Hemihepatic versus total hepatic inflow occlusion for laparoscopic hepatectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: An appropriate bleeding control technique for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is needed to decrease intraoperative blood loss and avoid large hemorrhages. To date, hemihepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) versus total hepatic inflow occlusion (TIO) for LLR is still controversial. Thus, we performed this randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR-IOR-17013866) to compare the perioperative outcomes between HIO and TIO for LLR. METHODS: From December 2017 to August 2019, patients met the criteria via surgical exploration in the operation room and were randomly assigned to both groups. Perioperative data between both groups were recorded and compared, and subgroup analysis was further performed. RESULTS: 258 patients were allocated to the TIO (n = 129) and HIO (n = 129) groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative complications, changes in postoperative liver function or early mortality. However, for patients whose transection plane was located on the liver Cantlie's plane, subgroup analysis results indicated that TIO had a shorter operative time (median, 220 vs. 240 min, P = 0.030) and occlusion time (median, 45 vs. 60 min, P = 0.011) and less intraoperative blood loss (median, 200 vs. 300 ml, P = 0.002) than HIO, whereas the morbidity and mortality of the two groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: Both the TIO and HIO approaches could be safely performed for LLR in selected patients when performed by experienced surgeons. The TIO technique for LLR had the advantage of being easier to master than the HIO approach. Additionally, when the transection plane was located on the liver Cantlie's plane, TIO seems to have some superior perioperative outcomes.

A propensity score analysis of two methods of hepatic vascular occlusion in hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The key points in hepatectomy are reducing blood loss and preservation of hepatic function. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of partial hepatectomy using two techniques of hepatic vascular inflow occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1817 patients were selected from our multi-institutional hepatectomy database in China and classified into two groups: the hemihepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) group (n = 1693) and the ipsilateral portal vein branch occlusion (IPVBO) group (n = 124). Propensity score matching of patients in a ratio of 1:1 was conducted. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes were postoperative liver function, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and duration of hospital stay after surgery. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, there were 124 patients in the IPVBO group and the HIO group, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion requirement, operating time, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and duration of hospital stay after surgery (P > 0.05). However, The IPVBO group was associated with significantly lower peak in postoperative ALT level than the HIO group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that IPVBO did not lead to more intraoperative blood loss compared with HIO, and it decreased the peak of postoperative ALT level. In terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, duration of hospital stay after surgery, IPVBO was also equal to HIO. Thus, IPVBO could be an alternative method of hepatic inflow occlusion.