Impact of oncoplasty in increasing breast conservation rates Post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Introduction: The essential goal of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is to downstage the primary tumor making it amenable for breast conservation surgery (BCS). However, since the safety of this surgery is paramount, post-NACT breast conservation rates remain low. As per the recommendation of the 2018 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) overview of long-term post-NACT follow-up, we have devised a protocol for imaging, localization, rad-path analysis, and documentation of radiotherapy techniques to ensure the safety of post-NACT breast conservation. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of 180 breast cancer patients who received NACT and were operated on by a single surgical oncologist from 2015 to 2020. After selection based on published guidelines, patients were treated with neoadjuvant systemic (chemo or hormone) therapy. In cases where primary tumors responded and reduced to 1-2 cm in size mid-NACT, the residual tumors were localized by clips under ultrasound guidance and calcification was wire localized. All patients were treated using appropriate surgical and oncoplastic techniques where indicated. Negative margins were ensured by intra-operative rad-path analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were given as per protocol. Results: In 81 cases that required mastectomy at presentation, we were able to achieve a 72.8% post-NACT BCS rate with the help of oncoplasty. Overall, 142 of 180 (80%) patients were treated with breast conserving surgery of which 80% (121 of 142) were oncoplasty. Margins were assessed on intra-operative frozen and re-excised in the same setting. No positive margins were reported in final histopath of 142 breast conservation procedures. Post-operative complication rates after breast conservation in the first year were at 17% (24 of 142 including two major complications). Patient reported outcomes were satisfactory with increased satisfaction for breast conservation compared with immediate breast reconstruction. Discussion: Employing oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) techniques following stringent protocols for accurate localization of the residual tumor, intra-operative rad-path analysis, and adjuvant treatments, we show successful breast conservation in 72.8% of our mastectomy-qualified patients after downstaging by NACT. We also report satisfactory outcomes for post-NACT surgery, patient-reported satisfaction, and survival.

Navigating the learning curve with large and giant tumors: Initial experience with endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal resection of PitNETs.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has progressively become the preferred choice of surgical intervention for PitNETs. However, the adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa has been low. We report our initial experience with the utility of the EEA in PitNETs particularly in large and giant tumors despite limited resources. METHODS: The study was over a 73-month period at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Pre and post-operative clinical, imaging and neuro-ophthalmological findings were documented. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded. We compared the outcomes between the early 23 and later 22 patients. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test and Chi square test at α = 0.05. RESULTS: There were 45 patients; 25(55.6%) were males. Mean age was 49.9 ± 13.4 years. Visual symptoms predominated with 12(26%) blind in at least one eye. Median tumor volume was 20.9 cm3 and mean tumor diameter was 4.09 ± 0.89 cm. 31(68.9%) had gross or near total excision. Vision improved in 31(68.9%). There were 2 procedure related mortality from CSF leak/meningitis. The mean of the tumor diameter of the earlier patients was less than that of the latter (3.84 vs 4.40 cm, p = 0.04,). The latter group also had more gross or near total resections (26.8% versus 41.5%) but this was not statistically significant. There was no difference in postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: EEA remains a veritable option for PitNETs, including for large and huge tumors, even within resource challenged environments, with acceptable limits of complications.

Laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resection for large (≥ 50 mm) colorectal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients with large liver tumors (≥ 50 mm) have been considered for anatomic major hepatectomy. Laparoscopic resection of large liver lesions is technically challenging and often performed by surgeons with extensive experience. The current study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncologic safety of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resection in patients with large colorectal metastases. METHODS: Patients who primarily underwent laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resection (less than 3 consecutive liver segments) for colorectal liver metastases between 1999 and 2019 at Oslo University Hospital were analyzed. In some recent cases, a computer-assisted surgical planning system was used to better visualize and understand the patients' liver anatomy, as well as a tool to further improve the resection strategy. The surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients with large (≥ 50 mm) and small (< 50 mm) tumors were compared. Multivariable Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for survival. RESULTS: In total 587 patients met the inclusion criteria (large tumor group, n = 59; and small tumor group, n = 528). Median tumor size was 60 mm (range, 50-110) in the large tumor group and 21 mm (3-48) in the small tumor group (p < 0.001). Patient age and CEA level were higher in the large tumor group (8.4 µg/L vs. 4.6 µg/L, p < 0.001). Operation time and conversion rate were similar, while median blood loss was higher in the large tumor group (500 ml vs. 200 ml, p < 0.001). Patients in the large tumor group had shorter 5 year overall survival (34% vs 49%, p = 0.027). However, in the multivariable Cox-regression analysis tumor size did not impact survival, unlike parameters such as age, ASA score, CEA level, extrahepatic disease at liver surgery, and positive lymph nodes in the primary tumor. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resections for large colorectal liver metastases provide satisfactory short and long-term outcomes.

Trends and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly being utilized for the resection of gastrointestinal cancers. National trends for perioperative and oncologic outcomes of MIS for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are unknown. We hypothesized that with increased use of MIS, the perioperative outcomes and survival for GIST are preserved. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2010-2016) was utilized to assess perioperative and oncologic outcomes for GIST of the stomach and small bowel. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: Data from 8923 gastric and 3683 small bowel resections were analyzed. Over the study period, MIS became the prevalent modality for gastrectomies (2010: robotic: 2.4%, laparoscopic: 26.1%, open: 71.5% vs. 2016: robotic: 9.6%, laparoscopic: 48.8%, open: 41.6%; p < 0.001), with a smaller increase in enterectomies (2010: robotic: 1%, laparoscopic: 17.3%, open: 81.6% vs. 2016: robotic: 3.9%, laparoscopic: 27.2%, open: 68.9%; p < 0.001). Age and Charlson comorbidity index were similar among groups. MIS approaches were associated with fewer readmissions and lower 90 day mortality for gastrectomies and similar rates for enterectomies. MIS did not compromise patient survival even in patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment or harbored tumors ≥ 10 cm. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly being utilized for resection of gastric and small bowel GIST, with improved postoperative outcomes. In this retrospective review, overall survival after minimally invasive or open surgery was comparable, even in challenging scenarios of neoadjuvant treatment or large tumors (≥ 10 cm).

LITE SABR M1: A phase I trial of Lattice stereotactic body radiotherapy for large tumors.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an attractive treatment option for patients with metastatic and/or unresectable tumors, however its use is limited to smaller tumors. Lattice is a form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy that may allow safe delivery of ablative doses to bulky tumors. We previously described Lattice SBRT, which delivers 20 Gy in 5 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost to 66.7 Gy in a defined geometric arrangement (Lattice boost). The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the acute toxicity and quality of life (QoL) of patients with large tumors (>5 cm) treated with Lattice SBRT. METHODS: This was a single-arm phase I trial conducted between October 2019 and August 2020. Patients with tumors > 4.5 cm were eligible. Lattice SBRT was delivered every other day. The primary outcome was the rate of 90-day treatment-associated (probably or definitely attributable) grade 3 + acute toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria. Other outcomes included changes in patient reported toxicity and QoL inventories, GTV, and peripheral blood cytokines. RESULTS: Twenty patients (22 tumors) were enrolled. Median GTV was 579.2 cc (range: 54.2-3713.5 cc) in volume and 11.1 cm (range: 5.6-21.4 cm) in greatest axial diameter. Fifty percent of tumors were in the thorax, 45% abdomen/pelvis, and 5% extremity. There was no likely treatment-associated grade 3 + toxicity in the 90-day period (acute and sub-acute). There was one case of grade 4 toxicity possibly associated with Lattice SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: This phase I study met its primary endpoint of physician reported short-term safety. An ongoing phase II clinical trial of Lattice SBRT will evaluate late safety and efficacy of this novel technique.

Surgery in congenital lung malformations: the evolution from thoracotomy to VATS, 10-year experience in a single center.

BACKGROUND: Congenital lung malformation is an umbrella term and consist of various kind of parenchymal and mediastinal pathologies. Surgical resection is often required for diagnosis and curative treatment. We aimed to review our experience in surgical treatment for congenital lung disease and present the role of minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: Surgical resections performed for benign lesions of the lung and mediastinum between January 2009 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were found to have congenital lung malformation as a result of pathological examination were included in our study. Distribution characteristics of the patients according to congenital lung malformation subtypes, differences in surgical approach and postoperative results were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients who underwent surgical resection and were diagnosed with the bronchogenic cyst, sequestration, bronchial atresia, congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (CCAM), or enteric cyst as a result of pathological examination were included the study. There were no significant differences between pathological subtypes in the postoperative length of hospital stay and drainage duration however, perioperative complication rate was higher in the sequestration group. In addition, in the first three days postoperatively, the mean pain score was found to be lower in the VATS group compared to thoracotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Congenital lung malformations consist of a heterogeneous group of diseases and the surgical treatment in these patients can range from a simple cyst excision to pneumonectomy. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery should be considered as the first choice in the surgical treatment of these patients in experienced centers.

Eradication of large established tumors by drug-loaded bacterial particles via a neutrophil-mediated mechanism.

The treatment of large established tumors remains a significant challenge and is generally hampered by poor drug penetration and intrinsic drug resistance of tumor cells in the central tumor region. In the present study, we developed bacterial particles (BactPs) to deliver chemotherapeutics into the tumor mass by hijacking neutrophils as natural cell-based carriers. BactPs loaded with doxorubicin, 5-fluorosuracil, or paclitaxel induced significantly greater tumor regression than unconjugated drugs. This effect was mediated by the ability of BactPs to incorporate chemotherapeutics and serve as vascular disrupting agents that trigger innate host responses and recruit phagocytic neutrophils. Vascular disruption resulted in extensive cell death in the central areas of the tumor mass. Recruited neutrophils acted as natural cellular carriers to deliver engulfed BactPs, which ensured drug delivery into the tumor mass and cytotoxic effects in areas that are normally inaccessible to traditional chemotherapy. Thus, BactPs eradicate large established tumors by functioning as vascular disrupters and natural drug carriers for neutrophil-mediated chemotherapy.

Breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy in the surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma measuring 4 cm or greater.

BACKGROUND: The safety of breast conservation therapy (BCT) has not been demonstrated in large ILC tumors, potentially contributing to the higher mastectomy rates seen in ILC. METHODS: We queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients with ILC measuring ≥4 cm and evaluated difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) between those treated with BCT versus mastectomy using a multivariate model. RESULTS: Of 180 patients, 30 (16.7%) underwent BCT and 150 (83.3%) underwent mastectomy. Patients undergoing mastectomy were younger (56.6 vs. 64.3 years, p = 0.003) and had larger tumors (7.2 vs. 5.4 cm, p < 0.001). While tumor size, nodal stage, receptor subtype, and margin status were significantly associated with RFS, there was no difference in RFS at 5 (p = 0.88) or 10 (p = 0.65) years for individuals undergoing BCT versus mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ILC ≥4 cm, BCT provides similar tumor control as mastectomy, provided that negative margins are achieved.

Eye plaque brachytherapy versus enucleation for ocular melanoma: an analysis from the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: There is no current randomized data comparing the efficacy of brachytherapy and enucleation for patients with larger sized tumors. The purpose of the present study was to use a large, contemporary database to determine current practice patterns and compare survival outcomes between different management options for patients with choroidal melanoma of various sizes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2014) for histologically-confirmed choroidal melanoma for patients treated with brachytherapy versus enucleation. Chi-square test was used to compare categorized demographic and clinical variables in both arms. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards assessment determined variables associated with OS. Patients were divided into cohorts representing small, medium, and large tumors. Propensity scores matching (PSM) was utilized to compare more similar cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 7,096 patients met the selection criteria; 5,501 (78%) patients received brachytherapy and 1,595 (22%) patients were treated with enucleation. After PSM, 5-yr OS for small tumors was 87% vs. 64%, for medium tumors was 77% vs. 57%, and for large tumors was 68% vs. 46% for brachytherapy and enucleation, respectively (p < 0.001). Following PSM, multivariate Cox regression found older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51-2.06), more comorbidities (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.25-1.70), extraocular extension (EOE) (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.48), ciliary body invasion (CBI) (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02-1.40), and larger size (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.40-1.66) were negative prognosticators of survival. Brachytherapy was a positive prognosticator of survival (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.40-0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Patients selected for brachytherapy had improved survival compared to enucleation in all size cohorts. EOE and CBI are significantly higher in the enucleation cohort and are important negative prognosticators for survival selected against patients having brachytherapy. Brachytherapy is a reasonable treatment option for certain patients with large size tumors.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery vs Thoracotomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Greater Than 5 cm: Is VATS a feasible approach for large tumors?

BACKGROUND: VATS lobectomy is a recommended surgical approach for patients with early-stage lung cancer. However, it is still controversial in locally advance disease. This study was conducted to compare intraoperative and postoperative results of VATS and thoracotomy in patients with tumors greater than 5 cm. METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2018, 849 patients underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer at our center. The inclusion criterion of this study was patients who underwent anatomic lung resection for lung cancer with tumors larger than 5 cm((≥ T3). The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (n = 24) and those who underwent thoracotomy (n = 36). Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative results were evaluated by review of the hospital records. RESULTS: In the VATS group, mean drainage time and postoperative length of hospital stay were significantly shorter than the thoracotomy group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that overall and recurrence-free survival was longer in the VATS group and this result was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, we emphasize that VATS is a feasible surgical procedure for tumors larger than 5 cm.

Lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: advantages and drawbacks.

Lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (LRA) is performed mostly by urologists. It is gaining popularity among general surgeons because of the direct access to the adrenal gland. However, the management of large tumors remains controversial. We report our experience and discuss the advantages and the drawbacks of this approach. Between December 2011 and April 2015, 89 consecutive patients underwent LRA for adrenal tumors. Conversion to open surgery, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, intra-operative complications, early and late postoperative complications, and mortality were analyzed. The entire group was divided into patients with large tumors (> 5 cm) and patients with small tumors (≤ 5 cm), which were further compared. The conversion rate was 1.1%. The mean operative time was 107.4 ± 27.95 min, the mean blood loss 33.15 ± 25.45 ml. The mean hospital stay was 4.7 ± 2.05 days. Most of the complications were minor. There was zero mortality. Concerning the size of the tumor, we found statistically significant difference in operative time (p = 0.001), hospital stay (p = 0.020), incidence of early postoperative complications (p = 0.049), and conversion rate to open surgery (p = 0.037). LRA is a feasible, effective and safe procedure that offers additional advantages over the standard transabdominal approach because of its direct access to the adrenal gland. However, malignancy, large tumor size, bilateral pathology, and concomitant intra-abdominal pathology may represent a potential setback for this approach.

The effect of dose escalation for large squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal.

PURPOSE: Chemoradiation allows for organ preservation in patients with anal cancer, but patients with large tumors (> 5 cm) have elevated rates of locoregional recurrence. With conformal radiation techniques, there is interest in dose escalation to decrease local recurrence in patients with large tumor size. METHODS/PATIENTS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients with anal cancer from 2004 to 2013 with tumors > 5 cm. Adult patients who received definitive chemoradiation were included. Patients with prior resection were excluded. High dose was defined as greater than or equal to 5940 cGy. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 1349 patients were analyzed with 412 (30.5%) receiving high-dose radiation therapy (RT). 5-year OS was 58 and 60% for high and standard dose RT, respectively (p = 0.9887). On univariate analysis, high-dose RT was not associated with improved OS (HR = 0.998, CI 0.805-1.239, p = 0.9887). On multivariate analysis, high-dose RT (HR = 0.948, CI 0.757-1.187, p = 0.6420) was not associated with improved OS but older age (HR = 1.535, CI 1.233-1.911, p = 0.0001), male sex (HR = 1.695, CI 1.382-2.080, p < 0.0001), comorbidities (HR = 1.389, CI 1.097-1.759, p = 0.0064), and long RT (HR = 1.299, CI 1.047-1.611, p = 0.0173) were significantly associated with decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed difference in OS for dose escalation of anal cancers > 5 cm in this population-based analysis. Differences in local control and salvage therapy cannot be assessed through the NCDB. Whether dose escalation of large tumors may improve local control and colostomy-free survival remains an important question and is the subject of ongoing trials.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy validation for large tumors.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) remains under discussion for large size tumors. The aim of this work has been to study the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB for large tumors and predictive factors of false negative (FN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study of a multicentric cohort, involved patients presenting N0 breast cancer with a SLNB eventually completed by complementary axillary lymph node dissection (cALND). The main criteria were the FNR and the predictive factors of FN. RESULTS: 12.415 patients were included: 748 with tumors ≥30 mm, 1101 with tumors >20 and < 30 mm and 10.566 with tumors ≤20 mm, with a cALND respectively for 501 patients (67%), 523 (62.1%) and 2775 (26.3%). The FNR were respectively: 3.05% (IC95%: 1.3-4.8) for tumors ≥30 mm*, 3.5% (1.8-5.2) for tumors >20 and < 30 mm*, 1.8% (1-2.4) for tumors ≤20 mm (p < 0.05) (*Not significant). At multivariate analysis, SN number harvested ≤2 (OR:2.0, p = 0.023) and tumor size >20 and < 30 mm (OR:2.07, p = 0.017) were significant predictive factors of FN, without significant value for tumor size ≥30 mm (OR:1.83, p = 0.073). CONCLUSION: The FNR of SLNB was not higher amongst large size tumors compared to tumors of a smaller size. These results support the validation of SNLB for tumors up to 50 mm.

Use of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Measuring More Than 5 cm.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is currently not the guideline-recommended treatment for lung tumors measuring more than 5 cm. However, improvements in radiotherapy techniques have led to increasing use of SABR for larger tumors. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical outcomes in patients with a primary or recurrent NSCLC measuring more than 5 cm and treated with five or eight fractions of SABR at our center. Patients who had prior thoracic radiotherapy were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 63 consecutive patients with a median tumor diameter of 5.8 cm (range 5.1-10.4) were identified; 81% had T2N0 disease and 18% had T3N0 disease. The median Charlson comorbidity index was 2 (range 0-6). After a median follow-up of 54.7 months, median survival was 28.3 months. Disease-free survival at 2 years was 82.1%, and the local, regional, and distant control rates at 2 years were 95.8%, 93.7%, and 83.6%, respectively. An out-of-field distant recurrence at one or more sites was the most common pattern of failure (10%). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was recorded in 30% of patients, with radiation pneumonitis being the most common toxicity (19%). A likely (n = 4) or possible (n = 8) treatment-related death was scored in 19% of patients. There was preexisting interstitial lung disease in eight patients (13%), with fatal toxicity developing in five of them (63%). CONCLUSIONS: Lung SABR in tumors larger than 5 cm resulted in high local control rates and acceptable survival outcomes in a patient population with appreciable comorbidity. Patients with interstitial lung disease should be considered a very high-risk population for SABR.

Microenvironment-Responsive Three-Pronged Approach Breaking Traditional Chemotherapy to Target Cancer Stem Cells for Synergistic Inoperable Large Tumor Therapy.

Three-pronged nanoparticles (NPs) that can efficiently prohibit the proliferation of large tumor are developed for inoperable large tumor therapy. The NPs achieve spatially and temporally controlled release of drugs in target sites. The NPs induce the apoptosis of differentiated cancer cells, cancer stem cells, and vascular niches simultaneously. Importantly, the three-pronged NPs inhibit the growth of large tumors without recurrence.

Ret mouse very large tumors (VLTs) display altered ratios of infiltrating memory to naive T cells: Roles in tumor expansion.

Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer, however it is immunogenic. The size of the primary tumor is associated with the nodal metastases. Our goals were to characterize melanoma-associated antigens (MAAs) and tumor-infiltrating T-lymphocytes (TILs) subsets in the few very large tumors (VLTs) developing in ret transgenic mice of melanoma. Tumors >700mg (VLTs) were investigated for MAAs and subsets of TILs. Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry-based studies were performed to determine the infiltration patterns of T-lymphocytes in VLTs. It was observed that zinc fixative restores the antigenicity of the cell-surface markers of lymphocyte subpopulations without the need of antigen retrieval, whereas formalin-based fixative fails to restore the antigenicity in the presence of antigen retrieval in the immunohistochemistry. VLTs from ret mice express MAAs, such as Tyrosinase, TRP-1, TRP-2 and gp-100. The mean±standard deviation (S.D.) T-cell infiltration per 400 times-high power field in VLTs; CD4(+) (2.33±1.3), CD8(+) (2.00±1.0), and CD4(+) Foxp3(+) (2.5±0.5) regulatory T cells infiltration was exclusively restricted to the tumor stroma. Moreover, our flow cytometry-based data reveal that % mean±S.D. naive CD3(+) CD4(+) T cell infiltration (32.8±4.0%) was significantly larger than effector (25.8±2.8%, p<0.01) and central memory cells (16.1±3.7%, p<0.001) in VLTs. Similarly, between CD3(+) CD8(+) T cells, naive cells infiltrate (57.7±2.3%) in a significantly larger frequency than effector (5.0±0.4%, p<0.0001) and central memory cell (4.8±1.7%, p<0.0001) subsets. These results suggest that the VLTs from ret mice display lowered infiltration ratios between memory and naive T cells, which could be associated with the relatively large growth of VLTs.

Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy.

Extreme oncoplasty is a breast conserving operation, using oncoplastic techniques, in a patient who, in most physicians' opinions, requires a mastectomy. These are generally large, greater than 5 cm multifocal or multicentric tumors. Many will have positive lymph nodes. Most will require radiation therapy, even if treated with mastectomy. Sixty-six consecutive patients with multifocal, multicentric, or locally advanced tumors that spanned more than 50 mm were studied (extreme cases). All patients underwent excision and oncoplastic reconstruction using a standard or split wise pattern reduction and immediate contralateral surgery for symmetry. All received postexcisional standard whole breast radiation therapy with a boost to the tumor bed. The extreme cases were compared with 245 consecutive patients with unifocal or multifocal tumors that spanned 50 mm or less (standard cases). All extreme patients were advised to have a mastectomy; all sought a breast conserving second opinion. Diagnostic evaluation included digital mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and PET-CT (if invasive). Standard cases did extremely well. No ink on tumor was achieved 96% of the time among 245 patients. The median tumor size was 21 mm (mean 23 mm). Margins equal or greater than 1 mm were achieved in 88.6% of patients. Seventeen (6.9%) standard patients underwent re-excision to achieve wider margins and only one patient (0.4%) was converted to mastectomy. With 24 months of median follow-up, three patients (1.2%) experienced local recurrence. For extreme cases, no ink on tumor was achieved 83.3% of the time, which is comparable to published positive margin rates after standard lumpectomy. The median tumor size was 62 mm (mean 77 mm). Margins equal or greater than 1 mm were achieved in 54.5% of patients. Six (9.1%) extreme patients underwent re-excision to achieve wider margins and four patients (6.1%) were converted to mastectomy. With a follow-up of 24 months, one patient (1.5%) experienced a local recurrence. Extreme oncoplasty is a promising new concept. It allows successful breast conservation in selected patients with greater than 5 cm multifocal/multicentric tumors. It may be useful in patients with locally advanced tumors following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. From a quality of life point of view, it is a better option than the combination of mastectomy, reconstruction, and radiation therapy. Long-term data on recurrence and survival are not available, using this approach. Based on historical data, it is expected the local recurrence will be somewhat higher but that there will be little or no impact on survival.

Double mandibular osteotomy with segmental mandibular swing approach to parapharyngeal space.

Surgical removal of benign tumors of the Parapharyngeal space (PPS) is the treatment of choice. PPS tumors may remain undetected for long periods of time and large tumors in the PPS can extend into the Retropharyngeal Space or into the Infra-Temporal Fossa. Anatomically, the mandible represents a significant obstacle to successful PPS surgery. Except for very small tumors, it is difficult to remove larger tumors from this region without some form of mandibular retraction. The standard mandibular "swing" approach involves splitting of the lower lip and a single parasymphysis osteotomy for retraction of the mandible laterally to expose the PPS. However, the morbidity associated with midline lip split and anesthesia of the hemi-labial region caused by the severing of the mental nerve is an unwanted complication of this approach. In this article, we describe an easier double mandibular osteotomy (Segmental Mandibular Swing Approach) which avoids the morbidity associated with lip splitting or intra-oral mucosal incision but allows excellent exposure of the superior and lateral aspect of PPS for easier removal of large tumors in this region.