Comparative Effectiveness of Dupilumab and Omalizumab on Asthma Exacerbations and Systemic Corticosteroid Prescriptions: Real-World US ADVANTAGE Study.

BACKGROUND: In the US, dupilumab is approved for moderate-to-severe eosinophilic or oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma, while omalizumab is approved for managing moderate-to-severe allergic asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids. However, limited comparative effectiveness data exist for these biologics due to differing patient characteristics and treatment histories. OBJECTIVE: This analysis assessed the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab for asthma among patients in the US. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, TriNetX Dataworks electronic medical record data were used to identify asthma patients (age: ≥12 years) who initiated (index) dupilumab or omalizumab between November 2018 and September 2020, and who had at least 12 months of pre- and post-index clinical information. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance potential confounding in treatment groups. Asthma exacerbation rates and systemic corticosteroid (SCS) prescriptions were compared using a doubly robust negative binomial regression model, adjusting for baseline exacerbation/SCS rates and patient characteristics with ≥10% standardized differences after IPTW. RESULTS: Overall, 2,138 patients in dupilumab and 1,313 in omalizumab treatment groups met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. After weighting, the majority of baseline characteristics were balanced (standard difference <10%) between the two groups. Dupilumab was associated with a 44% lower asthma exacerbation rate (p<0.0001) than omalizumab. Additionally, dupilumab treatment significantly (p<0.05) reduced SCS prescriptions by 28% during the follow-up period compared to omalizumab treatment. CONCLUSION: The US ADVANTAGE real-world study demonstrated a significant reduction in severe asthma exacerbations and SCS prescriptions for patients prescribed dupilumab compared to those prescribed omalizumab during 12 months of follow-up.

Increased Pneumonia Risk Associated with Concomitant Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Benzodiazepines: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are effective in managing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but increase the risk of pneumonia. Benzodiazepines (BZD), commonly prescribed for comorbid psychiatric disorders in asthma or COPD patients, are also associated with pneumonia. This study investigates the risk of pneumonia associated with the concomitant use of ICS and BZD. METHODS: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from Q4 2013 to Q3 2023 were extracted. Reports involving asthma or COPD patients were included. Disproportionality analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the risk of pneumonia associated with the combined use of ICS and BZD. Additive and multiplicative models were used to further confirm the results. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted based on gender, age, and disease type. RESULTS: A total of 238,411 reports were included. The combined use of ICS and BZD was associated with a higher reporting of pneumonia (ROR: 2.41, 95% CI 2.25-2.58). Using additive and multiplicative methods, the results remained significant. The strongest risk signals were observed in specific drug combinations, such as mometasone with clonazepam, budesonide with temazepam, and mometasone with zopiclone. Subgroup analyses showed higher pneumonia risks in females, patients over 60 years old, and those with asthma. CONCLUSION: Our findings identified a significantly elevated pneumonia risk with the combined use of ICS and BZD. These results highlighted the necessity for cautious co-prescription of ICS and BZD and suggested the need for more comprehensive clinical studies to assess this interaction.

Systemic Adverse Events Associated with Locally Administered Corticosteroids.

Topical corticosteroids are a mainstay in the treatment of many pediatric disorders. While they have proven beneficial therapeutic effects and are generally considered safe, systemic adverse events may occur. This study presents four cases of children who experienced systemic adverse events after using inhaled and intranasal topical corticosteroids, as well as topical corticosteroids in other forms. A comprehensive literature review was performed to explore the existing evidence on this topic. The aim of this study is to raise awareness among healthcare providers about the possibility of systemic adverse events associated with the use of locally administered corticosteroids in pediatric patients. This information underscores the importance of careful monitoring, individualized treatment plans, and further research to better understand and mitigate the risks associated with corticosteroids, even those not given systemically.

Dupilumab Efficacy in Children With Type 2 Asthma Receiving High/Medium-Dose ICS (VOYAGE).

BACKGROUND: In phase 3 VOYAGE (NCT02948959), dupilumab showed clinical efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in children (6-11 years) with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma (blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/µL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥20 ppb). OBJECTIVE: We analyzed dupilumab's efficacy in children with type 2 asthma by high- or medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at baseline. METHODS: Children were randomized to receive add-on dupilumab 100/200 mg (by body-weight ≤30 kg/>30 kg) every 2 weeks or placebo for 52 weeks and stratified by high- or medium-dose ICS at baseline. Endpoints were annualized severe exacerbation rate, changes from baseline in percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) and 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire - Interviewer Administered (ACQ-7-IA) score, proportions of ACQ-7-IA responders (improvement ≥0.5), and biomarker changes. RESULTS: In children receiving high- (n = 152) or medium- (n = 195) dose ICS at baseline, dupilumab versus placebo reduced severe exacerbation rates by 63% (P < .001) and 59% (P = .003), respectively. At week 52, dupilumab improved ppFEV1 by least squares mean difference versus placebo of 5.7 percentage points (P = .02) and 9.35 points (P < .001), and reduced ACQ-7-IA scores by 0.53 points (P < .001) and 0.40 points (P < .001), respectively. No significant treatment interactions between ICS subgroups were detected at week 52. Significant improvements were observed in ACQ-7-IA responder rates and most type 2 biomarker levels. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab reduced severe exacerbation rates and improved lung function and asthma control in children with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma, regardless of ICS dose at baseline.

Elevated Fracture Risks in Patients Using Inhaled Corticosteroids: A Korean Nationwide Study.

Background: In this comprehensive retrospective nationwide cohort study, we examined the relationships between various asthma medications and bone health, utilizing data from the National Health Insurance Service database of South Korea. Methods: From 2015 to 2019, the relevant dataset included 168,611 individuals aged 66 years, among whom 8,747 were diagnosed with asthma. We focused on a subset of 6,173 patients, all 66-year-old women. Participants were categorized into four groups: nonusers of asthma medication (n=2,868), leukotriene antagonist users (n=2,281), inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) users (n=517), and those using a combination of ICS and long-acting beta-agonist (ICS+LABA) medication (n=507). The primary outcomes measured were the incidences of major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures during the follow-up period. Results: Over 2.7 years of follow-up, 615 cases of major osteoporotic fractures and 96 cases of hip fractures were recorded. ICS users exhibited a heightened risk of both injuries, with hazard ratios of 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.63; P<0.001) for major osteoporotic fractures and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.33 to 1.83; P<0.001) for hip fractures. Similarly elevated risks were observed in the ICS+LABA group. Notably, the risk associated with ICS was particularly pronounced among patients with osteopenia for both fracture types. Overall, the use of ICS, alone or in combination with LABA, in patients with asthma is associated with significantly increased risks of osteoporotic fractures, especially among those with osteopenia. Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of considering bone health when managing asthma, especially in older patients and those with existing bone density issues.

Impact of Ongoing Treatment With Inhaled Corticosteroids During Specific Inhalation Challenges for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Specific inhalation challenge (SIC) tests are still the reference test for diagnosing sensitizer-induced occupational asthma (SIOA). The European Respiratory Society recommends the cessation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) 72 hours before SIC. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of an ongoing ICS treatment during SIC on the maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the change in methacholine provocative concentration of methacholine inducing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), and sputum eosinophil counts after exposure to the suspected agent. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using a database of cases referred to our center for suspected SIOA from 1999 to 2022. The results of the SIC were compared between subjects treated with ICS during SIC and steroid-naïve subjects. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy-one individuals underwent SIC in the laboratory. Three hundred and eighteen were treated with ICS, whereas 353 were steroid naïve. The proportion of subjects with a positive SIC was greater among ICS-treated subjects (39. 6%) compared with steroid-naïve subjects (27.5%, P < .001). A treatment with ICS did not influence the outcome of the SIC. There was no difference in the change in PC20 or the percentage of sputum eosinophils after SIC between steroid-treated and steroid-naïve subjects. CONCLUSIONS: An ongoing ICS treatment during an SIC did not affect the occurrence of an asthmatic reaction, the change in airway responsiveness, or eosinophilic inflammation after exposure to the suspected agent in subjects who have been treated with ICS for a long period of time.

Association between asthma and COVID-19 severity during Omicron epidemic: a retrospective cohort study using real-world data.

BACKGROUND: The available evidence presented inconsistencies and inconclusive findings regarding the associations between co-existing asthma and mortality among COVID-19 patients. The objective of the current study is to investigate the relationship between asthma and severe outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in an infection-naïve population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching was conducted. The COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalisation in Hong Kong from January 1, 2022, to November 13, 2022, an Omicron-predominated period, were identified. Severe clinical outcomes were defined as ICU admission and inpatient death after the first positive PCR results as well as a composite outcome of both. RESULTS: Of the 74,396 hospitalised COVID-19 patients admitted, 1,290 asthma patients and 18,641 non-asthma patients were included in the matched cohort. The rates of death and the composite outcome were 15·3% and 17·2%, respectively, among the non-asthma patients,12·2% and 13·6%, respectively, among the asthma patients, with adjusted hazard ratios equal to 0·775 (95% CI: 0·660-0·909) and 0·770 (95% CI: 0·662-0·895), respectively. The negative association was more apparent in the elderly and female groups. Asthma remained a factor that lowered the risk of disease severity even though the patients were not fully vaccinated with at least two doses. CONCLUSIONS: We used real-world data to demonstrate that asthma was not a risk factor for COVID-19 severity of the infections of Omicron variant, even though the patients were not fully vaccinated.

Differences in the effectiveness of single, dual, and triple inhaled corticosteroid therapy for reducing future risk of severe asthma exacerbation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Importance: The effectiveness of different combinations of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapies in reducing severe exacerbations of adult asthma remains unclear. Objective: This network meta-analysis (NMA) extensively evaluated the treatment effects of single ICS; dual ICS i.e., ICS/long-acting ß2-adrenergic agonists (LABA); ICS/LABA as single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART); and triple ICS, i.e., ICS/LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in preventing severe asthma exacerbations. Data sources: A systematic search of English databases, including PubMed and Web of Science, was conducted until December 31, 2022, using PRISMA-NMA. Study selection: Using the PICOS criteria, the questions for this study were carefully selected so that the correct keywords could be identified. Data extraction and synthesis: A pairwise meta-analysis was used to select trials based on the criteria for minimizing heterogeneity (I2). Subsequently, the "BUGSnet" package of R software was used to perform a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures were risk rate and annualized rate ratio of severe asthma exacerbations. Results: This review included 56 randomized control trials (RCTs; n = 78,171 patients). As the pairwise meta-analysis demonstrated that the annualized rate ratio of severe asthma exacerbation had moderate heterogeneity, we analyzed the risk rate of severe asthma exacerbation using a network meta-analysis. In terms of direct/indirect comparisons with non-ICS, single ICS, dual ICS, SMART, and triple ICS reduced severe asthma exacerbations by 34 %, 47 %, 58 %, and 57 %, respectively. SMART and triple ICS showed high effectiveness in reducing severe exacerbations. Conclusion: AND RELEVANCE: SMART and triple ICS were ranked higher in effectiveness in reducing severe asthma exacerbations in comparison with other therapies, indicating that these are the most effective treatments for reducing the future risk of severe asthma exacerbations.

Rethinking Blood Eosinophils for Assessing ICS Response in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis From FLAME.

BACKGROUND: The varied treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD and the increased risk of pneumonia necessitate a personalized ICS therapeutic approach. This is informed by blood eosinophil count (BEC), which predicts ICS treatment response. However, BEC appears to change in response to ICS treatment. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does BEC measured on or off ICS treatment, or the change in BEC during ICS treatment, best predict treatment response to ICS in COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: FLAME, a 52-week, double-blind randomized controlled trial compared long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) with LABA/ICS. Corticosteroids were prohibited during a 4-week run-in period. We chose patients previously on ICS, thereby allowing pre-run-in and post-run-in period BEC to represent BEC on and off ICS, respectively. In this post hoc analysis, we revisited outcome data, exploring how the three BEC biomarkers interacted with treatment response to the ICS-containing regimen. RESULTS: Our study confirms that LABA/LAMA combination is superior, or at least noninferior, to LABA/ICS in curbing exacerbations for most FLAME participants. However, higher BEC off ICS and BEC on ICS and significant BEC suppression during ICS treatment corresponded to superior response to LABA/ICS in terms of exacerbation rate, time to first exacerbation, and time to first pneumonia. In a subgroup, including 9% of participants, BEC changed significantly during ICS treatment (≥ 200 cells/µL), and higher BEC on ICS did not predict ICS treatment response. For these patients, BEC off ICS and BEC change proved more predictive. Excess pneumonia risk associated with ICS appeared to be confined to patients who do not benefit from this treatment. BEC was not predictive of treatment effects on lung function and health status. INTERPRETATION: This exploratory analysis advocates preferentially using BEC off ICS or BEC change during ICS treatment for guiding ICS treatment decisions. BEC measured on ICS is less predictive of treatment response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01782326; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Effect of Added Inhaled Corticosteroids to Systemic Steroids on COPD Exacerbation Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: COPD exacerbations are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have a role as long-term treatment, their efficacy in exacerbations, particularly as an adjunct to systemic steroids, remains unclear. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data from 870 subjects admitted with COPD exacerbations to a tertiary medical center in Israel from January 2018-January 2023. We investigated the impact of adding ICS to standard systemic steroid treatment on hospital length of stay, intubation rates, and 30-d mortality using propensity score matching to account for confounders. RESULTS: The cohort, after matching, included 354 subjects treated with systemic steroids and ICS and 121 treated with systemic steroids alone. All characteristics were similar between the groups. Our analysis showed no differences in 30-d mortality (7.1% vs 5.8%, P = .63) or secondary outcomes (intubation, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates) between the groups. Subgroup analyses based on different eosinophil levels did not alter these findings. In multivariate analysis among the general cohort, eosinophil count < 150 cells/µL (adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.87], P = .02) and high Charlson score (adjusted odds ratio 1.19 [95% CI 1.02-1.37], P = .02) were independent predictors for 30-d mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the known benefits of ICS in managing chronic COPD, we did not find an added value of ICS to systemic steroids in exacerbations. These results underscore the necessity for individualized treatment strategies and further research into the role of ICS in COPD exacerbations.

Prescriptions of respiratory medications in children aged 0-10 years: A longitudinal drug utilization study in the POMME database.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory tract disorders are common in children. However, there is no available data on the prescription of respiratory medications for children in France. This study aimed to provide an overview of medications for obstructive airway diseases prescriptions for children during the initial ten years of their lives within POMME, a French population-based cohort of children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This longitudinal, population-based study used data from the French POMME birth cohort, comprising children born in Haute Garonne between July 2010 and June 2011. Anonymous medical information, including medication reimbursement data, was collected between ages 0 and 10 years. Exposure was defined as at least one prescription for respiratory medications (ATC code R03*), focusing on specific subclasses. Data were analyzed by age, season, and prescribing physicians' specialties. RESULTS: Out of 5956 children, 4951 (83.1 %) received respiratory medication prescriptions. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) were the most prescribed (95.3 %), followed by short-acting ß2-agonists (68.8 %). The number of prescriptions increased with age, except for ICSs alone, which peaked between 6 months and 2 years. The average number of prescriptions per child was relatively low. DISCUSSION: This study highlighted high prescription rates of respiratory medications in children under 10 years, with ICSs being the most prevalent. While these medications are primarily intended for asthma management, the findings suggested a significant proportion of off-label prescriptions, especially in young children. Further research and clinical guidance are warranted to ensure appropriate medication use in the pediatric population.

Very long-term data on patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab: a case series.

Background: Patients with severe asthma are often dependent on oral corticosteroids (OCS) and have frequent exacerbations. This article aims to report very long-term data of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma assessing asthma control, lung function, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose reduction, and clinical and biological parameters of patients treated with mepolizumab. Methods: Four cases of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were treated for 60 months or more with mepolizumab 100 mg/4 weeks, leading to the stable discontinuation of OCS, are presented. ICS dose, OCS dose and withdrawal date, lung function, eosinophil count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and asthma control test were recorded as well as exacerbations in the 12 months before commencing mepolizumab and in the 12 months before the last follow-up visit. Results: Three of the patients were men, median age was 52.5 years (range 79-53), median length of asthma before mepolizumab start was 67.5 months (range 24-240), three had chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis and two were atopic. All had eosinophil counts >300 cells/µL at baseline. The median follow-up was 73.5 months (range 71-74), and OCS withdrawal from baseline occurred after a median of 13 months of mepolizumab treatment (range 12-39). A substantial reduction of ICS treatment was registered as well as improvement in asthma control test, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and functional parameters, and a significant reduction of exacerbations in the last 12 months before last visit was observed as compared to the 12 months before baseline (from a median of 4 (range 3-6) to 0; p=0.0286). Conclusions: Mepolizumab could be a 'disease-modifying' agent, with high tolerability and a good efficacy profile in the long term.

Guardian's knowledge and attitude towards inhaled corticosteroids aerosol therapy and medication compliance of children with wheezing diseases.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are widely used in inhalation aerosol therapy for wheezing diseases. This study aims to explore guardians' knowledge and attitude towards inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) aerosol therapy and the medication compliance of children with wheezing diseases in China. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled guardians of children with wheezing diseases at the First Hospital Affiliated to Shaoyang College between October 2022 and February 2023. A self-administered questionnaire was developed to collect demographic information of the participants and evaluate their knowledge and attitude towards ICS aerosol therapy. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale was used to assess the medication compliance of children. RESULTS: A total of 506 valid questionnaires were collected. 260 (51.38%) participants were guardians of a ≤ 3-year-old child and 327 (64.62%) were children's mothers. The knowledge, attitude, and medication compliance scores of all participants were 12.61 ± 5.78, 20.95 ± 2.37, and 4.69 ± 2.18, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression showed that knowledge scores [OR = 1.053, 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.017-1.090, P = 0.003], attitude scores (OR = 1.121, 95% CI: 1.030-1.219, P = 0.008), guardians of children aged 4-6 years (OR = 0.385, 95% CI: 0.242-0.612, P < 0.001), and grandparents of children (OR = 2.633, 95% CI: 1.104-6.275, P = 0.029) were independently associated with children's medication compliance. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, guardians of children with wheezing diseases in China had insufficient knowledge, unsatisfactory attitude, and poor medication compliance towards ICS aerosol therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Comparing Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) Using LAMA versus LABA/ICS at Treatment Initiation for COPD: Findings from CITRUS (Comparing the Incidence of Tiotropium and ICS/LABA in Real-World Use in South Korea) Study.

Background: COPD causes substantial economic burden on healthcare. Alternative treatment strategies for COPD can be associated with different costs dependent upon their relative safety and effectiveness. We compared costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with LAMA or LABA/ICS initiation. Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we enrolled COPD patients initiating treatment with LAMA or LABA/ICS between January 2005 and April 2015. Propensity score matched individuals were compared on all-cause and COPD-related medical costs and HCRU over a three-year follow-up period. Results: A total of 2444 patients were enrolled in each treatment group. LAMA group was associated with significantly lower costs than LABA/ICS group, both in all-cause (403.08 vs 474.50 USD per patient per month [PPPM], cost ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.10-1.26, p<0.0001) and COPD-related (216.37 vs 267.32 USD PPPM, cost ratio 1.24, 95% CI=1.13-1.35, p<0.0001) medical costs. All-cause HCRU was not significantly different between groups, while COPD-related HRCU was higher in LAMA group (0.66 vs 0.60 medical visits PPPM, p<0.0001). Conclusion: COPD patients initiating treatment with LAMA were associated with lower all-cause and COPD-related medical costs than those starting with LABA/ICS despite the similar all-cause HCRU and higher COPD-related HCRU. Initiation with LAMA is a cost-efficient option for the treatment of COPD.

Outpatient inhaled corticosteroid use in bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

RATIONALE: In the outpatient setting, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are frequently given to children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) for treatment of respiratory and asthma-associated symptoms. In this study we sought to determine if correlations existed between ICS use and ICS initiation and patient characteristics and outpatient respiratory outcomes. METHODS: This study included children with the diagnosis of BPD (n = 661) who were seen in outpatient pulmonary clinics at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia between 2016 and 2021. Chart review was used to determine patient demographics, use and timing of ICS initiation, asthma diagnosis, and acute care usage following initial hospital discharge. RESULTS: At the first pulmonary visit, 9.2% of children had been prescribed an ICS at NICU discharge, 13.9% had been prescribed an ICS after NICU discharge but before their first pulmonary appointment, and 6.9% were prescribed an ICS at the completion of initial pulmonary visit. Children started on an ICS as outpatients had a higher likelihood of ER visits (adjusted odds ratio: 2.68 ± 0.7), hospitalizations (4.81 ± 1.16), and a diagnosis of asthma (3.58 ± 0.84), compared to children never on an ICS. Of those diagnosed with asthma, children prescribed an ICS in the outpatient setting received the diagnosis at an earlier age. No associations between NICU BPD severity scores and ICS use were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies an outpatient BPD phenotype associated with ICS use and ICS initiation independent of NICU severity score. Additionally, outpatient ICS initiation correlates with a subsequent diagnosis of asthma and acute care usage in children with BPD.

Assessing the impact of long-term inhaled corticosteroid therapy on patients with COVID-19 and coexisting chronic lung disease: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Background: Patients with chronic lung disease (CLD), such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were expected to have an increased risk of clinical manifestations and severity of COVID-19. However, these comorbidities have been reported less frequently than expected. Chronic treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may impact the clinical course of COVID-19. The main objective of this study is to know the influence of chronic treatment with ICS on the prognosis of COVID-19 hospitalized patients with CLD. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was designed, including patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected at admission and at seven days, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients with CLD with and without chronic treatment with ICS were compared. Results: Two thousand five hundred ninety-eight patients were included, of which 1,171 patients had a diagnosis of asthma and 1,427 of COPD (53.37% and 41.41% with ICS, respectively). No differences were found in mortality, transfer to ICU, or development of moderate-severe ARDS. Patients with chronic ICS had a longer hospital stay in both asthma and COPD patients (9 vs. 8 days, p = 0.031 in asthma patients), (11 vs. 9 days, p = 0.018 in COPD patients); although they also had more comorbidity burden. Conclusions: Patients with chronic inhaled corticosteroids had longer hospital stays and more chronic comorbidities, measured by the Charlson comorbidity index, but they did not have more severe disease at admission, evaluated with qSOFA and PSI scores. Chronic treatment with inhaled corticosteroids had no influence on the prognosis of patients with chronic lung disease and COVID-19.