Comparative effectiveness of gonadotropins used for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in France: A real-world observational study from the French nationwide claims database (SNDS).

This comparative non-interventional study using data from the French National Health Database (Système National des Données de Santé) investigated real-world (cumulative) live birth outcomes following ovarian stimulation, leading to oocyte pickup with either originator recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) products (alfa or beta), r-hFSH alfa biosimilars, or urinaries including mainly HP-hMG (menotropins), and marginally u-hFSH-HP (urofollitropin). Using data from 245,534 stimulations (153,600 women), biosimilars resulted in a 19% lower live birth (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.86) and a 14% lower cumulative live birth (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.89); and urinaries resulted in a 7% lower live birth (adjusted OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96) and an 11% lower cumulative live birth (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87-0.91) versus originator r-hFSH alfa. Results were consistent across strata (age and ART strategy), sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching, and with r-hFSH alfa and beta as the reference group.

Added value of anti-Müllerian hormone serum concentration in assisted reproduction clinical practice using highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG).

INTRODUCTION: The individual response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) depends on several factors, including the initial dose of gonadotropin. In repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, the initial dose of gonadotropin is mainly established on the basis of the previous attempts' outcomes. Conversely, in naive patients, the ovarian response should be estimated using other criteria, such as the serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). However, in clinical practice, the initial gonadotropin dose is not systematically adapted to the AMH level, despite the known relationship between AMH and ovarian reserve. MATERIAL AND METHODS: French non-interventional, longitudinal, prospective, multicentre, cohort study that included infertile women who underwent COS with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG 600 IU/mL) during their first IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle. Data were collected prospectively during routine follow-up visits from COS initiation to 10-11 weeks after embryo transfer. RESULTS: Data from 235 of the 297 enrolled women were used for the study. Serum AMH level was negatively correlated with the initial and total HP-hMG doses (p<0.001), and positively correlated with the number of retrieved oocytes (p<0.007). Embryos were obtained for 94.0% of women, and fresh embryo transfer was performed in 72.8% of them. The clinical pregnancy rate was 28.5% after the first embryo transfer. CONCLUSION: Selecting the appropriate starting dose of gonadotropin is crucial to optimize the IVF/ICSI procedure. For the first attempt, the serum AMH level is a good biomarker to individualize treatment.

Interplay Between mTOR and Hippo Signaling in the Ovary: Clinical Choice Guidance Between Different Gonadotropin Preparations for Better IVF.

One of the most widely used types of assisted reproduction technology is the in vitro fertilization (IVF), in which women undergo controlled ovarian stimulation through the administration of the appropriate hormones to produce as many mature follicles, as possible. The most common hormone combination is the co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues with recombinant or urinary-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). In the last few years, scientists have begun to explore the effect that different gonadotropin preparations have on granulosa cells' maturation and apoptosis, aiming to identify new predictive markers of oocyte quality and successful fertilization. Two major pathways that control the ovarian development, as well as the oocyte-granulosa cell communication and the follicular growth, are the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and the Hippo signaling. The purpose of this article is to briefly review the current knowledge about the effects that the different gonadotropins, used for ovulation induction, may exert in the biology of granulosa cells, focusing on the importance of these two pathways, which are crucial for follicular maturation. We believe that a better understanding of the influence that the various ovarian stimulation protocols have on these critical molecular cascades will be invaluable in choosing the best approach for a given patient, thereby avoiding cancelled cycles, reducing frustration and potential treatment-related complications, and increasing the pregnancy rate. Moreover, individualizing the treatment plan will help clinicians to better coordinate assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs, discuss the specific options with the couples undergoing IVF, and alleviate stress, thus making the IVF experience easier.

Individualized ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, open label, exploratory study with a mixed protocol of follitropin delta and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile and the number of usable blastocysts on day 5 and on day 6 after treatment with an individualized dosing regimen of a follitropin delta and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) for controlled ovarian stimulation. DESIGN: Multicenter, open label, exploratory study. SETTING: Reproductive medicine clinics. PATIENT(S): A total of 110 patients (aged 18-40 years). INTERVENTION(S): Follitropin delta coadministered with HP-hMG, with follitropin delta dose fixed according to an established algorithm and HP-hMG dose at 75 IU when the follitropin delta starting dosage was <12 µg; 150 IU when follitropin delta dosage was 12 µg and weight <100 kg, and 225 IU when follitropin delta dosage was 12 µg and weight ≥100 kg (dosage adjustments confined to HP-hMG only). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean number of good-quality blastocysts obtained at day 5 and day 6 as well as the proportion of women with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). RESULT(S): A cohort study was compared with the follitropin delta group from the Evidence-based Stimulation Trial with Human Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Europe and Rest of World 1 (ESTHER-1) study. Even when stratified by age, a statistically significantly higher mean in the number of oocytes retrieved and number of good-quality blastocysts was observed in this study compared with the ESTHER-1 trial in which follitropin delta was used alone. The rate of patients triggered with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was statistically significantly higher in our Menopur and Rekovelle Combined Study (MARCS) cohort (43%) when compared with the rates reported in the follitropin delta cohort in the ESTHER-1 study (2.3%). Incidence of any grade of OHSS was 9.3% in the present study compared to 2.6% in follitropin delta group from ESTHER-1 trial. No cases of moderate or severe OHSS were observed in our study compared with 1.4% in the follitropin delta group of ESTHER-1. CONCLUSION(S): Optimizing the ovarian response during in vitro fertilization employing a mixed protocol of individualized dosing of follitropin delta and HP-hMG resulted in a statistically significant number of usable blastocysts on days 5 and 6 with an increased risk of mild OHSS, which did not require medical intervention or hospitalization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03483545.

A pilot study comparing corifollitropin alfa associated with hp-HMG versus high dose rFSH antagonist protocols for ovarian stimulation in poor responders.

Does corifollitropin alfa associated with hp-HMG protocol from the beginning of ovarian stimulation perform better than high dose rFSH alone for ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist in poor responders? This retrospective, monocentric, case-control pilot study was conducted in 65 poor responders (Bologna criteria) undergoing 2 consecutive IVF cycles. All patients underwent a first ovarian stimulation cycle with high dose rFSH (≥300 IU/day) alone in antagonist protocol, unfortunately leading to poor ovarian response and no pregnancy. The following cycle was performed with 150 µg of corifollitropin alfa associated with daily injections of hp-HMG from the beginning of the cycle. The primary outcome was the number of mature oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes were ovarian stimulation cancellation and embryo transfer rate per initiated cycle. The number of mature oocytes was not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, cycle cancellation rate was significantly lower and the proportion of cycles with embryo transfer was significantly higher with corifollitropin + hp-HMG protocol, leading to an encouraging clinical pregnancy rate of 24.1% per oocyte retrieval. This pilot study based on corifollitropin alfa associated with hp-HMG from the onset of stimulation appears to be promising for ovarian stimulation in poor responders.

HMG versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH in ovarian stimulation for IVF: does the source of LH preparation matter?

Studies on the role of LH supplementation in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technique use different sources of LH bioactivity-containing preparations, daily doses and modes of administration. This review aims to critically present the available evidence comparing the effect of the two commercially available LH preparations (human menopausal gonadotrophin [HMG] and recombinant FSH + recombinant LH) with different sources of intrinsic LH bioactivity (HCG versus LH, respectively) on ovarian stimulation characteristics and IVF cycle outcomes. A literature review was conducted for all relevant articles reporting on IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome after ovarian stimulation using HMG or recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH. The available studies are mostly observational, using different daily doses and modes of administration. No statistically significant differences were observed in ovarian stimulation variables and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates when HMG was compared with recombinant FSH + recombinant LH. Moreover, combined analysis of all the available prospective and retrospective studies produced no firm conclusions in favour of either source of LH bioactivity. Further large randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate the effect of the LH source on IVF outcome and to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from the addition of LH bioactivity supplementation.

Clinical outcomes following long GnRHa ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin plus rFSH or rFSH in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-HMG) plus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus rFSH alone on controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). METHODS: A total of 610 women underwent long gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol for IVF treatment. The subjects were randomized into 2 groups: HP-HMG + rFSH group (n=305) and rFSH group (n=305). The main outcome was the progesterone (P) level on the day of HCG injection. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of the demographic and baseline characters between the two groups. In rFSH group, the P level on the day of HCG trigger were significantly higher than that of HP-HMG+rFSH group (4.3±2.2 vs. 3.8±1.7 nmol/L, P<0.001). The fertilization rate in rFSH group was significantly lower than that of HP-HMG + rFSH group (69.2% vs. 73.9%, P<0.001). Simultaneously, the percentage of cycles with fresh embryo transfer in rFSH group was also significantly lower than that of HP-HMG + rFSH group (49.6% vs. 57.5%, P=0.007). However, there was no difference in terms of cleavage rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of combined HP-HMG with FSH may be superior to rFSH alone in stimulating the ovary in normal responders undergoing IVF treatment. Furthermore, the further prospective studies with large sample are still needed to confirm the study.

The impact of adding hp-hMG in r-FSH started GnRH antagonist cycles on ART outcome.

While luteinizing hormone (LH) activity is believed to play a role in follicle maturation, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) might play an important role in implantation process. We aimed to investigate whether addition of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in recombinant-follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) started GnRH antagonist controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles might enhance implantation rate and improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. A total of 246 patients undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF cycles were analyzed. One hundred and twenty-three cycles (%50) were treated with only r-FSH and 123 cycles were treated with r-FSH plus hp-hMG combination. Total gonadotropin doses, total number of oocytes retrieved, metaphase 2 (MII) oocytes, top quality embryos, fertilization and implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates were compared between the groups. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic details and baseline characteristics. Peak estradiol and progesterone levels in hCG trigger day, number of retrieved oocytes and top quality embryo counts, fertilization rates were similar between the groups. In r-FSH + hp-hMG group, significantly higher implantation rates (35.3% vs 24.3%, p=.017), CPRs (51.2% vs 35.8%, p=.015) and lower OHSS rates (1.6% vs 7.4%, p = .03) were observed respectively compared to r-FSH only treated patients. In conclusion, addition of hp-hMG on the day of antagonist initiation might increase CPRs. A better endometrial receptivity associated with higher implantation rates might be achieved due to hCG component in hp-hMG.

Cumulative Live Birth Rates Following Stimulation With Corifollitropin Alfa Compared With hp-hMG in a GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Ovarian Responders.

Background: Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders have a very low prognosis. Although, it has been proposed that LH supplementation could be beneficial in women with previous hypo-response to FSH. There are no studies comparing the cumulative live birth rates (LBRs) between corifollitropin alfa (CFA) and highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (hp-hMG). Objective: To compare cumulative LBRs in Bologna poor ovarian responders undergoing ovarian stimulation with CFA followed by hp-hMG vs. hp-hMG alone in a GnRH antagonist protocol. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. We included in total 917 poor responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response (POR) at a university-affiliated tertiary center from January 2011 until March 2017. Patients were administered either fixed daily doses of 300-450 IU of hp-hMG (group A) or a single dose of 150 µg of CFA followed by daily injections of ≥300 IU of hp-hMG from Day 8 of stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger (group B), in a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. Results: LBRs after fresh embryo transfer (ET) were similar in group A 71/510 (14%) and B 42/407 (10%). Cumulative LBR per cycle was significantly higher in group A (16.9%) compared to group B (11.8%); (P = 0.03). However, logistic regression analysis showed no association between the type of gonadotropin administered and cumulative LBR. Only age was significantly associated with cumulative LBR (OR = 0.93, P = 0.007). Conclusion: Cumulative LBRs are similar in Bologna poor responders stimulated with CFA followed by hp-hMG compared to hp-hMG monotreatment in an antagonist protocol.

Ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-hMG compared to hp-hMG in patients at risk of poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of two ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF in patients at risk of poor ovarian response: corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-hMG versus daily administration of hp-hMG. We intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the protocol with corifollitropin alfa. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, controlled study. We compared two ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF in 234 patients, under 40 years of age and at risk of poor ovarian response. First protocol was a single injection of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa and the second, a daily injection of 300 IU of hp-hMG during the first week of ovarian stimulation. In both groups, if necessary, a daily injection of 300 IU of hp-hMG was dispensed until the criteria for hCG administration are met. For the primary and secondary outcomes, results were analysed by using a one-sided chi-square test or a Fisher exact test, as appropriate, with a level of significance of 0.05. For continuous variables, parametric (independent t-test) or non-parametric (Mann-Whitney test) tests were used depending on the normality of the distribution. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate (15.2 vs 20.2) (P = 0.33), and the cumulative live birth rate (15.2 vs 22.0) (P = 0.19) per started cycle did not show significant differences between the corifollitropin alfa and hp-hMG groups, and the difference estimated between treatments was -5% [95% CI: (-15.1, 5.0)]. CONCLUSIONS: It was not possible to probe non-inferiority of the protocol with corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-hMG compared to hp-hMG in patients at risk of poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI.

Does ovarian stimulation regimen affect IVF outcome? a two-centre, real-world retrospective study using predominantly cleavage-stage, single embryo transfer.

In this study, ovarian stimulation using highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) for IVF were compared in two large assisted reproduction technique centres in Sweden. A total of 5902 women underwent 9631 oocyte retrievals leading to 8818 embryo transfers (7720 on day 2): single embryo transfers (74.2%); birth rate per embryo transfer (27.7%); multiple birth rate (5.0%); incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (0.71%). Compared with ovarian stimulation with rFSH, women who received HP-HMG were older, had higher dosages of gonadotrophins administered, fewer oocytes retrieved and more embryos transferred. After multivariate analysis controlling for age and generalized estimating equation model, no differences were found in delivery outcomes per embryo transfers between HP-HMG and rFSH, independent of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH) used. Logit curves for live birth rate suggested differences for various subgroups, most prominently for women with high oocyte yield or when high total doses were used. Differences were not significant, perhaps owing to skewed distributions of the FSH compounds versus age and other covariates. These 'real-life patients' had no differences in live birth rate between HP-HMG and rFSH overall or in subgroups of age, embryo score, ovarian sensitivity or use of GnRH analogue regimen.

[Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after stimulation with highly purified hMGfor in vitro fertilization: Observational study SHOview]. / Le syndrome d'hyperstimulation ovarienne après stimulation par hMG hautement purifiée dans le cadre de la fécondation in vitro : étude observationnelle SHOview.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in France are limited. METHODS: Prospective observational multicentric study (23 French centers of IVF) in a cohort of 421 women treated with highly purified hMG (HP-hMG) for the first or second cycle of IVF with or without ICSI. The primary objective was to assess the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS in this cohort. RESULTS: At inclusion, 172 patients (40.9%) were considered at risk of OHSS by the physicians. The main measures for risk minimization taken by the physicians rested on initial dose of HP-hMG and protocol choice. At the end of the follow-up (4 months in average), the rate of OHSS moderate to severe was 2.4% (confidence interval 95%: 1.1-4.3%) for the studied IVF cycle. OHSS was severe for 3 women (0.7%) and moderate for 7 women (1.7%). CONCLUSION: This rate of OHSS after IVF is at the lower limit of the rates reported in the literature for OHSS. This study brings reassuring epidemiological data on the rate of OHSS in women at risk. The measures taken by the physicians to minimize the risk of OHSS could have contributed to this low incidence.

[The influence of exogenous LH/hCG activity on serum progesterone levels on the day of hCG administration in in vitro fertilization]. / Influence de l'activité LH/hCG exogène sur le taux sérique de progestérone le jour de l'hCG en fécondation in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: Clarifying whether the addition of recombinant LH (rLH) to recombinant FSH (rFSH) leads to progesterone (P4) levels on dhCG comparable to those obtained with stimulation with FSH and hCG (HP-hMG) MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pituitary-desensitized patients, matched for age and follicle reserve, received rFSH+LH (n=729) or HP-hMG (n=729). In the rFSH+rLH group, rLH (75 UI/day) was started at day 6. To control for the influence of ovarian response on P4, we divided serum P4 levels by the number of growing follicles (13-22 mm; "per follicle" P4 levels) and performed a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Serum P4 levels on dHCG were lower in the HP-hMG (median: 0.63 ng/mL, max-min: 0.10-2.97) than in the rFSH+rLH group (0.91 ng/mL; 0.10-4.65, P<0.0001), as well as "per-follicle" P4 levels (0.055 ng/mL/growing follicle, 0.006-0.284 vs 0.077 ng/mL/growing follicle, 0.003-0.336; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: HP-hMG led to lower P4 levels on day hCG than rFSH+rLH irrespective of the intensity of the ovarian response and the adjunction of rLH (75 IU/day from day 6 onward).

Cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of rFSH + rLH for the treatment of anovulation in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women.

BACKGROUND: Hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women are characterized by ovarian functionality deficiency, caused by low concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). To recover reproduction functionality, recommended therapies for ovarian induction involve injections of FSH and LH medications. OBJECTIVE: Since important differences exist between recombinant and urinary gonadotropin therapies in terms of efficacy and cost, the objective of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model to compare recombinant FSH (rFSH) + recombinant LH (rLH) and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-HMG). METHODS: A Markov model was developed, considering three cycles of therapy; probability of pregnancy and miscarriage were considered, and the efficacy was evaluated in terms of pregnancy occurrence. The perspective of the model was that of the Italian Health Service, so only direct cost (drugs, specialist visits, patient examinations, and hospitalizations) were included. RESULTS: rFSH + rLH is associated with a higher total cost (€3,453.50) and higher efficacy (0.87) compared with HP-HMG (€2,719.70 and 0.50). rFSH + rLH generated an incremental cost effectiveness ratio equal to €2,007.30 compared to HP-HMG; the average cost per pregnancy is estimated to be €3,990.00 for recombinant strategy and €5,439.80 for urinary strategy. Results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis were consistent with the abovementioned findings. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher acquisition cost in comparison to HP-HMG, rFSH + rLH resulted in a higher pregnancy rate, which makes it the recommended choice when considering cost-effectiveness of LH in supporting FSH-induced follicular gonadotropins in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women.

Comparison of ovulation induction and pregnacy outcomes in IVF patients with normal ovarian reserve who underwent long protocol with recombinant-FSH and highly purified-hMG.

OBJECTIVE: Gonadotropins used in controlled ovarian stimulation have been increasing in number. Beside the recombinant preparations such as rec-FSH, rec-LH and h-hMG human-derived preparations have entered the market. We decided to compare the effects of rec-FSH and HP-hMG with GnRHa on embryo quality and pregnancy outcome in women undergoing an IVF cycle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, data of 87 patients who had applied to our center from 2007 to 2008 and who had met all inclusion criteria, were analyzed. The patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with HP-hMG, rec-FSH following down-regulation with a GnRHa in a long protocol, selected according to determined criteria and acquired embryo via IVF transfer. RESULTS: Of the 87 patients, 44 were stimulated with rec-FSH and 43 with HP-hMG. Distribution of infertility causes was similar between the groups. Duration of gonadotropin administration (p=0.677, Student's t-test) and the total dose of gonadotropin received (p=0.392, Student's t-test) were similar between the two groups. The fertilization rate of the rec-FSH group was significantly higher than the HP-hMG group (p=0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). No significant differences were observed between the study groups in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy parameters. CONCLUSION: The higher oocyte yield with rec-FSH does not result in higher quality embryos. LH activity in combination with FSH activity positively affected the oocyte and embryo maturation. Therefore, when we consider the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates there is no inferiority of HP-hMG in controlled ovarian stimulation.