Left gastric vein to adrenal vein anastomosis: intraoperative solution for gastric venous congestion following extended distal pancreatectomy.

Extended distal pancreatectomy often requires resection of vascular structures and adjacent organs, potentially leading to gastric venous congestion. This case report describes a 49-year-old female who underwent radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. During the procedure, segmental gastric venous congestion was observed and resolved by anastomosing the left gastric vein to the left adrenal vein. The in-hospital postoperative recovery was initially uneventful; however, the patient was readmitted because of intra-abdominal fluid collection that was managed with antibiotics. Pathological examination confirmed moderately differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma with lymphovascular invasion. The patient received adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX therapy and remains disease-free 12 months after surgery with adequate patency of the anastomosis. This case highlights the importance of recognizing and addressing gastric venous congestion during radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy to prevent complications, such as delayed gastric emptying or gastric necrosis, and proposes left gastric vein to left adrenal vein anastomosis as an effective intraoperative solution.

Liver Pseudotumor Due to Aberrant Left Gastric Vein: A Case Report.

Liver pseudotumors (pseudolesions) pose diagnostic challenges in imaging, often linked to anomalous venous drainage. Notably, aberrant left gastric vein (ALGV) plays a role in segment 2 and 3 pseudolesions. A liver parenchymal pseudolesion due to abnormal venous drainage involving ALGV is highlighted. Understanding hepatic vascular dynamics, exemplified by ALGV-related pseudolesions, aids diagnosis and guides decisions. Further investigating intricate mechanisms underlying these anomalies is crucial. Teaching Point: The recognition of third inflow pathways such as ALGV holds significance in distinguishing hepatic pseudolesions from true lesions.

Aberrant left gastric vein: what should surgeons know?

PURPOSE: Aberrant left gastric vein is a rare variant and hardly known by surgeons. Its misidentification may lead to accidental bleeding. More importantly, it can also be the root of hypertensive gastropathy in cirrhotic patients and tumor spread in patients with gastric cancer. Here, we describe and provide imaging data of the three patterns of aberrant left gastric veins. METHODS: Over the past 5 years, three cases were noted, each one corresponding to one of the three variants. RESULTS: Aberrant left gastric vein is a rare anatomical entity and has rarely been reported. Its normal anatomy and variants, embryological origins, radiological analysis, and clinical implications are all discussed, bringing light to what surgeons should know when encountering an aberrant left gastric vein. CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware of the types of ALGV, its associated arterial variations, the presence of pseudolesion or not, and the potential atrophy of liver segment.

Left Gastric Vein Width Is an Important Risk Factor for Exacerbation of Esophageal Varices Post Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Gastric Varices in Cirrhotic Patients.

Background and Objectives: Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) could be currently one of the best therapies for patients with gastric varices. This study examined the exacerbation rates for esophageal varices following BRTO for gastric varices in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 91 cirrhotic patients who underwent BRTO for gastric varices. In total, 50 patients were examined for exacerbation rates of esophageal varices following BRTO. Esophageal varices and their associated exacerbation were evaluated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients were allocated into two groups according to the main inflow tract for gastric varices: (1) 37 patients in the left gastric vein (LGV) group with an LGV width of more than 3.55 mm, and (2) 13 patients in the non-LGV group who had short gastric vein or posterior gastric vein. Moreover, treatment outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: LGV width (p < 0.01) was the major risk factor for the deterioration of esophageal varices post BRTO. In addition, LGV was the most common inflow tract, and the LGV group contained 74% (37/50) of patients. The exacerbation rates of esophageal varices at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years post BRTO were 40%, 62%, 65%, and 68%, respectively. The comparison of the exacerbation rates for esophageal varices following BRTO according to inflow tract showed that the exacerbation rates were significantly higher in the LGV group than those of the non-LGV group (p = 0.03). In more than half of the subjects, LGV was the main inflow tract for gastric varices, and this group experienced more frequent exacerbations of esophageal varices following BRTO compared to patients with different inflow tract sources. Conclusion: Careful attention should be paid to the LGV width when BRTO is performed for gastric varices.

Anatomical observation and clinical significance of the left gastric vein in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The left gastric vein (LGV) plays an important role in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (LRG). However, the anatomy of the LGV is complicated with significant variation, and it is often damaged and bleeding during LRG. The purpose of this study was to observe and analyze the anatomic types of the LGV in patients undergoing LRG and to explore its clinical significance. METHODS: A total of 217 patients who underwent LRG from June 2016 to December 2020 were included. LGVs were divided into four types according to the relationship between the LGV and peripheral arteries [celiac artery (CA)/common hepatic artery (CHA)/splenic artery (SA)] and the pancreas during LRG. If a LGV was damaged during surgery (resulting in bleeding), it was included in the bleeding group. Non-bleeding groups were included if there was no impairment to the LGV. RESULTS: A total of four types of LGVs were observed, of which type I was the most prevalent, accounting for 58.8% (n=121). In 21 patients (9.7%), the LGV was injured and hemorrhagic during LRG; and the type IV LGV injury bleeding rate was as high as 41.7% (5/12). Univariate analysis revealed that the extent of lymph node dissection (LND), pathological stage, tumor (T) stage, and type of LGV were significantly associated with LGV injury and hemorrhage (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that enlarged LND, late T stage, late pathological stage, and type IV LGV were independent risk factors for LGV injury hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: LGVs that run between the CHA (posterior) and the CA into the portal venous system were the most common anatomical type. A LGV that runs between the SA (posterior) and the CA into the portal venous system is easily injured (resulting in bleeding). LGV injury and hemorrhage are affected by a variety of factors, and therefore, careful intraoperative dissection is necessary to avoid damage to the LGV.

Color Doppler Ultrasound in Portal Hypertension: A Closer Look at Left Gastric Vein Hemodynamics.

Portal hypertension is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. A color Doppler evaluation of the left gastric vein (LGV) has proven utility in the prediction of esophageal varices and variceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension. The purpose of this review is to discuss the ultrasound evaluation, imaging findings, and clinical application of Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of the LGV. Knowledge of the color Doppler technique and imaging findings of the LGV may help clinicians improve the monitoring of portal hypertension and predict patients with a high risk of esophageal varices.

Can the Computed Tomographic Aspect of Porto-Systemic Circulation in Cirrhotic Patients be Associated with the Presence of Variceal Hemorrhage?

Background and objectives: Variceal bleeding is a serious complication caused by portal hypertension, frequently encountered among cirrhotic patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the aspect of the collateral, porto-systemic circulation, as detected by CT are associated with the presence variceal hemorrhage (VH). Materials and Methods: 81 cirrhotic patients who underwent a contrast-enhanced CT examination were retrospectively included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: Cirrhotic patients with variceal hemorrhage during the hospital admission concomitant, with the CT examination (n = 33) and group 2-cirrhotic patients, without any variceal hemorrhage in their medical history (n = 48). The diameter of the left gastric vein, the presence or absence and dimensions of oesophageal and gastric varices, paraumbilical veins and splenorenal shunts were the indicators assessed on CT. Results: The univariate analysis showed a significant association between the presence of upper GI bleeding and the diameters of paraoesophageal veins, paragastric veins and left gastric vein respectively, all of these CT parameters being higher in patients with variceal bleeding. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the diameter of the left gastric vein was independently associated with the presence of variceal hemorrhage (OR = 1.6 (95% CI: 1.17-2.19), p = 0.003). We found an optimal cut-off value of 3 mm for the diameter of the left gastric vein useful to discriminate among patients with variceal hemorrhage from the ones without it, with a good diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.78, Se = 97%, Sp = 45.8%, PPV = 55.2%, NPV = 95.7%).Conclusions: Our observations point out that an objective CT quantification of porto-systemic circulation can be correlated with the presence of variceal hemorrhage and the diameter of the left gastric vein can be a reliable parameter associated with this condition.

Incidence and hemodynamic feature of risky esophageal varices with lower hepatic venous pressure gradient.

Background: To examine the incidence of cirrhosis patients with high-risk esophageal varices (EV) who show hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) < 10 mmHg and to identify their hemodynamic features. Methods: This prospective study consisted of 110 cirrhosis patients with EV, all with the candidate for primary or secondary prophylaxis. Sixty-one patients had red sign, and 49 patients were bleeders. All patients underwent both Doppler ultrasound and HVPG measurement. Results: There were 18 patients (16.4%) with HVPG < 10 mmHg. The presence of venous-venous communication (VVC) was more frequent in patients with HVPG < 10 mmHg (10/18) than in those with HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg (19/92; p = 0.0021). The flow volume in the left gastric vein (LGV) and the incidence of red sign were higher in the former (251.9 ± 150.6 mL/min; 16/18) than in the latter (181 ± 100.5 mL/min, p = 0.02; 45/92; p = 0.0018). The patients with red sign had lower HVPG (13.3 ± 4.5) but advanced LGV hemodynamics (velocity 13.2 ± 3.8 cm/s; flow volume 217.5 ± 126.6 mL/min), whereas those without red sign had higher HVPG (16.2 ± 4.6, p = 0.001) but poorer LGV hemodynamics (10.9 ± 2.3, p = 0.002; 160.1 ± 83.1, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Patients with high-risk EV with HVPG < 10 mmHg showed 16.4% incidence. Although low HVPG may be underestimated by the presence of VVC, the increased LGV hemodynamics compensates for the severity of portal hypertension, which may contribute to the development of red sign.

Aberrant left gastric vein is associated with hepatic artery variations.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the imaging findings and hepatic artery variations encountered in patients with aberrant left gastric vein (ALGV). METHODS: A retrospective database search between January 2014 and November 2018 was carried for ALGV. The course and types (1-3) of ALGV, the presence of associated liver lesions, and coexistence of hepatic artery variations were reviewed on CT images. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (22 men, 68.7%) with a mean age of 52.5 years (range 22-76 years) were found to have ALGV. The prevalence of ALGV was 0.073%. The most frequent type of ALGV was type 1 (n = 22, 68.7%), followed by type 3 (n = 7, 21.8%) and type 2 (n = 3, 9.3%). We noticed mild-to-severe parenchymal hyperdensity at the posterior aspect of segments II and III in patients with type 1 (n = 20/22) and type 2 (n = 2/3) ALGV consistent with fat sparing due to third inflow effect. Two out of seven patients with type 3 ALGV had main portal vein thrombosis; however, the presence of ALGV maintained left portal vein flow in these patients. Twelve (37.5%) patients had accompanying hepatic artery variation. Left hepatic and right hepatic artery variations were detected in 8 (25%) and 2 (6.25%) of the patients, respectively. In 2 patients, Michels type IV variation was detected. CONCLUSION: Aberrant left gastric vein is associated with hepatic artery variations, which can be important for preoperative and pretransplant planning.

Anatomic variations in the left gastric vein and their clinical significance during laparoscopic gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons normally encounter the left gastric vein (LGV) during laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer, and the various anatomic variants of this vessel make the procedure difficult. The objective of this study was to classify anatomic variants of the LGV in the laparoscopic operation field and clarify their clinical significance during LG. METHODS: In total, 405 patients who underwent LG in 2013-2017 for gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. LGV drainage was classified into six types by the anatomic relation of the LGV to the arteries of the celiac axis: Type Ia [LGV runs anteriorly to the common hepatic artery (CHA)], Type Ip (LGV runs posteriorly to CHA), Type II (LGV runs anteriorly to the left gastric artery), Type IIIa [LGV runs anteriorly to the splenic artery (SA)], Type IIIp (LGV runs posteriorly to SA), and Type IV (LGV runs cranially into the proximal portal vein or liver parenchyma). If the LGV was injured during the operation, the patient was included as a member of the injury group (IG). RESULTS: Most patients (n = 391, 96.5%) had a single LGV, whereas 14 (3.5%) patients had double LGVs. Type Ip was the most common of the six drainage types (n = 195, 48.1%). The number of patients in the IG was 49 (13.0%). Types I and III were relatively easily injured when compared with type II (p = 0.025). Patients in the IG had longer operation times, more blood loss, and more lymph node metastases than the non-IG patients. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, the LGV drains posteriorly to the CHA or anteriorly to the LGA. Gastric surgeons should take great care not to injure the LGV during LG when it is not present on the anterior side of the celiac axis.

Left Gastric Vein Visualization with Hepatopetal Flow Information in Healthy Subjects Using Non-Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Balanced Steady-State Free-Precession Sequence and Time-Spatial Labeling Inversion Pulse.

Objective: To selectively visualize the left gastric vein (LGV) with hepatopetal flow information by non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography under a hypothesis that change in the LGV flow direction can predict the development of esophageal varices; and to optimize the acquisition protocol in healthy subjects. Materials and Methods: Respiratory-gated three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession scans were conducted on 31 healthy subjects using two methods (A and B) for visualizing the LGV with hepatopetal flow. In method A, two time-spatial labeling inversion pulses (Time-SLIP) were placed on the whole abdomen and the area from the gastric fornix to the upper body, excluding the LGV area. In method B, nonselective inversion recovery pulse was used and one Time-SLIP was placed on the esophagogastric junction. The detectability and consistency of LGV were evaluated using the two methods and ultrasonography (US). Results: Left gastric veins by method A, B, and US were detected in 30 (97%), 24 (77%), and 23 (74%) subjects, respectively. LGV flow by US was hepatopetal in 22 subjects and stagnant in one subject. All hepatopetal LGVs by US coincided with the visualized vessels in both methods. One subject with non-visualized LGV in method A showed stagnant LGV by US. Conclusion: Hepatopetal LGV could be selectively visualized by method A in healthy subjects.

CT imaging-based determination and classification of anatomic variations of left gastric vein.

BACKGROUND: Precise determination and classification of left gastric vein (LGV) anatomy are helpful in planning for gastric surgery, in particular, for resection of gastric cancer. However, the anatomy of LGV is highly variable. A systematic classification of its variations is still to be proposed. We aimed to investigate the anatomical variations in LGV using CT imaging and develop a new nomenclature system. METHOD: We reviewed CT images and tracked the course of LGV in 825 adults. The frequencies of common and variable LGV anatomical courses were recorded. Anatomic variations of LGV were proposed and classified into different types mainly based on its courses. The inflow sites of LGV into the portal system were also considered if common hepatic artery (CHA) or splenic artery (SA) could not be used as a frame of reference due to variations. RESULTS: Detailed anatomy and courses of LGV were depicted on CT images. Using CHA and SA as the frames of reference, the routes of LGV were divided into six types (i.e., PreS, RetroS, Mid, PreCH, RetroCH, and Supra). The inflow sites were classified into four types (i.e., PV, SV, PSV, and LPV). The new classification was mainly based on the courses of LGV, which was validated with MDCT in the 805 cases with an identifiable LGV, namely type I, RetroCH, 49.8 % (401/805); type II, PreS, 20.6 % (166/805); type III, Mid, 20.0 % (161/805); type IV, RetroS, 7.3 % (59/805); type V, Supra, 1.5 % (12/805); and type VI, PreCH, 0.7 % (6/805). Type VII, designated to the cases in which SA and CHA could not be used as frames of reference, was not observed in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed depiction of the anatomy and courses of LGV on CT images allowed us to evaluate and develop a new classification and nomenclature system for the anatomical variations of LGV.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of vascular arrangement including the hepatic artery and left gastric vein during gastric surgery.

BACKGROUND: During gastric surgery, precise recognition of the anatomical variations and relationships among gastric tumors and vessels, including the hepatic artery (HA) and left gastric vein (LGV), is required. We utilized a three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed image as a preoperative simulation for gastric surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients who underwent gastrectomy at Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital. This cohort was sequentially divided into a without-3D group (n = 42) and with-3D group (n = 42), and the perioperative outcomes were compared. The 3D image could be used to classify the HA or LGV arrangement pattern. RESULTS: Regarding the HA arrangement, the right HA of 1 patient (2.3 %) was arising from the superior mesenteric artery, the left HA of 8 patients (19 %) was arising from the left gastric artery, 29 patients (69 %) presented a normal rearrangement, and 4 patients (9.5 %) exhibited other arrangements. The analysis of the LGV arrangement revealed that the LGV in 15 patients (36 %) was located on the dorsal side of the common HA, the LGV in 5 patients (12 %) was located on the ventral side of the common HA, the LGV in 12 patients (29 %) was found on the ventral side of the splenic artery, the LGV in 6 patients (14 %) was located on the dorsal side of the splenic artery, and 4 patients (9.5 %) presented other arrangements. The intraoperative blood loss in the without-3D and with-3D groups was 276 ± 430 and 157 ± 170 g, respectively (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The 3D reconstruction technique was useful for understanding and sharing anatomic information during gastric surgery.

Evaluation of left gastric vein in Chinese healthy adults with multi-detector computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the classification and diameter of left gastric vein (LGV) in healthy Chinese adults with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: MDCT angiography was performed in 234 healthy adults for the portal venous system. CT cross-sectional thin-layer reconstruction combined with maximum intensity projection, volume rendering and multiplanar reconstruction were applied. The diameter of LGV was measured at the point within 2 cm from LGV origination. RESULTS: Of 234 subjects, 11 subjects (4.70%) who did not have clear images were excluded, and 223 subjects (95.30%) with excellent images were included. The LGV was originated from the portal vein in 46.15%, splenic vein in 30.77%, portal splenic angle in 14.53%, and the left branch of the portal vein in 3.85%. The maximal diameter of LGV was 4.74 ± 0.84 mm with a 95% confidence interval of 4.63-4.85 mm, and the LGV diameter was positively correlated with the weight of patients (R = 0.26, P = 0.006). No significant difference existed in the maximal diameter of LGV at different origination sites (P = 0.35). The diameter of LGV was significantly greater in males than in females (4.90 ± 0.85 vs. 4.56 ± 0.80 mm, P = 0.002), and the maximal diameter of LGV was significantly (P = 0.02) greater in the age range of 30-39 and 40-49 years than in the range of >70 years. No statistical significance (P = 0.36) was detected in the other groups. CONCLUSION: MDCT can clearly display the detailed anatomy and variation of LGV in healthy adults, providing a normal range of LGV diameter for clinical reference for diagnosing possible portal hypertension and for possible intervention.

Classification of portal vein tributaries in Thai cadavers including a new type V.

PURPOSE: To compare portal vein tributaries in Thai with Thompson classification. METHODS: In 211 Thai cadavers, abdominal regions were dissected to identify the portal veins and their tributaries. The subjects were classified into types based on modes of drainage of the left gastric and inferior mesenteric veins. Percentages of all types of venous drainage were counted. RESULTS: There are four types of portal tributaries as defined by Thompson, type I_47.87 %, type II_13.27 %, type III_7.58 %, and type IV_29.86 %. There were 1.42 % of whose inferior mesenteric veins entered the joining angle of the superior mesenteric and splenic veins, and were classified as type V. The left gastric vein mostly drained into the portal vein in 79.15 %, while the inferior mesenteric vein emptied into the splenic vein mainly in 55.45 %. CONCLUSIONS: A new variance of portal tributaries in Thai cadavers is reported. The variations of portal vein formations are critical for liver surgery and interventional radiological procedures.

Strategic approach to concurrent aberrant left gastric vein and aberrant left hepatic artery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: A case report.

An aberrant left gastric vein (ALGV) directly entering the lateral segment of the liver is a rare variation in the portal vein system, whereas an aberrant left hepatic artery (ALHA) arising from the left gastric artery is observed relatively frequently. Here we report a case in which both ALGV and ALHA were encountered before laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with curative lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. We accurately diagnosed these vessel anomalies preoperatively on abdominal contrast-enhanced CT. During surgery, we divided the ALGV at the point of entry to the liver and preserved the ALHA by dividing the branches toward the stomach, in consideration of curability and safety. The postoperative course was uneventful overall, although temporary mild liver dysfunction was observed. This case highlights the importance of preoperative evaluation and preparation in a rare case of concurrent ALGV and ALHA.

Diameters of left gastric vein and its originating vein on magnetic resonance imaging in liver cirrhosis patients with hepatitis B: Association with endoscopic grades of esophageal varices.

AIM: To determine whether diameters of the left gastric vein (LGV) and its originating vein are associated with endoscopic grades of esophageal varices. METHODS: Ninety-eight liver cirrhotic patients with hepatitis B undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) portography, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for grading esophageal varices were enrolled. Diameters of the LGV and its originating vein - the splenic vein (SV) or portal vein (PV) - were measured on MR imaging. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the association of the diameters with the endoscopic grades. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that the SV was predominantly the originating vein of the LGV, and diameters of the LGV and SV were associated with grades of esophageal varices. Diameters of the LGV (P = 0.023, odds ratio [OR] = 1.583) and SV (P = 0.012, OR = 2.126) were independent risk factors of presence of the varices. Cut-off LGV diameters of 5.1 mm, 5.9 mm, 6.6 mm, 7.1 mm, 7.8 mm and 5.8 mm; or cut-off SV diameters of 7.3 mm, 7.9 mm, 8.4 mm, 9.5 mm, 10.7 mm and 8.3 mm, could discriminate grades 0 from 1, 0 from 2, 0 from 3, 1 from 3, 2 from 3, and 0-1 from 2-3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diameters of the LGV and SV are associated with endoscopic grades of esophageal varices.

Alterações angiográficas e pressóricas determinadas pela esplenectomia e ligadura da veia gástrica esquerda em portadores de esquistossomose mansônica / Angiografic and pressoric changes determined by splenectomy with left gastric vein ligature in mansoni schistosomiasis

RACIONAL: Na esquistossomose mansônica na forma hepatoesplênica ocorre fibrose hepática difusa que associada à congestão venosa do sistema porta resulta em hepatoesplenomegalia. Pode produzir hemorragia digestiva alta por rotura das varizes de esôfago e do estômago ou lesões pépticas da mucosa gastroduodenal. OBJETIVO: Estudar os efeitos da esplenectomia e ligadura da veia gástrica esquerda sobre a hemodinâmica portohepática. MÉTODO: Vinte e três portadores de esquistossomose mansônica na forma hepatoesplênica foram estudados prospectivamente, antes e cerca de duas semanas após a operação, através de estudos angiográficos dos diâmetros da artéria hepática comum e própria, artéria esplênica, artéria mesentérica superior, veia porta, veia mesentérica superior e veia gástrica esquerda. Foram aferidas as pressões da veia cava inferior, venosa central, da veia hepática livre, da veia hepática ocluída e sinusoidal. RESULTADOS: A ligadura da veia gástrica esquerda determinou acréscimo significante nas seguintes variáveis: diâmetros da artéria hepática comum e própria; diâmetro da veia mesentérica superior; o acréscimo não foi significante nas seguintes medidas: pressão venosa central e diâmetro da artéria mesentérica superior. Ela promoveu decréscimo não significante nas variáveis: pressão da veia cava inferior; pressão da veia hepática livre; pressão da veia hepática ocluída; pressão sinusoidal; diâmetro da veia porta. CONCLUSÃO: A ligadura da veia gástrica esquerda, na maioria dos casos, não determina alterações hemodinâmicas significantes do sistema porta capazes de quebrar o equilíbrio hemodinâmico funcional, que caracteriza a esquistossomose mansônica na forma hepatoesplênica.

BACKGROUND: In hepatosplenic schistosomiasis occurs diffuse hepatic fibrosis associated with venous congestion of the portal system resulting in hepatosplenomegaly. It can produce digestive hemorrhage caused by rupture of esophageal and stomach varices or peptic gastroduodenal mucosal lesions. AIM: To study the effects of splenectomy and ligature of the left gastric vein on portohepatic hemodynamics. METHOD: Twenty-three patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis mansoni were studied before and about two weeks after operation through angiographic diameter of the common and proper hepatic artery, splenic artery, superior mesenteric artery, portal vein, superior mesenteric vein and left gastric vein. The pressures of the inferior vena cava and central venous pressure, free hepatic vein, the hepatic sinusoidal and occluded vein were measured. RESULTS: The splenectomy and ligature of the left gastric vein determined low morbidity and null mortality. It determined significant addition to the following variables: diameters of the common and proper hepatic artery; diameter of the superior mesenteric vein. It determined non significant increase on the following measurements: right atrial pressure and diameter of the superior mesenteric artery. It determined non significant decrease to the following variables: inferior vena cava pressure; free hepatic vein pressure; occluded hepatic vein pressure; sinusoidal pressure, diameter of the portal vein. CONCLUSION: Splenectomy and ligature of the left gastric vein do not determine portal hemodynamic changes capable of breaking the functional hemodinamic balance that characterizes the hepatosplenic mansoni schistosomiasis.

To-and-fro waveforms in the left gastric vein in portal hypertension.

Unusual to-and-fro waveforms were demonstrated in the left gastric vein on Doppler sonograms in four patients with liver cirrhosis. The patterns of the to-and-fro waveforms were diverse in each of the patients: both hepatopetal and hepatofugal flow occurred in a single waveform in case 1, changes in the flow direction with flow interruption were noted in case 2, and changes in flow direction without observation of flow interruption and changes after meals were noted in cases 3 and 4, respectively. These waveforms may represent a transitional phase during the development of a portal systemic shunt in patients with portal hypertension.

Collateral pathways in portal hypertension.

Presence of portosystemic collateral veins (PSCV) is common in portal hypertension due to cirrhosis. Physiologically, normal portosystemic anastomoses exist which exhibit hepatofugal flow. With the development of portal hypertension, transmission of backpressure leads to increased flow in these patent normal portosystemic anastomoses. In extrahepatic portal vein obstruction collateral circulation develops in a hepatopetal direction and portoportal pathways are frequently found. The objective of this review is to illustrate the various PSCV and portoportal collateral vein pathways pertinent to portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis and EHPVO.