RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: In Germany, the reimbursement of orthodontic treatment costs within the framework of the statutory health insurance (GKV) was restricted on 01 January 2002 by the introduction of the orthodontic indication groups (KIG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of findings requiring treatment in a specialist practice over a 20-year period. The results were then compared with data from existing older studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The distribution of treatment-eligible KIG (KIG classifications grades 3-5) among patients with statutory health insurance in an orthodontic practice in North Rhine was determined over a 20-year period (2002-2021) after the introduction of the KIG system. This period was additionally scrutinized in four 5year periods according to the operating cycles of the practice. Findings were classified into the highest of 19 possible KIG treatment needs levels. Multiple classifications were not made. RESULTS: Orthodontic treatment was indicated in a total of 4537 (2393â¯female, 2144â¯male) patients according to current statutory health insurance guidelines. The KIG classification "D" (increased overjet) was the most frequent within the observed 20 years with 24.3%. Among 11 KIG classifications, 86.1% of the 6 most frequent and 13.9% of the 5 rarest findings were observed constantly over all periods. Of 19 possible indications, "D4" was the most frequent with 19.6%. Of 4537 patients, 20.7% had KIG grade 3, 63.6% KIG grade 4 and 15.7% KIG grade 5. The prevalence of sagittal deviations "D" and "M" was 35.0%, transverse "B" and "K" 17.9% and vertical "O" and "T" 3.7%. Tooth position anomalies "E" and "P" had a share of 24.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms existing findings as well as the nationwide data of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Dentists (KZBV) from 2020: The sagittal deviations "D" (increased overjet) and "M" (negative overjet) represented the most frequent findings with KIG D4 as the most common classification. The prevalence and age distribution of KIG grades 3-5 requiring treatment corresponded to nationwide comparative data.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) impairment in a national representative sample of 8 to 9 year olds in Germany and to evaluate the impact of orthodontic treatment need. METHODS: Data were collected in the Sixth German Oral Health Study (Sechste Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie, DMS 6) and subjects were sampled using a multistage sampling technique. OHRQoL was measured with a modified version of the 5item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5) which was administered in a computer-assisted personal interview. Children were also examined for malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need. RESULTS: In all, 1892 children aged 8-9 years were invited to take part. Finally, data of 705 children (48.6% female) could be included in the analysis. The OHIP5 mean was 1.3 (±2.0). There was no relevant influence from age and gender on the OHIP5 summary scores (râ¯< 0.10), but the summary scores differed when analyzed separately regarding orthodontic treatment need or no orthodontic treatment need (1.5⯱ 2.0 vs. 1.2⯱ 1.9, pâ¯= 0.020). Nevertheless, the level appears to be low. CONCLUSIONS: Malocclusions with orthodontic treatment need have an influence on OHRQoL.
Assuntos
Má Oclusão , Saúde Bucal , Qualidade de Vida , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Má Oclusão/diagnóstico , Má Oclusão/epidemiologia , Má Oclusão/terapia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Self-perceived oral health is affected not only by awareness of the clinical status but also by comparisons with people of a similar age. This study explored the relative contributions of clinical variables assessing caries, periodontal status, and prosthetic status to self-perceived oral health within two age groups. Data of 891 adults (35-44 yr of age) and 760 older people (65-74 yr of age) from the Fourth German Oral Health Study (DMS IV, 2005) were evaluated. Self-perceived oral health was obtained from questionnaires. Numbers of decayed, filled, and unreplaced teeth, mean attachment loss, bleeding on probing (BOP), the presence of a fixed denture, and the presence of a removable denture were assessed. Multinomial logistic regression models were developed for both age groups, separately, using stepwise methods. For adults, unreplaced teeth, filled teeth, decayed teeth, the presence of a removable denture, and mean attachment loss were added to the final model. For older people, the presence of a removable denture, unreplaced teeth, decayed teeth, mean attachment loss, filled teeth, and BOP were included in the final model. Awareness of the relative contributions of clinical variables to self-perceived oral health is important for obtaining a clearer understanding of patients' subjective and objective self-perceptions of oral health.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Saúde Bucal/classificação , Autoimagem , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Conscientização , Índice CPO , Cárie Dentária/classificação , Cárie Dentária/psicologia , Prótese Dentária/psicologia , Restauração Dentária Permanente/classificação , Restauração Dentária Permanente/psicologia , Prótese Total/psicologia , Prótese Parcial Fixa/psicologia , Prótese Parcial Removível/psicologia , Feminino , Alemanha , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/classificação , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/psicologia , Doenças Periodontais/classificação , Doenças Periodontais/psicologia , Índice Periodontal , Perda de Dente/classificação , Perda de Dente/psicologiaRESUMO
AIM: To develop models for periodontitis using self-reported questions and to validate them externally. METHODS: The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-0) was used for model development. Periodontitis was defined according to the definitions of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention-American Academy of Periodontology, the 5th European Workshop in Periodontology, and Dietrich et al. (≥2 teeth with inter-proximal clinical attachment loss of ≥4 mm and 6 mm as moderate and severe periodontitis) respectively. These models were validated in SHIP-Trend and the Fourth German Oral Health Study (DMS IV). RESULTS: Final models included age, gender, education, smoking, bleeding on brushing and self-reported presence of mobile teeth. Concordance-statistics (C-statistics) of the final models from SHIP-0 were 0.84, 0.82 and 0.85 for the three definitions respectively. Validation in SHIP-Trend revealed C-statistics of 0.82, 0.81 and 0.82 respectively. As bleeding on brushing and presence of mobile teeth were unavailable in DMS IV, reduced models were developed. C-statistics of reduced models were 0.82, 0.81 and 0.83 respectively. Validation in DMS IV revealed C-statistics of 0.72, 0.78 and 0.72 for the three definitions respectively. All p values of the goodness-of-fit tests were >0.05. CONCLUSIONS: The models yielded a moderate usefulness for prediction of periodontitis.