Surgical Outcomes after Laparoscopic Repairs of Para-colostomy Hernia and Para-ileal-conduit Hernia: A Comparative Study.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes between para-colostomy hernia (PCH) and para-ileal-conduit hernia (PICH) after laparoscopic repairs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 41 laparoscopic parastomal hernia repairs performed at the Jikei University Daisan Hospital between June 2012 and September 2023. The data were divided into PCH (n=31) and PICH (n=10) groups and compared. Results: The comparison of patient backgrounds and hernia characteristics showed no significant differences between PCH and PICH groups. Surgical procedures included laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair (LSB) for PCH (29 cases) and PICH (8 cases), and endoscopic Pauli repair (ePauli) for both PCH (2 cases) and PICH (2 cases). Intraoperative findings indicated a significantly higher rate of severe intra-abdominal adhesions (Zühlke index III/IV) in the PICH group (60%) compared to the PCH group (23%) (p=0.0485). The median operation time was significantly longer for PICH (223 [120-423] minutes) than for PCH (158 [48-386] minutes) (p=0.0467). Perioperative complications occurred in 1 PCH case (3%) and 2 PICH cases (20%), with no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay (9 [4-19] vs. 9 [6-14] days). With the follow-up period of 57 [2-110] months for PCH and 52 [20-104] months for PICH, recurrence was observed in 4 PCH cases (12%) but not statistically significant. Conclusions: The comparison of PCH and PICH suggests that PICH is associated with more severe intra-abdominal adhesions and longer operation times, indicating higher operative difficulty. Therefore, it would be advisable to discuss the surgical outcomes of repair for these stomas separately.

A feasible procedure for laparoscopic cesarean scar defect repair.

In 1995, Morris first described cesarean scar defect as an "isthmocele" by macroscopy following hysterectomy in women with prior cesarean delivery. Cesarean scar defect is associated with gynecological symptoms such as abnormal uterine bleeding, secondary infertility, pelvic pain, and obstetrical complications such as cesarean scar pregnancy, placenta accreta, and uterine rupture. Surgical treatment techniques include hysteroscopic resection, transabdominal repair (laparotomy, laparoscopic, and robotic), and vaginal repair. If the residual myometrial thickness is <3 mm and a patient is symptomatic, consideration is made for defect repair from above rather than hysteroscopic resection. The advantages of laparoscopic repair include anatomic restoration of myometrial thickness, correction of uterine retroflexion, exploration of other causes of infertility and pelvic pain, and pathological diagnosis of scar tissue with endometriosis. Cesarean scar defect often cannot be visualized on the side of the abdominal cavity; therefore, it is difficult to identify the extent of the defect laparoscopically. Herein, we introduce laparoscopic cesarean scar defect repair through a surgical video with narration. This technique uses a uterine manipulator to distend and help delineate the defect, and a laparoscopic support suture within the defect as a "handle" to place the scar tissue on tension to ensure complete resection of the fibrotic tissue. Temporary uterine artery occlusion can be included to reduce bleeding in the surgical field to support visualization for complete fibrotic tissue removal and to achieve good apposition with a double-layer suture to promote proper anatomic wound healing. Symptom relief was achieved, and the patient became pregnant one year postoperatively. This video demonstrated a feasible, safe, effective procedure for laparoscopic cesarean scar defect repair in the patient.

Right sided posterior diaphragmatic hernia with liver incarceration: A case report.

Right sided posterior diaphragmatic hernias are a rare diagnosis, especially in adult populations. This patient presented with right thoracic pain for 20 years before investigation. Imaging has provided an accurate diagnosis in this case. Repair can be done safely laparoscopically.

Foreign Body Ingestion Ending Up in Late-Presenting Morgagni Hernia Diagnosis: A Case Report.

Morgagni hernia (MH), also known as a retrosternal or parasternal hernia, is a rare type of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) characterized by a defect in the anterior diaphragm. Patients with late-diagnosed MH typically present with vague gastrointestinal or respiratory symptoms. In some instances, MH is incidentally identified through chest X-rays performed for other reasons, such as foreign body ingestion, as illustrated in our presented case. We present a case of a delayed congenital diaphragmatic hernia of the Morgagni type in a two-year-old boy with a history of foreign body ingestion and severe abdominal pain. Diagnostic imaging, including chest radiograph and computed tomography (CT) scan, confirmed the diaphragmatic defect. Surgical repair, performed laparoscopically, resulted in an uncomplicated postoperative course and a favorable long-term outcome.

The Partial Iliopubic Tract Resection Technique for Incarcerated Femoral Hernia: A Case Series and a Literature Review.

Femoral hernias have a high incarceration rate, often necessitating urgent surgical intervention. In this report, we present a safe and reproducible laparoscopic technique for incarcerated femoral hernias with bowel involvement, including repair. Between December 2022 and May 2023, three female patients with incarcerated femoral hernias underwent urgent laparoscopic surgery. All patients presented with abdominal pain and were diagnosed with small bowel incarceration using computed tomography. Under laparoscopy, we confirmed intestinal incarceration and performed a standard transabdominal preperitoneal approach to identify the hernia defects. The iliopubic tract on the abdominal side of the hernia defect was carefully dissected using an energy device to enlarge the hernia orifice. A spontaneous reduction of the incarcerated intestine was achieved. After confirming the absence of bowel perforation, mesh was placed to repair the hernia. Following peritoneal closure, the affected part of the intestine was extracorporeally resected and anastomosed. We performed this technique on three patients, all of whom were later discharged without complications. In conclusion, for incarcerated femoral hernias with bowel obstruction, laparoscopic partial division of the iliopubic tract enables an easy, safe, and reproducible approach to incarceration release and subsequent hernia repair.

Laparoscopic repair of Morgagni hernia by primary closure with extra-abdominal suture: a case report and review of the literature.

We report a case of a Morgagni hernia repaired by primary closure with an extra-abdominal suture. Moreover, we reviewed cases of laparoscopically repaired Morgagni hernia, in which the size of the hernia defect was known, to establish a size criterion for mesh utilization. An 87-year-old woman presented to our hospital with right upper abdominal pain and vomiting. She had no history of abdominal surgery or trauma. Chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) revealed a Morgagni hernia, with the stomach and transverse colon herniated into the right chest cavity. Initially, an endoscopic repair was performed for the herniated stomach due to her age, which was successful. However, she had a recurrence 2 days later, prompting us to perform a semi-emergent laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic examination revealed a Morgagni defect, with the omentum, transverse colon, and stomach herniated, with the stomach reduced by pneumoperitoneum. Fortunately, the herniated organs could be easily relocated into the abdomen with no adhesions. The hernia defect measured 6 x 3 cm. We performed primary closure with an extra-abdominal suture. No sac resection was performed. The operation lasted 98 min. Oral intake was initiated on postoperative day 1, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3 without complications. Chest radiography and CT scans at 1 month postoperatively showed no recurrence, and the patient remained asymptomatic at the 9-month follow-up examination. According to our review findings, primary closure is an efficient method for small hernia defects (rule of thumb: width, <4 cm; length, <7 cm).

Spigelian Hernia: A Rare Ventral Hernia.

Ventral hernias occur when abdominal contents or the peritoneum displace through a defect in the abdominal wall. Among these, spigelian hernias are an exceptionally rare subtype, representing 0.12% to 2% of all ventral hernias. This case study focuses on an 86-year-old female presenting with a ventral hernia, notably a spigelian hernia, lacking common predisposing factors. The study emphasizes the use of laparoscopic techniques for repair, aiming to offer insights into managing this infrequent hernia type and aiding clinical decision-making. Due to its low incidence and challenging diagnosis and identification, reports such as ours detailing both the clinical course and the operative steps can assist others in their clinical decision-making.

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal Repair of a Bilateral Inguinal Hernia in a Pediatric Female Patient in Pakistan: A Case Report.

Inguinal hernias, although a common occurrence, pose a significant threat to the surgical community on account of their complexity and socioeconomic consequences. Bilateral inguinal hernias, which are a rare subtype of inguinal hernias, in particular, are problematic since there are no existing definitive international guidelines for their repair. It is estimated that between 8% and 30% of inguinal hernia patients have bilateral hernias, but there is still no clarity as to whether a bilateral hernia represents a special type of inguinal hernia or two different hernias in one patient. The transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair (TAPP), totally extra-peritoneal repair (TEP), and Lichtenstein repair techniques are commonly employed depending on the resources and surgical expertise available, but there is a need to conduct large-scale, prospective, randomized-controlled trials to guide the formation of evidence-based guidelines that could be followed globally. Herein, we present the first known case of a bilateral inguinal hernia in a female pediatric patient repaired by the laparoscopic TAPP technique from Pakistan.

Surgical repair for a parahiatal hernia with an esophageal hiatal hernia: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: A parahiatal hernia (PH) is a rare diaphragmatic hernia (DH) adjacent to but separated from the esophageal hiatus. The surgical repair for PH needs primary suture closure or complicated hernioplasty and the addition of an anti-reflux procedure. This report describes a case of PH with a symptomatic esophageal hiatal hernia managed using three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old woman with back pain and breathlessness was referred to our hospital for a DH. Computed tomography showed a diaphragmatic defect on the left side of the esophageal hiatus. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 24-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring showed a symptomatic esophageal hiatal hernia. Laparoscopic repair for both hernias was performed using 3D laparoscopy. The DH orifice was located in the left crus of the diaphragm, and it was separated from the esophageal hiatus. These findings showed that this DH was a PH. The PH was repaired with primary suturing, and a hiatoplasty was performed. Toupet fundoplication was performed with a 270° posterior wrap of the gastric fornix. The patient has remained asymptomatic a year after surgery without any complications. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: 3D laparoscopy provides significant advantages in surgeries requiring precise suturing. PH repairs require complex procedures, including mesh repair or suturing. Approximately 44 % of PH cases also necessitate fundoplication. 3D laparoscopy was useful for the present case. CONCLUSIONS: A rare PH and a symptomatic type 1 hiatal hernia were repaired with 3D laparoscopy, which is helpful for PH treatment in cases requiring complicated procedures.

Morgagni Hernia: A Rare Presentation in a Young Adult.

Morgagni hernia is the rarest diaphragmatic hernia, occurring in only about 2% of all cases. Despite its infrequent presentation, it poses significant morbidity once the diagnosis is missed. We present a rare case of a young adult female with no predisposing factors who experienced dyspnea and retrosternal pain with unremarkable clinical findings. A posteroanterior view of the chest roentgenogram revealed a nonspecific triangular opacity at the right cardiophrenic angle. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax confirmed the suspicion of a right anteromedial diaphragmatic defect with omental herniation. Exploratory laparoscopic primary repair of the hernia orifice was performed with non-absorbable sutures. CT helps in confirming the condition, and surgical repair is recommended. Morgagni hernia can present as asymptomatic or with respiratory symptoms. There is no consensus on the type of approach, but a minimally invasive approach is being preferred even in asymptomatic cases.

Comparison between the open and the laparoscopic approach in the primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair underwent various developments in the previous decade. Laparoscopic primary ventral hernia repair may be an alternative to open repair since it prevents large abdominal incisions. However, whether laparoscopy improves clinical outcomes has not been systematically assessed. OBJECTIVES: The aim is to compare the clinical outcomes of the laparoscopic versus open approach of primary ventral hernias. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted in February 2023. All randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy with the open approach in patients with a primary ventral hernia were included. A fixed-effects meta-analysis of risk ratios was performed for hernia recurrence, local infection, wound dehiscence, and local seroma. Meta-analysis for weighted mean differences was performed for postoperative pain, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and time until return to work. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall hernia recurrence was twice less likely to occur in laparoscopy (RR = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.32-0.74; p < 0.001; I2 = 29%). Local infection (RR = 0.30; 95%CI = 0.19-0.49; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), wound dehiscence (RR = 0.08; 95%CI = 0.02-0.32; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), and local seroma (RR = 0.34; 95%CI = 0.19-0.59; p < 0.001; I2 = 14%) were also significantly less likely in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Severe heterogeneity was obtained when pooling data on postoperative pain, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and time until return to work. CONCLUSION: The results of available studies are controversial and have a high risk of bias, small sample sizes, and no well-defined protocols. However, the laparoscopic approach seems associated with a lower frequency of hernia recurrence, local infection, wound dehiscence, and local seroma.

Comparison of outcomes between preservation or division of the uterine round ligament in laparoscopic groin hernia repair in females: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the short-term and long-term outcomes in laparoscopic groin hernia repair with or without preservation of the uterine round ligament (URL) in females. METHODS: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and and CNKI databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, and retrospective comparative studies regarding preservation or division of the URL in laparoscopic groin hernia repair in females. Outcomes of interest were age, BMI, type of hernia, type of surgery, operating time, estimated blood loss, time of hospitalization, seroma, concomitant injury, mesh infection, recurrence, uterine prolapse, foreign body sensation, chronic pain, and pregnancy. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis were performed with Review Manager v5.3 and TSA software, respectively. RESULTS: Of 192 potentially eligible articles, 9 studies with 1104 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant difference in age (MD-6.58, 95% CI - 13.41 to 0.24; P = 0.06), BMI (MD 0.05, 95%CI - 0.31 to 0.40; P = 0.81), blood loss (MD-0.04, 95% CI - 0.75 to 0.66; P = 0.90), time of hospitalization (MD-0.22, 95% CI-1.13 to 0.69; P = 0.64), seroma (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.24; P = 0.23), concomitant injury (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.24; P = 0.68), mesh infection (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.61; P = 0.18), recurrence (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.18 to 7.25; P = 0.90), uterine prolapse(OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.07 to 6.94; P = 0.77), foreign body sensation (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.53 to 7.23; P = 0.32) and chronic pain(OR 1.03 95% CI 0.4 to 2.69; P = 0.95). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (MD 6.62, 95% CI 2.20 to 11.04; P = 0.0003) between the preservation group and division group. Trial sequential analysis showed that the cumulative Z value of the operating time crossed the traditional boundary value and the TSA boundary value in the third study, and the cumulative sample size had reached the required information size (RIS), indicating that the current conclusion was stable. CONCLUSION: In summary, laparoscopic groin hernia repair in women with the preservation of the round uterine ligament requires a longer operating time, but there was no advantage in short-term or long-term complications, and there was no clear evidence on whether it causes infertility and uterine prolapse.

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic techniques for incisional hernia repair. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane databases, and conference abstracts were systematically searched for studies that directly compared robot-assisted versus laparoscopy for incisional hernia repair and reported safety or efficacy outcomes in a follow-up of ≥ 1 month. The primary endpoints of interest were postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 2104 results, of which four studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included 1293 patients with incisional hernia repairs, 440 (34%) of whom underwent robot-assisted repair. Study follow-up ranged from 1 to 24 months. There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of postoperative complications (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.35-1.21; p = 0.17). The recurrence rate of incisional hernias (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.05-2.29; p = 0.27) was also similar between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. Hospital length of stay (MD - 1.05 days; 95% CI - 2.06, - 0.04; p = 0.04) was significantly reduced in the robotic-assisted repair. However, the robot-assisted repair had a significantly longer operative time (MD 69.6 min; 95% CI 59.0-80.1; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The robotic approach for incisional hernia repair was associated with a significant difference between the two groups in complications and recurrence rates, a longer operative time than laparoscopic repair, but with a shorter length of stay.

The surgical treatment of Morgagni hernias in adults: a systematic review for the standardization of laparoscopic surgical repair.

A Morgagni hernia is a congenital diaphragmatic hernia that is rarely diagnosed in adults, and the technique for its repair has not yet been standardized. This review will give an overview of the different laparoscopic methods reported by other authors, highlighting the key points indicating a good repair to help standardize the technique. A systematic review of the available articles on PubMed was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 by two authors independently in May 2022. Only articles written in English were included. A total of 180 case reports of laparoscopic Morgagni's hernia repair procedures were found; direct repair was performed in 59 patients, mesh was used in 119 patients, and mesh was not used in 2 patients. The hernia sac was removed in 71 patients, and the defect was closed before mesh placement in 49 patients. Nonabsorbable, dual or biologic mesh was used. The mean operative time was 92.65 min for direct repair and 84.11 min for mesh repair. One recurrence was reported in the direct repair series. The optimal method of repair has not yet been identified. The laparoscopic approach is associated to fewer complications and facilitates a faster recovery than the open approach. Several manoeuvres have been reported to help surgeons, who are not trained in laparoscopic knotting, perform extracorporeal knotting. Mesh should be placed when tension is too high after a direct repair or when primary closure cannot be achieved.

The INCH-trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing short- and long-term outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for incisional hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is increasingly performed worldwide and expected to be superior to conventional open repair regarding hospital stay and quality of life (QoL). The INCisional Hernia-Trial was designed to test this hypothesis. METHODS: A multicenter parallel randomized controlled open-label trial with a superiority design was conducted in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with primary or recurrent incisional hernias were randomized by computer-guided block-randomization to undergo either conventional open or laparoscopic repair. Primary endpoint was postoperative length of hospital stay in days. Secondary endpoints included QoL, complications, and recurrences. Patients were followed up for at least 5 years. RESULTS: Hundred-and-two patients were recruited and randomized. In total, 88 patients underwent surgery and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (44 in the open group, 44 in the laparoscopic group). Mean age was 59.5 years, gender division was equal, and BMI was 28.8 kg/m. The trial was concluded early for futility after an unplanned interim analysis, which showed that the hypothesis needed to be rejected. There was no difference in primary outcome: length of hospital stay was 3 (range 1-36) days in the open group and 3 (range 1-12) days in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.481). There were no significant between-group differences in QoL questionnaires on the short and long term. Satisfaction was impaired in the open group. Overall recurrence rate was 19%, of which 16% in the open and 23% in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.25) at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial, short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair were not superior to open surgery. The persisting high recurrence rates, reduced QoL, and suboptimal satisfaction warrant the need for patient's expectation management in the preoperative process and individualized surgical management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR2808.

Efficacy of a modified needle grasper for single-port laparoscopic hernia repair in children: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: The advantage of using the single-port technique over the conventional two-port approach is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) using a modified needle grasper in children and compare the results to those of two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (TLPEC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of SLPEC and TLPEC surgery from February 2016 to June 2021 was conducted at our institution. Pediatric patients underwent SLPEC using the modified needle grasper to complete the high ligation of the hernia sac, while operations in the conventional two-port group only used regular laparoscopic instruments. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Of 1320 patients, 1169 were included in the single-port/two-port crude evaluation, with 930 in the PSM cohort (465 patients/arm). Among 1:1 matched patients, the operation time for single-port patients vs. two-port patients were 11.28 ± 3.98 vs. 15.47 ± 4.54 min for unilateral repair and 16.86 ± 4.59 vs. 20.40 ± 4.29 min for bilateral repair (p < .05). Cosmetic results did not differ between the SLPEC and TLPEC groups (0% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.249). The recurrence rates were comparable between the two groups (0.6% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.725). Moreover, the differences in surgical site infection (SSI), testicular atrophy, open conversion and postoperative hydrocele occurrence were insignificant between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, the modified needle grasper is a safe and feasible instrument for SLPEC, and SLPEC using the needle grasper has a shorter operation time than TLPEC.

Outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia repair by open and laparoscopic approaches: a propensity score-matched comparison.

PURPOSE: Recurrent incisional hernias are challenging, and their surgical outcomes have not been well studied. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia repair in a propensity score-matched cohort study on laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh repair (lap. IPOM) versus open sublay repair. METHODS: All consecutive patients who had undergone open sublay repair and lap. IPOM of recurrent incisional hernia between January 2015 and December 2021 at a tertiary hernia center was identified. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to achieve a balanced exposure groups at baseline. RESULTS: Of 255 patients, 85/95 with open sublay repair were matched to 85/160 with lap. IPOM. Before matching, the open sublay group had significantly larger hernia defects (6.3 cm vs. 5.0 cm) than the lap. IPOM group. Other major baseline imbalances were also found in body mass index (BMI), obesity and European Hernia Society (EHS) width classification. The pre-match results showed that the lap. IPOM group had significantly shorter operative time (median 75 vs. 95 min) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (median 8 vs. 11 days) compared with the open sublay group. Wound infection (8.4% vs. 1.9%) and hematoma (5.3% vs. 0.6%) occurred more frequently after open sublay repair. After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The recurrence rate and incidence of complications were comparable between the two groups. However, the post-match analysis still showed that lap. IPOM was associated with decreased length of postoperative stay. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia surgery after lap. IPOM and open sublay repair appear similar, except that the former had shorter length of postoperative stay. However, the poor outcomes were more likely associated with the unfavorable risk profiles, such as larger defect size, rather than the procedure technique itself.

Cesarean scar disorder: Management and repair.

Cesarean scar disorder (CSD) is an entity recently defined as uterine niche with at least one primary or 2 secondary symptoms. CSDs can be visualized by hysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging, but diagnosis should be performed by exams able to measure the residual myometrial thickness (RMT). Although there is a limited number of studies evaluating fertility and reproductive outcomes after different types of surgery, the following consideration should be kept in mind. Asymptomatic women should not be operated with the hope of improving obstetrical outcomes. It is reasonable to consider hormone therapy for CSDs as a symptomatic treatment in women who no longer wish to conceive and have no contraindications. In case of failure of or contraindications to medical treatment, surgery should be offered according to the severity of symptoms, including infertility, the desire or otherwise to preserve the uterus, the size of the CSD, and RMT measurement. Hysteroscopy is considered to be more of a resection than a repair, so women who desire pregnancy should be excluded from this technique in case of RMT <3 mm. In this instance, repair is essential and can only be achieved by a laparoscopic or vaginal approach. The benefit of laparoscopic approach seems to persist after subsequent CS. Women with CSDs need to be given complete information, including available literature, before any treatment decision is made.

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for female patients with groin hernias.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) was recommended for female patients with groin hernias. Whereas, only a few studies focused on whether and how to preserve the round ligament of the uterus in TAPP. METHODS: Clinical data of 159 female patients with 181 groin hernias who underwent TAPP at a single institution in China from January 2016 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and collected. RESULTS: All the patients underwent the operation smoothly without conversion. Division of the round ligament was performed for 33 hernias. Preservation of the round ligament was adopted for 148 hernias, 51 with the "keyhole" technique, 86 with the "longitudinal incision of peritoneum" method, and 11 with total dissection of the round ligament. The mean operative time was 55.6 ± 8.7 min for unilateral TAPP and 99.1 ± 15.8 min for bilateral TAPP. The mean estimated blood loss was 7.1 ± 4.5 mL. The postoperative complications included 6 (3.3%) cases of seroma, 1 (0.5%) case of hematoma, and 3 (1.6%) cases of mild chronic pain. The incidences of chronic pelvic pain and genital prolapse seemed to be higher in the division group than in the preservation groups (6.1% vs. 0.6% and 3.0% vs. 0%, separately). However, no statistical difference was observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TAPP is feasible and effective for female patients with groin hernias, especially in preserving the round ligament of the uterus.