The relationship between humeral head angulation and bone void within the humeral head in proximal humerus fractures.

Background: The variability of humeral head angulation in proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) is a noteworthy observation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential association between humeral head angulation and bone void within the humeral head in PHFs. Methods: We used the reconstruction function in Mimics software to generate three-dimensional models of fractures. Bony landmarks were employed to accurately define the calcar and humeral head zone. Boolean subtraction was performed to calculate the volume of head bone void. Results: The cohort consisted of 60 (74.1 %) varus, 21 (25.9 %) valgus, and 23 (22.1 %) neutral angulated PHFs. The mean percentage of humeral head bone void was 38.5 ± 17.8 in varus, 36.3 ± 15.7 in valgus, and 30.1 ± 10.6 in neutral angulated PHFs. A significant difference was observed between the varus and neutral groups (P = 0.035). In addition, an analysis of humeral head bone void was conducted among patients aged over 65 years old, revealing a mean percentage of 42.7 ± 16.4 in varus (27 cases), 34.8 ± 14.5 in valgus (13 cases), and 28.1 ± 11.8 in neutral (8 cases) angulated PHFs. The difference between the varus and neutral groups was also significant (P = 0.023). Conclusion: All types of angulation patterns exhibited humeral head bone void to some extent, with the varus-displaced PHFs demonstrating more obvious defects in comparison to the neutral angulated type.

Development of the humeral head offset index for control of humeral torsion.

BACKGROUND: Control of humeral torsion can present a challenge, especially intraoperatively during closed reduction and fixation of humeral shaft fractures or 2-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus. The objective of this study is to develop and validate an indirect method for the assessment of humeral torsion using an index that is linearly correlated with rotational arm position and can be derived from only a single plain radiographic image of the proximal humerus. METHODS: The Humeral Head Offset Index (HHOI) is calculated as the ratio of the medial and lateral offset of the humeral head measured from the outer cortices of the shaft on a plain radiographic or fluoroscopic image. The relationship of HHOI with humeral torsion was first verified on a sawbone model with radiopaque characteristics under fluoroscopic control. Different degrees of retroversion were simulated through manual rotation of the humerus with a digital protractor in 5° increments until 40° internally rotated and then in 5° increments until 40° externally rotated from the neutral position. The same procedure was subsequently performed digitally on Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) from computed tomography (CT) dataset of the sawbone. Next, the HHOI index was applied to eight randomly selected patients with total humerus CT using the same method. Spearman's rho was calculated for the bivariate analysis of correlation between the simulated degree of retroversion and the HHOI. Strength of correlation was classified according to Koo and Li. Interrater and intrarater reliability of three blinded observers with repetition of measurement after three months were analyzed by assessing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Both in the sawbone model and in DRRs, we demonstrated a high to very high significant linear correlation between simulated retroversion and the HHOI. ICC values demonstrated excellent interrater reliability and excellent intrarater reliability for measurement of the HHOI. CONCLUSIONS: The HHOI is a new, simple, reliable index that has a linear relationship to the rotation of the humerus and can therefore allow an indirect control of humeral torsion in comparison to the contralateral side.

Changes in the Articular Cartilage Thickness in Patients with Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Study with a Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the progression of cartilage thinning in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears using MRI. Methods: Two hundred twenty-five consecutive patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears visited our institute between 2009 and 2019. Of these, 28 shoulders of 27 patients (mean age, 65 years) who underwent at least two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were prospectively enrolled. They all received conservative treatment. The mean follow-up was 67 months. Changes in cartilage thickness and the combined cartilage and subchondral bone thickness at the initial and final MRI were measured using a RadiAnt DICOM-viewer (Medixant, Poznan, Poland). The cartilage thickness of the humeral head was measured in the oblique coronal and sagittal images. The glenoid cartilage was measured in the axial and oblique coronal images. Results: At an average period of 5 years, 12 of 28 shoulders (42%) showed more than a 30% decrease in cartilage thickness in the humeral head. The glenoid showed cartilage thinning in only one shoulder (4%). In the humeral head, progressive cartilage thinning was seen mainly in the anterior and posterior parts of the humeral head in the sagittal plane. In the glenoid, progressive cartilage thinning was seen on the entire surface except the posterior area. There was no significant difference in cartilage thickness between the first and final follow-ups for both the humeral head and the glenoid. Conclusions: A total of 12 of 28 shoulders (42%) showed more than a 30% decrease in cartilage thickness in the humeral head, which was mainly observed in the anterior and posterior areas of the humeral head.

Management of osteonecrosis of the humeral head in the pediatric population: A systematic review.

Purpose: Humeral head osteonecrosis in the pediatric patients most often occurs in patients with underlying hemoglobinopathies, exposure to chronic corticosteroids, or after trauma. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review evaluating the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management of humeral head osteonecrosis in the pediatric population. Methods: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus were screened with the terms "osteonecrosis," "avascular necrosis," "pediatric," and "proximal humerus" on January 10, 2024. A total of 218 studies were screened, and 74 studies were evaluated for eligibility. Studies that reported on the prevalence and/or management of pediatric humeral head osteonecrosis were included. The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria: four retrospective case series, three prospective case series, one retrospective cohort study, one retrospective case-control study, and three case reports. A majority of the studies (67%) discussed chemotherapy-induced osteonecrosis of the humeral head. A total of 77 patients (106 shoulders) with humeral head osteonecrosis were identified. The overall prevalence of osteonecrosis of the humeral head across eight studies examining at-risk populations (underlying hemoglobinopathies or undergoing chemotherapy) was 2%. Intra-articular steroid injections, physical therapy, and activity modification are effective conservative management strategies. Additionally, core decompression and hemiarthroplasty are surgical treatment options. Conclusions: The prevalence of osteonecrosis of the humeral head is low even among at-risk populations with associated medical conditions. A variety of conservative and surgical treatment options have been described, but no comparative evaluations of these modalities has been conducted. Level of evidence: IV.

Functional composite spacer (antibiotic cement around a hemiarthroplasty) for the treatment of shoulder infections: minimum 5-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infections remain a challenging complication after shoulder arthroplasty, and an ideal treatment protocol has yet to be established. Two-stage revision is a common approach. Historically, the first stage entails placement of an all-cement antibiotic spacer. Although prior studies have reported on cement spacers as definitive management, persistent pain and inadequate function often lead many to later request a second-stage procedure. The functional composite spacer consists of a humeral hemiarthroplasty implant with antibiotic cement coated around the stem alone to preserve the metallic humeral head-glenoid articulation. Functional composite spacers have demonstrated improvements in function and motion with high patient satisfaction at 25 months, but longer-term follow-up is needed to better understand the role it may play in the management of shoulder infections. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes at a minimum of 5 years in patients who initially planned to undergo 2-stage revision but elected to retain the functional spacer. METHODS: A retrospective review of a single institution's shoulder surgery repository from 2007 to 2018 identified 30 patients who underwent placement of a composite spacer. Overall, 5 patients underwent second-stage reimplantation and 12 patients did not have 5-year follow-up (6 lost to follow-up and 6 deceased). A total of 13 patients were included who maintained a functional composite spacer and had minimum 5-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, visual analog scale function, and visual analog score pain), satisfaction, range of motion, and radiographic estimation of glenoid wear were evaluated. RESULTS: Two of 13 patients (15%) required additional surgery: 1 secondary closure for early superficial wound dehiscence and 1 revision spacer for pain. There were no reinfections. At most recent follow-up, patient satisfaction was high and significant improvements were noted for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (45.4; P < .001), Simple Shoulder Test (5.3; P = .003), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (47.3; P = .002), visual analog scale function (4.9; P = .004), and visual analog score pain (-4.4; P = .007) as well as range of motion including abduction (39.2°; P = .005) and elevation (65.9°; P = .005). There was no significant change in humeral head medialization (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who do not undergo an early revision and retain a functional composite spacer maintain good function and range of motion with minimal pain at midterm follow-up.

Intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures does not achieve superior functional results to non-operative treatment in the long term.

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative treatment (NOT) of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) has regained significance due to recent evidence. Additionally, positive outcomes of plate osteosynthesis and fracture arthroplasty prompt a reassessment of the role of intramedullary nailing (IMN). While favorable short and medium-term results have been documented following IMN, little is known regarding functional outcomes and quality of life in the long-term. METHODS: Data from 180 patients with dislocated PHF of Neer types III, IV and V, treated at our level-I trauma center between 2004 and 2014 using IMN or NOT therapy, were scanned. Patients were re-evaluated after a minimum of 5 years to assess functional outcomes (age- and sex-adapted Constant Score, QuickDASH), quality of life (SF12), and complications or reoperations. RESULTS: Out of the initially identified 180 patients, 51 were unavailable for follow-up (FU) and 71 had deceased during the FU period. Functional outcomes and quality of life was, therefore, assessed in 58 patients (30 IMN, 28 NOT) with an average age at injury of 68 years after a mean FU time of 10.3 ± 3.4 years. Epidemiological patient characteristics did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups (p > .05). The functional outcome assessed by age- and sex-adapted Constant Score (NOT: 74 ± 28; IMN: 68 ± 24; p = .438), QuickDASH (NOT: 25 ± 27; IMN: 31 ± 23; p = .374) or quality of life using the SF12 (p > .05) revealed no significant disparities in long-term outcomes between the treatment groups. 10 of 30 patients in the IMN group underwent surgical revision to address complications, exceeding mere implant removal. Conversely, no patient in the NOT group underwent a revision surgery during the FU period. CONCLUSIONS: In the long-term, functional and quality of life-related outcomes of IMN did not diverge significantly from those of NOT, while causing a higher incidence of follow-up interventions.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction using the Long Head of Biceps Tendon: A Biomechanical Assessment of Tenodesis Location and Angle of Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) treated with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using the long head of the biceps tendon have shown satisfactory early results. Different techniques and positions for biceps tenodesis have been described. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of tenodesis location and glenohumeral fixation angle for graft tensioning on the biomechanics of a SCR using a single strand biceps technique. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders were mounted to a custom biomechanical simulator which employed static tone loads to the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles. All cadavers were first tested in the intact condition, and then in the simulated MIRCT condition by sectioning the tendinous insertions of the supraspinatus and upper border of the infraspinatus. SCR using the long head of the biceps tendon was then evaluated. Three biceps tenodesis locations relative to the greater tuberosity (anterior, middle, and posterior) and two glenohumeral fixation angles (0° and 30°) for graft tensioning were tested. An optical tracking system was used to quantify superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) humeral head translation relative to the glenoid, while the functional abduction force was quantified using a load sensor. All tests were conducted at 0°, 30° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in a randomized fashion. RESULTS: When assessing isolated superior humeral head migration, all biceps tenodesis locations were effective at decreasing superior migration, with no tenodesis location significantly better than the other (P=0.213). However, biceps grafts tensioned at 30° of glenohumeral abduction were significantly better at reducing proximal humeral migration as compared to graft tensioning at 0° abduction (P=0.008). Posterior humeral head translation observed in the MIRCT condition was significantly reduced when tensioning the biceps tendon at 30° of glenohumeral abduction compared to 0° for all tenodesis locations (P≤0.043). Tenodesis location also significantly influenced posterior humeral head translation (P=0.001), with middle and posterior positions restoring near normal humeral head position when fixed at 30° glenohumeral abduction. All SCR techniques using the biceps tendon improved the functional abduction force relative to the MIRCT condition, although no statistically significant differences were observed relative to the intact condition (P≥0.448). DISCUSSION: SCR using the long head biceps tendon is biomechanically effective in reducing posterosuperior translation of the humeral head in the setting of a MIRCT. Graft tensioning and fixation at 30° of glenohumeral abduction combined with either a middle or posterior tenodesis location on the greater tuberosity most effectively restores near normal time-zero humeral head kinematics.

Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Plays a Role in Stress Absorption and Humeral Head Restriction during the Late Cocking and Deceleration Phases of Overhead Throwing: A Finite Element Study.

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that the long head of the biceps (LHBT) may play a role in stabilizing the glenohumeral joint, and this has led to controversy around the efficacy of biceps tenotomy for superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions. Therefore, the aim of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to determine the stress absorption and humeral head translation restriction effects of the LHBT within the glenohumeral joint during the late cocking and deceleration phases of overhead throwing with a view to resolving the controversy around tenotomy. METHODS: Eight FEA models were created using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data from normal glenohumeral joints. The models represented four LHBT conditions: uninjured, subpectoral tenodesis, tenotomy, and type II SLAP lesions. The late cocking and deceleration phases of the overhead throwing were simulated for each model. The impacts of the four LHBT conditions on glenohumeral joint stress absorption and humeral head displacement restriction were studied based on 1) stress and related distributions on the cartilage, labrum, capsule, and LHBT and 2) humeral head translation variation. RESULTS: The FEA analysis showed that the magnitude of the contact stress on the articular cartilage, labrum, and capsule was the lowest in the uninjured models, followed by the subpectoral tenodesis, tenotomy, and type II SLAP lesion models. Humeral head translation was the most restricted in the subpectoral tenodesis models, followed by the tenotomy and type II SLAP lesion models. CONCLUSION: Finite element analysis demonstrated that the LHBT plays a significant role in stress absorption and displacement restriction in the late cocking and deceleration phases of overhead throwing. Subpectoral tenodesis of the LHBT exhibited lesser amount of stress and humeral head translation than those of tenotomy, thereby making it a better option for patients who engage in overhead throwing.

Structural bone grafting for glenoid bone loss in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a case series and technique report.

Background: Posterior glenoid bone loss in glenohumeral osteoarthritis poses significant challenges in shoulder arthroplasty. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a humeral head autograft to address the glenoid bone deficiency is an option for these difficult cases. Variable results with this procedure are reported in the literature. This article describes the surgical technique of posterior glenoid bone grafting in TSA using a glenoid implant with hybrid fixation and a series of reported patient functional and radiographic outcomes. Methods: A retrospective chart review of cases from 2015 to 2020 by a single surgeon revealed 10 patients who underwent primary TSA with hybrid glenoid component and posterior glenoid bone grafting. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were assessed for glenoid inclination, glenoid version, acromiohumeral distance, humeral stem status, and glenoid implant status. Functional outcomes were evaluated by range of motion, strength, and patient-reported clinical outcomes (pain and function on a visual analog scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score). Complications and reoperations were also evaluated. Results: Average follow-up was 31.4 months, active forward flexion and external rotation improved on average from 105° to 150° and 20° to 60°, respectively (P < .001) and average abduction improved from 100° to 140° (P < .002). At an average of 26.7 months, patients reported assessments (visual analog scale pain and function, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores) reveal significant (P < .05) improvement in pain and functional outcomes. Radiographically, at 23.0 ± 20.1 months, all patients demonstrated a well-fixed humeral and glenoid component without evidence of lucent lines. The bone graft used in each patient was well unionized and no radiographic complications were reported. No patients underwent revision surgery, and there was one clinical complication reported, which consisted of a suspected rotator cuff injury at follow-up. Conclusion: Hybrid fixation with structural glenoid bone grafting in TSA resulted in excellent outcomes with no evidence of graft or component failure on follow-up radiographs and significantly reduced pain, improved functional scores, and improved active range of motion.

Proposed complementary osteological indicators: Advancing the estimation of puberty stages in Bioarcheology.

OBJECTIVES: The study of puberty is a well-established area of bioarcheological research, which greatly enhances our understanding of adolescence and growth in the past. Since the publications of Shapland and Lewis' works, which have become "standards" for estimating puberty in skeletal material, no additional osteological indicators of puberty have been proposed. Nevertheless, clinical practice constantly develops skeletal maturation markers that could be useful in bioarcheology. This study aims to assess the applicability and reliability of novel puberty indicators as a complementary tool to estimate puberty in skeletal remains. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four new maturation markers including spheno-occipital synchondrosis, humeral head ossification, calcaneal apophysis ossification, and mandibular premolar mineralization were selected and applied to a sample of 85 adolescents from pre-Roman southern Italy (Pontecagnano, 7th-4th BCE). RESULTS: Despite some limits in adapting the original clinical methods to osteoarcheological material, the use of these novel skeletal indicators had moderate to excellent scoring repeatability and an overall high agreement with the puberty and menarche status previously estimated with standard methods. These results encourage us to apply these markers in bioarcheology. In some cases, minor adaptations of the original scoring systems are suggested to enhance reliability. DISCUSSION: Including the proposed indicators in routine puberty data collection allows us to refine puberty estimation and improve the ability to identify key growth milestones in poorly preserved skeletons. Further application to osteological collections with diverse chronology and geographical differences is needed to assess how and to what extent the newly proposed maturation markers perform.

Treatment of osteochondral injuries of the humeral head using fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation.

Background: Large osteochondral lesions of the humeral head can result from locked posterior dislocations, avascular necrosis, and osteochondritis dissecans. Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a treatment option for young patients with focal osteochondral defects of the humeral head. The purpose of this case series was to assess graft survivorship, subjective patient-reported outcomes, and satisfaction among 7 patients who underwent OCA transplantation of the humeral head. Methods: We identified 7 patients who underwent humeral head OCA transplantation between 2008 and 2017. A custom questionnaire including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (QuickDash), Likert satisfaction, and reoperations was mailed to each patient. Clinical failure was defined as further surgery that involved removal of the allograft. Results: Median follow-up duration was 10 years (range, 4.6 to 13.5 years) with a median age of 21.6 years (range, 18.5 to 43.5 years). Most patients (86%) reported improved function and reduced pain. At the final follow-up, 71% of patients reported ongoing problems with their shoulder including pain, stiffness, clicking/grinding, limited range of motion, and instability. Return to recreational activities was high at 86% but 43% expressed limitations with activity due to their shoulder. Overall satisfaction was high at 71% with mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and QuickDASH scores at 62.4 and 29.2, respectively. Reoperation after OCA occurred in 1 patient (14%). Conclusion: Among this case series of 7 patients who underwent OCA transplantation of the humeral head, patient satisfaction was high at 10-year follow-up and most returned to recreational activity although most also had persistent shoulder symptoms.

Anatomic Reversal of Shoulder Joint After Neck of Humerus Fracture.

We report on a singular case of a unique form of post-traumatic reversal of the humeral head after humeral neck fracture, in which the pattern of collapse resulted in the formation of a native reverse polarity shoulder. In essence, the humeral head became a socket, and the glenoid rounded to become a head with well-preserved shoulder function. To our knowledge, this is the first case of an acquired shoulder deformity that bears a remarkable functional similarity to a prosthetic reverse polarity shoulder replacement.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty is associated With Less Pain and Better Functional Outcomes, but Humeral Head Resurfacing may be Preferred in Younger, Higher Demand Patients: A Short-Term Outcomes Study in Patients with Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) and Humeral Head Resurfacing (HHR) in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). Methods: A retrospective analysis included patients who had undergone either TSA or HHR for GHOA at a single institution. Baseline demographics, complications, range of motion (active forward flexion, FF and active external rotation, ER), visual analog scores (VAS), and Subjective Shoulder Values (SSV) were collected. Results: A total of 69 TSA and 56 HHR patients were analyzed. More HHR patients were laborers (44% versus 21%, P=0.01). There were more smokers in the TSA group (25% versus 11%, P=0.04) and more cardiovascular disease in the HHR cohort (64% versus. 6%, p<0.0001). Postoperative FF was similar, but ER was greater in the HHR (47° ± 15°) vs. TSA group (40° ± 12°, P = 0.01). VAS was lower after TSA vs. HHR (median 0, IQR 1 versus median 3.7, IQR 6.9, p<0.0001), and SSV was higher after TSA (89% ± 13% vs. 75% ± 20% after HHR; p<0.0001). Post-operative impingement was more common after HHR (32% vs. 3% for TSA, p<0.0001). All other complications were equivalent. Conclusion: While younger patients and heavy laborers had improved ER following HHR, their pain relief was greater after TSA. Decisions on surgical technique should be based on patient-specific demographic and anatomic factors.

Unexpected positive cultures of humeral head detected with dithiothreitol in primary shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) are frequently observed in primary shoulder arthroplasty, and its clinical significance has not yet been well defined. This study aimed to evaluate the UPCs in humeral head in primary shoulder replacement and to understand if UPCs increase in patients with risk factors for contamination (previous surgery or infiltrations). METHODS: Patients undergoing total shoulder replacement were enrolled in this prospective observational study. To reduce the risk of humeral head contamination, all known procedures to reduce Cutibacterium acnes burden of the skin were implemented. Patients were divided into 2 groups, namely, patients who had undergone previous rotator cuff repair or infiltration and patients with no risk factors for contamination. All the humeral heads harvested were treated with dl-dithiothreitol, in a specific device (MicroDTTect), to increase the sensitivity of the cultures for bacterial identification. The cultures were analyzed for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria for up to 14 days. RESULTS: The UPCs' positivity rate of the 80 patients in the study was 19% (15 patients). The positivity rates for UPCs in the group with and without risk factors were 30% (12 patients) and 7.5% (3 patients), respectively. The rate of positive culture was higher in men (87%) than in women (13%). The observed positivity was due to C acnes and Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus, both slow-growing anaerobes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with previous surgery or infiltrations had a 4-fold higher rate of positivity for UPCs compared with patients without previous risk factors. The higher percentage of positivity in patients with risk factors could be related to changes in the joint microenvironment after shoulder procedures. We do not know whether the presence of UPCs could be associated with the development of periprosthetic infections at longer follow-up.

Long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty using a smaller head combined with rotator cuff reconstruction in patients with cuff-tear arthropathy.

Background: Hemiarthroplasty (HHR) using a smaller head with rotator cuff reconstruction is a treatment option for cuff-tear arthropathy, offering advantages like facilitating rotator cuff-tear closure, increasing the lever arm of deltoid, and restoring function in irreparable cuff tears. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of this procedure. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 91 shoulders undergoing HHR using a smaller head with rotator cuff reconstruction between May 2005 and September 2012. Surgery involved reducing the size of humeral head and performing rotator cuff reconstruction based on the site of the deficient rotator cuff. The study analyzed University of California, Los Angeles shoulder scores, Japanese Orthopaedics Association shoulder scores, range of motion, and postoperative radiographs. Results: Twenty-eight patients, divided into an elderly group (14 women, 2 men, mean age 74.5 ± 3.8 years) and a younger group (6 women, 6 men, mean age 63.5 ± 3.1 years) were followed up for a mean of 133.2 ± 14.1 months. No complications were reported. The clinical scores and range of motion significantly improved postoperatively and remained over 10 years. Radiographs revealed high incidence of glenoid wear (82.1%), bone resorption (43%) and cranial humeral head migration (54%), with no prosthesis loosening. Conclusion: We believe that HHR using a smaller head with rotator cuff reconstruction is a surgical technique that can maintain stable long-term outcomes in both elderly and younger individuals with cuff-tear arthropathy.

No difference in 10-year survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty vs. hemiarthroplasty for avascular necrosis of the humeral head.

BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is characterized by osteonecrosis secondary to disrupted blood flow to the glenohumeral joint. Following collapse of the humeral head, arthroplasty, namely, total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or humeral head arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty), is recommended standard of care. The literature is limited to underpowered and small sample sizes in comparing arthroplasty modalities. Therefore, the aims of this study were (1) to compare the 10-year survivorship of TSA and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of AVN of the humeral head and (2) to identify differences in their revision etiologies. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary TSA and hemiarthroplasty for AVN were identified using the PearlDiver database. TSA patients were matched by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to the hemiarthroplasty cohort in a 4:1 ratio because TSA patients were generally older, sicker, and more often female. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of all-cause revision was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard modeling. χ2 analysis was conducted to compare the indications for revisions between matched cohorts including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, mechanical loosening, broken implants, periprosthetic fracture, and stiffness. RESULTS: In total, 4825 patients undergoing TSA and 1969 patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for AVN were included in this study. The unmatched 10-year cumulative incidence of revision for patients who underwent TSA and hemiarthroplasty was 7.0% and 7.7%, respectively. The matched 10-year cumulative incidence of revision for patients who underwent TSA and hemiarthroplasty was 6.7% and 8.0%, respectively. When comparing the unmatched cohorts, TSA patients were at significantly higher risk of 10-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.39; P = .017) when compared to hemiarthroplasty patients. After matching, there was no significant difference in risk of 10-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.29; P = .148) and no difference in the observed etiologies for revision (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSION: After controlling for confounders, only 6.7% of TSA and 8.0% hemiarthroplasties for humeral head AVN were revised within 10 years of index surgery. The demonstrated high and comparable long-term survivorship for both modalities supports the utilization of either for the AVN induced humeral head collapse.

The Kouvalchouk procedure vs. distal tibial allograft for treatment of posterior shoulder instability: the deltoid "hammock" effect exists.

BACKGROUND: In 1993, Kouvalchouk described an acromial bone block with a pedicled deltoid flap for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. This procedure provides a "double blocking" effect in that the acromial autograft restores posterior glenoid bone loss and the deltoid flap functions as a muscular "hammock" resembling the sling effect of the conjoint in the Latarjet procedure. The primary aim of this study was to compare the Kouvalchouk procedure to distal tibial allograft (DTA) reconstruction for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss, while the secondary aim was to evaluate the deltoid hammock effect. METHODS: Ten upper extremity cadavers were evaluated using a validated shoulder testing apparatus in 0° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Testing was first performed on the normal shoulder state and was followed by the creation of a 20% posterior glenoid defect. Subsequently, the Kouvalchouk and DTA procedures were conducted. Forces of 0N, 5N, 10N, and 15N were applied to the posterior deltoid tendinous insertion on the Kouvalchouk graft along the physiological muscle line-of-action to evaluate the 'hammock" effect of this procedure. Testing was additionally performed on the Kouvalchouk bone graft with the deltoid muscle sectioned from its bony attachment. For all test states, a posteriorly directed force was applied to the humeral head perpendicular to the direction of the glenoid bone defect, with the associated translation quantified using an optical tracking system. The outcome variable was posterior translation of the humeral head at an applied force magnitude of 30N. RESULTS: The Kouvalchouk procedure with the loaded deltoid flap (10N: P = .039 and 15N: P < .001) was significantly better at reducing posterior humeral head translation than the DTA. Overall, increased glenohumeral stability was observed with increased force applied to the posterior deltoid flap in the Kouvalchouk procedure. The 15 N Kouvalchouk was most effective at preventing posterior humeral translation, and the difference was statistically significant compared with the 20% glenoid defect (P = .003), detached Kouvalchouk (P < .001), and 0N Kouvalchouk (P < .001). The 15 N Kouvalchouk procedure restored posterior shoulder joint stability to near normal levels, such that it was not significantly different from the intact state (P = .203). CONCLUSIONS: The Kouvalchouk procedure with load applied to the deltoid was found to be biomechanically superior to the DTA for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss. Additionally, the results confirmed the presence and effectiveness of the deltoid "hammock" effect.

Bulk osteochondral allograft for massive Hill-Sachs defect combined with Latarjet procedure for bipolar bone loss in anterior instability.

A proportion of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability present with bipolar bone loss comprising large Hill-Sachs lesions and substantial glenoid defect. These are surgically difficult cases to treat. We describe a novel surgical procedure of bulk size-matched osteochondral allograft reconstruction for massive Hill-Sachs lesions combined with the Latarjet procedure for these challenging cases.

Vara Deformity and Subluxed Humeral Heads: An Unusual Sign in Pseudohypoparathyroidism.

Pseudohypoparathyroidism is a rare disorder characterized by end-organ resistance to intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) and concomitant laboratory findings of hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia. Radiologic evidence of the disease may manifest as a variety of bone abnormalities. This case describes an 11-year-old female with a history of repaired bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis who presented with a limited range of motion of the bilateral upper extremities. Laboratory findings were consistent with pseudohypoparathyroidism. Radiographs revealed subchondral resorption of bilateral clavicular heads and multiple ribs and band lucencies of proximal humeral metaphyses, along with vara deformity and inferior subluxation of the humeral heads. This presentation adds to the spectrum of potential radiographic manifestations of pseudohypoparathyroidism.