Neonatal/perinatal diagnosis of hemolysis using ETCOc.

Hemolysis is a pathological shortening of the red blood cell lifespan. When hemolysis occurs in a neonate, hazardous hyperbilirubinemia and severe anemia could result. Hemolysis can be diagnosed, and its severity quantified, by the non-invasive measurement of carbon monoxide (CO) in exhaled breath. The point-of-care measurement is called "End-tidal CO corrected for ambient CO" (ETCOc). Herein we explain how ETCOc measurements can be used to diagnose and manage various perinatal/neonatal hemolytic disorders. We provide information regarding five clinical situations; 1) facilitating a precise diagnosis among neonates presenting with anemia or jaundice of unknown etiology, 2) monitoring fetal hemolysis with serial measurements of mothers during pregnancy, 3) measuring the duration of hemolysis in neonates with hemolytic disease, 4) measuring neonates who require phototherapy, to determine whether they have hemolytic vs. non-hemolytic jaundice, and 5) measuring all neonates in the birth hospital as part of a jaundice-detection and management program.

A challenging case of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-Ku in a K0 (Kellnull) mother.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to an antibody in the Kell blood group system can be associated with severe fetal anemia. This case report details the challenges of managing a Kellnull mother with anti-Ku that affected her fetus/newborn. A gravida 4 para 3 woman at term underwent an emergency lower caesarean section because of fetal distress. The baby was intubated because of low oxygen saturation. An urgent request for a hematology workup showed severe anemia and erythroblastosis fetalis. Unfortunately, no compatible blood was found, and the baby died. The case was referred to the National Blood Centre, and anti-Ku was confirmed in a sample sent from the mother. When she presented with her fifth pregnancy, meticulous planning was used to manage this pregnancy. Her family screening revealed one brother with a matching phenotype. Three blood donations were planned for the brother-for freezing, for intrauterine transfusion, and for standby during delivery. Serial anti-Ku titrations of maternal samples were performed, and the fetus was monitored for anemia through middle cerebral artery Doppler scans. Although the anti-Ku titers reached as high as 1024, fetal anemia was never diagnosed. The neonate was delivered safely but was diagnosed with severe pathologic jaundice and anemia secondary to HDFN and congenital pneumonia. The baby was transfused with K0 packed red blood cells and later discharged to home.

Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Caused by Maternal Alloanti-Fy(a).

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is commonly attributed to maternal antibodies against fetal red blood cell antigens, with anti-D being the most frequent cause. However, other antibodies, such as anti-Fya from the Duffy blood group system, can also lead to HDFN, although they are less commonly reported. This case study describes a 29-year-old woman at 38+1 weeks of gestation, with a history of multiple pregnancies and a planned elective lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS). During pre-operative testing, her blood cross-matching results were incompatible, prompting further investigation, which revealed the presence of anti-Fya antibodies. The neonate was delivered with an APGAR (appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration) score of 8/10 and 9/10 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively, and initially exhibited no signs of severe fetal distress. However, elevated bilirubin levels were observed shortly after birth, necessitating double surface phototherapy. This case shows the clinical significance of anti-Fya in HDFN. It highlights the critical role of comprehensive antenatal antibody screening for all pregnant women, to detect potentially significant alloantibodies early and guide appropriate management to mitigate the risks associated with HDFN.

Management and Treatment Outcomes of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn (HDFN)-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is caused by maternal antibodies attacking fetal blood cell antigens. Despite routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) are still needed in some HDFN cases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on newborns with HDFN born in the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Warsaw. We analyzed 274 neonates with HDFN, identifying 46 who required IUT due to fetal anemia and 228 who did not. The laboratory results, management, and outcomes were compared between these groups. Results: Comparative analysis showed that newborns treated with IUT were more likely to have significant anemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and iron overload, indicated by a high ferritin concentration. These neonates more often required top-up transfusions, phototherapy, intravenous immunoglobulin infusions, and exchange transfusions. The length of stay was longer for newborns who received IUT. Conclusions: HDFN requiring IUT is associated with a greater number of complications in the neonatal period and more often requires additional treatment compared to HDFN not requiring IUT.

Comparison of the Detection Rate and Specificity of Irregular Red Blood Cell Antibodies Between First-Time Pregnant Women and Women With a History of Multiple Pregnancies Among 18,010 Chinese Women.

Background: There is insufficient evidence to assess the risk of the production of clinically important alloimmune irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies in first-time pregnant women. Methods: Using the microcolumn gel antiglobulin method, 18,010 Chinese women with a history of pregnancy and pregnant women were screened for irregular RBC antibodies, and for those with positive test results, antibody specificity was determined. The detection rate and specificity of irregular RBC antibodies in women with a history of multiple pregnancies (two or more) and first-time pregnant women were determined. Results: In addition to 25 patients who passively acquired anti-D antibodies via an intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin injection, irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 121 (0.67%) of the 18,010 women. Irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 93 (0.71%) of the 13,027 women with a history of multiple pregnancies, and antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the Rh, MNSs, Lewis, and Kidd blood group systems; irregular RBC antibodies were detected in 28 (0.56%) of the 4983 first-time pregnant women, and the antibody specificity was distributed mainly in the MNSs, Rh, and Lewis blood group systems. The difference in the percentage of patients with irregular RBC antibodies between the two groups was insignificant (χ 2 = 1.248, P > 0.05). Of the 121 women with irregular RBC antibodies, nine had anti-Mur antibodies, and one had anti-Dia antibodies; these antibodies are clinically important but easily missed because the antigenic profile of the reagent RBCs that are commonly used in antibody screens does not include the antigens that are recognized by these antibodies. Conclusion: Irregular RBC antibody detection is clinically important for both pregnant women with a history of multiple pregnancies and first-time pregnant women. Mur and Dia should be included in the antigenic profile of reagent RBCs that are used for performing antibody screens in the Chinese population.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Cholestasis in Newborns with Hemolytic Disease-A Case-Control Study.

Background/Objectives: One of the rare causes of cholestasis may be hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 88 medical records of HDFN newborns with cholestasis and 186 records of children with HDFN without cholestasis and conducted an observational, case-control, retrospective study. Results: Factors influencing the risk of cholestasis were lower gestational age at birth (36.83 ± 1.9 vs. 37.57 ± 1.8, p = 0.002), Rh or Kidd HDFN (80.7% vs. 53.2%), and the need for intrauterine transfusion (27.3 vs. 11.8%). The subjects had lower hemoglobin concentrations at birth (14.01 ± 3.8 vs. 16.39 ± 2.8 g/dL) and during whole hospital stay, higher cord blood total bilirubin concentration (4.26 ± 1.8 vs. 2.39 ± 1.4 mg/dL), higher maximum bilirubin concentration (15.27 ± 5.8 vs. 10.24 ± 3.4 mg/dL), and more frequent liver ultrasound abnormalities (19.9 vs. 6.3%). They also required more extended hospitalization due to higher rates of postnatal blood transfusion (33 vs. 3.8%), more frequent need for exchange transfusion (8.8% vs. 2.2%), more extended time and higher risk of phototherapy (94.3 vs. 59.1%), and higher usage of immunoglobulins (55.7 vs. 8.1%), parenteral nutrition (45.5 vs. 12.9%), and antibiotics (14.8 vs. 4.8%). Conclusions: The risk factors for cholestasis in children with HDFN are lower gestational age at delivery, Rh and Kidd serological type of HDFN, and the need for intrauterine transfusions.

Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization in Pregnancy: A Review of the Pathophysiology, Prevalence, and Risk Factors.

This review paper provides an overview of the risk factors and laboratory testing for red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization in pregnancy. RBC alloimmunization is a significant medical issue that can cause haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), leading to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Current HDFN prophylaxis targets only Rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunization, with no effective measures to prevent alloimmunization to other RBC antigen groups. Several factors can increase the risk of developing RBC alloimmunization during pregnancy, including fetomaternal haemorrhage, RBC and maternal genetic status, and previous transfusions. Identifying these risk factors is essential to execute the appropriate management strategies to minimize the risk of HDFN. The review also discusses the laboratory methods and overview of pregnancy management. The paper highlights the importance of identifying and managing the risk factors for RBC alloimmunization in pregnancy to minimize the risk of HDFN and improve neonatal outcomes.

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women.

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Receipt of RhD-positive whole blood for life-threatening bleeding in female children: A survey in alloimmunized mothers regarding minimum acceptable survival benefit relative to risk of maternal alloimmunization to anti-D.

BACKGROUND: Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for treatment of hemorrhagic shock sometimes necessitates transfusion of RhD-positive units due to short supply of RhD-negative LTOWB. Practitioners must choose between using RhD-positive LTOWB when RhD-negative is unavailable against the risk to a female of childbearing potential of becoming RhD-alloimmunized, risking hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in future children, or using component therapy with RhD-negative red cells. This survey asked females with a history of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization about their risk tolerance of RhD alloimmunization compared to the potential for improved survival following transfusion of RhD-positive blood for an injured RhD negative female child. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey was administered to RBC alloimmunized mothers. Respondents were eligible if they were living in the United States with at least one red cell antibody known to cause HDFN and if they had at least one RBC alloimmunized pregnancy. RESULTS: Responses from 107 RBC alloimmmunized females were analyzed. There were 32/107 (30%) with a history of severe HDFN; 12/107 (11%) had a history of fetal or neonatal loss due to HDFN. The median (interquartile range) absolute improvement in survival at which the respondents would accept RhD-positive transfusions for a female child was 4% (1%-14%). This was not different between females with and without a history of severe or fatal HDFN (p = .08 and 0.38, respectively). CONCLUSION: Alloimmunized mothers would accept the risk of D-alloimmunization in a RhD-negative female child for improved survival in cases of life-threatening bleeding.

Application of anti-D immunoglobulin in D-negative pregnant women in China.

This article summarizes the current situation of anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D-Ig) use in RhD-negative pregnant women at home and abroad. The article describes the concept, research and development history, and domestic and foreign applications of anti-D-Ig and points out that anti-D-Ig has not been widely used in China, mainly due to reasons such as unavailability in the domestic market and non-standard current application strategies. The article focuses on analyzing the genetic and immunological characteristics of RhD-negative populations in China. The main manifestations were that the total number of hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) relatively high and D variant type. In particular, there are more Asian-type DEL, the importance of clinical application of anti-D-Ig was pointed out, and its antibody-mediated immunosuppressive mechanism was analyzed, which mainly includes red blood cell clearance, epitope blocking/steric hindrance, and Fc γ R Ⅱ B receptor mediated B cell inhibition, anti-D-Ig glycosylation, etc.; clarify the testing strategies of RhD blood group that should be adopted in response to the negative initial screening of pregnant and postpartum women; this article elaborates on the necessity of using anti-D-Ig in RhD-negative mothers after miscarriage or miscarriage, as well as the limitations of its application both domestically and internationally. It also proposes a solution strategy for detecting RhD blood group incompatibility HDFN as early as possible, diagnosing it in a timely manner, and using anti-D-Ig for its prevention and treatment. If the DEL gene is defined as an Asian-type DEL, anti-D-Ig prophylaxis in women would be unnecessary. Finally, based on the specificity of RhD-negative individuals, the article looks forward to the application trend of anti-D-Ig in China. It also called for related drugs to be listed in China as soon as possible and included in medical insurance.

A novel pyrosequencing strategy for RHD zygosity for predicting risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the development of an accurate and quantitative pyrosequence (PSQ) method for paternal RHD zygosity detection to help risk management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). METHODS: Blood samples from 96 individuals were genotyped for RHD zygosity using pyrosequencing assay. To validate the accuracy of pyrosequencing results, all the samples were then detected by the mismatch polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) method and Sanger DNA sequencing. Serological tests were performed to assess RhD phenotypes. RESULTS: Serological results revealed that 36 cases were RhD-positive and 60 cases were RhD-negative. The concordance rate between pyrosequencing assay and mismatch PCR-SSP assay was 94.8% (91/96). There were 5 discordant results between pyrosequencing and the mismatch PCR-SSP assay. Sanger sequencing confirmed that the pyrosequencing assay correctly assigned zygosity for the 5 samples. CONCLUSION: This DNA pyrosequencing method accurately detect RHD zygosity and will help risk management of pregnancies that are at risk of HDFN.

Comparison of automated solid phase versus manual saline indirect antiglobulin test methodology for non-ABO antibody titration: Implications for perinatal antibody monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Accurate antibody titration is crucial in prenatal evaluations to identify patients who need clinical monitoring for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) causing fetal anemia. This study compares the established gold standard method of manual tube saline indirect antiglobulin testing (SIAT) with the newer automated solid phase (ASP) method of antibody titration and aims to establish the critical titer threshold for ASP that corresponds to the previously established SIAT critical threshold of ≥16 used in our laboratory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven prenatal and donor plasma samples with known antibodies were tested using both SIAT and ASP methodologies and results were compared. RESULTS: The study found that ASP titers were, on average, 1.33 dilutions higher than SIAT titers. The critical titer cutoff for ASP was determined to be ≥32, which is one tube higher than the SIAT cutoff of ≥16. DISCUSSION: The ASP method for antibody titration offers greater reproducibility and efficiency compared with manual SIAT titration. This study suggests that a titer cutoff of ≥32 is appropriate for most clinically significant antibodies using ASP. However, further research is needed to determine the comparability of ASP with SIAT in samples with multiple antibodies, anti-M antibodies, and other less common antibodies. Validation of the ASP titer cutoff against HDFN clinical outcomes is required before implementing this test for routine use in perinatal antibody titration.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: rapid review of postnatal care and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Advances in postnatal care for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) have occurred over the past decades, but little is known regarding the frequency of postnatal treatment and the clinical outcomes of affected neonates. Most studies reporting on HDFN originate from high-income countries or relatively large centers, but important differences between centers and countries may exist due to differences in prevalence and available treatment options. We therefore aimed to evaluate the postnatal treatment landscape and clinical outcomes in neonates with Rhesus factor D (Rh(D))- and/or K-mediated HDFN and to provide recommendations for future research. METHODS: We conducted a rapid literature review of case reports and series, observational retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and trials describing pregnancies or children affected by Rh(D)- or K-mediated HDFN published between 2005 and 2021. Information relevant to the treatment of HDFN and clinical outcomes was extracted. Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov and EMBASE were searched for relevant studies by two independent reviewers through title/abstract and full-text screening. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality of included studies. RESULTS: Forty-three studies reporting postnatal data were included. The median frequency of exchange transfusions was 6.0% [interquartile range (IQR): 0.0-20.0] in K-mediated HDFN and 26.5% [IQR: 18.0-42.9] in Rh(D)-mediated HDFN. The median use of simple red blood cell transfusions in K-mediated HDFN was 50.0% [IQR: 25.0-56.0] and 60.0% [IQR: 20.0-72.0] in Rh(D)-mediated HDFN. Large differences in transfusion rates were found between centers. Neonatal mortality amongst cases treated with intrauterine transfusion(s) was 1.2% [IQR: 0-4.4]. Guidelines and thresholds for exchange transfusions and simple RBC transfusions were reported in 50% of studies. CONCLUSION: Most included studies were from middle- to high-income countries. No studies with a higher level of evidence from centers in low-income countries were available. We noted a shortage and inconsistency in the reporting of relevant data and provide recommendations for future reports. Although large variations between studies was found and information was often missing, analysis showed that the postnatal burden of HDFN, including need for neonatal interventions, remains high. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021234940. Available from:  https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021234940 .

Fetal RHD Screening in RH1 Negative Pregnant Women: Experience in Switzerland.

RH1 incompatibility between mother and fetus can cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In Switzerland, fetal RHD genotyping from maternal blood has been recommended from gestational age 18 onwards since the year 2020. This facilitates tailored administration of RH immunoglobulin (RHIG) only to RH1 negative women carrying a RH1 positive fetus. Data from 30 months of noninvasive fetal RHD screening is presented. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 7192 plasma samples using a commercial kit, followed by an in-house qPCR to detect RHD exons 5 and 7, in addition to an amplification control. Valid results were obtained from 7072 samples, with 4515 (64%) fetuses typed RHD positive and 2556 (36%) fetuses being RHD negative. A total of 120 samples led to inconclusive results due to the presence of maternal or fetal RHD variants (46%), followed by women being serologically RH1 positive (37%), and technical issues (17%). One sample was typed false positive, possibly due to contamination. No false negative results were observed. We show that unnecessary administration of RHIG can be avoided for more than one third of RH1 negative pregnant women in Switzerland. This reduces the risks of exposure to a blood-derived product and conserves this limited resource to women in actual need.

Misclassification of RhD variants among pregnant women: a systematic review.

The D antigen of the Rh blood group is considered clinically significant due to its ability to cause hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn. This systematic review discusses the prevalence of RhD variants among pregnant women and the importance of including RhD genotyping for prenatal testing to detect RhD variants and prevent anti-D alloimmunization. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using scientific search engines, including PubMed and MEDLINE databases, with the keywords 'anti-D alloimmunization', 'RhD variant', and 'pregnant women.' The review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc version 20. A significance level of p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant for all two-tailed tests. The meta-analysis included four articles that met the inclusion criteria. The total prevalence of RhD positivity (RhD+) was 61% (95% CI:34%-85%). The prevalence ranged from 22% to 82%, indicating a high degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2=98.71%, p<0.0001). The overall prevalence of D variants was 15% (95% CI, 9%-23%) with a prevalence of 0.05% to 100%, showing a high degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2=99.89%, p<0.0001). Anti-D alloimmunization could occur in pregnant women with some types of RhD variants. All four studies focused on molecular testing of samples showing inconsistent or weak results with at least two anti-D antibodies using serological methods.

Passive transfer of alloantibodies through breast milk as a mediator of hemolytic anemia.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is characterized by destruction of fetal/neonatal red blood cells (RBCs) secondary to maternally derived antibodies, which are typically thought to be passively acquired via placental transfer. Few cases have examined the possibility of HDFN mediated by maternal antibodies passively transferred via breast milk. METHODS: We describe two cases of persistent HDFN in infants potentially mediated by passively acquired antibodies via maternal breast milk. We discuss supporting and refuting evidence that may account for this possibility and describe testing methodology illustrating how maternal alloantibodies can be detected in breast milk. RESULTS: In both cases, anti-D antibodies were detected in maternal breast milk. One patient experienced a significant decrease in anti-D plasma titer from 64 to 4 dilutions following 2 weeks of breastfeeding cessation. The other patient experienced a resolution of anemia without breastfeeding cessation. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of data regarding the lifespan of passively acquired RBC antibodies in neonatal circulation, with significant variation noted between passively acquired IgG based on studies utilizing intravenous immunoglobulin compared to studies of maternally-acquired antiviral IgG antibodies. While our data do not definitively implicate passive transfer of alloantibodies in breast milk as a mediator of HDFN, they do illustrate the need for further investigation into the mechanisms and kinetics of passively acquired antibodies in neonatal circulation.

Live birth prevalence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in the United States from 1996 to 2010.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is mediated by maternal alloantibodies, a consequence of immune sensitization during pregnancy with maternal-fetal incompatibility with ABO, Rhesus factor (Rh), and/or other red blood cell antigens. RhD, Kell, and other non-ABO alloantibodies are the primary cause of moderate to severe HDFN, whereas ABO HDFN is typically mild. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to Rh alloimmunization among newborns in the United States was last estimated to be 106 per 100,000 births in 1986. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to all alloantibodies was estimated to be 817 to 840 per 100,000 in Europe. There is a need for updated prevalence estimates in the United States and a better understanding of disease demographics, severity, and treatments. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the live birth prevalence of HDFN and the proportion of severe cases of HDFN in the United States, to describe the associated risk factors, and to compare the clinical outcomes and treatments among healthy newborns, newborns with HDFN, and newborns who are sick without HDFN using a nationally representative hospital discharge database. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we used data from the 1996 to 2010 National Hospital Discharge Survey to identify live births, defined by inpatient visits with the newborn flag, with and without a diagnosis of HDFN across 200 to 500 sampled hospitals (≥6 beds) per year. Patient and hospital characteristics, alloimmunization status, disease severity, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Frequencies and weighted percentages were calculated for all variables. Logistic regression was used to compare the characteristics between newborns with HDFN and other newborns using odds ratios. RESULTS: Of 480,245 live births identified, 9810 HDFN cases were recorded. When weighted to the United States population, this corresponded to a live birth prevalence of 1695 per 100,000 live births. Compared with other newborns, newborns with HDFN were more likely to be female, Black, living in the South (vs the Midwest or West), and treated at larger (>100 beds) and government-owned hospitals. ABO and Rh alloimmunization accounted for 78.1% and 4.3% of newborns with HDFN, respectively, whereas HDFN caused by other antigens, such as Kell and Duffy, accounted for 17.6% of the cases. Among newborns with HDFN, 22% received phototherapy, 1% received simple transfusions, and 0.5% received exchange transfusions or intravenous immunoglobulin. Newborns affected by HDFN caused by Rh alloimmunization were more likely to require medical interventions, including simple or exchange transfusions, and more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery. Overall, HDFN was associated with a longer hospital length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit when compared with healthy and other sick newborns, a higher rate of cesarean delivery, and a higher rate of nonroutine discharge than healthy newborns. CONCLUSION: Overall, the live birth prevalence of HDFN was higher than those previously reported, whereas Rh-induced HDFN live birth prevalence was similar to those previously reported. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to Rh alloimmunization decreased over time, likely because of continued Rh immune globulin prophylaxis. Treatment patterns for newborns with HDFN and the comparative clinical outcomes when compared with healthy newborns confirm the continued clinical needs of this population.

Anti-C causing severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a rare case report.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-D was severe and fatal before the development of RhD immune prophylaxis. Proper screening and universal administration of Rh immune globulin has decreased the incidence of HDFN to a great extent. Pregnancy, transfusion, and transplantation still increase the chances of other alloantibody formation and the potential for HDFN. Advanced methods for immunohematology investigation allow for the identification of alloantibodies causative for HDFN other than anti-D. Many antibodies have been reported to cause HDFN, but there is scant literature where isolated anti-C is responsible for HDFN. We present here a case of severe HDFN caused by anti-C leading to severe hydrops and death of the neonate despite three intrauterine transfusions and other measures.

Maternal Cold-Reacting Immunoglobulin G Anti-M of MNS Blood Group System Causing Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus.

Several cases of the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-M antibodies have been reported, in which almost all the HDFN-associated anti-M were warmly reacting. Here we report two cases of severe HDFN associated with cold-reacting IgG anti-M. In both cases, pregnancy was terminated, in weeks 33 and 23 respectively, due to a diagnosis of fetal growth retardation (FGR). To our knowledge, these are the most severe HDFN cases caused by cold-reacting IgG anti-M.

Serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity in antenatal testing and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: The BEST collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity (SRUS) in pregnancy is not clear based on available literature. The aim of this study is to determine if SRUS is associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from eight institutions over an 11-year study period (2010-2020), when available (5/8 sites). The outcome of the pregnancies with SRUS-no, mild, moderate, or severe HDFN-was determined. RESULTS: SRUS was demonstrated in 589 pregnancies. After excluding those with incomplete data, a total of 284 pregnancies were included in the primary HDFN outcome analysis. SRUS was detected in 124 (44%) pregnancies in isolation, and none were affected by HDFN. Of 41 pregnancies with SRUS and ABO incompatibility, 37 (90%) were unaffected, and 4 (10%) were associated with mild HDFN. Of 98 pregnancies with SRUS and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), 80 (81%) were unaffected, and 19 (19%) were associated with mild to severe HDFN. There was 1 case of mild HDFN and 1 case of severe HDFN in the 21 pregnancies with SRUS, ABO incompatibility, and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), and 19 (90%) were unaffected by HDFN. Among all patients with repeat testing, newly identified alloantibodies or other antibodies were identified in 63 of 212 (30%) patients. Although most were not clinically significant, on occasion SRUS preceded clinically significant antibody(s) associated with HDFN (3%, 5/188). CONCLUSION: The antenatal serologic finding of SRUS in isolation is not associated with HDFN but may precede clinically significant antibodies.