Risk factors for prediabetes in community-dwelling adults: A generalized estimating equation logistic regression approach with natural language processing insights.

The global prevalence of prediabetes is expected to reach 8.3% (587 million people) by 2045, with 70% of people with prediabetes developing diabetes during their lifetimes. We aimed to classify community-dwelling adults with a high risk for prediabetes based on prediabetes-related symptoms and to identify their characteristics, which might be factors associated with prediabetes. We analyzed homecare nursing records (n = 26,840) of 1628 patients aged over 20 years. Using a natural language processing algorithm, we classified each nursing episode as either low-risk or high-risk for prediabetes based on the detected number and category of prediabetes-symptom words. To identify differences between the risk groups, we employed t-tests, chi-square tests, and data visualization. Risk factors for prediabetes were identified using multiple logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations. A total of 3270 episodes (12.18%) were classified as potentially high-risk for prediabetes. There were significant differences in the personal, social, and clinical factors between groups. Results revealed that female sex, age, cancer coverage as part of homecare insurance coverage, and family caregivers were significantly associated with an increased risk of prediabetes. Although prediabetes is not a life-threatening disease, uncontrolled blood glucose can cause unfavorable outcomes for other major diseases. Thus, medical professionals should consider the associated symptoms and risk factors of prediabetes. Moreover, the proposed algorithm may support the detection of individuals at a high risk for prediabetes. Implementing this approach could facilitate proactive monitoring and early intervention, leading to reduced healthcare expenses and better health outcomes for community-dwelling adults.

Factors Associated with Discharge to Skilled Nursing Facility Following Gunshot Wounds.

INTRODUCTION: Firearm injury is a public health crisis. Most victims are minorities in underserved neighborhoods. Measuring firearm injury by mortality underestimates its impact, as most victims survive to discharge. This study was done to determine if race and insurance status are associated with discharge disposition for gunshot wound (GSW)-related trauma. METHODS: Using the 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, we identified GSW patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) = 1-3. Exclusion criteria included patients who died in hospital and routine home discharge. We compared discharge patterns of patients based on demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, payor, AIS, hospital designation, and length of stay [LOS]) and injury severity. Multivariable logistic regression models identified factors associated with discharge disposition. RESULTS: Our sample included 2437 patients with GSWs. On univariable analysis, Black patients were more likely to discharge to home with home health (64.1% Black versus 34.7% White; P < 0.001). White patients were more likely to discharge to skilled nursing facility (SNF) (51.4% White versus 44.6% Black; P < 0.001). Controlling for age, race, Latin ethnicity, primary payor, LOS, AIS severity, and injury severity score factors independently associated with discharge to SNF included age (0.0462, P < 0.001), Medicaid (1.136, P < 0.0003), Medicare (1.452, P < 0.001), and LOS (0.03745, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postacute care following traumatic injuries is essential to recovery. Black GSW victims are more likely to be discharged to home health than White patients, who are more likely to be discharged to SNF. Targeted programs to reduce barriers to appropriate aftercare are necessary to eliminate this bias and improve the care of underserved populations.

A multi-language qualitative study of limited English proficiency patient experiences in the United States.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the limited English proficiency patient experience with health care services in an urban setting in the United States. Methods: Through a narrative analysis approach, 71 individuals who spoke either Spanish, Russian, Cantonese, Mandarin, or Korean shared their experiences through semi-structured interviews between 2016 and 2018. Analyses used monolingual and multilingual open coding approaches to generate themes. Results: Six themes illustrated patient experiences and identified sources of structural inequities perpetuating language barriers at the point of care. An important thread throughout all interviews was the sense that the language barrier with clinicians posed a threat to their safety when receiving healthcare, citing an acute awareness of additional risk for harm they might experience. Participants also consistently identified factors they felt would improve their sense of security that were specific to clinician interactions. Differences in experiences were specific to culture and heritage. Conclusions: The findings highlight the ongoing challenges spoken language barriers pose across multiple points of care in the United States' health care system. Innovation: The multi-language nature of this study and its methodological insights are innovative as most studies have focused on clinicians or patient experiences in a single language.

Examining the role of race and quality of home health agencies in delayed initiation of home health services for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

INTRODUCTION: We examined differences in the timeliness of the initiation of home health care by race and the quality of home health agencies (HHA) among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). METHODS: Medicare claims and home health assessment data were used for the study cohort: individuals aged ≥65 years with ADRD, and discharged from the hospital. Home health latency was defined as patients receiving home health care after 2 days following hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of 251,887 patients with ADRD, 57% received home health within 2 days following hospital discharge. Black patients were significantly more likely to experience home health latency (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-1.19) compared to White patients. Home health latency was significantly higher for Black patients in low-rating HHA (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.22-1.37) compared to White patients in high-rating HHA. DISCUSSION: Black patients are more likely to experience a delay in home health care initiation than White patients.

Left behind again: Rural home health services in a Medicaid pediatric accountable care organization.

PURPOSE: To contrast trends in rural and urban pediatric home health care use among Medicaid enrollees. METHODS: Medicaid administrative claims data were used to assess differences in home health care use for child members in a large pediatric accountable care organization (ACO) in Ohio. Descriptive statistics assessed rural and urban differences in health care use over a 10-year period between 2010 and 2019. FINDINGS: Pediatric home health care use increased markedly in the low-income (CFC) and disabled (ABD) Medicaid categories. Over the past 10 years, CFC-enrolled children from urban communities have seen more home health visits, fewer emergency department (ED) visits, and more well child visits compared to rural CFC-enrolled children. Children enrolled due to disabilities in urban communities have also seen more home health visit use but fewer preventive care visits than their rural counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Within a pediatric ACO, rural home health care use has remained relatively stagnant over a 10-year period, a stark contrast to increases in home health care use among comparable urban populations. There are likely multiple explanations for these differences, including overuse in urban communities, lack of access in rural communities, and changes to home health reimbursement. More can be done to improve rural home health access. Such improvement will likely necessitate large-scale changes to home health care delivery, workforce, and financing. Improvements should be evaluated for return-on-investment not only in terms of direct costs, that is, reduced inpatient or ED costs, but also in terms of patient and family quality-of-life or key indicators of child well-being such as educational attainment.

Home Infusions for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Are Safe: US Experience and Patient Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Home infusions (HIs) for biologic medications are an option for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in the United States. We aimed to describe the population receiving HIs and report patient experience with HIs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Quintiles-IMSLegacy PharMetrics Adjudicated Claims Database from 2010 to 2016 to describe the population receiving infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) HIs and determine predictors for an urgent/emergent visit post-HIs. We then administered a cross-sectional survey to IBD Partners Internet-based cohort participants to assess knowledge and experience with infusions. RESULTS: We identified claims for 11 892 conventional IFX patients, 1573 home IFX patients, 438 conventional VDZ patients, and 138 home VDZ patients. There were no differences in demographics or median charges with IFX home and conventional infusions. Home VDZ infusions had a greater median charge than conventional VDZ infusion. Less than 4% of patients had an urgent/emergent visit post-HIs. Charlson comorbidity index > 0 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.77) and Medicaid (OR: 3.01; 95% CI, 1.53-5.94) conferred significantly higher odds of urgent/emergent visit post-HIs. In IBD Partners, 644 IBD patients responded; 56 received HIs. The majority chose HIs to save time and preferred HIs to conventional infusions. Only 2 patients reported an urgent/emergent visit for HI-related problems. CONCLUSIONS: HI appears to be safe in IBD patients receiving IFX and VDZ. However, patients with fewer resources and more comorbidities are at increased risk for an urgent/emergent visit post-HIs. The overall patient experience with HI is positive. Expansion of HIs may result in decreased therapy-related logistic burden for carefully selected patients.

From Hospital to Home: An Intensive Transitional Care Management Intervention for Patients with COVID-19.

Implementing emergency department (ED) and hospital patient throughput management coupled with at-home medical and tele-management upon discharge may increase surge capacity during national emergencies and pandemics. This novel intensive transitional care management (ITCM) intervention presents the opportunity to optimize hospital bed capacity through prevention of inpatient admissions for patients who could be discharged home safely with appropriate in-home medical support and tele-management. This observational cohort intervention was conducted between April 7, 2020 and April 30, 2020, at the 4 largest inpatient facilities of RWJBarnabas Health System in New Jersey. The intervention group included a convenience sample of 192 patients who were evaluated in the ED, monitored in the observation unit, or admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection. Their outcomes were compared to a matched comparison group of 593 patients who were admitted with the same COVID-19-related diagnosis and severity. The primary outcome was the reduction in inpatient days as a result of the intervention that included provision of at-home oxygen supplementation therapy, expanded home care services, and tele-management sessions. Secondary outcomes were re-encounters with the health system in the ED, observation unit, or inpatient readmissions. A total of 481.6 hospital patient days were avoided for 78 patients who had been discharged from the ED or observation unit stays. Secondary analysis included hospital readmission rates. The ITCM intervention demonstrated a feasible strategy for improving throughput of patients with COVID-19, resulting in increased hospital bed capacity.

Use of home health and other healthcare delivery pathways among privately insured patients with and without treatment-resistant depression.

Objective: To assess the real-world use of home health services (HHS) among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with and without treatment-resistant depression (TRD).Methods: Adults (18-64 years) from a commercial claims database (07/2009 to 03/2015) were categorized into three cohorts: "TRD"(N = 6411), "non-TRD MDD"(N = 33,068), "non-MDD"(N = 149,884) stratified based on use of HHS (HHS vs. no-HHS). Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs were evaluated up to two years following the first antidepressant pharmacy claim using descriptive statistics. HRU (e.g. inpatient, outpatient, emergency department visits) and costs were measured per-patient-per-year (PPPY) in 2015 USD.Results: During the follow-up period, 18.0% of TRD, 12.4% of non-TRD MDD, and 6.5% of non-MDD patients received HHS. Mean all-cause healthcare costs PPPY were numerically higher among patients with HHS use. Among the TRD cohort, patients using HHS had healthcare costs of $40,040 PPPY while patients with TRD and no-HHS had healthcare costs of $12,272 PPPY. Within the non-TRD MDD cohort, HHS users incurred healthcare costs of $28,767 PPPY and non-HHS users incurred costs of $7227 PPPY. Patients without MDD who used HHS had annual healthcare costs of $22,340 while non-MDD patients who did not use HHS had healthcare costs of $3479 PPPY. However, among HHS users, HHS costs represented a relatively small proportion of total healthcare costs.Conclusions: The high proportion of TRD patients using HHS suggests it is a utilized healthcare delivery pathway by TRD patients.

Home Health Services Are Not Required for Select Total Hip Arthroplasty Candidates: Assessment and Supplementation With an Electronic Recovery Application.

BACKGROUND: At our institution, all postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) candidates have received home health services (HHS), consisting of visiting nurses, physical and occupational therapists. However, with a more technologically inclined patient population, electronic patient rehabilitation applications (EPRAs) can be used to deliver perioperative care at the comfort of the patient's home. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical utility and economic burden associated with digital rehabilitation applications in primary THA recipients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of patients operated between November 2016 and November 2017. Before surgery, and at the discretion of the surgeon, patients were assigned to EPRA with HHS or EPRA alone. Patient baseline demographics, EPRA engagement, and validated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected (Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey [VR-12] and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior) at baseline and 12 weeks. These PRO scores were correlated with cohort assignments to assess noninferiority of EPRA alone. RESULTS: In total, 268 patients received either EPRA-HHS (n = 169) or EPRA (n = 99) alone. Patients receiving EPRA only were on average younger (60.8 vs 65.8; P < .0001), but otherwise similar to patients in the EPRA-HHS cohort. EPRA-only patients demonstrated no differences in VR-12 (P > .05) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (P > .05) when compared with EPRA-HHS. CONCLUSION: The integration of electronic rehabilitation tools is gaining acceptance within the orthopedic community. Our study demonstrated that EPRA alone was clinically noninferior while substantially less costly than EPRA-HHS.

Depression prevalence and treatment among older home health services users in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to provide a nationally representative estimate of the rates of depression and depression treatment, and to explore factors associated with receipt of depression treatment, among older home health services users. METHODS: Older home health services users (n = 1666) were selected from 2008 to 2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Depression was measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Depression treatment included antidepressants use and receipt of mental health counseling or psychotherapy. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of individual characteristics and receipt of depression treatment. RESULTS: Current depression affected 23% of older home health services users. Less than 40% of those who screened positive for depression reported receiving depression treatment. Among those who received treatment, virtually all (99.8%) reported receiving antidepressants and only 9.5% reported receiving psychotherapy. Among older home health services users with current depression, older age and non-Hispanic black race were associated with lower odds of receiving depression treatment whereas having cognitive impairment was positively associated with receiving depression treatment. CONCLUSION: Depression affects a substantial proportion of older home health services users and is undertreated. Home health services settings may be important platforms to improve depression care among older adults. Future research is needed to develop optimal strategies for integrating depression assessment and treatment in home health services settings.

Systematic Review of Racial/Ethnic Outcome Disparities in Home Health Care.

INTRODUCTION: Though extensive evidence demonstrates that U.S. minority patients suffer health care disparities, the incidence of disparities among the 3.3 million adult patients receiving skilled intermittent home health care services annually is unclear. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the relationship of race/ethnicity on home health care patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: PRISMA guidelines were used to perform a systematic search of the literature within the CINHAL, Medline, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included variations on the terms: home health, minority race/ethnicity, and patient outcomes. Included studies evaluated adult patient outcomes to intermittent skilled home health care services from Medicare-certified agencies using federally defined race/ethnicity categories. Research quality was evaluated using the Johns Hopkins Evidence Based Practice Grading Scale. RESULTS: Seven studies were identified in the search. All studies were of good-to-high quality with the majority having large samples. All seven found a significant difference in patient outcomes related to race/ethnicity. Specifically, minority patients had more adverse events, less improvement in functional outcomes, and worse patient experiences when compared with majority patients. CONCLUSION: Home health care disparities exist and efforts should be made to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate care to all patients.

A cross-sectional evaluation of home health service in patients with chronic neurologic diseases in a province of Turkey.

In this study, we aimed to compare patients' characteristics, comorbid risk factors, medical supplies, and caregivers' demographics between stroke patients and patients with other chronic neurological diseases receiving home health services. In our study, between November 2013 and March 2014, chronic neurological disease (CND) patients having home health services were enrolled in the study. During patient visits, patients were assessed by the questionnaire comprising the modified Rankin scale (mRS), Barthel index, Zarit caregiver burden scale, and mini nutritional assessment (MNA). Stroke patients were classified as Group I, and the other neurologic diseases as Group II. A total of 202 patients including stroke patients (n = 112), dementia (n = 64), Parkinson's disease (n = 17), motor neuron disease (n = 4), brain cancer (n = 2), cerebral palsy (n = 1), multiple sclerosis (n = 1), and head trauma (n = 1) answered the questionnaire. The mean age of Group I (61K:51E) was 76.6 ± 9.1 years; the Group II (28M:62F) was 80.9 ± 12.3 years. The mean age of Group I was significantly lower than Group II (p = 0.005) and the number of male patients in Group I was significantly higher (p = 0.001). The educational status between the two groups was not significantly different in terms of duration of illness and addiction. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of Zarit caregiver burden scale, Barthel index, and mRS. The presence of malnutrition (MNA < 17) was significantly lower in Group I (p = 0.007). There was no difference between stroke patients and other CND patients group in terms of caregiver burden and psychosocial status except for malnutrition. Being careful on nutritional support and providing appropriate nutritional support in other CND patients are expected to increase the life quality.