Case Study 11: Considerations for Enzyme Mapping Experiments-Interaction Between the Aldehyde Oxidase Inhibitor Hydralazine and Glutathione.

Often it may be convenient and efficient to address multiple research questions with a single experiment. In many instances, however, the best approach is to design the experiment to address one question at a time. The design of enzyme mapping experiments is discussed in this chapter, focusing on considerations pertinent to the study of aldehyde oxidase (AO) vs. cytochrome P450 metabolism. Specifically, a case is presented in which reduced glutathione (GSH) was included in an experiment with human liver S9 fraction to trap reactive metabolites generated from cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of lapatinib and its O-dealkylated metabolite, M1 (question 1). The AO inhibitor hydralazine was included in this experiment to investigate the involvement of AO-mediated metabolism of M1 (question 2). The presence of GSH was found to interfere with the inhibitory activity of hydralazine. Consideration of the time-dependent nature of hydralazine inhibitory activity toward AO when designing this experiment could have predicted the potential for GSH to interfere with hydralazine. This case underscores the importance of clearly identifying the research question, tailoring the experimental protocol to answer that question, and then meticulously considering how the experimental conditions could influence the results, particularly if attempting to address multiple questions with a single experiment.

A high-throughput glutathione trapping assay with combined high sensitivity and specificity in high-resolution mass spectrometry by applying product ion extraction and data-dependent neutral loss.

Reactive metabolites are thought to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of some drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions (IADRs), which is of concern to patient safety and has been a cause of drugs being withdrawn from the market place. To identify drugs with a lower propensity for causing DILI and/or IADRs, high-throughput assays to capture reactive metabolites are required in pharmaceutical industry for early drug discovery risk assessment. We describe the development of an assay to detect glutathione adducts with combined high sensitivity, enhanced specificity, and rapid data analysis. In this assay, compounds were incubated with human liver microsomes and a mixture of 1:1 of GSH (γ-GluCysGly): GSX(γ-GluCysGly-13 C2 15 N) in a 96-well plate format. UPLC-UV and LTQ Orbitrap XL were employed to detect GSH-adducts using the following mass spectrometry setups: (a) selected ion monitoring (SIM) at m/z of 274 ± 3 Da in negative mode with in-source fragmentation (SCID), which enables simultaneously monitoring two characteristic product ions of m/z 272.0888 (γ-glutamyl-dehydroalanyl-glycine) and 275.0926 (γ-glutamyl-dehydroalanyl-glycine-13 C2 15 N); (b) full scan mode for acquisition of exact mass of glutathione adducts; (c) data-dependent MS2 scan through isotopic matching (M:M + 3.00375 = 1:1) for monitoring neutral loss fragments (144 Da from dehydroalanyl-glycine) and for structural information of glutathione adducts. This approach was qualified using eight compounds known to form GSH conjugates as reported in the literature. The high sensitivity and specificity were demonstrated in identifying unique CysGly adducts in the case of clozapine, diclofenac, and raloxifene and in identifying GSH-adducts of fragmented parent molecules in the case of amodiaquine and troglitazone. In addition, LC-UV chromatograms in the presence or absence of GSH/GSX allowed for identification of the rearranged glutathione adducts without aforementioned characteristic fragment ions. Implement of this assay in drug discovery small molecule programs has successfully guided drug design.

Characterization of a highly sensitive and selective novel trapping reagent, stable isotope labeled glutathione ethyl ester, for the detection of reactive metabolites.

INTRODUCTION: Glutathione (GSH) trapping assays are widely used to predict the post-marketing risk for idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) in the pharmaceutical industry. Although several GSH derivatives have been introduced as trapping reagents for reactive intermediates, more sensitive and selective reagents are desired to prevent the generation of erroneous results. In this study, stable isotope labeled GSH ethyl ester (GSHEE-d5) was designed and its detection capability was evaluated. METHODS: GSHEE-d5 was synthesized and its detection potential was compared with stable isotope labeled GSH ([(13)C2,(15)N]GSH) as a reference trapping reagent. The trapping reagents were added to human liver microsomes as a 1:1 mixture with GSHEE or GSH, respectively, and incubated with seven IDR positive drugs and three IDR negative drugs. The adducts formed between the reagents and reactive metabolites were analyzed by unit resolution mass spectrometer (MS) using isotope pattern-dependent scan with neutral loss filtering. RESULTS: A single-step reaction of GSH and ethanol-d6 produced GSHEE-d5 with a yield of 85%. The GSHEE-d5 assay detected adducts with all seven IDR positive drugs, and no adducts were detected with the three IDR negative drugs. In contrast, the [(13)C2,(15)N]GSH assay failed to detect adducts with three of the IDR positive drugs. In the case of diclofenac, the GSHEE-d5 assay showed a 4-times greater signal intensity than the [(13)C2,(15)N]GSH assay. DISCUSSION: GSHEE-d5 enabled the detection of reactive metabolites with greater sensitivity and selectivity than [(13)C2,(15)N]GSH. These results demonstrate that GSHEE-d5 would be a useful trapping reagent for evaluating the risk of IDRs with unit resolution MS.