Developing the IDCaRe team: an integrated and culturally-affirming approach to improving health engagement for HIV-positive veterans.

BACKGROUND: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has been at the forefront of offering integrated and patient-centered care to address the complex needs of more than 30,000 Veterans with HIV in the United States of America. These Veterans present with diverse cultural identities, personal values, and goals pertinent to their care, and they are often managing multiple comorbid chronic conditions, mental health diagnoses, and psychosocial stressors alongside HIV. The quality of their care has often been affected by stigma, minority stress, and the quality of the patient-provider relationship and associated collaborations over treatment approaches and goals, which has a direct effect on outcomes. OBJECTIVE: At San Francisco VA Health Care System, the Infectious Disease Care and Resilience (IDCaRe) team was established to improve outcomes for Veterans with acute needs or persistent difficulties in care delivery and efficacy. METHOD: A five-step model to address complex needs in HIV care was adapted from existing literature and evidence base, combined with a culturally-aligned, interdisciplinary care orientation. This model was implemented with patients determined to be at high-risk for poor health engagement. A representative composite case study demonstrates the process. RESULTS: Three Veterans underwent the intervention with results presented. Lessons learned and future discussions are also discussed. CONCLUSION: The IDCaRe model has promise as an integrated, patient-centered, behaviorally-grounded intervention for improving HIV-related care outcomes for Veterans with complex needs.

Measuring the Maturity of Integrated Care in Singapore with the SCIROCCO Exchange Tool.

Background: How have we progressed and where are the gaps of integrated care in Singapore? Social-health care provision in the context of an ageing population is critical in the city-state's management of the unprecedented demand as the proportion of seniors with multiple complex medical needs have almost doubled in the past decade. Objective: This study measures the maturity level of Singapore's integrated care, identifies key gaps and discusses their implications using the SCIROCCO Exchange tool, an online self-assessment tool consisting of the 12 dimensions necessary for the provision of integrated care. Methods: A three-step mixed method Delphi study was used to derive expert consensus. Participants across the social-healthcare sector as well as representatives from all three public healthcare delivery networks with at least five years of experience were included. Participants rated each of the twelve dimensions of the SCIROCCO Exchange tool on a six-point ordinal scale and provided justifications for each rating. Criteria from the RAND UCLA appropriateness method and thematic analysis were adopted for the analysis. Results: All participants completed the study. The study found five dimensions in the "Initial" maturity level and five dimensions in the "Progressing" maturity level. There were two dimensions which were "Uncertain" because of split responses, possibly due to their differing vantage points and conceptualisations of integrated care. The overall medians were plotted on a spider diagram. The absence of a systematic approach for integrated care was the most common subtheme across all dimensions. This is foundational for integrated care as this would enable stakeholders across health and social care to identify with a common goal. Implications: The findings emphasise the imperative to reshape social-health care delivery by focusing on foundational dimensions (such as structure, governance and citizen empowerment) to enable progress in other dimensions. Following the conclusion of this study, Singapore initiated a primary care reform with the launch of Healthier SG in July 2023. Future research may wish to explore the impact of Healthier SG on maturity of integrated care in Singapore.

Assessing Healthcare Integration: An Integrated Palliative Care System in Spain.

Introduction: This study explored the Osona palliative care system, recognized internationally for its good results in managing the chronic patient. The literature notices a gap of models that evaluate integration in healthcare systems. This study assesses the degree of integration of the Osona palliative care system, as well it implements a model that evaluates integration. Methods: This research used a qualitative methodology, involving a case study design with three study phases. The first phase involved reviewing primary sources, followed by conducting interviews. The final phase entailed comparing the findings with a theoretical model to analyse and validate the results. Results: The study found the integrative elements that the Osona system includes such as: multidisciplinary teams, leadership and a palliative care system that is cost-efficient. It also found aspects to improve including collaboration, continuity of care, early patient identification and lack of funding. Discussion: Our findings suggest that the Osona system has made significant progress toward integration, even though it continues the path of ongoing development in integrated care. Conclusion: This research found that the Osona palliative care system includes many integrating aspects such as multidisciplinary teams, leadership and the system's cost-efficiency. Nevertheless, some aspects need changes such as continuity of care, collaboration, enhanced early patient identification and increase funding. Furthermore, this study provides an example of how to assess integration in a system.

Introducción: Este estudio investiga el sistema de cuidados paliativos de Osona, reconocido internacionalmente por sus buenos resultados en el manejo de pacientes crónicos. La literatura señala una falta de modelos que evalúen la integración en los sistemas de salud. Este estudio evalúa el grado de integración del sistema de cuidados paliativos de Osona y, además, implementa un modelo que evalúa dicha integración. Métodos: Esta investigación utilizó una metodología cualitativa, con un diseño de estudio de caso con tres fases. La primera fase consistió en revisar fuentes primarias, seguida de la realización de entrevistas. La fase final implicó comparar los hallazgos del estudio con un modelo teórico para analizar y validar los resultados. Resultados: El estudio identificó elementos integradores que incluye el sistema de Osona, como equipos multidisciplinarios, liderazgo, y un sistema de cuidados paliativos rentable. También encontró aspectos a mejorar, incluyendo la colaboración, la continuidad de la atención, la identificación temprana de pacientes y la falta de financiación. Discusión: Nuestros resultados sugieren que el sistema de Osona ha logrado un progreso significativo hacia la integración, aunque continúa en el camino de un desarrollo continuo en la atención integrada. Conclusión: Esta investigación encontró que el sistema de cuidados paliativos de Osona incluye muchos aspectos integradores, como equipos multidisciplinarios, liderazgo y eficiencia en costos del sistema. Sin embargo, algunos aspectos requieren cambios, como la continuidad de la atención, la colaboración, la mejora en la identificación temprana de pacientes y el aumento de la financiación. Este estudio aporta un ejemplo de cómo evaluar la integración en un sistema.

Barriers to Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment in Patients with Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease.

The cornerstone in managing alcohol-associated liver disease is the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). Several barriers prevent the implementation of adequate treatment and integrated care models. There are patient-level barriers, including the lack of self-awareness of AUD and being ashamed of AUD. There are clinician-level barriers, including lack of training and discomfort in managing patients with AUD. There are system-level barriers, including challenges related to insurance-based health care systems, and the general reluctance to invest in AUD by organizations focused on for-profit milestones. Therefore, it is imperative to develop multidisciplinary hepatology/addiction integrated care approaches.

Living With and Beyond Cancer With Comorbid Conditions: Qualitative Insights to Understand Psychosocial Support Needs.

INTRODUCTION: There is a pressing need to understand and explore the complex experiences and psychosocial support needs of people LWBC-CM and their informal caregivers, to inform survivorship and supportive care interventions. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with people LWBC-CM and their informal caregivers in Scotland, invited via primary care. One-to-one, face-to-face interviews were conducted with informed consent exploring experiences of symptoms, psychosocial support needs and interactions with health services. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: Forty-one people LWBC-CM and twenty-three informal caregivers were interviewed. Four themes were identified: the Physical and Psychological Impact of Cancer and Comorbidity, Dominant Storie-Prioritising Conditions and Making Sense of Illness, Navigating Health Services and Treatments and Caring for People with Complex Health Conditions. Type and severity of conditions mediated people's experiences and daily living. Complex fatigue-fatigue arising from a number of health conditions-dominated symptomology. Participants navigated multiple appointments and complex medication regimes. Patients identified the need for acknowledgement of other chronic conditions and for streamlined care provision. Mutual caring and social isolation were also identified as part of the caring relationship. CONCLUSIONS: There is a mandate to address the psychosocial support needs of people LWBC-CM, and their informal carers, given the burden of treatment for cancer survivors with moderate to severe complex conditions as they navigate health services. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A patient representative has been involved in all stages of the study from development of the application through study design, commenting on documentation, analysis of transcripts and writing the manuscript. They are included as an author on the manuscript.

Towards a New Integrated Model for Taking Into Account the Experiential Knowledge of People With Chronic Diseases, Integrating Mediation, Therapeutic Education and Partnership: The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model.

INTRODUCTION: The Chronic Care Model (CCM), the Expanded Chronic Care Model (ECCM) and the eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model (eCCM) focus on how healthcare teams and eHealth support can offer effective care and relevant solutions for patients facing chronic care conditions. However, they do not consider how patients can help these teams in their work, nor do they promote ways in which patients can help themselves. However, in the last decade, three different models have emerged that can complete our capacity to design and deliver integrated care for people with chronic diseases. In this article, we propose a revised version of the model that integrates the patient perspective and patients' experience-based knowledge. It integrates three different ways of engaging patients that complement the other patient engagement point of view: the experience of care and mediation in healthcare, therapeutic patient education and patient learning pathways, as well as patient-professional partnership. METHODOLOGY: For each of the three models, we conducted a review of the literature using CINAHL, Medline, OVID, EMBASE PsychINFO, Science Direct and government reports on patient engagement and partnership with their healthcare providers, to integrate the different components of these models into the ECCM and eCCM. The goal is to create a model that better takes into account the experiential knowledge of patients and citizens throughout its different dimensions. RESULTS: We identified 129 papers based on their framework, design, sample, measures and fit with patient engagement and chronic illness and added our own research when relevant. Integrating the three models provides an opportunity to amplify the role played by the patient perspective in the management of chronic disease. The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model (E2C3PM) is intended to rebalance power relations between healthcare professionals and patients (and their caregivers). This new model is based on recognizing patients' experiential knowledge and their roles as caregivers and as full members of the care team. Integrating patient empowerment into the E2C3PM underscores the importance of coproduction care with patients at the clinical, organizational and system levels within a supportive environment. CONCLUSION: Applying this new model should make it possible to better take into account the complexity of chronic diseases, improving the integration not only of care, services and eHealth support but also the various determinants of health and reaching a mutually beneficial settlement among all actors involved. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A patient-researcher contributed to the development of the protocol, the data collection and the preparation and writing of this manuscript.

Feasibility, Fidelity and Acceptability of a Person-Centred Care Transition Support Intervention for Stroke Survivors: A Non-Randomised Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Care transitions from hospital to home are a critical period for patients and their families, especially after a stroke. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a co-designed care transition support for stroke survivors. METHODS: A non-randomised controlled feasibility study recruiting patients who had had stroke and who were to be discharged home and referred to a neurorehabilitation team in primary healthcare was conducted. Data on the feasibility of recruitment and fidelity of the intervention were collected continuously during the study with screening lists and checklists. Data on the perceived quality of care transition were collected at 1-week post-discharge with the Care Transition Measure. Data on participant characteristics, disease-related data and outcomes were collected at baseline (hospitalisation), 1 week and 3 months post-discharge. Data on the acceptability of the intervention from the perspective of healthcare professionals were collected at 3 months using the Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire. RESULTS: Altogether, 49 stroke survivors were included in the study: 28 in the intervention group and 21 in the control group. The recruitment and data collection of patient characteristics, disease-related data, functioning and outcomes were feasible. The fidelity of the intervention differed in relation to the different components of the co-designed care transition support. The intervention was acceptable from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Concerns were raised about the fidelity of the intervention. A positive direction of effects of the intervention on the perceived quality of the care transition was found. CONCLUSION: The study design, data collection, procedures and intervention were deemed feasible and acceptable. Modifications are needed to improve intervention fidelity by supporting healthcare professionals to apply the intervention. The feasibility study showed a positive direction of effect on perceived quality with the care transition, but a large-scale trial is needed to determine its effectiveness. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Stroke survivors, significant others and healthcare professionals were involved in a co-design process, including the joint development of the intervention's components, contextual factors to consider, participant needs and important outcomes to target. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT0292587.

Identification of interventions to improve patient experienced quality of care in transitions between healthcare settings: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Transitions in healthcare settings can be a challenge for patients and they express a need for guidance and support to cope with these transitions. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate if interventions can improve patients' experiences when transitioning between healthcare settings. METHODS: This review was conducted following the Johanna Briggs Institute's methods and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Included articles were published and peer-reviewed, and reported qualitative and quantitative findings on patient experiences with interventions when transitioning between healthcare settings. The search was conducted in May 2024 in Medline Ovid, Embase Ovid, and Cinahl. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included. Factors extracted from the studies were: author(s), year of publication, country of origin, study design, theoretical methods, population description, intervention, phenomena of interest(s), and key findings. There has been an increase in published studies on the subject in the last few years, and most of the included studies originated from Western countries. Most studies were quantitative, primarily RCTs, and the theoretical methods were thus mainly statistical analysis. The study populations were found to be heterogeneous. The interventions were categorized: care coordinator, program, integrated care, online communication platform, coaching, discharge care plan, and miscellaneous interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, interventions were found to improve the patient experience. Centralization of healthcare has increased the number of transitions, and patients express that the coordination of healthcare transitions can be improved. This review's findings should be used alongside other research on interventions' effect on factors like hospital readmissions and mortality to determine the optimal intervention to implement.

Mobilizing strategic inflection points for sustainment of an effective intervention in an integrated learning health system: an interpretive description.

BACKGROUND: Innovative models of care have the potential to improve the sustainability of health systems by improving patient and provider experiences and population outcomes while simultaneously reducing costs. Yet, it is challenging to recognize the distinctive points during research and quality improvement processes that contribute to sustainment of effective interventions. The business concept of an inflection point-the position on the curve of a trajectory where the progress in implementation of an intervention is accelerated or decelerated-may be useful to understand implementation and improve sustainability and ultimately sustainment of effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively identify and describe strategic inflection points that accelerated the sustainability process and led to the sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted in Alberta, Canada and employed an interpretive description design. Purposively sampled documents (proposals, project management plans, reports to funders and sponsors, meeting minutes, and fidelity audit and feedback checklists) from the Alberta Family Integrated Care cluster randomized controlled trial and quality improvement project constituted data for this study. RESULTS: To accelerate sustainability in the research context, we identified (1) alignment with strategic priorities, (2) iterative, user-centered co-design, and (3) contextualization of implementation as strategic inflection points. To accelerate sustainability in the health system context, we identified (1) the learning health system, (2) enduring partnerships, (3) responsivity to societal and system change, (4) embedded governance, and (5) intentional integration into the health system as strategic inflection points. Capitalizing on these strategic inflection points led to sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care in the provincial health system. CONCLUSIONS: We identified key inflection points in the research and health system contexts that led to sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care. By anticipating, recognizing, and leveraging inflection points in the sustainability process, researchers may be able to accelerate implementation and achieve sustainment of multi-component interventions in complex systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02879799. Registration date: May 27, 2016. Protocol version: June 9, 2016; version 2. Protocol publication: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2181-3 .

Development and verification of community development index for improving functioning of aged people in rural districts (third report): data collection and analysis system on social mutual aid are desired for community development for elderly persons living in rural districts.

Objective: The author conducted a survey on social mutual aid and the social stimulative effect of older adults living in a rural district, and compared young old and old-old persons to clarify the roles of public health nurses in promoting community development. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study based on Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Care Utilization was conducted with 2,500 residents aged 65 years or older of City A in Akita Prefecture. The study was conducted from April 8 to May 15, 2017. Participants were administered a questionnaire containing items on "social mutual aid in the rural district". Responses were recorded on a Likert scale. Results: As a result of factor analysis, the following four factors were extracted; [Blessing of a rural district and mutual help and assistance unique to a rural district], [Closeness of healthcare welfare service and family doctors in conjunction with their own health], [Decline of culture and community unique to rural districts accompanied by depopulation] and [Closeness of the town where they live]. Differences were observed in the closeness of social mutual aid and local societal stimulative effects, even between generations of old and old-old persons. In young-old persons, a negative correlation was observed between [Closeness of the town where they live] and other factors. In old-old persons, a negative correlation was found between [Decline of culture and community unique to rural districts accompanied by depopulation] and other factors. Conclusion: Since not only individual health indices but also local social mutual aid, which relates to individuals' influence on the construction of a Community-based Integrated Care System in a rural district, the author posits that a data collection and analysis system on social mutual aid would be beneficial for community development for older adults living in rural districts.

Early Health Impacts of a Primary Care Consultation Model for People Served by Assertive Community Treatment teams.

The cardiometabolic health outcomes and life expectancy of people living with serious mental illness (SMI) continue to significantly flag behind that of the general population. This study explores the possibility of using the evidence-based Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model and infrastructure to increase access to primary care and improve cardiometabolic outcomes of people with SMI. Four ACT teams in a large urban area received the services of a primary care consultant who was co-located at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), met regularly with ACT team clinicians to review a cardiometabolic registry of participants, and engaged participants in primary care services. Health screening rates, primary care utilization, and cardiometabolic outcomes-body mass index, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol, and tobacco smoking status-were monitored over the course of a year. The efficacy of this integrated care model was also explored through focus groups with ACT team staff and participants. Significant improvements in screening rates were found for the ACT teams that received this integrated care intervention; however, only modest improvements in cardiometabolic outcomes were found. Future longitudinal, multi-site studies are needed to fully determine the impact of integrated care models on the physical health outcomes of this vulnerable population.

Assessing the Strengths and Weaknesses for Implementing a Place-Based Model of Care for Older People on the Central Coast, Australia: Results of a Pilot Project Using the Population Health Management Maturity Index (PHM-MI) Tool.

Introduction: Population health management is increasingly being used to support place-based models of care. This case study provides an account of the use of the Population Health Management - Maturity Index (PHM-MI) tool to inform the future development of a neighbourhood model of care for older people in the Central Coast region of Australia. Description: The PHM-MI tool comprises a set of six evidence-informed elements known to be important in enabling PHM in practice. As part of a joint strategic needs assessment, 17 selected stakeholders from key regional organizations were invited to undertake the PHM-MI tool survey. Three follow-up workshops were held to interpret the results and determine priority actions. Discussion: The PHM-MI scores revealed that the overall maturity of the Central Coast to successfully deliver PHM was low across all six elements, findings that were corroborated through participant workshops. Systemic fragmentations, most pertinently of funding and regulation, incentivised silo-based working. The need to formalise and strengthen regional collaborations, enable data integration, find creative ways to use existing funding streams, and promote community engagement were highlighted as core priorities. Conclusion: Using the PHM-MI tool was enabled by it being embedded within a pre-existing regional strategic process. The results were used to inform future regional priorities. The PHM-MI tool has the potential for use across regional or national contexts.

The Integrated Care World is a Stage: Applying Goffman's Theory of Dramaturgy to the Activities of Integrated Care.

Among the challenges in delivering integrated health and social care services is the need to attend to the coordination of tasks, roles, activities, and operations, while considering how these efforts are experienced by patients, carers and communities. The literature has noted an important disconnect between how providers and leaders view their efforts to coordinate service delivery, and how patients perceive these efforts on the receiving end. Our team has provided guidance to integrated care efforts in Ontario, Canada by drawing on Goffman's theory of Dramaturgy to help classify the actions of integrated care delivery as linked to the roles individuals play in the delivery of care. Using this framing helps to uncover how "backstage" processes (such as team-functioning, funding models, and digital infrastructures) create a necessary foundation on which "frontstage" actions (or performances) can be effectively delivered.

Improving the integration of care for trans adults: ICTA a mixed-methods study.

Background: This research concerns improving the National Health Service health services trans adults need. These include the national specialist Gender Identity Clinics that support people making a medical transition. Not all trans people need to make a medical transition, and transition can take many different paths. Waits to be seen by Gender Identity Clinics are, however, several years long, and there may be significant problems of co-ordination between different aspects of transition-related care, and between transition-related care and general health care. Objectives: The main objectives were to understand: Which factors make services more or less accessible and acceptable to the variety of trans adults? How initiatives for providing more person-centred and integrated care can be successfully implemented and further improved? Design, data sources and participants: An online and paper screening survey was used to gather data on demographics and service use of trans people across the United Kingdom, with 2056 responses. Researchers used survey data to construct five purposive subsamples for individual qualitative interviews, identifying groups of people more likely to experience social exclusion or stigma. There were 65 online interviews. In addition, 23 trans Black people and people of colour attended focus groups. Six case studies were completed: four on initiatives to improve care and two on experiences of particular trans populations. Fifty-five service provider staff and 45 service users were interviewed. Results: The following undermine person-centred co-ordinated care and can lead to experiences of harm: lack of respectful treatment of trans people by general practitioner practices; inadequate funding of services; lack of support during waiting; the extended and challenging nature of Gender Identity Clinic diagnostic assessments, sometimes experienced as adversarial; breakdowns in collaboration between Gender Identity Clinics and general practitioner practices over hormone therapy; lack of National Health Service psychological support for trans people. Case studies indicated ways to improve care, although each has significant unresolved issues: training in trans health care for general practitioners; third-sector peer-support workers for trans people who come to National Health Services; gender services taking a collaborative approach to assessing what people need, clarifying treatment options, benefits and risks; regional general practitioner-led hormone therapy clinics, bringing trans health care into the mainstream; psychology services that support trans people rather than assess them. Limitations: Some contexts of care and experiences of particular groups of trans people were not addressed sufficiently within the scope of the project. While efforts were made to recruit people subject to multiple forms of stigma, there remained gaps in representation. Conclusions and future work: The findings have significant implications for commissioners and providers of existing National Health Services gender services, including recently established pilot services in primary care. In particular they point to the need for assessments for access to transition care to be more collaborative and culturally aware, implying the value of exploring informed consent models for accessing transition-related care. Further research is needed to investigate how far the findings apply with particular subpopulations. Study registration: This study is registered as Research Registry, no. 5235. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/51/08) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 28. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

This research concerns improving the range of National Health Service health services that trans adults need. Trans people have a different gender from that assigned at birth or in early childhood. Not all need to make a medical transition to express their gender, and transition can take many different forms, including hormone therapy, various kinds of surgery, and other procedures such as hair removal. At the time of writing, trans people over 17 who need to make a medical transition can seek care at one of the United Kingdom's 10 specialist National Health Service Gender Identity Clinics. However, people must wait a very long time before they are seen. Through 110 in-depth interviews, as well as focus groups attended by 23 people, this research explored recent experiences of trans people receiving various kinds of health care. A further 55 interviews investigated the views of National Health Service and voluntary-sector staff involved in delivering trans health care. All of this has led to insights about how services can be improved, and the development of online courses for healthcare staff and for people who use services or support those who use services. The research indicates what can lead to experiences of poor care that is not 'joined up': lack of respectful treatment of trans people by general practitioner practices; inadequate funding of services; lack of support while waiting; the extended and difficult nature of Gender Identity Clinic diagnostic assessments; breakdowns in collaboration between Gender Identity Clinics and general practitioner practices over hormone therapy; lack of National Health Service psychological support for trans people. The research indicates some important ways to improve care: training in trans health care for general practitioners; third-sector peer-support workers for trans people who come to National Health Service services; gender services taking a collaborative approach to assessing what people need, clarifying treatment options, benefits and risks; regional general practitioner-led hormone therapy clinics, bringing trans health care into the mainstream; psychology services that support trans people rather than assessing them.

Multiphase optimization strategy to establish optimal delivery of nutrition-related services in healthcare settings: A step towards clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Minorities living in the Southern US generally have greater incidence and prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases compared to other groups. Cardiometabolic disease prevalence and risk can be reduced by focusing on diet and lifestyle modifications. There is need for holistic and integrated care models for community-based healthcare organizations who are already working with minorities. This research aimed to select and optimize essential psychosocial and structural components to address diet behaviors among racial/ethnic minorities, and/or disadvantaged background young to middle aged adult populations in Mississippi. METHODS: Nutrition360 was guided by a community-academic team using a participatory approach and included a preparation and two optimization phases to examine different approaches to dietary interventions utilizing the multiphase optimization strategy. Each intervention arm included three different modalities to identify the most feasible delivery method. The intervention was conducted at a community-based, outpatient healthcare center located in Jackson, MS. Eligible participants were between 25 and 50 years old, residents of Jackson metropolitan area, at risk for cardiovascular disease-related premature mortality, and had internet access. Individuals who completed baseline surveys were randomly assigned to an intervention group and then to modality order. Co-primary outcomes were research participant burden and cost-effectiveness and secondary outcomes were attendance, and dietary measures. RESULTS: Thirty-one, African American individuals with a mean age of 40.5 years completed baseline surveys and were randomized to an intervention program. CONCLUSION: The two most feasible and cost-effective interventions will be combined to further test this model's delivery in the real-world setting as part of the next optimization phase. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06286618. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06286618.

Interventions to minimise hospital winter pressures related to discharge planning and integrated care: a rapid mapping review of UK evidence.

Background: Winter pressures are a familiar phenomenon within the National Health Service and represent the most extreme of many regular demands placed on health and social care service provision. This review focuses on a part of the pathway that is particularly problematic: the discharge process from hospital to social care and the community. Although studies of discharge are plentiful, we identified a need to focus on identifying interventions and initiatives that are a specific response to 'winter pressures'. This mapping review focuses on interventions or initiatives in relation to hospital winter pressures in the United Kingdom with either discharge planning to increase smart discharge (both a reduction in patients waiting to be discharged and patients being discharged to the most appropriate place) and/or integrated care. Methods: We conducted a mapping review of United Kingdom evidence published 2018-22. Initially, we searched MEDLINE, Health Management Information Consortium, Social Care Online, Social Sciences Citation Index and the King's Fund Library to find relevant interventions in conjunction with winter pressures. From these interventions we created a taxonomy of intervention types and a draft map. A second broader stage of searching was then undertaken for named candidate interventions on Google Scholar (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). For each taxonomy heading, we produced a table with definitions, findings from research studies, local initiatives and systematic reviews and evidence gaps. Results: The taxonomy developed was split into structural, changing staff behaviour, changing community provision, integrated care, targeting carers, modelling and workforce planning. The last two categories were excluded from the scope. Within the different taxonomy sections we generated a total of 41 headings. These headings were further organised into the different stages of the patient pathway: hospital avoidance, alternative delivery site, facilitated discharge and cross-cutting. The evidence for each heading was summarised in tables and evidence gaps were identified. Conclusions: Few initiatives identified were specifically identified as a response to winter pressures. Discharge to assess and hospital at home interventions are heavily used and well supported by the evidence but other responses, while also heavily used, were based on limited evidence. There is a lack of studies considering patient, family and provider needs when developing interventions aimed at improving delayed discharge. Additionally, there is a shortage of studies that measure the longer-term impact of interventions. Hospital avoidance and discharge planning are whole-system approaches. Considering the whole health and social care system is imperative to ensure that implementing an initiative in one setting does not just move the problem to another setting. Limitations: Time limitations for completing the review constrained the period available for additional searches. This may carry implications for the completeness of the evidence base identified. Future work: Further research to consider a realist review that views approaches across the different sectors within a whole system evaluation frame. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130588) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 31. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Every year, the National Health Service struggles with huge care demands from people with heart and lung problems. This 'mapping review' aimed to chart the evidence around what has been done to minimise winter pressures related to discharge planning, by helping people leaving hospital sooner, and by optimising integrated care (also known as 'collaborative care') and to make suggestions for future research. Good research evidence was identified for three specific approaches: Acute medical units: these units provide rapid assessment, diagnosis and treatment for adults referred by their general practitioner or the emergency department. Discharge to assess: this involves discharging patients who need care services but not an acute hospital bed. Patients are either discharged home or are transferred to an appropriate community setting with short-term funded support while their future care needs are assessed. Hospital at home: this approach provides patients with the care they need at home instead of in hospital (also known as virtual wards). The evidence for many other activities to reduce winter pressures was weaker, coming from case studies, conference presentations or small, low methodological quality (poorly designed or executed) research studies. The review identified many different initiatives with diverse names or labels and it is also important to consider how implementing an initiative in one setting might affect another setting. Further research is recommended around what works best for which patient groups, under what circumstances and why, based on common processes within the different initiatives and across the whole health and social care system.

Efficacy of a Comprehensive and Personalised Approach for Frail Older People in Valencia (Spain): A Pre-Post Controlled Trial.

Frailty is a common condition in older adults that negatively impacts health and quality of life. This study evaluated a comprehensive, personalised, and coordinated intervention under the value-based care approach to address frailty's multidimensional nature in older people in the primary care setting. It employed a pre-post randomised controlled design involving 242 frail individuals aged over 65 years living in the community in Valencia (Spain) between 2021 and 2023. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 12 months (immediately post-intervention), and 18 months. The intervention included a personalised care plan supported by technology, with monthly motivational follow-ups and plan updates by health professionals and participants. Outcomes were measured using an assessment questionnaire that included the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement dataset for the older population: physical health, physical functioning, general mental health, satisfaction with social activities and relationships, ability to carry out usual social roles and activities, pain, general quality of life, loneliness, physical frailty, psychological frailty, and social frailty. The study found significant improvements in physical frailty, quality of life, reduced health resource use and hospitalisations and lower levels of pain and depression/anxiety compared to baseline. The findings suggest further research into value-based care approaches, emphasizing the development and activation of personalised, comprehensive programs for older individuals with frailty.

Overcoming Barriers: A Comprehensive Review of Chronic Pain Management and Accessibility Challenges in Rural America.

In the United States (U.S.), chronic pain poses substantial challenges in rural areas where access to effective pain management can be limited. Our literature review examines chronic pain management in rural U.S. settings, identifying key issues and disparities. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified high-quality studies published between 2000 and 2024 on chronic pain management in the rural U.S. Data were categorized into thematic areas, including epidemiology, management challenges, current strategies, research gaps, and future directions. Key findings reveal that rural populations have a significantly higher prevalence of chronic pain and are more likely to experience severe pain. Economic and systemic barriers include a shortage of pain specialists, limited access to nonpharmacologic treatments, and inadequate insurance coverage. Rural patients are also less likely to engage in beneficial modalities like physical therapy and psychological support due to geographic isolation. Additionally, rural healthcare providers more often fulfill multiple medical roles, leading to burnout and decreased quality of care. Innovative approaches such as telehealth and integrated care models show the potential to improve access and outcomes. Our review highlights the need for increased telehealth utilization, enhanced provider education, and targeted interventions to address the specific pain needs of rural populations.

A qualitative interview study exploring continuity within a community integrated palliative care model and the influence of remote and digital approaches to care.

BACKGROUND: Demand for palliative care is rising. Recent UK policy approaches promote integrated care models - collaborations between generalist practitioners and multidisciplinary specialists - and remote and digital practices. The extent to which different forms of continuity are supported within this evolving context is currently unclear. AIM: To explore the experience of continuity and impact of remote and digital practices within an integrated palliative care model. DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative interview study of patients and bereaved relatives recruited from a GP practice list and healthcare professionals delivering the integrated palliative care service for that population. METHOD: 20 narrative and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 patients, relatives, and professionals between May 2022 and November 2023. They explored how care was delivered or received, focusing on coherency and the use of remote and digital practices. Data were theorized using a novel framework that considered psychodynamic, biomedical, sociotechnical, and sociopolitical domains of continuity. RESULTS: The need for human care and connection were of primary importance and affected by intersubjective, biomedical, sociotechnical, and sociopolitical factors that influenced continuity of care. Despite the logistical ease of remote and digital practices, professionals had to work harder or around technologies to provide a 'caring' service. This was exacerbated by a lack of co-localisation, loss of longitudinal relationships, and reduction in tacit knowledge. CONCLUSION: Numerous complex factors and the exacerbating effects of remote and digital practices influence continuity and coherency within an integrated palliative care model.

Effectiveness of integrated care models for stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Given that stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide, there is an urgent need for a coordinated healthcare approach to mitigate its effects. The objectives of this study were to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of stroke integrated care models and develop recommendations for a representative model. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The literature search identified randomized controlled trials comparing integrated care models with standard care for stroke patients. The included studies followed PICOs inclusion criteria. The qualitative analysis included creating a flowchart for the literature screening process, and tables detailing the basic characteristics of the included studies, the adherence to the ten principles and the results of the quality assessments. Subsequently, quantitative meta-analytical procedures were conducted to statistically pool the data and quantify the effects of the integrated care models on stroke patients' health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, and depression. The China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine Disc (CBMDISC), Cochrane Library, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, and Clinical Trials were searched from inception to March 13, 2024. RESULTS: Of the 2547 obtained articles, 19 were systematically reviewed and 15 were included in the meta-analysis. The integrated care models enhanced stroke patients' health-related quality of life, ability to perform activities of daily living, and reduced depression. Adherence to the 10 principles varied: comprehensive services, patient focus, and standardized care delivery had strong implementation, while gaps were noted in geographic coverage, information systems, governance structures, and financial management. CONCLUSION: Integrated care models improve outcomes for stroke patients and adherence to the 10 principles is vital for their implementation success. This study's findings call for a more standardized approach to implementing integrated care models, emphasizing the need for integrated services, patient-centred care, and interdisciplinary collaboration, while also addressing the identified gaps in terms of integration efforts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides evidence-based recommendations on the most effective integrated care approaches for stroke patients, potentially leading to better patient outcomes, reduced healthcare costs, and improved quality of life.