Advances in the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the role of frontline immunotherapy-based regimens.

Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) are both active in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and improve outcomes compared with conventional chemotherapy in this setting. Several prospective clinical trials have explored the use of these agents in adults with newly diagnosed B-cell ALL, with promising outcomes observed in younger and older adults and in both Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL. These novel regimens result in high rates of deep measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity and may improve survival compared with chemotherapy-only approaches, allowing for less reliance on intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This review discusses novel approaches to integrating INO and/or blinatumomab into frontline ALL regimens, including the potential role of chemotherapy-free regimens in some subgroups. The role of MRD monitoring is also discussed, including how this can inform decisions for consolidative allogeneic HSCT or investigational approaches with CD19 CAR T-cells.

MRD in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL: Methodologies and Clinical Implications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Measurable residual disease (MRD) is integral in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This review discusses the current methods used to evaluate MRD as well as the interpretation, significance, and incorporation of MRD in current practice. RECENT FINDINGS: New molecular technologies have allowed the detection of MRD to levels as low as 10- 6. The most used techniques to evaluate MRD are multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS). Each method varies in terms of advantages, disadvantages, and MRD sensitivity. MRD negativity after induction treatment and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an important prognostic marker that has consistently been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. Blinatumomab, a new targeted therapy for Ph + ALL, demonstrates high efficacy in eradicating MRD and improving patient outcomes. In the relapsed/refractory setting, the use of inotuzumab ozogamicin and tisagenlecleucel has shown promise in eradicating MRD. The presence of MRD has become an important predictive measure in Ph + ALL. Current studies evaluate the use of MRD in treatment decisions, especially in expanding therapeutic options for Ph + ALL, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, targeted antibody therapies, chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy, and HCT.

Treatment of Relapsed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia in Adult Patients.

OPINION STATEMENT: For adult patients diagnosed with relapsed B cell-ALL (B-ALL), there have been significant improvements in available treatment options following the FDA approval of novel cellular and immunotherapy approaches - blinatumomab, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy, and inotuzumab. For the last several years, research has focused on gaining a better understanding of the effects of specific disease and patient characteristics on long-term outcomes with each of the FDA-approved agents. In combination with the better prevention and management of unique, treatment-specific toxicities, providers can now select the best available treatment option for each individual patient diagnosed with relapsed, adult B-ALL needing therapy. This has allowed more patients to proceed to consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and long-term data has even brought into question the need for HSCT for long-term durable remission for all patients. However, with the adoption of blinatumomab, CAR T therapy, and inotuzumab in front-line treatment regimens, it remains unclear what effects this will have on patients with relapsed B-ALL following exposure to these novel cellular and immunotherapy therapies. Unlike B-ALL, similar advances have unfortunately not yet been realized in T cell-ALL (T-ALL). Currently, new therapeutic approaches are underway to utilize similar targeting strategies that have been successful in B-ALL - monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE), and CAR T therapy. Like B-ALL, the only existing approved therapy for relapsed T-ALL, nelarabine, is now used in the upfront treatment setting potentially limiting its utility in relapsed disease. Over the next several years, the hope is for patients diagnosed with T-ALL to experience the drastic improvement in outcomes as has been seen for patients diagnosed with B-ALL over the last decade.

Successful treatment of two cases with Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and the treatments with novel immunotherapies and ponatinib.

The outcomes of relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) resistant to new drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) and blinatumomab are dismal. We treated two cases of Ph+ALL resistant to these drugs that achieved long-term survival after treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy or a second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) with a sequential conditioning regimen. Case 1: A 15-year-old boy was diagnosed with Ph+ALL. Despite the second HCT after the treatment of ponatinib and blinatumomab, hematological relapse occurred. InO was ineffective and he was transferred to a CAR-T center. After the CAR-T cell therapy, negative measurable residual disease (MRD) was achieved and maintained for 38 months without maintenance therapy. Case 2: A 21-year-old man was diagnosed with Ph+ALL. Hematological relapse occurred after the first HCT. Despite of the treatment with InO, ponatinib, and blinatumomab, hematological remission was not achieved. The second HCT was performed using a sequential conditioning regimen with clofarabine. Negative MRD was subsequently achieved and maintained for 42 months without maintenance therapy. These strategies are suggestive and helpful to treat Ph+ALL resistant to multiple immunotherapies.

How I treat newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Treatment algorithms differ for adult patients with Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) and Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For Ph- ALL intensive induction-consolidation chemotherapy using "pediatric-inspired" protocols is a standard of care. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from either an HLA-matched sibling, unrelated or haploidentical donor should be considered for patients with high estimated risk of relapse. Inadequate response at the level of measurable residual disease (MRD) is the strongest adverse prognostic factor. Patients with B-ALL and detectable MRD should be treated with blinatumomab. In the future, the use of blinatumomab and/or inotuzumab ozogamycin in addition to first-line chemotherapy may become a new standard of care reducing the role of allo-HCT. For patients with Ph+ ALL, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the most important components of treatment protocols, while the intensity of chemotherapy may be reduced. Allo-HCT is recommended for all patients treated with imatinib along with low-intensity chemotherapy. Results of phase-II studies using front-line dasatinib or ponatinib in sequence or in combination with blinatumomab are very promising. Such a strategy may allow the avoidance of systemic chemotherapy. The future role of allo-HCT in this context appears uncertain.

[Sequential therapy with inotuzumab ozogamicin followed by CAR T-cell therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

A 25-year-old woman with a history of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia over ten years ago was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of leukoblastosis. She was participating in a JPLSG (Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group) clinical study at that time. We diagnosed ALL relapse by multi-color flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow samples at admission, with reference to previous JPLSG data. Because her leukemic cells were resistant to conventional cytotoxic agents, she proceeded to lymphocyte apheresis for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T, Tisagenlecleucel [Tisa-cel]). She received two cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin as a bridging therapy to Tisa-cel, resulting in a hematological complete remission (minimal residual disease measured by polymerase chain reaction [PCR-MRD] was positive at 1.0×10-4). She was finally administered Tisa-cel and achieved MRD negativity. She is currently in complete remission with careful MRD monitoring. This strategy of sequential bi-targeted therapy combining antibody conjugates and CAR-T cells provides tumor control in deeper remission and minimal damage to organ function through reduced use of cytotoxic anti-tumor agents. Therefore, we believe that this therapeutic strategy is an effective and rational treatment for adolescent and young adult ALL patients.

Immune therapies of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and adults.

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-cell ALL) is a common haematologic cancer in children and adults. About 10 percent of children and 50 percent of adults fail to achieve a histological complete remission or subsequently relapse despite current anti-leukaemia drug therapies and/or haematopoietic cell transplants. Several new immune therapies including monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cells are proved safe and effective in this setting. We review data on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immune therapies for B-cell ALL in children and adults including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel, and brexucabtagene autoleucel. We also summarize pharmaco-dynamics, pharmaco-kinetics, and pharmaco-economics of these interventions.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Novel Agents and the Diminishing Role of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Outcomes of patients with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have improved remarkably in the past decade. This has largely been due to the development and introduction of novel immunotherapies such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, highly potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and improved risk stratification, including better understanding of high risk genomic subgroups and better methods of measurable residual disease (MRD) detection. Historically, allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) has been the consolidative treatment of choice in first complete remission for fit adults with B-ALL. However, allo-SCT is associated with significant treatment-related mortality and morbidity. Current research is directed at the incorporation of novel immunotherapies into frontline regimens to improve depth and durability of responses and ultimately increase cure rates. In this review, we will discuss the emerging role of novel immune-based treated strategies in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. We present our approach to newly diagnosed patients with B-ALL and illustrate how the incorporation of novel agents and use of high-sensitivity MRD assays can abrogate the need for allo-SCT in most patients with B-ALL.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Next Questions: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

The integration of immune and targeted therapies into the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has significantly improved outcomes, reduced the intensity and duration of chemotherapy, and the reliance on allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In younger patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative ALL, treatment with Hyper-CVAD and blinatumomab +/- inotuzumab has improved the 3-year overall survival (OS) to above 85%. In older patients, using less intensive chemotherapy (mini-Hyper-CVD) in combination with inotuzumab and blinatumomab has improved the 5-year OS rate to 50%. In Ph+ ALL, the chemotherapy-free combinations of blinatumomab and ponatinib (or dasatinib) have become a new standard of care resulting in 3-year OS of 85% to 90%. Because the methotrexate-cytarabine courses were omitted in the nonchemotherapy regimens, central nervous system (CNS) relapses were noted, particularly in patients with a WBC count > 70 × 109/L, requiring to consider increasing the number of prophylactic intrathecals (from 12 to 15) and perhaps developing a CNS risk-directed high-dose systemic chemotherapy. In relapsed/refractory ALL, a dose-dense regimen integrating blinatumomab and inotuzumab with low-intensity chemotherapy followed by consolidation with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is being investigated. The detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) following ALL therapy is predictive of disease relapse. Using next-generation sequencing allows the detection of MRD at 1 × 10-6 which was shown to be superior to multiparameter flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction in predicting relapse, and could be used to decide on the duration of therapy or need to change therapy. Herein, we review the recent updates and areas of unmet need in ALL.

Liver failure after treatment with inotuzumab and polychemotherapy including PEG-asparaginase in a patient with relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We present the case of a 58-year-old female patient who presented with an extramedullary B-ALL relapse after prior allogenic HSCT and blinatumomab therapy. The patient died from complications of a drug-induced acute liver failure after a salvage therapy combining inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO)-based induction followed by consolidation with high dose MTX and pegaspargase based on the GMALL protocol for older ALL patients. After a diagnosis of the extramedullary relapse in the form of a retro vesical chloroma, the patient received an individualized multi-agent chemotherapy based on induction chemotherapy for older patients in combination with InO. After four administrations of InO, in combination with vincristine, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide, CT-imaging showed a reduction in volume of the chloroma and response to therapy. Consolidation with high-dose methotrexate and pegaspargase was administered. The patient developed toxic liver damage manifested by hyperbilirubinemia and progressive hepatic encephalopathy. The diagnostic criteria for VOD were met, and therapy with defibrotide was initiated. Liver biopsy revealed no histological signs of VOD but instead steatohepatitis indicative of drug-induced toxicity. The patient ultimately died of hemorrhagic shock through postinterventional hemorrhage after liver biopsy. In conclusion, although InO shows promising results in the therapy of r/r ALL with and without additional chemotherapy, the combination with MTX and pegaspargase in an intensively pretreated patient with relapse after HCST may impart an increased risk for liver-related toxicity. Special caution is required when assessing fitness for further liver toxic regimens. A key takeaway is also the reminder that InO can cause liver damage not only in the form of VOD but also through direct hepatocellular toxicity.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Approach to Older Adults With Phildadelphia-Chromosome Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Philadelphia-chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has historically been associated with poor outcomes in older patients due to adverse disease biology, as well as inferior tolerance of conventional chemotherapy. Fortunately, novel therapies, including inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, and venetoclax, are now being incorporated into first-line therapy to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity of initial therapy. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, alone or in combination with low intensity chemotherapy, appears to be best suited for the induction phase of treatment due to efficacy in the setting of high tumor burden. In contrast, blinatumomab may be best suited for consolidation due to superior efficacy in setting of morphologic remission, with or without measurable residual disease (MRD). Venetoclax is being investigated in combination with chemotherapy and can be used for treatment of older adults with both B-cell and T-cell ALL. Ongoing trials incorporating inotuzumab, blinatumomab, and venetoclax demonstrate high rates of MRD-negative complete remissions with low early mortality. Long-term outcomes have been less favorable so far, with several trials reporting nonrelapse mortality during subsequent treatment. Unanswered questions remain regarding the optimal treatment of older adults with Ph-neg ALL, including central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, the most appropriate consolidation to minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy, and the role of transplant and cellular therapy. T-cell ALL remains an area of unmet need and effort is required to ensure that therapeutic advances benefit all populations equitably. In this manuscript, we review current data and ongoing trials regarding the treatment of older adults with Ph-neg ALL and define topics for further research.

Preemptive inotuzumab ozogamicin eradicated measurable residual disease in Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapsed post CD19 CART therapy.

There are no reports of application of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) for the treatment of MRD in r/r B-ALL. We firstly report the efficacy of InO for a patient experienced morphological relapse after HSCT and molecular relapse after CART therapy.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel with Alternative Standard Therapies for Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adult Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, is approved for relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults aged 18+/26+ years in the US/European Union (EU), based on efficacy results from the single-arm ZUMA-3 trial. This study aimed to estimate the relative treatment effects of brexu-cel versus inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), blinatumomab (blina), and chemotherapies using unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) methods. METHODS: Individual patient data from ZUMA-3 and published aggregate level data from two randomized controlled trials, INO-VATE (InO versus chemotherapy) and TOWER (blina versus chemotherapy), were used. Patient-level data from ZUMA-3 were weighted to match the mean of the following prognostic variables at baseline, which were pre-specified based on clinical input, for each comparator population: primary refractory disease, duration of first remission < 12 months, prior stem-cell transplantation, age, performance status, salvage status, bone marrow blast, complex karyotype, and Philadelphia chromosome status. The base case analysis was conducted using the modified intention-to-treat population (i.e., received brexu-cel) from ZUMA-3. Relative treatment effects for overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and differences in restricted mean survival time (RMST) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The base case MAIC results suggested brexu-cel improved OS and EFS compared to blina (OS HR 0.46 [95% CI 0.28, 0.75]; EFS HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.25, 0.56]) and pooled INO-VATE/TOWER chemotherapy (OS HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.18, 0.56]; EFS HR 0.27 [0.18, 0.40]). Brexu-cel also improved OS compared to InO (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24, 0.85]). The point estimate for EFS favored brexu-cel over Ino but the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.41, 1.10]). Findings were consistent between the HR and RMST analyses. CONCLUSION: Despite limitations, these MAIC results suggest that brexu-cel may improve OS and EFS versus currently used therapies in this population.

[Relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia responding to retreatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin].

A 72-year-old man with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) was treated with dasatinib (week1: 50 mg/day, week2: 70 mg/day, week3-: 100 mg/day) and prednisolone from June 2017. However, in January 2018, it relapsed with the T315I mutation. Although the treatment was changed to ponatinib 30 mg/day, he experienced a second relapse in June 2018. Following confirmation of CD22 positivity, he was treated with three cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), resulting in CR. He was CR for 2.9 years before relapsing for the third time in May 2021. Because the patient was still CD22-positive, InO was given again, and the patient achieved CR at the end of the second cycle. We had a case where re-administering InO was effective as a salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory Ph+ALL (r/r Ph+ALL) in an elderly patient.

Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Sequential Use for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-Life Campus All Study.

BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab (Blina) and inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) has improved the outcome of relapsed/refractory B-lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, little is known about the outcome after recurrence and re-treatment with immunotherapy. METHODS: We describe 71 R/R B-ALL patients treated for different relapses with Blina and InO. Blina was the first treatment in 57 patients and InO in 14. Twenty-seven patients had a previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). RESULTS: In the Blina/InO group, after Blina, 36 patients (63%) achieved a complete remission (CR), with 42% of negative minimal residual disease (MRD-); after InO, a CR was achieved in 47 patients (82%, 34 MRD-). In the InO/Blina group, after InO, 13 cases (93%) reached a CR (6 MRD-); after Blina, a CR was re-achieved in 6 cases (43%, 3 MRD-). Twenty-six patients proceeded to allo-HSCT. In the Blina/InO group, the median overall survival (OS) was 19 months; the disease-free survival (DFS) after Blina was 7.4 months (11.6 vs. 2.7 months in MRD- vs. MRD+, p = 0.03) and after InO, 5.4 months. In the InO/Blina group, the median OS was 9.4 months; the median DFS after InO was 5.1 months and 1.5 months after Blina (8.7 vs. 2.5 months in MRD- vs. MRD+, p = 0.02). With a median follow-up of 16.5 months from the start of immunotherapy, 24 patients (34%) are alive and 16 (22%) are alive in CR. CONCLUSION: In our series of R/R B-ALL, Blina and InO treatment demonstrate efficacy for subsequent relapses in terms of MRD response, OS and DFS, and as a bridge to allo-HSCT.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: efficacy, toxicity, and practical considerations.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the cell surface receptor CD22 coupled to a cytotoxic calicheamicin payload via an acid labile linker. InO has shown significant activity in relapsed and refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) in both single agent and combination chemotherapy regimens in adult and pediatric trials. Its use in newly diagnosed elderly patients has also been established while clinical trials investigating its use in newly diagnosed pediatric patients and fit adults are ongoing. Notable toxicities include sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), particularly in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after InO as well as myelosuppression and B-cell aplasia which confer increased infection risk, particularly in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, the planned subsequent curative therapy modality must be considered when using InO to mitigate SOS risk if proceeding to HSCT and account for potential B-cell aplasia if proceeding to chimeric antigen receptor CAR-T therapy. Studies exploring mechanisms of resistance or failure of InO are ongoing but modulation or loss CD22 expression, alternative CD22 splicing, and high Bcl-2 expression have been implicated. In this review, we will summarize the currently available data on InO, with an emphasis on pediatric trials, and explore future directions including combinatorial therapy.

Evaluation of the inpatient use of inotuzumab ozogamicin and creation of appropriate use guidelines.

Inpatient use of inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO) at our academic medical center has increased since its FDA approval in 2017. Administration of IO does not require hospitalization and is appropriate for outpatient use. The aim of this report is to assess the appropriateness of use, overall inpatient utilization, and cost of IO. This is a retrospective chart review of patients that received at least one dose of IO while admitted to the hospital. Data points included rationale for inpatient IO administration, hospital admission reason, number of IO doses and number of vials used, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, percentage of admissions that were new-starts, outpatient continuation of IO, use of concomitant regimens, and CD22 positivity. Between September 1, 2017, and June 30, 2022, 55 doses of IO were identified. Of the 29 unique admissions, common rationales for inpatient IO use included high disease burden/tumor lysis syndrome risk (31%) and use of a regimen requiring hospitalization (28%). The rationale for hospitalization was most commonly 'chemotherapy administration' (34%) and 'relapsed/refractory disease' (38%). Median length of stay was 23 days, most were new starts (76%), and 5 patients died during the associated admission. Only 63% of patients continued therapy in the outpatient setting. The inpatient use of IO was associated with a prolonged length-of-stay, a 17% in-hospital mortality, and represents a significant cost burden to the health system. As a result of these findings, guidelines for inpatient use of IO were implemented across the health system.

Results of the compassionate program of inotuzumab ozogamicin for adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of relapsed B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is poor and few patients can be successfully rescued with conventional therapies. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO), an antibody against the CD22 antigen linked to calicheamicin, has been approved as a rescue treatment in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-ALL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study of adult patients included in the Spanish program of compassionate use of IO in centers from the PETHEMA group (Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematología). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with a median age of 43 years (range, 19-73) were included. Twenty patients (59%) were refractory to the last treatment, IO treatment was given as ≥3rd salvage treatment in 25 patients (73%) and 20 patients (59%) received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation before IO treatment. After a median of 2 cycles of IO, 64% of patients achieved complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete recovery. The median response duration, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 4.7 (95%CI, 2.4-7.0 months), 3.5 (95%CI, 1.0-5.0 months) and 4 months (95%CI, 1.9-6.1 months) respectively, with better OS for patients with relapsed B-ALL versus refractory disease (10.4 vs. 2.5 months, respectively) (p = .01). There was a trend for better OS for patients with first CR duration >12 months (7.2 months [95%CI, 3.2-11.2] vs. 3 months [95% CI, 1.8-4.2] respectively) (p = .054). There was no sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) event during IO treatment, but three patients (9%) developed grade 3-4 SOS during alloHSCT after IO treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed slightly inferior outcomes of the pivotal trial probably due to poorer risk factors and late onset of IO therapy of recruited patients. Our results support early use of IO in relapsed/refractory ALL patients.

Results of salvage therapy with mini-hyper-CVD and inotuzumab ozogamicin with or without blinatumomab in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Historically, adults with relapsed-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) experienced poor outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. This mature analysis explores the benefit of the addition of sequential blinatumomab to low-intensity mini-Hyper-CVD chemotherapy with inotuzumab ozogamicin in this setting. METHODS: Mini-Hyper-CVD (cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone at 50% dose reduction, no anthracycline, methotrexate at 75% dose reduction, cytarabine at 83% dose reduction) was combined with inotuzumab during the first 4 courses. From Patient #68 and onwards, inotuzumab was given in reduced and fractionated doses, and blinatumomab was added sequentially for 4 courses. Maintenance therapy with prednisone, vincristine, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate was given for 12 courses, and blinatumomab for 4 additional courses. RESULTS: Among 110 patients (median age, 37 years) treated, 91 (83%) responded (complete response, 69 patients, 63%). Measurable residual disease negativity was documented in 75 patients (82% of responders). Fifty-three patients (48%) received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome occurred in 9/67 patients (13%) on the original inotuzumab schedule and in 1/43 (2%) on the modified schedule. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 17 months, and the 3 year OS was 40%. The 3 year OS was 34% with mini-Hyper-CVD plus inotuzumab and 52% with additional blinatumomab (P = 0.16). By landmark analysis at 4 months, the 3 year OS was 54%, similar between patients who did or did not receive allogeneic SCT. CONCLUSION: Low-intensity mini-Hyper-CVD plus inotuzumab with or without blinatumomab showed efficacy in patients with relapsed-refractory ALL, with better survival after the addition of blinatumomab. Trial registration The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT01371630.

Real-world treatment patterns of novel drugs in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients in Japan.

Aim: To evaluate treatment patterns of novel therapies (inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab), blinatumomab, and tisagenlecleucel) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a Japanese real-world setting. Patients & Methods: Patients with ALL diagnoses from a Japanese claims database were examined. Results: We included 194 patients (97 patients were prescribed inotuzumab; 97 patients were prescribed blinatumomab; and no patient was prescribed tisagenlecleucel); 81.4% in the inotuzumab group and 78.4% in the blinatumomab group were prescribed chemotherapy prior to the initiation of those drugs. Most patients were prescribed subsequent treatment (60.8 and 58.8%, respectively). A small number of patients were prescribed sequential treatment of inotuzumab-to-blinatumomab or blinatumomab-to-inotuzumab (20.3 and 10.5%, respectively). Conclusion: This study revealed inotuzumab and blinatumomab treatment features in Japan.

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the increase in leukemic cells prevents the production of normal blood cells. As a result, people with ALL become more susceptible to anemia, fatigue, infections, fever, bruising and bleeding easily. ALL progresses rapidly without treatment. In recent years, new therapeutic drugs, including inotuzumab and blinatumomab, have become available; however, it remains unclear how they have been used in clinical practice. In this report, we assess how they are used in clinical practice using a large database to collect the clinical data of ALL patients. To see the treatment pattern, we found that most of the patients (81.4% of patients who received inotuzumab and 78.4% of those who received blinatumomab) had received chemotherapy before starting treatment with inotuzumab or blinatumomab. After patients ended treatment with inotuzumab or blinatumomab, 60.8% of patients who received inotuzumab and 58.8% of those who received blinatumomab received the next therapies, including chemotherapy. However, a small number of patients had received inotuzumab-to-blinatumomab or blinatumomab-to-inotuzumab (20.3 and 10.5%, respectively). These findings show the real-world treatment patterns of inotuzumab and blinatumomab; that is, both inotuzumab and blinatumomab are more likely to be prescribed to patients who might not have enough efficacy from prior chemotherapy or might have had to stop chemotherapy early due to side effects. Overall, there is clinical meaningful information from our findings of how inotuzumab and blinatumomab have been used for treatment of ALL and this information could improve the clinical practice of ALL in Japan.