Percutaneous decannulation reduces procedure length and rates of groin wound infection in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Objective: Open decannulation from femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) carries high risk of morbidity, including groin wound infection. This study evaluated the impact of percutaneous decannulation on rates of groin wound infection in patients decannulated from femoral VA-ECMO. Methods: Between January 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023, 47 consecutive patients received percutaneous femoral VA-ECMO and survived to decannulation. A percutaneous suture-mediated closure device was used for decannulation in patients with relatively smaller arterial cannulas. Patients with larger arterial cannulas or unsuccessful percutaneous closures underwent surgical cutdown and repair of the femoral artery. The primary outcome was arterial site wound infection following decannulation. Results: Among the 47 patients who survived to decannulation from VA-ECMO, 21 underwent percutaneous decannulation and 27 underwent surgical cutdown. One patient underwent 2 VA-ECMO runs, one with percutaneous decannulation and one with surgical cutdown. Percutaneous decannulation was attempted in 22 patients, with 21 of 22 (95.5%) success rate. Decannulation procedure length was significantly shorter in the percutaneous group (79 minutes vs 148 minutes, P = .0001). The percutaneous group had significantly reduced rates of groin wound complications (0% vs 40.7%, P = .001) and groin wound infections (0% vs 22.2%, P = .03) when compared with the surgical cutdown group. Three patients (14.3%) in the percutaneous group experienced vascular complications, including pseudoaneurysm at the distal perfusion catheter site and nonocclusive thrombus of the common femoral artery. Conclusions: Percutaneous decannulation may reduce decannulation procedure length and rate of groin wound infection in patients who survive to decannulation from VA-ECMO.

Impact of haemoglobin A1c on wound infection in patients with diabetes with implanted synthetic graft.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values and operative wound infection. METHOD: During the period from 2013-2016, consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes were prospectively evaluated. Data were retrospectively analysed. All included patients were admitted for an elective surgical procedure, requiring the use of prosthetic graft in a groin wound. The patients were divided into two groups according to their preoperative HbA1c values. The main outcome was groin wound infection. The association between preoperative long-term glycoregulation and wound infection was evaluated, as well as the impact of postoperative glycaemic values, regardless of the level of HbA1c. RESULTS: Of the 93 participating patients, wound infection occurred in 20 (21.5%). Wound infection occurred in 28.2% of patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >7%) and 16.7% of patients with controlled diabetes (HbA1c <7%); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.181). In regression modelling, operative time (p=0.042) was a significant predictor of wound infection, while patients' age (p=0.056) was on the borderline of statistical significance. Females had a higher probability for wound infection (odds ratio (OR): 1.739; 95% confidence interval (CI):0.483-6.265), but there was no statistical significance (p=0.397). Patients with elevated levels of HbA1c had a higher chance of wound infection compared with patients with controlled diabetes (OR: 2.243; 95% CI: 0.749-6.716), nevertheless, this was not statistically significant (p=0.149). CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant correlation between elevated values of preoperative HbA1c and postoperative groin wound infection.

Viability of the rectus femoris muscle flap for groin wound coverage after ligation of proximal inflow.

Lower extremity revascularization via groin incisions can be complicated by wound dehiscence associated with infection, seroma and femoral vessel exposure. This may require additional surgical debridement and coverage of vascular structures and grafts. The pedicled rectus femoris muscle flap (RFF) has both bulk and a large arc of rotation, making it useful for reconstruction. Its main pedicle is the descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery (DLFCA), a branch of the profunda femoris artery. One could anticipate that ligation of more proximal vasculature could lead to ischemia of the RFF. We present two patients who each underwent vascular surgery involving the common femoral artery and subsequent reconstruction utilizing a pedicled RFF. Both patients then required additional vascular procedures involving the ligation of inflow vessels proximal to the DLFCA. The flaps remained viable, demonstrating the rich collateralization of blood supply that occurs in vascular disease patients.

Use of Muscle Flaps for Salvage of Groin Wound Infection Following Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Groin wound infections in vascular surgery are still a common complication and challenging problem. This systematic review aimed to establish a complete view of patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for infected groin wounds following vascular surgery reconstruction using muscle flaps and to evaluate the differences in outcomes between the sartorius muscle flap (SMF), rectus femoris muscle flap (RFF), and gracilis muscle flap (GMF). METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to April 2021. Random-effects meta-analysis for comorbidities and outcomes and subgroup analyses for outcomes were performed. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included in qualitative and quantitative syntheses. Overall pooled data showed the following outcome rates: 4.5% muscle flap necrosis (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.4-12.3%; I2 = 0%), 21.8% overall complications (95% CI, 15.8-27.7%; I2 = 0%), 8.0% limb loss (95% CI, 1.9-14.1%; I2 = 0%), 15.4% graft loss (95% CI, 5.0-25.3%; I2 = 37.9%), and 7.4% 30-day mortality (95% CI, -.9-15.6%; I2 = 0%). The rates of overall complications were 20.3% (95% CI, 12.1-28.2%; I2 = 0%), 23.2% (95% CI, 11.2-34.5%; I2 = 10.2%), and 18.0% (95% CI, -3.537.8%; I2 = 0%) for the SMF, RFF, and GMF, respectively. The rate of limb loss was highest for the GMF (17.2%; 95% CI, -4.237.2%; I2 = 0%). The rate of graft loss for the RFF was the highest (20.7%; 95% CI, .6-39.1%; I2 = 53.9%). The rate of 30-day mortality was the lowest for the SMF (5.3%; 95% CI, -6.1-16.6%; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and safety of muscle flap reconstruction for infected groin wounds following vascular surgery are clearly positive. This review indicated a tendency for lower complication rates with the SMF than with other muscle flaps.

Groin Wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) Risk Prediction Models: Development, Internal Validation, and Comparison with Existing Risk Prediction Models Identified in a Systematic Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and internally validate risk prediction models for predicting groin wound surgical site infections (SSIs) following arterial intervention and to evaluate the utility of existing risk prediction models for this outcome. METHODS: Data from the Groin wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) multicentre cohort study were used. The GIVE study prospectively enrolled 1 039 consecutive patients undergoing an arterial procedure through 1 339 groin incisions. An overall SSI rate of 8.6% per groin incision, and a deep/organ space SSI rate of 3.8%, were reported. Eight independent predictors of all SSIs, and four independent predictors of deep/organ space SSIs were included in the development and internal validation of two risk prediction models. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify relevant risk prediction models for their evaluation. RESULTS: The "GIVE SSI risk prediction model" ("GIVE SSI model") and the "GIVE deep/organ space SSI risk prediction model" ("deep SSI model") had adequate discrimination (C statistic 0.735 and 0.720, respectively). Three other groin incision SSI risk prediction models were identified; both GIVE risk prediction models significantly outperformed these other risk models in this cohort (C statistic 0.618 - 0.629; p < .050 for inferior discrimination in all cases). CONCLUSION: Two models were created and internally validated that performed acceptably in predicting "all" and "deep" groin SSIs, outperforming current existing risk prediction models in this cohort. Future studies should aim to externally validate the GIVE models.

A multicenter, prospective randomized trial of negative pressure wound therapy for infrainguinal revascularization with a groin incision.

BACKGROUND: Wound complications after open infrainguinal revascularization are a frequent cause of patient morbidity, resulting in increased healthcare costs. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) on groin wound complications after infrainguinal bypass and femoral endarterectomy. METHODS: A total of 242 patients who had undergone infrainguinal bypass (n = 124) or femoral endarterectomy (n = 118) at five academic medical centers in New England from April 2015 to August 2019 were randomized to ciNPT (PREVENA; 3M KCI, St Paul, Minn; n = 118) or standard gauze (n = 124). The primary outcome measure was a composite endpoint of groin wound complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs), major noninfectious wound complications, or graft infections within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcome measures included 30-day SSIs, 30-day noninfectious wound complications, readmission for wound complications, significant adverse events, and health-related quality of life using the EuroQoL 5D-3L survey. RESULTS: The ciNPT and control groups had similar demographics (age, 67 vs 67 years, P = .98; male gender, 71% vs 70%, P = .86; white race, 93% vs 93%, P = .97), comorbidities (previous or current smoking, 93% vs 94%, P = .46; diabetes, 41% vs 48%, P = .20; renal insufficiency, 4% vs 7%, P = .31), and operative characteristics, including procedure type, autogenous conduit, and operative time. No differences were found in the primary composite outcome at 30 days between the two groups (ciNPT vs control: 31% vs 28%; P = .55). The incidence of SSI at 30 days was similar between the two groups (ciNPT vs control: 11% vs 12%; P = .58). Infectious (13.9% vs 12.6%; P = .77) and noninfectious (20.9% vs 17.6%; P = .53) wound complications at 30 days were also similar for the ciNPT and control groups. Wound complications requiring readmission also similar between the two groups (ciNPT vs control: 9% vs 7%; P = .54). The significant adverse event rates were not different between the two groups (ciNPT vs control: 13% vs 16%; P = .53). The mean length of the initial hospitalization was the same for the ciNPT and control groups (5.2 vs 5.7 days; P = .63). The overall health-related quality of life was similar at baseline and at 14 and 30 days postoperatively for the two groups. Although not powered for stratification, we found no differences among the subgroups in gender, obesity, diabetes, smoking, claudication, chronic limb threatening ischemia, bypass, or endarterectomy. On multivariable analysis, no differences were found in wound complications at 30 days for the ciNPT vs gauze groups (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.6; P = .234). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other randomized studies, our multicenter trial of infrainguinal revascularization found no differences in the 30-day groin wound complications for patients treated with ciNPT vs standard gauze dressings. However, the SSI rate was lower in the control group than reported in other studies, suggesting other practice patterns and processes of care might have reduced the rate of groin infections. Further study might identify the subsets of high-risk patients that could benefit from ciNPT.

Contemporary management and outcomes of complex vascular surgical groin wound infections.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgical groin wound infection (VS-GWI) has multiple causes and frequently is manifested as a limb- or life-threatening problem, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. For patients undergoing operative extirpation, in situ repair, extra-anatomic bypass, or ligation can be used; however, limited data exist describing comparative results of the different operative choices or conduit subtypes. Therefore, we sought to describe our experience with management of VS-GWI and to detail outcomes of the different strategies. METHODS: Patients (2003-2017) undergoing surgical treatment of VS-GWI (Szilagyi grade III) secondary to primary infectious arteritis or infected pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous intervention as well as previous prosthetic graft placement were reviewed. The primary end point was major adverse limb events (MALEs; major amputation, graft occlusion, or unplanned reintervention). Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, wound healing, amputation-free survival (AFS), and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine relative risk of end points; Kaplan-Meier methodology was employed to estimate freedom from outcomes. RESULTS: There were 149 patients (age, 65 ± 11 years; body mass index, 27 ± 6 kg/m2; 70% male; 32% diabetes) identified, of whom 120 (81%) had unilateral and 29 (19%) had bilateral VS-GWI. Indications included infected prosthetic bypass (88% [n = 131]; infrainguinal, 107; suprainguinal, 24) and primary infectious femoral artery complications (12% [n = 18]). A majority underwent single-stage operations (87% [n = 129]). In situ reconstruction occurred in 87% (n = 129); 9% (n = 13) underwent ligation, and 6% (n = 7) received extra-anatomic revascularization. Autogenous conduit was used most commonly (68% [n = 101/149]; 88% single stage), of which 81% (n = 80) were femoral vein. The remaining patients received cadaveric (15% [n = 23]; 87% single stage) or prosthetic (8% [n=12]; 67% single stage) grafts. Adjunctive myocutaneous flap was used in 37% (n = 54). Length of stay was 19 ± 15 days and 30-day mortality was 7% (n = 10), with no difference between conduit repair types. All femoral wounds healed (mean follow-up, 17 ± 11 months); however, 33% (n = 49) underwent reoperation (unplanned graft reintervention, 33%; graft occlusion, 16%; wound débridement, 15%; major amputation, 11%). Reinfection occurred in 17% (n = 27), with no difference between groups. MALE rate was 22% (n = 33; most were arterial reinterventions, 19%), with no difference in single-stage vs multistage, in situ vs extra-anatomic, or autogenous vs nonautogenous conduit strategies Predictors of MALE included younger age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6 per decade; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.5; P = .02) and lower body mass index (<25 kg/m2; HR, 1.6 per BMI category; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .02). Overall, 1- and 3-year freedom from MALE, AFS, and survival were as follows: MALE, 74% ± 5% and 63% ± 6%; AFS, 68% ± 4% and 58% ± 5%; survival, 78% ± 3% and 70% ± 4%. Autogenous conduit use was associated with better survival (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; 1-year: 83% ± 4% vs nonautogenous, 78% ± 4%; 3-year: 68% ± 8% vs 53% ± 9%; log-rank, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: An individualized approach to operative strategy and conduit choice leads to comparable outcomes in this challenging group of patients. VS-GWI can be safely managed with in situ, autogenous reconstruction in a majority of patients with acceptable mortality, excellent wound healing rates, and improved overall survival. However, a significant proportion of patients experience reinfection and MALEs, the preponderance of which are arterial reintervention, mandating need for close follow-up and graft surveillance.

Outcome of rectus femoris muscle flaps for groin coverage after vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the outcome of rectus femoris muscle flaps (RFFs) for deep groin wound complications in vascular surgery patients and to compare the outcome with a cohort of sartorius muscle flaps (SMFs) because the RFF is a promising alternative technique for groin coverage. METHODS: All RFFs and SMFs performed by vascular surgeons in a regional collaboration in The Southern Netherlands were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes were muscle flap survival, overall and secondary graft salvage, and limb salvage. Secondary outcomes were 30-day groin wound complications and mortality, donor site and vascular complications, 1-year amputation-free survival, overall patient survival, impaired knee extensor function, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 96 RFFs were performed in 88 patients (mean age, 68 years; 67% male) and compared with a cohort of 30 SMFs in 28 patients (mean age, 64 years; 77% male). At a mean follow-up of 29 months and 23 months, respectively, comparable flap survival (94% vs 90%), secondary graft salvage (80% vs 92%), and limb salvage (89% vs 90%) rates were found. The 30-day mortality rates were 12% and 17%, respectively, and the 1-year amputation-free survival was comparable between treatment groups (71% vs 68%). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a large series of RFFs for deep groin wound complications after vascular surgery. We demonstrate that muscle flap coverage using the rectus femoris muscle by vascular surgeons is an effective way to manage complex groin wound infections in a challenging group of patients, achieving similarly good results as the SMF.

[Thigh muscle flaps for postoperative inguinal wound complications in vascular surgery : Sartorius muscle versus rectus femoris muscle]. / Oberschenkelmuskellappen bei inguinalen postoperativen Komplikationen in der Gefäßchirurgie : Musculus sartorius vs. Musculus rectus femoris.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal wound complications often cause postoperative morbidity and also mortality following vascular surgical interventions. The aim of this study was to report experiences and a comparison of the outcomes using rectus femoris muscle flaps (RFF) and sartorius muscle flaps (SMF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at two locations of a cross-border vascular center and all muscle flap interventions performed at the two centers within the vascular surgery department were reviewed. Primary outcomes were muscle flap survival, graft salvage and major amputations. RESULTS: A total of 44 RFFs were performed in 39 patients (mean age 67 years, 73% males) and 25 SMFs in 24 patients (mean age 64 years, 76% males). Wound infections were the most common indications for muscle flap reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 24 months (±24) and 17 months (±20), respectively, comparable flap survival rates (91% vs. 84%), wound healing rates (72% vs. 83%), graft salvage (65% vs. 73%) and amputation rates (9% vs. 8%) were found. CONCLUSION: Muscle flap reconstruction is an effective way to cover groin defects resulting from deep wound infections after vascular surgery, achieving good results in a high-risk group of patients. No differences were found between SMF and RFF regarding amputation and graft loss. Both techniques can be safely performed, depending on the preference and experience of the surgical team. The RFF technique should be preferentially used to cover large tissue defects, whereas the SMF procedure can be preferred to cover smaller defects in the groin.

A systematic review on the use of muscle flaps for deep groin infection following vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to assess potential differences in effectiveness (graft loss and limb loss) between the sartorius muscle flap (SMF) and the rectus femoris muscle flap (RFF) coverage technique for deep groin wound infection following vascular surgery. Our hypothesis was that RFF reconstruction is more effective in groin coverage. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases were systematically searched by two independent researchers for articles reporting effectiveness of both muscle flaps in the treatment of groin infections following vascular surgery. After quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Methodological Index for NOn-Randomized studies (MINOR) scores and data extraction, individual results of the included studies were reviewed. Weighted pooled outcome estimates were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies comprising 544 SMF reconstructions and 238 RFF reconstructions were included. The pooled flap survival rate was 100% in both groups, with a pooled amputation rate of 0% and 2%, respectively. In the RFF group, a pooled 30-day mortality rate of 0% was found, compared with 1% in the SMF group. Pooled graft loss rates were 2% in the RFF group and 21% in the SMF group. Only one head-to-head comparison between both muscle flaps was performed, finding no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Deep groin infection after vascular surgery can be treated with debridement and local muscle flap coverage. In this systematic review, superiority of either muscle flap on amputation or mortality rates was not demonstrated; however, there was a lower rate of vascular graft loss after RFF reconstruction. These conclusions are based on low-quality evidence because of limited data. Local muscle flap reconstruction using both techniques is effective in the treatment of infected groin wounds, achieving good results in a fragile group of patients. Therefore, anatomical and patient characteristics, which were not assessed in this analysis, are critical in the decision-making process on which muscle flap reconstruction is the best treatment option for an individual patient.

Study protocol for the groin wound infection after vascular exposure (GIVE) audit and multicentre cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) following groin incision for arterial exposure are commonplace and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following major arterial surgery. Published incidence varies considerably. The primary aim of GIVE will be to compare individual units' practice with established guidelines from The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Secondary aims will be to describe the contemporary rate of SSI in patients undergoing groin incision for arterial exposure, to identify risk factors for groin wound infection, to examine the value of published tools in the prediction of SSI, to identify areas of equipoise which could be examined in future efficacy/effectiveness trials and to compare UK SSI rates with international centres. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international, multicentre, prospective observational study will be delivered via the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (VERN). Participating centres will identify all patients undergoing clean emergency or elective groin incision(s) for arterial intervention during a consecutive 3-month period. Follow up data will be captured at 90 days after surgery. SSIs will be defined according to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. Data will be gathered centrally using an anonymised electronic data collection tool or secure email transfer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be registered as a clinical audit at all participating UK centres; research ethics approval is not required. National leads will oversee the appropriate registration and approvals in countries outside the UK as required. Site specific reports of SSI rates will be provided to each participating centre. Study results will be disseminated locally at each site, publicised on social media and submitted for peer-reviewed publication.

Intra-Dermal Absorbable Suture in the Groin Incision Associated with Less Groin Surgical Site Infections than Trans-Dermal Sutures in Vascular Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: The groin surgical site is frequently infected in vascular surgical procedures. Our aim was to evaluate the relation of skin closure methods and groin incision infection after vascular operations involving femoral artery exposure. METHODS: In this retrospective patient record study, patient files of all consecutive patients admitted for a vascular procedure to the Turku University Hospital Department of Vascular Surgery during 2015-2016 were evaluated. Patients with an isolated groin surgical site because of femoral artery exposure (256) were included in the study. Patient demographics, details of the operations, and follow-up data were collected from the electronic patient data record. Statistical analyses were performed using a multi-variable model. RESULTS: Altogether, 330 groin incisions were performed for 256 patients. Of all incisions, 262 (79.4%) were closed using intra-dermal absorbable suture; trans-dermal sutures were used in 68 (20.6%) incisions. Groin infections occurred in 24 (9.2%) patients after skin closure with intra-dermal absorbable suture and in 17 (25.0%) cases after trans-dermal sutures. Incisions that were closed using trans-dermal sutures were 3.5 times as likely to have an infection as those closed using intra-dermal sutures (odds ratio 3.5, confidence interval 95% 1.6 to 7.6, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Present data suggest that groin incision closure with intra-dermal absorbable suture is associated with groin incision infections compared with those incisions closed with trans-dermal sutures.

Closed-incision negative pressure therapy to reduce groin wound infections in vascular surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Groin wound infections pose a major problem in vascular surgery. Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) was especially designed for the management of incisions at risk of surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ciNPT is able to reduce the incidence of wound infections after vascular surgery. Data on 132 consecutive patients, scheduled for vascular surgery with a longitudinal femoral cutdown, were collected prospectively. All patients were randomised either to the ciNPT group (n = 64) or the control group (n = 68) with conventional dressing. In the ciNPT group, the foam dressing was applied intraoperatively and removed after 5 days. The control group received an absorbent dressing. All wounds were evaluated after 5 and 42 days. Infections were graded according the Szilagyi classification (I-III°). There were no significant differences between both groups considering patient characteristics. Indications for surgery were peripheral arterial disease in 95% (125/132) and aneurysm in 5% (7/132). The overall infection rates were 14% (9/64) in the ciNPT group and 28% (19/68) in the control group (P = 0·055). Early infections were observed in 6% (4/64) of the ciNPT group and 15% (10/68) of the control group (P = 0·125). ciNPT did not reduce infection rates associated with different risk factors for infection. While the experiences with the ciNPT device were encouraging, the study fails to provide evidence of the efficacy of the device to reduce groin wound infections after vascular surgery. It illustrates far more that larger multicentre studies are required and appear promising to provide further evidence for the use of ciNPT.

Routine use of PICO dressings may reduce overall groin wound complication rates following peripheral vascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 19% of morbidity in peripheral vascular surgery is attributable to wound complications, which can result in delayed healing, and also arterial or graft infection leading to limb loss and even mortality in extreme cases. AIM: To determine whether groin wound complications were reduced following the routine introduction of PICO negative pressure wound therapy dressings in patients who underwent peripheral vascular surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent peripheral vascular surgery from 2011 to 2016 were identified and divided into PICO and non-PICO groups. Patient, procedure and wound characteristics were tabulated and analysed. Patients were followed-up for at least six weeks postoperatively. Wound complication rates, infection confirmed by microbiology, and requirement for re-admission due to wound complications were noted. Basic cost analysis was performed. FINDINGS: In total, 151 patients were analysed (N = 73 PICO, N = 78 non-PICO). No difference in age (P = 0.862), body mass index (P = 0.673), diabetes (P = 0.339), pre-operative albumin (P = 0.196), use of drain (P = 0.343) and history of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.281) was observed between groups. The PICO group contained more smokers than the non-PICO group (45% vs 29%, P = 0.034). Wound complications were seen in 8% (N = 6) of the PICO group and 19% (N = 15) of the non-PICO group (P = 0.042). No significant difference in infection was found between the two groups (3% vs 6%, P = 0.249), but fewer seromas were observed when PICO dressings were used (1.4% vs 7.7%, P = 0.069). Haematoma (2.7% vs 3.8%, P = 0.531) and dehiscence rates (1.4% vs 1.3%, P = 0.735) were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of PICO dressings is associated with a reduction in wound complication rates following peripheral vascular surgery, and is cost-effective.

Bilateral groin reconstruction with a single anterolateral thigh perforator flap as an alternative to traditional myocutaneous flaps.

•We describe bilateral groin reconstruction with a single anterolateral thigh flap.•Anatomy and surgical technique of the anterolateral thigh flap are discussed.

Outcome analysis of 244 consecutive flaps for managing complex groin wounds.

BACKGROUND: Complex groin wounds present a significant challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. We present a large experience of flaps for managing complex groin wounds. The purpose of our study was to assess outcomes with respect to flap selection and indication (prophylactic versus salvage). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients receiving flaps for complex groin wounds between 2005 and 2011 was performed. Two types of procedures were evaluated: prophylactic muscle flaps (PMFs) and salvage flaps. We performed an outcome analysis of complications based on flap timing and selection. RESULTS: A total of 244 flaps were performed during the study period: 146 flaps for salvage and 98 for prophylaxis. Flaps included: sartorius muscle flap (SMF) (N=132), rectus femoris flap (RFF) (N=99), and antero-lateral thigh (ALT) (N=13). Salvaged wounds had higher rates of major wound dehiscence compared to prophylactic wounds (P=0.002). The SMF (N=132) and RFF (N=99) cohorts were similar with respect to patient and operative characteristics, however, the RFF cohort tended to be obese (P=0.002), used for salvage (P=0.0005), endarterectomy procedures (P=0.018), and culture positive wounds (P=0.09). Major limb related complications (graft loss, limb loss, and reoperation) were significantly lower in the RFF group (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Muscle flaps for complex groin wounds can be safely performed with excellent outcomes. We suggest use of the SMF in the prophylactic setting and for smaller salvage wounds. The RFF may be better suited to address larger, more complex wounds. PMFs in select, high-risk patients optimize wound healing relative to patients undergoing groin wound salvage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/risk category, level III.