Role of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with achalasia who underwent laparoscopic Heller-myotomy with Dor-fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory response is significant prognostic indicator in patients with various diseases. The relationship between prognostic scoring systems based on the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and achalasia in patients treated with laparoscopic Heller­myotomy with Dor­fundoplication (LHD) remains uninvestigated. This study aimed to examine the role of mGPS in patients with achalasia. METHODS: 457 patients with achalasia who underwent LHD as the primary surgery between September 2005 and December 2020 were included. We divided patients into the mGPS 0 and mGPS 1 or 2 groups and compared the patients' background, pathophysiology, symptoms, surgical outcomes, and postoperative course. RESULTS: mGPS was 0 in 379 patients and 1 or 2 in 78 patients. Preoperative vomiting and pneumonia were more common in patients with mGPS of 1 or 2. There were no differences in surgical outcomes. Postoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed that severe esophagitis was more frequently observed in patients with mGPS of 1 or 2 (P < 0.01). The clinical success was 91% and 99% in the mGPS 0 and mGPS 1 or 2 groups, respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although severe reflux esophagitis was more common in patients with achalasia with a high mGPS, good clinical success was obtained regardless of the preoperative mGPS.

Achalasia Treatment. Robotic Approach or Laparoscopy?

Background: Nowadays the question persists whether to choose the endoscopic or surgical method as the first treatment of choice for achalasia. Another debate topic is about the differences between the outcomes of the two approaches of minimally invasive surgical treatment and their feasibility. Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 193 patients with achalasia treated between 2008 and 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups (A and B): 152 with minimally invasive heller myotomy (HM), and 41 with pneumatic dilation (PD). Patients surgically treated were then subdivided into robotic group (RG) and laparoscopic group (LG). Results: The recurrence rate was significantly higher in PD group (Ã?2 = 16.81, DF = 1, p 0.0001), with a success rate of 63,4%, comparing with 92,7% in HM group. No significant difference was obtained between the 2 groups concerning symptom relief on patients successfully treated. The success rate was comparable between the robotic and laparoscopic groups (p = 1). Significant difference was obtained in length of hospital stay between the 2 groups, with a mean of 4.78 +-1.59 days in the RG and, respectively, 5.52 +-2.1 days in the LG (t = 2.40, DF = 124.34, p = 0.0177). Postprocedural esophagitis rates were higher in patients with no fundoplication (6 out of 37 - 16.2%) and in patients treated with pneumatic dilation (4 out of 26 - 15.4%) than in patients with fundoplication (4 out of 46 - 8.5%). Conclusion: The present study indicates that surgery may be a better choice in fit patients for the treatment of achalasia. The procedure has a better success rate, even if the long-term outcomes are comparable in patients successfully treated. The success rate and long-term results were comparable between laparoscopy and robotic surgery.

Management of Esophageal Perforations During Achalasia Treatment Experience of the General and Esophageal Surgery Clinic, Sf Maria Hospital.

Introduction: Achalasia is a motility disorder characterized by the absence of optimal relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) with swallowing and lack of peristalsis of the esophageal body. Excepting temporary medical options, the treatment aims to lower the LES pressure by endoscopic or surgical means. Either method involves a risk of perforation. We analyzed the management of esophageal perforations in patients who received treatment for achalasia. Material and Method: we conducted a retrospective study of patients with achalasia hospitalized and treated in the Clinic of General and Esophageal Surgery within the Sf. Maria Clinical Hospital in Bucharest between January 2016 and December 2021. Results: There were 57 patients, 35 men, with a mean age of 50 years and a mean duration of symptoms of 35 months. Almost all (91.89%) patients presented with dysphagia. Preoperative manometry was performed in 52 patients, of whom 17 were type I, 35 were type II. The treatment was laparoscopic Heller eso-cardiomyotomy (LHM) in most cases (55), with Dor anterior fundoplication. There were 10 recurrent cases after dilation or surgery in another medical unit. There were 3 mucosal perforations after LHM. The treatment varied from simple suture to a combined endoscopic and surgical approach, involving the use of esophageal stent, abscess drainage, and feeding jejunostomy. We also present the management of two cases of esophageal perforation after endoscopic dilation, in which the support of the surgical team was necessary. Conclusion: Esophageal perforation in the treatment of achalasia, either endoscopic or surgical, requires immediate identification and treatment to provide the best chance of favorable evolution. The treatment of achalasia is indicated to be performed in dedicated centers, prepared even in case of complications.

Over ten-year outcomes of laparoscopic Heller-myotomy with Dor-fundoplication with achalasia: single-center experience with annual endoscopic surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller-myotomy with Dor-fundoplication (LHD) is the standard surgical treatment for achalasia; however, surgical outcomes over a period greater than 10 years have not been well-explored. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LHD for achalasia based on a single-center experience. METHODS: Patients who underwent LHD between 1994 and 2019 were included. Of these, we excluded patients who had undergone foregut surgery or whose follow-up data were unavailable. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings and postoperative persistent and/or recurrent symptoms had been assessed annually. Disease-free rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 530 patients (mean age 45.0 years with 267 men) were included. The median follow-up period was 50.5 months. More than 10 years' data were available in 78 patients (14.7%). The cumulative rates of freedom from dysphagia, vomiting, chest pain, and Eckardt score > 3 at 10 years after LHD were 80.1%, 97.5%, 96.3%, and 73.5%, respectively. Probability of esophagitis during 10 years after surgery was 34.4% of patients based on Kaplan-Meier estimation. Approximately 3/4th of patients who had post-LHD esophagitis showed mild esophagitis of Los Angeles classification grade A. Fifteen patients (2.8%) were required a revision of primary LHD. Six patients (1.2%) developed esophageal cancer with an incidence was as high as 219.8/100,000 person-year. All patients with esophageal cancer were found to have early stage tumors that were successfully resected. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic relief post-LHD lasted for over 10 years. The incidence rate of esophageal cancer was high. Regular EGD surveillance seems to be helpful for early detection of esophageal cancer early.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Versus Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: Pros and Cons.

Achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder that has multiple endoscopic and surgical methods of treatment. However, there is no consensus on optimal therapy in patients suffering from this disorder. This review discusses two therapies with similar but technically different concepts, peroral endoscopic myotomy and Heller surgical myotomy. After a brief introduction to the basic problems of achalasia, technical considerations, intra and postprocedural complications are presented and the advantages and disadvantages of the two procedures are discussed, based on the relevant articles in the literature. Heller surgical myotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy appear to be similar in performance with similar results in terms of gastroesophageal reflux rates. However, with experience being gained in the field of endoscopic myotomy, this procedure seems more advantageous, with similar success rates to those of the established surgical technique, but offering shorter operating times, shorter hospitalizations and, ultimately, lower costs.