Regional Flap Donor Sites in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Regional flaps are vital to head and neck reconstruction, allowing surgeons to harvest numerous reliable flaps without the need for microvascular anastomosis. These flaps are very useful in cases of vascular depletion and may prove superior to free flaps as a primary option in certain circumstances. Numerous harvest options are available, and the described harvest techniques are safe and straightforward for an experienced reconstructive surgeon to learn. Donor site morbidity is variable depending on flap selection but minimal in many cases. Regional flaps are an excellent option in resource-limited settings or when minimizing reoperation is a high priority.

Pedicled Functional Latissimus Flaps for Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity following Resection of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.

(1) Background: Resection of soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of the upper extremity can result in substantial functional impairment with limited options for functional reconstruction. Free functional latissimus flaps have been utilized to restore function of the thigh; however, there is limited data on the use of latissimus flaps for functional reconstruction in the upper extremity. As such, we sought to evaluate our institutional experience with these flaps. (2) Methods: We reviewed ten (seven male; three female; and a mean age of 63 years) patients undergoing soft-tissue sarcoma resection involving the triceps (n = 4), biceps (n = 4), and deltoid (n = 2) reconstructed with a pedicled functional latissimus flap. All surviving patients had at least 1 year of follow-up, with a mean follow-up of 5 years. (3) Results: The mean elbow range of motion and shoulder elevation were 105° and 150°. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 88%, and the muscle strength was four. Four patients had a recipient site wound complication. There were no flap losses. One patient sustained a radiation-associated humerus fracture 5 years postoperatively, treated nonoperatively. (4) Conclusions: Although early complications are high, pedicled functional latissimus flaps allow for wound coverage, potential space obliteration, and restoration of function in the upper extremity following resection of large soft tissue sarcomas.

Modern Innovations in Breast Surgery: Robotic Breast Surgery and Robotic Breast Reconstruction.

Robotic surgery has a history of applications in multiple surgical areas and has been applied in plastic surgery over the past decade. Robotic surgery allows for minimal access incisions and decreased donor site morbidity in breast extirpative surgery, breast reconstruction, and lymphedema surgery. Although a learning curve exists for the use of this technology, it can be safely applied with careful preoperative planning. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy may be combined with either robotic alloplastic or robotic autologous reconstruction in the appropriate patient.

Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Procedure in a Swine Model.

BACKGROUND: As surgical research expands in both breadth and scope, translational models become increasingly important. The accessibility, reproducibility, and clinical applicability of translational models is of vital importance to ensure adequate and accurate research. Though different flap models have been described, the literature lacks an in-depth, technical description of an easy large-animal preclinical model. We here describe the procedure for elevation of a latissimus dorsi flap in a swine. This flap contains muscle and skin that can be isolated on a vascular pedicle, transferred as a free flap, perfused, or innervated/denervated as dictated by the needs of the experiment. METHODS: Five different latissimus dorsi flaps were elevated in miniature swine. Careful attention was paid to anatomical landmarks and optimal placement of incision, dissection, and retraction. Temporary ischemia with vascular clamping was performed along with serial digital and infrared imaging both intra- and postoperatively. In three of the flaps with induced ischemia, the animal was observed for a 30-day follow up with daily photodocumentation and intermittent biopsy. RESULTS: A reproducible latissimus flap model was designed with optimized conditions. In the animals in which flaps were followed postoperatively, complete healing was seen within 30 days without evidence of procedure-related ischemia or loss of motor function. CONCLUSION: We have identified and described a pre-clinical large animal flap model that can be easily reproduced for translational studies of multiple scientific areas including flap-based repair, ischemia, ischemia reperfusion, and operative technique. This provides an important model for ready replication in preclinical studies of many varieties.

Latissimus Dorsi Flap in the Treatment of Thoracic Wall Defects After Medial Sternotomy.

Background: This study aimed to describe the subjective and objective results of the latissimus dorsi muscle flap and propose it as a reconstructive option for postoperative thoracic defects. Methods: A systematic search for cases with pedicle-based latissimus dorsi flaps performed after medial sternotomy was conducted, and all cases occurred between 2010 and August 2017. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were retrospectively analyzed and then the correlations between prognostic factors and outcomes of flap surgery were calculated. Furthermore, an evaluation of the subjective quality of life after flap surgery was performed using questionnaires. Results: A total of 25 cases were identified (8 female and 17 male patients) with the mean age of 75.28 years (range, 55-88 years). The average survival rate was 39.63 ± 23.03 months. The proportion of patients with a survival rate of 1 year was 84.00% (21 patients), and the proportion of patients with a 2-year survival rate was 80.00% (20 patients). While 24% of all patients who had latissimus dorsi flap operations experienced no complications, 64% of them developed minor complications (non-life-threatening, Clavien-Dindo grades I-IIIb) and 12% of them developed major complications (life-threatening, Clavien-Dindo grades IV-V). There was a significant correlation between the low survival rate and risk factors such as a positive history of smoking (P = .034), renal insufficiency (P = .022), metabolic syndrome (P = .004), and the presence of postoperative complications (P < .00002). No significant correlation was observed between the survival rate and obesity (P = .396), hyperlipoproteinemia (P = .684), arterial hypertonia (P = .0450), diabetes (P = .891), cardiovascular comorbidities (P = .794), the interval between sternotomy and latissimus flap surgery (P = .075), the duration of flap surgery (P = .207), sternal osteitis (P = .78), and intraoperative application of norepinephrine (P = .818). We identified metabolic syndrome (hazard ratio: 6.27), renal insufficiency (hazard ratio: 3.935), and the presence of postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 2.965) as high-risk prognostic factors. The subjective evaluations revealed positive reports from the patients with an average score of 1.86 ± 1.03 (1.0 = very good; 5.0 = poor). Conclusions: The majority of the patients with defects after median sternotomy were treated successfully with the latissimus dorsi flap. High survival rates, low rates of severe complications, and subjective scoring of improved life quality make this procedure relative safe and reliable. However, some prognostic risk factors limit the outcome, so these factors should be considered during surgical planning.

Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with latissimus flap: Prepectoral versus subpectoral approach.

BACKGROUND: Use of latissimus flap in prosthetic breast reconstruction after mastectomy is an established approach, particularly in patients who have failed breast-conserving therapy. This study presents a comparison of the prepectoral and the subpectoral approach for two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with a latissimus flap. METHODS: A retrospective review of outcomes and complications was completed between the prepectoral group (n = 33 patients, 50 reconstructed breasts) and the subpectoral group (n = 22 patients, 36 reconstructed breasts). RESULTS: The demographics were similar between the prepectoral and subpectoral groups in terms of mean age (52.4 vs. 52.5 years, p = 0.97), smoking history (15.1% vs. 13.6%; p = 1.00), radiation history (75.8% vs. 91.0%; p = 0.28), and mean length of follow-up (479 vs. 680 days; p = 0.07). The body mass index was significantly higher in the prepectoral group (27.6 vs. 25.2 kg/m2; p = 0.03). Complications were similar between the groups in terms of hematoma (9.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.26), infection resulting in implant failure (9.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.64), thromboembolic events (3.0% vs. 4.5%, p = 1.0), donor site seroma (66.7% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.09), breast seroma (18.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.51), capsular contracture (9.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.64), animation deformity (39.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.58), and reoperation (24.2% vs. 22.8%, p = 1.00). Patient satisfaction scores were also similar between the groups (4.33 ±â€¯1.08 vs. 4.14 ±â€¯1.13, p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: The prepectoral approach for two-stage immediate prosthetic reconstruction with a latissimus flap has similar outcomes and complications to those of the subpectoral approach, yet obviating the need for any pectoralis major muscle dissection.

Barbed sutures in breast reconstruction.

Postoperative closure techniques in breast reconstruction have remained largely unchanged over the past 75 years, despite recent use of adhesives and subcuticular staples and the advent of self-anchoring barbed sutures. In this article, the author discusses the applications for barbed sutures in breast reconstruction and describes specific techniques. Innovations in barbed suture material are also described, and the author's personal experiences are presented in comparison with traditional suturing techniques.