Oncological outcomes of conversion therapy in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: a large-scale retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the long-term oncological outcomes of patients who undergo conversion surgery (CS) in gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) are limited. METHODS: GC patients with PM who received intraperitoneal (ip) and systemic chemotherapy between April 2015 and January 2021 were enrolled. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with survival. Clinicopathological and survival outcomes were compared between those with CS and those without CS (NCS). The paclitaxel (PTX) plus tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium capsules (S-1) (PS) + ip PTX and oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) + ip PTX groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. Oncological and survival data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 540 patients who received ip chemotherapy via subcutaneous port and systemic chemotherapy were analyzed and 268 patients were enrolled, including 113 who underwent CS and 155 who did not. Overall survival (OS) were 27.0 months and 11.8 months in the CS and NCS groups (P < 0.0001), respectively. R0 resection was an independent prognostic factor for patients who underwent CS. The OS of patients with or without ovariectomy was 21.3 or 12.0 months (P < 0.0001). No difference of clinicopathological and survival outcomes was found between the PS + ip PTX and SOX + ip PTX groups. CONCLUSION: Conversion therapy is safe and adverse events were manageable. CS improves the survival of GC patients with PM after ip and systemic chemotherapy. R0 is an important prognostic factor. Furthermore, outcomes are comparable between the PS + ip PTX and SOX + ip PTX groups.

Pharmacokinetics of glucagon after intravenous, intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administration in a pig model.

INTRODUCTION: There is increasing scientific evidence to substantiate using low-dose glucagon as a supplement to insulin therapy in artificial pancreata for diabetes mellitus type 1. The delivery of both these hormones intraperitoneally would mimic normal physiology. However, our knowledge of the pharmacological properties of glucagon after intraperitoneal administration is limited. This study compared the pharmacokinetics of glucagon after intraperitoneal, subcutaneous and intravenous administration and the pharmacodynamic effects of glucagon on glucose metabolism after intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administration in a pig model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve pigs were included. Glucagon was administered intraperitoneally, subcutaneously and intravenously in a randomised order. Arterial samples were collected every 2-10 min for 150 min to determine plasma glucagon and blood glucose concentrations. RESULTS: The bioavailability of glucagon was significantly lower after intraperitoneal compared with subcutaneous administration with a median difference (95% confidence interval) of 13% (4-22). The effect of glucagon on glucose metabolism was equal after intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administration. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal glucagon administration resulted in lower systemic glucagon exposure than subcutaneous administration without loss of efficiency. We interpret this as evidence of a major first-pass metabolism of glucagon in the liver.

SOX combined with intraperitoneal perfusion of docetaxel compared with DOS regimen in the first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer with malignant ascites: a prospective observation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to verify the survival superiority of the combination of intraperitoneal perfusion and systemic chemotherapy over standard systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 78 advanced gastric cancer patients with malignant ascites were randomly divided into D-SOX group (intraperitoneal infusion of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 on d1 and d8, intravenous oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on d1, and oral administration of S-1 on d1-d14) and DOS group (intravenous docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on d1, intravenous oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on d1, and oral administration of S-1 on d1-d14). Efficacy of both groups was evaluated every 2 cycles with 21 days as a cycle. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate, ascites control rate, negative conversion rate of ascites cytology, and side effects. RESULTS: The median overall survival in D-SOX group was significantly higher than that in the DOS group (11.7 vs 10.3 months, HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.86, P = 0.005). The ascites control rate in the D-SOX group was 58.9% and 30.8% in DOS group (95%CI 42.8-75.1% vs 95%CI 15.6-45.9%, P = 0.012). Besides, the adverse reactions were tolerable in both groups, and patients in the D-SOX group had lower grade 3/4 blood toxicity than that in the DOS group (26% vs 54%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared with traditional systemic chemotherapy, docetaxel intraperitoneal infusion combined with chemotherapy has better therapeutic effect on gastric cancer ascites, with better survival benefit and tolerance and less hematological toxicity, which is worthy of further research and clinical application.

Intraperitoneal infusion of recombinant human endostatin improves prognosis in gastric cancer ascites.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal administration of recombinant human endostatin in gastric cancer with malignant ascites. Methods: Clinical data of 90 patients (37 in an Endostar® combined with cisplatin group and 53 in a cisplatin group) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and so on. Results: Median overall survival was longer in the combination group (9.7 vs 8.1 months; p = 0.01). ORR and DCR were higher in the combination group (ORR: 75.7% vs 54.7%; p = 0.04; DCR: 94.6% vs 75.5%; p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in adverse effects between the two groups. Conclusion: Intraperitoneal administration of recombinant human endostatin improved efficacy and survival for gastric cancer with ascites.

Ascites (a buildup of fluid in the abdomen) resulting from the spread of gastric cancer (GC) results in extremely poor clinical outcomes, and current treatments have shown little effectiveness. Previous results showed that abdominal injection with chemotherapeutic agents enabled an increase in the dose of chemotherapeutic agents and reduced side effects or undesirable effects in the abdominal cavity. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of abdominal injection with the anticancer drug recombinant human endostatin in GC with ascites. Clinical data of 90 patients were inspected and analyzed in this study. Thirty-seven patients who received abdominal infusion with both cisplatin (CDDP) and recombinant human endostatin were included in an Endostar^® combined with CDDP group, and 53 patients who received abdominal infusion with CDDP alone were included in a CDDP group. The results showed that median survival time was longer in the combination group than in the CDDP group (9.7 months vs 8.1 months). Besides, therapeutic outcomes, including objective response rate and disease control rate, were better in the combination group. Side effects or undesirable effects were similar in the two groups. To conclude, abdominal injection with recombinant human endostatin improved survival time and therapeutic outcomes for GC patients with ascites.

Phase 1 trial of intraperitoneal paclitaxel in combination with intravenous cisplatin and oral capecitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases (IPGP study).

AIMS: Gastric cancer with peritoneal involvement has a poor prognosis. Intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel has shown promising results in these patients. However, this approach has only been studied in the Asian population, and in combination with S-1. We investigated the maximum tolerated dose of IP paclitaxel, with a standard chemotherapy combination, in the Australian population. METHODS: The study of the population included metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative gastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneal involvement. Treatment included six 21-day cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IV, day 1) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 PO BD, days 1-14) plus IP paclitaxel (days 1 and 8). IP paclitaxel doses for cohort 1-3 were 10, 20, and 30 mg/m2 , respectively, in a 3 + 3 standard dose-escalation design. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled of which 6 were female and the median age was 63. Two patients developed dose-limiting toxicities. No grade 4/5 toxicities were recorded. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Therefore, as defined by the study protocol, the recommended phase-2 dose for IP paclitaxel was determined to be 30 mg/m2 . The 12-month survival rate was 46.7%, and the median survival was 11.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 15.3-6.9). CONCLUSIONS: IP paclitaxel is safe in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine and the recommended phase-2 dose is 30 mg/m2 .

Evaluation of non-completion of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with non-completion of intraperitoneal with intravenous chemotherapy [IP/IV] in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: This was an Institutional Review Board approved, retrospective cohort study in women with stage III EOC following optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) (<1 cm) followed by IP/IV chemotherapy from 2000-2016. Demographic, surgical, and oncologic variables were collected. Pearson χ² test and 2 sample t-test evaluated for variables associated with IP/IV chemotherapy completion. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 96 women, 71.9% (n=69) completed 6 cycles of IP/IV chemotherapy. The majority had high grade serous histology (n=82; 85.4%) and stage IIIC disease (n=83; 86.5%). Common reasons for IP/IV chemotherapy discontinuation were grade 3-4 gastrointestinal (n=10; 37.0%), neurologic (n=6; 22.2%), hematologic (n=3; 11.1%), renal toxicities (n=3; 11.1%) and port infections (n=3; 11.1%). Incidence of IP port complications was 20.8% (n=20). Port complications (48.0% vs. 11.6%; p<0.001) and hospitalization during chemotherapy (29.6% vs. 2.9%; p<0.001) were more frequent in patients who discontinued IP/IV chemotherapy. Patients who completed IP/IV chemotherapy had higher rates of home discharge following CRS (92.2% vs. 72.0%; p<0.01) and lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (0 vs. 1.0; p=0.04). There was no significant difference in PFS (p=0.51) nor OS (p=0.38) between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: In this series, the rate of IP/IV chemotherapy completion is high. Non-home discharge and higher ECOG status following CRS are associated with IP/IV chemotherapy non-completion and should be considered in treatment planning.

Comparison of Intraperitoneal Normal Saline Infusion with Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver in Reducing Shoulder and Upper Abdomen Pain Following Gynecologic Laparoscopic Procedures: A Randomized, Controlled, Triple-Blind Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed at evaluating the effect of intraperitoneal infusion of normal saline (NS) and pulmonary recruitment maneuver (PRM) on the reduction of pain in shoulder, upper abdomen, and incision site after elective laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. METHODS: Totally, 280 patients (mean age: 30.5 years) that underwent laparoscopic gynecologic surgery from October 2013 to August 2015 were randomly and equally allocated into four groups. Group A received intraperitoneal infusion of NS 1.5 - 2 mL/kg of body weight; group B received PRM with five manual pulmonary inflations at a maximum pressure of 60 cm H2O; group C simultaneously received two former interventions; and finally the control group D received routine method of gentle abdominal pressure. All patients were assessed in the first 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: There was an unsteady pattern for pain in shoulder, upper abdomen, and incision site at different time points across the studied groups over the trial. Patients in group B showed significantly lower shoulder pain 24 hours after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery (P = 0.01), while patients in group D had significantly lower incision site pain (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PRM was superior to intraperitoneal infusion of NS for reducing pain in the first 24 hours after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

Terapia intraperitoneal paliativa en ascitis maligna fîlcrossMark refractaria / Intraperitoneal palliative therapy in refractory malignant ascites

Resumen El tratamiento convencional de la ascitis maligna refractaria es un reto oncológico pues provee mejoría sintomática poco duradera. La terapia intraperitoneal ha sido evaluada principalmente en reportes y series de casos, y en algunos ensayos clínicos, estudiados principalmente en la ascitis por cáncer ovárico y gastrointestinal. Esta terapia incluye: isótopos radioactivos, quimioterapia con hipertermia y sin esta, terapia inmunológica, biológica y otras. Los tratamientos más exitosos con respuestas variables, y aunque la comparación directa no es posible, son: la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (respuesta global entre 85,7% y 100%) y el catumaxomab, que frente a la paracentesis demostró una supervivencia libre de punción de 46 vs 11 días (HR 0,254) y una mediana a la próxima paracentesis de 77 vs 13 días (HR 0,169), con impacto positivo en la calidad de vida, principal fin en el escenario paliativo. La investigación en este campo continúa buscando resultados más duraderos, seguros y costo-efectivos.

Abstract Conventional treatment of refractory malignant ascites is an oncological challenge since it provides little lasting symptomatic improvement. Intraperitoneal therapy, evaluated mainly through series and case reports, and some clinical trials include the use of radioisotopes, chemotherapy, with and without hyperthermia, immunological and biological therapy and others. It has been studied mainly in ascites from ovarian and gastrointestinal cancer. With variable response rates, and although direct comparison is not possible, the most successfully treatments are hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (overall response rate between 85.7% and 100%), and catumaxomab, which compared to paracentesis, demonstrated a puncture-free survival of 46 vs. 11 days (HR 0.254) and a median time to next paracentesis of 77 vs. 13 days (HR 0.169). This had a positive impact on quality of life, which is the main goal in the palliative setting. Research in this field continues looking for more lasting, safe, and cost-effective results.

Peritoneal metastatic goblet-cell carcinoid tumor treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

We report a case of a goblet-cell carcinoid tumor of the appendix which metastasized to the peritoneum and was treated by using cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. A 47-year-old male presented with chronic constipation and was diagnosed as having a rectal adenocarcinoma with a signet-ring-cell component under colonoscopy. Computed tomography suggested peritoneal metastases with diffuse nodular parietal peritoneal thickening of the entire abdomen and focal invasion of the upper rectum by a seeding mass. CRS with intraperitoneal chemotherapy was done under the diagnosis of a rectal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastases. The pathologic diagnosis was a goblet-cell carcinoid tumor of the appendix with peritoneal metastasis. The histological discrepancy between a peritoneal metastatic mass and a rectal mass was due to the mixed histological pattern of a goblet-cell carcinoid tumor. A metastatic mass may not share identical immunohistochemical characteristics from its origin. This histologic discrepancy necessitates caution in diagnosing a distant metastasis of a goblet-cell carcinoid tumor.

Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and bioactivity of the therapeutic antibody catumaxomab intraperitoneally administered to cancer patients.

AIMS: Catumaxomab is the first EMEA approved trifunctional anti-EpCAMxanti-CD3 antibody for the treatment of cancer patients with malignant ascites. A phase II pharmacokinetic study was conducted to determine local and systemic antibody concentrations and anti-drug antibody (ADA) development. METHODS: Thirteen cancer patients with symptomatic malignant ascites were treated with four ascending doses of 10, 20, 50, and 150 microg catumaxomab intraperitoneally (i.p.) infused on days 0, 3, 6 or 7 and 10. The pharmacokinetics of catumaxomab were studied by implementation of supportive data from a non clinical mouse tumour model. Additionally, ADA development was monitored. RESULTS: Ten out of 13 patients were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis. Catumaxomab became increasingly concentrated in ascites during the course of treatment, attaining effective concentrations in the ng ml(-1) range. Catumaxomab remained immunologically active even after several days in the circulation. The observed systemic catumaxomab exposure was low (<1%), with a maximal median plasma concentration (C(max)) of 403 pg ml(-1). The mean elimination half-life in the plasma was 2.13 days. All patients developed ADA, but not before the last infusion. High observed inter-individual variability and low systemic exposure may be explained by the inverse correlation between tumour burden, effector cell numbers and systemic antibody bioavailability as demonstrated in a defined mouse tumour model. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the high and effective local concentrations, low systemic exposure and acceptable safety profile, we confirmed that the i.p. application scheme of catumaxomab for the treatment of malignant ascites is appropriate.