor for less than 50% improvement in LBP (odds ratio = 1.56, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Discectomy significantly improved LBP in patients with LDH, including those with moderate or severe LBP. Patients with severe LBP showed similar improvements in PROMs as those with moderate LBP. Female gender emerged as a significant risk factor for less than optimal improvement in LBP.

Effects of beta-blockers on quality of life and well-being in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular function-a prespecified substudy from REDUCE-AMI.

AIMS: In the Randomized Evaluation of Decreased Usage of Beta-Blockers after Acute Myocardial Infarction (REDUCE-AMI) study, long-term beta-blocker use in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction demonstrated no effect on death or cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of this prespecified substudy was to investigate effects of beta-blockers on self-reported quality of life and well-being. METHODS AND RESULTS: From this parallel-group, open-label, registry-based randomized clinical trial, EQ-5D, and World Health Organization well-being index-5 (WHO-5) questionnaires were obtained at 6-10 weeks and 11-13 months after AMI in 4080 and 806 patients, respectively. We report results from intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses for the overall population and relevant subgroups using Wilcoxon rank sum test and adjusted ordinal regression analyses. Of the 4080 individuals reporting EQ-5D (median age 64 years, 22% female), 2023 were randomized to beta-blockers. The main outcome, median EQ-5D index score, was 0.94 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.88, 0.97] in the beta-blocker group, and 0.94 (IQR 0.88, 0.97) in the no-beta-blocker group 6-10 weeks after AMI, OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.89-1.13; P > 0.9]. After 11-13 months, results remained unchanged. Findings were robust in on-treatment analyses and across relevant subgroups. Secondary outcomes, EQ-VAS and WHO-5 index score, confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: Among patients after AMI with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, self-reported quality of life and well-being was not significantly different in individuals randomized to routine long-term beta-blocker therapy as compared to individuals with no beta-blocker use. These results appear consistent regardless of adherence to randomized treatment and across subgroups which emphasizes the need for a careful individual risk-benefit evaluation prior to initiation of beta-blocker treatment.

Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Determinants in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex metabolic disorder associated with several complications that determine the quality of life of the patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a measurable outcome of the self-perception of a patient's health which is affected due to age, lifestyle changes, medication, and treatment modalities. This study was undertaken to understand the impact of individual parameters of age, medication type and duration, diabetes-associated complications, and levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) on the quality of life (QoL) of the patient.  Methodology This single-center prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), Patna, Bihar, India. Participants were recruited from the Outpatient Department of General Medicine, IGIMS. HRQoL was measured using a validated and reliable EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire developed by the EuroQol Research Foundation, along with the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). The eligibility criteria included adult diabetic patients above 18 years of age with complete medical records, who had been treated at the outpatient department for a minimum of three months and could be interviewed. Results The results from this study show that 46% of the patients belonged to the age group of 45-65 years. The quality of health index scores and EQ-VAS scores significantly correlated with age (p-values: 1.11 e-4 and 3.09 e-5; <0.05). Of the subjects, 66.4%, 6.7%, and 26.8% were under oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA), insulin, and both insulin with OHA medications respectively. HbA1C levels were statistically significantly correlated with mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression (p-value 0.032; <0.05), along with self-perception of the patient's health (p-value 0.00026; <0.05). Also, the perception of having slight problems in mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression was similar irrespective of gender (EQ-5D-5L score for males: 9.47 and females: 9.3). Despite suffering from diabetes-associated chronic complications, 60.5% of the subjects perceived their overall health to be good as indicated by the scores. Conclusion The self-perception of HRQoL concerning mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression was correlated with age, duration of anti-diabetic medication, and HbA1C level. Good mobility, self-care, and performing usual activities reduce anxiety or depression as opposed to age, pain, and discomfort. However, the subjects in this study cohort perceived overall good health in themselves in terms of EQ-VAS and 5D-5L scores, indicating effective diabetic care and management options available to them.

Factors Influencing Treatment Preference in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: A Study Using Conjoint Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the wide range of treatment options available for diabetic macular edema (DME), adherence to treatment remains a barrier. Therefore, this study used conjoint analysis to examine the factors that patients with DME prioritize when choosing a course of treatment and investigated differences in quality of life and levels of disease self-management in patients with or without experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through an online survey in Japan between May 31, 2022, and June 30, 2022. Questionnaires were sent to 27,236 individuals registered in the diabetes panels, with experience of treatment for DME within the last 10 years. Conjoint analysis was employed to calculate the relative importance, i.e., degree of influence on patients' treatment choices, considering the trade-offs among five factors: cost per treatment, frequency of visits, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity, physician's explanation about disease and treatment, and frequency of treatment-related side effects. RESULTS: A total of 237 responses were used to assess the relative importance of cost per treatment, frequency of visits, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity, physician's explanation about the disease, treatment, and frequency of treatment-related side effects using conjoint analysis. The importance of each factor was anticipated post-treatment visual acuity at 30.0, frequency of treatment-related side effects at 25.5, treatment frequency at 17.7, cost per treatment at 16.5, and physician explanation about the disease and treatment at 10.4. The average EuroQoL 5 dimension 5 level index value in patients with and without anti-VEGF treatment experience was 0.785 and 0.825, respectively, with no major difference. CONCLUSIONS: Anticipated post-treatment visual acuity was identified as the most important factor in selecting a treatment regardless of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment experience demonstrating when patients with DME make treatment choices, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity is prioritized over treatment frequency and cost.

Quantitative Assessment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Using the Disc Signal Intensity Index in Patients With Spine-Related Pain.

Objective This is a retrospective observational study that aims to investigate the association between disc signal intensity index (DSI2) scores and patient-reported outcome measures in patients with lumbar spine disorders. Methods We introduced DSI2 to quantitatively assess disc degeneration. MRI records of patients with lumbar spine-related pain between 2019 and 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient demographics and outcomes were collected, including the Numerical Rating Scale of Pain and EuroQol Group 5 Dimension 5-Level Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) scores. The DSI2 was calculated by dividing the mean signal intensity of the L1-S1 discs by that of the CSF on midsagittal T2-weighted MRI images. Results Each DSI2 level corresponded to a Pfirrmann grade score at the respective lumbar level. Multivariable linear regression analysis using the EQ-5D-5L as the objective variable identified BMI (p = 0.007) and average DSI2 (p = 0.018) as independent risk factors for EQ-5D-5L deterioration. However, the mean Pfirrmann grade score was not an independent risk factor (p = 0.58). Conclusion Our study using DSI2 showed the relationship between disc degeneration and EQ-5D-5L deterioration. Distinct from the Pfirrmann grading system, the DSI2 method is a promising alternative for future disc research that excellently detects the subtle progression of degeneration.

An Exploratory Study of Alternative Time Frames and Descriptors for EQ-5D-5L in Obstructive Airway Diseases Using Mixed Methods.

OBJECTIVES: EQ-5D-5L with its recall time of "today" may limit its ability to capture episodic symptoms and exacerbations in chronic obstructive airway diseases (OAD). We examined whether longer time frames and changing the intensity response scales to frequency scales could improve the measurement properties of EQ-5D-5L. METHODS: We used a mixed-method design starting with in-depth interviews with 20 patients and clinicians to elicit preferred time frames using concept elicitation techniques and content analyses. We then administered the top 4 preferred variants using 1- and 4-weeks' time frames with the original intensity or an alternative frequency response scale alongside EQ-5D-5L and St George Respiratory Questionnaire to OAD patients during 2 different visits. We compared the ceiling effects and construct validity by testing a priori hypotheses in relation to St George Respiratory Questionnaire and clinical outcomes via correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, respectively. Follow-up patients were categorized into "better," "stable," and "worse" groups to assess reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or Cohen's Kappa (k) and responsiveness using ROC analysis. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients (mean [SD] age: 54[18]; female: 37.0%) completed baseline assessments. A total of 120 patients also completed follow-up assessments (mean [SD] interval: 2.8 [1.7] months). The ceilings were lower in the variants compared with EQ-5D-5L (P < .001). Reliability of the variants were comparable to or higher than EQ-5D-5L. The c-statistic values derived from ROC analyses of the variants were consistently higher than EQ-5D-5L. CONCLUSIONS: Use of longer time frames with the original intensity or the frequency response scales may improve EQ-5D-5L's psychometric properties in OAD patients.

Impact of pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care on health-related and pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life in patients with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Data on the impact of pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care (PC) on pharmaceutical therapy-related and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and their sensitivities to PC provision in patients with heart failure (HF) are scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of pharmacist-led PC on HRQoL employing the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and 5-level EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ-5D-5L) and on pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure of Pharmaceutical Therapy (PROMPT) in HF patients and compare sensitivities to the PC provision of these three tools. METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary public hospital in Thailand between November 2022 and May 2023. Overall, 250 patients were randomly divided into the usual care (UC) (N = 124) and PC (N = 126) groups. Mixed effects models were used to investigate the differences in the mean change scores of PROMPT, EQ-5D-5L, and MLHFQ between the UC and PC groups. The sensitivities to PC provision of the three measures were evaluated using standardized effect sizes (SESs). RESULTS: Significant differences were found in five of eight domains and the total score of the PROMPT between the PC and UC groups (all p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in the EQ-5D-5L and MLHFQ between the two groups (both p > 0.05). The SESs of the five domains and total score of PROMPT ranged from 0.29 to 1.65, considered small-to-large effect sizes, whereas the SESs of EQ-5D-5L and MLHFQ were -0.4 to 0, considered small effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-led PC can positively affect pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life using PROMPT in HF patients. Additionally, PROMPT is more sensitive to PC provision than EQ-5D-5L and MLHFQ.

Association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia as defined by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus in older outpatients at a hospital specializing in geriatric medicine: A cross­sectional study with baseline data of prospective cohort study (JUSTICE­TOKYO study).

To the best of our knowledge, little is known about the association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia in university-affiliated geriatric hospital in elderly. The present study aimed to investigate, in a multidisciplinary setting, the prevalence of sarcopenia and association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia in older outpatients at Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center (Tokyo, Japan). Between October 2020 and December 2021, a cross-sectional study of outpatients aged ≥65 years [458 male (44%) and 584 female (56%); mean age, 78.2±6.1 years] was conducted to assess prevalence of sarcopenia, according to Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria, and the relationship between dietary variety status and sarcopenia. Patient profile, comorbidities, drug use, neuropsychological data, abdominal symptoms, pulmonary function and dietary variety status were collected. Of 1,042 subjects, there were 223 (21.4%) with [142 male (63.7%) and 81 female (36.3%); mean age, 80.6±6.3 years] and 819 (78.6%) without sarcopenia [316 male (38.6%) and 503 female (61.4%); mean age, 77.6±5.8]. In multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, low body mass index, high Brinkman Index and phase angle, low quality of life, history of daycare use, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis and low Mini-Mental State Examination and Dietary Variety Score were related to sarcopenia. The prevalence of sarcopenia was higher in than in community-dwelling individuals. Dietary variety status was associated with sarcopenia.

Resilience and quality of life in patients who underwent mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19, one year after discharge: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 often experience severe long-term sequelae. This study aimed to assess resilience and Quality of Life (QoL) of patients who underwent mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19, one year after discharge. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled patients who received mechanical ventilation for severe COVID-19 and were assessed one-year post-discharge. Participants completed a structured questionnaire via telephone comprising the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale (PCFS). To establish the association between QoL and resilience, Spearman correlations were calculated between the PCFS and the CD-RISC. Linear regression models were adjusted to evaluate which factors were associated with QoL, with the total score of PCFS as the dependent variable. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients were included in the analysis. The CD-RISC had a median score of 83 (IQR 74-91). The PCFS results showed that 61.3% (n = 138) of the patients were able to resume their daily activities without limitations. Among them, 37.3% (n = 84) were classified as Grade 0 and 24% (n = 54) as Grade 1. Mild and moderate functional limitations were found in 33.7% of the patients, with 24.8% (n = 56) classified as Grade 2 and 8.8% (n = 20) as Grade 3. Severe functional limitations (Grade 4) were observed in 4.8% (n = 11) of the patients. High CD-RISC scores were associated with lower levels of PCFS score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of critically ill patients who underwent mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19, 38% of patients experienced a significant decline in their QoL one year after hospital discharge. Finally, a high level of resilience was strongly associated with better QoL one year after discharge.

A New and Improved Experimental Design for the Discrete Choice Experiment Module of the EuroQol Valuation Technology Protocol.

OBJECTIVES: The EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol, which is used to value the EQ-5D-5L instrument, comprises a composite time trade-off and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) module. Despite significant limitations, the DCE module has not been updated since its inception in 2012. This study aimed to update the EQ-VT DCE design using state-of-the-art methods. METHODS: DCE data from 19 EQ-5D-5L valuation studies were summarized using a Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis model, which created the priors for our Bayesian efficient DCE design. This design comprised 20 subdesigns, each with 12 choice tasks, and included 2 levels that overlapped to reduce the complexity of the choice tasks. The relative efficiency and robustness of the new design were established by comparing the D-errors and minimal sample size requirements for the 19 within-sample and 7 out-of-sample countries with the previous DCE design. RESULTS: The updated DCE design shows large reductions in the D-error: by 20% and 22% for the 19 within-sample and 7 out-of-sample countries, respectively. Sample size requirements were also reduced, resulting in an average reduction of 45% for both the within and out-of-sample countries. CONCLUSIONS: The updated DCE design outperforms the current EQ-VT design. Given its enhanced performance and reduced complexity, it is set to replace the existing DCE design in future EQ-5D-5L valuation studies using the EQ-VT protocol.

Internal Responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in Dutch Breast Cancer Patients during the First Year Post-Surgery: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

The EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) are commonly used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for breast cancer. This study assesses and compares the internal responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in Dutch breast cancer patients during the first year post-surgery. Women diagnosed with breast cancer who completed the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 pre-operatively (T0), 6 months (T6), and 12 months post-surgery (T12) were included. Mean differences of the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 between baseline and 6 months (delta 1) and between baseline and 12 months post-surgery (delta 2) were calculated and compared against the respective minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of 0.08 and 5. Internal responsiveness was assessed using effect sizes (ES) and standardized response means (SRM) for both deltas. In total, 333 breast cancer patients were included. Delta 1 and delta 2 for the EQ-5D-5L index and most scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 were below the MCID. The internal responsiveness for both PROMs was small (ES and SRM < 0.5), with greater internal responsiveness for delta 1 compared to delta 2. The EQ-5D-5L index showed greater internal responsiveness than the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Quality of Life scale and summary score. These findings are valuable for the interpretation of both PROMs in Dutch breast cancer research and clinical care.

Population-level norm values by EQ-5D-3L in Hungary - a comparison of survey results from 2022 with those from 2000.

PURPOSE: Although population norms of the EQ-5D-3L instrument had been available in Hungary since 2000, their evaluation was based on a United Kingdom (UK) value set. Our objective was to estimate the population norms for EQ-5D-3L by using the new Hungarian value set available since 2020, to extend the scope to adolescents, and to compare with norms from 2000. METHODS: A cross sectional EQ-5D-3L survey representative of the Hungarian population was conducted in 2022. The EQ-5D-3L dimensional responses were analyzed by age and sex and compared with the survey from 2000, by estimating population frequencies with their 95% confidence intervals; index values were evaluated by both value sets. RESULTS: Altogether, 11,910 respondents, aged 12 or more (578 between 12 and 17), completed the EQ-5D-3L. There was a notable improvement in reporting problems for both sexes (age 35-64) regarding the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression compared to 2000. Below the age 44, both sexes had an EQ-5D-3L index plateau of 0.98, while above the age 55, men tended to have numerically higher index values compared to women, with the difference increasing with older age. Improvement in dimensional responses were also translated to numerically higher index values for both sexes between ages 18 and 74 compared to 2000. Multivariate regression analysis showed that higher educational attainment, lower age, larger household size, and active occupational status were associated with higher index values. CONCLUSION: Over the past 22 years, there was a large improvement in HRQoL of the middle-aged to elderly men and women in Hungary.

Health states can be described by a combination of statements of health-related quality of life measures. 'Value sets' are numerical expressions of how preferred a health state is. The provision of population-level health-related quality of life estimates (also known as 'population norms') are expected to improve the precision of patient-level clinical decision making, and health economic and public health studies. However, preference towards these health states is influenced by culture, resulting in differences across populations. While responses for the EQ-5D-3L instrument for adults have been available in Hungary since 2000, the evaluation of these responses was based on a 'value set' from the United Kingdom, rather than a Hungarian one.This research, utilizing the newly introduced Hungarian 'value set' (available since 2020) for the EQ-5D-3L instrument, offers a larger sample size, inclusion of adolescents and potentially improved sampling compared to the prior research conducted in 2000. Comparison of the two surveys allows us to estimate changes in both dimensional responses and overall health-related quality of life of the population over a 20-year time horizon, while we also compare the impact of different 'value sets' on health-related quality of life assessment. A large EQ-5D-3L improvement was observed in middle-aged-to-elderly people.

Health-related quality of life in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis - a Swedish register study.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) are scarce and studies have been restricted in terms of instruments used for assessments. OBJECTIVE: To assess generic and dermatology-specific HRQoL of patients with GPP compared with patients with plaque psoriasis using real-world data from the Swedish National Register for Systemic Treatment of Psoriasis. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 2006 to 2021 including 7041 individuals with plaque psoriasis without GPP and 80 patients with GPP, of which 19% also had plaque psoriasis. Total scores for the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), as well as degree of severity within the instruments' dimensions/questions, were compared between patient groups. RESULTS: EQ-5D scores were significantly (p < .01) lower (worse) in patients with GPP (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 0.613 [0.346]) vs. patients with plaque psoriasis (mean [SD] 0.715 [0.274]), indicating lower generic HRQoL of patients with GPP. Significantly (p < .01) higher (worse) total DLQI scores were observed for patients with GPP (mean [SD] 10.6 [8.9]) compared with patients with plaque psoriasis (mean [SD] 7.7 [7.1]), with proportionally more patients with GPP having severe (20% vs. 16%) and very severe (17% vs. 8%) problems. The worsened scores for GPP vs. plaque psoriasis were consistent across EQ-5D dimensions and DLQI questions. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with GPP have a considerable impairment in both generic and dermatology-specific HRQoL. The HRQoL was significantly worse in individuals with GPP compared to individuals with plaque psoriasis. The significant HRQoL impairment of GPP shows the potential value of better healthcare interventions for this multisystem disease.

The study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) compared to patients with plaque psoriasis using real-world data from the Swedish National Register for Systemic Treatment of Psoriasis.The results showed significantly worse HRQoL scores by two different HRQoL instruments (EuroQol-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D] and Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]) in patients with GPP compared to patients with plaque psoriasis.The study indicates that individuals with GPP have a considerable impairment in both generic and dermatology-specific HRQoL.

Health-related quality of life and utilities among Lebanese patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and utilities of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients in Lebanon using generic and MS-specific QoL instruments, categorized by disease severity, and explored factors associated with HRQoL. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective HRQoL study collecting data through face-to-face interviews using the EQ-5D-5 L and the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQoL) questionnaires. We enrolled Lebanese patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with MS for >6 months. Patients were categorized by disease severity using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores: 0-3 (mild MS), 4-6.5 (moderate MS), and 7-9 (severe MS). Bivariate and linear regression analyses were performed to study factors associated with HRQoL. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients (mean age: 43.3 years; 65.7 % females) were included. The mean EQ-5D-5 L utility score was 0.74. This score decreased significantly with disease severity (p < 0.001 for the trend): 0.93, 0.60, and 0.32 for mild, moderate, and severe MS, respectively. The mean MusiQoL global index score was 71.33 and was significantly lower for severe MS (58.68), than for moderate (65.23) and mild (77.80), (p < 0.001 for the trend). Higher educational level, lower EDSS scores, and longer disease duration were associated significantly with a higher EQ-5D-5 L utility (R2 = 0.67), while employment, lower EDSS scores, and decrease in cognitive difficulties were associated with better MusiQoL utility (R2 = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a significant and gradual deterioration in HRQoL as MS progresses, resulting in low utility scores for patients with severe MS.

Dimensions of quality of life in patients with heart failure and sarcopenia: a scoping review protocol / Dimensões da qualidade de vida em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca e sarcopenia: um protocolo de revisão de escopo

Objective: To map the dimensions of quality of life in patients with heart failure (HF) and sarcopenia. Methods: The scoping review will adhere to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis methodology and will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches will encompass MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE/Elsevier, LILACS, IBECS, BDENF (BVS), SciELO, Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics), CINAHL, Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), PsycINFO (APA), Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, and academic search engines: Google Scholar and Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE), without language or date restrictions. Inclusion criteria: Population ­ adults with HF and sarcopenia; Concept ­ Dimensions of quality of life including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression ­ defined based on the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire; Context ­ any health care setting. Two independent reviewers will select studies and extract data, with a third reviewer consulted in cases of discrepancies. Findings will be presented graphically with a narrative summary. Expected results: We aim to uncover key dimensions of quality of life in individuals with HF and sarcopenia through this scoping review. Anticipated outcomes include insights into mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression across diverse health care settings. Relevance: This review sheds light on the interplay between HF and sarcopenia and its impact on quality of life. The findings may guide interventions, inform evidence-based decision-making, and contribute to targeted strategies to improve the wellbeing of individuals managing both conditions. Review registration: Open Science Framework [https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-jn387-v1]. (AU)

Patient-reported outcome from minimal invasive surgery compared with conventional open surgery for thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.

Study design: retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. Objective: The treatment guidelines for thoracolumbar spinal fractures are controversial although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a popular alternative to the traditional open approach (TOA). Limited data exists about outcomes after MIS fracture treatment. The main aim of our study was to evaluate self-reported disability, health-related quality of life, pain, and satisfaction after MIS compared with TOA. Methods: Of 173 patients operated from 2014 to 2018, 64.7% patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the EQ-5D-5L, and a tailored clinical follow-up questionnaire on employment status, pain, activity level, and satisfaction with treatment. Results: Of the 112 patients, 34 had MIS and 78 had TOA. Mean follow-up was 56 months. The two groups were comparable on demographic variables apart from mean age - MIS group was 10 years older. The MIS group had better ODI scores (p = 0.046), but the groups were similar regarding return to work and disability retirement. The EQ-5D-5L index for the MIS were very close (mean -0.033, median +0.049) to the Danish population score, while the TOA showed a greater deviation (mean - 0.125, median -0.040). The MIS used less pain medication than the TOA. Both groups were similarly satisfied with treatment results. Conclusion: Our data indicates that MIS surgery for thoracolumbar spinal fractures can achieve acceptable self-reported outcomes in terms of disability, health-related quality of life, pain, and satisfaction with treatment. However, a randomized controlled trial is needed to determine whether the MIS approach is superior to TOA.

Health inequity assessment in Brazil: is EQ-5D-3L sensible enough to detect differences among distinct socioeconomic groups?

BACKGROUND: Multidimensional health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments, such as the EQ-5D, are increasingly used to assess inequalities in health. However, it is necessary to explore the ability of these instruments to capture differences between population groups, especially in low/middle-income countries. This study aimed to investigate whether the EQ-5D-3L instrument can detect differences in HRQOL between groups of different socioeconomic status (SES) in Brazil. METHODS: Data collection occurred during the Brazilian EQ-5D-3L valuation study and included respondents aged 18 to 64 years enrolled in urban areas. SES was aggregated into three categories: "higher" (A and B), "intermediate" (C) and "lower" (D and E). EQ-5D-3L index was calculated considering the Brazilian value set. A mixed-effects regression model was estimated with random effects on individuals and marginal effects on SES, sex, and educational attainment. Odds ratios for the chance of reporting problems for each EQ-5D dimension were estimated by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 9,148 respondents were included in the study. Mean age was 37.80 ± 13.13 years, 47.4% were men and the majority was ranked as classes B or C (38.4% and 50.7%, respectively). Participants in lower SES classes reported increasingly poorer health compared to individuals in higher classes. The mean EQ-5D-3L index decreased as SES deteriorates being significantly higher for classes A and B (0.874 ± 0.14) compared to class C (0.842 ± 0.15) and classes D and E (0.804 ± 0.17) (p < 0.001). The same was observed for the mean EQ-VAS scores (84.0 ± 13.8 in classes A and B, 81.0 ± 17 in class C and 78.3 ± 18.7 in class C [p < 0.001]). The multivariate analysis confirmed that SES is an independent factor that effects EQ-5D-3L index measures. Participants in intermediate and lower SES classes have a statistically significant lower EQ-5D-3L index compared to participants in classes A and B, regardless of age, sex, and educational attainment. CONCLUSION: In a Brazilian population sample, the EQ-5D-3L instrument was able to detect important differences between groups with distinct socioeconomic statuses (SES). The EQ-5D-3L is useful for exploring inequities in health.

EQ-5D-5L Population Norms and Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy by Sociodemographic Characteristics and Modifiable Risk Factors for Adults in Queensland, Australia.

OBJECTIVES: Over half of Australia's disease burden is due to morbidity, predominantly chronic conditions. Health-related quality of life instruments provide measures of morbidity and health status across different dimensions with EQ-5D being one of the most widely used. This study reports EQ-5D-5L general population norms for Queensland, Australia using the recently published Australian value set. METHODS: Population survey results from cross-sectional computer-assisted telephone interviews for Queensland adults in 2022 and 2023 were analyzed. EQ-5D-5L, as well as modifiable risk factors and sociodemographic data were collected. Using the recently published final Australian EQ-5D-5L value set, mean utility scores were calculated for Queensland, as well as by sociodemographic characteristics, including remoteness and socioeconomic area-based measures, and modifiable risk factors, such as smoking and body mass index. Results were combined with life tables to estimate quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for subgroups with different lifestyles. RESULTS: The EQ-5D utility score for the Queensland adult population was 0.916. Smoking daily, being obese or older in age, or living in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic area were associated with lower mean scores. QALE was 6.1 and 7.9 years shorter than the life expectancy for Queensland males and females, respectively, but generally, those who reported having healthier lifestyles had higher mean utility scores and thus longer QALE. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to reporting Queensland EQ-5D-5L general population norms, these results demonstrate potential QALE gains in people following healthier lifestyles. The results support investment in prevention and may motivate further studies in this important area.

Quality of life of patients with rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important indicator of population health and can measure the impact of medical actions. The main objective of this study was to determine the HRQoL of patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) and compare it with that of the general population. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, single-center study, with consecutive inclusion of outpatients over 18 years of age seen at a Rheumatology hospital-based outpatient clinic in Madrid. Sociodemographic, clinical variables and HRQoL were recorded. HRQoL was measured with the 5-dimension, 5-level EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L), which includes the EQ-Index (0-1 scale) and a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100 scale). A descriptive analysis and a comparison with the HRQoL of the Spanish general population were performed. RESULTS: 1144 patients were included, 820 (71.68%) women, with a mean age of 56.1 years (range 18-95), of whom 241 (25.44%) were new patients. In patients with RD, the HRQoL measured with the EQ-Index and with the VAS, was 0.186 and 12 points lower, respectively, than in the general population. The decrease in HRQoL affected the 5 health dimensions, especially "pain/discomfort", followed by "daily activities" and "mobility". This reduction in HRQoL was observed in both men and women, and in all age ranges, although it was greater between 18 and 65 years of age. The reduction in HRQoL affected all RD subtypes, especially the "peripheral and axial mechanical pathology" and the "soft tissue pathology" group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rheumatic diseases report worse HRQoL when compared to the general population in all dimensions of HRQoL.

Inferior long-term outcomes after surgery for lumbar disc herniation in patients with prior lumbar spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous lumbar spine surgery is a frequent exclusion criterion for studies evaluating lumbar surgery outcomes. In real-life clinical settings, this patient population is important, as a notable proportion of patients evaluated for lumbar spine surgery have undergone prior lumbar surgery already previously. Knowledge about the long-term outcomes after microdiscectomy on patients with previous lumbar surgery and how they compare to those of first-time surgery is lacking. METHODS: The original patient cohort for screening included 615 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for lumbar disc herniation, with a median follow-up time of 18.1 years. Of these patients, 89 (19%) had undergone lumbar spine surgery prior to the index surgery. Propensity score matching (based on age, sex, and follow-up time) was utilized to match two patients without prior surgery with each patient with a previous surgery. The primary outcome measure was the need for further lumbar spine surgery during the follow-up period, and the secondary outcome measures consisted of present-time patient-reported outcome measures (Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol-5D) and present-time ability to carry out employment. RESULTS: Patients who received previous lumbar surgeries had a higher need for further surgery (44% vs. 28%, p = 0.009) and had a shorter time to further surgery than the propensity score-matched cohort (mean Kaplan-Meier estimate, 15.7 years vs. 19.8 years, p = 0.008). Patients with prior surgery reported inferior Oswestry Disability Index scores (13.7 vs. 8.0, p = 0.036). and EQ-5D scores (0.77 vs. 0.86, p = 0.01). In addition, they had a higher frequency of receiving lumbar spine-related disability pensions than the other patients (12% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with previous lumbar surgery had inferior long-term outcomes compared to patients without prior surgery. However, the vast majority of these patients improved quickly after the index surgery. Furthermore, the difference in the patients' reported outcomes was small at the long-term follow-up, and they reported high satisfaction with the results of the study surgery. Hence, surgery for these patients should be considered if surgical indications are met, but special care needs must be accounted for when deliberating upon their indications for surgery.