Randomized comparison of HARVesting the Left Internal Thoracic Artery in a skeletonized versus pedicled technique: the HARVITA trial-study protocol.

Latest research has indicated a potential adverse effect on graft patency rates and clinical outcomes with skeletonizing the left internal thoracic artery. We aim to provide a prospective, randomized, multicentre trial to compare skeletonized versus pedicled harvesting technique of left internal thoracic artery concerning graft patency rates and patient survival. A total of 1350 patients will be randomized to either skeletonized or pedicled harvesting technique and undergo surgical revascularization. Follow-up will be performed at 30 days, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after surgery. The primary outcome will be death or left internal thoracic artery graft occlusion in coronary computed tomography angiography or invasive angiography within 2 years (+/- 3 months) after surgery. The secondary outcome will be major adverse cardiac events (composite outcome of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and repeated revascularization) within 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after surgery. The primary end point will be compared in the modified intention-to-treat population between the two treatment groups using Kaplan-Meier graphs, together with log-rank testing. Hereby, we present the study protocol of the first adequately powered prospective, randomized, multicentre trial which compares skeletonized and pedicled harvesting technique of left internal thoracic artery regarding graft patency rates and patient survival.

Clipless skeletonized internal mammary artery harvesting with harmonic technology.

Since the introduction of the mammary artery harvesting procedure, electrocautery has been used as a standard method of care. However, mammary artery spasm, subadventitial haematoma and mammary artery damage due to clips dispositioning or high thermal energy injury have been recorded. To achieve a perfect mammary artery graft, we propose the usage of a high-frequency ultrasound device, usually recognized as a harmonic scalpel. It reduces thermal-related injuries, the use of clips and the risk of mammary artery spasm and/or dissection.

Development of a fabricated first-flush rainwater harvested technology to meet up the freshwater scarcity in a South Asian megacity, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

The scarcity of freshwater in most of the megacities in the world is an important concern. In this regard, scientifically harvested rainwater could provide an effective measure to this crisis. In this attempt, we developed a cost-effective sensor-based automated first-flush rainwater harvesting system (RHS) to improve the freshwater scarcity and economic development of megacities like Dhaka, Bangladesh. To investigate the performance of the developed system, a suit of representative rainwater samples was systematically collected, preserved, and assessed between the months of July-December 2021 for water quality parameters such as physicochemical (pH, EC, TDS, DO, hardness, and alkalinity), anions (F-, Cl-, NO2 -, NO3 -, Br-, and SO4 2-), elemental (Ca, Mg, Cr, As, Cd, Hg, Pb, Be, Ni, Se, and Fe), and microbial contamination analysis. A Multiparameter digital meter and a titrimetric method were employed for measuring the physicochemical properties whereas elemental concentration was detected using an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer and atomic absorption spectrometer. The changes in microbial contamination in the preserved rainwater were investigated from time to time during the whole experimental period. The findings showed that the mean pH (6.90) and concentrations (mg/L) of other concerning parameters such as TDS (15.5), DO (7.26), hardness (14.9), Cl- (3.59), NO3 - (4.84), SO4 2- (4.62), Fe (<0.2), Cr (0.086 µg/L), As (0.224 µg/L), Cd (0.260 µg/L), Hg (0.270 µg/L), and Pb (5.530 µg/L) in the harvested rainwater samples were below the WHO drinking water guidelines and literature data implying that the harvested rainwater derived from the developed RHS is completely safe for drinking and other uses even in respect to the microbial contamination (total bacterial counts: 0-15 CFU/mL, and total and fecal coliform less than 1.8 MPN/100 mL) for long storage. Hence, this technology has a huge opportunity to mitigate safe freshwater scarcity and groundwater depletion issues, especially in megacities such as Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Impact of the no-touch harvesting technique on the vessel diameter of saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Objectives: To explore the impact of the no-touch harvesting technique on the vessel diameter of saphenous vein grafts. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 166 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting using saphenous vein grafts. Saphenous vein grafts were harvested conventionally in 83 patients (conventional group) and using the no-touch technique in 83 patients (no-touch group). We analyzed graft patency and the vessel diameters of saphenous vein grafts in the pre- and postoperative states. The diameter mismatch between the saphenous vein grafts and the coronary artery at the anastomotic site was also measured; preoperative diameter was measured using ultrasound imaging, and the postoperative diameter was measured using electrocardiogram-gated enhanced computed tomography. Results: A total of 135 saphenous vein grafts (66 and 69 grafts in the conventional and no-touch groups, respectively) were evaluated for postoperative patency. Graft patency was equivalent in the 2 groups (conventional, 96.9% vs no-touch, 100%; P = .24). A detailed evaluation was performed in 109 saphenous vein grafts (52 and 57 grafts in the conventional and no-touch groups, respectively). Saphenous vein graft diameter was significantly distended in the conventional group (preoperative, 2.6 ± 0.7 mm vs postoperative, 3.4 ± 0.5 mm; P < .0001). However, saphenous vein graft diameter did not change in the no-touch group (preoperative, 2.9 ± 0.4 mm vs postoperative 2.8 ± 0.4 mm, P = .33). The diameter mismatch was significantly smaller in the no-touch group (conventional 1.4 ± 0.6 mm vs no-touch 1.0 ± 0.4 mm, P < .0001). Conclusions: The no-touch technique avoids the expansion of graft diameter and diameter mismatch between the saphenous vein grafts and coronary artery.

A Case of Reconstruction of an Open Tibial Fracture (Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB) With Severe Skin and Bone Loss Using Corticocancellous Bone Plugs From the Iliac Crest and an Ilizarov Frame.

Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB fractures include open fractures with extensive soft tissue injury with periosteal stripping and bony exposure. They are usually associated with massive contamination and can be challenging even for experienced surgeons. A multidisciplinary approach among plastic and trauma surgeons is often required. We present a case of a 58-year-old man with a type IIIB open tibial fracture initially managed with a bridging external fixation and primary skin closure using a fasciocutaneous sural flap. Two months later, there was no evidence of fracture healing and an Ilizarov device was applied with corticotomy at the proximal tibial metaphysis, which was modified five months later without changing the frame, placing autogenous iliac bone plugs at the fracture site using the mosaicplasty harvesting technique. Seven months after its initial placement, the Ilizarov device was removed allowing full weight-bearing, with callus formation present at 10-month follow-up. Finally, the patient showed acceptable radiological and functional outcomes after a follow-up of two years. The Ilizarov method should be considered as a therapeutic option for complicated open fractures with severe bone and skin loss. The patient should be fully informed about the complexity of these fractures and the necessity of multiple surgical interventions in order to have realistic expectations.

The radial artery: Open harvesting technique.

The radial artery is an important conduit in coronary artery surgical revascularization due to its robust long-term clinical outcomes. The use of the radial artery has become popularized in recent times. Therefore it is essential for junior surgeons to master harvest techniques that are safe, reliable, and easy to replicate.

Pedicled or skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting - a meta- analysis and trial sequential analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is varying evidence on the role of skeletonization of internal mammary artery in reducing the risk of sternal wound infections and ischemia following bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Post-operative clinical outcomes of skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery versus pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were compared. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane database and Google Scholar from inception until 15 June 2020. All studies directly comparing skeletonized and pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting were included. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Nine studies (one randomized controlled trial and eight observational studies) consisting of 3649 patients (2050 patients with skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery grafting and 1599 patients with pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery grafting) were included. Pooled effects analysis and trial sequential analysis reported significantly lower risk of sternal wound infection with skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.20-0.51, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Skeletonization reduces the risk of sternal wound infections by preserving vasculature as much as possible. This facilitates its use in patients at high risk of sternal wound infection.

In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is semi-skeletonization superior to pedicled harvesting of the left internal mammary artery?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was, 'in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is semi-skeletonized harvesting superior to pedicled harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) in terms of conduit length, flow, rate of sternal wound infections and post-operative bleeding?'. Altogether, 235 papers were found using the reported search, of which 5 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Three studies were cohort studies and 2 were randomized controlled trials. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. One randomized controlled trial showed superiority with semi-skeletonized harvesting in terms of conduit length (P < 0.001), flow (P = 0.004) and diastolic filling (P = 0.005). Three studies included data on surgical wound infections/mediastinitis, all of which reported n = 0. One randomized controlled trial and 3 cohort studies reported that semi-skeletonized harvesting reduced postoperative bleeding. No studies reported a statistically significant difference in operative time. This review suggests that semi-skeletonized harvesting could possibly be associated with favourable outcomes when compared to pedicled harvesting with respect to graft length and flow, and lower postoperative bleeding, without increasing operative time; although there is insufficient data to compare sternal wound infections or long-term outcomes. In conclusion, the limited evidence base prevents robust informed decision-making when comparing both techniques.

Molecular and Functional Phenotypes of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Depend on Harvesting Techniques.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) harvested in different tissues from the same donor exhibit different phenotypes. Each phenotype is not only characterized by a certain pattern of cell surface markers, but also different cellular functionalities. Only recently were different harvesting and processing techniques found to contribute to this phenomenon as well. This study was therefore set up to investigate proteomic and functional properties of human bone marrow-derived MSCs (hBM-MSC). These were taken from the same tissue and donor site but harvested either as aspirate or bone chip cultures. Both MSC populations were profiled for MSC markers defined by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT), MSC markers currently under discussion and markers of particular interest. While classic ISCT MSC markers did not show any significant difference between aspirate and outgrowth hBM-MSCs, our additional characterization panel revealed distinct patterns of differentially expressed markers. Furthermore, hBM-MSCs from aspirate cultures demonstrated a significantly higher osteogenic differentiation potential than outgrowth MSCs, which could be confirmed using a transcriptional approach. Our comparison of MSC phenotypes obtained by different harvesting techniques suggests the need of future standardized harvesting, processing and phenotyping procedures in order to gain better comparability in the MSC field.

Harvest of the right gastroepiploic artery graft using a novel hybrid ultrasonic/bipolar energy device.

BACKGROUND: The right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) is a useful in-situ graft, and skeletonization is effective to prevent spasm and achieve good patency. To harvest the skeletonized RGEA easily, ultrasonic scalpel has been widely used, but the tip shape of conventional ultrasonic device was not optimal for this procedure. Recently, a novel hybrid ultrasonic/bipolar energy device (THUNDERBEAT Open Fine Jaw [TOFJ]) has been developed and is widely used in general surgery. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The operator holds forceps in left hand and TOFJ in right hand, incises the anterior layer of the omentum, and extends the incision distally along the RGEA. The side branches and satellite veins were sealed and cut. Because the tip of the TOFJ is well-designed to easily grasp and peel off the tissue, there is no need to change instruments throughout the procedure. After the dissection was advanced distally, the proximal side was subsequently dissected. CONCLUSIONS: This novel device is useful for harvesting skeletonized RGEA.

Internal mammary harvesting: Techniques and evidence from the literature.

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is one of the most commonly performed cardiac surgeries in the world. CABG using the internal mammary artery (IMA) remains the gold standard intervention for myocardial intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease. IMA harvesting can be performed with various techniques and approaches: pedicled vs skeletonized harvesting technique as well as approaches such as conventional sternotomy, robotic and endoscopic approaches. While each technique and approach have their respective advantages and disadvantages, evidence remains varied between cohorts. Traditionally, IMA has been used as an in situ conduit; however, IMA free grafts also provide satisfactory outcomes in certain situations. This literature review aims to explore the efficacy of different techniques and approaches of IMA harvesting and grafting. With evidence compiled, this will provide an overview of the complexity of CABG and locate gaps in current literature to direct future research.

Novel harvesting technique of no-touch saphenous vein graft using THUNDERBEAT.

The no-touch technique of saphenous vein involves harvesting the vein as a pedicled graft and avoidance of direct contact with the vein or excessive high-pressure expansion. This technique provides long-term graft patency as that of internal mammary artery; however, the wound complications could be greater than conventional skeletonized technique. To solve the problem of leg wound trouble and to harvest the vein simpler, we have developed a novel harvesting technique using a newly developed energy device, THUNDERBEAT. This technique has the ability of efficacious tissue dissection, safer sealing of branches, and less wound complications without thermal damage to the graft. This strategy was successfully used in 35 patients.

No-touch vein grafts and the destiny of venous revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25th anniversary perspective.

Ischemic heart disease is currently the leading cause of death globally, with coronary artery bypass grafting among the most common operations performed worldwide. More extensive use of arterial grafts has been advocated because of their high long-term patency, long-term survival benefit, and freedom from reinterventions. Despite this, the saphenous vein is the most frequently used conduit in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery since its introduction over 50 years ago. Consequently, the saphenous vein remains an indispensable conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting and maintaining its long-term patency is one of the most crucial challenges in cardiovascular surgery. This situation led to the development of the no-touch saphenous vein harvesting technique, where the vein is harvested completely with its pedicle of surrounding tissue. Several studies report a superior long-term patency rate, slower progression of atherosclerosis, and better clinical outcomes whilst employing no-touch harvesting technique. The success of the technique is multifactorial, including the decreased risk for graft spasm-and the need for manual distension-preservation of the vaso vasorum and an intact endothelium, reducing neointimal hyperplasia and subsequent atherosclerosis. Furthermore, the intact perivascular tissue, including the surrounding cushion of fat, may act as a "natural external stent", providing mechanical support preventing the graft from kinking. We are convinced that the use of arterial grafts, in combination with the no-touch saphenous vein graft, will significantly improve the results of coronary artery bypass grafting. This is important for achieving a comprehensive and evidence-based balance between the major treatment strategies of ischemic heart disease, explicitly coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention. The no-touch technique is becoming increasingly popular among surgeons, with further studies to be initiated worldwide.

The no-touch saphenous vein graft in elderly coronary bypass patients with multiple comorbidities is a promising conduit to substitute the left internal thoracic artery.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the patency rates of no-touch saphenous vein grafts anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery compared with the left internal thoracic artery. Further, we compared the patency of no-touch vein grafts to the left anterior descending artery with the patency of no-touch vein grafts to other coronary arteries. METHODS: Of 2635 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting between 2003 and 2008, 168 (6.3%) were given at least a saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending artery to avoid harvesting complications in high-risk patients or in response to a left internal thoracic artery injury. A total of 97 patients were consecutively included after informed consent. A clinical examination and computed tomography angiography were performed on 91 patients at a mean of 6 (4-9) years. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 75.6 ± 8.5 years. Postoperatively, 88.7% of patients (86/97) were free of angina. The 91 examined patients had 163 grafts with 286 distal anastomoses. Crude patency, according to distal anastomoses, was 94.4% (270/286). The patency of single versus sequential no-touch vein grafts to the left anterior descending artery was 98% (50/51) versus 92.5% (37/40). The total patency rate was 95.6% (87/91), similar to the reported patency rate for the left internal thoracic artery. The no-touch grafts to the left anterior descending artery versus other coronaries had a patency of 95.6% (87/91) versus 93.8% (183/195), a high similarity confirmed by an equivalence analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly coronary bypass patients with multiple comorbidities, a no-touch saphenous vein graft is a promising substitute for the left internal thoracic artery.

Donor site morbidity and flap perfusion of subfascial and suprafascial radial forearm flaps: A randomized prospective clinical comparison trial.

PURPOSE: The radial forearm flap is still the most commonly used free flap for the reconstruction of intraoral soft tissue defects. Flap raising can be performed in two ways: with or without integrating the fascia antebrachii into the flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study was performed, comparing the outcomes of 25 subfascial and 25 suprafascial radial forearm flaps. Flap viability was assessed clinically and by measuring flap perfusion parameters. Additionally, donor site morbidity was evaluated for 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Hemoglobin concentration was significantly higher in suprafascial flaps, whereas no difference in flap success rate was observed. No significant differences in donor site morbidity were found. Shrinkage of the full-thickness skin graft was tendentially higher in the subfascial group. Our results do not support the suggestion that subfascial flaps are associated not only with higher success rates but also with a higher donor site morbidity than suprafascial flaps. Despite relevant differences in flap perfusion, neither the flap success rate nor the donor site morbidity differed significantly. CONCLUSION: Both supra- and sub-fascial dissection techniques are reliable methods of radial forearm flap raising, with little clinical difference between them.