The Statistical Fragility of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Research: A Systematic Review.

Background: A P value of <.05 is often used to denote statistical significance; however, in many scenarios, this threshold is vulnerable to a small number of outcome reversals. This study joins a body of studies within the orthopaedic literature that evaluate the statistical fragility of existing research via metrics such as fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the statistical fragility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies on the topic, given the resurgent interest in lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to augment primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that the outcomes reported in these studies would be statistically fragile. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Comparative studies and RCTs regarding LET as an adjunct procedure to ACLR published between 2000 and 2022 were analyzed. Descriptive characteristics, dichotomous outcomes, and continuous outcomes were extracted. The FI and continuous FI (CFI) were calculated by the number of event reversals to change significance; the FQ and continuous FQ (CFQ) were calculated to normalize the fragility metrics per sample size. Results: Of 455 studies screened, 29 studies were included (9 RCTs, 20 comparative); 79.3% of included studies were published after 2020. A total of 48 dichotomous and 265 continuous outcomes were analyzed. The median FI was 9.0 (IQR, 7.0-13.3), with FQ of 0.1 (IQR, 0.04-0.17); the median CFI was 7.8 (IQR, 4.2-19.6), with CFQ of 0.12 (IQR, 0.08-0.19). The FQ and CFQ for studies on LET with revision ACLR were larger (0.117 and 0.113, respectively) than those focused on primary ACLR (0.042 and 0.095, respectively). Conclusion: Studies focused on LET with primary ACLR were more fragile than those on LET with revision, which suggests that further research on the indications for LET with primary ACLR is necessary. Future orthopaedic comparative research should include fragility metrics alongside traditional P values.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in association to All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not modify return to play in basketball players: A comparative cohort study. / La aumentación con tenodesis extraarticular de la reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior asociado a la técnica «all-inside¼ no modifica la vuelta al deporte en jugadores de baloncesto federados: estudio de cohortes comparativo.

INTRODUCTION: Return to play rates after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction range between 50-98% depending on sport professionality, without being modified by the addition of an extra-articular augmentation (EA). The objective of the study is to describe the rate of return to play in our cohort. The hypothesis is that the addition of EA increases that rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive and analytical study of a 130 basketball players cohort between 18 and 45 years old, whom underwent ACL reconstruction between the years 2018 and 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Data was collected by reviewing medical records. IKDC score was registered after one year from surgery. All patients operated from 2020 received an extra-articular tenodesis. RESULTS: Of all patients, 72.31% returned to training, 70.77% returned to competition and 46.15% returned to the same level of performance prior to injury. The EA group (46.15%) did not increase the rate of return to competition (P=.552) nor to the same level of performance (P=.664). The mean IKDC. score was 86.83 (SD 14.85), and was not higher in the EA group (P=.418). However, its value was higher in the players who returned to training, competition and level of performance (P<.05). EA did not delay the return to play in any group (P=.282). CONCLUSION: To sum up, the EA does not modify the return to sport rate. Higher IKDC values predict a greater return to sport rate. in all groups. Prospective studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up time are required.

No difference in stability among various knee flexion angles during fixation of anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) fixation at low versus high flexion angles during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on rotation or translational knee stability. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this study were (1) cadaveric study, (2) cadaveric specimens underwent ACLR, (3) cadaveric specimen underwent ALLR or LET and (4) specimen preparation technique described the knee flexion angle at the time of ALLR or LET tensioning and fixation. A priori, 'low flexion' was defined as 0-30° and 'high flexion' was defined as 60-90° at graft fixation. Main outcomes of interest included internal rotation and anterior translation. Results: Data from 92 cadaveric knees (from 9 studies) were extracted and included in the meta-analysis. The mean pooled value for internal rotation was 10.1° (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-14.5°) for the low flexion group and 11.5° (95% CI, 7.4-15.7°) for the high flexion group (n.s.). The mean pooled value for anterior translation was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 0.5-8.1 mm) for the low flexion group and 3.0 mm (95% CI, 1.1-5.0 mm) for the high flexion group (n.s.). Conclusion: This meta-analysis of existing biomechanical research found that the rotational and translational stability of the knee were not significantly different between scenarios in which ALLR or LET fixation was performed at low knee flexion angles (0-30°) versus high knee flexion angles (60-90°). Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Combined ACLR and lateral extra-articular tenodesis with a continuous iliotibial band autograft is a viable option in a population of athletes who participate in pivoting sports.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results, return to sport and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) associated with lateral extra-articular tenodesis using continuous plasty with an iliotibial band. METHODS: This was a prospective multicentre study involving 186 patients who had surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Patients with multiligament ruptures and revision surgery were excluded from the study. All patients included were involved in pivoting sports and wished to resume their activity after surgery. Patients were assessed at a minimum 2-year follow-up using functional and psychological questionnaires (subjective International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner, Lysholm and ACL-RSI scores), ligament assessment including instrumented laxity measurement (Rolimeter), Lachman test and pivot shift and isokinetic testing. Return to sport was assessed using a questionnaire, and complications and repeat surgeries were recorded. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 43.1 months, the subjective IKDC, Lysholm, ACL-RSI and objective IKDC scores were significantly improved (59.8 vs. 94.5 p < 0.0001, 75 vs. 99 p < 0.0001, 60 vs. 93 p < 0.0001, IKDC A 0% vs. 72%, B 12% vs. 27%, C 60% vs. 1% D 28% vs. 0% p < 0.0001). The Tegner activity level was 9 (3-10) before the accident and 9 (3-10) at the last review. Seventy-six percent of the patients had returned to sports at the same level. The differential laxity was 6.6 mm (±1.7) preoperatively and 1.1 mm (±1.4) postoperatively. Additionally, 97% were equal in pivot shift at the last follow-up. At the 6-month isokinetic assessment, the muscle strength recovery for the quadriceps and hamstring was over 85% compared with the healthy side for 79% and 70% of the patients, respectively. Ten patients had graft rupture (5.6%). Four (2.4%) patients had a contralateral ACL rupture, and seven (4%) underwent a reoperation with meniscectomy. CONCLUSION: Anterior ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis using a continuous strip of iliotibial band enables 76% of patients in a population with a high demand for sports to resume their activities at the same level. The clinical results and complication rates, particularly reruptures (5.6%), were similar to those of other techniques involving lateral extra-articular tenodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis does not enhance ACL graft healing, however, does reduce graft tunnel widening.

PURPOSE: The study hypothesized that the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) had a significant effect on ACL graft healing. METHODS: A total of 80 patients were divided into two cohorts matched for gender, age, body mass index, time from surgery to post-operative MRI and graft diameter. Forty patients underwent ACL reconstruction alone, while 40 underwent ACLR in addition to LEAT. Patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan at 12 months post-surgery; tunnel apertures were measured using multiplanar reformation, graft healing was assessed using signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) in three regions of interest and finally graft maturity and integration were classified using the Howell and Ge scale, respectively. In addition, clinical evaluation and patient-reported outcome measures were collected. RESULTS: The mean femoral tunnel widening at 12 months post-surgery was 39.8 ± 14.0% in the ACLR + LEAT group and 55.2 ± 12.7% in the ACLR alone group (p < 0.05). The mean tibial tunnel widening was 29.3 ± 12.7% in the ACLR + LEAT group and 44.4 ± 12.1% in the ACLR group (p < 0.05). The mean adjusted graft SNQ was 9.0 ± 14.9 in the ACLR + LEAT group and 9.5 ± 11.4 in the ACLR group (n.s.). CONCLUSION: At 1 year post-operatively, we noted significantly less femoral and tibial tunnel widening in the ACLR + LEAT group. LEAT did not result in a statistically significant effect on graft healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Lower anxiety level to perform movements after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the anxiety level to perform movements in patients after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) compared to patients after revision ACLR without LET. METHODS: Ninety patients who underwent revision ACLR with ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who received revision ACLR in combination with LET (revision ACLR_LET group; mean follow-up: 29.4 months, range: 12-80 months), and patients who received revision ACLR without LET (revision ACLR group; mean follow-up: 61.1 months, range: 22-192 months). All patients filled in a questionnaire about anxiety level related to physical activity and sports, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (IKDCsubjective), and the Tegner Activity Score. RESULTS: Patients in the revision ACLR_LET group had a significantly lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients in the revision ACLR group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in KOOS, IKDCsubjective, and Tegner Activity Scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received LET in addition to revision ACLR have a lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients with revision ACLR alone, despite non-different subjective functional outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, Level of evidence: III.

Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis and Anterolateral Procedures.

The treatment of rotational instability has been an intriguing challenge since the era of modern anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. Lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) have emerged as a solution to this problem, particularly in high-risk populations. Several studies have shown significant benefits of combining LEAPs with ACL reconstruction, including reduced graft failure rates, improved knee stability, improved rotational stability, and higher return-to-play rates. These findings have led to an in-depth evaluation of LEAPs as lateral extra-articular tenodesis and anterolateral ligament reconstruction and their potential role in improving outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Associated Procedures.

Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common yet devastating complication due to inferior clinical outcomes associated with revision ACLR. Identifying the cause and associated risk factors for failure is the most important consideration during preoperative planning. Special attention to tunnel quality, concomitant injuries, and modifiable risk factors will help determine the optimal approach and staging for revision ACLR. Additional procedures including lateral extra-articular tenodesis and osteotomy may be considered for at-risk populations. The purpose of this review is to explore causes of ACLR failure, clinical indications and appropriate patient evaluation, and technical considerations when performing revision ACLR.

Avoiding Graft Failure: Lessons Learned from the Stability Trial.

The Stability Study was a multicenter, pragmatic, parallel groups, randomized clinical trial comparing hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis in young patients at high risk of graft failure. Having recruited 618 patients with a 5% loss to follow up, we were able to demonstrate a clinically and statistically significant reduction in clinical failure and graft rupture at 2 years postoperative. No differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were demonstrated between groups; however, patients who experienced an adverse event had significantly worse PROs than those who did not.

Quantitative MRI Analysis of Patellofemoral Joint Cartilage Health 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis.

BACKGROUND: The addition of an iliotibial band-based lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to reduce failure rates. However, there are concerns as to the potential overconstraint of tibiofemoral kinematics that may increase the risk of cartilage degradation. To date, no clinical study has investigated the effect of LET on patellofemoral joint articular cartilage health. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that at 2 years postoperatively, (1) the addition of LET at the time of ACLR would have no effect on cartilage health on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (2) higher cartilage relaxation values would be associated with worse patient-reported and functional outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A subset of patients from the STABILITY 1 randomized controlled trial were included. All patients underwent primary ACLR with a hamstring autograft. Patients were randomized to either LET augmentation or not. Cartilage status in the patellofemoral joint between the ACLR group and ACLR+LET group was compared using 2-year postoperative quantitative MRI and the ACL osteoarthritis scores of both the surgical and the contralateral nonsurgical knees. Objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were attained. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients (43 patients in the ACLR group; mean age, 18.9 ± 3.2 years; 60.5% female; and 49 patients in the ACLR+LET group; mean age, 18.7 ± 3.2 years, 63.3% female) were included. No significant differences were seen in the mean values (ms) for adjusted T1ρ/T2 relaxation times in the medial patella (47.8/42.2 vs 47.3/43.2), central patella (45.5/42.5 vs 44.1/42.7), lateral patella (48.2/43.5 vs 47.3/43.0), medial trochlea (54.7/50.9 vs 56.4/50.9), central trochlea (53.3/51.1 vs 53.1/52.0), and lateral trochlea (54.9/52.1 vs 53.9/52.6) between the ACLR and ACLR+LET groups. No difference in overall ACL osteoarthritis scores was observed (P = .99). An increase in medial patellar T2 relaxation times was associated with a decreasing International Knee Documentation Committee score (P = .046), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Symptoms subscale score (P = .01), and total KOOS (P = .01). CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference in patellofemoral cartilage health between knees 2 years after primary ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft with or without LET. Statistically significant correlations were found between quantitative MRI relaxation times, functional outcome scores, and PROMs; however, the correlations were weak and the clinical significance is unknown. REGISTRATION: NCT02018354 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Evaluation of Anterior Tibial Translation Under Physiological Axial Load After ACL Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.

Background: Postoperative laxity correlates with negative clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The influence of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) on anteroposterior translation is unclear. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aimed to evaluate the reduction in radiographic static anterior tibial translation (SATT) and dynamic anterior tibial translation (DATT) after LET as an adjunctive procedure to ACLR. It was hypothesized that adding a LET procedure would have no effect on postoperative SATT and DATT. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts between 2020 and 2022 were reviewed, and those who underwent ACLR and LET as an anterolateral associate procedure were paired 1 to 1 with those who underwent isolated ACLR (control) based on age, sex, preoperative SATT, and posterior tibial slope (PTS). The indications for LET were age <18 years and anterolateral rotary instability (grade ≥2 pivot shift). A previously validated technique was used to measure SATT, DATT, and PTS on lateral weightbearing and lateral stress knee radiographs. Preoperative and 9-month postoperative radiographs were compared between the 2 groups. Results: A total of 72 patients were included in the analysis (n = 36 patients in each group). The inter- and intraobserver reliability of the SATT, DATT, and PTS measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.88-0.99). The mean pre- and postoperative SATT in the ACLR+LET group was 2.44 ± 2.90 mm and 2.44 ± 2.38 mm, respectively, compared with 2.60 ± 2.99 mm and 2.12 ± 2.74 mm, respectively, in the control group. The mean pre- and postoperative reduction in side-to-side DATT in the ACLR+LET group was 5.44 ± 4.65 mm and 1.13 ± 2.95 mm, respectively, compared with 5.03 ± 3.66 mm and 2 ± 3.12 mm, respectively, in the control group. There was no pre- to postoperative difference in SATT (P = .51). However, the side-to-side DATT was reduced by 3.66 ± 3.37 mm postoperatively (P < .001), without significant differences between groups (P = .24). Conclusion: Including a LET procedure for patients undergoing ACLR did not reduce SATT; that is, it did not decrease the amount of tibial translation due to physiological axial load.

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) combined with revision ACL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis results in significantly improved outcomes, but patient-reported knee function is inferior compared to an isolated MAT.

PURPOSE: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is a valuable option for postmeniscectomy syndrome in young and active patients, which can successfully improve symptoms, function and quality of life. This study aimed to report outcomes and complications in patients treated with isolated MAT or MAT combined with revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). METHODS: In total, 18 patients who were treated with MAT using a soft tissue fixation technique were retrospectively analysed. Patients were allocated into two groups, the isolated MAT group and the MAT plus revision ACLR + LET group (MAT+ group). Both groups were assessed using the following Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner Activity Scale, Lysholm score, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) statement. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 3.2 years and the mean age of patients was 29 (±7.6) years. Ten patients were treated with isolated MAT and eight patients were treated with MAT combined with revision ACLR and LET. No complications and no reoperations were reported. In both groups, all PROMs significantly improved postoperatively (p < 0.05), except for the Tegner score in the MAT+ group, which did not reach statistical significance (not significant [n.s.]). No significant difference was found postoperatively in PROMs between the MAT and the MAT+ group; however, differences in the KOOS Symptoms, Sports and Quality-of-life subscales reached the minimal clinically important threshold. Mean values were: IKDC 61.2 (±13.9) versus 64.7 (±23.2), KOOS Total 72.8 (±14.9) versus 68.0 (±16.7), Lysholm score 83.2 (±11) versus 84.2 (±8.7) and EQ-5D-5L 71.8 (±14.9) versus 72.2 (±22.4). Median values for the Tegner Activity Scale were 4 versus 3. PASS statement was negative in 37.5% of the MAT+ group in comparison to 20% of the MAT group (n.s.). CONCLUSION: In terms of patient-reported outcomes, MAT is an effective and safe procedure, even when combined with revision ACLR + LET. Compared to the preoperative assessment, a significant improvement of the postoperative PROMs can be expected either when MAT is performed isolated or in combination with ACLR + LET. However, clinically important differences between the two groups can be noted in favour of the isolated MAT procedure, especially regarding symptoms and sporting activity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis may be more cost-effective than independent anterolateral ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and economic analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Anterolateral augmentation during primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may lower rates of ACL graft failure. However, differences in costs between two techniques, lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis comparing LET versus ALLR in the setting of primary ACLR. The hypothesis was that LET is more cost-effective than ALLR. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review was conducted on studies in which patients underwent primary ACLR with a concomitant LET or ALLR with minimum 24 months follow-up published between January 2013 and July 2023. Primary outcomes included ACL graft failure rates and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey-Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL) subscale scores, which were used to determine health utilities measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. A decision tree model with one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses compared the cost of primary ACLR with a concomitant LET, independent autograft ALLR, or independent allograft ALLR. Costs were estimated using a combination of QALYs, institution prices, literature references, and a survey sent to 49 internationally recognized high-volume knee surgeons. FINDINGS: A total of 2505 knees undergoing primary ACLR with concomitant LET (n=1162) or ALLR (n=1343) were identified from 22 studies. There were 77 total ACL graft failures with comparable failure rates between patients receiving LET versus ALLR (2.9% vs. 3.2%, P=0.690). The average QALYs gained was slightly higher for those who received LET (0.77) compared to ALLR (0.75). Survey results revealed a 5 minute longer median self-reported operative time for ALLR (20 â€‹min) than LET (15 â€‹min). The estimated costs for LET, autograft ALLR, and allograft ALLR were $1,015, $1,295, and $3,068, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Anterolateral augmentation during primary ACLR with LET is more cost-effective than independent autograft and allograft ALLR given the lower costs and comparable clinical outcomes. Surgeons may utilize this information when determining the optimal approach to anterolateral augmentation during primary ACLR, although differences in preferred technique and health care systems may influence operative efficiency and material costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review; Level of evidence, IV.

Higher contact pressure of the lateral tibiofemoral joint in lateral extra-articular tenodesis with tensioned graft in external rotation than in neutral rotation: A biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the mean contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and mean contact area of the lateral tibiofemoral joint in lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with tension on the graft in tibial neutral and external rotation. METHODS: A total of eight Thiel-embalmed cadaveric knees were prepared and divided into two groups (4 knees in each group): the LET-NR group (lateral extra-articular tenodesis tension in neutral rotation) and (2) the LET-ER group (lateral extra-articular tenodesis tension in external rotation). Each knee was prepared according to the corresponding technique. A hydraulic testing system (E10000, Instron) simulates an axial load of 735 â€‹N for 10 â€‹s in each group. RESULTS: The LET-ER group exhibited a statistically significant higher peak contact pressure compared to the LET-NR group. The peak contact pressure values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 702.3 â€‹± â€‹233.9 â€‹kPa and 1235.5 â€‹± â€‹171.4 â€‹kPa, respectively (p â€‹= â€‹0.010, 95% CI, -888.0 to -178.5). The mean contact pressure values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 344.9 â€‹± â€‹69.0 â€‹kPa and 355.3 â€‹± â€‹34.9 â€‹kPa, respectively (p â€‹= â€‹0.796, 95% CI, -105.1-84.2). The mean contact area values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 36.8 â€‹± â€‹3.1 mm2 and 33.3 â€‹± â€‹6.4 mm2, respectively (p â€‹= â€‹0.360, 95% CI, -5.2-12.2). CONCLUSIONS: The peak contact pressure of the lateral tibiofemoral joint is greater in LET when the graft is tensioned in external rotation than in neutral rotation. However, no statistically significant difference in the mean contact pressure or the mean contact area was observed between the two groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Arthroscopic Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction With Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis With Unusual Arthroscopic Meniscal Findings in a Case of an Adolescent Girl Previously Diagnosed With Amniotic Band Syndrome.

Amniotic band syndrome (ABS) constriction rings in the lower limb are common. Despite this, there is insufficient literature on anatomical abnormalities in the knee joints of children with ABS. There is an increasing incidence of paediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries recently. ACL reconstruction in this population has an extra dilemma of sparing the physis to prevent growth disturbances. Treating both these conditions simultaneously is a challenge that is rarely encountered. In our literature review, we found no case such as this. As such a case is being described for the first time, we also found certain meniscal anatomical variations on diagnostic arthroscopy. A 12-year-old adolescent Indian girl presented with an ACL tear in her left leg after a school sports injury. She had a known case of ABS constriction bands in both her lower limbs. Her distal femoral and proximal femoral physis was fused on radiographs, so we went ahead with a transphyseal ACL soft-tissue graft reconstruction. On the diagnostic round, we found an anatomical variation of the menisci, which was previously not described since arthroscopy of the knee in an adolescent kid with ABS has not been published in the literature as of yet. These kinds of clinical presentations can become common in the future as more and more kids with ABS take part in recreational sports. In such a scenario, having knowledge about common anatomical variations in the knee of such syndromic patients is essential. While performing ACL reconstructions in this population, we have to be aware of the risk of growth deformities along with vascular and neurological complications, which are added risks with constriction bands around the lower limb.

Why Your Patient May Need an ACL Reconstruction Plus Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Procedure.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common knee injuries experienced by active individuals engaging in cutting sports. Despite improved surgical techniques and rehabilitation, the return to sport rate and re-tear rates remain unsatisfactory. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is a procedure that has been growing in interest when performed in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. The benefits of adding an LET procedure to an ACL surgery may include greater rotational stability, decreased re-tear rates, and improved return to play. Level of evidence: V.

Anterolateral augmentation procedures during anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in skeletally immature patients: Scoping review of surgical techniques and outcomes.

Purpose: Graft failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in children and adolescents are higher compared to adults. Anterolateral augmentation procedures have recently generated increased focus regarding their ability to reduce graft failure rates. Concerns in skeletally immatures are potential growth disturbances and overconstraint after anterolateral augmentation. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of all current anterolateral augmentation procedures in skeletally immature patients and to discuss surgical techniques, clinical and biomechanical outcomes. Methods: This scoping review was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) statement extension for scoping reviews. On 22 December 2022, an information specialist performed a systematic literature search in Cochrane, PubMed (Medline) and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were anterolateral augmentation procedures, including lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), in combination with ACLR in skeletally immatures. Results: Twenty studies were included after screening 1.485 abstracts. Seventeen studies describe LET techniques, four studies ALLR techniques and one study both techniques. Biomechanical data is scarce and shows conflicting results. Two studies compared ACLR with LET to ACLR in skeletally immatures with promising results in favour of the combined procedure. There were no differences in outcomes between LET and ALLR. Conclusions: Several LET and ALLR techniques have been described for skeletally immature patients and the first clinical data on LET and ALLR is available, which showed promising results. Further research is necessary to evaluate the risk of growth disturbances and overconstraint in skeletally immatures. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Knee Flexion Angle of Fixation During Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Lateral Extra-articular Reinforcement Techniques Performed in Conjunction With ACL Reconstruction.

Background: Anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being used more frequently in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the knee flexion angle at which fixation of ALLR or LET is performed during the procedure is quite variable based on existing technique descriptions. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to identify whether flexion angle at the time of ALLR/LET fixation affected postoperative outcomes in a clinical population. It was hypothesized that ALLR/LET fixation at low versus high flexion angles would lead to no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures and graft failure rates. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify published clinical studies of ACLR with ALLR/LET in which the knee flexion angle at the time of ALLR/LET was reported. A priori, low flexion was defined as 0° to 30°, and high flexion was defined as 60° to 90°. Studies were excluded if the flexion angle was between 31° and 59° because these angles constituted neither low nor high flexion angles and including them in an analysis of high versus low flexion angle at fixation would have biased the study results toward the null. The overall risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled results of the studies were analyzed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scores, along with reported graft failure rates. Results: A total of 32 clinical studies (5230 patients) met inclusion criteria: 22 studies (1999 patients) in the low-flexion group and 10 studies (3231 patients) in the high-flexion group. The median Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was 6. Comparisons of patients with a low flexion angle versus a high flexion angle demonstrated no differences in the IKDC (P = .84), Lysholm (P = .67), or Tegner (P = .44) scores or in graft failure (3.4% vs 4.1%, respectively; P = .69). Conclusion: The results of this review indicated that ACLR performed in conjunction with ALLR/LET provides good to excellent patient-reported outcomes and low graft failure rates when ALLR/LET fixation is performed in either low or high knee flexion.

A review of Marcel Lemaire's original work on lateral extra-articular tenodesis.

This classic discusses Marcel Lemaire's original publications in the context of modern surgical practice, including a description of his original lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Previously published in French, these translations shed light on his revelations regarding the anterior cruciate ligament's role in knee stability and his detailed insights into the ressaut rotatoire or the pivot shift phenomenon. We track the evolution of Lemaire's procedure since the publication of his original technique in 1967 which used a nylon cord superficial to the lateral collateral ligament followed by cast immobilisation for one month. We report his patient outcomes as he refines his methods through experiential learning. Lemaire's fundamental concepts in relation to anterior cruciate ligament deficiency remain relevant in contemporary clinical practice. Furthermore, the "modified Lemaire technique" has emerged as one of the preferred methods for lateral extra-articular tenodesis. We hope that disseminating his thoughts to a wider audience will help enlighten the ongoing debate regarding the management of rotatory instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V - Expert Opinion.

A lateral extra-articular tenodesis without additional hardware: Surgical technique and biomechanical comparison with an anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction in the augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to describe a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) using no additional hardware and compare the tibiofemoral kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction augmented with either the LET or a standard anatomic anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction using intra-tunnel fixation. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees were mounted on a robotic testing system and underwent a kinematic assessment of anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot-shift in the following states: ACL-intact, ACL-sectioned, ACL-sectioned/anterolateral complex (ALC)-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed/ALC-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed/ALL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/LET. For the LET, an iliotibial autograft was passed under the fibular collateral ligament and secured to the femur with the pull sutures of the ACL reconstruction femoral cortical suspensory fixation device, positioned at the distal ridge of Kaplan's fibers. RESULTS: Anterior tibial translation was restored to normal by ACL reconstruction without meaningful benefit of augmentation with LET or ALL. ACL reconstruction restored internal tibial rotation close to normal between 0° and 30°, but increased internal tibial rotation persisted between 45° and 90°. Augmentation of ACL reconstruction with the LET reduced internal rotation close to normal between 45° and 90°, whereas increased internal rotation persisted after ALL reconstruction. CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction and LET are complementary in controlling tibiofemoral kinematics of knees with a combined ACL and ALC injury: ACL reconstruction restored native tibiofemoral kinematics except for internal rotation at flexion greater than 30°. The increased internal rotation at flexion greater than 30° was restored to normal with an LET, but not with an ALL reconstruction.