Use of belimumab in treating patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-center, real-world retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a real-world setting and provide a valuable reference for clinical treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 101 patients with SLE who came to our hospital from March 2020 to September 2022, 56 of whom with lupus nephritis (LN), were selected. All patients received belimumab in combination with standard of care(SoC)therapy regimen for more than 52 weeks and their clinical/laboratory data, assessment of disease activity, glucocorticoids dosage and occurrence of adverse events were recorded. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and DORIS remission as a primary goal in the treatment of SLE. The groups were classified according to the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K): SLEDAI-2 K < 6 was categorized as the mild group (mild activity) and SLEDAI-2 K ≥ 6 was categorized as the active group (moderate-severe activity). The disease of the two groups mentioned above were assessed using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) and the SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), respectively. Furthermore, we used complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) in the kidney as the standard for efficacy evaluation for LN patients. RESULTS: After 52 weeks of treatment with belimumab, patients' complement levels increased significantly (p < 0.05); Other indicators such as 24-hour urine protein quantification and daily glucocorticoids dose decreased compared to pretreatment (p < 0.05). At 52 weeks, (i) after evaluation, the whole group of patients showed significant improvement in their condition; (ii) 55.4% of patients achieved LLDAS and 23.8% achieved DORIS remission; (iii) 73.2% of patients with LN achieved CR, 16.1% achieved PR. Adverse reactions were observed in 15 patients (14.9%), all of which normalized after symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In general, during treatment with belimumab, immunological and biochemical indices improved in SLE patients, urinary protein levels were reduced in LN patients, and the rate of renal function remission was effectively increased; At the same time, the use of belimumab is associated with a low frequency of side effects, good overall tolerability and a favorable safety profile.

Belimumab in early systemic lupus erythematosus: A propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of belimumab in patients with early systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), defined as having a disease duration of less than 6 months. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with SLE in the early stage who received belimumab and standard of care (belimumab group) or standard of care alone (control group) since September 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce potential bias. The primary endpoint was lupus low disease activity status (LLDAS) at weeks 12 and 24. The secondary endpoints were remission and the proportion of glucocorticoid dose tapering to 7.5 mg/day. The efficacy of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis was also assessed. RESULTS: Out of 111 eligible patients, 16 patients in the belimumab group and 31 patients in the control group were identified by 1:2 PSM. At week 24, a significantly higher proportion of individuals achieved low disease activity state (LLDAS) in the belimumab group compared to the control group (56.3% vs. 19.4%, OR = 5.357, 95% CI = 1.417 to 20.260, p = 0.013). Furthermore, more patients in the belimumab group were reduced to low-dose glucocorticoid ( ≤ 7.5 mg/day) at week 24 (75.0% vs. 35.5%, OR = 5.182, 95%CI = 1.339 to 20.058, p = 0.017). Significant improvements in Patient Global Assessment scores were observed at Week 12 and 24 for those treated with belimumab compared to controls. In a subgroup analysis evaluating the efficacy of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis, 42.9% of the seven individuals treated with belimumab achieved a complete renal response (CRR) by Week 24, and no instances of disease relapse were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In SLE patients with a disease duration of less than 6 months, belimumab treatment can promote LLDAS achievement and reduce glucocorticoid dose, leading to a better prognosis. Introducing belimumab in the early stage of SLE may be a beneficial decision.

TNFSF13B rs9514828 C>T Polymorphism is Associated with Incidence of Atherosclerosis and Therapeutic Outcomes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with numerous clinical manifestations. Organ involvement can aggravate patients with SLE and cause comorbidities such as atherosclerosis. Recently, the TNFSF13B gene has been found to be linked with SLE events. This study aimed to analyze the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of the TNFSF13B rs9514828 with incidence of atherosclerosis and therapeutic outcomes in patients with SLE. Patients and Methods: This case-control study included 84 SLE patients, of whom 21 patients with SLE with atherosclerosis and 63 patients with SLE without atherosclerosis. Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, interleukin-6 and interferon gamma levels were quantified. The TNFSF13B gene polymorphism was evaluated using polymerase chain reaction followed by sequencing. The lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) criteria were used to measure the therapeutic outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted using binary logistic regression. Results: The genetic variations of TNFSF13B rs9514828 were CC = 35, CT = 41, and TT = 8. There was an association between TNFSF13B rs9514828 C>T polymorphism in patients with SLE with and without atherosclerosis (p = 0.03; odds ratio (OR) 4.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-18.37). Furthermore, the TNFSF13B rs9514828 C>T polymorphism had association with the therapeutic outcomes of patients with SLE who manifested with LLDAS (p = 0.00; OR 7.58, 95% CI 2.61-21.99). Conclusion: The association of TNFSF13B rs9514828 C>T polymorphism and incidence of atherosclerosis as well as the therapeutic outcomes in patients with SLE indicate the potential utility of the gene variation as screening tool to employ personalized medicine to undertake preventive measures in order to prevent atherosclerosis and to predict a poor prognosis in SLE patient.

Can the Dose of Belimumab be Reduced in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus?

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of dose reduction in patients with SLE treated with belimumab (BEL) in Spain, analyze treatment modalities, and determine impact on control of disease activity. METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal and multicentre study of SLE patients treated with BEL. Data on disease activity, treatments and outcomes were recorded before and after reduction (6-12 months), and they were compared. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included. The dose was reduced in 29 patients (8.9%). The dosing interval was increased in 9 patients receiving subcutaneous BEL and in 6 patients receiving intravenous BEL. The dose per administration was reduced in 16 patients.Pre-reduction status was remission (2021 DORIS) in 15/26 patients (57.7%) and LLDAS in 23/26 patients (88.5%). After reduction, 2/24 patients (8.3%) and 3/22 patients (13.6%) lost remission at 6 months and 12 months, respectively (not statistically significant [NS]). As for LLDAS, 2/23 patients (8.7%) and 2/21 patients (9.5%) lost their status at 6 and 12 months, respectively (NS). Significantly fewer patients were taking glucocorticoids (GCs) at their 12-month visit, although the median dose of GCs was higher at the 12-month visit (5 [0.62-8.75] vs 2.5 [0-5] at baseline). CONCLUSION: Doses of BEL can be reduced with no relevant changes in disease activity-at least in the short term-in a significant percentage of patients, and most maintain the reduced dose. However, increased clinical or serologic activity may be observed in some patients. Consequently, tighter post-reduction follow-up is advisable.

Thorough assessment of the effectiveness of belimumab in a large Spanish multicenter cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview on the current use of belimumab (BLM) in SLE patients in clinical practice and to examine its efficacy in terms of standardized outcomes, drug survival, as well as patient and safety profiles. METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective multicentre cohort including SLE patients treated with BLM at 18 Spanish centers. Data was collected upon initiation of BLM, at 6 and 12 months after initiation, and at the last recorded visit. Changes in SLEDAI-2K, the proportion of patients who achieved LLDAS and DORIS 2021, and number of flares were compared between visits. Changes in damage, glucocorticoids use and employment status pre-BLM and post-BLM were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 3.8 (±2.7) years. LLDAS was attained by 45.8%, 62% and 71% of patients, and DORIS by 24%, 36.2% and 52.5% on successive visits, respectively. Twenty-seven-point two percent of patients were in DORIS ≥ 50% of the visits and a 46% in LLDAS-50. Flares and number of flares were significantly lower one year after treatment with BLM and no changes in damage accrual were observed. Mean (±SD) prednisone dose was significantly reduced over time, with 70 (24%) patients discontinuing GC. CONCLUSION: Our study not only demonstrates belimumab´s efficacy in attaining treat-to-target goals in SLE patients, but also confirms its GC-sparing effect, and its prevention of flares and organ damage accrual.

Is it safe to withdraw low-dose glucocorticoids in SLE patients in remission?

Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain a cornerstone of the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Numerous studies have emphasized the risk of damage accrual in SLE patient treated with GC, but currently, it is not possible to dissociate favorable and undesirable effects of GCs because their underlying mechanisms are entangled at the molecular level. Here, we review whether available data suggest that it is possible, feasible and desirable to taper and discontinue GC treatment in SLE. The main potential concern with GC withdrawal is the risk of SLE flare, which is strongly associated with increased organ damage, mortality, healthcare costs, decreased quality of life and work productivity. While most studies have assumed the cut off point for low doses (e.g. 7.5/mg/d) as the limit for safety, it is still controversial whether lower doses may influence damage accrual long-term. Also, a recent randomized trial has shown that a daily dose of 5 mg of prednisone in SLE patients in short-term remission can prevent up to 50-75% of flares, with an acceptable safety profile. However, this treatment is not mandatory for all patients. Yet, several observational studies highlight that discontinuation of GC is associated with lower damage accrual. Currently, we do not have a reliable method to identify patients who may require long-term low-dose GC. Therefore, further research is needed to identify a subgroup at high risk of relapse who would benefit from continuing prednisone. In the meantime, when considering the discontinuation of very low-dose prednisone, the decision must be individualized, as HCQ and conventional immunosuppressive agents are not without risk of side effects.

Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE: Are we there yet?

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a great heterogenicity in course and clinical manifestations. Although prognosis improved in the last decades of the 20th century, mortality remains higher than in the general population and uncontrolled disease activity and therapy-related adverse effects have been identified as major contributors to damage accrual and poor outcomes. Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE represents a great challenge even to the expert rheumatologist. Global disease activity indices are tools developed to assess activity across multiple organ systems. Several disease activity indices have been developed over the years, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, and knowing them is essential for understanding research studies, such as clinical trials, in which they are used. Organ-specific activity indices have been developed concurrently to represent organ involvement such as glomerulonephritis, cutaneous and musculoskeletal lupus manifestations. Regarding damage, the SLICC/ACR damage index has proven to be an effective tool for damage accrual assessment, yet not devoid of drawbacks. This review provides an overview of the most frequently utilized indices developed for the assessment of activity and damage in SLE highlighting their pros and cons when applied to the research and clinical setting.

Targeting DORIS Remission and LLDAS in SLE: A Review.

Remission is the established therapeutic goal for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is currently defined by the widely adopted Definition Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) criteria. Attainment of remission is rare in the clinical setting, thus an alternative, pragmatic treatment target of low disease activity, as defined by the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), provides a less stringent and more attainable treatment goal for a wider proportion of patients compared with DORIS remission. Randomized controlled trials and real-world analyses have confirmed the positive clinical benefits of achieving either DORIS remission or LLDAS. The treat-to-target (T2T) approach utilizes practical clinical targets to proactively tailor individual treatment regimens. Studies in other chronic inflammatory diseases using the T2T approach demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes and quality-of-life measures compared with established standard of care. However, such trials have not yet been performed in patients with SLE. Here we review the evolution of DORIS remission and LLDAS definitions and the evidence supporting the positive clinical outcomes following DORIS remission or LLDAS attainment, before discussing considerations for implementation of these outcome measures as potential T2T objectives. Adoption of DORIS remission and LLDAS treatment goals may result in favorable patient outcomes compared with established standard of care for patients with SLE.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex disease that can affect many organs. It can lead to life-threatening complications and poor quality of life. As SLE is very different in each person, it can be challenging to measure disease activity. Doctors are encouraged to set clinical targets to tailor treatment for each patient. Clinical targets include scoring systems that measure disease improvement. Remission is an established clinical target. When a patient is in remission, disease activity is controlled, and the patient does not experience any symptoms. As remission is difficult to achieve, experts developed a more realistic yet still favorable state. This is the lupus low disease activity state, when lupus symptoms are minimal on stable therapy. Doctors use remission and low disease activity in clinical trials to compare existing SLE drugs with new treatments, including biologic drugs. Biologics target key parts of the immune system to help suppress SLE. In this review, we looked at recent clinical trials and found that biologic drugs can help patients achieve remission or low disease activity. Patients who achieved these clinical targets had slower disease progression and improved quality of life. Clinical trials in SLE should continue to use remission and low disease activity targets to help compare treatments. Doctors are encouraged to use them in their routine clinics as treatment targets to measure SLE disease control. Low disease activity state may be particularly helpful as an initial target for patients who are not yet in remission.

Effectiveness and Safety of Belimumab in Chinese Lupus Patients: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study.

Objective: The effectiveness and safety of belimumab in Chinese lupus patients with different disease activities were investigated in a real-world setting. Method: Patients who received 10 mg/kg belimumab intravenously on weeks 0, 2, and 4, and then every 4 weeks on a background of standard-of-care (SoC) therapy and had a follow-up of more than 6 months were enrolled from four centers in China. They were stratified according to the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score at baseline as the moderate/severe (SELENA-SLEDAI > 6) or mild subgroups (SELENA-SLEDAI ≤ 6). Attainment of the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) or remission on treatment was analyzed in all patients. The SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) were evaluated for patients with moderate/severe disease and mild disease, respectively. Patients in the control arm with SoC alone from previous metformin lupus trials were selected by propensity score matching (PSM) as the reference group. Results: 224 SLE patients with a mean follow-up of 11.7 months receiving belimumab were enrolled in this observational study, of which 126 and 98 were in the moderate/severe and mild subgroup, respectively. At 12 months, 54.76% of the patients attained LLDAS and 28.57% attained remission. Lower daily prednisone at baseline were independently associated with 12-month LLDAS. Further, 87% of the subgroup with moderate/severe disease achieved SRI-4 at 12 months and a high SLEDAI at baseline was its predictive factor. For the mild subgroup, a reduced flare rate was observed compared with PSM reference (17.5%, vs. 38.6%, p = 0.021). Infection events, particularly viral infections and pneumonia were recorded in 7 and 6 patients, respectively. Conclusion: Our real-world data supported the effectiveness and safety of belimumab in Chinese lupus patients.

Outcomes of achieving lupus low disease activity state and damage accrual in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: At present, the treat-to-target approach has been proposed with the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) as an achievable target. OBJECTIVES: To determine damage accrual and baseline clinical characteristics associated with achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the largest university-based tertiary referral center in Thailand. Data of c-SLE patients (≤ 18 years) at diagnosis who were followed ≥ 12 months during January 2009 to December 2019 were collected. SLE disease status was categorized into LLDAS and non-optimally controlled state. SLEDAI-2K score was used to assess disease activity. Damage accrual was assessed by a pediatric version of the SLICC/ACR damage index. RESULTS: A total of 232 c-SLE patients (85.8% female) were included. At 12 months of treatment, 109 (47%) patients achieved LLDAS. Damage accrual was observed in 93 (40.1%) patients at the mean follow-up time of 6.2 ± 3.7 years. Damage accrual was significantly lower in patients who achieved LLDAS within 12 months than in those non-optimally controlled (p = 0.002). The median time to achieving LLDAS was 12.6 months (95%CI: 11.19-13.97). The median time to achieving LLDAS was significantly shorter in those without renal involvement (10.8 months, 95%CI: 9.62-12.00 vs. 15.6 months, 95%CI: 13.76-17.52, respectively; p = 0.044). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed absence of renal involvement as the predictor of achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment (aOR: 2.430, 95%CI: 1.420-4.158; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment was associated with lower damage accrual. Absence of renal involvement was the predictor of achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment. Key Points • LLDAS is a promising and achievable treatment target in c-SLE. • Achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment is associated with lower damage accrual. • Absence of renal involvement is the predictor of achieving LLDAS within 12 months of treatment.

Does expert opinion match the definition of lupus low disease activity state? Prospective analysis of 500 patients from a Spanish multicentre cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To apply the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) definition within a large cohort of patients and to assess the agreement between the LLDAS and the physician's subjective evaluation of lupus activity. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective multicentre study of SLE patients. We applied the LLDAS and assessed whether there was agreement with the clinical status according to the physician's opinion. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients [92% women; mean age 50.4 years (s.d. 3.7)] were recruited and 304 (62.7%) patients were in the LLDAS. According to physician assessment, 430 (86.1%) patients were classified as remission or low activity. Overall agreement between both evaluations was 71.4% (95% CI: 70.1, 70.5) with a Cohen's κ of 0.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.22-0.37]. Most cases (96.1%) in the LLDAS were classified as remission or low activity by the expert. Of the patients who did not fulfil the LLDAS, 126 (70.4%) were classified as having remission/low disease activity. The main reasons for these discrepancies were the presence of new manifestations compared with the previous visit and a SLEDAI 2K score >4, mainly based on serological activity. CONCLUSIONS: Almost two-thirds of SLE patients were in the LLDAS. There was a fair correlation between the LLDAS and the physician's evaluation. This agreement improves for patients fulfilling the LLDAS criteria. The discordance between both at defining lupus low activity, the demonstrated association of the LLDAS with better outcomes and the fact that the LLDAS is more stringent than the physician's opinion imply that we should use the LLDAS as a treat-to-target goal.

Predictors of infection requiring hospitalization in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a time-to-event analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictors of serious infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Serious infections were identified in SLE patients in a prospectively-followed single centre cohort. Associations of serious infection with disease-related variables and medication use were analysed using Cox and related regression models. RESULTS: 346 patients were followed for a mean (SD) of 6.6 (3.7) years. 86 episodes of serious infection were observed, with an incidence rate of 3.8 episodes per 100 person-years. Patients who had serious infection had higher baseline SLE Damage Index (SDI) and Charlston Comorbidity Index (CCI); they were also more likely to have high disease activity status (HDAS), and higher disease activity in multiple clinical domains, higher flare rates, higher time-adjusted prednisolone dose exposure, and less time in lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS). Patients who have received cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate were more likely to have experienced serious infection. After multivariable adjustment in Cox regression analysis, cyclophosphamide, higher SDI score, and higher disease activity were associated with an increased hazard of first serious infection. History of previous serious infection conferred the highest risk. Lymphopenia was also a modest but statistically significant predictor of serious infection. CONCLUSION: History of previous serious infection was the strongest predictor of serious infection in our SLE cohort. This study also suggests that clinical factors such as damage accrual, disease activity, and choice of immunosuppressant, can each have an independent risk in predicting serious infection particularly the first episode.

Definition of low disease activity state based on the SLE-DAS: derivation and validation in a multicentre real-life cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To derive and validate a definition of low disease activity (LDA) for SLE based on the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS), in a real-life multicentre cohort of SLE patients. METHODS: Derivation was conducted using data from a monocentric cohort of SLE (Portugal), and validation was performed in a multicentre cohort (Italy, France and Spain). The Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) was used as comparator. We applied receiver operating characteristics curve analysis against the LLDAS to determine the cut-off of SLE-DAS for LDA using bootstrap methodology. In a second step, we tested a definition of SLE-DAS LDA that included: (i) the statistically derived SLE-DAS upper threshold for LDA and (ii) prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day. In the multicentre validation cohort, we assessed the classification performance of this SLE-DAS LDA definition. RESULTS: We included 774 patients, 300 in the derivation and 474 in the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, the optimal cut-off to identify patients in LLDAS was SLE-DAS ≤2.48, presenting an area under the curve of 0.965 (95% CI 0.935, 0.994). When applied to the multicentre validation cohort, the SLE-DAS LDA definition showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and a specificity of 97.7% for LLDAS and an almost perfect agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.933; P < 0.001). McNemar's test found no significant differences between the two definitions (P = 0.092). CONCLUSION: The SLE-DAS LDA is a validated, accurate and easy-to-use definition for classifying SLE patients in LDA state.

Low disease activity state in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of achieving The Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) in children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) for tracing pertinent treatment modalities. METHODS: A total of 122 juvenile-onset SLE (jSLE) patients from six pediatric rheumatology centers in Turkey were enrolled in the study. LLDAS-50 was defined as encountering LLDAS for at least 50% of the observation time. According to the achievement of LLDAS-50, clinical features, immunological profiles, and treatments of patients with jSLE have been revealed. RESULTS: LLDAS of any duration was achieved by 82% of the cohort. Although only 10.8% of the patients achieved remission, 68.9% reached LLDAS-50. A significant difference was found between patients who reached LLDAS-50 and those who did not, in terms of the time to reach low-dose corticosteroid treatment (p = 0.002), the presence of subacute cutaneous findings (p = 0.007), and the presence of proteinuria (p = 0.002). Both of the groups were under similar treatment approaches. However, the number of patients being treated with corticosteroids at the last visit was found to be significantly higher in patients who achieved LLDAS-50 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Targeting LLDAS in jSLE, even with long-term, low-dose corticosteroid use, seems to be an achievable goal in clinical practice.

Impaired hand function and performance in activities of daily living in systemic lupus erythematosus, even in patients achieving lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS).

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine hand function and performance in activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with SLE vs healthy controls, and any associations with demographic and disease-related characteristics. METHODS: Hand function (grip strength, pinch strength and dexterity) and ADL performance were evaluated in 240 patients with SLE and 122 age- and biological sex-matched healthy controls. Grip strength, pinch strength and dexterity were measured by Jamar dynamometer, pinch gauge and Purdue pegboard test, respectively. Self-reported ADL performance was assessed by disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and HAQ. Regression analysis was performed to assess the determinants of hand dysfunction. RESULTS: All hand function and ADL performance variables were significantly impaired in the entire SLE cohort and the subgroup of patients achieving lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS; n = 157) compared with healthy subjects (P < 0.05). Joint pain, often underestimated in SLE, was the major determinant of hand function and ADL performance in multiple regression models. In addition, age was correlated with grip strength and Purdue scores, gender with grip strength, arthritis with DASH and HAQ, and use of immunosuppressives with DASH, HAQ and grip strength. Likewise, in patients in LLDAS, painful joints were correlated with DASH and HAQ, age with grip strength and Purdue (P < 0.001), gender with grip strength, and immunosuppressives with HAQ and grip strength. CONCLUSION: Hand function and performance of daily activities are significantly impaired in SLE, even in patients who achieve LLDAS, suggesting the need for their evaluation and management in clinical practice.

Validity of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity score (SLE-DAS) for definition of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS).

INTRODUCTION: SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS) is a novel, rapid, continuous and comprehensive score that overcomes the drawbacks of SLEDAI-2 K. Low lupus disease activity state (LLDAS) has been targeted as an endpoint in many clinical trials and as a favourable outcome in clinical practice. Therefore, our objective in the current study is to evaluate the validity of SLE-DAS for defining LLDAS as an objective in the treat-to-target strategy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 117 SLE patients who were diagnosed according to Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria for SLE. Patients were evaluated for disease activity by both SLEDAI-2 K and SLE-DAS. Additionally, patients were divided according to the SLEDAI-2 K-derived LLDAS definition into two groups: low disease activity (LDA) group and high disease activity (HDA) group. The validity of SLE-DAS for the definition of LLDAS was evaluated in comparison to SLEDAI-2 K. RESULTS: SLE-DAS shows highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.743, p < 0.001) with SLEDAI-2 K. The ROC curve revealed that SLE-DAS is valid for the assessment of activity with the best detection of LLDAS was at 6.62 with 95.5% sensitivity, 79.3% specificity and 89.6% accuracy. Moreover, it had a good agreement with the SLEDAI-2 K-derived definition of LLDAS (k = 0.765, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: SLE-DAS is a valid score for the definition of LLDAS which can be used in the clinical practice as a simple and precise standalone criterion. Key Points • Correlation between SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS revealed a high significance. • Identify SLE-DAS cut-off 6.62 for the definition of LLDAS. • There is a good agreement between SLEDAI-2K-derived definition of LLDAS and SLE-DAS definition.

Independent associations of lymphopenia and neutropenia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal, multinational study.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and associations of leucopenia in SLE remain incompletely understood. We evaluated associations of disease activity and medication use with leucopenia (lymphopenia and neutropenia) in a multinational, prospectively followed SLE cohort. METHODS: Data from the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration cohort, in which disease activity and medications were prospectively captured from 2013 to 2018, were used. Predictors of lymphopenia (lymphocyte count <0.8 × 109/l) and neutropenia (neutrophil count <1.5 × 109/l) were examined using multiple failure, time-dependent survival analyses. RESULTS: Data from 2330 patients and 18 287 visits were analysed. One thousand and eighteen patients (43.7%) had at least one episode of leucopenia; 867 patients (37.2%) had lymphopenia, observed in 3065 (16.8%) visits, and 292 (12.5%) patients had neutropenia, in 622 (3.4%) visits. After multivariable analyses, lymphopenia was associated with overall disease activity, ESR, serology, prednisolone, AZA, MTX, tacrolimus, CYC and rituximab use. MTX and ciclosporin were negatively associated with neutropenia. Lupus low disease activity state was negatively associated with both lymphopenia and neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Both lymphopenia and neutropenia were common in SLE patients but were differentially associated with disease and treatment variables. Lymphopenia and neutropenia should be considered independently in studies in SLE.

Remission in SLE-do DORIS criteria match the treating physician's judgment? A cross-sectional study to assess reasons for discordance.

OBJECTIVES: The definition of an accurate target for a treat-to-target approach in SLE has been challenging over past years, and recently the DORIS definitions of remission were presented by the international DORIS task force. It was our aim to assess the frequency of DORIS remission and LLDAS in our SLE cohort and their agreement with the treating physician's (DORIS-) independent remission judgement. Patient characteristics leading to lack of agreement and incoherence ought to be identified. METHODS: In this monocentric cross-sectional study, patients with SLE were enrolled and assessed between September 2016 and December 2017. DORIS remission definitions were applied and after the clinical consultation, the treating physicians gave his/her opinion on whether the patient was in remission. Regression analyses were performed to identify parameters influencing physician remission. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were included (87.6% female); 99 (42.5%) patients fulfilled any of the four DORIS remission definitions, while 126 patients were in remission according to their physician's judgement. We observed discordance in the assessment of remission in 53 patients (22.7%). Physician remission was influenced by disease activity [odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.90], disease and/or treatment-related damage (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.98) and the presence of ds-DNA antibodies (OR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.06, 6.04). CONCLUSIONS: DORIS remission proved an achievable target in our outpatient clinic. Still we found discordance regarding DORIS remission and the treating physician's judgement with a greater number of patients considered in remission by their physicians.

Articular involvement, steroid treatment and fibromyalgia are the main determinants of patient-physician discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Remission or the lowest possible disease activity is the main target in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Anyway, conflicting data are present in the literature regarding the correlation between physician-driven definitions and patient perception of the disease. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the definition of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, monocentric study. Adult SLE patients were included. For each patient, demographics, disease duration, medications, comorbidities, organ damage, active disease manifestations and SELENA-SLEDAI were assessed. Patients have been categorised as follows: LLDAS, remission and active disease. Each patient completed the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs): SF-36, LIT, FACIT-Fatigue and SLAQ. A SLAQ score < 6 (25° percentile of our cohort) was used as the cut-off value to define a low disease activity state according to patient self-evaluation. RESULTS: We enrolled 259 consecutive SLE patients (mainly female and Caucasian, mean age 45.33 ± 13.14 years, median disease duration 14 years). 80.3% were in LLDAS, of whom 82.2% were in remission; 19.7% were active. No differences emerged for any of the PROs used between the LLDAS and the active group. Considering the LLDAS subgroup, we identified 56 patients with a subjective low disease activity (SLAQ < 6) and we defined them as "concordant"; the remaining 152 patients in LLDAS presented a subjective active disease (SLAQ ≥ 6) and were defined "discordant". Discordant patients presented more frequently ongoing and past joint involvement (p < 0.05) and a diagnosis of fibromyalgia (p < 0.01); furthermore, they were more likely to be on glucocorticoid therapy (p < 0.01). Discordant patients showed a significantly poorer HRQoL, assessed by all PROs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Joint involvement, glucocorticoid therapy and comorbid fibromyalgia resulted to be the most important variables determining the poor concordance between patient and physician perspective on the disease.

Frequencies and predictors of the Lupus Low Disease Activity State and remission in treatment-naïve patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the attainability of Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and definitions of remission in SLE (DORIS) in a treatment-naïve cohort of SLE. METHODS: LLDAS5 was defined as LLDAS with a prednisone dose ≤5 mg/day. There were four definitions in DORIS: clinical remission on treatment (RONT), complete RONT, clinical remission off treatment (ROFT) and complete ROFT. The treatment-naïve patients from Peking University First Hospital SLE cohort were enrolled. The time to each state and their annual cumulative probabilities were estimated. The frequencies of patients who achieved each component of LLDAS or DORIS during follow-up were determined. The predictors of time to each state were identified. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 4.48 years. Respectively, 190 (87.2%), 160 (73.4%), 148 (67.9%), 94 (43.1%), 23 (10.6%) and 18 (8.3%) patients achieved LLDAS, LLDAS5, clinical RONT, complete RONT, clinical ROFT and complete ROFT. The median time to LLDAS, LLDAS5, clinical RONT and complete RONT were 1.4, 2.3, 2.6 and 4.7 years, respectively. Positive anti-dsDNA, RP and anaemia were significantly associated with prolonged time to LLDAS, LLDAS5 or clinical RONT. CONCLUSION: Our data confirmed that LLDAS is an attainable early treatment target for SLE. Though with more difficulty, RONT can be achieved in two-thirds of our patients. ROFT may not be an ideal treatment target at present as it is only attained in few patients.